Military Review

China managed to create a double modification of the deck fighter J-15

23
China managed to create a double modification of the deck fighter J-15



China managed to create a two-seat modification of the J-15 carrier-based fighter. November 3 photo appeared on the Chinese Internet double-deck fighter J-15S, thus confirming that this aircraft really exists, and, according to rumors, performed the first flight.

It is noted that in the Soviet Union and Russia there is no double deck modification of the Su-33 aircraft, which became the prototype for the Chinese machine.

The photos obtained show clearly that the fighter is equipped with a brake hook. Back in 2012, there were reports that a prototype double deck fighter was created and completed the first flight, but there were doubts, as there was no clear photo with a brake hook and photo / video flight. However, the photo / video of the flying J-15S has not yet been made public.



Single J-15 is the first generation of Chinese carrier-based fighters, created on the basis of the third-generation aircraft (the Chinese designation of the fourth generation).

The prototype made the first flight of 31 August 2009 of the year, 15 of September 2013 of the year made the first take-off and landing with a combat load on the aircraft carrier "Liaoning" (ex- "Varyag").





Originator:
http://green-stone13.livejournal.com/88510.html
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Kibalchish
    Kibalchish 6 December 2013 07: 14
    +8
    Well, then, my applause to the Ukrainian brothers in mind who sold the prototype Su-33 to China at a bargain price. And do not la la ... that, they say, the Chinese fleet does not threaten us. Many Russian cities in the Far East are located on or near the coast.
    So much for the consequences of IDIOTISM!
    1. Civil
      Civil 6 December 2013 07: 18
      0
      Ukrainian Mne Ne Zemlyak.
    2. Orel
      Orel 6 December 2013 07: 35
      +1
      What kind of aircraft it is is not clear. This is essentially the glider of our su-27 in the deck modification of the su-33, but the plane is not so much a glider today, but avionics and engines. What is inside it? Hard to say. It looks beautiful, but in fact the Chinese do not even have adequate engines for this aircraft, not to mention another internal filling, which determines the combat capabilities of the aircraft. If this aircraft is exactly the same as their destroyers, which look beautiful, but inside the technology of the 50s, 60s, then we have nothing to fear ...
  2. makarov
    makarov 6 December 2013 07: 37
    +7
    Does it follow yours that I unearthed an early hacked plane in the garden and moved the Chinese?
    Of course it’s ridiculous to think so, Power advances ...
  3. Sanamana
    Sanamana 6 December 2013 07: 56
    -4
    Ours did not build such an aircraft. I wonder if there was a need for a double?
    1. Chicot 1
      Chicot 1 6 December 2013 17: 56
      +5
      Quote: Sanamana
      Our aircraft did not build

      What are you! Take a closer look at this illustration and take a closer look at the Su-27KUB ... PlizZz! ..
      1. Sanamana
        Sanamana 9 December 2013 12: 19
        0
        I do not state, but ask! Just sea double did not see!
  4. stalker
    stalker 6 December 2013 07: 58
    0
    the Chinese can come up with something of their own, they have cars that have a Mercedes face, a BMW rear, that our planes are similar, but touch everything copied, but the external similarity does not mean the quality inside.
  5. Lindon
    Lindon 6 December 2013 08: 05
    +7
    Revenge of the Sidhas: "We urgently need to steal this two-seater prototype from the Chinese and flood the entire market with copies."
    1. ed65b
      ed65b 6 December 2013 08: 52
      +4
      Quote: Lindon
      Revenge of the Sidhas: "We urgently need to steal this two-seater prototype from the Chinese and flood the entire market with copies."

      And so that the Chinese choked with saliva to make it triple and mount it in the wing of R2-D2 laughing
      1. Deniska
        Deniska 6 December 2013 10: 52
        +3
        And for the greater resentment of the Chinese write MADE IN GANDURAS
  6. Archikah
    Archikah 6 December 2013 08: 45
    +5
    Ukrainians are our brothers. But here are all sorts of Yushchenko and gas queens with Armenian roots. A good film is Leontyev's Orange Children of the Third Reich. Everything can be understood and understood in the hidden motivation. And all such Yushchenko and Yanukovychs sold weapons. smile
  7. twviewer
    twviewer 6 December 2013 08: 48
    -1
    all the same, we didn’t need these su33s, and aircraft carriers weren’t needed - we don’t know how to use it ... by the way, there’s a good movie on this subject called idiocy :)
    and about avionics do not even doubt it will certainly be no worse than the original
    Quote: stalker
    the Chinese can come up with something of their own, they have cars that have a Mercedes face, a BMW rear, that our planes are similar, but touch everything copied, but the external similarity does not mean the quality inside.

    why should they do what they need when they need proven, cheap and fast ?!
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 6 December 2013 08: 57
      +6
      quote to China managed to create two-seat modification of the J-15 carrier-based fighter. On November 3, photos of the J-15S double decker fighter appeared on the Chinese Internet, thereby confirming that this aircraft really exists, and, according to rumors, completed its first flight.

      Nonsense, I won’t believe it and no one will convince me that they created. I would write it like that.
      China finally succeeded copy two-seat modification of the J-15 carrier-based fighter.

      So rather.
      1. VAF
        VAF 6 December 2013 12: 58
        +6
        Quote: Apollon

        Nonsense, I won’t believe it and no one will convince me that they created. I would write it like that.
        China finally managed to copy the two-seat modification of the J-15 carrier-based fighter.


        I totally agree! +! drinks

        And I’ll add an article, otherwise they’re all rumored, and there’s nothing lol

        And the first flight of the J-15S made another 03.11.2012 year bully

  8. Wedmak
    Wedmak 6 December 2013 09: 00
    +3
    Question: Did this plane fly from the deck of an avik or from the ground? And then there are doubts about where the Chinese have such powerful engines (I don't know if ours will cope with what we gave them?) To lift a two-seater Su-33 from an avik, and even with "luggage" ??
    1. VAF
      VAF 6 December 2013 13: 07
      +4
      Quote: Wedmak
      to lift a two-seater Su-33 from an avik, and even with "luggage" ??


      Denis, what's the problem? The plane can, but how do you put it "avik" theirs can, but ours ..... recourse only 2 + 2.. unfortunately.



      And a 1-seater or 2-seater practically does not affect weight, because Compensation of the weight of the 2nd pilot and additional equipment is carried out due to fuel, and for our engines 200-400kg ... is not critical.





    2. VAF
      VAF 6 December 2013 13: 16
      +4
      Quote: Wedmak
      and even with "luggage" ??


      Here the "baggage" is more clearly visible wink

  9. rolik2
    6 December 2013 09: 20
    +5
    Quote: Kibalchish
    Well, then, my applause to the Ukrainian brothers in mind, who sold the prototype Su-33 to China

    It is strange to hear complaints from a resident of a country that sold a license to China and a production line for their assembly of the Su-27. Or are you shield that the Chinese could make a decked version WITHOUT the Su-27 plant ??
    Who supplied the equipment?
    Who taught the staff?
    After the collapse of the union, this prototype went to Ukraine quite legally and she could do whatever she wanted with it, you could calmly redeem it, but you didn’t do it so there’s nothing to blame
  10. Ahmed Osmanov
    Ahmed Osmanov 6 December 2013 09: 50
    +2
    J-15 - SU-30. Well done Chinese, good copy. But seriously, it is necessary to create a law to protect intellectual property, otherwise this is no longer the case when absolutely all of our products are copied. For example, the United States - even a thermal imaging sight cannot be taken out without special permission.
  11. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 6 December 2013 11: 55
    +2
    China managed to create a double modification of the deck fighter J-15

    It would be more accurate to say that the "great" China has managed to assemble a two-seat modification of a copy of the Su-33 fighter.
  12. vmnss
    vmnss 6 December 2013 14: 01
    +1
    Miracles sometimes happen, but not in this case. Under the conditions of the ship, the take-off weight cannot be infinitely increased; accordingly, the co-pilot will entail a decrease in either the fuel supply or the quantity of suspended weapons. Well, or put a catapult, gentlemen, the Chinese.
  13. lilit.193
    lilit.193 6 December 2013 14: 53
    +1
    Yeah. They created. If you copy now called create, then I am the Queen of England.
  14. Kyrgyz
    Kyrgyz 6 December 2013 15: 05
    0
    Maybe they didn’t get a single?
  15. alone
    alone 6 December 2013 23: 15
    0
    A copy, not a copy (although I'm sure a copy), the Chinese managed to do it. And now they will begin to produce these aircraft at an accelerated pace. And the most interesting thing will be when they put it up for sale cheaper than the original. Then they will understand everything that means "Ally "who Tiharya is waging an economic war
  16. twviewer
    twviewer 7 December 2013 03: 40
    0
    They will not put up for sale because they themselves do not have enough, at least for now, but they will not buy from us either :) because we have no sou 33 and never will. and then J15s is a naval attack aircraft with UB capability, by definition, more expensive than the land version, and countries with aircraft carriers can be counted on one hand, i.e. there is really no one to sell .. that's why "our" su33 and ditched, and not because it is bad or heavy
    PS do not shoot the pianist, he plays as he can :)