Military Review

In January 2014, the dismantling of another Antey class nuclear submarine will begin

37
In January 2014, the dismantling of another Antey class nuclear submarine will beginThe disposal of the next Russian nuclear submarine / nuclear submarine / Kalmar class will begin at the beginning of 2014 in the Primorsky Territory. About this correspondent. TASS was reported today by the head of the project office of the Integrated Dismantling of Nuclear Submarines of Rosatom, Anatoly Zakharchev.


"In January of 2014, we plan to conclude a disposal contract and unload nuclear fuel from a submarine in order to dispose of it later in the Primorsky Territory," he said.

According to Zakharchev, a large reconnaissance nuclear ship "Ural" and an Antey class submarine (Kursk-type) will be prepared for disposal, which will be disposed of in Kamchatka. Zakharchev added that "only two nuclear submarines" remained on the peninsula.

On behalf of the government, Rosatom in 2009 developed the concept of a new program for the disposal of nuclear submarines, surface ships with nuclear power plants and the rehabilitation of onshore technical bases for the period up to 2015 and up to 2020. The program includes the disposal of nuclear technology vessels and surface ships with nuclear power plants.
Originator:
http://www.itar-tass.com/c134/938302.html
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 2 November 2013 07: 56
    15
    I read the headline and remembered the 90s (already distorted ..)
    1. Mitek
      Mitek 2 November 2013 09: 11
      15
      Quote: MIKHAN
      I read the headline and remembered the 90s (already distorted ..)

      And don't speak! BDR could stand at the wall on the Battlefield ... But the boat is really old. I heard about Anthei that they are very noisy (submariners, correct if I'm wrong). And "Ural", unfortunately, is a ship of another Army and era. And fucking perestroika and later Yeltsin's timelessness practically killed this ship. All that is possible was supplied for non-ferrous metal, and the technologies do not stand still.
      1. Bronis
        Bronis 2 November 2013 16: 38
        +6
        Quote: Mitek
        . I heard about Antei that they are very noisy (submariners, correct if I'm wrong).

        Noisy or not - the main thing is that the replacement is late. As far as I understand, either Krasnodar or Krasnoyarsk are going to dispose of Anteyevs, they have been in the sludge for 15 years. So there is no need to talk about restoration in our reality ...
        949 "Granite" and 949A "Antey", by the way, under the program of "mutual threat reduction" (Nunn-Lugar Program) were removed from the structure. The USA and Norwegians (it seems) gave money for recycling. So they ruined a lot of things ... and our "partners" closely watched this as the winning side ... disgusting.
      2. starshina78
        starshina78 2 November 2013 18: 34
        0
        There is a modernization! now, when there are few boats in the fleet, it is necessary to carry out modernization, if it is expedient. "Ural" - yes, this is not what is required. Its operation is too expensive.
        1. bif
          bif 4 November 2013 00: 40
          0
          Quote: starshina78
          Ural "- yes, this is not what is required

          The change of this old man is already "on the way" and there will be 2 of them.
          Large reconnaissance ship / special communications vessel. The project was developed by the Central Design Bureau "Iceberg" (St. Petersburg). The ship is being built by the Severnaya Verf Shipyard (Saint-Ptereburg). The lead ship of the project is Yuri Ivanov. On June 13, 2013, the ship was rolled out of the slipway onto the open slipway of Severnaya Verf, in 2014, after the necessary tests, it will be handed over to the customer.
          September 24, 2013 - The media report that a contract has been signed with OJSC Severnaya Verf for the construction of the first serial ship, pr.18280 - Ivan Khurs. For the new order, metal cutting has begun, the completion of construction and installation works - 2016. The laying is planned for November 14, 2013. "
  2. Simon
    Simon 2 November 2013 08: 00
    +9
    Very sorry. sad Our nuclear fleet is gone. Honor and glory to the atomic submarines that have served their age. soldier
    1. bolonenkov
      bolonenkov 2 November 2013 15: 33
      +4
      Quote: Simon
      Our nuclear fleet is gone

      Stop the panic !!!!
      1. bif
        bif 3 November 2013 11: 51
        +1
        Quote: bolonenkov
        Stop the panic !!!!

        / Submarine / class "Kalmar" - there are 4 left (all at the Pacific Fleet), and in service since 1980-82, it's time to retire, a low bow to them for their good service.

        The large nuclear-powered reconnaissance ship "Ural" is unique - its curse, hard-born, with frequent accidents, after the fire of 1991 it never recovered. Disposed of profitably - will become a donor (In June 2012, the General Director of Rosatomflot State Corporation Rosatom, Vyacheslav Ruksha, announced his intentions to use the equipment and power plant of the Ural for the repair of operating nuclear icebreakers)

        Submarine class "Antey" - disposal will most likely befall one of the very first Antey, in service since 1986 (Krasnoyarsk or Krasnodar).
      2. bif
        bif 3 November 2013 13: 25
        +2
        Quote: bolonenkov
        Our nuclear fleet is gone
        Stop the panic !!!!

        Among the four Russian fleets, only the North and Pacific have atomic submarines, and this trend will continue. All new submarine nuclear submarines will enter the combat structure of these two fleets
        "Yuri Dolgoruky" - the lead ship of the 955 project "Northwind". By 2018 year, it is planned to build 8 submarines of this project.
        "Alexander Nevsky" - 2013, "Vladimir Monomakh" (project 955) will be accepted -2014.
        Ash-tree (885) Severodvinsk 2013
        The Pacific Fleet will be the first to receive the new Boreas. There is an objective reason for this - today it includes the oldest strategic submarines - Project 667 BDR.
        The "younger", project 667 BDRM "Dolphin", serve in the Northern Fleet.
        The Black Sea Fleet, according to the commander of Rear Admiral Alexander Fedotenkov, from 2014 to 2017 will receive six Project 636.3 submarines (Varshavyanka 636M), which have already been laid down at the Admiralty Shipyard in St. Petersburg.
        These boats will form the basis for the formation of a full-fledged submarine brigade of the Black Sea Fleet. By that time, the only submarine Alrosa of Project 877 will remain in the fleet.
        The Baltic Fleet found itself in the most difficult position due to problems with the tests of the "St. Petersburg". It was this boat and the "frozen" Kronstadt at the shipyards that were to be the first to strengthen the submarine forces of the Baltic Fleet. Now the command is faced with a choice - either to order submarines of Project 636, or wait several years for the industry to master the production of submarines of the modernized Project 677 "Lada" with anaerobic energy.
        Antey
        Vysotsky’s predecessor as commander of the Navy, Admiral Vladimir Masorin, noted in an interview with Izvestia that the fleet needs at least four types of submarines: strategic Borei, tactical Yaseni, multi-functional Antei and diesel Varshavyanka.

        Now the Navy is armed with seven Anteyevs, two more in long-term repair, and one is preparing for disposal. In addition, there is an unfinished hull of such a boat, mothballed in the 1998 year, in the 2012 year a decision was made to complete the special project.
        Junk - Krasnodar, Long-term repair of K-173 Krasnoyarsk, K-132 Irkutsk
        SF-K-119 "Voronezh", K-410 "Smolensk", K-266 "Eagle"
        Pacific Fleet - K-456 "Tver", K-186 "Omsk",
        K - 150 “Tomsk” - 16 Sep 2013 fire during repair, operational not earlier than 2014
        K-442 Chelyabinsk-with 2012 awaiting repair
        - In a good way, instead of Antei, we need a new project for a multifunctional boat. But now the fleet is in such a position that any unit is worth its weight in gold, ”Masorin explained.
        http://eurasian-defence.ru/node/23063 Сводная иформация.
  3. Alikovo
    Alikovo 2 November 2013 08: 02
    +2
    They should not be disposed of in vain; boreas and ash-trees in their entirety have not yet been commissioned.
    1. Ezhaak
      Ezhaak 2 November 2013 09: 40
      14
      Not in vain. Used equipment must be discarded without delay. Otherwise, tragedies cannot be dispensed with. fool
  4. Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 2 November 2013 08: 12
    -3
    Reconnaissance ship?
    And why is he picturing rocket mines behind the wheelhouse?
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 2 November 2013 12: 30
      +5
      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
      Reconnaissance ship?
      And why is he picturing rocket mines behind the wheelhouse?

      Unfortunately on this resource (and indeed in our media) the attached photo material does not always coincide with the topic of the article.
      1. sub307
        sub307 3 November 2013 10: 31
        +1
        Actually, in the photo like Project 667BDRM, if I'm not mistaken.
    2. andris_74
      andris_74 2 November 2013 19: 43
      0
      this is for reconnaissance in battle ;-))
    3. rolik
      rolik 2 November 2013 23: 56
      0
      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
      And why is he picturing rocket mines behind the wheelhouse?

      This is not a photo of Antei
      1. Ivan Tarasov
        Ivan Tarasov 3 November 2013 18: 26
        0
        And then why publish?
  5. shpuntik
    shpuntik 2 November 2013 08: 23
    11
    According to Zakharchev, a large nuclear reconnaissance ship Ural and an Antey-class nuclear submarine (Kursk-type) will be prepared for dismantlement, which will be dismantled in Kamchatka.

    Hmmm, such ships are leaving. In return, nothing is visible. I look forward to the promised Shoigu 5 launches of Bulava. bully
  6. andrei332809
    andrei332809 2 November 2013 08: 24
    +9
    recycling is faster than construction ... Democrats, their feet in their mouths. 949 project can be said new, why the hell is the disposal? or is it easier to cut a boat than to resume the production of granites?
  7. ZU-23
    ZU-23 2 November 2013 08: 30
    +1
    Then please tell me where all this metal went)))
    1. andrei332809
      andrei332809 2 November 2013 08: 37
      +3
      Quote: ZU-23
      Then please tell me where all this metal went)))

      To China
      1. ZU-23
        ZU-23 2 November 2013 10: 04
        +2
        and then to us back to us, whatever the Chinese, in the form of a Chinese car, which in a couple of years will fall apart and go back to China like ferrous metal, to return later and again squeeze money from us, they live one and a half billion)))
        1. Dimy4
          Dimy4 2 November 2013 10: 29
          +1
          We have a new Chinese forklift for a year; the starter flew. Dismantled, the gear on the bendix as clay all crumpled.
          1. ZU-23
            ZU-23 2 November 2013 12: 39
            +4
            Well, it’s more than half the economy of China’s consumer goods, here I bought Chinese oilcloth on the table, in a beautiful package, such as they dragged it out there terrible, I immediately remembered the chemical attack in Syria.
            1. Revolver
              Revolver 3 November 2013 04: 54
              -1
              Quote: ZU-23
              immediately remembered a chemical attack in Syria.

              From now on, please read more. Where, when, under what circumstances, and most importantly - which side were you on?
        2. andrei332809
          andrei332809 2 November 2013 10: 31
          +1
          Quote: ZU-23
          and live one and a half billion)

          metal cycle in nature
    2. gispanec
      gispanec 2 November 2013 19: 45
      0
      Quote: ZU-23
      Then please tell me where all this metal went)))

      at the Amurmetall Met Combine! ... fact .... less will go to China
  8. AVV
    AVV 2 November 2013 10: 39
    +2
    If the boat was ballast for the Navy then it’s a natural process, but two new ones should be put in its place !!!
  9. egor 1712
    egor 1712 2 November 2013 10: 59
    +8
    Bad news. We dispose faster than building new ships.
  10. CCCP 2.0
    CCCP 2.0 2 November 2013 11: 25
    +2
    heart bleeds
  11. Budilnik
    Budilnik 2 November 2013 11: 42
    0
    Can it be that preserving not only a unique boat, but also the labor of millions of Soviet citizens, it is impossible to convert it into the carrier of several hundred cruise missiles? Such boats are planned to be manufactured in the USA.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 2 November 2013 12: 37
      +2
      Quote: Budilnik
      Can it be that preserving not only a unique boat, but also the labor of millions of Soviet citizens, it is impossible to convert it into the carrier of several hundred cruise missiles? Such boats are planned to be manufactured in the USA.

      The fact is that in order for the ship to serve its term, and moreover, proper operation and timely repair / modernization are needed. If this does not happen, then the most magnificent ship turns into dust in a short time. And if a surface ship, even in extremely poor condition, can still be driven out to sea under the supervision of tugs (as an example of TAVKR Kuznetsov, nicknamed in the fleet "floating Dagestan"), then such a trick will not work with a nuclear submarine, therefore our nuclear submarines go for cutting much faster and more often surface ships.
    2. Corsair
      Corsair 3 November 2013 06: 42
      0
      Quote: Budilnik
      Can it be that preserving not only a unique boat, but also the labor of millions of Soviet citizens, it is impossible to convert it into the carrier of several hundred cruise missiles? Such boats are planned to be manufactured in the USA.

      The boat is really good, but it's not worth talking about "uniqueness", since a whole series of such ships has been built.
      Ammunition "Antey" 24 cruise missiles "Granit" + torpedoes and torpedo-missiles. Therefore, talking about "several hundred" missiles is at least strange ...
  12. nazgul-ishe
    nazgul-ishe 2 November 2013 12: 49
    0
    Can I use it as a floating speaker?
  13. theadenter
    theadenter 2 November 2013 12: 56
    +1
    The construction of submarines and surface ships is a very time-consuming and laborious process. Never, in a sober mind, no commander in chief will leave his country with a bare ass in the form of a gap in the submarine fleet. I don’t understand where everyone is in a hurry to cut them. And what if the war? In the bathrooms, launched into the water, will we beat off the enemy’s fleet with shovels? So troubled times.
  14. APASUS
    APASUS 2 November 2013 13: 32
    +2
    Who writes these articles?
    The article mentions the Kalmar-class nuclear submarine, in the title of the Antey-class nuclear submarine.
    Is it the same thing? the author does not see the difference between these vessels at all?
    1. alone
      alone 2 November 2013 18: 47
      0
      wassat apparently does not see. for the author all submarines are just submarines.
  15. Reasonable, 2,3
    Reasonable, 2,3 2 November 2013 14: 23
    0
    Quote: MIKHAN
    I read the headline and remembered the 90s (already distorted ..)

    Article minus. The author is clearly in a hurry. In the photo, not "Antey", but "Delta3". Even such articles should not be noticed.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  16. rudolff
    rudolff 2 November 2013 14: 47
    +3
    Confusion is possible in the name. The article mentions boats of two projects: Squid and Antei. In the photo just 667 BDR Squid. Perhaps K-433 St. George the Victorious.
  17. Skuto
    Skuto 2 November 2013 15: 14
    +2
    Out of 949A Anthei who will be cut: "Krasnoyarsk" or "Irkutsk"? If the latter, then it's really a pity ((
  18. rudolff
    rudolff 2 November 2013 16: 16
    +9
    Yes, they are both sorry. Krasnoyarsk was accepted in the 86th, in the Pacific Fleet since the 91st, and already in the 95th it was put into reserve and since then the type has been waiting for an average repair. The same story with Irkutsk, in reserve since the 97th. How much they managed to serve there, for several years. Either insanity, or wrecking.
    1. alone
      alone 2 November 2013 18: 49
      +2
      You forgot about the personal benefits of those who dispose of these boats. For these people, the drum served for many years on the drum.
  19. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 2 November 2013 19: 05
    +2
    Quote: Zakharchev added that "only two nuclear submarines remained on the peninsula."
    But there was a time when the frightened Americans called the base in Kamchatka "Wasp's Nest". The most bitter legacy of the Yeltsin plutocracy is the practical destruction of the Russian Navy.
  20. Klibanophoros
    Klibanophoros 2 November 2013 19: 20
    +2
    People involved in recycling, please take a photograph of the Ural ship for future generations. Interiors, engine rooms, in general, all that may seem interesting. The ship is unique.
    And anyway, why Antei? They’re not old.
  21. starmos
    starmos 2 November 2013 21: 36
    +1
    always when the ship is sent to the scrap it somehow becomes sad crying and in the photo by the way BDRM "dolphin" something like this wink and what does he have to do with Antaeus fool
    1. Skuto
      Skuto 3 November 2013 00: 32
      0
      I think the issue of weapons has not been resolved. Looks like an idea to "marry" Anteyev with caliber and onyx, the road to implementation.
  22. masterovoy
    masterovoy 3 November 2013 11: 03
    +1
    This submarine has served its term, my classmate served on it, later on the costs of its operation are excessive, and the effectiveness of combat use does not exceed 0,21, in general, "rubbish", and not a combat unit. Better to direct funds for the construction of new submarines.
  23. gregor6549
    gregor6549 4 November 2013 15: 50
    0
    I did not understand how this author managed to confuse Kalmar with Antei a couple of times in a short article. These are still two big differences, as they would say in the glorious city of Odessa what
  24. Evgeniy667b
    Evgeniy667b 5 November 2013 11: 18
    0
    Apparently, the heads of the fleet (and others like them) had an "urgent need" to change their personal fleet to a more prestigious one. Naturally, so much metal for free. It is a sin to cut the bodies that still serve and serve. A CRIME! At least the new submarine was accepted into service, otherwise everything is just chatter.