Military Review

Justification for wealth - only in overcoming poverty

30
In the recently published specialized article of my colleague, respected A.Leonidov (Filippova) “Business activity”, a symbolic model of two interconnected scales is proposed as a symbol of a dual market nature (sale and purchase, delivery-payment, etc.) I consider that a colleague It was possible to create a very capacious and laconic image of the economic movement, in which two or more persons, participants in the exchange, always participate.


Moreover, when Leonidov writes that only a replaceable weight on a light weight scale can give them a constant, undamped movement (http://economicsandwe.com/doc/2405/), I immediately recall that developed countries use their own social democracy: a two-party system in the twentieth century made it possible to form a cycle in which periods of increasing capital among rich people alternate with periods of improving the position of the masses at the expense of rich people. Replaceable weight, or rather you will not say!

Moving forward, development, business activity - the primary problems for any society. Only in the case of personal wealth is justified in the eyes of the masses. Only the constant growth of the economy can serve as a guarantor of the preservation of property rights.

What is the matter? Man is arranged in an obvious way: he is ready to forgive superiority, if he hopes to catch up with him and surpass him. A person hates those whose level he considers unattainable for himself, but tolerates those with whom he does not share the abyss.

In a growth society, RICH TODAY IS I AM TOMORROW. You see, social tension is removed by the fact that an unlucky person again and again development provides chances to win back!

I did not become the director of this factory? Small trouble, new factories are growing, and I have chances!

I'm in the city pushed to the back? Small trouble, new cities are being built, and I can become a “founding father” in them!

Did I lose in this market? Small trouble, new markets are emerging, and in the new industry I will definitely win ...

In a dynamically developing society, in a growing economy, an unlucky person does not want to kill the lucky one, because the chances are not yet exhausted, and in the lucky one can still see himself. In a stagnant-cyclical economy, let alone melting, degrading, the unlucky ones unite to hunt lucky ones and destroy them in very cruel ways at the first opportunity.

There is harsh biological justice: you did not want to give us a chance, and we will not give it to you!

In a society that has lost the dynamics of business activity, in caste society there is no excuse for wealth and cannot be. In such a society, the wealth of the individual becomes a source of hatred, envy and curses.

WE DO NOT FORGIVE TO OTHER POSSESSING THOSE WHICH THEY HAVE LOST HOPE FOR.

This is the law of life - whether we like it or not, whether we like it or not. The preachers of Yeltsinism can repeat a thousand times that envy is a bad feeling, but they will not abolish the law of nature. After all, the very word “success” means “have time”, but where can you have time in a society static-motionless, devoid of dynamics and motor perspectives?

Development draws out social ambitions, directing them in breadth, to the infinity of space. Well, I did not become an editor in this newspaper, it does not matter, new newspapers are opened, I will become there ... And if they don’t open? And if, on the contrary, they close, and the struggle for leadership becomes more acute, acquiring the features of an ominous game of zoologists "rat king"?

In a growing society, everyone will have a place; in a shrinking society, on the contrary, those who had them yesterday lost their places. History shows the absolute symmetry between the processes of business development and social optimism, human family and personal happiness. Want a formula for human happiness? She is in front of you, she is in business dynamics: “tomorrow will be better (more) than yesterday!”. At the same time, as history shows, the current level of life is completely unimportant. You can eat one potato, walk in one quilted jacket, but, anticipating your leadership in the cities of the future, not yet built cities, feel the euphoria of squeamish optimism. And you can be in unusually comfortable conditions, but at the same time fear for the future will make a person a terrible pessimist and a misanthrope.

Throughout the post-war Soviet history, the standard of living of the Soviet people grew. But the level of happiness, optimism, joyful mood, along with the standard of living did not grow. As development slowed down in the 70 of the twentieth century, the level of optimism also dropped. People ate three throats, but were not happy. Already in the 60-ies of the twentieth century, Casta began to form, cutting off the future for those who did not make it into it. And since you have cut off the future - why should you rejoice?

At first, caste acted timidly, inconsistently, experimentally. Of course, 80-s of the twentieth century still know the history of the rapid rise of the individual from the bottom up! But nevertheless, Yeltsinism, as an established and systemic caste system, emerges from the timid inclinations of the party nomenclature of the second half of the twentieth century. Yeltsin concluded what Khrushchev began: blocking social elevators.

Caste hates development in any form, it seeks to stop time, to fix the cash state (let it always be, as it is now) - for two reasons. First, the new threatens the power of the caste, threatens its total control over the lower castes. There are frequent examples when a single technical solution brought down the entire hierarchy that was taking shape over the centuries, because the old bosses, with the use of this new solution, suddenly turned out to be unnecessary.

Secondly, caste hates development also because development MULTIPLE SUCCESSFUL, thereby diluting and blurring the uniqueness of caste representatives. If you have one TV in the city, this is one thing, and if everyone has it, it is quite another. It would seem - you something cares? Your TV is not spoiled and not taken away! You have not lost anything; and in fact you lost everything ...

And that moment comes, well known to the historians of the ancient world, when casteism merges with Satanism and demonism. To be unique is not a sin, but rather a gift of fate. But when the highest caste tries to preserve its uniqueness artificially, destroying and trampling the shoots of everything that could endure life for people as a whole, for humanity, as such, the caste turns into a collection of villains, into a conspiracy against humanity.

Only rapid development can form the NATIONAL UNITY OF THE RICH AND THE POOR. In a society of stagnation or decline, there can be no national unity: if you do not multiply and add, then it turns out that you share any crust of bread with your neighbor and take it from your neighbor. There is no development, no business activity - there is no public justification for wealth. It is no longer a beacon pointing the way to others, but a swamp light wandering through the quagmire and generated by putrefactive processes.

If the rich man does not bring all of us the prospects for tomorrow to become the same as he is today, then why do we need him? - people will inevitably ask. What service purpose and function does it carry in the whole social organism? It turns out - no, he lives not for us, but for himself, but in that case he is no longer an organ, but a parasite or a tumor on the body of society ...

If the engine, instead of pushing the entire car, spends fuel only on its internal processes, then such an engine is thrown into the dustbin. If we consider the rich to be the engines of progress, the vanguard of development, then without progress and development they are broken, spoiled, nowhere, except for waste junk.

So in a society of stagnation (where the entire planet Earth lives today), two hatreds face an ominous twist on the 1917 type of the year: the hatred of the poor for the rich as a useless parasite that does not move society anywhere, and the hatred of the rich for all of humanity, in which the stagnant rich see constant threat to their leadership. What sphere of human activity do not take - every one threatens the stagnant parasite-parasite.

Take the technique: the engineer can invent something that redirects financial flows, shake the power of the top, and therefore down with engineering! Take culture: a writer, an artist, even a composer and a sculptor can awaken common sense, a human nature, intolerant of the leadership of the parasites. So, down with culture, down with art! Take the expanded reproduction of cheap goods: if you make a lot of them, then people will find comfort, and not so zealously they will kiss the feet of the “benefactors of the good” for every copper penny of handouts. And so - down with production, down with cheapness - we do less, more expensive, more inaccessible, so that the slaves know their place ...

The caste, formed by stagnation and ultimately protecting stagnation, artificially deepening and strengthening it — ultimately becomes the enemy of life, all living things that hates humanity, finds itself in necrophilism and necromancy. Isn't that what we are seeing today in the modern "elite"?

If new factories and new cities are not built, new industries and activities are not born, the human need for positive emotions is transformed into social sadism. The connection of social sadism with the “stagnation of the ordinary” is much closer and denser than it is usually thought. The stomach, which does not receive food, begins to digest its own mucous membrane (this is how a stomach ulcer is formed). A man who does not go forward begins to grow into hell. When energy does not expand, it concentrates. And what happens to the concentrated, over-compressed energy? An explosion is a concentration of energy. Spontaneous combustion is the concentration of heat energy. The deformation of any form is a consequence of the compression of energy concentrated to the center ...

The case forms a man with a capital letter. The complexity and novelty of the case form a complex and active mind, in the absence of the same tasks, the mind dies, degrades. Complex hand manipulations are a source of complex spiritual culture and a rich inner content in a person. Remove complex hand manipulations - and get primitive zombie souls ...

It is quite obvious that a person exists as a person (and not a sick sociopath) only in the development and expansion of his activity. Stagnation is incompatible with human nature and ultimately creates monsters, whose idle mind is at the same time monstrous in its savagery of tricks and pathological ideas of the mind. When singing the results and results of the Cause, we often forget to tell about the great healing and creative benefits of the CASE process. For example, the author develops the brain in the process of writing an article, regardless of publications, fees, fame, and similar fruits and the outcome of his work. The first result of his work is in the work itself.

That is why I argue that production and industry exist not only for profit (profits can be obtained in other ways), but also for themselves as an end in themselves. Their very existence is a worthy goal, because it increases the quantity and mental qualities of a country's population. There is work - there is life, hard work - developed mind!

Business and business activity are compelled by fate to pass between the Scylla of slave-owning Satanism and the Charybdis of Leveler-leveling utopias. The essence of business activity is the unlimited supply of new chances for those who are unlucky in life, and the number of new offers increasing in number. A rich man who is degrading from all accessibility and all-permissiveness cannot be a source of business activity, just as a poor beggar who wants to share everything equally and “forever fall asleep” cannot be his source. That is why world science has long argued that both rich and poor are sources of inhibition of development, conservative anchors, and the only source of growth is the so-called. “Middle class”: the one who did not put on the crown, but did not put a cross on himself.

A society in which everything is once and for all divided, cards are not re-passed - there is a society of stagnation, regardless of how it is divided, equal or not equal. Leonid is right here - these are scales, in which the bowl is wedged, and which therefore have no benefit for practical human activity. Capacious image! Scales live by fluctuations of alternating weighings on them. And the economy lives by the fluctuations of lost and re-presented chances for those who want to achieve something in the future. After all, it is obvious that if there are no people who dream of a better future, who believe in a better future, then there is NO FUTURE!
Author:
Originator:
http://www.vened.org/
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. kostik1301
    kostik1301 28 October 2013 12: 03
    18
    Capitalism is a brake on the progress of mankind, as long as this system in power is not what humanity does not expect good, there will be only wars ..............
    1. Civil
      Civil 28 October 2013 12: 22
      10
      Capitalism, communism, socialism .... everything is simpler, extreme concepts, disinterestedness and greed, between them justice. That’s the whole story. In Russia, banal greed has now prevailed.
      1. APES
        APES 28 October 2013 15: 06
        +1
        Quote: Civil
        between them justice


        and what is justice? who measured it?
      2. optimist
        optimist 28 October 2013 17: 48
        +1
        Quote: Civil
        In Russia, banal greed has now prevailed.

        In Russia, stupidity, laziness and betrayal have won. We all, willingly or unwillingly, for the last quarter of a century have "cut down the branch on which we were sitting" ... Ordinary citizens have been bought by the opportunity to get into consumer loans for imported junk and by trips to Turkey and Egypt. And foreign puppeteers "graciously" provided the "elite" with the opportunity to plunder their own country and people. Well, a vulgar article about "good and bad bourgeois" is nothing more than a paid social order. I do not think that our ancestors, who 100 years ago destroyed the incipient capitalism in Russia, were more stupid than us (and most likely, on the contrary, smarter). So, most likely, in the near future we will face a scenario of 100 years ago (at best). And at worst, the final disintegration of Russia and the war of all against all (as in Libya, Iraq, Egypt, etc.)
    2. APES
      APES 28 October 2013 15: 05
      +5
      The demon sat in the form of a man and dangled his feet. He who saw this with spiritual eyes asked him: “Why aren’t you doing anything?” The demon replied: “Yes, I have nothing left to do but to chat with my feet — people do everything better than me.”
      1. Egoza
        Egoza 28 October 2013 19: 50
        +2
        Quote: APES
        people are doing better than me. ”

        Yeah!
        I am looking for a new Guardian Angel. Mine could not stand it.
        Swinging on my inner hamster demon.
        I'll give it inexpensively.
    3. Vadivak
      Vadivak 28 October 2013 15: 25
      15
      Quote: kostik1301
      while this system in power is not what good humanity does not expect


      July 26, 2013 Nobel Prize laureate in physics, academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Zhores Alferov asks a quite reasonable question. "If a citizen is forced to pay for education and medical care, to accumulate a pension from his own funds, to pay housing and utilities in full, at a market price, then why do I need such a state ?!
      1. Gorinich
        Gorinich 31 October 2013 16: 37
        0
        Bravo to Zhores Alferov! Until officials realize that an agreement is urgently needed between a citizen and the state serving him, there will be no sense. And when it comes, it will take a leader who will put this idea into practice (like Peter 1). In general, many more revolutions and showdowns await us ....
  2. Oskar
    Oskar 28 October 2013 12: 13
    10
    Capitalism and Democracy - Evolved Feudalism. The methods of subjugating the masses have changed - that's all. Well, there is nothing to talk about "wild" Russian capitalism.
  3. faraon
    faraon 28 October 2013 12: 15
    +1
    Not a bad article, encouraging, at least theoretically. Of course, there is no limit to perfection, but as one of the military commanders said: "it was smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines."
  4. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 28 October 2013 12: 16
    16
    I do not agree with the author. Most will be able to live and work, subject to justice. let someone be rich and even super rich, so that we never catch him. But if this person spends his wealth not on super expensive yachts, with golden plumbing, and other show-offs. If the Rich spends money on creating jobs, on the fact that working people could live worthily without humiliation, then no one (in the sense of any normal people) will hate him. If our oligarchs were worried about our country, and not invested in foreign sports clubs, if they raised production and science, developed new territories, I am sure that society would never be indignant at 200% of their wealth. And another aspect is the wives and children of the oligarchs. That's who is causing embitterment among the people. Their behavior often has nothing at all with either decency or culture. Of course, there are such decent oligarchs, but this is more likely an exception to the rule. The history of the development of capitalism shows that the first and only rule of all entrepreneurs was, is and will be: profit at all costs. That's it.
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 28 October 2013 14: 03
      +9
      With all due respect, I disagree with you. In my opinion, the oligarchy cannot be "fair" a priori. This is connected with the goals of her, and the goal is one - getting super-profits. Helping the poor, mass charity, etc. is not part of the very concept of the goals of the capitalist !!
    2. APES
      APES 28 October 2013 15: 15
      +5
      Quote: vladsolo56
      The history of the development of capitalism shows that the first and only rule of all entrepreneurs was, is and will be: profit at all costs


      read Orwell's animal farm

      The question is not even profit, it is deeper - the desire of individuals to exalt themselves at the expense of other people.

      As for capital, wealth - it is temporarily and essentially given to a person for a while, then it comes - with Measure.
    3. yur
      yur 28 October 2013 23: 46
      -1
      So why do you disagree with the author of the article? You write exactly what is in the article, only in other words. And you and the article plus.
  5. revnagan
    revnagan 28 October 2013 12: 32
    +7
    Quote: vladsolo56
    If our oligarchs were worried about our country, and not invested in foreign sports clubs, if they raised production and science, developed new territories,

    ... then they would never become what they became oligarchs.
  6. Sunjar
    Sunjar 28 October 2013 13: 05
    11
    I disagree with the author. The main problem of humanity is actually the exploitation of some people by others. In the position of the author, the opposite is indicated, that the rich can and have the right to exploit the poor and the so-called "middle class", and the latter, in turn, should glimmer with dreams of breaking out to the top. But only a few will break out, and the rest will remain slaves in their position. Western Civilization is now instilling this in the minds of people: dream of becoming a singer, actor, athlete (they are there, and here, too, receive a lot of money). Again, not everyone will be able to achieve this. Each person has his own potential: someone has excellent physical characteristics from birth and can become an athlete, someone has a sharp mind from birth and he can become an outstanding physicist, chemist, mathematician. Many will say that a person can develop any quality through his will, but this is not so. Not every person can be a leader, etc. This is statistically visible. Otherwise, in Russia there would be many more people like that, but in practice we do not see this.

    Throughout the post-war Soviet history, the standard of living of the Soviet people grew. But the level of happiness, optimism, joyful mood, along with the standard of living did not grow. As development slowed down in the 70 of the twentieth century, the level of optimism also dropped. People ate three throats, but were not happy. Already in the 60-ies of the twentieth century, Casta began to form, cutting off the future for those who did not make it into it. And since you have cut off the future - why should you rejoice?

    At first, caste acted timidly, inconsistently, experimentally. Of course, 80-s of the twentieth century still know the history of the rapid rise of the individual from the bottom up! But nevertheless, Yeltsinism, as an established and systemic caste system, emerges from the timid inclinations of the party nomenclature of the second half of the twentieth century. Yeltsin concluded what Khrushchev began: blocking social elevators.


    Compared to the current situation in the post-war years, people were the happiest on earth. They defeated the "invincible monster of Nazism", rebuilt cities, flew into space and achieved many other cultural and scientific achievements. All this was done not only for each of his beloved, but in the name of his people and in the name of the whole world. "Today the Soviet Union launched the world's first artificial space satellite into orbit - this is a great achievement of the Soviet people and all mankind!" There were a lot of similar slogans, and this formed the mood of the entire population. There were of course people who reacted negatively to such slogans, but there were much fewer of them than those who believed in it. Today gloom prevails in the country, but from the position of the author, it is now that everyone should be happy and it is now that many discoveries should appear, etc., but where are they?
    "KASTA" was formed immediately after Stalin's death. It was then that they departed from his plans for the present and the future, the party began to break away from the people, at the same time starting to work for itself, elevating it to the rank of an unattainable elite. They wanted riches and many benefits. But you cannot immediately announce this position to the people. As a result, they said one thing and thought about another. As a result, it turned out that the USSR could not be kept.
    So satiety has nothing to do with it. Most and now do not care that they are not the richest. It is much more important that there are sufficient funds to raise their children normally.
    I’ll end with where I actually started: only the elimination of the exploitation of some people by others will make it possible to reach their full potential
    1. baltika-18
      baltika-18 28 October 2013 13: 10
      +4
      Quote: Sunjar
      I do not agree with the author

      And I, too. And I agree with you. You have spoken correctly and there is practically nothing to add.
    2. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 28 October 2013 14: 06
      +3
      The author in the furnace of the revolution! am
      I'm kidding of course) I'm not a "radicalist")))
      BUT just like you absolutely disagree with the author. A society of "inequality" in principle cannot be positive for people around the world.
    3. old rocket man
      old rocket man 28 October 2013 17: 34
      +2
      Quote: Sunjar
      "KASTA" was formed immediately after Stalin's death.

      The "caste" became noticeable after Stalin's death, it was formed even before the revolution, when the party adopted Lenin's thesis about "professional revolutionaries."
      The article is useful, it correctly justifies the presence of a "carrot" in the policy of appeasing the "electorate" (they came up with the same word), but an unpleasant aftertaste remains, in fact, this is a guide to retaining power and an attempt to embellish the appearance of "successful" entrepreneurs. lucky, unlucky, leaders and other rubbish that hides the essence of everything, I emphasize, all oligarchs owe their "success" either to caste or to crime.
  7. makarov
    makarov 28 October 2013 13: 07
    +2
    ".. A person is arranged in an obvious way: he is ready to forgive superiority if he hopes to catch up and surpass it. A person hates those whose level he considers unattainable for himself, but tolerates those with whom the abyss does not share him ..."
    SW author.

    And why are you trying on others your way of thinking ????
    Human happiness is not at all what you describe in your material.
    You just need to be able to be happy, content with the fruits of our labor and rejoicing in the life that each of us builds on our own.
    1. Manager
      Manager 28 October 2013 13: 15
      +1
      Quote: makarov
      And why are you trying on others your way of thinking ????
      Human happiness is not at all what you describe in your material.
      You just need to be able to be happy, content with the fruits of our labor and rejoicing in the life that each of us builds on our own.


      I agree! But not in everything. For example, I believe that a person owns the entire planet and he accordingly has the right to move on it. However, I restrict people in finances. The authorities intentionally bind a person to one place or, on the contrary, they force him to go to work far away from home to reproach him.
    2. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 28 October 2013 14: 11
      +2
      I agree! The author describes not a man of the future, but a man of base animal instincts! One must strive for ideal, and not justify one's weakness and someone’s self-interest!
  8. Same lech
    Same lech 28 October 2013 13: 18
    +4
    In RUSSIA, a bureaucratic oligarchic system has developed, stratification of society is evident.
    And it’s hard for me to imagine what can combine, say, a locksmith from NOVOSIBIRSK and oligarch PROKHOROV.
    Non-viable system.
    1. alone
      alone 28 October 2013 21: 52
      +1
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      And it’s hard for me to imagine what can combine, say, a locksmith from NOVOSIBIRSK and oligarch PROKHOROV


      Well, if only there could be namesakes or namesakes)) otherwise.
  9. Migari
    Migari 28 October 2013 13: 23
    +1
    Everything comes from the upbringing, moral qualities of a person, why some people, having achieved great material prosperity, remain people, engage in philanthropy, help charitable foundations, orphanages, etc. Others will not lift a finger, eagerly buying up real estate, yachts, palaces abroad and arrange such feasts, from which even the Western moneybags are shocked. The simple Russian is ashamed of these moral freaks.
  10. Niki
    Niki 28 October 2013 13: 45
    +1
    The article does not use definitions from the series -ism. Somewhere I already read this: the social structure comes from the nature of human relations, etc ... That is the very root cause of the emergence of social groups is that a person has the properties of a social element. Of course, that society from a small number of participants will receive one set of key characteristics and rules for its development due to the presence of simple feedbacks, and large societies, considered at the state level, are the natural predominance of generalized interests. The only problem is that it is precisely the same people who have to express / voice / represent interests of a state scale (head, body, arms, legs, stomach, etc.)
  11. Niki
    Niki 28 October 2013 14: 45
    +3
    And then we have that subjective the limited nature of people, despite all the power and wealth available to them (and most often due to the corruption of this power / wealth), is trying to express the interests of state and even planetary objective scales.
  12. Grbear
    Grbear 28 October 2013 15: 26
    +5
    Well, the author very competently and convincingly erected an entire building in which there was an excuse for all sectors of society. But the trouble is that he laid the log with the wormhole as the basis. It is the right of one to deceive the other, creating the appearance of opportunity and reachability.

    In addition, in this building there is no concept of morality. What morality can we talk about with an oligarch or just a rich person who created wealth, at least by deceiving his neighbor. And how will this person live on, knowing what he has done and realizing that everyone knows about it. What can he teach his children? Education is at best, but on the side where he will practically break the spiritual bond with both his homeland and his parents. As a result - a moral udod, with hereditary money, which will produce its own kind.

    Pompously, But without concepts - honor, conscience, love - any society will be bent. It is a matter of time and blood.
  13. anushin10ru
    anushin10ru 28 October 2013 15: 32
    0
    Building a fair society is impossible. He was not under Stalin, and not under Putin. Striving for this, I do not argue. There is a positive experience of the USSR in this direction. In order to build a society of equal opportunities, a classless, completely alien exploitation, we need prerequisites of which there is currently no. The Soviet system is an attempt to overtake time, a leap in the future. By the way, not many of us will like this society now. Unified, tightly controlled, ideological. It will not be a paradise, but only a harsh necessity. Sooner or later, if of course civilization on earth does not die, you will have to move from the market to a planned and distribution economy, on a global scale. There will be no personal vehicles, no summer residences, no supermarkets, or even personal apartments. Everything will be regulated, and tightly controlled. I personally do not have the desire to quickly find ourselves in such a society. This is the fate of our descendants. Another scenario is the death of civilization from a lack of resources and wars. What's better?
  14. shtanko.49
    shtanko.49 28 October 2013 15: 40
    +3
    Quote: Thunderbolt
    With all due respect, I disagree with you. In my opinion, the oligarchy cannot be "fair" a priori. This is connected with the goals of her, and the goal is one - getting super-profits. Helping the poor, mass charity, etc. is not part of the very concept of the goals of the capitalist !!

    I completely agree, this is the law of the development of capitalism. But when the contradictions between the means of production and production relations reach a critical point, you get a revolution, this is the objective law of the development of society. Wild, super-greedy, Russian capitalism prepares itself a grave digger.
  15. Alexandr0id
    Alexandr0id 28 October 2013 16: 18
    +1
    the concept of justice is different for everyone - it's just a symbol, no more. you need to live and work according to law and contract. and if you strictly adhere to the letter of the law and contractual provisions, then you can predict, plan, calculate and figure it out for yourself, and accordingly build your future if you need it.
    in this case, the state is needed only as a force designed to control the observance of the law, and it is the letter of the law, and not "yes, of course, it is written in the law, but we all understand that ..." everything, this is where the law ends and life begins according to concepts, and according to the concepts of who is stronger (richer, more influential).
    when all the rules are clear and understandable, a person expects that the more he makes an effort (physical, mental, organizational, etc.), the more he will receive returns from his enterprise, whether it’s his own business or employment.
    those who do not need anything, let them go with the flow, they will remain below. those who are interested in their own development and are ready to work will gradually rise (from any level). those who are already upstairs, rest on their laurels and froze in their development, sooner or later will go around the more motivated and charged.
  16. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 28 October 2013 16: 42
    +5
    Something like this I think wink :
    1. alone
      alone 28 October 2013 21: 53
      +1
      Ilyich hid in ambush! waiting for Serdyukov
  17. bubla5
    bubla5 28 October 2013 19: 54
    -1
    For Russia, this does not apply, all smart heads died or went over a hill in the 90s, someone helped by current companions to drive to the grave, and someone went abroad to force law enforcement agencies, this does not apply to people like birch and goose
  18. Stinger
    Stinger 28 October 2013 20: 59
    +1
    Attic philosophy. A society based on selfish interests cannot be moral and all the more fair.
  19. Selevc
    Selevc 28 October 2013 21: 22
    +2
    ..Any major fortune is based on a crime ... "K. Marx
    First of all, the people will not be indignant at the very fact of the presence of the rich, but the ways in which these conditions were made ... I, for example, would greatly respect my rich compatriot - say an outstanding scientist (Nobel laureate) or a talented inventor or the founding person of a national industrial corporation ... But such now there is no single exception ... But there is a whole herd of former apparatchiks and officials who stupidly got rich on privatization, court intrigues and the banal robbery of their people ... People are not angry that someone has a lot of money, but that they once robbed them !!! Such rich thieves behave appropriately - with the slightest shecher they run over the hill - to the West, and the inflow of capital is beneficial to the West - and it doesn’t matter from where and it doesn’t matter how it was obtained ...

    And how it all began once beautifully - here we will create an OJSC and everything will be cool, here we will issue shares and we will live, here - the factories will be the property of labor collectives ...
  20. pr 627
    pr 627 28 October 2013 21: 37
    -1
    I read almost everyone again the song to share everything in fairness, uncle should take care. And these are the descendants of the great Russians who came to the Pacific Ocean without promising to feed the tsar’s priest from the belly, to give a quiet spot in the order. Passionarity seems not to be the fate of today's Russians, shame gentlemen! Here one writes that a tight distribution society awaits us, so be it if you redirect a person’s ability to create and dare. To inaction and desire to take away. Yes, the resources are not endless with today's technologies, do not suppress the activity of society, you will get new technologies, a new quality of life for everyone, including those who are inactive.
  21. olviko
    olviko 29 October 2013 06: 49
    +1
    In my opinion, the USSR was the best option, it was only necessary to develop it in the right direction. And now what, having removed the head, do not cry through the hair: