Military Review

Pentagon starts building missile defense base in Romania

31
Pentagon starts building missile defense base in Romania

The construction of the base, which is part of the US missile defense system, will begin in Romania later this month. This was announced by the press secretary of the Pentagon, George Little.


As he explained, such arrangements were confirmed at a meeting held earlier that day in Washington, Pentagon chief Chuck Hagel and Romanian Minister of National Defense Mircea Soul.

As Little said, on Hagel’s order, “US Under Secretary of Defense for Political Affairs James Miller will take part in a ceremony at the (Romanian military facility) Deveselu later this month, dedicated to deploying the Aegis American multi-purpose anti-aircraft missile system home base. It is planned that this element of the American missile defense system will be put into operation, as has been repeatedly announced earlier, in 2015, Little said.

According to him, the head of the American military department thanked his Romanian counterpart for the decision of Bucharest to accept this object. According to Hagel, the agreements reached to this effect “strengthen the collective defense on the basis of which NATO was created.” The base in Romania will become an important component of the US plan to deploy elements of a missile defense system in Europe, Little said.

He added that Hagel also welcomed Romania’s decision to buy second-hand F-12 fighter jets from Portugal and described Bucharest as “one of Washington’s most solid allies”. In conclusion, the ministers agreed to explore the possibilities of "expanding strong (bilateral) military cooperation."

The Obama administration proclaimed an “adaptable phased approach” to the creation of a missile defense system in September 2009. Then, the US authorities abandoned the idea of ​​creating a 10 anti-missile (PR) base of a silo-based base in Poland and the deployment of a radar tracking station (RLS) associated with them in the Czech Republic. These plans were developed by the previous US government headed by George W. Bush.

According to the initial decision of the Obama administration, the US missile defense architecture in Europe was supposed to be created in four stages. On the first - in the period of 2011 year - in the Mediterranean Sea were deployed ships equipped with the Aegis and Standard Standard 3 (SM-3) complexes, deployed a missile defense radar in Turkey. On the second - by 2015 year - it was planned to transfer mobile batteries with missiles

SM-3 to the territory of Romania. Then - by 2018 year - they were planned to be deployed in Poland. And by 2020, it was intended to replace these missiles with more advanced ones, capable of protecting the entire territory of NATO member countries not only from medium-range and shorter-range missiles, but also from intercontinental ballistic missiles.

However, in March of this year, the United States announced that they were abandoning the fourth stage of the deployment of a missile defense system in Europe, which caused the greatest objections from Russia. At the same time, Washington decided to deploy 14 interceptor missiles in Alaska, install a second radar station in Japan and explore the possibility of creating a third silo-based anti-missile base on its territory.
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Airman
    Airman 21 October 2013 10: 20
    +8
    And now where are we going to put the Iskanders? It is urgent that the PMR be adopted as part of Russia.
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 21 October 2013 10: 24
      14
      Do not leave Russia alone. sad Lord, there are people in the world who believe that the West is kind and fluffy.
      1. ziqzaq
        ziqzaq 21 October 2013 10: 49
        0
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        They will not leave Russia alone. Lord, there are people in the world who believe that the West is kind and fluffy.

        Well, well, they said it’s like a missile defense system is being created against Iran .... So the Americans seem to have established relations with Iran, well, or at least started building .....
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 21 October 2013 11: 11
          +2
          Quote: ziqzaq
          So the Americans seemed to have established relations with Iran, well, or at least started to improve ...

          You forget about North Korea, just imagine what will happen if the Kim launches its missile in Romania. There will be no salvation, all of Europe will be destroyed belay
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 21 October 2013 11: 07
        +1
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        Lord, there are people in the world who believe that the West is kind and fluffy.

        There are many. And they also believe that Russia is evil and terrible.
    2. Strezhevchanin
      Strezhevchanin 21 October 2013 10: 24
      +3
      Quote: Povshnik
      And now where will Iskander put?

      In Transnistria ?!
    3. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 21 October 2013 11: 06
      +6
      and described Bucharest as “one of Washington’s toughest allies”
      Hitler also said that the Romanians are one of Germany's most solid allies; their firmness in all its glory was demonstrated at Stalingrad. Surrendered first and without further ado wassat
      1. INTER
        INTER 21 October 2013 11: 35
        +4
        I do not understand these assholes, they don’t have money, and at the same time they are building military ultramodern bases, either in Korea, then in Poland, or in Romania! By the way, there is an idea, we will also return to Cuba with Iskanders and the S-400, such as protecting the United States from Venezuela (at least, the calls of the Amers seem similar to this scenario. wassat
      2. Ascetic
        Ascetic 21 October 2013 16: 14
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Surrendered first and without further ado


        I remember the commander had a favorite saying. For example, you are not soldiers of Comrade M.R. but captured Romanians, or what kind of soldier is like a captured Romanian, etc.
        Many of these brave warriors expected that the invasion of Russia would be an easy military walk for them. But they had to leave these illusions in the trenches under the hail of Katyushas, ​​and then during their imprisonment in the harsh Gulag camps. Now again, strive to step on the same rake, only in this war there will be no prisoners
    4. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 21 October 2013 12: 08
      +6
      cover the mattress covers! an urgent need to go to South America with Iskander to be friends with both Peru and Brazil and the Bald Devil, make friends so that amers feel sick of fear constantly and abundantly (this is in addition to diarrhea) yes
    5. Onyx
      Onyx 21 October 2013 12: 10
      +2
      Quote: Povshnik
      And now where are we going to put the Iskanders? It is urgent that the PMR be adopted as part of Russia.

      For such cases, the medium-range complex under development is just right Boundary:
    6. pahom54
      pahom54 21 October 2013 14: 55
      -1
      In addition to the Iskanders, there is another weapon - Poplars and Yars ... So rumunia found its own ... problems ...
    7. bord731
      bord731 21 October 2013 22: 12
      0
      Lease, for 99 years, a piece of land on the banks of the river. Rod for installing iskander - for a nominal fee ...
  2. Edward72
    Edward72 21 October 2013 10: 24
    +6
    They will build mattresses, the gypsies will drag or sell to a quiet one. Of course I would like that.
    1. queen
      queen 21 October 2013 10: 51
      +1
      Quote: Edward72
      They will build mattresses, the gypsies will drag or sell to a quiet one. Of course I would like that.

      once Columbus "swam" for gold there ... now everything is vice versa.
    2. Airman
      Airman 21 October 2013 21: 03
      0
      Quote: Edward72
      They will build mattresses, the gypsies will drag or sell to a quiet one. Of course I would like that.

      Knowing their complexity, staff members will not let them go to the base for a cannon shot, so you are hoping in vain.
  3. Saharok
    Saharok 21 October 2013 10: 25
    +1
    But what is this same well, which is the crisis ??? Or money for missile defense systems that are against terrorists and insidious Iranians BUT are being built very close to Russia, they always have this money ...
    That damn Amerikosy horseradish would be sitting at home and would not hinder us from living, so no, it always scratches in one place.
    1. El13
      El13 22 October 2013 18: 32
      0
      Quote: Saharok
      this money is always there ...

      The one who draws money cannot but have it, you can only pretend that they are not enough.
  4. Nevsky_ZU
    Nevsky_ZU 21 October 2013 10: 25
    +1
    Quote: Strezhevchanin
    Quote: Povshnik
    And now where will Iskander put?

    In Transnistria ?!


    And this is a thought! True, the Russian Federation did not recognize him. what
    1. Strezhevchanin
      Strezhevchanin 21 October 2013 10: 33
      0
      Well, it’s yesterday, and tomorrow glyadish and Samostiina will start scratching turnips, how to give hi
  5. Garik
    Garik 21 October 2013 10: 29
    0
    Clamp su.i! I think after such news the GDP response will not be long in coming, I wonder what it will be. And what surprises the country is the threat of another default in February, and the budget continues to squander as if nothing had happened. Well, the Yankees ...
  6. Gl00mDaem0n
    Gl00mDaem0n 21 October 2013 10: 31
    +2
    To stop all the insinuations with missile defense, you need to put the iskanders (upgraded to medium range) and C400-C500 in Cuba and restore the center of radio interception and monitoring there. To defend against Canadian extremists with improvised rockets. )) And the Americans themselves will disassemble their missile defense systems throughout Europe.
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 21 October 2013 10: 38
      0
      Quote: Gl00mDaem0n
      To stop all insinuations from missile defense, you need to install Iskander (upgraded to medium range) and С400-С500 in Cuba and restore the radio interception and monitoring center there.


      And what will American missiles fly through Cuba and the entire southern hemisphere in the Russian Federation !? wassat

      The meaning is only West, East and North.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 21 October 2013 11: 14
        +3
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        And what will American missiles fly through Cuba and the entire southern hemisphere in the Russian Federation !?

        no, it’s the North Koreans flying through Cuba to the United States. We are not opposing the United States, but to protect the United States from a possible strike from North Korea. We are like partners with the USA, and partners need to be protected wink
  7. Kiliny
    Kiliny 21 October 2013 10: 36
    0
    They would build their bases wherever in New Zealand or on Honolulu. wink
  8. ReifA
    ReifA 21 October 2013 10: 47
    0
    Iskanders in Transnistria + S-400 and base there, quick reaction army :-)
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 21 October 2013 11: 15
      0
      Quote: ReifA
      Iskanders in Transnistria + S-400 and base there, quick reaction army :-)

      I suggest to place all this near Chisinau winked
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 21 October 2013 12: 12
        +1
        and again it will be: Somehow, in the summer at dawn, I looked into a neighboring garden, where a dark-skinned Moldavian girl picked grapes .... smile
  9. major071
    major071 21 October 2013 10: 51
    +5
    Well, that’s the field of activity for the Transnistrian partisans. It remains only to quietly throw weapons. yes
  10. erased
    erased 21 October 2013 10: 57
    0
    Iskander will not reach Romania. You need something more long-range. And it is better to prepare a missile defense system in Romania itself, so that at hour "H" to jerk on the spot.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 21 October 2013 12: 13
      +1
      digging from Moldova? this is a thought! fellow
  11. pensioner
    pensioner 21 October 2013 11: 00
    0
    The construction of a base included in the US missile defense system (ABM) will begin in Romania later this month.
    But I didn’t hear that the gypsies would yell about Iran. They somehow immediately went over to the threat emanating from Russia ... Oh, how is it that right now their self-esteem will rise!
  12. Santa Fe
    Santa Fe 21 October 2013 11: 11
    -6
    What does this base have to do with Russia?

    ICBM routes follow the shortest route - through the North Pole.
    If the Yankees were afraid of our missiles, they would deploy interceptor missiles in Greenland and high latitudes.


    B-52 bomber at the Tula Arctic Air Base, 1500 km from the North Pole



    Missile Attack Early Warning Radar
    Tule airbase, today


    Shoot from the territory of Romania in pursuit - meaninglessly
    This missile base is against Iranian missiles.
    1. Andrey57
      Andrey57 21 October 2013 11: 22
      -1
      From the territory of Romania and Poland, they will not shoot missile defense missiles, they will intercept them on convergent trajectories. hi
      1. Santa Fe
        Santa Fe 21 October 2013 11: 24
        -2
        Quote: Andrey57
        and they will not bullet anti-ballistic missiles in pursuit, they will intercept them on convergent trajectories.

        butter oil

        Take another look at the map. Where is Russia, where is Romania and where are the States
        1. postman
          postman 21 October 2013 15: 31
          -1
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          Take another look at the map

          ON GLOBE !!!
          + at such an angle of interception (Shooting from Romania on the ICBM of the Russian Federation launched in the USA):
          I doubt that EKV has enough kinetics to destroy ICBMs (F x sin A). unless it kicks ... well, or ricochets (just kidding)
      2. postman
        postman 21 October 2013 14: 47
        0
        Quote: Andrey57
        they will intercept them on convergent paths.

        How's that?
        1. Energetically not profitable (size and cost of PR)

        GBI interceptor: consists of a warhead containing an intercept stage, a transition compartment, and a launch vehicle. For the period of development and testing, the PLV system is used as a carrier, representing the second and third stages of the ICBM Minitman II.
        13 tons weight

        2. The time of interception will be huge, which again see 1

        3.What to suggest? (Guidance, this is not an SPR)
        STSS (SBIRS) will record the launch ... turn on the Cobra Dane and UEWR, as well as (soon) the marine radar, at the launch site, the missile defense center begins to build a three-dimensional model of rocket motion and determines the probable place of its fall.
        what next? ICBMs already out of reach of Romania's missile defense
        the mines of the ICBMs of the Russian Federation are FURTHER 500 km from the coastline (Sm-3 is resting) and much further 500 km from Romania (SM-3 and GBI are also resting)
        ================
    2. postman
      postman 21 October 2013 15: 27
      -1
      Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
      they would deploy interceptor missiles in Greenland and high latitudes

      In Greenland, it’s pointless: we look at the globe, in the projection onto it it’s practically apogee (well, to be more precise after). VERY HIGH AND FAR
      They placed "where necessary"

      on Shemia Island (Aleutian Islands), on Kodiak Island, Alaska
      http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/gbi.htm
      1. Santa Fe
        Santa Fe 21 October 2013 17: 32
        -2
        The ignoramus and the charlatan, the Postman, as usual, messed up the entire wall with his obscure comments, but could not explain why the Yankees deployed a missile defense system in Europe

        The answer lies on the surface - so that the "Satan" ICBM could not reach Mars!

        http://www.popmech.ru/article/4666-termoyadernyiy-grad/
        http://topwar.ru/4269-satana-mogla-donesti-boegolovku-do-marsa.html
        1. postman
          postman 21 October 2013 17: 39
          0
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          why do yankees deploy missile defense system in europe

          and WHO ASKED ME: "WHY IN ROMANIA" ????
          1. Santa Fe
            Santa Fe 21 October 2013 17: 47
            -1
            Quote: Postman
            and WHO ASKED ME: "WHY IN ROMANIA" ????

            This question is understood in the context of the dispute.
            1. postman
              postman 21 October 2013 17: 52
              0
              Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
              This question is implied.

              let me and what?
              Do I place a Romanian missile defense?
              Or is he obliged to think over what is implied by someone in some context (and what is it)?

              I had a question:
              "can Romanian missile defense systems shoot down an ICBM of the Russian Federation"
              To which he replied:
              - Romanians do not have about
              If they were, they would not be able if the Russian Federation had not fired its ICBMs on Mount Taide.
              "if only, if only ... beans grew in the mouth"
              1. El13
                El13 22 October 2013 18: 43
                0
                Quote: Postman
                "can Romanian missile defense systems shoot down an ICBM of the Russian Federation"

                At the same time, Oleg - yes, they can ... if the ICBM has not started yet ... why are you like children, the interceptors will be converted into ordinary ballistic first-strike with one touch, what flight time will you guess?
                1. postman
                  postman 22 October 2013 19: 43
                  0
                  Quote: El13
                  , interceptors are converted to ordinary ballistic first strike with one touch,

                  ??
                  1.GBI will be converted ???
                  This one is at least 13t, I will not say anything about the rest.
                  Well ?
                  Warhead type what? Kinetic?
                  EKV will break through the "cover" of the mine ICBM or hunt for Yars, poplar? 64 kg oh how scary
                  2.Homing system? The same in one touch?
                  3.
                  Teykov division: Teykovo, Ivanovo Region, ROMANIA 2000km
                  31-I missile army in Orenburg
                  13th Red Banner Orenburg Missile Division in Yasny
                  62-I missile Red Banner Division in Solnechny (Uzhur-4)
                  and so on Kozelsk, Tatishchevo, Yoshkar-Ola, Nizhny Tagil, Novosibirsk, Irkutsk, Barnaul, Vypolzovo ...
                  EVEN I WILL NOT WRITE HOW MUCH BEFORE THAT ROMANIA KILOMETERS WILL
                  The GBI (which is based in Alaska ...) will probably get (still this is the tip of the Taurus XL ... about 5300km (ballistic), BUT WHO LET IT HAVE, to Romania then?
                  Aegis BMD = 500-700km (RELAX)
                  THAAD = 200 (also RELAX)
                  ==== one-touch heresy, and will not give anything
                  and MGM-31C Pershing II WILL NOT HELP
                  Quote: El13
                  what flight time will you guess?

                  nor what, since it is not feasible.
                  RUSSIA AND CHINA are practically the only countries that (at this ioenert) do not care about all these variations, like SM-3
                  ALL SHPUs and MPU are out of reach of the ABM, MORE THAN 500km from the coastal zone
                  1. El13
                    El13 22 October 2013 22: 46
                    0
                    well, yes, yes, but ours, for prophylaxis with amers on this issue, are fighting, well, the neighbors are being intimidated by the Iskanders, because the Patriots are being put in - nobody cares, but these racquets - are very worried, don't they think?
                    Today, a kinetic interceptor is buried in the pipe, tomorrow they quietly re-buried something else, it will be impossible to track, even if in parts bring new and collect directly in the mine. And no one says that it will be in a year ... and there you can bungle a new system, while the tubes are placed along the border ...
                    1. postman
                      postman 22 October 2013 23: 48
                      +1
                      Quote: El13
                      Well, yes, yes, but ours are so, for prevention with amers on this issue butting

                      Our task: IN GENERAL TO STOP DEVELOPMENT OF ABM PROTECTION (and transferring it outside the framework of the ABM Treaty to other countries, moreover) = WE JUST HAD (economically) to overpower an adequate response, and nuclear weapons are our deterrent
                      Quote: El13
                      Well, they’re also scaring neighbors with Iskanders,

                      Well, what it is, they scare it, so what if Poland, Romania and others like them are donkeys.
                      (Norway doesn’t want to bet, but it’s convenient to intercept from there)
                      Quote: El13
                      what the Patriots put

                      Patriot does not contradict the ABM Treaty, we have an answer
                      Quote: El13
                      Today, a kinetic interceptor is buried in the pipe, tomorrow they dug something else quietly, it will be impossible to track,

                      -all tracked
                      -It is not so easy to convert the interceptor shpu under the BR shpu. These are the legends of our newspapermen.
                      ---- and who, in this case, prevents the "sly" pershing -3 "bungling?
                      Quote: El13
                      and collect right in the mine

                      ettt is not possible. It’s probably not possible to bungle (if you fantasize), ONLY WHERE will it fly? if at all fly
                      Quote: El13
                      And no one says that it will be in a year ..

                      this place is specifically against Iran.
                      both by count and by geography
                      And OUR BR (if something happens) will not be able to intercept
                      1. El13
                        El13 23 October 2013 09: 43
                        0
                        with modern digital interfaces and solid propellant rockets, you don’t even have to redo the mine, take out one rocket in its compartments and load it into trash containers, and then in reverse order to collect another ... yes you can and without hiding - just quickly replace in an endangered period. And against Iran - all this is inadequately expensive entertainment, even taking into account that it is being organized for cutting ... It is unlikely that they will be able to intercept at the active site - here I agree.
                      2. postman
                        postman 23 October 2013 13: 25
                        0
                        Quote: El13
                        and then in reverse order to collect another ... yes you can and without hiding - just quickly replace in an endangered period

                        you confuse the silo missile defense, this is not a code of defense type MK (Arly b.), believe me, I saw silos and not one
                        Quote: El13
                        just a quick change in an endangered period.

                        WHERE IS THE MISSION ???
                        I repeat GBI, SM-3, THAAD - not suitable for firing AT GROUND TARGETS, absolutely
                        all Mudifications are possible only in the inflamed minds of illiterate Russian politicians.
                        We look at (at least) the S-125,200 complex, shooting at ground targets
                        Quote: El13
                        And against Iran - all this is inadequately expensive entertainment

                        just not:
                        there was a crisis, aggravation, in Iran the mind went for reason (well, as in the DPRK), pulnuli ....
                        Quote: El13
                        what is organized for cutting ...

                        I would honestly say about the cut (on our side) SILENT.
                        All these are legends about the United States, "the thief and the hat is on fire", "who is the first to shout: stop the thief"?
                        Here's a fresh one ... Well, 150 times (more than 15%) you can just get stuck (and these are some "pistols"):

                        http://zakupki.gov.ru/pgz/public/action/orders/info/common_info/show?source=EPZ&
                        notificationId = 7226765


                        http://zakupki.gov.ru/pgz/public/action/orders/info/common_info/show?source=EPZ&
                        notificationId = 7226753




                        Well, in principle, the price tag (per piece) here
                        http://www.glockmeister.com/GLOCK-17-Gen-4/productinfo/G17GEN4/
                        ================================
                        I don’t really understand how from the RETAIL PRICE in 549d. the USA gets a special. WHOLESALE price for the RF Ministry of Defense is 5 EUR
                      3. El13
                        El13 23 October 2013 17: 24
                        0
                        Dear Vasily, there is no need to treat a rocket launcher about the impossibility of firing at ground targets, but alterations will be required, but not so significant and something you took up about my only mention of the cut from the states and sprinkled about our cuts, which we are not discussing here? It seems to me that there is something to think about whether you put the flag on yourself ... In short, stop here to treat about Iran!
                      4. postman
                        postman 24 October 2013 02: 41
                        0
                        Quote: El13
                        no need to treat a rocketman about the impossibility of shooting

                        Well, it turns out a rocketman "heals" a rocketman.
                        Quote: El13
                        yes alterations are required,

                        How will you shoot? Ballistic, no backlight?
                        And the alteration is not so "simple".
                        We have already discussed this with a rocket launcher (real), for the S-200 air defense system
                        Quote: El13
                        You got fed up about my only mention

                        ? why?
                        I'm already tired of reading stupid nonsense about cuts in the Pentagon: "Whose cow would moan .. (well, and so on)"
                        Quote: El13
                        It seems to me that there is something to think about whether you put the flag on yourself.

                        And you write to the admins -moders: let them change, by the way, I didn’t set anything for myself
                        Note: and my flag (on this site) can be different, depending on the location.

                        Quote: El13
                        In short, stop here to treat about Iran!

                        1. In short, a penguin, he sits on ice constantly
                        2. I'm not treating anyone, I'm not a doctor
                        3. And what does Iran have to do with it? , yes: Euro Pro against Iran ..... well, this is "lechilovo", this is "not true."
                        SO BETTER?
                      5. El13
                        El13 24 October 2013 21: 14
                        0
                        It’s a clinical case, so I’ll just allow myself to recall, to remember why the Caribbean crisis started ... and how it ended.
                      6. postman
                        postman 25 October 2013 00: 21
                        0
                        Quote: El13
                        Clinical Case

                        What are you talking about? Umbolchik, or what? I don’t understand ... but I don’t have it

                        Quote: El13
                        recall-remember what caused the Caribbean crisis ... and how it ended.

                        Is it because of the deployment of the USSR missile defense system in Cuba?
                        I missed something
                        ....
                        But how would the USSR react, if the United States deployed (quietly) the PGM-19 Jupiter, let's say on the island of Hogland

                        Huh?
                        Quote: El13
                        . and how it ended.

                        The dismissal of Nikita Sergeevich, for adventurism and stupidity, by the fact that almost did not threaten the first state of workers and peasants.
                        Our retreated prudently
                      7. El13
                        El13 25 October 2013 14: 06
                        0
                        About PGM-19 Jupiter and analogues in Turkey:
                        In 1963, a very short time after being put on combat duty, the missiles were decommissioned in response to the dismantling of Soviet missiles in Cuba.

                        So, really, yours retreated prudently. In general, a compromise was reached by this, it seems to me that this time there will be a similar exchange when ours begin to stuff the Atlantic with bottom ballistic missiles or come up with something else so that the game does not go all in one.
                      8. postman
                        postman 25 October 2013 18: 28
                        0
                        Quote: El13
                        In 1963, a very short time after being put on combat duty, missiles were withdrawn from service in response to

                        Oh yes, how many of them there were in Turkey 15 il sixteen.
                        Yes, and Turkey, not Cuba (in distance)
                        The NSC, as always, clumsyly resolved the issue, in a snap.
                        Could have been SITTER and better for us.
                        And the United States would have been more friendly, and the BR in Cuba, I say, is like the US BR on Gogland Island. Who will tolerate?

                        Quote: El13
                        when ours begin to stuff the Atlantic with bottom ballistic missiles

                        The idea is good, but a little expensive and is not technically feasible at the moment,yet.
                        Project XXXX (well, let's say "Sower") what does the thread say? Petersburg development. Not a BR, but I know who, where, when and why.

                        Quote: El13
                        or something else come up with

                        We can’t pull the ABM for now, for this reason (photo):

                        or for this (public procurement):
                        http://zakupki.gov.ru/pgz/public/action/orders/info/common_info/show?source=EPZ&


                        notificationId = 7226765

                        http://zakupki.gov.ru/pgz/public/action/orders/info/common_info/show?source=EPZ&


                        notificationId = 7226753

                        Well, in principle, the price tag (per piece) here
                        http://www.glockmeister.com/GLOCK-17-Gen-4/productinfo/G17GEN4/
                        ================================
                        I don’t really understand how from the RETAIL PRICE in 549d. the USA gets a special. WHOLESALE price for the RF Ministry of Defense is 5 EUR


                        ======================
                        Yes, and it makes no sense so far, against a 500MBR with an RGM, a modern missile defense is powerless.
                        Cheaper:
                        - where iskander needed
                        - air force tidy
                        -MBR
  • Nitarius
    Nitarius 21 October 2013 11: 35
    0
    Shoot SHOULD GO LEARN! in another way! CHOOSING EARLY OR LATE THESE "FRIENDLY JACKALS from USA" could start World War III!
  • maestro123
    maestro123 21 October 2013 11: 57
    +1
    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
    Take another look at the map. Where is Russia, where is Romania and where are the States

    Forgot to add ... And where is NATO.
    Don’t bring rubbish, this is only an element of the global missile defense, the closer to our borders, the more vulnerable our nuclear weapons.
  • Onyx
    Onyx 21 October 2013 12: 19
    0
    Thus, Americans will soon put their missile defense facilities in Ukraine
    1. postman
      postman 21 October 2013 15: 01
      -1
      Quote: Onyx
      Missile defense will be put in Ukraine

      against the BR of Iran, which is in Europe- PERFECT POSITION
      Crimea
      1. Santa Fe
        Santa Fe 21 October 2013 17: 48
        -1
        Crimea is immediately a minus))))
        1. postman
          postman 22 October 2013 01: 19
          0
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          Crimea is immediately a minus))))

          And what changes "-" ???
          Crimea ideal position for missile defense against Iran
  • Clueless
    Clueless 21 October 2013 14: 32
    0
    Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
    Shoot from the territory of Romania in pursuit - meaninglessly
    This missile base is against Iranian missiles.


    launch routes to hell, like nuclear weapons destruction points

    why did you get that nuclear weapons if that current in the US will be applied? ;)
    1. postman
      postman 21 October 2013 15: 03
      +1
      Quote: Bad
      launch routes to hell, like nuclear weapons destruction points

      No. Energy and flying time are the determining factors.
      Start locations: fixed same
      Quote: Bad
      why did you get that nuclear weapons if that current in the US will be applied? ;)


      And against whom?
      Russian Federation against about. Tenerife, Russian Federation vs. Honduras and Brazil?
      Yes. then of course.
      Only here is no problem: there are NO such flight programs
  • konvalval
    konvalval 21 October 2013 20: 39
    0
    Hooters are dummies. They will sell their mother for mamalyga.