The Emancipe project. How and why is feminism promoted
Feminism transformed the traditional family beyond recognition. In this case, neither the weak nor the stronger sex did not benefit from this. Instead of equality, there was a frank bias in the direction of the woman earner and the passive husband. In the United States and Europe, the traditional family goes into the category of pathologies, and homosexual marriages are taken as an example. This trend is artificially imposed by a group of influential banking clans: feminism has become a tool for forging a new society and reducing the population of the earth.Background
The beginning of the "family reboot" was laid in the XVII century. Then the French Enlightenment Voltaire, Diderot, Helvetius and Montesquieu threw the first weed grain, putting forward the idea of an unjust female share. The crop grew in the first half of the 19th century: in Europe and the United States, green shoots — women's public organizations — began to break through here and there. The main task of the “emancipe” of that period was to obtain the desired suffrage. There were two main currents of feminism - the liberal and the Marxist. The first was incidentally in the West, where activists were intellectuals from high society. The second was guided by women from the people and got accustomed in Russia and other countries that later joined the social camp. At the same time, liberal women and Marxists hated each other with terrible force: Western ladies looked down on the East, and Marxists considered liberals as parasites on the body of society.
Two world wars somewhat besieged the enthusiasm of the feminists. As they say, it was not fat, the traditional family came to the fore again. But not for long. Already by the 1960 years, a second wave of feminism struck the West. If women first sought the right to vote, now they have desired the right to be elected. Theorists, on the other hand, rushed out in the invention of new feminist concepts. Postmodern, psychoanalytic and radical movements saw the light. As for the third wave of feminism, it came at the beginning of the 90s of the last century and is still ongoing. Its difference from the previous ones is orientation to the countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Grooms to issue
Over the past three decades, feminism has changed the social and labor panorama of the West beyond recognition. The Pew Research Center study entitled “New Family Economy: Promoting Women” (January 2010) clearly demonstrates this. If in the 1970, in the USA, only 4% of men had more accomplished and wealthy wives, then in 2007, they already counted 22%. Incomes of women for 30 years increased by 44%, for men the dynamics was only 6%. In particular, the annual income of unmarried women increased from $ 30,5 thousand to $ 48,7 thousand, married women - even more, from $ 45,7 thousand to $ 74,6 thousand (from 1970 to 2007 a year).
In Russia, such studies have not been conducted, but we have already seen a similar trend. In the period from 2000 to 2007, the stronger sex consistently overtook the weak unemployment rate. Even in the crisis year 2008, women were more successful in using themselves (6,4% of unemployed women versus 7,5% of not working men).
Soon, “get married successfully” will go into the category of archaisms, and the “grooms to the marriage” will become the norm. Moreover, more and more men are looking for just such a marriage. In social psychology, the drone syndrome is called the “crisis of masculinity”. Scientists promise that this deviation will only progress over time. After all, today ideal conditions are created for the breeding of parasitic husbands. "Studies show a general trend: increasing educational and career opportunities for women and the desire of men to share the financial burden with future spouses," said sociologist Christine Whelan of the University of Iowa. In turn, Richard Fry of the Pew Research Center enjoys new perspectives: “Today, most wives are working. For guys, the economy of marriage is becoming increasingly profitable. " (Chicago Sun-Times, January 23, 2010 of the year).
The "casting" of brides is changing radically. Now the criteria for the selection of the future wife are grouped around education, finance and performance. According to the Pew Research report, in 2007, only 19% of women had more educated husbands, while 28% lived with less developed creatures. Forty years ago, it was the opposite. In 1939, the item “financial prospects” took 18-e place in the list of men's priorities when choosing a future spouse. In 2008, the suitors became more practical, and the “money question” moved to the 12 place — such data is given in a February study by the University of Iowa.
Emancipation of happiness
Unfortunately, the "promotion of women" does not promise ladies special joy. Often, after work, the “breadwinner” becomes the “keeper of the hearth” and performs housework. In turn, the “breadwinner” is transformed into a “guardian of the sofa and TV”. It turns out that the ladies dutifully took over the complex of traditionally female concerns and men's duties. Plus, the concept of “female” and “male” wages still exists in society. The Pew Research Center calculated that in the US in the 2007, the “weak half” salary was 78% of the “strong” salary in a similar position.
The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness Paradox is the study of sociologists Betsy Stevenson and Justin Wolfferz from the National Bureau of Economic Research USA, published in May 2009. According to the data provided in it, even 35 years ago in the USA and 12 EU countries there was an obvious trend of women's dissatisfaction with their own lives. “Traditionally, women showed a higher level of happiness than men, but today everything has changed in the opposite direction,” the authors write. Based on surveys over the past 35 years, scientists deduced specific values - the coefficients-trends of the comfortable self-perception of the respondents. So, in 12 of the most developed countries of the European Union, the “life satisfaction rate” for women was lower than for men.
Feminism not only causes the blues in women, but also undermines their health. In March, 2007, scientists at the Swedish Institute of Sociology and Medicine compared the data to employees of all 290 Swedish municipalities on nine counts. It turned out that leveling the difference in income and career opportunities between the sexes reduces the life expectancy of both. A man suffers from loss of responsibility for his family. A woman bends under the weight of stress and stress.
Makers of feminism
Thus, a family with a passive husband and a working wife is not consistent with the laws of nature. It turns out that someone persistently implants emancipation by artificial means. In an interview with Alex Johnson on January 29, 2007, director and producer Aaron Rousseau revealed that the emancipation was inspired by the Rockefeller family clan. According to Rousseau, his friend Nicolas Rockefeller himself told him about the goals of artificial emancipation: to attract additional tax revenues and to be able to impose his own version of the education of future generations. Recall that three months after the interview, Rousseau died of cancer.
It is not excluded that Nicholas Rockefeller himself boasted a little, and the “emancipe” program is being promoted not by him alone, but by a whole group of bankers from the USA and Europe. At the same time, he can not be accused of low-priced bragging. There are facts that confirm his words. Today, the Rockefeller Foundation sponsors more 48 organizations, community, government and academic institutions that in one way or another lobby further emancipation throughout the world (see Grant and Grantees, www.rockefellerfoundation.org). For example, one of the latest grants is $ 3 million for the US State Department's program for the emancipation (liberation) of women and girls. The funds will go to the awards for the most active lobbyists.
The version that feminism is only a tool to reduce the population of the planet deserves no less attention. In September, 2009, Dr. Leonard Horowitz openly declared that the financial elite launched a massive genocide (see www.drlenhorowitz.com). The process is led by the Rockefeller clan, which controls all global social, genetic and biotechnological trends. According to Horowitz, who he provided to the FBI, David Rockefeller Trust Company is leading a program to reduce the world's population (in particular, through mass vaccination).
If you believe Horowitz, then we are talking about the implementation of the “golden billion” scenario - the survival of the most developed countries of Europe and America in the face of resource depletion. They will be saved at the expense of other states: to slow down their development, to reduce fertility and consumption. The corresponding doctrine was formulated by the Englishman Thomas Malthus as far back as 1798, justifying it in the Treatise on the Principles of Population.
Midwife from hell
The most ambitious project to reduce the "livestock of people" is implemented by the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). The ancestor of IPPF is feminist Margaret Zanger. She was born in 1879, near New York, she adored eugenics and Thomas Malthus, considered marriage a "degenerative institution", a "oppressive core of marital fidelity." Despite her persistent aversion to the family, Sanger was twice married, the second time for millionaire J. Noah Slee, who helped her in the struggle for the purity of the human race.
In May 1934, in American Weekly Magazine, Margaret published an article with legislative proposals. Zanger considered it necessary to “stop the overproduction of children” and introduce birth permits, suggested sterilization of sick and handicapped people (as such she considered 70% of the US population). In her book, The Woman and the New Race (published in 1928), Margaret wrote that "the greatest benefit that a large family can provide to a newborn is to kill him." For IPPF, Margaret Sanger is an apologist, and her activities are based on her postulates.
The organization saw the light in 1921, under the name "Birth Control League". In 1942, it was renamed the American Planned Parenthood Federation. Already after 10, IPPF saw the light of day, which today is represented in 140 countries of the world, including Russia (Russian Association of Family Planning, or RAPS). From 1925, the organization began to receive grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, as well as Ford and Carnegie foundations. In the report for 2008, the organization indicated 18 states that provided grants totaling $ 91,5 million. At the same time, Sweden provided the largest amount - $ 15,9 million.
The IPPF is mainly lobbying for “sexual health” and “reproductive rights” around the world. The first involves the promotion of sexual freedom and safe sex, including in schools. Various deviations - homosexuality, transsexualism, gender change, etc. - are presented as the norm. "Reproductive law" - propaganda of feminism and abortion. At the same time sterilization acts as the most effective and safe method of contraception.
Igor Beloborodov, director of the Institute for Demographic Studies, editor of the portal Demographia.ru
Feminism - the theoretical justification of lesbianism. The extreme form of denial of the man and the declaration that the woman is an oppressed class leads precisely to the formation of same-sex women's unions. It can be put on a par with fascism and the various teachings of totalitarian sects.
Russia in this respect really looks much better than Western countries. Here, signs of attention to a woman are considered normal and are not perceived as a violation of individual rights. Our aggressive forms of the women's movement have not taken root. In Russia, historically, the interests of women, children and the elderly were carefully guarded, therefore there were never any serious grounds for emancipation. Most likely, in the Russian Federation there will never be such a situation when employers are fined for the shortage of women under the official state quota. However, if you look at the birth rate, then it is the highest in Chechnya and Dagestan, where family traditions are strong.
The Western world is heading downward for degeneration, politicians openly preach non-traditional sexual orientation. The natural increase among immigrants from the Third World countries in Europe is much higher than among the indigenous people. The situation in the USA is the same; the birth rate there comes from Latin American countries. At the same time, both Europe and the United States are actively engaged in exporting their “values” to other countries.
Feminism - the theoretical justification of lesbianism. The extreme form of denial of the man and the declaration that the woman is an oppressed class leads precisely to the formation of same-sex women's unions. It can be put on a par with fascism and the various teachings of totalitarian sects.
Russia in this respect really looks much better than Western countries. Here, signs of attention to a woman are considered normal and are not perceived as a violation of individual rights. Our aggressive forms of the women's movement have not taken root. In Russia, historically, the interests of women, children and the elderly were carefully guarded, therefore there were never any serious grounds for emancipation. Most likely, in the Russian Federation there will never be such a situation when employers are fined for the shortage of women under the official state quota. However, if you look at the birth rate, then it is the highest in Chechnya and Dagestan, where family traditions are strong.
The Western world is heading downward for degeneration, politicians openly preach non-traditional sexual orientation. The natural increase among immigrants from the Third World countries in Europe is much higher than among the indigenous people. The situation in the USA is the same; the birth rate there comes from Latin American countries. At the same time, both Europe and the United States are actively engaged in exporting their “values” to other countries.
Henry McCaw, Ph.D., author of The Brutal Deception: Feminism and the New World Order, editor of the savethemales.ca portal
As a rule, homosexual people try to behave quietly and independently, without manifestations. However, when they unite in social organizations that are sponsored by the financial elite, they begin to oppress normal people. I attribute feminism to homosexual movements. Emansipe also believes that there is absolutely no difference between a man and a woman.
Today, at least in Canada, where I live, all these organizations have achieved that normal heterosexual behavior is considered indecent. As a professor, I once read lectures from a classic by David Lawrence at a lecture to illustrate a positive relationship between a man and a woman. So one of the feminine students accused me of sexual harassment.
Now all these organizations for the protection of the rights of women and sexual minorities are working to ban the social manifestation of gender in general. Both gays and feminists demand equality, while they insist on a single social model of behavior - homosexual.
As a rule, homosexual people try to behave quietly and independently, without manifestations. However, when they unite in social organizations that are sponsored by the financial elite, they begin to oppress normal people. I attribute feminism to homosexual movements. Emansipe also believes that there is absolutely no difference between a man and a woman.
Today, at least in Canada, where I live, all these organizations have achieved that normal heterosexual behavior is considered indecent. As a professor, I once read lectures from a classic by David Lawrence at a lecture to illustrate a positive relationship between a man and a woman. So one of the feminine students accused me of sexual harassment.
Now all these organizations for the protection of the rights of women and sexual minorities are working to ban the social manifestation of gender in general. Both gays and feminists demand equality, while they insist on a single social model of behavior - homosexual.
Information