Military Review

The Emancipe project. How and why is feminism promoted

95
The Emancipe project. How and why is feminism promotedFeminism transformed the traditional family beyond recognition. In this case, neither the weak nor the stronger sex did not benefit from this. Instead of equality, there was a frank bias in the direction of the woman earner and the passive husband. In the United States and Europe, the traditional family goes into the category of pathologies, and homosexual marriages are taken as an example. This trend is artificially imposed by a group of influential banking clans: feminism has become a tool for forging a new society and reducing the population of the earth.


Background
The beginning of the "family reboot" was laid in the XVII century. Then the French Enlightenment Voltaire, Diderot, Helvetius and Montesquieu threw the first weed grain, putting forward the idea of ​​an unjust female share. The crop grew in the first half of the 19th century: in Europe and the United States, green shoots — women's public organizations — began to break through here and there. The main task of the “emancipe” of that period was to obtain the desired suffrage. There were two main currents of feminism - the liberal and the Marxist. The first was incidentally in the West, where activists were intellectuals from high society. The second was guided by women from the people and got accustomed in Russia and other countries that later joined the social camp. At the same time, liberal women and Marxists hated each other with terrible force: Western ladies looked down on the East, and Marxists considered liberals as parasites on the body of society.

Two world wars somewhat besieged the enthusiasm of the feminists. As they say, it was not fat, the traditional family came to the fore again. But not for long. Already by the 1960 years, a second wave of feminism struck the West. If women first sought the right to vote, now they have desired the right to be elected. Theorists, on the other hand, rushed out in the invention of new feminist concepts. Postmodern, psychoanalytic and radical movements saw the light. As for the third wave of feminism, it came at the beginning of the 90s of the last century and is still ongoing. Its difference from the previous ones is orientation to the countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Grooms to issue
Over the past three decades, feminism has changed the social and labor panorama of the West beyond recognition. The Pew Research Center study entitled “New Family Economy: Promoting Women” (January 2010) clearly demonstrates this. If in the 1970, in the USA, only 4% of men had more accomplished and wealthy wives, then in 2007, they already counted 22%. Incomes of women for 30 years increased by 44%, for men the dynamics was only 6%. In particular, the annual income of unmarried women increased from $ 30,5 thousand to $ 48,7 thousand, married women - even more, from $ 45,7 thousand to $ 74,6 thousand (from 1970 to 2007 a year).

In Russia, such studies have not been conducted, but we have already seen a similar trend. In the period from 2000 to 2007, the stronger sex consistently overtook the weak unemployment rate. Even in the crisis year 2008, women were more successful in using themselves (6,4% of unemployed women versus 7,5% of not working men).

Soon, “get married successfully” will go into the category of archaisms, and the “grooms to the marriage” will become the norm. Moreover, more and more men are looking for just such a marriage. In social psychology, the drone syndrome is called the “crisis of masculinity”. Scientists promise that this deviation will only progress over time. After all, today ideal conditions are created for the breeding of parasitic husbands. "Studies show a general trend: increasing educational and career opportunities for women and the desire of men to share the financial burden with future spouses," said sociologist Christine Whelan of the University of Iowa. In turn, Richard Fry of the Pew Research Center enjoys new perspectives: “Today, most wives are working. For guys, the economy of marriage is becoming increasingly profitable. " (Chicago Sun-Times, January 23, 2010 of the year).

The "casting" of brides is changing radically. Now the criteria for the selection of the future wife are grouped around education, finance and performance. According to the Pew Research report, in 2007, only 19% of women had more educated husbands, while 28% lived with less developed creatures. Forty years ago, it was the opposite. In 1939, the item “financial prospects” took 18-e place in the list of men's priorities when choosing a future spouse. In 2008, the suitors became more practical, and the “money question” moved to the 12 place — such data is given in a February study by the University of Iowa.

Emancipation of happiness
Unfortunately, the "promotion of women" does not promise ladies special joy. Often, after work, the “breadwinner” becomes the “keeper of the hearth” and performs housework. In turn, the “breadwinner” is transformed into a “guardian of the sofa and TV”. It turns out that the ladies dutifully took over the complex of traditionally female concerns and men's duties. Plus, the concept of “female” and “male” wages still exists in society. The Pew Research Center calculated that in the US in the 2007, the “weak half” salary was 78% of the “strong” salary in a similar position.

The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness Paradox is the study of sociologists Betsy Stevenson and Justin Wolfferz from the National Bureau of Economic Research USA, published in May 2009. According to the data provided in it, even 35 years ago in the USA and 12 EU countries there was an obvious trend of women's dissatisfaction with their own lives. “Traditionally, women showed a higher level of happiness than men, but today everything has changed in the opposite direction,” the authors write. Based on surveys over the past 35 years, scientists deduced specific values ​​- the coefficients-trends of the comfortable self-perception of the respondents. So, in 12 of the most developed countries of the European Union, the “life satisfaction rate” for women was lower than for men.

Feminism not only causes the blues in women, but also undermines their health. In March, 2007, scientists at the Swedish Institute of Sociology and Medicine compared the data to employees of all 290 Swedish municipalities on nine counts. It turned out that leveling the difference in income and career opportunities between the sexes reduces the life expectancy of both. A man suffers from loss of responsibility for his family. A woman bends under the weight of stress and stress.

Makers of feminism
Thus, a family with a passive husband and a working wife is not consistent with the laws of nature. It turns out that someone persistently implants emancipation by artificial means. In an interview with Alex Johnson on January 29, 2007, director and producer Aaron Rousseau revealed that the emancipation was inspired by the Rockefeller family clan. According to Rousseau, his friend Nicolas Rockefeller himself told him about the goals of artificial emancipation: to attract additional tax revenues and to be able to impose his own version of the education of future generations. Recall that three months after the interview, Rousseau died of cancer.

It is not excluded that Nicholas Rockefeller himself boasted a little, and the “emancipe” program is being promoted not by him alone, but by a whole group of bankers from the USA and Europe. At the same time, he can not be accused of low-priced bragging. There are facts that confirm his words. Today, the Rockefeller Foundation sponsors more 48 organizations, community, government and academic institutions that in one way or another lobby further emancipation throughout the world (see Grant and Grantees, www.rockefellerfoundation.org). For example, one of the latest grants is $ 3 million for the US State Department's program for the emancipation (liberation) of women and girls. The funds will go to the awards for the most active lobbyists.

The version that feminism is only a tool to reduce the population of the planet deserves no less attention. In September, 2009, Dr. Leonard Horowitz openly declared that the financial elite launched a massive genocide (see www.drlenhorowitz.com). The process is led by the Rockefeller clan, which controls all global social, genetic and biotechnological trends. According to Horowitz, who he provided to the FBI, David Rockefeller Trust Company is leading a program to reduce the world's population (in particular, through mass vaccination).

If you believe Horowitz, then we are talking about the implementation of the “golden billion” scenario - the survival of the most developed countries of Europe and America in the face of resource depletion. They will be saved at the expense of other states: to slow down their development, to reduce fertility and consumption. The corresponding doctrine was formulated by the Englishman Thomas Malthus as far back as 1798, justifying it in the Treatise on the Principles of Population.

Midwife from hell
The most ambitious project to reduce the "livestock of people" is implemented by the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). The ancestor of IPPF is feminist Margaret Zanger. She was born in 1879, near New York, she adored eugenics and Thomas Malthus, considered marriage a "degenerative institution", a "oppressive core of marital fidelity." Despite her persistent aversion to the family, Sanger was twice married, the second time for millionaire J. Noah Slee, who helped her in the struggle for the purity of the human race.

In May 1934, in American Weekly Magazine, Margaret published an article with legislative proposals. Zanger considered it necessary to “stop the overproduction of children” and introduce birth permits, suggested sterilization of sick and handicapped people (as such she considered 70% of the US population). In her book, The Woman and the New Race (published in 1928), Margaret wrote that "the greatest benefit that a large family can provide to a newborn is to kill him." For IPPF, Margaret Sanger is an apologist, and her activities are based on her postulates.

The organization saw the light in 1921, under the name "Birth Control League". In 1942, it was renamed the American Planned Parenthood Federation. Already after 10, IPPF saw the light of day, which today is represented in 140 countries of the world, including Russia (Russian Association of Family Planning, or RAPS). From 1925, the organization began to receive grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, as well as Ford and Carnegie foundations. In the report for 2008, the organization indicated 18 states that provided grants totaling $ 91,5 million. At the same time, Sweden provided the largest amount - $ 15,9 million.

The IPPF is mainly lobbying for “sexual health” and “reproductive rights” around the world. The first involves the promotion of sexual freedom and safe sex, including in schools. Various deviations - homosexuality, transsexualism, gender change, etc. - are presented as the norm. "Reproductive law" - propaganda of feminism and abortion. At the same time sterilization acts as the most effective and safe method of contraception.

Igor Beloborodov, director of the Institute for Demographic Studies, editor of the portal Demographia.ru

Feminism - the theoretical justification of lesbianism. The extreme form of denial of the man and the declaration that the woman is an oppressed class leads precisely to the formation of same-sex women's unions. It can be put on a par with fascism and the various teachings of totalitarian sects.

Russia in this respect really looks much better than Western countries. Here, signs of attention to a woman are considered normal and are not perceived as a violation of individual rights. Our aggressive forms of the women's movement have not taken root. In Russia, historically, the interests of women, children and the elderly were carefully guarded, therefore there were never any serious grounds for emancipation. Most likely, in the Russian Federation there will never be such a situation when employers are fined for the shortage of women under the official state quota. However, if you look at the birth rate, then it is the highest in Chechnya and Dagestan, where family traditions are strong.

The Western world is heading downward for degeneration, politicians openly preach non-traditional sexual orientation. The natural increase among immigrants from the Third World countries in Europe is much higher than among the indigenous people. The situation in the USA is the same; the birth rate there comes from Latin American countries. At the same time, both Europe and the United States are actively engaged in exporting their “values” to other countries.


Henry McCaw, Ph.D., author of The Brutal Deception: Feminism and the New World Order, editor of the savethemales.ca portal

As a rule, homosexual people try to behave quietly and independently, without manifestations. However, when they unite in social organizations that are sponsored by the financial elite, they begin to oppress normal people. I attribute feminism to homosexual movements. Emansipe also believes that there is absolutely no difference between a man and a woman.

Today, at least in Canada, where I live, all these organizations have achieved that normal heterosexual behavior is considered indecent. As a professor, I once read lectures from a classic by David Lawrence at a lecture to illustrate a positive relationship between a man and a woman. So one of the feminine students accused me of sexual harassment.

Now all these organizations for the protection of the rights of women and sexual minorities are working to ban the social manifestation of gender in general. Both gays and feminists demand equality, while they insist on a single social model of behavior - homosexual.
Author:
Originator:
http://fincake.ru/d/magazines/88/articles/2788
95 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. andrei332809
    andrei332809 27 September 2013 06: 15
    +9
    such femenists - and I’m not am and I won’t give others. Push the men into the blue hole wassat
    1. Pit
      Pit 27 September 2013 06: 41
      16
      Quote: andrei332809
      and he’s not am and I won’t give others. Push the men into the blue hole

      Immediately as I recall a joke:
      Every woman wants her to have a gentle and affectionate man,
      But only such a man already has his own man.

      Или:
      She needed him to show his courage,
      And he stands so romantic, a teardrop in his eyes and an asshole pen.
      1. old man54
        old man54 27 September 2013 07: 02
        14
        Quote: Pit
        As soon as I recall a joke: Every woman wants her to have a gentle and affectionate man, Only such a man already has a man. Or: She needed her to show his courage, And he is so romantic a tear in the eyes and handles of assholes.

        it’s a joke now, nowadays already, but in fact a normal true man should and can be fierce and merciless towards enemies, essentially courageous, but it can be gentle and romantic with a woman, with his woman (!!), which belongs to his heart! hi
        1. Pit
          Pit 27 September 2013 07: 35
          11
          Quote: old man54
          a normal true man should and can be fierce and merciless towards enemies ...
          but it may well be gentle and romantic with a woman,

          But thanks to propaganda, modern women do not need this. They want a soft and pliable money bag, with limited thinking, that would not get in the way under her feet and pay for her whims and at the same time considered himself m and he was wildly lucky that he has such, once such a "beauty". Society is being reborn, into a consumer society, and every day there are more and more of them. People do not think about tomorrow, they think about today, and everyone only dreams of EATING and SLEEPING, and eating as sweetly as possible, and sleeping as long as possible. Women do not want to have children, because they consider them a burden, and the "man" no longer wants to start a family, tk. this will prevent them from having fun. And the more this becomes noticeable, the more the propaganda of such a way of life intensifies. People forget why they came to this world and the world will soon reject them, we will stupidly die out.
          1. old man54
            old man54 27 September 2013 08: 05
            18
            Quote: Pit
            They want a soft and pliable money bag, with limited thinking, that would not get in the way under her feet and pay for her whims and at the same time considered himself m and he was wildly lucky that he has such, once such a "beauty".

            Quote: Pit
            Women do not want to have children, because they consider them a burden

            well, so this is no longer Womenbut only females, with primary and secondary sexual characteristics of a woman, no more! A real woman, she has a special set of moral qualities, a special warmth of the Soul, and it is in the name of such Women that I want to do and do feats, and not for females with lipstick-painted faces, with rubber boobs and lips, but with a cold look, devoid of warmth (love ) Poems very accurately convey the problem of today's spiritual degradation of human society:
            "Girls boast of strength,
            Boys - manicure,
            Fashionable to be mega-stylish
            Fashionable to be a complete fool.

            Fashionable so that everything is tight,
            Latexney and shorter
            To shine your thighs
            And called "you want"?

            To silicone lips
            And flaunting tattoos,
            Insolent to pass for and rude,
            Multiple spitting and rumors.

            To be called ... well, let's say "macho",
            "bitch" / she / ...
            The search is richer
            and with a Hollywood look.

            Searches - Slimmer
            and with a Hollywood gloss
            To not be difficult with her,
            The semolina was also catchy.

            To hell with love and fidelity
            It is now an infection ...
            In fashion - do not remember the first,
            In fashion - with everyone at once ...

            A place to look for more
            To drink, which is stronger, in the bar.
            Suck in tobacco smoke
            In a glass, stew the Khabarik ...

            Experiments are in fashion
            Search for mega-high ...
            Be not a friend, but a "friend"
            See only on Skype.

            With thoughts - "stand out"
            Stupidly join the crowd.
            Where instead of a book is gloss
            Where instead of the heart there is an abyss.

            Cries of the Soul hungry
            Loud jam the remake.

            How old-fashioned I am ...
            in the world of show-offs and fakes. "

            © Anna Tukina
            1. Apologet.Ru
              Apologet.Ru 27 September 2013 14: 32
              +1
              hi
              Feminism, homosexuality, lesbianism, liberalism - these are all synonyms, denoting milestones of the path of mankind under the flag of anti-Christian and hateful morality on the road to its degeneration ...
        2. xetai9977
          xetai9977 27 September 2013 08: 26
          14
          What to expect when Zverev, Borka Moiseev and Bilan are running the TV tone? A clear "example" for young people ...
          1. slacker
            slacker 27 September 2013 09: 48
            +1
            In social psychology, drone syndrome is called the “masculinity crisis”. Scientists promise that this deviation will only progress over time.


            You're right. Such asexual figures poison and destroy traditional society.
          2. Avenger711
            Avenger711 27 September 2013 14: 41
            -1
            Why don’t I see them? Not watching TV?
        3. Gari
          Gari 27 September 2013 11: 11
          +5
          Quote: old man54
          a normal, true man must and can be fierce and merciless towards his enemies, essentially masculine, but he can be gentle and romantic with a woman, with his woman (!!), to which his heart belongs!

          100500 pluses
          but in general I melt in relation to my youngest daughter, to any of her whims, but for me she is a superhero
          1. smile
            smile 27 September 2013 12: 08
            +3
            Gari
            Well, that's right, it should be so. I don’t have a daughter, but I have a small niece who rides me as she wants, violently disputes with my son that I own her property and not his, and in general, since she is small, she needs me (Slavka agrees, he is older). Once I accidentally heard her bragging to my girlfriends, the story was in the spirit of the deeds of Batman, just as true:))) - I almost got a tear from happiness ... :)))
            1. Gari
              Gari 27 September 2013 12: 21
              +2
              Quote: smile
              Once I accidentally heard her bragging to my girlfriends, the story was in the spirit of the deeds of Batman, just as true:))) - I almost got a tear from happiness ... :)))

              Yes, everything is familiar, for my daughter the most reliable and safest place in the world is my father’s neck, both literally and figuratively
              I like this
              1. il grand casino
                il grand casino 27 September 2013 17: 35
                +2
                Quote: Gari
                Yes, everything is familiar, for my daughter the most reliable and safest place in the world is my father’s neck, both literally and figuratively
                I like this


                I understand that you ... even though mine is more and more on my hands than on my neck. But understand. And you need to pamper them ... And then why give birth if not to pamper)))
          2. old man54
            old man54 27 September 2013 17: 32
            +3
            Quote: Gari
            but in general I melt in relation to my youngest daughter, to any of her whims, but for me she is a superhero

            I think, Gary, that you are raising her very correctly, you thus put in her subconscious the image of her "ideal" man, the image that she principally looks for in other men, when the time comes for this, to look because she will naturally want to see in his chosen one the likeness of his beloved and loving father with all his heart! And the fact that you bathe her in your love is wonderful, so she will feel more like a woman when she grows up. But ... just try not to overdo it and do not spoil her, do not indulge her vices. Sorry for the moralizing, Gary, I really wanted to share my understanding with you! hi
        4. The comment was deleted.
      2. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 27 September 2013 07: 27
        +2
        Quote: Pit
        Immediately as I recall a joke:

        I’m happy a hundred, even though we have so far this phrase is perceived as a joke- Once not Honduras ...
        1. Gari
          Gari 27 September 2013 11: 17
          +5
          For a real man
          Mother Goddess
          queen wife
          and the daughter is a princess!
          1. old man54
            old man54 27 September 2013 17: 33
            +3
            Quote: Gari
            For real Men, Mother - Goddess - Queen - Princess - Princess!

            good Fine said!
    2. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim 27 September 2013 06: 44
      +1
      Allah is great, he certainly will not allow this in himself! Well, something like this!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. old man54
        old man54 27 September 2013 07: 17
        16
        Quote: tronin.maxim
        Allah is great, he certainly will not allow this in himself!

        I agree! good
        1. Aryan
          Aryan 27 September 2013 11: 01
          +2
          And it all started with a good fairy tale about Cinderella ...
      3. Pit
        Pit 27 September 2013 07: 44
        +8
        Quote: tronin.maxim
        Allah is great, he certainly will not allow this in himself!

        I hasten to upset you. Already admitted, only it is not registered. Pido .. among Muslims no less than among other adherents of pseudo religions.
        Islam, like Christianity, is the most successful sect of Judaism. And the goal of these sects has always been the extermination of the goyim, if not to zero, then to a controlled minimum.
        And just such a trend with LGBT people will soon also break all Islamic prohibitions and traditions and begin to degenerate them. Until that happened, only because they do not cut each other badly, and everyone else. do not leave alone. Once it stops then hello rainbow crescent
        You may not believe or say that my brain is dripping, but try to think for yourself.
        1. old man54
          old man54 27 September 2013 08: 32
          +1
          Quote: Pit
          I hasten to upset you. Already admitted, only it is not registered.

          Well, first of all, Muslims call God Allah, in general, and the Holy One believes that this is the common God of all on Earth, regardless of religion and error. Which is actually true !!
          Secondly, He, God (Allah), did not do anything, we are here, people ourselves have fallen so low, and He probably looks at all this disgrace from Above and gives us time to change our minds and correct, if not all, then Chatsi though, maybe to us, Slavs and Muslims. It is very stupid and primitive, to think that He personally will constantly "rake" all our "shoals" for us here on Earth !! And then why are we here, this is our home, Earth, or no ?? !! But His patience is not unlimited, of course, and anger is terrible, probably.
          Quote: Pit
          Islamlike Christianity these are the most successful sects of Judaism. And the purpose of these sects has always been the extermination of the goyim, if not to zero, then to a controlled minimum.

          Well, delirium!!! Islam, as a Teaching, on the contrary, was sent down from Above as opposed to Judaism and Semitism !!! Unlike the modern form of Christianity, of course, almost completely perverted Teachings of the Prophet Jesus Christ. And most importantly, Islam had to resist the open aggression of the European West to the Middle East, in order to prevent them from "reformatting" the cultural code of the peoples of the East, which, in general, all these centuries have been striving for "behind the scenes"! And he, Islam, for a very long time and courageously coped with his task, right up to the 80s / 90s of the last century, when the Zionists still seem to have picked up a key for him, and now we are seeing how Muslims are manipulated by the Naglo-Saxons and Zionists. But it's not over yet, everything very much depends on people, on each separately and on all together!
          1. IRBIS
            IRBIS 27 September 2013 13: 04
            +1
            Quote: old man54
            Islam, as a Teaching, on the contrary, was revealed from Above, as opposed to Judaism and Semitism !!!

            If you have already hit the theological jungle, then I hasten to upset you. Islam arose 600 years later than Christianity due to the fact that the new religion (Christianity), which was invented by wise Jews, was in no way perceived by nomadic peoples due to their way of life and mentality. Changes have been made in relation to them, and now we have another tool of those in power to control large masses of the people. Nothing "divine" - naked pragmatism!
        2. O_RUS
          O_RUS 27 September 2013 09: 01
          +2
          Quote: Pit
          Pido..ia among Muslims


          yes there is such
        3. alone
          alone 27 September 2013 10: 08
          +3
          Quote: Pit
          Pido .. among Muslims no less than among other adherents of pseudo religions.


          homosexuals have no national and regilious distinction. he is also homosexual in Africa. but in most Muslim countries, unlike other countries, homosexuals are stoned to death and considered to be adherents of Satan.
        4. Old_kapitan
          Old_kapitan 27 September 2013 10: 45
          +1
          Minus. Here for this:
          than among other adherents pseudo religions
          1. Pit
            Pit 27 September 2013 11: 40
            +1
            + for your opinion)
        5. Avenger711
          Avenger711 27 September 2013 14: 44
          0
          And in Central Asia before the arrival of Russian boys for sec_s-fun (bachelors) they were legally selling. So fairy tales about Muslim intolerance towards homo are, in general, fairy tales. Well, maybe the Arabs can be executed.
      4. German
        German 27 September 2013 12: 47
        +1
        that’s what I like about Islam so the relationship between a man and a woman and the attitude to the institution of the family ....
    3. old man54
      old man54 27 September 2013 06: 59
      +1
      Quote: andrei332809
      pushing men into a blue hole

      Yes, "men" themselves in our time for the most part leave much to be desired! Where are those brutal males 200 years ago from Russia ?? So, the flimsy-shouldered half-girl, half-man, basically, with female antics. It's sad! crying
      1. vober
        vober 27 September 2013 11: 21
        0
        No, well, not really like that - here I come to the simulator, so many people go to pump up and quite a lot are not flimsy-shoulder. The eye pleases. And the girls also go, although many have decent figures anyway.
    4. old man54
      old man54 27 September 2013 07: 21
      12
      Quote: andrei332809
      such femenists - and I’m not am and I won’t give others. Push the men into the blue hole wassat
      1. MilaPhone
        MilaPhone 27 September 2013 07: 56
        +2
        Patriarchy is when men are at the head of the world. Matriarchy - women. And what is the name of triarchy, when at the head of the world are only pid-ss?
        1. Grigorich 1962
          Grigorich 1962 27 September 2013 08: 20
          +3
          it's called crap complete and the end to all y
        2. Revolver
          Revolver 27 September 2013 09: 53
          +3
          Quote: Milafon
          Patriarchy is when men are at the head of the world. Matriarchy - women. And what is the name of triarchy, when at the head of the world are only pid-ss?

          Yes it was already, even in the Scripture it is mentioned - Sodom. Only this city ended badly. am
      2. Grigorich 1962
        Grigorich 1962 27 September 2013 08: 20
        +1
        Seraphim of Sarov knew what to say
    5. vadimus
      vadimus 27 September 2013 08: 13
      +1
      God forbid us such happiness!
    6. Yoshkin Kot
      Yoshkin Kot 27 September 2013 08: 20
      -1
      the author forgot to mention the huge contribution to the emancipation (liberation) of women of the councils !!!! what emancipation in the "west" achieved only not long ago, we have had it since the age of 17, and kill children and lay sleepers repeat
      1. lewerlin53rus
        lewerlin53rus 27 September 2013 09: 31
        12
        Do not confuse Soviet-style emancipation, where the family was considered the main unit of society and the maximum possible was done to save the family and homosexuality was considered a criminal offense with militant feminism of the West.
        1. vober
          vober 27 September 2013 11: 13
          +2
          The Soviet period was different. And they tried to eliminate and replace the family with the commune - this was still under Lenin and Trotsky. And strengthened the family - this is later, under Stalin. By the way, under Stalin, sodomy was considered a criminal offense.
          1. smile
            smile 27 September 2013 12: 20
            +6
            vober
            No one tried anything, only psychopaths laughed about it, who, like foam in the wave, appear during any cataclysms. The state did not take any real actions under Lenin. And in the fact that in our country for the first time on the planet a woman was granted equal rights to men, I don’t see anything bad.
            And the article for sodomy was canceled after the collapse of the Union. Some of the guys from Ukraine on the site somehow laughed that the first law adopted by the independents after the declaration of independence of Ukraine, the abolition of the criminal prosecution of homosexuals, the new authorities covered their own ... :)))
          2. xetai9977
            xetai9977 27 September 2013 14: 41
            +3
            It is incomprehensible to the mind, how can a man enjoy a man? This is unnatural, and what is unnatural, then with abnormalities in the brain. These must be helped in medical biased detention facilities.
            1. does it
              does it 27 September 2013 16: 32
              0
              Quote: xetai9977
              It is incomprehensible to the mind, how can a man enjoy a man? This is unnatural, and what is unnatural, then with abnormalities in the brain. These must be helped in medical biased detention facilities.

              And the good of it! when the whole of the globe is officially fighting this, and right there in the shade, half the globe is dealing with this! question; who then is fighting this?
        2. Joffrey
          Joffrey 27 September 2013 16: 17
          -2
          It was already under Stalin that they returned to the "family unit of society" scheme, and in 20 years they were in power (Bronstein, Kaganovich, Zinoviev, Sverdlov). They completely destroyed the institution of the family and in every possible way imposed complete depravity. The people resisted of course, but it did not pass without a trace. .Now we are reaping.
      2. Setrac
        Setrac 27 September 2013 10: 42
        +4
        Quote: Yoshkin Cat
        the author forgot to mention the huge contribution to the emancipation (liberation) of women of the councils !!!! what emancipation in the "west" achieved only not long ago, we have had it since the age of 17, and kill children and lay sleepers

        Putting sleepers is a relic of the Second World War, when men were at the front, and women took their place, emancipation had nothing to do with it.
    7. AVV
      AVV 27 September 2013 11: 21
      +3
      The West was preparing this blue trap for us, but it got into it and floundering !!! Now Arabs and Negroes, in the West are the main producers of the population! The Saudis dream of a great caliphate comes true !!! For what we fought for it and ran!
    8. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 27 September 2013 13: 47
      +1
      Quote: andrei332809
      such femenists - and I’m not am and I won’t give others. Push the men into the blue hole wassat


      They themselves "am" just give laughing .

      In the end, it all comes down to a war of sodomites with straights ...
      1. andrei332809
        andrei332809 27 September 2013 15: 27
        +1
        Quote: Geisenberg
        In the end, it all comes down to the war of sodomites with straights

        nuuu, one cannot surrender here. am
    9. Rus2012
      Rus2012 27 September 2013 18: 17
      0
      Quote: andrei332809
      such femenists - and I’m not am and I won’t give others. Push the men into the blue hole


      Well, firstly, you won’t look at many femi without tears, or you won’t drink so much fellow
      But seriously, 3 problems of the West are pushing for the promotion of these ideas (LGBT):
      1. The fact that the "enlightened west" has rested on the limits of growth, and believes that their population is also excessive, if so, then all means are good to reduce it. At the same time, these ideas are being promoted all over the world.
      2. Institute of traditional family (real values ​​of mankind)
      stands in the way of further fooling and emasculating the personality, which means - must be destroyed.
      3. Somehow they are silent about the next component - the elimination of the transfer of material values ​​by blood inheritance. That is, LGBT fellows, who do not have blood offspring, cannot transfer wealth along this line. What they themselves have acquired, they will pass on to their community (themselves like themselves). This is practiced in closed societies such as monasticism, in the caste of eunuchs and eunuchs-khlystov. It is not for nothing that they say that in order to achieve something, you need to "cross the blue field" ...
  2. MrFYGY
    MrFYGY 27 September 2013 06: 17
    0
    “It should be understood that it’s not a good life to become feminists. Not a single woman who grew up in a happy marriage, living in prosperity and at the same time mentally healthy will stand up for the infringement of some of the rights of men, and even more so for repression against Moreover, equalization instead of equality of social rights, freedoms and opportunities is an unrealistic scenario in principle. "
  3. Humpty
    Humpty 27 September 2013 06: 32
    +9
    Who are the feminists? Just lost their sex appeal lesbians, nourishing normal people, like their fagot brothers in mind.
    1. andrei332809
      andrei332809 27 September 2013 06: 44
      +8
      Quote: Humpty
      Just Lost Sexuality Lesbians

      I somehow thought that these were unfortunate girls who received disappointment from the first sex experience. and this so-to-speak psychiatric trauma carrying all life. guys, better "print" ladies! fool love
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 27 September 2013 07: 36
        +2
        Quote: andrei332809
        guys, better "print" ladies!

        And what is blue that is not printed? It seems to me that at conception their head was not so sealed. Read Grigory Klimov, there in detail.
    2. Joffrey
      Joffrey 27 September 2013 16: 19
      +1
      Feminism is primarily a business, people there work in these organizations and receive money.
  4. Valery Neonov
    Valery Neonov 27 September 2013 06: 42
    11
    It's time to follow the example of Belarus and introduce an article in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation for homosexuality plus feminism. And sho, they will have equality and "brotherhood" in the zones.
    1. old man54
      old man54 27 September 2013 07: 07
      +6
      Quote: Valery Neonov
      It is time to take an example from Belarus and introduce an article in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation an article for homosexuality

      why do we need Belarus? The country, under the flag of which you appear here, had such laws and a criminal law norm, so this is simply our already forgotten past!
      1. Valery Neonov
        Valery Neonov 27 September 2013 07: 10
        0
        I agree ... repeat
    2. Avenger711
      Avenger711 27 September 2013 14: 48
      -2
      There can be no articles for sexual orientation; the state has nothing to do in the bedrooms. You will plant for feminism, with all its insanity, then soon you will plant even for thoughts.
  5. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 27 September 2013 06: 53
    +8
    Destruction of the principles of patrimonial, family relations themselves is beneficial primarily to the exploiters, business and, as a result, the authorities. Loners have always been easier to manage, they have less resistance in every way. The most regrettable is that this ideology has already taken root in many, one can say the vast majority. Change it is not possible. Val criticism flies from all sides. To condemn same-sex relationships, this is the road to nowhere, except for condemnation it is necessary to affirm family relations, strengthen tribal ties. This is exactly what modern society does not want. And this is a defeat in the competition with feminism and other crap cultivated on the basis of feminism.
    1. old man54
      old man54 27 September 2013 07: 09
      +4
      Quote: vladsolo56
      Loners have always been easier to manage, they have less resistance in every way.

      Yes, I agree, but not only that! All this homosexuality and lesbianism is nothing but a hidden form of an attempt to control the birth rate on Earth provoked by the world Zionite backstage. According to their calculations, they don’t need so many people on the planet, it’s difficult to manage them and the resources of the planet are not unlimited. hi
      1. vladsolo56
        vladsolo56 27 September 2013 07: 26
        +1
        Quote: old man54
        Yes, I agree, but not only that! All this homosexuality and lesbianism is nothing but a hidden form of an attempt to control the birth rate on Earth provoked by the world Zionite backstage. According to their calculations, they don’t need so many people on the planet, it’s difficult to manage them and the resources of the planet are not unlimited.

        I’m not sure that this is exactly the case, because in essence today the so-called rulers of the world persistently push Islamic ideologies around the world, but this is noticeable with the naked eye. However, it is precisely in Muslims that the birth rate is much higher than in all others. So with the number of people they have no questions, I think, the only question is humility, and here Islam just meets all the requirements.
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 27 September 2013 09: 39
          +1
          Quote: vladsolo56
          persistently pushing Islamic ideologies around the world

          Under the guise of pushing through Islam, they completely paralyze technological progress in the east. Nowadays, not even the most developed eastern country has high-tech production. China is a separate issue. Wherever the United States and Co. supported the Islamists, it all boiled down to the banal pumping of resources, and the destruction of all scientific institutions. And in terms of fertility, this is offset by the rate of fire of the weapon.
          1. SPLV
            SPLV 27 September 2013 13: 19
            0
            Respect! Nice to meet a thinking person.
  6. FC SKIF
    FC SKIF 27 September 2013 07: 06
    10
    The man has his own role - the earner and protector, the woman has her own - mother, wife, mistress. When a person in society does not realize his role, the program crashes and with a high degree of probability there is a break in a long chain of generations. It is interesting, in the other world, that these shell-shocked people will say to their ancestors in justification.
    1. Kahlan amnell
      27 September 2013 07: 46
      +3
      They won't be able to say anything. Ancestors, most likely, will turn away from such "offspring".
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 27 September 2013 09: 41
        -2
        Quote: Kahlan Amnell
        Ancestors, most likely, will turn away from such "offspring".

        A bullseye from an apple tree ...
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 27 September 2013 11: 44
          0
          Learn biology minusers! In normal ancestors, in the moral, mental and physical sense of the word, a child will never grow up Honduras. "And you will recognize them by their fruits ..."
          1. Avenger711
            Avenger711 27 September 2013 14: 49
            0
            What are you saying?
  7. Sunjar
    Sunjar 27 September 2013 07: 18
    +4
    Let it be in Geyrop, America and other developed, civilized countries, but I am happy in barbaric Russia with a wise, kind, tender wife. In these countries, and so sickly pace is replaced indigenous niggers and the Arabs, let them degenerate, they figure rather than the golden billion. True, in Russia, too, many young and not very ladies in reason are not far from chickens, but the requests are quite royal: "I dear car, mink coat, gold, diamonds. And you rag should be happy that I, so combed, are near with you. And in general I have to kiss my feet for all the good! "
    1. Kahlan amnell
      27 September 2013 07: 53
      +2
      This is still an exception, not a rule. Although some people are doing their best to make the described exception the rule. This is sad!
      But we just won’t give up. Let every mother raise her daughters with women - that’s the plans of their sworn friends.
      But you, male fathers, do not lag behind. Raise sons in the Russian spirit - men, soldiers, husbands and fathers.
      1. Sunjar
        Sunjar 27 September 2013 09: 10
        +3
        I agree with you on everything. What can be an example for children when dad gets drunk on the insole and there is no difference between him and a monkey dressed in clothes, when he smokes, swears, dangles on sluts, but at the same time he preaches his child, who naturally doesn’t believe him once? What example will a mother show her daughter when she, like dad smokes, drinks, swears, dresses like a prostitute, cheats on her husband? Just one example: you have to be the same scum as your parents. Only a grown individual with such examples will believe that she does everything right, that everyone lives like that, that he (she) is a free person and himself (a) manages his life. A personal example and competent upbringing, and not a disregard for your children will bring good results. They, too, someday will become moms and dads.
  8. Kibalchish
    Kibalchish 27 September 2013 07: 19
    0
    It's all sad
    1. Revolver
      Revolver 27 September 2013 10: 00
      +5
      Yes, it’s not so bad with you, even though the law was passed on propaganda of pederasty - and that’s the point. And our federal government, led by Obama, has already done such miracles in this regard that it’s better not to remember - it will make you sick.
  9. Denis
    Denis 27 September 2013 07: 20
    +1
    Everything is just a tool of exposure and imperfections
  10. MilaPhone
    MilaPhone 27 September 2013 07: 26
    +2
    Feminist motto: Eggs don't teach chicken!
    1. Yura
      Yura 27 September 2013 09: 34
      +4
      Quote: Milafon
      Feminist motto: Eggs don't teach chicken!

      Egg motto: Chicken eggs trample !!!
      1. Yura
        Yura 27 September 2013 10: 13
        +2
        Quote: Milafon
        Feminist motto: Eggs don't teach chicken!

        It’s a good analogy, so I’ll continue, Krytsa runs, a rooster follows her, then two developments: the first, she slowed down and .... she’s a hen, lays a full-fledged egg in a warm chicken coop, she is fed, watered and cared for in a cozy nest; the second runs faster, and in front of the festive table with candles after it reached the hemp, ax and oven.
  11. plantagenet
    plantagenet 27 September 2013 07: 49
    -4
    From P. Khlebnikov's book "A Conversation with a Barbarian"

    "Pavel Khlebnikov - How do you think Russians treat their women?
    Khozh-Akhmet Nukhaev - Do not protect.
    P X - Yes, this is a bitter truth: Russian girls around the world are slaves. Russian girls are sold on the streets of all cities of the world. Arabs, Turks, Chechens, Albanians, Americans, Japanese, Chinese mock them.

    XA N - Russians do not protect their women. They don’t feel this side.

    P X - What is the difference between Russian and Chechen men in their attitude to women? I mean protection.

    X-A N - Well, there can’t even be a comparison. No matter where we are now, everyone knows - both Russians and others - that it is better for them not to have a relationship with Chechens. Because you can be a victim. Even if there is some Chechen woman as a prostitute, without a family and a family, a prostitute will wander the streets, for any Chechen it is insulting, humiliating. If possible, I’ll shoot her myself so that she does not disgrace our honor

    P X - Why are women in Chechen society so protected ?.

    HA-N - Well, first of all, men create women. That is, a woman is a hearth at home. And upbringing is a woman, not a man.

    P X - And how did the Russian bandits relate to their women? Did they protect them?

    X-A N - The Russians do not have this situation. It seems to me that this moment is lost. Either the Soviet Union greatly finished it off, or the emancipation of women, but they consider it normal that their women are left to their own devices, that they are freely given to anyone.

    Therefore, in any place, wherever we are, in Moscow in the beginning of the 90s, let's say, the most beautiful women were usually next to the Chechens. Why? Because they saw some kind of power in the Chechens. Dignity. With a Chechen woman, she felt confident, protected - both on the material side and on all sides. Why? Because the position of a woman concerns his dignity. If something is missing, it humiliates him. But at the same time, she knows that he is her master. A woman needs a master. The Almighty created so that a man is taller than a woman. And everyone should fulfill their role. She feels normal in this role.

    But Russian men no longer feel this moment. And then the woman does not feel the man whom she would like to feel. She feels him weaker. She does not feel confident. And begins to either dispute something, or say something ... That is, she reacts to a man as a male, and not as a man ....

    And the relationship between men and women, the Soviet Union turned upside down. The state brought up so that the man is no longer the master in his house. The state policy towards women is such that a woman is necessarily right. A woman only needs to contact the police - and even if she is guilty, they put a man.
    1. smile
      smile 27 September 2013 12: 50
      +6
      plantagenet
      Well, why have you posted a quote about how a Chechen cannibal, choking on traditional self-righteousness, raises about “Russian bandits” and why all Russian men are degenerates and alcoholics, and all Russian women are prostitutes? Are you not used to the cheap show-off of some dense savages who descended from the mountains to the Great Road?
      If Chechens break out from under total medieval control, in which they don’t even have the right to sit at a table with men, they behave just like ours ... sometimes it stops only the fear of death, which is very real. If you are a Chechen woman without a husband, there is no one to protect, be prepared that you will begin to steal your daughters, you will practically do nothing. And if you can even return the raped daughter home, then be prepared for the fact that she will not have a future — she’s disgraced ... and the girl can live normally only after leaving Chechnya .... to us, so bad ...
      Not so long ago in the Kaliningrad region was invited to one, in general, a good Chechen at home. Well, the table, that-sho (not without vodka, although in public he swears that he is Muslim) ... his wife fusses around the table and leaves, looks sternly at the floor ... He calls her with a whistle, or Hey. ..i-what are you beating her? Or is it completely brutalized, what did you turn it into? She will run away from your slavery. He-and-what-she must know her place ... and nowhere to run. she will bring her relatives to me, she has nowhere to go .... At my insistence, the girl was seated at the table ... sitting, not raising her eyes, picking her fork in a plate ... trying to talk, she looked at her husband before timidly answering .... so I felt sorry for her ... and will sit for half her life within the adjoining area until her daughter-in-law gets subordinate, then she will come off ... they take her to a store in a car under the supervision of a dzhigit mother ... and she has a medical education ...

      What kind of savagery, in your opinion, is the standard? Is it on such supporters we should equal?
      1. IRBIS
        IRBIS 27 September 2013 13: 17
        +2
        Quote: smile
        What kind of savagery, in your opinion, is the standard? Is it on such supporters we should equal?


        Countryman, do not boil. It's just that many have seen enough of the eastern series about beautiful life. And an excerpt from the book of the American journalist even touches - how unobtrusively and in passing the idea of ​​Russian inferiority is pushed.
        1. smile
          smile 27 September 2013 13: 31
          +2
          IRBIS
          Greetings! Yes, I, in principle, was not particularly fiery, otherwise I would have told the commentator a lot, unknown to him earlier .. about himself :))) I was outraged by quoting a seasoned criminal with experience, a cannibal who might have been able to escape ... why? Or a commentator, a narrow-minded person, or a provocateur, a female dog ... Indeed, the idea of ​​the inferiority of Russians is the main essence of what this Khlebnikov wrote, who was actually "renamed" from "Paul" to "Paul" ...
          1. plantagenet
            plantagenet 27 September 2013 19: 46
            -2
            You do not agree with this:
            "Yes, this is the bitter truth: Russian girls all over the world are slaves. Russian girls are sold on the streets of all cities in the world. Arabs, Turks, Chechens, Albanians, Americans, Japanese, and Chinese mock them."
            Or with this:
            "And the relationship between men and women was turned upside down by the Soviet Union. The state brought up so that a man is no longer the master of his house. The state policy towards women is such that a woman is necessarily right. A woman should only turn to the police - and even if she is to blame put the man in prison. "
            1. smile
              smile 27 September 2013 23: 44
              +1
              plantagenet
              Yes. I do not agree with this. With rare exceptions, a Russian woman is free to choose her own destiny ... if some peck on show-offs, it’s clear who, what can you do, let go of the guts, not forgetting to rape, as is customary among the ones you quote? Especially. that Russia doesn’t belong to the palm of prostitution — they simply call everyone from the former USSR Russians and Lithuanians and Ukrainians and everyone else ... didn’t you know? there are hardly any more Americans in this industry, so what? do they yell that there is nobody worse than them?
              In the second paragraph, it’s even simpler: during the Union, women were equated with men for the first time on planet Earth, and I think this is right. There are separate costs, but not where you indicated (your examples are incorrect), but only in one case, when determining in court the place of residence of children in case of divorce. The father’s chances are minimal ... but this is another story that cannot make him believe the words of the criminal and the ardent Russophobe who put his life to spoil the Russians .... I hope. what put it. Reliable evidence that this killer got his. still no ... That's it.
      2. Joffrey
        Joffrey 27 September 2013 16: 23
        +1
        Decent answer, respect. good
    2. Avenger711
      Avenger711 27 September 2013 14: 50
      +2
      The Chechens can no longer without self-boast, they have nothing else.
  12. andruha70
    andruha70 27 September 2013 08: 10
    0
    Women's income over 30 years increased by 44%, for men, the dynamics was only 6%
    just an advertisement for avon flashed, buy our set of "plaster" minus 31% and take it to your girlfriends and neighbors and you will have success and joy ... laughing
    married - even more, from $ 45,7 thousand to $ 74,6 thousand (from 1970 to 2007).
    Well, pralna, they will take money for their first "set" from her husband. lol
  13. old man54
    old man54 27 September 2013 08: 14
    +1
    the article is very timely and correct! "+" !!!
    That's how it all started, but we always and how usually lie, not telling the truth, manipulating us and pushing us to where 1% of the population of people on Earth is needed.
    1. Heruvim
      Heruvim 27 September 2013 09: 26
      0
      Old man - yes you look already in senility !!!
    2. lewerlin53rus
      lewerlin53rus 27 September 2013 09: 38
      +2
      Well, the origin of the holiday may be like that, but in our country it has become a normal, beloved holiday.
    3. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 27 September 2013 09: 55
      0
      Quote: old man54
      So, roughly, it all started, but we always and how usually lie, not telling the truth,

      It started a little bit wrong. Look at the founders of the holiday on March 8. Then remember February 23, and who established it. Leo Bronstein-Trotsky. Count the days between these holidays. 14 days. The answer is Holiday is one, only in different styles. This is PURIM. “The devil’s biggest trick is to make him believe that he doesn’t exist.” As a result, the whole world celebrates purim without knowing it. Anyone interested, look at the history of this holiday, very exciting.
    4. Setrac
      Setrac 27 September 2013 10: 55
      +2
      Quote: old man54
      the article is very timely and correct! "+" !!!
      That's how it all started, but we always and how usually lie, not telling the truth, manipulating us and pushing us to where 1% of the population of people on Earth is needed.

      Let's turn our attention to such a beloved holiday as the New Year. The holiday was introduced by Peter the Great, Year is God in Western languages, so on January 1 we all congratulate each other on the new Jewish god. In Russian, instead of the word year, the word summer was used, and the calculation did not go in years, but in years.
      And there are many such examples - senile holidays.
      1. old man54
        old man54 27 September 2013 17: 49
        0
        Quote: Setrac
        Let's turn our attention to such a beloved holiday as the New Year. The holiday was introduced by Peter the Great, Year is God in Western languages, so on January 1 we all congratulate each other on a new Jewish god.

        I absolutely agree with you! good I knew about NG, but the topic is simply about women, and not about the general distortion of the history and meaning of life on Earth. hi
        1. Setrac
          Setrac 27 September 2013 19: 02
          0
          Quote: old man54
          I absolutely agree with you! I knew about NG, but the topic is simply about women, and not about the general distortion of the history and meaning of life on Earth.

          My message was that if someone doesn’t like a holiday, then he may not celebrate it.
          1. old man54
            old man54 28 September 2013 00: 38
            0
            Quote: Setrac
            if anyone doesn’t like a holiday, then he may not celebrate it.

            yes no, I really like the holiday "March 8", we, the Slavs, put our Souls into it and it became very feminine and real! And by the way, nowhere else in the former USSR is it so large-scale and so truly celebrated, even in its homeland, in Germany. I originally meant something else, that the Jewish community in those days created a theory of general equality, including between the sexes, and under this idea they also muddied this holiday - International Women's Day! But women had their rights even then, they for the most part felt great in normal patriarchal families, if they were loved, happy and surrounded by the care of their man! But then they came up with a pseudo-idea, like a woman is oppressed in the world, that she should be equal to a man in everything, become practically a man, and then only she will not become happy, like! negative crying The result of all these Zionist ingenious troubles we observe today: families are not created; if they are created then for a year / two; women puzzled mat. well-being, personal career and unwilling to give birth to children; states where this theory received the most support is really dying out (including Russia); blurring the line between a man and a woman, the imancipation of women and the appearance of more feminine men have led young people to experience + media propaganda that does not perceive the difference between the opposite sex and their own, and begins to practice same-sex relationships, various perversions! And all this in the end for the general degradation of mankind, blurring the line between nations and peoples, between a man and a woman, so that the Zionists reign over this amorphous herd, which they have long been fighting! It’s sad, but ... it won’t be like that, I know. Personally, I better pour blood over the Earth, but this can’t happen !!!
  14. major071
    major071 27 September 2013 08: 21
    +7
    Quote: Milafon
    And what is the name of triarchy, when at the head of the world are only pid-ss?

    This is called the end to all universal values, such as a traditional family, normal relations between a man and a woman, etc. etc. In short, everyone is a big piz.ets! stop
  15. Grigorich 1962
    Grigorich 1962 27 September 2013 08: 23
    +5
    A wonderful article and what is especially nice, a woman wrote it. A big plus for her.
  16. zav
    zav 27 September 2013 09: 11
    0
    ... not everything is so gloomy! In recent years, overseas from the most developed world power came encouraging information about the incredible development of the feminist movement there. Women want to do without men. And what about love? - the inquisitive reader will ask. But no way! There is none, and it was not. A woman does not love, but suffers a man. For a woman, love is the need for protection, help, and food. And for a man you know what. Now specialized institutions can take care of a child of any age. A woman does not need to demand prey from a man. Women can provide food for themselves and children with their own hands. The state helps them in every way possible. As soon as the need for a man, as a getter, has disappeared, the cohabitation agreement (or marriage contract, if this term is more pleasant by ear) is terminated. Soon the men will begin to drive them home from home. Like drones. The era of militant feminism has begun. American women are confident that they can do without men. And scientists (by the way men) contribute to this confidence. When all the hard work is taken over by the mechanisms and computers, and the women will accumulate muscle mass, it will become clear to everyone that the man in society is ballast. And when women can become pregnant without any involvement of men, using only their own genetic potential (of course, only girls will be born), it is quite possible that the history of the Earth will make another turn and the second golden age will come. Without men. Mother nature knows what to do with ballast. Be sure, the second time nature will not make a mistake.
    But before this, humanity still needs to live outrunning itself in the race for survival.

    proza.ru/2010/07/30/907
  17. erased
    erased 27 September 2013 09: 12
    +2
    No matter how you rip off the masks from the representatives of the banking "elite" of the world, they still do their job and promote their interests. Russia is still holding on because of strong traditions, although there are already enough homosexuals and supporters of New Femenism here. And it’s sickening to talk about demography - the birth rate is minimal. And so far no desire to rectify the situation is visible.
  18. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 27 September 2013 10: 30
    0
    The same story as with drug addiction. Darwinism to the extreme - those who are led to the propaganda of feminism simply do not multiply. Or the fruits of reproduction, so to speak, are not viable ... How to react? How strong, viable, healthy people should react. Not to ignore, not to "be higher" is just an animal reaction. The reaction of a person, a social being, is the use of reason and forces for the survival of the species. That is, a struggle. Feminism is not just a social movement, it is an open enemy, the spread of its ideas is no different from the spread of heroin. With the realization of this immutable fact, you need to start building responses.
  19. Gunxnumx
    Gunxnumx 27 September 2013 10: 36
    +3
    remembered a short joke: The triumph of feminism - a woman-fag
  20. Cuban
    Cuban 27 September 2013 10: 37
    -1
    Oh yes, why all this highbrow reasoning? At the simplest level, feminism blooms and smells, and you say ..
    There was an article about Caucasians this morning. And there we, men, women begin to give advice on how to do what!
    To which I blame one, that you go go about your own business, do not go into your own business! Will you still advise here ..
    So what? Zaminusovali !!! And her vice versa.

    http://topwar.ru/33584-neozhidannyy-povorot-v-dele-ob-ubiystve-desantnika-v-sara
    tovskoy-oblasti-ili-nevyuchennye-pugachevskie-uroki.html # comment-id-1521464

    But this is not a plus point.
    If you at the simplest level will not allow women to go into the wrong, then there will be no feminism no matter how hard you try.
    1. Old_kapitan
      Old_kapitan 27 September 2013 11: 18
      +1
      If you at the simplest level will not allow women to go into the wrong, then there will be no feminism no matter how hard you try.

      Quite "scarlet", or are you pretending?
      1. Cuban
        Cuban 27 September 2013 11: 42
        -1
        The deer is right here you are! If there is any question about what I wrote, say it, but if not, then go ahead. Let's goodbye
    2. smile
      smile 27 September 2013 13: 04
      +2
      Cuban
      I clicked on your link ... the girl you tried to send one hundred percent right under the bench there! Do you really think that her almost cry of the soul is a manifestation of feminism? And you led there absolutely rude, correctly she ignored you ...
      Tell me, do you need a wife — a wordless slave who does not have the right to vote, or a smart friend with a strong character?
      One gets the feeling that you and the women are not very ... excuse me ...
      1. Cuban
        Cuban 27 September 2013 14: 14
        0
        smile
        Fine! Nice to read you.
        To the girl (or woman) of that I specially wrote in a boorish way. In order that she would not think that I am trying to enter into dialogue with her and to prove something to her there. For me, there can be no other opinion. She should not meddle in such matters, period. This is not her business. And she can’t say anything sensible here. There is a famous picture on the Internet that partially explains its action. I specifically cite it here as a link, not a picture:

        http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YoozBBAzX0w/T86IcqPi7DI/AAAAAAAAAH8/I1Zqia_k_BU/s1600/
        Q8Tub-cfTyk.jpg

        So, they gave the girl a try and she went away in the opinion that she said something right and that this should be done in the future, on occasion. And if you have not seen, then I clearly see in her act the beginnings of feminism, the desire to equalize myself in law with men. And you were quite enough talking about the dumb slave. In my opinion, when women go about their business (comfort at home, raising children (but to a certain extent), cooking, own work, education, etc.) they are wonderful! No one can do it better than them! And this is absolutely their field of activity. But when they climb into the affairs of men, they are terrible!
        1. smile
          smile 27 September 2013 14: 39
          +1
          Cuban
          You know, to be honest, I don't see anything wrong with that. that women have equal rights with us. Or rather, I think that it should be so. A woman who, in the words of the Germans, Children, the kitchen of the church, is not interesting to me, is often chicken. I only communicate with bright, multifaceted personalities with whom you can communicate on the same level ... and I always listen to their opinion, and do not say, "none of your business, march to the kitchen." By the way, some of them can quite professionally knock out the average man, and I'm proud of that. With all this, they are quite feminine, they pay due attention to both cuisine and children, and together they hate feminists (they do not despise, but they hate, perceive their existence as a personal insult) ...
          I will only be glad if I made a mistake interpreting your statement.
          But here with your opinion, that raising children is a female affair, I strongly disagree. The non-participation of men in raising children is always very detrimental to children.
          1. Cuban
            Cuban 27 September 2013 15: 17
            +1
            smile
            Yes, so I see that we generally agree with you. The only difference is that I am a little stricter towards women. To their behavior. But I have Tatar roots, maybe that's why. And so I, just like you, think that raising children in general and especially boys MUST be a man. And with regard to boys, even more likely only a man. And the concept of "educating" does not mean our "grew up and okay", but that would be something like this:

            http://youtu.be/00EJQqDZpG8

            That is why I specifically noted in brackets in my previous comment that women should raise children only to a certain extent. Those. boys only while they are very small. Because it is our scourge that Russian guys are brought up by women before they are fully grown. I am categorically against this.
            And I love smart women just like you. That's why I wrote in the comment above that their own education is their business, of course. I love women who do not sit at home, but work, which I again said in my comment above. And about chickens ... Here again, nationality probably matters. Girls who have Tatar blood can be very beautiful and at the same time very smart, with the broadest outlook, but at the same time they have an understanding that they are "for a husband" and not "with a husband." Those. the husband's priority is definitely there. And I can’t imagine a girl or woman who would behave like the one we are talking about from the very beginning.
            1. smile
              smile 27 September 2013 19: 46
              +1
              Cuban
              Eh, would you know what my roots are ... :)))
              Well, the fact that we have in common is very good, I'm glad.
              I am not going to argue with this comment, I agree. but, personally, my women always know that they still like to think that they are "for" and not "s" - a normal woman is a normal woman. even if it is equal.
              And the girl we are talking about just boiled up, and I understand her very well - she didn’t speak about the article (which I didn’t read) but that sometimes there was nobody to protect her from some guests from the south who really lead we are so cheeky as if they want to provoke universal hatred of the Russian people.
        2. Setrac
          Setrac 27 September 2013 17: 00
          +1
          Quote: Cuban
          In my opinion, when women go about their business (comfort at home, raising children (but to a certain extent), cooking, own work, education, etc.) they are wonderful!

          You do not correctly explain! The fundamental right that feminists are fighting for is the right not to bear children. Having children is painful - and if a woman decides, then there will be no children.
      2. old man54
        old man54 27 September 2013 17: 53
        +1
        Quote: smile
        Tell me, do you need a wife — a wordless slave who does not have the right to vote, or a smart friend with a strong character?

        good You, smail, one big "+"! Bravo! But, here I would prefer a woman not with character, but with a strong spirit, and this is far from the same thing. The spirit of a person, in general of a person, allows him to withstand the hardships and troubles of life, so ... hi
        1. smile
          smile 27 September 2013 19: 48
          +1
          old man54
          Thank. I agree.
  21. Max otto
    Max otto 27 September 2013 12: 09
    0
    In May 1934, Margaret published an article with legislative proposals in the American Weekly Magazine. Zanger considered it necessary to “stop the overproduction of children” and introduce birth permits; she proposed the sterilization of sick and inferior people (as she considered 70% of the US population).

    This is a surprise, it turns out back in those years, people realized that something was wrong in the states.

    And feminism is garbage, usually disappears immediately upon meeting with a normal decent man.
    1. Avenger711
      Avenger711 27 September 2013 14: 52
      0
      It does not disappear, because the brains are on one side.
      1. Max otto
        Max otto 27 September 2013 22: 11
        +1
        Those who have brains on one side do not need those, this also concerns men.
  22. IRBIS
    IRBIS 27 September 2013 13: 27
    +1
    I like women. I really love women. C has always slept with women, if you can call it that. And, like an old, "terry" lesbian, I say that I have never seen anything wrong with the fact that a woman has her own opinion and her rights. But feminism is not an opinion and is certainly not right. This is already bl ... at some ...
    1. old man54
      old man54 27 September 2013 18: 00
      0
      Somewhat disagree with you, Alexander, I'm sorry!
      Quote: IRBIS
      But feminism is not an opinion, and it is absolutely not right. This is already bl ... at some ...

      no, I think that femenism is not a "struggle for the rights" of women, real women in relations with real men have 100 times more rights than the same femenists !! Femenism is the struggle of "women" for male rights, so that they can appropriate some of them for themselves, thereby becoming, as it were, more men, but in fact they are killing their feminine in themselves, becoming "neither fish nor meat"! hi
  23. builder
    builder 27 September 2013 14: 40
    0
    "The End of Feminism. How a Woman Differs from a Man" Nikonov A.P.
    A very good book on feminism. I recommend reading.
  24. knn54
    knn54 27 September 2013 14: 43
    +1
    Well, here is another type of weapon of mass destruction of people.
  25. Alexandr73
    Alexandr73 27 September 2013 14: 50
    0
    Lord Baskerville, addresses Barrymore: Tell me, dear Barrymore, what is this noise in the street?
    This is the LGBT people who have come to the demonstration and demand rights and freedoms, sir.
    And they have no rights Barrymore?
    There is sir.
    So why are they making noise?
    3,14 darasy sir.
  26. Avenger711
    Avenger711 27 September 2013 15: 03
    0
    Feminism is a complex of female inferiority that has recently grown into an overt demand to put women in power, because they won’t go into slaughter. The problem is that dressing up with the peasants that they supposedly can do men's work no worse, the women do not understand that the men are well aware that there are 100500 things that they do worse than the women, but this does not change the peasants themselves. The male continues to be a male, a prey, and primarily a defender (in societies of light hoe farming, men and women do not live together at all, because the role of the prey is reduced, but what they brought from the hunt is for the whole tribe). If a woman climbs in his place, then the peasant may miss her, but he won’t do the woman’s work himself, or rather, he does her work on the basis of the residual principle, to cook food, or not to have a woman next to a baby. That is, a man will do a woman’s work if necessary, physical strength is not required, a set of instructions is enough, but a man’s woman does not have enough, physical data is not enough. Certain women, of course, are able to do men's work, and peasant colleagues, as a rule, do not interfere with this, and treat them as equals, but such people either have problems in relationships, or they understand better than other women that at this work 99% of women have nothing to do.
  27. andruha70
    andruha70 27 September 2013 15: 05
    0
    old man54
    So, roughly, it all started, but we always and how usually lie ...
    Ingvar 72
    It started a little bit wrong. Look at the founders of the holiday on March 8. Then, remember February 23, and who established it ...
    Setrac
    Let's turn our attention to such a beloved holiday as the New Year. The holiday was introduced by Peter the Great, Year - God in Western languages ​​...
    people, what are you talking about? fool I personally, poh ... was there a Manhattan in 1857, and what did Trotsky have troubled about purim, and how was it, Peter 1 was thinking about Jews ... BUT ... ON MARCH 8, I congratulate all the girls and girls , girls, women and grandmothers- WOMEN'S HOLIDAY! and they are me February 23, HAPPY MEN'S DAY! and on the New Year, we all congratulate each other! good and no one bothers, about-who, where, when, why and with whom came up with these festivities ... tongue
    1. Setrac
      Setrac 27 September 2013 17: 06
      0
      Quote: andruha70
      and they are me February 23-HAPPY MALE

      New holiday No. what a day of men? Many "men" do not treat this holiday in any way, and some women, on the contrary, have every right to call it their holiday.
      Indiscreet question, have you been in the army?
      1. andruha70
        andruha70 27 September 2013 19: 01
        0
        New holiday, what a day for men?
        you really do not understand what it is about? or trying to be clever? what especially for you, I answer: February 23, the day of the Soviet Army and Navy, is considered a men's holiday.
        Indiscreet question, have you been in the army?
        Well, then I'll be smart ... in our army there were "girls" from the nearest hostel of a shoe factory. And I was not there, I served there ... conscript service ... 2 years ... in the Air Force.
        Many "men" do not treat this holiday in any way, and some women, on the contrary, have every right to call it their holiday.
        but with this, I agree ... with some amendment: not many "men", but some ... hi
  28. DZ_98_B
    DZ_98_B 27 September 2013 16: 53
    +1
    I am an affectionate, kind, gentle man. my beloved wife, about 20 years old, told me that she was a fominist ..... I had to explain to her that she was at home and not at work!
  29. Lissa
    Lissa 28 September 2013 00: 59
    0
    WTF, i.e. Where is The Food.

    What was it? I am about the article .. The first article I am minus.
    -------------------------------------------------- ----

    now they desired the right to be elected.


    Do you feel sorry for that?

    -------------------------------------------------- ----

    “Traditionally, women have shown a higher level of happiness than men, but today everything has changed in the opposite direction,” the authors write.


    A sociological survey in Russia showed that the happiest people live in Grozny. Yeah.

    Do you know how elephants are raised in India? In childhood, when an elephant calf is still small and weak, they tie its leg with a rope to a pole so that it knows its place, so to speak. At first he resists, and then surrenders. The baby elephant becomes an elephant and can free itself from the rope, but as a child he learned that there is no point in resisting, he does not even resist, even when there is meaning. It was about the happy ladies of the past.

    -------------------------------------------------- ----

    According to Horowitz, we are talking about the implementation of the “golden billion” scenario - the survival of the most developed countries in Europe and America in conditions of resource depletion. They will be saved at the expense of other states: to hinder their development, to reduce fertility and consumption.


    The natural increase among immigrants from third world countries in Europe is much higher than among indigenous people. In the USA, the situation is the same; there, people from Latin American countries are pulling up the birth rate. At the same time, both Europe and the USA are actively engaged in the export of their “values” to other countries.


    No. So who do we believe, Igor Beloborodov or Horowitz?

    -------------------------------------------------- ----

    Oh, I can still write a lot on this topic, but it’s better to stay here and go do business))

    -------------------------------------------------- ----


    @smile, respect :)
  30. Lissa
    Lissa 28 September 2013 02: 49
    0
    Quote: old man54
    Quote: Setrac
    if anyone doesn’t like a holiday, then he may not celebrate it.

    But they came up with pseudo-idea, type of woman oppressed in the worldthat she should be equal in everything to a man, to become practically a man, and only then she will become lucky, like! negative crying


    Tell about these pseudo-ideals to women who have suffered from domestic violence:

    Quote: Wikipedia
    According to experts, statistics on domestic violence in Russia are fragmented, inaccessible, and often simply absent [2].

    However, according to the available official data of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for 2008 [18],

    - violence in one form or another is observed in almost every fourth Russian family;
    - two-thirds of premeditated killings are due to family motives
    - annually about 14 thousand women die at the hands of husbands or other relatives
    - Up to 40% of all serious violent crimes are committed in families.


    Summary of all these Zionist ingenious troubles we observe today:


    It’s good that there are Zionists, Jews, Caucasians, Chechens, and Shaitans in the end - there are people to turn arrows on and everything in the world immediately becomes clear. (By the way, in social psychology sales there are studies on this topic).


    women puzzled mat. well-being, personal career


    It’s just that some women can do more than cook borsch and tidy up the house. The need for self-fulfillment is common to all people. And besides, if the husband turns out to be some hopeless goat, she will always have the option to leave, and she will have the strength and finances to take care of herself and her children.


    And all this as a result for the general degradation of mankind


    This degradation is not the first millennium.
  31. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 28 September 2013 04: 51
    +1
    already leave behind women, go about your business, it is painful to realize that for many women the man is no longer king and lord