Military Review

Putin was shown a soldier of the future army of Russia

49
In 1999, the federal program "Century Fighter 21 Century" was adopted. The main goal of the project is to transform what motorized riflemen use in combat conditions into a single integrated system. The soldier of the future will be able to move silently, to be more imperceptible than a chameleon and to possess enormous fighting power.


The concept of a “Soldier of the Future” implies the use of night vision, positioning and navigation systems, improved targeting systems, systems for monitoring the psycho-physiological parameters of a soldier, and new dynamic defenses. The main purpose of the equipment of the future is to increase combat effectiveness as an individual fighter, as well as the entire sub-division.

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. LaGlobal
    LaGlobal 23 September 2013 07: 09
    14
    The rhetorical question: when, in what quantity? Will such sets of specials get first ?! Vladimir Vladimirovich, please - do not delay, let the comrades not delay!
    1. domokl
      domokl 23 September 2013 07: 23
      +1
      Quote: LaGlobal
      The rhetorical question: when, in what quantity?

      But is it necessary? They’re making some kind of electronic monster out of a soldier. It’s some kind of armored personnel carrier. It’s all worth it. Protection, communication, the ability to fight independently.
      Such equipment can and will go for infantry, but to specialists ... Bullshit. Everything else is selected for the task. There is no universal equipment and cannot be.
      1. Ivan79
        Ivan79 23 September 2013 07: 45
        +2
        Do you need it?

        The body armor in this kit is probably not bad.
      2. theadenter
        theadenter 23 September 2013 07: 49
        +1
        There is no and cannot be universal equipment.

        I agree. The specialist also needs the right equipment. Let not the same as that of the infantry. Indeed, quick access to equipment is also very important for a specialist, so that nothing hangs and is properly stacked. There’s no vest with four pockets. laughing
      3. Apollo
        Apollo 23 September 2013 08: 29
        +4
        Quote: domokl
        They make a soldier some kind of electronic monster.


        Good morning everybody hi
        We live in the age of computerization of everything, including in military equipment and weapons. I consider it proper to equip soldiers with all electronic devices. Of course, the main factor is the human factor and electronics will be of great help.
        1. SlavaS
          SlavaS 23 September 2013 09: 35
          -2
          And if the BATTERIES sit down?
      4. StolzSS
        StolzSS 23 September 2013 18: 41
        0
        It’s convenient to shoot from around the corner, it is very necessary, the connection is good, stable and encrypted is very necessary ...
    2. Maks111
      Maks111 23 September 2013 07: 30
      +2
      Wash with electronics overdone. Our economy will not draw so much electronics for every fighter. Go broke. But this is IMHO. it would still be nice to hear the cost of this equipment.
      1. Sergh
        Sergh 23 September 2013 07: 38
        +2
        Quote: domokl
        . For the task, everything else is selected.

        Maybe you're Alexander and right. But the main thing is that all this is in stock, although not 100%. And before completing a combat mission, I myself will choose any part of the kit from the entire set. Well, for the "green" soldier, I will put on a reinforced armor for "maybe".
      2. redwolf_13
        redwolf_13 23 September 2013 08: 25
        -5
        Of course it will not pull because it is not there. And we will be borrowing or exchanging radio, taken from the spirits of each other, as in the Chechen one. You can also support the Georgian connection between the units of the Sotik. And it’s also possible that the economy would not collapse and put on again the uniform of the 40s, but we still have a lot of it in our warehouses. And we will free the warehouses and the economy will not collapse, the corpse cannot die again, the truth
      3. TAGIR
        TAGIR 23 September 2013 09: 36
        0
        Serdyukov promised to throw some money out of personal savings
        1. redwolf_13
          redwolf_13 23 September 2013 12: 08
          +2
          Well, yes. I've already prepared the cart. And what's wrong is written. What exactly? I didn’t see new radio stations in the 1st or the 2nd; The simplest encryption block was not. And the Czechs had both scanners and scrapers. And just as commanders in Georgia used sotics instead of communications, this is already a parable in the Gentiles. Request before writing any mutaten please read and not look at the flag.
      4. Army1
        Army1 23 September 2013 19: 58
        0
        Quote: Max111
        Wash with electronics overdone. Our economy will not draw so much electronics for every fighter. Go broke. But this is IMHO. it would still be nice to hear the cost of this equipment.

        The cost of weapons and equipment of a modern American infantryman is $ 17; it’s 442 rubles, I don’t know how much a warrior costs, and indeed all these tricked things, not for a big war, it really is a thing of the past. that we have what nato, hundreds of thousands of fighters will not run around with this. Most likely, such a group of terminators will cause an air strike and lay hundreds of times more technically backward enemy.
    3. KazaK Bo
      KazaK Bo 23 September 2013 08: 16
      0
      Quote: LaGlobal
      The rhetorical question: when, in what quantity

      The question is rather not in quantity, but in functionality ... Who is the basis of our fighters in the infantry? Do the natives of our unemployed villages and small towns, who have no other alternative, how to go to serve in the army, have many prospects in the qualitative development of the novelty? Or her settings? Or minor troubleshooting? First, they "ditched" their general educational training, and then dressed them in "electronic" equipment ... Will the level of training of these fighters be sufficient to fully use the possibilities of equipping the soldiers of the future?
      1. redwolf_13
        redwolf_13 23 September 2013 08: 32
        +4
        Damn you hear yourself !!!! Based on your words, then all the tanks, missiles, ships, communications should be brought to the trash heap only because we have soldiers from the workers 'and peasants' army. Yes, the soldier needs to be taught, but it's not his fault that the government's course is like that of a drunken crew, "the ship goes where the captain's parrot rules." The soldier urgently needs to be trained on the complexes that will still be created. Cooking one year old only for mob. reserve because there is no point in running around with him. Give preferences to those who have served 5 years or more.
        1. No_more
          No_more 23 September 2013 13: 32
          +1
          Yes, now even first-graders already know how to handle electronics, make the interface convenient and everything will be fine. Now every second electronic navigation is used without any training, the usual must be taken as a basis and supplemented with the necessary for military needs. The difficulty of learning something is sometimes caused by the fact that it is not done for human hands. As one genius Soviet engineer used to say, "He will come up with a complex thing."
    4. TAGIR
      TAGIR 23 September 2013 09: 35
      0
      2000 pieces for airborne
    5. Army1
      Army1 23 September 2013 19: 48
      0
      I liked that everything in the video is compared to the American one. "" "" And I thought we were friends, partners, colleagues "" "" Finally we decided on Potential opponents, for work and in large numbers!
  2. CHIM SMOKE
    CHIM SMOKE 23 September 2013 07: 09
    +1
    What can I say, it remains to wait for these bright times, when the soldiers of the future will be near us, among us, when we become SOLDIERS of the FUTURE!
  3. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 23 September 2013 07: 10
    +1
    Serious outfit! Would introduce her to the Army faster ..
    1. alone
      alone 23 September 2013 20: 37
      0
      quickly only cats give birth)
  4. bars280
    bars280 23 September 2013 07: 15
    +3
    This soldier is not tomorrow, this is a soldier today. These kits are needed now.
  5. predator.3
    predator.3 23 September 2013 07: 15
    0
    Well, it’s impressive, and the weight seems to be normal 7 and 14 kg, if only they wouldn’t let us down with the delivery to the troops!
    1. Lakkuchu
      Lakkuchu 23 September 2013 08: 42
      +8
      A soldier of the future will be able to move silently, be invisible to a chameleon and possess colossal fighting power. We are talking about you smile
      1. predator.3
        predator.3 23 September 2013 12: 07
        0
        Quote: Lakkuchu
        A soldier of the future will be able to move silently, be invisible to a chameleon and possess colossal fighting power. We are talking about you


        And what is not the worst hero to follow! good
  6. Mails
    Mails 23 September 2013 08: 21
    +3
    So you look how, in order, they show different classes of soldier's equipment, you just think well, probably a cool igruha will be)))
    Such a clear division into classes of fighters in our Moscow Region, as in a good game with all the differences)))
  7. SAM0SA
    SAM0SA 23 September 2013 08: 54
    +1
    And how reverently he showed the radio from Elena smile
    1. cosmos111
      cosmos111 23 September 2013 09: 18
      +1
      Putin was shown a soldier of the future army of Russia

      Great news.
      A soldier of the future will fight in the armored vehicles of the future.
      The code will show the president, the armored vehicles of the future "Armata, Boom
      erang, Kurganets. "
    2. gladiatorakz
      gladiatorakz 23 September 2013 15: 27
      0
      Quote: SAM0SA
      And how reverently he showed the radio from Elena

      I checked the elasticity of the damper under the communication complex.
  8. eplewke
    eplewke 23 September 2013 09: 51
    0
    Quote: redwolf_13
    Of course it will not pull because it is not there. And we will be borrowing or exchanging radio, taken from the spirits of each other, as in the Chechen one. You can also support the Georgian connection between the units of the Sotik. And it’s also possible that the economy would not collapse and put on again the uniform of the 40s, but we still have a lot of it in our warehouses. And we will free the warehouses and the economy will not collapse, the corpse cannot die again, the truth

    You forgot to ask what to do with the form. You can buy some jerky paper to wipe your oblique ass * when you see our soldier in a new uniform ...
  9. eplewke
    eplewke 23 September 2013 09: 55
    0
    There is only one answer to the question whether we need or do not need new equipment - of course we need !!! All these electronic gadgets, if you get used to them, learning how to use them correctly can significantly increase the combat potential of a fighter. Although - to determine the location of a soldier, simplify the work and command of the officers. The implementation will be difficult - it’s a fact, but we’ll master it, we will distribute it to everyone ... Although we can kick anyone anyway ...
    1. No_more
      No_more 23 September 2013 13: 27
      +1
      Yes, if they were made humanly, no one is against, but the lotions shown are doubtful. Especially convenience, reliability, weight and energy consumption.
  10. Dimon-chik-79
    Dimon-chik-79 23 September 2013 10: 31
    0
    into the troops and do not drag out!
  11. runway
    runway 23 September 2013 10: 50
    +1
    Good equipment is a necessary condition for successful actions of a fighter in a combat situation.
    It should be appropriate for different tasks, so it should be modular as a "constructor".
    Often, firms that have received an order for the production of equipment so necessary for the troops simply "saw" budget money. And the fighters buy the necessary equipment for cash in stores for hunters and fishermen.
    So in the picture, our Supreme Commander is being pushed in another sample with elbow pads on elastic bands (for symmetry, knee pads are also on elastic bands). If the Supreme Commander had served at least one day in the army, he would have immediately asked the developers to crawl in these knee pads and elbow pads for a hundred meters without straightening them ... But no, he nods again with a sage look. He is not worried about what the fighter is wearing, but "kickback". Again, the fighters run to the cash stores ...
  12. ZU-23
    ZU-23 23 September 2013 10: 50
    +1
    Cho editors slowed down, this news has already been scrolled through all channels)))
  13. DuraLexSedLex.
    DuraLexSedLex. 23 September 2013 11: 05
    0
    I remembered obscene ditties straight, as soon as I read the title "Putin was shown ...",
    ... because of the forest, because of the mountains, a man showed an ax, and not just showed he tied it to *** ...
  14. Flooding
    Flooding 23 September 2013 11: 06
    +3
    I do not like such shows. Sorry about that.
    No specifics, excursion for schoolchildren.
    Well, what's the point, all these gadgets showed.
    Whose filling, what bandwidth, channel security, range of reliable reception?
    Of course, I really hope that the level.
    But no matter how it happened with a modernized SVD.
    - "Better than any American sniper rifle"
    Putin: "Range?"
    - "Range? ... 2500"
    Rogozin: "1200"
  15. krpmlws
    krpmlws 23 September 2013 12: 26
    +1
    Armored helmets could have a larger area of ​​cover. For soldiers, as a rule, everyone has a forehead, for some helmets cover only the top of the head. Attack aircraft could be entered with a visor, much less experience.
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 23 September 2013 13: 03
      +1
      Quote: krpmlws
      Attack aircraft could enter a visor, the more experience there is.

      This is a combined arms model. For special forces a separate line.
      Quote: krpmlws
      Armored helmets could have a larger area of ​​cover. For soldiers, the forehead is usually open for everyone, for some helmets cover only the crown.

      And this is a little strange. Because when information about new models appeared a year ago, one of the advantages was called just a larger area of ​​protection compared to foreign helmets. And here on you ...
      1. krpmlws
        krpmlws 23 September 2013 15: 09
        0
        What is the strangeness actually? Watch the video, the head is not covered enough. You need to trust your eyes more, and not what someone is saying. Our soldiers, moreover, have probably dimensional comforters, especially for winter conditions, which is apparently not taken into account developers. Part of the problem is perhaps the fact that specific soldiers are irrationally wearing helmets.
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 23 September 2013 17: 30
          0
          Quote: krpmlws
          What is actually weird? Watch the video, the head is not covered enough

          This is precisely the strangeness. Because the helmet 6B27 protection area of ​​11,5 square meters. dm, at 6B7-1M the area is 12,7 square meters. dm. In both cases, this indicator is either at the level or exceeds the same indicator of American helmets, starting from PASGT and ending with MICH and ACH.
          Quote: krpmlws
          Part of the problem is perhaps the fact that specific soldiers irrationally wear helmets.

          Especially when you consider who acts as demonstrators.
  16. gladiatorakz
    gladiatorakz 23 September 2013 12: 34
    +1
    1. Why such a big comp? It is already big and heavy, and this is the equipment of the future. It is thrown back on some sort of strings. It is easy to make a screen projected onto the armor plate of the helmet. Send these developers right away for reconnaissance. Sooo many new thoughts they will come to mind after 50 km.
    2. Eyepiece for shooting from around the corner. Fragile crap sticks out over the helmet. Near the face and eyes. Unreliable. 20th century. Again, bring to the armor plate of the helmet.
    3. The fastening of weapons, ties and knives raises questions. Is it supposed to crawl in Plastunsky? Or is it in the past?
    4. A question with ventilation of clothes. On the run, marches, in the summer, in the rain.
    5.A shoes? Underwear? Satchels?
    I didn’t see something breakthrough. It’s true that it’s difficult to judge only by the video, but now there is no time to rummage.
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 23 September 2013 13: 05
      +1
      Quote: gladiatorakz
      You can easily make a screen projected onto the helmet shield

      In the sense of a transparent visor?
      1. gladiatorakz
        gladiatorakz 23 September 2013 14: 03
        0
        Quote: Flood
        In the sense of a transparent visor?

        As an option, why not? It is necessary to have a transparent visor on the helmet, glasses are not so convenient. From dust, splinters, bricks, glass, ricochets, fire, etc. Anti-reflective coating, infrared vision, rangefinders and jeepies, sights, status sensors, even video from a personal drone.
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 23 September 2013 14: 09
          +1
          Quote: gladiatorakz
          As an option, why not? It is necessary to have a transparent visor on the helmet, glasses are not so convenient.

          Too heavy variant. Combined helmet should be light. Otherwise, cervical scoliosis is provided with prolonged wear.
          1. gladiatorakz
            gladiatorakz 23 September 2013 14: 45
            0
            Quote: Flood
            Too heavy variant. Combined helmet should be light. Otherwise, cervical scoliosis is provided with prolonged wear.

            1. Depends on bulletproof glass or armored plastic. Sturmavikam one option, combined arms easier.
            2. And where is the development of support for the spine? The helmet is ideally attached to the costume or one piece with it. Protection against fracture of the neck when struck by a bullet, shrapnel, and sub-snout when worn. The same applies to knapsacks, backpacks. This is not just a bag for junk. There must be a multifunctional transformer. Satchel-unloading-sleeping bag-stretcher-additional armor-life jacket, etc.
            3. the helmet in the future will still grow into a semblance of a spacesuit, or maybe into a light spacesuit. War will be under water. Looking ahead, it is already necessary to integrate the helmet with a gas mask, a respirator, chemical protection and the supply of oxygen or a mixture (for injuries, loads, in the highlands, tropics). It came in handy.
            1. No_more
              No_more 23 September 2013 16: 58
              0
              It is not a good idea to combine a security element and that which provides information to a fighter. It turns out that on the one hand this visor should perceive damage, on the other - it seems to be necessary to protect it.
              I believe that the usual quality of wireless communication is more than enough for an ordinary fighter, and the commander already needs a tablet protected on the inside of the wrist, for example.
  17. No_more
    No_more 23 September 2013 13: 21
    +1
    Electronics is frustrating. Both in size and composition.
    What is needed is every fighter:
    Stable voice communication.
    Navigation beacon.
    Commanders:
    Add an electronic analogue of the good old tablets with maps, navigation and other things he needs.

    All. The main thing is that it works efficiently and is convenient, interference-proof and crypto-protected, has minimal power consumption and cost.
    But I understand that our radio-electronic industry is not ready for this. And that it is not easy, but the requirements should have been just that. This is me as a person engaged in development planning I say.
  18. No_more
    No_more 23 September 2013 13: 33
    +1
    It’s not yet clear if there is a bulletproof vest, why not hide part of the electronics on them?
    The microphones on these darlings also do not inspire confidence, they will cling to the branches and tearing it off will be as easy as shelling pears. No wonder that many specialists use neck microphones.

    And this cursory glance is only at all this happiness.
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 23 September 2013 13: 50
      +1
      Quote: No_more
      It’s not yet clear if there is a bulletproof vest, why not hide part of the electronics on them?

      what can be hidden there? Any box is an additional striking element when hit by body armor.
      1. No_more
        No_more 23 September 2013 16: 45
        0
        I thought about it, but decided not to stop, because it's still not my job, but I can assume that the body can be made of rubber, like in various sports electronics. Yes, I have an ordinary flash drive in such a waterproof housing so it is - they were made for maintenance servicemen, which are worn around objects in any weather. I believe it would be possible to do this for wearable electronics, otherwise it will quickly sweep away a fighter from any soldier like a Christmas garland.
  19. Chever
    Chever 23 September 2013 13: 56
    +1
    An uncomfortable video is shown. Little can be seen. And the lady machine gunner delivered laughing good
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 23 September 2013 14: 06
      +1
      Quote: Chever
      And the lady machine gunner delivered

      I'll try to guess. This moment?
  20. Massik
    Massik 23 September 2013 14: 32
    +2
    Mdaa ceramics 8-10 hits, in the fable, ceramic armor plates crumble and crack from 1-2 hits, if you strengthen it with something, then the weight exceeds the usual armor. The knife in general, hell understand where it is located, not like crawling with it, it’s difficult to get it, we couldn’t do it on the forearm. The attacker can completely drown out the receiving channel and will have to substitute his head in the old fashioned way, and given that he gets used to this crap it will be hard. It's very funny about the machine gunner ".. The machine gunner does not need .. mmm .. such protection ..")); Situation:, you need to cross 100m to the enemy trench, you do not let the machine gun fire from the flank, who will be the target number 1 for snipers and grenade launchers? Enemy infantrymen or an interfering machine gun? You can adapt to this kit if you crawl 500m with a crocodile every morning on an intersection, then at least save your equipment)
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 23 September 2013 14: 34
      0
      Quote: Marssik
      It's very funny about the machine gunner ".. The machine gunner does not need .. mmm .. such protection ..")); Situation:, you need to cross 100m to the enemy trench, you do not let the machine gun fire from the flank, who will be the target number 1 for snipers and grenade launchers?

      Protection, of course, is needed. But is it possible to provide it at the proper level from a sniper bullet?
    2. gladiatorakz
      gladiatorakz 23 September 2013 15: 23
      +2
      Quote: Marssik
      MDA ceramic 8-10 hits, in the fable, ceramic armor plates crumble and crack from 1-2 hits, e

      Ha, if they showed Stalin, then he could offer to put on a talker and try. 8 times. But Putin is not afraid. Democrat.
  21. Kyrgyz
    Kyrgyz 23 September 2013 20: 08
    +1
    If the enemy receives a tablet, then he sees all the fighters of the unit?
    After an obstacle course with drops of dirt and moisture, which "body kit" will continue to function?
  22. sergey158-29
    sergey158-29 24 September 2013 02: 25
    0
    Case NEEDED! good

    Finally they remembered the SOLDIER ... soldier
  23. albanech
    albanech 24 September 2013 13: 49
    +1
    An empty snowstorm came from our officials! How much can you show off to do! Just get angry! am