Military Review

Release from retirement

56
Release from retirement Rumors about the possible resignation of Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov seem completely ridiculous - if they did not reflect the struggle that accompanies Russia's return to the most important position in the geopolitical arena.


On Wednesday evening, an orientalist, a blogger and the author of the newspaper VIEW Anatoly El-Murid published in his blog a message stating that a decree was being prepared in the Kremlin on the release of Sergei Lavrov from his duties as foreign minister. According to the analyst, the attack on the minister comes from the government apparatus - he is charged with an excessively harsh position during the Syrian crisis and the complication of relations with the United States. At the same time, the draft decree allegedly has not yet been endorsed by most of the staff of the presidential administration in Russia.

At first glance, this information is like an absolute fiction - how can you even imagine that President Putin dismissed the minister, who was also the most popular (along with Shoigu) member of the government, so sensibly and professionally pursuing his own foreign policy? Yes, and at the peak of the achievements of Lavrov, after the conclusion of an agreement on Syria? All this would have been the case if not for one circumstance: the sources of El Muride are not among those who sow panic from scratch. In addition, the request to voice this information came from people genuinely concerned about the situation of Lavrov, and not at all from his opponents (the names of people involved in the preparation of the decree are also known to El Murid). If so, this means that some serious game (including hardware) against the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is underway, now it has reached a potentially dangerous stage for him.

Rumors about the possible resignation of Sergei Lavrov already went in the spring of 2011, then this was due to the fact that the Foreign Minister was against the position of President Medvedev on Libya. The head of state, hoping for the promises of the Americans "not to take power actions without consulting with Russia," ordered our representative in the UN Security Council to abstain in voting for the anti-Libyan resolution, which opened the way to Western aggression against the Jamahiriya. However, soon everyone was convinced how short-sighted it was to trust a “citizen to a wolf”, and unofficial information about the disagreement with “abstinence in the UN” only strengthened the authority of the head of the foreign ministry in Russia and the rest of the world.

It is difficult to assess how serious the threat of Lavrov’s resignation was then - it’s almost incredible that Vladimir Putin would suddenly agree to dismiss the minister whose position he shared. Moreover, voting on Libya led to a single public dive between Putin and Medvedev - when the then president declared that it was unacceptable to use expressions like “crusades”, adding that some clap their wings on the hull. This was a response to Putin’s statement a few hours earlier, calling the UN resolution “inadequate and flawed”, and the actions of the West “crusade”. These disagreements, or rather, the serious geopolitical mistake of the Kremlin, actually became the last straw that finally convinced Vladimir Putin of the need to again run for president.

Now the situation seems to be completely different - Russia's firm position on Syria is undoubtedly the result of the joint work of the president and the foreign ministry, is in the national interest and cannot cause any tension between the leaders. It is clear that in the Russian leadership, more precisely, in the liberal wing of power, there are quite a few supporters of improving relations with the United States by pursuing a cautious policy and not disrupting globalizers - in the hope that this will lead to a flow of investments and innovations. It is impossible to publicly state this position, either because of its extreme unpopularity in society, or simply because there are no clear arguments in its favor. But you can try using hardware moves to weaken the influence of people conducting the Putin course. It is clear that in the operation with Lavrov — if she is really preparing — not the arguments that are really driven by her initiators are used at all. It is not a question of the excessive hardness of Lavrov (that is, Putin), but of his merits and successes. It is likely that it is generally proposed to mark the head of the Foreign Ministry with an increase - for example, to make Lavrov a deputy prime minister. It is clear that all these tricks are primitive, but ...

It’s one thing if Lavrov gets vice premiership in addition to his post as minister (by the way, Yury Andropov did, who appointed the head of the foreign ministry Andrei Gromyko also first deputy prime minister), and it’s quite another if he becomes just a vice, in charge of foreign policy (a similar option applied to the same Gromyko Mikhail Gorbachev, who made him in 1985 a formal head of state - Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, but actually removed from foreign policy). In this case, supporters of the “soft course” have the opportunity to hold their own person in the chair of the foreign minister.

One of Lavrov’s strengths, especially important nowadays, is his excellent knowledge of the habits and techniques of Americans on the world stage as a whole, and not just in the sphere of bilateral relations, acquired during 17 years of work at the UN, where he dealt with in the Security Council times with the US global strategy. That is what annoys Washington - Lavrov knows their kitchen almost from the inside.

Although Lavrov’s resignation is impossible, rumors about her are very symptomatic. More recently, in June, the head of Russian Railways, Vladimir Yakunin, another close ally, and also personal comrade Vladimir Putin, was also “removed” from his post. Like now, it was done at the most seemingly inappropriate moment - on the eve of the President’s speech at the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, where he announced the launch of two major railway projects: the expansion of BAM and Transsib, the construction of the Moscow-Kazan expressway. It was the opposition to the global infrastructure plans (and it is clear that not just Yakuninsky, but also Putin's) was the main reason for the attack on the head of Russian Railways.

Then even the major media outlets believed in the fake order of the government about the resignation of Yakunin (although, according to the law, the prime minister could not remove the head of the Russian Railways) until after half an hour no refutation was received.

It is no secret that Vladimir Yakunin, who along with Igor Sechin is one of the key figures in managing state assets in the economy and opposing plans for privatizing state property, has serious disagreements with the liberal block of the Cabinet of Ministers on Russia's development strategy. “The global financial and economic crisis convincingly demonstrated the impossibility of going on the path of sustainable development while relying on the ideas of liberal capitalism,” Yakunin, well known for his anti-globalization and statist views, could well say that, but these specific words are taken from Sergei Lavrov’s speech.

Liberals believe that Russia should be smaller than the state, including in the economy. A strong state, and therefore a strong government, in their opinion, only hinder the development of business and the economy as a whole. Better to let the "free hand of the market." Considering that the largest financial and oligarchic structures, which have long been global, are much more powerful by an order of magnitude than the Russian ones (and even more so the banks), it is clear where this hand will come from.

So, a strong state also prevents external forces - why should globalizers independently determine the rules of the game at home Russian power? After all, a strong Russia inevitably begins to build economic and political alliances around itself, penetrate the markets of various regions (including armaments) and support the desire of states and peoples for independence from Latin America to Africa. The construction of the railway in Libya and the purchase of the Serbian railways is a phenomenon of the same order as the SCO summit or the Lavrov talks in Geneva.

So claims to Lavrov and Yakunin have the same reason and the same source. And not to the heads of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Russian Railways, these claims, but to the president and his increasingly clearer patriotic course.
Author:
Originator:
http://vz.ru/columns/2013/9/19/651149.html
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. GreatRussia
    GreatRussia 21 September 2013 07: 20
    11
    ... the blogger and author of the newspaper VZGLYAD Anatoly El-Murid published a blog post about ...

    Is this an awesome "kosher" source to take seriously and even more so to discuss this kind of "information"?
    1. mejik
      mejik 21 September 2013 07: 44
      +5
      Quote: GreatRussia
      Is this an awesome "kosher" source to take seriously and even more so to discuss this kind of "information"?

      Migratory ducks fly. I would not want TOPVAR to turn into garbage from rotten game, retyping liberoid stuffing.
      1. GreatRussia
        GreatRussia 21 September 2013 08: 25
        +5
        Quote: mejik
        Migratory ducks fly. I would not want TOPVAR to turn into garbage from rotten game, retyping liberoid stuffing.


      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 21 September 2013 08: 42
        +6
        Quote: mejik
        I would not want TOPVAR to turn into garbage from rotten game

        Yes, it will not turn out, the article was posted, so that you would understand that not everything can be trusted from the written.
        1. mejik
          mejik 21 September 2013 09: 36
          +7
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          The article was posted, so that you would understand that not everything can be trusted from what is written.

          An article is someone's view. And the correspondence of the views of the author of the article and the media editor often leads the reader to understand the degree of authority of these same views. Moscow Komsomolets, Komsomolskaya Pravda, Arguments and Facts have long ceased to reflect their name and are perceived as frantic yellow paper. There is no proven information, there is no balanced analytics, all the stuffing, ducks, dez, dirt. What to discuss. Rinse once again the bones to someone else. Trash in one word. Personally, I am against such an approach, such an approach reduces the credibility of the media, which is TOPVAR. I believe that the majority of TOPVAR’s audience are mature adults with stable outlooks on life. And they don’t believe anything or anyone for nothing. TOPVAR, to take even me, is interesting in that most articles are written by people with knowledge of business, enriching me with their knowledge, allowing me to stay not far from the topics that interest me that are not related to my purely peaceful profession. Often, comments on articles are more interesting than the article itself, but this is when the pros say their business. And when it is proposed to discuss gossip ... I beg you. Nothing to read. It saddens me. All, of course, IMHO. hi
      3. DEMENTIY
        DEMENTIY 21 September 2013 10: 53
        +2

        mejik
        Quote: GreatRussia Is this an awesome "kosher" source to take seriously and even more so to discuss this kind of "information"? Migratory ducks are flying. I would not want TOPVAR to turn into a garbage dump of rotten game, reprinting liberoid stuffing.


        Would you write nonsense about liberoid stuffing before belay asked the original source! In general, it’s not only useful for reading (for general development) to read - information is from the environment.

        http://el-murid.livejournal.com/1312515.html
        1. mejik
          mejik 21 September 2013 20: 30
          +2
          Quote: DEMENTIY
          (for general development)

          I don’t have time to dig all the Internet guano in search of grain. I am quite developed for my age, so as not to be distracted by rubbish. Engage in common development yourself. And the stuffing, since they are not constructive, is quite liberoid for me, especially when they are visible to any sane person. And I wrote nonsense about them, not for you, but for adults with reason.
    2. Rus2012
      Rus2012 21 September 2013 17: 41
      +2
      Quote: GreatRussia
      Is this an awesome "kosher" source to take seriously and even more so to discuss this kind of "information"?


      ... this is a trial balloon - IMHO. Like, "how to roll" ...
    3. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 22 September 2013 03: 16
      +2
      Quote: GreatRussia
      ... the blogger and author of the newspaper VZGLYAD Anatoly El-Murid published a blog post about ...

      Is this an awesome "kosher" source to take seriously and even more so to discuss this kind of "information"?


      vz.ru is not a very reliable source. I would say that this is a nonsense who publishes any materials that attract attention, regardless of reliability. Elmurid thief authoritative unconditionally, but who said that they could not give him a misinformation? So it seems to me that the news is rumors and conjectures that were competently filed with desa.
      1. eplewke
        eplewke 23 September 2013 13: 42
        0
        This is nonsense! Stob Machiavelli in the service of Putin was fired. The president will not allow such. Precisely nonsense. In the furnace of such bloggers ...
  2. My address
    My address 21 September 2013 07: 35
    11
    Or the LADIES have absolutely govovushkoy ... Or maybe the LADIES are doing this on the sly, but the information was given in the media to get a completely predictable reaction. And then, based on the reaction, knock on the head with the words: "Got it, ...... who are you? Got it, ...... who do you work for?" Very hottsa like that! How much can you tolerate a specialist in all areas - from awarding Judas Gorbachev to the introduction of badminton into the broad army masses ?!
    1. Rosomaha67
      Rosomaha67 21 September 2013 14: 10
      +3
      ..... It also seems to me that it's time for BB to shake up this government and put some in its place, otherwise his experiments, in my opinion, will not lead to anything good ......
      1. AleksUkr
        AleksUkr 21 September 2013 17: 38
        +5
        Quote: Rosomaha67
        it's time for BB to shake up this government and put some in their place,


        And you need to start with DAM. He already got everyone. And if the article turns out to be true, then clearly not without the complicity of Prime Minister M. I doubt something that he
  3. mak210
    mak210 21 September 2013 07: 43
    0
    “The global financial and economic crisis convincingly demonstrated the impossibility of entering the path of sustainable development with reliance on the ideas of liberal capitalism”


    Do you finally understand? I doubt something very much. They managed to ruin industry and agriculture, transfer part of the control over resources to foreigners, and even increase the bureaucracy tenfold, and the further, the more. The market is driving. Why are you here?

    And the conflict between Pu and DAM is contrived, something like an evil and kind investigator.
    1. AleksUkr
      AleksUkr 21 September 2013 17: 40
      +4
      Quote: mak210
      And the conflict between Pu and DAM is contrived, something like an evil and kind investigator.


      And what do you prove? Or do you work in their environment? Or maybe it is?
  4. Valery Neonov
    21 September 2013 07: 45
    18
    Quote: My address
    Or maybe DAM achieves this quietly, but the information was given out in the media to get a completely predictable reaction.

    Or maybe not in a quiet one. Smoke without fire ... well, then everyone knows! The fear of Lavrov will explain, it brings benefits to RUSSIA. hi It's time ... a. Probably Yes, umm.
    1. pensioner
      pensioner 21 September 2013 09: 34
      +3
      +++++++++++++++ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! good hi Looks good!
      1. Dimy4
        Dimy4 21 September 2013 22: 13
        +1
        And it will bring benefits, golichki learn to sew!
    2. Current 72
      Current 72 21 September 2013 18: 35
      +1
      I agree, but I’m not sure that my consent will be taken into account by someone.
  5. major071
    major071 21 September 2013 07: 49
    +7
    Good morning everybody! There is no smoke without fire. Two options: either a provocation, or knows where the wind is blowing from. hi
  6. FC SKIF
    FC SKIF 21 September 2013 07: 50
    15
    About "no" Lavrov's head hysterical klintoshna broke, soon the carry with mental disorder will be taken away. How can you shoot such a PERSON. especially now.
  7. makst83
    makst83 21 September 2013 08: 02
    +9
    For all the time, after Putin came to power, only two ministers - S. Lavrov and S. Shoigu (Ministry of Emergency Situations) did not cause any complaints! And the situation with the "possible" resignation hmm .... for me this is a deliberate dumping of information, if the "informants" have not been smart enough to show their awareness)))
  8. Anatole Klim
    Anatole Klim 21 September 2013 08: 02
    +4
    Foreign policy is the prerogative of the president. Let the prime minister deal better with the economy, although there are no breakthroughs, on the contrary, the budget has already been cut.
  9. Silkway0026
    Silkway0026 21 September 2013 08: 03
    +9
    Dimasik's entourage (traitors to the Motherland) skillfully use his wounded pride.
    1. My address
      My address 21 September 2013 08: 26
      +5
      Sergei!

      It is quite possible complex now. Just look at his posture, well, just show off! Znachitsa and with the head of that and the fortuneteller / psychiatrist do not have to go.

      Here I have a friend - a little, but without a fool, a real man!
      1. AleksUkr
        AleksUkr 21 September 2013 17: 43
        +1
        Quote: My address
        Znachittsa and with the goloshka that and the fortuneteller / psychiatrist do not need to go.


        Tell me who your friend is! A friendly handshake ....
      2. AleksUkr
        AleksUkr 21 September 2013 17: 46
        +6
        Quote: My address
        Znachittsa and with a goloshka that


        A friendly handshake of understanding people .... They stand each other.
        1. Current 72
          Current 72 21 September 2013 18: 40
          0
          As the people say: TWO BOOTS, PAIR !!! They would be in the box, but to transport around Russia !!!
          1. alone
            alone 21 September 2013 22: 49
            0
            and a vat with evil spirits. and both inside. every 5 minutes swing a saber over their heads))))))
  10. Arkan
    Arkan 21 September 2013 08: 11
    10
    The fifth column stirred.
  11. SPACE
    SPACE 21 September 2013 08: 46
    +4
    Considering the threats made by American congressmen the day before against foreign assets of Russian banks, the main share of which is directly related to liberal, financial and oligarchic structures, then perhaps this is simply blackmail by the United States liberal structures in Russia, with the aim of influencing the latter on the political leadership country. Contradictions within the country continue to aggravate, which can lead either to concessions from the government, or to even greater strengthening of the Kremlin and the flight of whites over the hill. At the same time, the Syrian crisis is a measure, as it were, showing where the scales are leaning in Russia. In general, the West includes all the available "peaceful" levers in order to get Syria.
  12. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 21 September 2013 08: 57
    +6
    Anatole Klim Foreign policy is the prerogative of the president. Let the prime minister deal better with the economy, although there are no breakthroughs, on the contrary, the budget has already been cut
    .
    I hope Putin will deal with the "liberoids" himself and will not give offense to a strong Foreign Minister and will not give Medvedev subordinate to him through an alleged "promotion."
  13. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 21 September 2013 09: 01
    +7
    There is no smoke without fire .. Lavrov is a talented diplomat and they will try (fifth column) to compromise and squeeze him out of the political arena in every possible way.
  14. major071
    major071 21 September 2013 09: 12
    +9
    Recently, the premiere has begun to show less and less on TV. He lost his popularity (was it there?). He doesn’t solve anything, but he’s ready to eat oh how he wants to finally.
    1. AleksUkr
      AleksUkr 21 September 2013 17: 50
      +2
      Quote: major071
      Recently, less and less began to show the premiere on TV.

      He is very busy ... He has no time to shine ....
  15. Garrin
    Garrin 21 September 2013 09: 15
    +2
    According to the analyst, the attack on the minister comes from the government apparatus - he is accused of being overly tough during the Syrian crisis and complicating relations with the United States.

    Yes, it’s Dimona who’s completely his government and apparatus, in addition, to resign.
  16. pensioner
    pensioner 21 September 2013 09: 30
    +6
    Liberals believe that Russia should have less state
    Just the opposite. The state should have as few liberals as possible. Ideally, only one should stay. What would the rest of the world show him: they say here he is our liberal! Not everyone was taken out! Well, the rest of the creature in 1 instance can also be left. for the same purpose ...
  17. ivshubarin
    ivshubarin 21 September 2013 09: 38
    +4
    If Lavrov is fired, it will be clear who our government is working for
    1. Garrin
      Garrin 21 September 2013 09: 41
      +4
      Quote: ivshubarin
      If Lavrov is fired, it will be clear who our government is working for

      And without Lavrov’s resignation, it’s clear who it works for. With one hundred percent certainty, I can say that it is not the people of Russia.
    2. AleksUkr
      AleksUkr 21 September 2013 17: 57
      +3
      Quote: ivshubarin
      it will be clear who our government is working for

      Are you not quite sure yet? Let's go back a bit:
      May 7, 2013 From Putin’s report, one thing is clear: the government works west and for itself! Putin made it clear that the people of Russia are a burdensome ballast to modernize in vain innovations and integration with the west, the people hinder and thereby slow down the pace of the merger of the Russian aligarchic elite with world leaders capital!
    3. AleksUkr
      AleksUkr 21 September 2013 17: 59
      +1
      Quote: ivshubarin
      it will be clear who our government is working for

      Are you not quite sure yet? Let's go back a bit:
      May 7, 2013 From Putin’s report, one thing is clear: the government works west and for itself! Putin made it clear that the people of Russia are a burdensome ballast to modernize in vain innovations and integration with the west, the people hinder and thereby slow down the pace of the merger of the Russian aligarchic elite with world leaders capital!
      1. alone
        alone 21 September 2013 22: 51
        0
        GDP and DAM are one component. Is it really so difficult to understand? Do you still have hopes that GDP will send them out of office? Appointment Golikova is a vivid example of everything that happens there.
        1. AleksUkr
          AleksUkr 22 September 2013 17: 26
          0
          Golikova is very competent and she was practically supported by all factions in the Duma. The memory is not unrivaled. Arbidol is not to be considered. It is released by a friend of her family.
  18. shurup
    shurup 21 September 2013 09: 46
    +5
    Those who interfere liberally with their pockets can be blamed for their inhumane behavior. And those who help can be included in the ranks of the fighters for democracy.
  19. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 21 September 2013 09: 49
    +3
    from the Don.
    It’s clear that now the Foreign Ministry has a strong team! And Lavrov, an experienced, charismatic diplomat leader in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Moreover, in the main direction. I don’t think that the GDP will merge him. His words are: I don’t let my own in! holds the word or not.
  20. Ruslan_F38
    Ruslan_F38 21 September 2013 11: 14
    0
    On Wednesday evening, an orientalist, blogger and author of the newspaper VZGLYAD, Anatoly El-Murid, posted on his blog a message that the Kremlin was preparing a decree on relieving Sergei Lavrov of his duties as foreign minister.
    - .
  21. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 21 September 2013 11: 15
    +5
    <<< It is clear that in the Russian top, more precisely, in the liberal wing of the government, there are many supporters of improving relations with the United States by pursuing a cautious policy, not to contradict globalizers - in the hope that this will lead to a flow of investment and innovation . >>>
    Undoubtedly, the globalizers are furious with the position of Russia (primarily Putin - Lavrov) on Syria, which has put them in a big puddle in front of the whole world, and they are frantically looking for ways to influence Russia, undoubtedly relying on the 5th column they created and, above all, on entrenched in the power of pro-Western liberals, led by the famous liberalife, who approved at one time the plans of the West's "crusade" against Libya, which he still probably considers humanitarian aid to the spontaneously crappy revolution that arose there. This liberal shobla muddies the waters in order to once again rule in Russia, with the support of Western "partners"!
  22. Gur
    Gur 21 September 2013 12: 16
    +1
    His words-: I’m not giving my own



    The right words, but about Lavrov, this is one of the most frequently mentioned names of the last time, maybe just someone is promoting it
  23. dropout
    dropout 21 September 2013 12: 17
    +1
    Wrestling "Nanai boys" has always been a favorite sport in all power structures.
    But in this case, it seems that someone wants the winner to be Older brother these same "boys".
    Therefore, it is better to retake .....
  24. 31231
    31231 21 September 2013 12: 50
    +7
    It is hard to understand why people sincerely believe Murida. But he is not simple.
    And God forbid, whom whom, but our autocrat will not merge Lavrov and Shoigu. But Dimona seems to be lowered slowly. Here and the non-participation of Putin in the rams of the "legarchs" against father Lukashenko. And Dima and his Dvorkovichs are nothing against but father.
  25. amp
    amp 21 September 2013 13: 24
    +6
    If anyone is dismissed, then Medvedev, along with all his butlers and lawyers.
    1. Current 72
      Current 72 21 September 2013 18: 47
      0
      God grant, your words and God’s ears. Maybe that’s what happens.
  26. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 21 September 2013 17: 39
    +4
    I think that rumors about Lavrov's resignation are being spread by the home-grown "friends" of the Americans who have settled in the power, liberal offices of our country. They would give a lot to improve relations with the United States. And the Americans have only one desire: to sow uncertainty and uncertainty among their opponents in Russia. Hence such provocative forays against a great professional in international politics, of whom Lavrov is. We had Foreign Minister Kozyrev, who surrendered Russia to the Americans in the international arena. It was a shameful period in the international politics of our country. I am sure that Putin will not allow trump cards.
  27. Zomanus
    Zomanus 21 September 2013 17: 45
    +1
    And what for to grind this canoe? In this case, nothing depends on us here. And a priori, I personally do not expect anything good from our government.
  28. NOBODY EXCEPT US
    NOBODY EXCEPT US 21 September 2013 22: 04
    -1
    Is Yakunin a close friend of Putin? There is no person who destroys Russian Railways in terms of German-made spacecraft plying on our roads. Everything is normal, but in terms of electric trains for ordinary people, let's say Vladimir-Moscow there are TWO pieces per day, the rest of the super trains for people working in the capital are fucking too expensive For me, Putin was nothing after the "Kursk" and now I know who his friends are, Yakunin, Rotenberg, and the rest - the Val, fattened up on the country's natural resources and became a monopolist in one or another industry ...
  29. dmb
    dmb 21 September 2013 22: 18
    +2
    A rumor is also possible, but unfortunately rumors sometimes come true. Well, firstly, El-Murid, unlike various clowns like Pukhov, Karaganov and the like, is a serious analyst and does not really need cheap PR. Secondly, all of a sudden, Ivanov, who hitherto kept quiet and spoke only about GLONASS, suddenly began to make foreign policy statements. Even such a trifle as a laudatory ode to Putin, recently sung on the site by the "female hawk", also indirectly confirms this gossip. Apparently the term of "links" is coming to an end, and the Hawk is twisting his legs to take his place in the cage again. It's a pity, because Lavrov is perhaps the only worthy professional minister since the time of Gromyko, and certainly the only one in this government.
  30. Bibliographer
    Bibliographer 22 September 2013 02: 16
    0
    But isn’t it time for a lover of iPhones to ask for an exit! Obviously, such stuffing info comes from his environment!
    1. Hitrovan07
      Hitrovan07 22 September 2013 16: 43
      0
      You are wrong about going out. Let the MDA, with its highly professional economically savvy team, try to raise the Dalten East (although I would have set the budget eiu equal to 0, but I asked him to attend to the search for financing on the terms that Cyprus offered Russian depositors in its banks laughing ) But to ask for the results of the work is of course stricter (for example, as they did with Yukos). smile
  31. JIaIIoTb
    JIaIIoTb 22 September 2013 10: 09
    +1
    Lavrov, this is Machiavelli of our time. There are 1 such people on the whole planet. It is necessary to protect it. He guarantees that the Americans will hit their heads on their heads more than once.
    Apparently, the administration of the American president is well aware of this, especially the fact that he is not able to resist him, on equal terms. So they found leverage on the liberoid figures in the government. Although there is no need to look for these levers, they simply promised to take away the unjustly acquired, good for the amers, they keep all this from them.
    Sincerely.
  32. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 22 September 2013 13: 47
    +1
    sources of El-Murida not from those who sow panic from scratch. Moreover, the request to voice this information came from people genuinely concerned about the situation of Lavrov, and not from his opponents at all (the names of people related to the preparation of the decree are also known to El-Murid). If so, this means that some serious game (including hardware) against the head of the Foreign Ministry is underway, now it has reached a potentially dangerous stage for him.

    Of course, not from scratch, greens with portraits of thieves and scammers there are probably a lot poured.
    Everyone knows who the newspaper "Vzglyad", El-Murid and his sources are serving and before whom.
    It is a pity that we do not have Stalin, there is no one to cleanse Moscow of traitors.
  33. timer
    timer 22 September 2013 23: 09
    0
    Is it like the overseas friends of our liberals who, like lice, have entrenched in Russia, like an independent position that is held on topical world problems by Lavrov-read Putin? Of course not. And what they are doing is getting it right. Although I have a negative attitude towards Putin, I believe that he should react harshly.
  34. riding
    riding 23 September 2013 06: 35
    0
    When Lavrov is removed, it will be clear where Russia is being ruled from.
  35. slacker
    slacker 23 September 2013 16: 42
    +1
    His enemies are buried early. Break off ...