Alexey Komov, representative of the World Congress of Families in Russia and the CIS, Ambassador of the World Congress of Families at the UN
- Alexey, the topic of our conversation is the American elites and the worldwide promotion of various kinds of perversions lately. Tell us a little about yourself and why you are competent in these matters.
- I have been doing international topics for many years. My father worked for a long time in London as a diplomat, for four years we lived in Cuba. In 1990, I studied at the University of New York, worked for many years in international companies. In recent years, I have been actively engaged in establishing contacts with healthy forces in the West, with their leaders. First of all, this is quite a powerful worldwide movement for family values, the “prolife” movement, which stands for the right to life of unborn children. We have good acquaintances among congressmen, senators, deputies of the European Parliament, as well as among experts, scholars ... I am a representative of the World Congress of Families in Russia and the CIS. This is the largest group of supporters of family values from 80 countries of the world, including hundreds of organizations and millions of people on all continents.
I am also the ambassador of the World Congress of Families to the United Nations. At the level of the United Nations and other international institutions, we are trying to protect traditional family, Christian values from attacks by liberal secular ideas that are now actively being imposed in all societies. I am the president of the “Family Policy. RF” analytical center, where we analyze the legislation of the Russian Federation, international legal norms and, in general, the entire aspect of issues related to sociology, demography and family policy, we give our recommendations. In 2011, we held an international demographic summit, “The Family and the Future of Humanity” in Moscow. In Ulyanovsk, they made an international conference on demography. I also lead projects in the St. Basil the Great Charity Fund and am a member of the board of the Safe Internet League, fighting for the purity of Internet space from pedophilia, drugs and other negative things. Before I started doing international projects, I was engaged in management and real estate consulting. A year ago, I worked in the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate and was responsible for relations with civil society institutions abroad, spoke at various international conferences. Now I am the executive secretary of the Patriarchal Commission on Family and Maternity Protection. Father Dimitri Smirnov and I at the commission that gathered in full composition - and this is 12 people, recently discussed the whole range of relevant issues, including international ones.
- The list is impressive! Could you characterize the current situation in the world? Why is this happening right now? It seems that all the dirt that has accumulated for hundreds of years has spilled through some kind of broken barrier.
- We have recently seen an increase in attempts to impose on the society radical, revolutionary theories, in particular gender. What, they say, the sex of a person is not a given from God, but a social construct. That a boy can be raised both as a boy and as a girl, and it’s not necessary, they say, to impose gender roles on him - he will grow up and decide himself. In some versions, there are five or even seven floors, and they can be changed freely. That is, the attack is now going on the human being itself, on the very foundations of man. Scientifically, this is all not justified in any way, and the evidence that is presented is merely an ideological juggling of facts. But this does not confuse anyone, and we see that the international elites through the UN, UNICEF and other structures are actively promoting this ideology.
What is the reason? It seems to me that earlier many forces had been distracted by the confrontation in the “cold war” between the capitalist and socialist countries. 20 years ago, the world ideologically united, and world elites gained freedom of action to spread their “agenda” to the whole world. We see their activation, the imposition of revolutionary ideas that, if one digs, have neo-Marxist roots. This was largely due to the activities of the so-called Frankfurt Neo-Marxist School, which operated in the 1920 – 1940-s. The theorists of this school (Marcuse, Adorno, Horkheimer, Fromm, etc.) combined the ideas of Marx and Freudianism and gave rise to the concept of the 1960 sexual revolution, drug, psychedelic and all other “revolutions” and “emancipations”.
From there, the ideologies of the radical “green” movement, anti-globalists, and animal rights movements originate (to the detriment of human rights). From there, the powerful global movement to reduce population (neo-Malthusianism) is ideologically fueled, for the widespread abortion and, lately, for the gender homosexual revolution, which further develops radical ideas of feminism and so on. Their roots go back to neo-Marxism, that is, the desire to transform society in a revolutionary way.
György (Georg) Lukács
Considering the background of the issue, we will see that when the world revolution did not take place, which the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin and Trotsky, dreamed of, the Marxists began to analyze what “failure” occurred, and came to the conclusion that the brains of the proletariat are so “washed” by , first of all Christian, ideology, that it, Christianity, needs to be destroyed. At the new historical stage, they set the task of "washing out" Christian, family values from the brains of Europeans. For example, there was such a Hungarian Marxist Georg Lukács, who, during the existence of the Hungarian Soviet Republic, Béla Kuna, was the first to introduce a sex question in schools - in order to decompose the "bourgeois" foundations of society. He realized that the easiest way to do this with young people is through sex questioning. Lukács was the Minister of Education in this republic, which existed very briefly in 1919 – 1920.
Therefore, the “sex inquiry” that is now being imposed on the UN, by the International Family Planning Association, is pure Marxism for disintegrating society and promoting the world revolution. For a number of reasons, many foreign Marxists were forced to leave the Soviet Union. They settled in Frankfurt am Main in the 1920s; they were financed by rich people, as has happened more than once with revolutionaries. And in the course of their reasoning, they came to the conclusion that at the new historical stage, the telegraph stations should not be seized, like the Bolsheviks in Russia, but, according to the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci, they should take a “long march through the institutions” as cinema, television, media, universities, and through them to broadcast their ideas, revolutionizing society. And after such preparation, brainwashing, the political power itself will fall at the feet of the Marxists, thereby bringing the victory of the world revolution closer. Many figures developed this theory further, actively using Freud's ideas. They came to the conclusion that, as the proletariat was previously suppressed by the bourgeoisie, the subconscious mind is also suppressed by bourgeois morality, Christian norms, prohibitions, primarily in the area of marriage, sexual relations, and you need to throw it all off because all his secret desires, fantasies and instincts will not receive their full realization. But this is prevented by Christianity in the first place, with which it is necessary to fight as the number one enemy, which they set as their goal. And the fact that in our, Eastern Christian tradition, in monasticism is considered a sin (and the struggle with which “Invisible scolding”, “Ladder”, etc.) are devoted to, new social revolutionaries ascends as criteria of progress and happiness. All these passions should receive complete emancipation, and then, as they believe, the “golden age” will come - humanity will come close to happiness.
For this, you need to use drugs, alcohol, listen to the appropriate music, which should help liberate the inner instincts called sins in Christianity, and then the world revolution will come, world happiness, humanity will return to its "golden age". At the same time, this theory, which is now almost a “mainstream” in Western sociology, does not have any scientific basis. This is, in fact, a purely religious theory, although it is supported by some respected people, philosophers, and so on. The “golden age” of humanity is considered to be some initial “primitive state”, when man was not separated from nature, but was part of it. As soon as a person became isolated, he separated himself from nature as a person, problems began: private property appeared, the division into “mine” - “not mine” and all other misfortunes, and it is necessary, they say, to return to this primitive state through total emancipation and destruction of individuality (I. Shafarevich wrote about this well in his time in the book “Socialism as a World Phenomenon stories"). George Soros, for example, supports the worldwide movement for the legalization of drugs and prostitution and considers himself an adherent of this new ideology.
Also, these revolutionaries believe that a woman is supposedly suppressed by a man; she needs to be set free. Hence, the movement of feminists, which began with suffragists, the movement for equal rights, and ended with what we are seeing now - with various inadequate things.
Children, they say, also need to be given rights, as they are supposedly suppressed by their parents. We see that various “hotlines” are advertised, on which children, using the juvenile system, can complain to their parents for the slightest reason. This is also a part of revolutionary ideology in the overthrow of the established order of things by God.
The carrier of revolutionary ideology in the new conditions is not the proletariat, but various minorities: national, students, migrant workers and - first of all - sexual minorities. That is, instead of the worker from the Putilov factory, the homosexual activist is now the main revolutionary. We see that they play a central role in the overthrow of the existing social order and are "at the forefront of the attack." After all, if you look at the modern world, we note that the topic of same-sex marriage has become the "bare nerve" of world politics. So, when a law was passed in Russia banning the promotion of homosexuality to children, a huge international campaign was launched, calling even for a boycott of the Olympic Games. That is, this question is more important than oil, gas ... The world elites are alarmed and “press” Russia.
It is precisely on this basis that society in the West is being divided now. We remember the recent multimillion demonstrations in France against the legalization of so-called “same-sex marriages”; also in America: half of America is for, half is against. Now it is here that the main line of attack on traditional values passes.
- It turns out that Hollywood, some departments in the universities of the USA and Europe are occupied by neo-Marxists?
- Yes, it is.
- But what about the fact that in Hollywood the image of the Communists has always been extremely unsightly? And how to treat our communists, besides Zyuganov, for example, who have quite sensible views on the family, while those and others must honor their common “ideological ancestor”?
- We have a confusion in the socio-political spectrum: it is not clear who is actually left and who is right. It is not clear by what criteria to refer a person to one or another force. It must be borne in mind here that the USSR did not survive all the Western sexual and drug revolutions of 1960 – 1970-ies, since it was behind the “iron curtain”. We have this destructive wave and the course towards the world revolution (the family is a bourgeois relic and must die off; free love preached by A. Kollontai; legalization of abortions and sodomy is one of the first decrees of Soviet power, etc.), first introduced by Trotsky, under Stalin faded away - pragmatism won. Many sensible things were restored and after a period of stagnation existed in a mothballed form until the collapse of the USSR. Zyuganov and our other “Lefts” appeal to the basic postulates and their implementation, which were established and existed in the Soviet Union, and thus, in fact, uphold conservative values, that is, they are “right” by many views, although, by definition, 70- years ago, the communists are always left-wing, this is the paradox of the modern Russian socio-political spectrum.
It is also a paradox that, according to the late Soviet tradition, everything that comes to us from the West is, by definition, “right” (since Soviet communists, by definition, are “left”). Therefore, for example, the party, for some reason called “Right Cause” here, essentially promotes purely leftist views: extended interpreted rights of homosexuals, revolutionary gender ideology, juvenile technologies, unjustified state intervention in family rights, etc. And all this confusion and confusion occurs because, as before, we still mistakenly consider the West as a kind of monolithic and hostile to Russia force, and this is far from being the case, and the West itself is very deeply divided now. There are liberals and conservatives in it, and the confrontation between them often takes on a very fierce character.
An additional complication is the fact that the division into liberals and conservatives can occur in the sphere of only political-economic or only social issues. So an American who adheres to conservative views on social issues will stand for strengthening family and Christian values, against gay parades and legalizing so-called “same-sex marriages”, against abortions, legalizing drugs, juvenile justice, etc .; but he may not adhere to conservative views on economic issues, but be a liberal in this regard. Similarly, a conservative in political and economic issues (that is, a supporter of restricting the federal government’s power to intervene in family and individual affairs, a supporter of reducing government spending on bureaucrats and bureaucracy, reducing the tax burden on businesses and individuals, etc.) may adhere to liberal views on social issues.
Leaders of the Right Opposition at the American Embassy
This division is quite clearly seen between Republicans (conservatives) and Democrats (liberals) in the United States. So the policy of the US Department of State under Obama promotes left-liberal views throughout the world (for example, imposing perversely understood rights of sexual minorities, abortions, etc.), which in our country are, among others, the Right Cause party. It would be good to correct this accumulated confusion and give new adequate names to the whole spectrum of social and political movements in modern Russia.
In general, it can be said that Western liberals are socialists and atheists, and conservatives are in favor of private initiative and Christian and family values. This last aspect can become the common platform that will unite all the conservatives of the planet. And here, Russia has a real historical chance to become the universally recognized leader of this nascent pro-family movement and reclaim its ideological and moral leadership in geopolitics.
Also before our eyes there was still a very interesting phenomenon: America and Russia over the past 30 years have changed places in their function in the world. If before the USSR supported the revolutionary and national liberation movement all over the world (and conservative America tried to restrain this process), today conservative Russia performs the function of “holding back” and trying to stabilize the situation in Syria, in the Middle East and in other regions, which exploded as a result America-supported “color revolutions” and “Arab spring” (which turned into “anti-Christian winter”). So much in the world has changed diametrically, and it would be very useful for Russia to grope its new mission in the world, to understand what our true national idea is, and to build in accordance with this the entire domestic and foreign policy. On bare pragmatism here you will not get far, and you need to fight at the level of ideas and meanings. If Russia takes a consistent stance on upholding healthy family values, the child’s right to have a mom and dad, then half the world can suddenly become our ideological allies. I pray that this realization will come to the leadership of our country.
- Let's go back to America. After winning the Cold War, it became clear that only one superpower remained in the world. One can understand on what grounds the US leadership supports all sorts of anti-family, antisocial programs in other countries, primarily in Russia, because politically this weakened our state. But now, when the American elites openly support anti-family policy in America itself, the question arises: why is this necessary? After all, for any sane person it is obvious that the support of such a policy is the suicide of the state. Or do they want to create a separate state?
- Modern elites often do not have nationality. Although most of their representatives are now settled in America, they are still transnational communities, which include people from different nations and different traditions. The most influential part of world elites considers it necessary to pursue a policy of further liberalization, which includes, in particular, the recognition of same-sex marriage. Approximately half of the population of the West resists this. We know about multi-million protests in France against the legalization of so-called “same-sex marriages”, communicated with their organizers. But despite this, laws like the French are passing through, being imposed on the peoples, because there is, one can say, a suicidal line on changing the nature of man. Elites set goals wider than state. They want to change the social structure of society, to reverse the concepts of good and evil, the very nature of man, and for them this occult-religious task is more important than a narrow national one. Many sound forces - in the same America - are aware of and struggling with this as much as they can. But we must take into account the fact that the forces are far from being equal.
The entire financial and economic structure revolves around the Federal Reserve System, which is a private corporation accountable to no one, granting the USA the right to use the money printed by it at interest. The elite who control the gold reserves, financial flows, the media and in general all of the country's policies do not pursue the interests of maintaining a healthy nation in the United States. These people have global goals for transforming the whole world, building a new society based on an ideology that includes a certain set of views. However, elites are heterogeneous; there is a part of elites that resists this, but it is much weaker. Conservative funds and projects account for less than 5% of 300 billion dollars spent by organizations and individuals in the United States annually for charity. The remaining 95% go to various projects of a liberal focus, actively promoted by such major philanthropists as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundations, the W. and F. Hewlett, the Rockefellers, George Soros, etc. Their tasks are to reduce population in the name of combating largely artificially bloated “global warming” and under the guise of family planning, the spread of contraception and abortion, the promotion of the misunderstood rights of the LGBT community and juvenile justice, legalization of drugs, prostitution and pedophilia. And all in the name of the misunderstood "happiness of liberated humanity," who threw off the "repressive fetters of religious obscurantism."
If we talk about the nature of the financial power of the elites, then it is curious to consider the history of the formation of the US Federal Reserve - a unique education of its kind. When the United States turned into a superpower between the two world wars, the Federal Reserve, created with the participation of the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers and others in 1913, set itself the task of becoming the owner of the bulk of gold in the world. China, the most densely populated and industrialized country in the Middle Ages, selling its silk, porcelain and other products only for gold, by the early twentieth century had amassed almost the bulk of gold in the world. The country was experiencing a period of instability, and at that time Japan was armed by world elites precisely in order to occupy China and take out Asian gold, which later settled in the Federal Reserve. In exchange for this, a lot of IOUs, which are now floating in Asia, were issued - for billions and trillions of dollars. Receipts were issued for a period of about 60 years, and in 1990-ies the time of payment came. According to some information, an unofficial court was held in The Hague at the end of 1990, where the Kuomintang of China, who fled to Taiwan, demanded that the US return the gold taken from it in exchange for bonds. The court satisfied their claim, but America refused to return the gold. The court decision on the last day of payment was to be 11 September 2001, and when the towers of the World Trade Center collapsed, a large gold reserve stored under one of them disappeared without a trace in the conflagration. And it turned out that America should nothing more to China. Like it or not - you need to check, but this version is, and it is confirmed by a number of facts.
Another question raises the question: the current economic boom of China and the surrender of the American market to cheap Chinese goods cannot be attributed to purely economic reasons. There was clearly some kind of agreement between the elites of China and the United States. Deng Xiaoping came to America in the 1979 year, at a time when the Americans headed for the destruction of the united front of the socialist countries. The main enemy was the Soviet Union, while China decided to integrate it into international processes. An agreement was reached, and the modern “most favored nation” regime for China, its economic boom is largely due to the fact that this is the price paid by the American elites and their intelligence services to the Chinese for a huge amount of gold exported at the time. There is a version that a large amount of gold exported from China was unrecorded, it was used by the CIA and other special services, which during the Cold War needed financial space to carry out various secret operations and special projects. This, in fact, created a parallel shadow financial system, operating with sums many times greater than the turnover of the real economy. This shadow system is fully controlled by world elites. They have a printing machine at their disposal: they have the ability to print banknotes in an almost unlimited number; they have the opportunity to exchange speculations on virtual derivatives, to receive huge interest from the world gold reserves stored in the Fed and its international sister BIS (Bank of International Settlements), actually withdrawn from active official turnover. And for a long time the main world media came under the control of the same privileged group of people. And if we add here the fact that the ultimate owners of practically all the largest corporations in the world are persons of a limited circle related to those who are related to the Federal Reserve System, then the degree of power of the world elite becomes obvious.
Also, the gold reserves of dozens of other countries voluntarily or not quite gradually moved into the Federal Reserve. As for one of the largest gold reserves of the Russian Empire in the world, almost all of it was exported from Russia either by the Bolsheviks or by the White Guards during the civil war and through the banks of England, France, Germany and Japan, and apparently also ended up in gold deposits Fed.
When all the gold of the world was collected by the world elite, the so-called Bretton Woods system was created in 1944, and in 1970 the refusal of the gold standard occurred, and now the dollar is not secured except by the enormous military and political power of the USA (known that the US military budget exceeds the military budgets of all other countries of the world, taken together). Those who take the path of abandoning the dollar risk being severely punished. So, Charles de Gaulle, who was against the domination of the dollar and announced his intention to exchange all cash dollars for gold, was forced to resign because of student unrest. The fact is that the world elite has long been seriously in control of the situation and has its own ideology, which it promotes. This is the power of money (the notorious "golden calf"), based on the percentage prohibited in the Bible and usury, the liberal tolerant ideology of political correctness and juvenile technology, the destruction of the family and God-created human essence.
Sacrifice in a Bohemian Grove in California
Religious and occult tasks are set. We know about the existence of various secret societies throughout almost the entire history of mankind, which professed the Gnostic, occult ideologies, which were either a parody of the Church or an anti-Church. They are perfectly preserved and have survived to our days.
But I would like to say this as well. It may appear that these evil forces dominate the world so much that the “focus” of a person shifts. This is a wrong impression, unhealthy, you have to refrain from this, since the Lord God controls everything that happens on the Earth and even carries out the things necessary to Him by the hands of the villains. We know how it will end, the Bible says so. Excessive concentration on evil is harmful to man, since he distracts him from the struggle with the sin that is inside each of us. But closing your eyes, not understanding who controls many processes in the world, is also self-deception. It is necessary to separate, of course, proven facts from fantasies and notions, but, nevertheless, all these secret societies do have a great influence.
“Though you don’t need to give this excessive value, but you can’t underestimate the enemy and assume that he’s not there.” Which books, sites can be sent to an interested reader to show that this is all really serious?
- Indeed, no need to overestimate. To concentrate on evil is not a good thing. The world is ruled by a united, good and just God, but man, through his free will, is subject to sin, there is much lawlessness in the world, and it is even strengthened. And many things are clear without conspiracy theories.
For example, any normal person understands that a child must have a father and mother. However, now it is being questioned and completely abnormal phenomena, such as homosexuality, are extolled as the best, and their carriers are served as the “conscience of the nation”. In essence, 3 – 5, and perhaps less, percent of the country's population impose its line on the whole society - where is democracy and the rights of the majority here? Without the support of influential elites and their malicious intent, this cannot be done. We see that this issue has become a worldwide agenda and international organizations, in particular the UN, impose it on all countries.
Further, the right to abortion. It turns out that a child is not a minute before birth, and if he is still alive as a result of an abortion, he can be finished off, thrown into the dustbin ...
Or let's see what toys are offered to children in any modern store: the percent of the 70 range is made up of horrible monsters for boys or dolls similar to prostitutes for girls. As if some invisible hand prepares our children for life in hell and introduces them to its inhabitants in advance. Well, the content of most movies and TV programs is well known to everyone, and it is also well known that authoritative international commissions and film festivals award top prizes for the most perverted films.
And the incessant attacks on the Christian Church under any pretext? This, too, is. A certain line is being drawn, and one does not need to rush into conspiracy in order to see that some evil intent exists - it is enough to keep an eye on events and facts: that there is a certain agenda, that there are people controlling these processes, and they promote this particular line. There is no need to delve into many documents, although they abound to make sure that there is a global policy pursued by certain circles, quite influential, and it is destructive in nature and has a clear anti-Christian focus, for "the world lies in evil." However, we also know that we need to preserve vigor and courage, for victory will be ours and Christ "will conquer the world."