Military Review

Ships operational connection of the Navy in the Mediterranean Sea

76
In connection with the tense situation in Syria, many are wondering, what do we have there? Many confuse the situation and newswhich sometimes contradict one another. It comes to the fact that in a fresh story from the Star, the operational connection is shown as of June, as relevant. Let's see what of the surface ships are now there and what will happen in the very near future.


Ships operational connection of the Navy in the Mediterranean Sea

The flagship of the operational compound BPC "Admiral Panteleev", which houses the headquarters. After the transition from the Pacific fleet he stood for a long time in Novorossiysk, but as the situation began to heat up, he left for the eastern Mediterranean. The Dardanelles Strait was completed on August 31.


The commander of the operational connection Yuri Zemsky.


Patrol ship Fearless. Returned after the watch in the Gulf of Aden. In view of the complexity of the situation, the Fearless will stay in the Eastern Mediterranean for some time. The passage of the Suez Canal 18 August.


BDK Admiral Nevelsky passed the 19 Straits August is located in the eastern Mediterranean.


BDK Peresvet passed straits 19 August is located in the eastern Mediterranean.


BDK Alexander Shabalin passed strait 21 August is located in the eastern Mediterranean.


BDK Azov is the main purpose of OSU Zapad-2013, however some delay is possible, the ship is still in the Mediterranean.


BDK Minsk left in early September, moving to the Eastern Mediterranean.


BDK Novocherkassk is gone 3 September moves to the Eastern Mediterranean.


TFR Sharp-witted September 3 came out to accompany the BDK Minsk and Novocherkassk, moving to the eastern Mediterranean.


BDK Nikolay Filchenkov, preparing for the BS in the eastern Mediterranean. 31 August left Sevastopol and went to NBMB under load.


SRZK Azov, located in the Eastern Mediterranean.


Tanker Yelnya serves in the eastern Mediterranean.


The tug MB-304 serves in the eastern Mediterranean.


Plavmaster PM-138 is located in Tartus as part of semi-annual duty.


BOD Admiral Kulakov completes the transition across the Atlantic, moving to the eastern Mediterranean, should change the TFR Fearless.


The Guards missile cruiser Moscow, moving to the eastern Mediterranean, completes the Atlantic transition.


Tanker Ivan Bubnov follows along with the cruiser Moscow to the eastern Mediterranean.


The tug Evgeny Khorov goes along with the cruiser Moscow to the eastern Mediterranean.


RKA Ivanovets, according to RIA Novosti, should launch a database in the Eastern Mediterranean on September 29.


IRA Shtil according to RIA Novosti should step on the database in the eastern Mediterranean 29 September.

Long term:


The cruiser Varyag, the tanker Boris Butoma and the tugboar SB-522 set off on a long cruise on August 28, they should visit Australia, and then turn around and go to the Mediterranean Sea.


Airborne cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov, BOD SF will go to the eastern Mediterranean for this winter, the cruise will begin on December 5.


Today (September 4) Interfax reported - "It is planned that the flagship of the Baltic Fleet destroyer Persistent" will join the grouping of our ships. It is unclear when and if, if it takes place, this will be the first long-distance cruise of the 956 project destroyer in recent years. Although, the Insistence status is not bad, he also went to the BP BP test site several times this year. Perhaps from the troika (Fast, Ushakov, Persistent) is not the most driven.

The underwater component is secret, but surely it is there and not represented by one boat.

Photos tried to give the most relevant, so most of the BDK in poor quality.
Author:
Photos used:
airbase, Igor Torgachkin and spotters
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. tronin.maxim
    tronin.maxim 5 September 2013 08: 17 New
    11
    A good group, are we going to drown all of NATO there? Hmm, that would be nice! What is especially surprising to me is that there is a lot of BDK. Toli there are many Marines armed to the fullest, there are many air defense systems. We are waiting for the future development of events!
    1. Arberes
      Arberes 5 September 2013 08: 55 New
      10
      According to news releases, it is known that in the Mediterranean at the moment there are 5 destroyers of the US Navy (Burke) and a French frigate will join them. Shtatovskie boats are also present there, I have no doubt. What should be the counterweight to this group of NATO ships?
      In my opinion, at least one ATLANT-class cruiser and a pair of Sarych destroyers at least have shock weapons! There is no such thing on the BDK AND BOD, well, with the exception of Admiral CHABANENKO, who underwent modernization! And just in case, at least one boat of the ANTEI class. That's when the pins will tense up and this grouping should have been near the Syrian shores yesterday and on an ongoing basis. This does not include US AUG! hi
      Quote: Canep
      It looks like all the ships that stayed afloat in Russia. It’s sad.

      Yes, you can’t count on a constant rotation! hi
      1. UzRus
        UzRus 5 September 2013 09: 33 New
        +2
        And the "Moscow" and "Varyag" - are they not cruisers of the Atlant project?
        1. Arberes
          Arberes 5 September 2013 10: 23 New
          +3
          Quote: UzRus
          And the "Moscow" and "Varyag" - are they not cruisers of the Atlant project?

          ATLANTS, ATLANTS and read the answer from the commentary baltika-18 (2)-he means the same thing!
          Quote: baltika-18
          See long trips for the last 3-4 of the year. The same ship names. Compulsorily, it seems that others simply will not reach.

          Hi friend drinks
      2. Tot-enot
        Tot-enot 15 September 2013 15: 59 New
        0
        Does one of them depress me? Ships are RUSTY! I understand that this does not affect the combat qualities, but even a little ashamed ........
    2. artemiy
      artemiy 5 September 2013 09: 01 New
      +6
      BDK is like trucks I think there are not only marines
    3. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 5 September 2013 17: 53 New
      0
      If the data presented in the article are true, then the United States should think hard before hitting Syria. Unless of course left to think. RTOs there for what? Yes, and it’s late on September 29 - the term of the attack was determined by the first half of September. Kuznetsov in general - December.
    4. biglow
      biglow 5 September 2013 18: 02 New
      +2
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      A good group, are we going to drown all of NATO there? Hmm, that would be nice! What is especially surprising to me is that there is a lot of BDK. Toli there are many Marines armed to the fullest, there are many air defense systems. We are waiting for the future development of events!

      this is probably not a secret, BDK carry supplies to Syria. In Sevastopol, all warehouses were relieved of junk over the past year, which is also good ...
  2. Canep
    Canep 5 September 2013 08: 32 New
    11
    It looks like all the ships that stayed afloat in Russia. It’s sad.
    1. baltika-18
      baltika-18 5 September 2013 09: 12 New
      +9
      Quote: Canep
      It looks like all the ships that stayed afloat in Russia. Sadly

      What are we minus Sergey? Not so wrong.
      See long trips for the last 3-4 of the year. The same ship names. Compulsorily, it seems that others simply will not reach.
      1. Karlsonn
        Karlsonn 5 September 2013 13: 53 New
        +6
        Quote: baltika-18
        See long trips for the last 3-4 of the year. The same ship names. Compulsorily, it seems that others simply will not reach.


        Not everything is so bad:

        ... On September 3, at 16.00, the strategic nuclear submarine missile carrier Yuri Dolgoruky, the lead ship of the 995 Borey project, left the Sevmash plant and departed to the place of permanent service in the Northern Fleet. A new base for the submarine is the village of Gadzhievo.
        Read more: http://vpk-news.ru/news/17320
    2. donavi49
      5 September 2013 09: 48 New
      +7
      Yah? Cruiser Peter the Great went to the Arctic (10 surface ships, 2 BDK, ACC vessels, KIL Pushkin, as it were, hinted that under water there, too, the active engine left). Corvettes in the Baltic run. The wise is preparing for a long trip. With the Pacific Fleet they are preparing BOD Vinogradov or Tributs for the next Aden shift. Severomorsk is also ready for the Northern Fleet, but Chabanenko will be in the 2014 year for repair in the 1,5 year.
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 6 September 2013 01: 01 New
        +4
        Quote: donavi49
        Corvettes in the Baltic run.

        I confirm.
        Yesterday all (or almost all) of Baltiysk went to sea. I will not list - the enemy is not asleep. laughing
      2. little man
        little man 6 September 2013 01: 27 New
        +1
        Yes, how much can you hint !!
        Need to build! Indeed, in fact - srach is between the plants who will cut loot and no more!
        And here we are ananizing to Moscow and to secret boats in the depths of the ocean.
    3. Karlsonn
      Karlsonn 5 September 2013 14: 07 New
      0
      Quote: Canep
      It looks like all the ships that stayed afloat in Russia. It’s sad.


      In your fantasies it may be so, in reality everything is different.

      ... The icebreaker "Admiral Makarov" on Wednesday night at 04:45 Vladivostok time / September 3, 21:45 Moscow time / rescued in the Arctic Ocean the crew of the French catamaran "Babushka", consisting of two people. The motor-sailing catamaran went from Alaska to Iceland through the North Pole and got stuck in the ice near the Russian Wrangel Island. On August 31, the French extreme ocean voyages signaled SOS.
      According to the press service of the Russian Ministry of Transport, the Admiral Makarov icebreaker of the Far Eastern Shipping Company was sent to help the French in distress. He was on watch on the Northern Sea Route, was in the area of ​​Cape Schmidt / Chukotka /. On September 2, "Admiral Makarov" headed for a catamaran, made its way to it through the solid ice tonight and lifted the French yachtsmen along with their small boat on board.
      “The French are all right, they are happy and smiling,” the Far Eastern Shipping Company told ITAR-TASS.
      Now "Admiral Makarov" is heading to the port of Pevek in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, and in optimal weather it plans to arrive in the harbor on September 6.


  3. Kubatai
    Kubatai 5 September 2013 08: 34 New
    +6
    Dams .. BDK is really a bit much and there’s no sense in chasing them - it means either the holds are not empty and waiting for a signal for unloading, or they will urgently take out something ...
  4. Cormorants
    Cormorants 5 September 2013 08: 48 New
    0
    Yes there is a lot of BDK, maybe our citizens will be taken out in the event of a conflict! All the same, there are many of our civilians!
  5. nurlangali
    nurlangali 5 September 2013 09: 04 New
    +2
    Rusty scarfs would be nice to tint am
  6. UzRus
    UzRus 5 September 2013 09: 23 New
    -1
    BDK almost all rusty! What a horror!
    1. donavi49
      5 September 2013 09: 42 New
      10
      Well, this is my friend’s sea, there is no time for painting. Here's an actual photo of the US DKVD like San Antonio, which is also near Syria.
      1. UzRus
        UzRus 5 September 2013 10: 29 New
        0
        It’s clear that the sea. But in my opinion, the DKVD still looks more respectable ... But why not send Peter the Great? It would be very impressive. Maybe...
        1. donavi49
          5 September 2013 10: 33 New
          +3
          He went to the Arctic. There, the exercises are more serious than OSU West-2013, simply secretive. Yes, and why? What will he specifically do in the Mediterranean?
          1. UzRus
            UzRus 5 September 2013 11: 16 New
            0
            Specifically, he could probably help his appearance to help reduce tension. IMHO.
      2. little man
        little man 5 September 2013 11: 53 New
        +5
        But what about the reconnaissance ship "Priazovye" forgot to mention? The ship is serious. An article was here 2 days ago.
        1. donavi49
          5 September 2013 12: 16 New
          +2
          SRZK Azov, located in the Eastern Mediterranean.


          And a photo of PM-138 and CER-201 in Tartus this summer laughing
  7. 0255
    0255 5 September 2013 09: 53 New
    +2
    Russian BDK looks more terrible, no offense will be told to him. How is he doing with the wear and tear of equipment - physical and mental? Look at the photographs of Soviet warships, at that time they were not so rusty. I hope they will frighten NATO admirals with their presence. And the Americans do not torpedo them on the sly, like the Kursk 12 years ago.
    1. donavi49
      5 September 2013 10: 05 New
      +7
      This is Kulakov, he is actually new wink , the case is there even before the new fashion for foil, so there’s still a lot of resource on it. Machines and mechanisms were put in a big repair there (according to the plans, they were supposed to return the fleet back in 93) - the ship is only in in the autumn 2010 years he returned to the fleet, replaced the machines, went through a bunch of mechanisms, put the dagger post aft (Udalom and Kulakova initially had no air defense systems, because he wasn’t ready), upgraded electronic warfare, radioelectronic guns and so on.

      Morally - well, the concept itself is outdated. However, in general, the SAM system is not bad - consider TOR-M. Plus radar Frigate-MA, shines well wink . According to the HAC, everything is also a bunch, modern and meets the tasks. There is no strike complex, although in Soviet times, 85RU showed just survivability miracles in combat firing (more than once there were funny things when it was shot down by the 3-4 once everyone went from MD to MD and it flew).
  8. creak
    creak 5 September 2013 10: 17 New
    +4
    During the Cold War, the 5th operational squadron of the USSR Navy in the Mediterranean consisted of 75-80 pennants, including 3-4 nuclear submarines, and had an aviation component. In particular, TU-6 naval aviation scouts based at the Cairo West airfield in Egypt went daily for additional reconnaissance of the US 16th Fleet. In addition to Tartus, ships could make calls to the ports of Egypt ...
    1. Aleksys2
      Aleksys2 5 September 2013 10: 40 New
      +7
      Quote: ranger
      During the Cold War, the 5-I operational squadron of the USSR Navy in the Mediterranean consisted of 75-80 pennants

      The squadron was formed on a rotational basis: it consisted of surface and submarine forces of the Northern, Baltic and Black Sea fleets, as well as ships of the Pacific Fleet, performing inter-theater transitions to the Pacific Fleet or vice versa. The basis of the surface component of OPEsk was the forces of the 30-th division of anti-submarine ships of the Black Sea Fleet. The combat service of the division’s ships in the Mediterranean was carried out brigadely: the 21 and 11 brigades served as the basis for the creation of anti-submarine forces, and the 150 and 70 brigades used to create a group of dissimilar strike forces and a group of fire support ships for naval landing landing.
      As a rule, the squadron consisted of 70-80 pennants (up to 30 surface warships, 4-5 nuclear and 10 diesel submarines, 1-2 naval tankers, 3-4 marine tankers, minesweepers, dry-cargo ships, ships , refrigerators, hospital and rescue ships, sea tugs, etc.). The US Navy in the Mediterranean, represented by the 6 fleet, usually consisted of 30-40 pennants, including 2 aircraft carrier, landing helicopter dock, 2 missile cruisers (1 as the flagship of the fleet), 18-20 cruise ships with guided missiles, destroyers and frigates), 1-2 multipurpose support ships, up to 6 multipurpose nuclear submarines.
      The combat service of the 5 operational squadron was complicated by the complete absence of the Soviet naval bases in the Mediterranean Sea necessary for protection from storms, replenishment of water supplies, rest of crews or inter-naval repairs, while the “probable enemy” - the USA - had such a base. The squadron could have only a limited number of basing points, which included Port Said (before the 1972 year) and Tartus (Syria). For this reason, the ships of the squadron defended on anchors and barrels installed on the shallows in certain places (the so-called "points") of the Mediterranean Sea.
    2. Poppy
      Poppy 6 September 2013 11: 28 New
      +1
      where so much? I served there, I do not remember dozens of ships, from the strength of 15-20
  9. patrianostra
    patrianostra 5 September 2013 11: 14 New
    +3
    At present, 3 S-300 divisions are deployed in Tartus, with armor covering the near zone. Base cover from the sea and pdo on a mixed group of Pacific Fleet, Black Sea Fleet, BF. The ground group is the reinforced regimental group of marines with heavy weapons. The base itself is completely transferred to Russia. The BDK really play the role of transporters for the delivery of material values ​​and equipment, this is due to the fact that civilian vessels can be stopped by NATO ships. Thoughts in the ears in the Mediterranean Sea would not be completely hindered by civilian container ship vessels with autonomous container complexes BAL. This is our asymmetric response type, plus a dg strike at aviation bases in Cyprus Malta in Turkey. AUG without the support of ground-based aviation was simply a scarecrow.
    1. Aleksys2
      Aleksys2 5 September 2013 11: 44 New
      +1
      Quote: patrianostra
      3 of the C-300 division with cover of the near zone with shells.

      I understand that they are staffed by our "civilian" specialists.
    2. Evgeniy-111
      Evgeniy-111 5 September 2013 12: 45 New
      0
      You can and RK Club
    3. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 5 September 2013 17: 56 New
      0
      Quote: patrianostra
      At present, 3 S-300 divisions are deployed in Tartus, with armor covering the near zone.

      Where does this infa come from?
    4. IRBIS
      IRBIS 5 September 2013 18: 42 New
      +4
      Quote: patrianostra
      At the moment, Tartus has deployed 3 of the C-300 division with cover of the near zone with shells. Base cover from the sea and pdo on a mixed group of Pacific Fleet, Black Sea Fleet, BF. The ground group is the reinforced regimental group of marines with heavy weapons.

      Where did the firewood come from? The marines are all in the RPM, are engaged in planned combat training, and you have already planted a reinforced regimental group with heavy weapons in Tartus. What fleet is this group from?
      Covering the base from the sea and the PDO by the existing "mixed" group? What are you talking about? Have you heard anything about the PDR? About her organization?
      And the group of ships there is more likely ridiculous than mixed. 90% - transport, tanker, reconnaissance. All this is about twenty minutes of work for the KUG of Americans, taking into account the preparation of data for firing and the flight time of missiles.
      1. VDV 80-82
        VDV 80-82 5 September 2013 20: 54 New
        +1
        military! judging by the epaulettes, you are an army general, but by posts do not rustle at all in military affairs! Do you seriously think that for 20 minutes the amers will iron our group ... will everyone else look at it with popcorn ??? 5 minutes after the attack, the amers will begin to have much more serious problems in their homeland and wherever our poplars will fly!
        1. IRBIS
          IRBIS 6 September 2013 09: 09 New
          0
          Quote: VDV 80-82
          military! judging by the epaulettes, you are an army general, but by posts do not rustle at all in military affairs!

          I do not "rustle", as you have deigned to say, but I understand professionally.
          1. With such a composition of our group, we can only observe the flights of Tomahawks and American carrier-based aircraft with popcorn.
          2. Leave the patriotic exclamations about the Topol flight for table conversations. Together with talk about the problems of the Americans at home.
          3. Armed conflict and nuclear war are two big differences. Personally, do you have a desire to get "Trident" in your city for Syria?
          1. stalkerwalker
            stalkerwalker 6 September 2013 12: 37 New
            +3
            Quote: IRBIS
            3. Armed conflict and nuclear war are two big differences. Personally, do you have a desire to get "Trident" in your city for Syria?

            I don’t.
            But to look inactively at the unpunished actions of mattress makers is to silently admit their "righteousness of force".
      2. alone
        alone 5 September 2013 21: 01 New
        0
        Quote: IRBIS
        VDV 80-82 Today, 20:54 ↑ New
        military! judging by the epaulettes, you are an army general, but by posts do not rustle at all in military affairs! Do you seriously think that for 20 minutes the amers will iron our group ... will everyone else look at it with popcorn ??? 5 minutes after the attack, the amers will begin to have much more serious problems in their homeland and wherever our poplars will fly!


        maybe it's the Commander-in-Chief? or is the minister of defense? tells everything smoothly.
      3. patrianostra
        patrianostra 5 September 2013 22: 46 New
        +2
        It is possible to do as they say in Odessa in different ways soldier the task force in the Gulf of Aden is also maaaaaalenkaya and at the same time on the ships, depending on the class, it is deployed from platoon to company. so if from the composition of the brigades of marines of the BF TOF SF KVF, according to our eternal habit, we pulled where the company is where the division is, as they say to the world. This is such a business trip. As in the days of the USSR, on the island of Sukotra there was a so-called supply base for the Navy, which was covered in shifts by the marines of all the fleets of the USSR somewhere like that. v = yKriDEHvcac This is the same as employees as part of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs and also the Marine Corps fought over the river.
    5. rumpeljschtizhen
      rumpeljschtizhen 5 September 2013 23: 49 New
      0
      dreamer you
  10. aszzz888
    aszzz888 5 September 2013 11: 17 New
    +4
    Operation Commander M., said that the presence of Russian ships would not change anything and would not stop anything (of course, the mericatos) to carry out the order. Self-confident scoundrel!
  11. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 5 September 2013 11: 21 New
    +2
    The main task of our squadron is reconnaissance. As soon as planes take off from American aircraft carriers, and Tomahawks from destroyers and cruisers, a "call to a friend" (Bashar al-Assad) should immediately follow. Friends will have time to prepare for the reflection.
  12. Samy
    Samy 5 September 2013 11: 28 New
    -1
    It seems that our entire cash fleet has gone there ... is there anything left in the bases?
  13. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 5 September 2013 11: 35 New
    +4
    Putin said we won’t fight, everything is clear here.
    We will conduct reconnaissance and target designation, plus cover from various "she drowned" large landing ships, which are clearly not empty. The idea of ​​transferring Kuznetsov to warm waters for the winter is excellent in my opinion, plus to reconnaissance and air defense. Peter covers the north, they are unlikely to pull him.
  14. 1c-inform-city
    1c-inform-city 5 September 2013 12: 02 New
    +2
    At the moment, there are 80 fleet ships in sea voyages (not so few). According to information from Sevastopol, the entire brigade of missile boats in Middle-earth. According to some rumors, 2 helicopter regiments were pulled into Syria.
    1. donavi49
      5 September 2013 12: 21 New
      +2
      At the moment, there are 80 fleet ships in sea voyages (not so few).


      No, everything is taken into account here, even exits to the BP test sites, ordinary soldiers standing on the ears of the Baltic Fleet, on the eve of OSU Zapad-2013.

      And the same Pacific Fleet cannot calm down in any way, for the fourth major exercise in the last 2,5 months. Even in the best Soviet years, this was not often the case.

      According to information from Sevastopol, the entire crew of missile boats in the Mediterranean


      Just getting ready. P-60 went to reconnaissance, in the guard of the BDK. Now Calm is also being prepared by the RCA Ivanovets, he is just now completing the repair. Further in reserve Mirage (the same) and P-60 after preventive repair. These 4 units are cooked on an interchangeable basis.

      According to some rumors, 2 helicopter regiments were pulled into Syria.


      It’s very busy, considering that the only communications are BDK. The flight of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Ilov is now possible only through Bulgaria-Greece and these are civilian sides. BTA does not fly.
      1. 1c-inform-city
        1c-inform-city 5 September 2013 14: 17 New
        0
        To be honest, he was surprised about helicopters. The pilots told the news, and when he found out where they came from, he got really fucked. They said that they were moving from Africa.
    2. PSih2097
      PSih2097 5 September 2013 15: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: 1c-inform-city
      According to information from Sevastopol, the entire crew of missile boats in the Mediterranean.

      then where is "Samum" with "Bora"?
      1. 1c-inform-city
        1c-inform-city 5 September 2013 17: 30 New
        +1
        Samum and Northwind are generally not boats. Even in size they are larger than small missile ships (Mirage, Calm). They probably are not ready or do not want to shine, or maybe they are not sure of reliability (a bunch of engines). Maybe they save fuel.
        1. PSih2097
          PSih2097 5 September 2013 22: 45 New
          +1
          Quote: 1c-inform-city
          Probably not ready or don't want to shine, and maybe not sure about reliability (then a bunch of engines). Maybe they save fuel.

          then what the hell .. in May this year "Bora" did in Turkey?
    3. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 5 September 2013 17: 58 New
      0
      Quote: 1c-inform-city
      At the moment, there are 80 fleet ships in sea voyages (not so few). According to information from Sevastopol, the entire brigade of missile boats in Middle-earth. According to some rumors, 2 helicopter regiments were pulled into Syria.


      Where does this information come from?
      1. 1c-inform-city
        1c-inform-city 6 September 2013 00: 49 New
        +1
        From the fathers of the commanders. This is not an official press release.
  15. tank 34
    tank 34 5 September 2013 12: 37 New
    0
    I agree with the comments that BDK type ships are really a bit too much. The article found a mention of reconnaissance ships. It is interesting that if the Americans really launch a missile strike, our ships will cover the base of the fleet or blow out into the open sea. Indeed, what is in the holds of the BDK?
    1. donavi49
      5 September 2013 12: 54 New
      +3
      I agree with the comments that BDK type ships are really a bit too much.


      So, there is still a serious reserve for BDK, even at the Black Sea Fleet.

      cover the base of the fleet or will be blown into the open sea


      They are initially in the open sea, on the basis of only PM-138, and incoming and outgoing shuttles, tankers, and auxiliary vehicles.

      Indeed, what is in the holds of the BDK?


      When there were the first flights, everyone shouted - they were evacuating the base! However, since the beginning of the year, BDK flights from SLCMs to the Eastern Mediterranean and vice versa were operated under 50. Sometimes some BDKs managed to go there in a month, return and leave again. It’s clear what’s being carried, that’s what nobody will tell you wink .
  16. Evgeniy-111
    Evgeniy-111 5 September 2013 12: 46 New
    +1
    But doesn’t it turn out that ours have collected from Syria everything else that can float?
    1. donavi49
      5 September 2013 13: 02 New
      +2
      Arctic 2013 - about 10 warships, including the world's largest surface ship of the non-aircraft carrier type "Peter the Great", two large landing ships of the Northern Fleet, ACC and KIL forces (which hints at the underwater component).

      In December, the transition of Kuzi from BOD to SM is scheduled.

      Pacific Fleet - Varangian to Australia, and then to SM. The next detachment for anti-piracy shift (BOD, tanker, tug) is being formed.

      BF - everyone is getting ready for WEST-2013, they’re running around. From the plans, Yaroslav the Wise at the end of the year will leave somewhere.

      So, far from everything, even in a planned, not emergency mode.
  17. SIBIR38RUS
    SIBIR38RUS 5 September 2013 13: 05 New
    +9
    We collected everything we could. Well ... waiting on September 9th. If the United States decides to strike at Syria, then I really hope that in a couple of days an unexpected "surprise" will be arranged for the Americans and news around the world will announce: September 11, the 6th US Fleet tragically ceased to exist!
    1. 0255
      0255 5 September 2013 13: 19 New
      +5
      Quote: SIBIR38RUS
      We collected everything we could. Well ... waiting on September 9th. If the United States decides to strike at Syria, then I really hope that in a couple of days an unexpected "surprise" will be arranged for the Americans and news around the world will announce: September 11, the 6th US Fleet tragically ceased to exist!

      Then it would be better to launch Topol-M missiles at the US if they hit Syria. At the same time, we would see how effective their missile defense system is in Europe, and whether the F-35 intercepts them so well, as the Americans tell us.
  18. 1961NNN
    1961NNN 5 September 2013 13: 43 New
    +3
    "The underwater component is secret, but for sure there is not just one boat. " This is one hundred pounds - "1" is there and not one !!!
    1. little man
      little man 6 September 2013 01: 16 New
      +1
      Guys, there may be enough illusions. Well, as long as you can from Yugoslavia-tear all.
      1. stalkerwalker
        stalkerwalker 6 September 2013 01: 24 New
        +5
        Quote: man
        Guys, there may be enough illusions.

        All actions of the Russian Navy can be titled as an answer to the "mattress" - "Are you going to fight? Well, we'll see how you do it."
        Both Lavrov and the GDP popularly explained the other day that we are not going to fight.
        No need to cry ...
        By the way, we must not forget about the Iranian Navy, even though they are of "local" importance - the Persian Gulf - the Arabian Sea.
  19. anton197107
    anton197107 5 September 2013 14: 10 New
    +3
    Let's hope that the "hygemon" will get what they deserve for a long time
  20. SIBIR38RUS
    SIBIR38RUS 5 September 2013 14: 32 New
    +3
    As it was accepted that the danger zones and territories are fenced with red ribbons, flags, etc. Amer apparently still do not understand that ALL OUR TERRITORY IS A CONTINUOUS RED FLAG! RED CAR! It remains only to add that there is no need to wake the bear from the den !!! Ask for your mother! Let’s put it in the most .... Now, the appeal itself for the present NATO army fanatics is: PRAY AND BE AFRAID TO BE SOVIET! (AT THIS MOMENT RUSSIAN) Strategic Missile Forces, Submarine Cruisers, BZHRK it.p. DO NOT TEST ALL YOUR OPPORTUNITIES ON EXPERIENCED Bunnies! IN THIS CASE IT'S YOU ... if there is a war between the United States and Russia, then do not wait for a local war .. AUG will not save you. Missiles will fly ...............
  21. KazaK Bo
    KazaK Bo 5 September 2013 17: 12 New
    +4
    Far from the Navy ... read all the comments ... but nevertheless "got it" - a lot of them are pulled up to the Mediterranean Sea region, but not our last pennants ... of course, our AUG is not there, but it is enough to put the SCANDAL in the "respectable" western family.
    There are many questions - what the BDK is being carried - is it really not clear, it's hot in the SYRIA area ... that's probably what they are carrying our "ice cream" - eskimo ... other ice cream ... to sailors and soldiers of the Syrian army ...
    By the way all our other ships "scattered" across the waters of the seas and oceans .... I understood the same - we are preparing for a very big commotion ... the "noise" will be very big ... THE DISTRIBUTION OF FORCES AND FUNDS OF THE NAVY ...
    Or I'm wrong?
    1. Ruslan_F38
      Ruslan_F38 5 September 2013 18: 10 New
      +1
      Quote: KazaK Bo
      It is not in vain that the Navy's forces and assets are distributed ...
      Or I'm wrong?

      Time will tell, wait a bit. In any case, it would be better if the United States came to their senses and came to their senses.
  22. Bob
    Bob 5 September 2013 18: 20 New
    +1
    Mattresses stubbornly run into trouble, which will receive in full.
    It's time to pay the bills, or they naively believe that they bought off the money for the "Kursk", forgot the old Russian proverb - As it goes around, it will respond !?, and also - Time to throw stones and time to collect them. So the time has come to collect. The forces of the Russian Navy are dispersed along strategic directions. Peter the Great is listening to the North, West and East are listening to the whole group located there.
    The main striking force of the Amer Navy is AUG, and the main prize is an aircraft carrier. When they start to naughty with axes, I think none of the interested parties will remain unanswered.
  23. biglow
    biglow 5 September 2013 18: 26 New
    +2
    Disconnection of forces in the Mediterranean
    1. Rus2012
      Rus2012 5 September 2013 18: 32 New
      +2
      Quote: biglow
      Disconnection of forces in the Mediterranean

      Competent alignment of our forces. Especially if you assume the presence of shock nuclear submarines behind the Yankees. A layered sandwich will turn out :)
    2. MG42
      MG42 5 September 2013 19: 14 New
      +2
      Quote: biglow
      Disconnection of forces in the Mediterranean

      Just a little complement the picture >>
      Yes, there is shown in the corner separately AUG with the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) and AUG with the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN-68) will go through the Red Sea in the coming days .. The range of the released tomahawks with escort destroyers 2500 km, will reach .
      There was already a leak in the Amer press that Obama would order the attack in any decision of the congress and the ships would play the leading role.

      F / A-18 Hornet Combat radius: 740-1065 km F / A-18E / F Super Hornet combat radius: 726 km

      20.08.2013
      AUG Harry S. Truman passed the Suez Canal into the Red Sea.

      The carrier strike group Harry S. Truman (HST CSG) on August 18, after passing through the Suez Canal, entered the zone of responsibility of the 5th US fleet, the official website of the American fleet reports.

      The 10th HST CSG carrier strike group includes the USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) multi-role aircraft carrier, Arleigh Burke USS Bulkeley destroyers (DDG 84), USS Mason (DDG 87), and the Ticonderoga USS Gettysburg URO cruiser ( CG 64), USS San Jacinto (CG 56) and the combined headquarters of the 1st destroyer squadron, consisting of US and British Navy personnel.

      The USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) is home to the 3rd Air Wing (CVW 3), which includes fighter squadrons: VFA-32 "Swordsmen", "VFA-37" Ragin 'Bulls "and VFA-105" Gunslingers "; naval fighter-assault squadron VMFA-312 "Checkerboards"; early warning squadron VAW-126 "Seahawks"; electronic warfare squadron VAQ-130 "Zappers"; the HSC-7 "Dusty Dogs" combat support helicopter squadron; and the HSM-74 "Swamp Foxes" multipurpose helicopter squadron.

      http://www.ckp-vmf.ru/news.html?id=1376982361

      here on the video is a photo of the USS Harry S. Truman wing
      1. MG42
        MG42 5 September 2013 20: 24 New
        +4
        In the Mediterranean, there are currently five destroyers and the US Navy's San Antonio Universal Landing Ship (UDC), which could be used in a military operation.

        The composition of the AUG with the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN-68)

        The aircraft carrier Nimitz, as well as the accompanying three destroyers William P. Lawrence, Stockdale and Shoup and the cruiser Princeton, as noted by the Pentagon spokesman , "took a position that would enable them to respond to various unforeseen situations."

        In total, these destroyers have approximately 200 Tomahawk missiles.

        The landing ship of San Antonio, on board of which there are 300 marines and a variety of communications. The ship was removed from another mission.
        San Antonio can serve as a floating base, which can be used by special forces if they are involved in the operation.

        That's it. True, it is unknown what the Americans have there under water .. request

        USS Nimitz CVN-68 2013
    3. PSih2097
      PSih2097 5 September 2013 22: 40 New
      0
      Quote: biglow
      Disconnection of forces in the Mediterranean

      and where are our loaves and sharks with Warsaw?
    4. 1c-inform-city
      1c-inform-city 6 September 2013 00: 52 New
      0
      recourse And the pipa of our boats is not there.
  24. coserg 2012
    coserg 2012 5 September 2013 19: 32 New
    0
    America stupidly rested, and I don’t think that it will collapse. And then, damn it again, Russia will be to blame!
  25. SIBIR38RUS
    SIBIR38RUS 5 September 2013 19: 57 New
    +2
    If America rakes on the water at least a little, then it is possible with 100% probability to wait for a ground operation ... maybe ours and Syria are waiting for this. I agree that this is not the jungle of Vietnam, but fighting in an urban setting is serious. They underestimate the enemy! This is not Libya with Yugoslavia which could have been mercilessly bombed and not Iraq which we drove like a skating rink! Syria has serious weapons! Get bogged down no worse than in Afghanistan .. run out of steam. And then e ... take it !!!
  26. sergant89
    sergant89 5 September 2013 21: 07 New
    +2
    I would like to write the slogans about the praise of our fleet, but 80% of our ships are frankly rusty, God forbid that they can complete all the tasks that they will have to do, we must take the whole oligarchy with pederasty and restore the Fleet and the Army, not 3 take a boat and a boat a year to serve the Motherland, now you can minus it.
  27. GUSAR
    GUSAR 5 September 2013 21: 53 New
    +1
    It is certainly great that Our fleet is there, but the question is, how much, God forbid, in which case Ours will last? ...
    1. donavi49
      6 September 2013 09: 30 New
      +1
      The Mediterranean Sea trap is worse than the Black or Caspian. With the proper attire of the NATO Air Force, even the combined fleet just not NATO will be destroyed in 1-2 days. Answer? Many submarines of the Navy of the NATO countries in a closed theater. Surrounding airbases, lumbago of the whole sea, even with coastal harpoons / exosets and otomars.

      Therefore, there is only passive assistance to the ATS (calculation of trajectories and transmission of information about flights / launches). In the case of a real battle, the question is not how long they will last, but how much they will take with them. These are the features of the theater.
    2. GDP
      GDP 8 September 2013 12: 11 New
      0
      If ours would strike first, taking into account the capabilities of the cruiser "Moskva", then they would immediately halve their entire grouping, and then most likely ours would be crushed, albeit with heavy losses (This is if the nuclear submarine is not there). If the Americans strike first, they will sink all our ships almost immediately ...
  28. nightingale
    nightingale 6 September 2013 00: 35 New
    0
    Moscow is already serious. BDK for the evacuation of ours from Syria there are about a hundred thousand, well, they are bringing something to restore equipment in Syria after the bombing.
  29. saag
    saag 6 September 2013 08: 33 New
    0
    Quote: SIBIR38RUS
    If America rakes on the water at least a little

    For instance? From whom, with what and for what reason?
  30. Crang
    Crang 7 September 2013 16: 37 New
    +1
    Straaaashnaya power in our Mediterranean. Believe the respectable uncles from the TV which communists were bad and how everything became good now. How we are developing great. Especially delivers a view of the death squad as part of:
    - tugboat MB-304
    - floating ship PM-138
    - tugboat "Evgeny Khorov"
    - tanker "Ivan Bubnov"
    The flankman of this flying death and storm squadron of the US aircraft carriers will probably be the Yelnya tanker - the epic appearance speaks for itself. Without tires hung on the sides, it looks very good.
    The headquarters will sit on a broken-down BOD "Admiral Kulakov", which will be pre-trimmed and painted with oil paint with a brush. The left wing is a large landing craft of the "Minsk" type, etc.
    Damn, it's sickening to look at all this. 100 years ago, in the Russo-Japanese War, our fleet was more powerful than it is now in absolute terms. Where to climb then? What if the Chechen fighters lost the war? Now they are driving polished Mercedes cars, and we are driving the rotten BOD Admiral Kulakov. What can he do to the US Navy?
    1. GDP
      GDP 8 September 2013 12: 14 New
      0
      Intelligence ... Evacuation of values ​​... Training in combat ... Analysis of the combat capabilities of potential adversaries and our air defense systems among the Syrians. Support and supply of a friendly state ... There is a point!