Military Review

Russia sent to the shores of Syria reconnaissance ship "Priazovye"

31
Russia sent to the shores of Syria reconnaissance ship "Priazovye"



Russia's Defense Ministry has decided to increase the number of scout ships in the Mediterranean Sea for better lighting conditions near the coast of Syria, a source in the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces.

“Strengthening the actions to open and cover the situation in the sea areas adjacent to the Syrian coast will be due to a slight increase in the number of Russian reconnaissance ships in the Mediterranean Sea,” said a source, ITAR-TASS.

“In particular, on Sunday the Black Sea reconnaissance ship set off for the Syrian shores fleet “The Azov Sea,” he specified.

Last week, a source in the Russian General Staff reported that the command of the Russian Navy, in connection with the situation around Syria, decided to update the ship composition of the permanent operational connection in the Mediterranean. In the coming days, a large anti-submarine ship of the Northern Fleet will replenish the Navy grouping. And later, “the missile cruiser of the Black Sea Fleet“ Moscow ”will join it, which is now completing tasks in the North Atlantic and will soon begin the transatlantic transition towards the Strait of Gibraltar.

Note that the French frigate Chevalier Paul ("Chevalier Paul"), one of the most modern in the French fleet, also sailed to the eastern part of the Mediterranean.

In addition, there are five US warships equipped with cruise missiles in the region — the destroyers Stout, Makhan, Gravely, Barry, and Reymage. Also 18 August in the Arabian Sea arrived a group of ships as part of the aircraft carrier "Harry Truman", missile cruisers "Gettysburg" and "San Jacinto", destroyers "Balkeli" and "Mason". In addition to them, in the zone are "Nimitz" and a group of support ships. Moreover, the duty of some ships had already come to an end, but they remained in the region by order of the command of the US Navy.

The situation around Syria escalated after August 21 media, citing opposition to the statements reported the alleged use of chemical weapons in the suburbs of Damascus. Thereafter, in the West, where the application formerly known as sarin Syrian authorities under direct intervention in the conflict, openly talking about a possible military intervention in the Arab republic.
Originator:
http://www.vz.ru/news/2013/9/2/648249.html
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 3 September 2013 07: 47 New
    0
    But is it only a scout ??? it is not yet known what he has on board there (maybe a radiator which thread ..)
    1. Orel
      Orel 3 September 2013 08: 02 New
      20
      But is it only a scout ??? it is not yet known what he has on board there (maybe a radiator which thread ..)


      It is enough to simply transmit data on the launches of cruise missiles, takeoffs of fighter and bomber aircraft, as well as the location of ships and submarines, to Syrian air defense. I hope the rest will be done by Syrian air defense.
      1. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 3 September 2013 08: 21 New
        +1
        Quote: Orel
        it is not yet known what he has on board there

        It’s more likely under water. Maybe some submarine with ali cruise missile anti-ship missiles! winked
      2. artemiy
        artemiy 3 September 2013 09: 48 New
        0
        We still have submarines there!
        1. Canep
          Canep 3 September 2013 10: 15 New
          +3
          There would be a couple of A-50 to shift shifts to send. Americans will not dare to “crush” these radars, in any case I hope so.
  2. Cormorants
    Cormorants 3 September 2013 07: 48 New
    +6
    Will track missile launches and transmit coordinates to Syrian missiles wassat
    1. Cynic
      Cynic 3 September 2013 16: 38 New
      0
      Quote: Cormorants
      Will track missile launches

      Our launches of BR are monitored from home, I think the matter will not be for the KR, but, in any case, a clear demonstration of solidarity with the people of Syria!
      And the data from the ship of the Russian Navy is purely psychologically reliable and more adequate to perception than any other data!
      Yes, regarding the availability of our ships. To be honest, holivar is everything!
  3. Skarte
    Skarte 3 September 2013 07: 48 New
    +6
    He who is warned is armed! We will work with our ears, since fists do not work)
  4. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 3 September 2013 07: 49 New
    -1
    Kuznetsov needs to be sent.
    1. sergey72
      sergey72 3 September 2013 07: 51 New
      10
      Kuznetsov’s power plant is dead and there are almost no air groups.
      1. Canep
        Canep 3 September 2013 10: 18 New
        -2
        I heard the news that "Kuznetsov is already going there."
  5. Cormorants
    Cormorants 3 September 2013 07: 51 New
    +1
    How many ships are being pulled there. No matter how they shoot each other. Syria we are with you.
  6. dojjdik
    dojjdik 3 September 2013 07: 51 New
    +2
    “Nimitz” itself is actually a “big stadium”. the most dangerous are AWACS planes; but Syria has good “jammers” of our development; Well, mobile air defense (beech, torus) fl against the "axes" (state junk); of course it would be nice to fill up the deck aircraft, even more than 50ml loss to the states immediately
    1. smart ass
      smart ass 3 September 2013 08: 05 New
      13
      Exactly 50 million loss !! A country that prints money from waste paper !! Cool) Significant damage to the United States can be done by killing as many marines as possible, but in general it would be more mormal
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 3 September 2013 08: 15 New
        +6
        Quote: Clever man
        but in general it would be mormalad to destroy Avik

        Or two ... winked
      2. queen
        queen 3 September 2013 08: 28 New
        +4
        Quote: Clever man
        but in general it would be mormalad to destroy Avik

        And in chocolate to capture))) their brain would not have realized)
    2. shark
      shark 3 September 2013 08: 22 New
      12
      Failing an aircraft carrier is certainly good, but it would be more effective to sink a landing ship with 2000 marines on board. God forgive me! but it would have a huge resonance, from such losses amers simply fall into a stupor
      1. awg75
        awg75 3 September 2013 08: 35 New
        +5
        Americans will stupidly infuriate from such losses and create a new Hiroshima in Syria
        1. shark
          shark 3 September 2013 08: 41 New
          +5
          it’s one thing to iron innocent with axes, another to catch the carcasses of fur seals in an amount commensurate with the population of a small town ..
      2. Hitrovan07
        Hitrovan07 3 September 2013 11: 55 New
        +3
        You forgot the strength of the aircraft carrier: crew - 3200 people,
        wing - 2480 people (took from the wiki - but about a shard of 6 thousand).
    3. Oleg14774
      Oleg14774 3 September 2013 18: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: dojjdik
      would fill up a decked aircraft - even more than 50ml loss to states immediately

      And better two, no, three, no, all the same, better than four.
      But seriously, it would be better if there wasn’t a war anyway, and if it starts, then bring everything down, together with the AUG. It’s not a pity, since they are bombing children, and the elderly, and women.
  7. Circle
    Circle 3 September 2013 07: 55 New
    +1
    It seems that the reason for the delay in the attack was shot down by Syrian air defense F-22 and four tamahawks (the main weapon of democratization). If so, then Russia is not so aloof as many want to imagine http://svpressa.ru/war21/article/73572/?rpop=1
    1. Rus_87
      Rus_87 3 September 2013 07: 59 New
      +4

      http://svpressa.ru/war21/article/73572/?rpop=1
      Something really looks like a duck ...
      1. d1m1drol
        d1m1drol 3 September 2013 10: 33 New
        0
        Yesterday there was a refutation. What they say was seen near the borders, but they didn’t begin to beat .. sorry.
  8. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 3 September 2013 07: 59 New
    +3
    Nevermind yourself group deployed recourse
    So this wasn’t yet considered by everyone, although it wasn’t sour: 7 Berkov, 2 Ticonderoga, 2 aircraft carriers, at least 2 Los Angeles nuclear submarines, the Nimitz military security warrant, most likely one more of the 4 "Ohio," under the cruise missiles re-sharpened. Somehow, even in theory, their first MRAU is difficult to calculate.
    1. little man
      little man 3 September 2013 09: 57 New
      0
      It looks like a large-scale exercise. Where Syria is a great learning target.
  9. Dwarfik
    Dwarfik 3 September 2013 08: 37 New
    0
    Information is never superfluous.
  10. Sirs
    Sirs 3 September 2013 08: 38 New
    +1
    I’m just fooling how a separate country can vote in a parliament to blow one or another country, I understand if this camp acted on its own, otherwise it turns out the whole NATO block and individual states shout "we go north, we go north ... "already anticipating how their owner will throw a bone for gnawing.
    These states must have a sense of national dignity.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 3 September 2013 09: 13 New
      0
      NATO has already stated that it will not take part in the operation, however, individual members will. At the same time, in the event of a regime’s attack on these members (a thick hint of Turkey), NATO will act on the basis of instructions to attack the Alliance.
  11. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 3 September 2013 08: 42 New
    +5
    Quote: dojjdik
    floor against the "axes" (staff junk);

    Do not want to show us the Russian development of a similar purpose and capabilities or with superior parameters, which is in service. Only do not wag chur - ship / boat option.
    And tell me, just without resentment, have you ever heard anything about BLOCK modernization programs with digital cameras? After all, they are very widespread not only on SLCM Tomahok, but the tactical fighter F-16C / D "Faiting Falcon" Block 50. And what about modernization programs with an alphanumeric Latin index?
    1. dojjdik
      dojjdik 3 September 2013 09: 12 New
      0
      Yes, do not juggle with terms; Have you ever sat at the radar? they lie the main “friend: stranger”, and the strobe and start are almost the same; and yet we, and especially Syria, do not need offensive weapons; but for the defensive we have a turn
  12. Vtel
    Vtel 3 September 2013 09: 04 New
    -1
    Our scout will be like a bone in his throat.
  13. Wedmak
    Wedmak 3 September 2013 09: 13 New
    +2
    The parties stand in battle formations. It remains to wait, who will begin the first active action.
    1. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 3 September 2013 10: 34 New
      -2
      it wouldn’t be a bad idea to open a ball in Russia by hammering on missile defense facilities)) Then a dumb scene wakes up, then a tantrum, but here the most important thing is to slap a tantrum (USA) in time to bring it to life. The risk is of course present, but still.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 3 September 2013 13: 18 New
        +1
        Rather, it will not be a mute scene, but a retaliatory strike by ICBMs. Enough hawks in the Pentagon. Including to remove Obama from command and unleash a war game.
        1. Bashkaus
          Bashkaus 3 September 2013 17: 11 New
          0
          Rather, it will not be a mute scene, but a retaliatory strike by ICBMs. Enough hawks in the Pentagon. Including to remove Obama from command and unleash a war game.
          This is exactly where I disagree with you at the root and will argue upholding my position:
          The United States has the illusion of the imaginary security they receive from missile defense, so their whole philosophy boils down to the fact that in the event of a conflict with the Russian Federation they are so good at killing most of our missiles with their missile defense, while they deliver us an unrequited blow.
          Therefore, Russia is doomed to FIRST to begin all this catastrophe with a preemptive strike on missile defense positions, the destruction of these positions guarantee the safe launch of our missiles, another way out, wait for the US attack and launch missiles in response knowing that they will be shot down.
          And as soon as the missile defense is withdrawn from the game, someone likes it or not, but all the Americans’s plans for an unrequited strike come to naught, they face the only option for a retaliatory nuclear strike with all the ensuing consequences with "unacceptable damage" to them. And then another question arises, it’s one thing to wave your fists with a shield from a missile defense system and to hope for its protection and it’s quite another to get into a fight knowingly aware of the fatal outcome in any story. The principle of guaranteed mutual destruction allowed the world to survive the extra 50 years until the United States withdrew from the treaty.
          That is why I believe that in the event of an aggravation of the situation, Russia needs to be awakened to strike first, we have nothing to lose, but America will have to think hard after that whether they are sure of the correctness of their actions.
          Correct me if I am not right not with minuses, but with convincing arguments)))
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 3 September 2013 17: 52 New
            0
            I don’t minus adequate interlocutors, no matter how our opinions differ.
            I don’t think that Americans really hope for their missile defense. How many are there? Well, they will intercept a dozen rockets, the rest will break through. Damage will not be acceptable in any case. Neither for us nor for them.
            We will destroy the west of the USA, they will destroy the central part and factories in the Urals. Two countries will disappear as a whole. But the problem is that the USA is fenced off from the rest by the oceans and possibly will be reborn, and our territory will be open to everyone - grab whoever you want, China, Europe, they will want to piece by piece. And people like McCain (and there are behind the scenes and worse) will make sacrifices for the destruction of Russia.
  14. EtickayaSila
    EtickayaSila 3 September 2013 09: 16 New
    +6
    Yes, yes, yes .... it already reminds me of something ... I remember that during the barbaric destruction of Yugoslavia, Borya, threateningly blowing his cheeks, also sent some reconnaissance ship to the region. The NATO was sooo afraid of him.
    1. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 3 September 2013 10: 35 New
      +3
      I don’t remember how they were afraid of Boria, but the whole NATO unit was even considered with two hundred paratroopers who appeared in the pristine as a devil from a snuffbox.
  15. shinobi
    shinobi 3 September 2013 09: 21 New
    0
    It’s quite expected in general that. And it’s logical. And the whole ship’s grouping there just to protect a couple of small, modest little boats. May God forbid the mattresses have a desire to capture them. Actually this fact makes it cool to scratch the Yankees strategists in the back of the head, they they themselves admitted, since these boats negate the surprise of the strike for Syrian air defense. Asymmetric answer, so to speak.
    1. MstislavHrabr
      MstislavHrabr 3 September 2013 09: 38 New
      +1
      An asymmetric response will be in the event of a Syrian strike in response to the oil producing regions of Qatar and Saul Arabia ...
  16. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 3 September 2013 09: 36 New
    0
    Quote: dojjdik
    Have you ever sat at the radar? lie there the main "friend: stranger"

    I saw only in general terms - not my shift, my department is much lower in the corps. I saw the defective reports on the radar of the ships - the final summary for the Commander of the Fleet was made by me.
    Quote: dojjdik
    we, and especially Syria, do not need offensive weapons; but for the defensive we have a turn

    Here with the first part of the phrase - I agree to all 100-500! With the second part, no. Where is the turn? Give a link - I admit that I’m not right drinks
  17. uhu189
    uhu189 3 September 2013 09: 47 New
    0
    I would like to believe that the concentration of the ships of our fleet will help stop the USA and make the thugs driving there think a little about what they are doing ... At least a week has passed, but no blows have happened, so there is some benefit ...
    1. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus 3 September 2013 10: 44 New
      0
      My short-term forecast for a month or two: War does not wake.
      Now Moscow is going there, as I understand it, the Varangian should wake up to join it, if this is true, then the very powerful group C300 Reef will cover the Syrian coast and there’s nothing to figure out where and where it flies in the affected area, to land everything indiscriminately. And who doesn't like it, 32 KR Volcano instead of a tub of cold water.
  18. little man
    little man 3 September 2013 09: 48 New
    -1
    That is good. This is an adult. +
    And the photo is nice.
  19. yan
    yan 3 September 2013 09: 49 New
    0
    Strengthening the grouping is the right thing, the question is how it will be used
  20. denson06
    denson06 3 September 2013 09: 49 New
    0
    Quote: Clever man
    Exactly 50 million loss !! A country that prints money from waste paper !! Cool) Significant damage to the United States can be done by killing as many marines as possible, but in general it would be more mormal

    Looking at what distance the ships will be .. and depending on what the Syrians have ..
  21. Kavtorang
    Kavtorang 3 September 2013 09: 51 New
    +2
    Quote: shinobi
    this fact makes the Yankees strategically scratch their heads at the back of the head, they themselves admitted, since these boats negate the surprise of the strike for Syrian air defense. The asymmetric answer, so to speak.

    Yes, well - come up with the same thing. They decide to beat - they will beat. The forces and assets in the theater are concentrated with a guaranteed margin. What is there - enough to break through any air defense system - just oversaturated channels.
    Do not exaggerate the capabilities of the missile defense system - yesterday the forum member GUNNERMINER gave a brief but comprehensive information on these ships.
    Indeed, if the SRZK crew buys gadgets in automobile stores for their money with a combination of the GPS function and some other crap and RU fleet, this turns a blind eye ... What are we talking about?
    1. uhu189
      uhu189 3 September 2013 10: 02 New
      +4
      And what is there to come up with - I don’t know what you managed to bring to Syria, and what is there. We will not guess, if God forbid, a blow happens, then in the course of the play we will judge who buys what there and in which stores. So far, the fact is clear - despite a very militant rhetoric a week has passed - and nothing. And half of those who threatened loudly were already blown away, so it is not so simple, and obviously this is not with a lack of evidence about the chemical. the attack is connected ... Judge by deeds, not by words ...
  22. Circle
    Circle 3 September 2013 13: 02 New
    +1
    Urgently. Less than 5 minutes of news.
    Russian Defense Ministry recorded a launch two ballistic goals towards the eastern Mediterranean. http://russian.rt.com/article/14893
    1. GRDS
      GRDS 3 September 2013 14: 45 New
      +1
      http://ria.ru/world/20130903/960431214.html

      TEL AVIV, Sep 3 - RIA News. Launches recorded in the Mediterranean were carried out by Israel together with the United States, the representative of the Israeli Ministry of Defense told RIA Novosti.

      "The launches were carried out as part of joint tests with the United States. Missiles were launched from the Mediterranean Sea and successfully tracked by radar in Israel," the source said.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 3 September 2013 15: 52 New
        +1
        Israel decided to play a little on the nerves.
  23. biglow
    biglow 3 September 2013 15: 10 New
    0
    It seems that the main arsonist of the war is not located overseas but near Syria. Forgetting in Israel that there’s a wind, you will reap a storm. It will be funny when all the bearded forget for a while about strife and unite against Israel ....
  24. And Us Rat
    And Us Rat 10 November 2013 02: 16 New
    0
    Quote: Clever man
    Exactly 50 million loss !! A country that prints money from waste paper !! Cool) Significant damage to the United States can be done by killing as many marines as possible, but in general it would be more mormal


    RED ALERT steers casually, but we live in the real world - 2 countries with bottomless thermonuclear arsenals will not shoot at each other. Even into the air. This is a game of who will look at whom, it will end, as always. bully
  25. And Us Rat
    And Us Rat 10 November 2013 02: 24 New
    0
    Quote: Oleg147741
    Quote: dojjdik
    would fill up a decked aircraft - even more than 50ml loss to states immediately

    And better two, no, three, no, all the same, better than four.
    But seriously, it would be better if there wasn’t a war anyway, and if it starts, then bring everything down, together with the AUG. It’s not a pity, since they are bombing children, and the elderly, and women.


    They also shouted about Russia that they bombed women and old people, both during Afghanistan and during Chechnya, and do you still have your tongue turning to complain about double standards? What would you understand - I'm not a fan of the Yusovites, I'm just allergic to lecimer.
  26. And Us Rat
    And Us Rat 10 November 2013 02: 27 New
    0
    Quote: Circle
    It seems that the reason for the delay in the attack was shot down by Syrian air defense F-22 and four tamahawks (the main weapon of democratization). If so, then Russia is not so aloof as many want to imagine http://svpressa.ru/war21/article/73572/?rpop=1


    If it swims like a duck and quacks like a duck ....... well, you get the idea. yes
  27. And Us Rat
    And Us Rat 10 November 2013 02: 41 New
    0
    Quote: Bashkaus
    My short-term forecast for a month or two: War does not wake.
    Now Moscow is going there, as I understand it, the Varangian should wake up to join it, if this is true, then the very powerful group C300 Reef will cover the Syrian coast and there’s nothing to figure out where and where it flies in the affected area, to land everything indiscriminately. And who doesn't like it, 32 KR Volcano instead of a tub of cold water.


    5 November 2013 - representatives of the American administration confirmed the fact that a missile strike on the air defense base in Latakia was carried out by the IDF air force. lol
  28. And Us Rat
    And Us Rat 10 November 2013 02: 46 New
    0
    Quote: biglow
    It seems that the main arsonist of the war is not located overseas but near Syria. Forgetting in Israel that there’s a wind, you will reap a storm. It will be funny when all the bearded forget for a while about strife and unite against Israel ....


    Wah Baius, Baius laughing