Military Review

Arkomok Center has developed a protective kit for a new generation tank crew member

57
Arkomok Center has developed a protective kit for a new generation tank crew member



Armocom Center - the leading developer and manufacturer of personal and comprehensive protective equipment in Russia, has developed a protective kit for a crew member tank new generation.

The new protective kompekt is designed to protect the crew members of armored vehicles from the effects of damaging elements arising in the reserved manned compartment, and from thermal effects.

The structure of the new set includes: body armor, splinter plate on the standard headset, protective overalls.

The weight of the kit is 5,8kg, while the protection area is around 213дm2, the anti-splinter resistance of the body armor is V50 protection level of at least 550M / C. The kit provides protection against exposure to open flames of at least 25.

The kit ensures the preservation of protective properties at a temperature range of operation from -50 ° С to + 50 ° С, exposure to precipitation, after 4-x multiple degassing, disinfection, decontamination, as well as after exposure to fuels and lubricants and special liquids used in the operation of BM.

All armored elements of the product are made of ballistic fabric based on high-strength domestic fiber Armos with water-repellent treatment.

Overalls, outer covers of the bulletproof vest and lining are made of fire-resistant camouflage fabric.

Structurally, the bullet-proof vest consists of detachable chest and dorsal sets, a turn-down collar, on the cover of the bulletproof vest there are patch pockets for accommodating standard equipment and an evacuation device.
Originator:
http://www.armouredvehicle.info/?p=1101
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. evgenii67
    evgenii67 28 August 2013 07: 05 New
    +1
    For old tanks, this kit is not relevant?
  2. gud123
    gud123 28 August 2013 07: 10 New
    14
    It is relevant for all types, including the T-34 !!! good
    1. soldat1945
      soldat1945 28 August 2013 07: 13 New
      10
      Yes, it would be faster to see all the miracles on living soldiers, otherwise you would be tired of watching news from exhibitions!
      1. Aryan
        Aryan 28 August 2013 09: 31 New
        +1
        "and evacuation device"
        Is it a bulletproof vest with a catapult? belay
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 28 August 2013 12: 04 New
          +3
          Most likely a special loop in the pocket on the back, for which you can pull the tankman out of the car. Good stuff.
  3. Professor
    Professor 28 August 2013 07: 36 New
    +1
    Arkomok Center has developed a protective kit for a new generation tank crew member

    Better later than never.

    Structurally, the bullet-proof vest consists of detachable chest and dorsal sets, a turn-down collar, on the cover of the bulletproof vest there are patch pockets for accommodating standard equipment and an evacuation device.

    What kind of terrible animal is this "evacuation device"? As in the IDF, a handle on the back for pulling out a fighter?

    PS
    Headphones, however, are not on the ears; it seems to me that a helmet will not allow them to be placed properly. sad
    1. ICT
      ICT 28 August 2013 07: 49 New
      +2
      Quote: Professor
      "evacuation device"?


      or as it should have been under the Union
      1. Professor
        Professor 28 August 2013 07: 55 New
        +1
        Quote: TIT
        or as it should have been under the Union

        I am interested in the technical performance of such a big name.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 28 August 2013 08: 12 New
          +2
          Most likely this thing will be initially sewn into overalls
          1. fisherman
            fisherman 28 August 2013 08: 19 New
            +1
            something aviation is guessing at this

            for sau no longer suitable
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 28 August 2013 08: 23 New
              +1
              Why? In my opinion the opposite. A long strap for self-propelled guns is needed than for a tank or infantry fighting vehicle.
              1. fisherman
                fisherman 28 August 2013 08: 33 New
                +1
                Lopatov, I don’t know if I understood correctly, if you are talking about the double loop on the uniform (instead of the handle for which the crew is pulled out), then, of course, yes ... there is more space - it’s also longer

                and if it’s supposed to be some tricky attachment to a chair ... here, only to assume
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 28 August 2013 08: 37 New
                  +2
                  This is not a "tricky attachment to a chair", this is an evacuation strap Ш-4
                  Here's a thing:
                  1. fisherman
                    fisherman 28 August 2013 08: 39 New
                    +1
                    clear

                    the loop that is always on you
        2. Zhenya
          Zhenya 28 August 2013 08: 20 New
          +3
          Who has big names is the Americans, although in fact they are sucked from the finger.
    2. Lopatov
      Lopatov 28 August 2013 07: 56 New
      0
      Most likely double loop
    3. Zhenya
      Zhenya 28 August 2013 08: 04 New
      0
      Dear professor, I will say this. A couple of years ago, "cowboys" promised and where are they? Probably 5 tank crews. Another divorce of which in single parties will go to the troops.
  4. fisherman
    fisherman 28 August 2013 07: 42 New
    +2
    Headphones, however, are not on the ears; it seems to me that a helmet will not allow them to be placed properly.


    so after all there is not a full-fledged helmet (helmet), but only an anti-splinter pad, maybe they will sit as relatives

    need to measure :)
  5. Basileus
    Basileus 28 August 2013 07: 46 New
    +2
    We didn’t have time to equip the people with "Cowboy", they had already come up with some new set. It would be interesting to hear how this form differs from the same "Cowboy".
  6. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 28 August 2013 07: 48 New
    +4
    All armored elements of the product are made of ballistic fabric based on high strength domestic fiber Armos with water-, oil-repellent treatment.
    The main thing is that our domestic development material !!!
    1. Professor
      Professor 28 August 2013 07: 53 New
      13
      Quote: MIKHAN
      The main thing is that our domestic development material !!!

      The main thing is that it does not burn on the fighters and does not melt, but protects them as it should, and there even if it is developed in Georgia.
    2. military
      military 28 August 2013 13: 00 New
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      The main thing is that our domestic development material !!!

      the main thing is that according to the results of the forthcoming "tenders", the final manufacturers do not turn out to be illegal Asian migrants ...
  7. aud13
    aud13 28 August 2013 07: 57 New
    +1
    The face is open ...
    Also, in theory, it can suffer in a fire.
    Is it really impossible to come up with something?
    1. Professor
      Professor 28 August 2013 08: 12 New
      10
      Quote: aud13
      Is it really impossible to come up with something?

      No need to reinvent the wheel, everything has already been invented. There is a special mask.
      Here is my last year’s comment on a similar topic.
      http://topwar.ru/12617-tankistam-bronezhilet-i-shlem.html#comment-id-250120


      Apart from the "non-burning" overalls, helmet and Kevlar body armor, the Israelis also have obligatory non-burning gloves and an optional non-burning mask.

      Here and above for a fighter in such a suit. On the back under the "Velcro" (textile fastener) the mentioned handle.
      The photo below is a front view of the jumpsuits.


      Helmet and chebchik.


      On the fighter left bronik.



      And here’s the kit: helmet, armor, gloves and jumpsuit.


      http://www.supervideo.com/MXCD-ROMOS.htm
      1. yanus
        yanus 28 August 2013 08: 16 New
        0
        Quote: Professor
        No need to reinvent the wheel, everything has already been invented.

        Do you want to create a separate site "Tsakhal - the best army in the world"? And here you have already got
        1. Zhenya
          Zhenya 28 August 2013 08: 19 New
          +9
          I do not agree, the professor does not say this!
          BUT!
          Provision of soldiers in the IDF army is one of the best in the world, everything for the soldier, everything for the survival of soldiers in battle.
          1. Ezhaak
            Ezhaak 28 August 2013 11: 41 New
            +1
            Quote: Marrying
            all for the soldier, all for the survival of fighters in battle.

            Yes, here is your truth. Judging by the publications, even on pro-Israeli websites, the IDF fighter and others will not enter the battlefield until they level it with artillery, missiles, aircraft and other means. And only after this the infantry will go to fight with the wounded, crippled, surviving old and old women. And then they will crucify, as on one famous site dedicated to the Israeli wars. Thousands of ATGM flew into our tanks. To go nuts. And not one hit!
            War on a distance is checked for a long time. And there is nothing new here.
        2. Professor
          Professor 28 August 2013 08: 20 New
          13
          Quote: yanus
          Do you want to create a separate site "Tsakhal - the best army in the world"? And here you have already got

          1. I never wrote anywhere that the IDF is the best army in the world.
          2. Such a site has already been done before me.
          3. If you get it, add it to the Blacklist and don’t whine anymore.
          4. I naively thought, thought that we are sharing our experience and studying the materiel ... I will make an exception, if the comment with photos gets a negative rating, then I delete it on ...
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 28 August 2013 08: 32 New
            +2
            Quote: Professor
            I naive thought, thought that we are sharing our experience and studying the materiel ...

            And now we know that judging by the second photo, the Israeli tanker's helmet is uncomfortable.

            However, like the helmet from "Armkom" - they also followed this path
            1. Professor
              Professor 28 August 2013 08: 52 New
              0
              Quote: Spade
              And now we know that judging by the second photo, the Israeli tanker's helmet is uncomfortable.

              Expand your conclusion. Which photo did you decide on? The tankers with whom I communicate never complained about the inconvenience of the helmet.

              Quote: Spade
              Something I do not observe it in any image of Israeli tankers. She is, but uncomfortable, and therefore do not wear it?

              Regarding the mask, wearing it is not necessary, but you can wear it in battle. All the photos I presented were taken naturally not in battle.
              1. Lopatov
                Lopatov 28 August 2013 09: 01 New
                +3
                Sorry, fourth photo. Children's centimeter optic forehead. To which, in addition, it is necessary to adjust for longer so that it falls between the edge of the helmet and eyebrows.

                The Armkom helmet is not suitable for our optics with normal headbands.
                1. Professor
                  Professor 28 August 2013 09: 16 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Spade
                  Children's centimeter optic forehead. To which, in addition, it is necessary to adjust for longer so that it falls between the edge of the helmet and eyebrows.

                  I realized I’ll ask the gunner Merkava about the convenience of such a device today.
                2. Pimply
                  Pimply 28 August 2013 12: 12 New
                  0
                  I had to wear this helmet when traveling on an armored personnel carrier (without fail it is worn by the car commander and driver. It’s quite comfortable, there is a soft headset inside, the main minus is the wired connection to the internal radio connection.
                3. Aleks tv
                  Aleks tv 28 August 2013 15: 07 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Spade
                  The Armkom helmet is not suitable for our optics with normal headbands.

                  So I have doubts about the use of such helmets as the cowboy and Arkom.
                  How to snuggle up to the forehead sights?
                  And the driving style on our tanks is practically impossible without tight contact of the forehead with the prism of observation.

                  Oh, to try, or hear those who used them.
          2. Woldemar
            Woldemar 28 August 2013 10: 00 New
            +1
            I read articles and often disagree with you, but in this case you're right. Leave a photo, a very correct example, let everyone look.
          3. Armata
            Armata 28 August 2013 10: 38 New
            +2
            Quote: Professor
            1. I never wrote anywhere that the IDF is the best army in the world.
            2. Such a site has already been done before me.
            3. If you get it, add it to the Blacklist and don’t whine anymore.
            4. I naively thought, thought that we are sharing our experience and studying the materiel ... I will make an exception, if the comment with photos gets a negative rating, then I delete it on ...
            Hi Oleg. Don’t pay attention. Too many whistles divorced on the site. Your opinion has always been appreciated (although we argue up to snot sometimes).
          4. Kirill
            Kirill 28 August 2013 11: 10 New
            +1
            I support too!
            We must learn from everyone!
          5. Yura
            Yura 28 August 2013 21: 37 New
            0
            Quote: Professor
            I naive thought, thought that we are sharing our experience and studying the materiel ...

            Thought correctly. Well, and what is naive, pretend that they believed, flirting? smile
        3. lewerlin53rus
          lewerlin53rus 28 August 2013 08: 23 New
          +1
          Well, why? positive experience needs to be adopted, whatever it is.
        4. fisherman
          fisherman 28 August 2013 08: 24 New
          0
          in Soviet times, in many military branches, fire brigades (on duty, for example, in Rav warehouses) had special gloves and masks (approximately, like hats with slots in modern specialists, only the material was different)

          Of course, they were NOT worn in everyday life, even if they had a stake in them :)
        5. Zhilan_kz
          Zhilan_kz 28 August 2013 08: 34 New
          +6
          The professor gives examples of how they have done, i.e. to Tsakhal. I think we need not to joke about this, but to compare what is better with us and what with them. And regarding the site "Tsakhal - the best army in the world" I would read it with pleasure. the Israel Army has a lot to learn.
        6. Mairos
          Mairos 28 August 2013 17: 34 New
          0
          Well, certainly one of the most combat-ready and having a solid combat experience. Strictly speaking, our experience is also not to occupy. I hope that the equipment and organizational issues will also be put in order.
      2. Lopatov
        Lopatov 28 August 2013 08: 26 New
        +1
        Quote: Professor
        No need to reinvent the wheel, everything has already been invented. There is a special mask.

        Something I do not observe it in any image of Israeli tankers. She is, but uncomfortable, and therefore do not wear it?
        1. Pimply
          Pimply 28 August 2013 12: 18 New
          +1
          I have never encountered this thing.
    2. Lopatov
      Lopatov 28 August 2013 08: 19 New
      0
      There are refractory balaclavas, there is an anti-splinter one made from the "Permyachka" composition. But will tankers wear them?
      1. fisherman
        fisherman 28 August 2013 08: 37 New
        0
        Will their tankers wear?


        in-in ...

        everything has been invented for a long time, I hope this does not sadden our Israeli colleagues :)

        Why am I talking about gloves and masks, because they talked about an open face and hands
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 28 August 2013 08: 49 New
          0
          This is where the fathers-commanders must work. Look, the British sailors have a standard protective kit - a fireproof balaclava and gloves with a long bell. White so that the commander can see that everyone is wearing it. When on their "Sheffield" Argentines rocket zhahnul, very much even helped.
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 28 August 2013 08: 52 New
            +1


            See from 0.45
          2. fisherman
            fisherman 28 August 2013 08: 54 New
            0
            have

            I don’t remember exactly, then the exoset didn’t seem to have worked, it just flew by a blank, and the thought with white is sensible of course
  8. Dmitry 2246
    Dmitry 2246 28 August 2013 08: 01 New
    0
    Thanks to the “Armocom” Center from all the mechanics-drivers and gunners of the operators for fire resistance and lightness.
    1. Apollo
      28 August 2013 08: 25 New
      +4
      about the center "Armocom", informative

      1. Dmitry 2246
        Dmitry 2246 28 August 2013 19: 42 New
        0
        It is very correct that the finished product does not glare, it was necessary to give a command to the helmets to rub with dirt.
        I liked the fixture of observation and aiming devices.
  9. mirag2
    mirag2 28 August 2013 08: 50 New
    0
    The device for evacuation is a hand winch with a pin, "cat" type.
  10. Egen
    Egen 28 August 2013 08: 55 New
    0
    Colleagues, please tell me a question - how is it convenient in a tank in practice? I am not a tanker, and in general I "went" a hundred years ago in the BRDM-2 and with the "baby", but there, I imagine, it will not be very convenient to turn around because of the tightness. On the contrary, we removed all unnecessary things. About the effectiveness of protection in the tank - I don't know, from the native BRDM in the event of a projectile hit, there is still not much left, and the RPG too ...
  11. Yankuz
    Yankuz 28 August 2013 09: 15 New
    +1
    Some kind of strange helmet - like "Our role is honorable and enviable!" from the cartoon about the Bremen Town Musicians.
    1. Pimply
      Pimply 28 August 2013 12: 20 New
      0
      Normal helmet. The main thing is a helmet, not a headset.
  12. Mercenary
    Mercenary 28 August 2013 09: 19 New
    +1
    the main thing is that this development of protection was not from YUDASHKIN.
    1. Zhenya
      Zhenya 28 August 2013 09: 28 New
      +2
      I’m writing to the 100th person, the uniform which is in the army has NO relation to Yudashkin.
  13. Zhenya
    Zhenya 28 August 2013 09: 33 New
    0
    I’m not sure that such masks are convenient in the tank.
  14. zadorin1974
    zadorin1974 28 August 2013 10: 09 New
    0
    The new kits will save the crews under three conditions: if they are accepted for service; if they are made according to the guest (and not so good) and if the tankers themselves wear them in full (heat-resistant comforters and gloves have been used in the army and navy for a long time they’re all beaten up for them - it’s not a secret to anyone that we don’t care a lot) Take the same Americans - if we get injured or injured, God forbid the fighter will not have any part of the amunyaga - all goodbye insurance, pension, etc. In vain for the Professor they didn’t do it — indeed, the IDF would learn a lot from us — first of all, how many fighters were they released for their prisoner? And during the fighting, their expired sprats in tomato and spirit bread are not consumed by their fighters.
  15. Woldemar
    Woldemar 28 August 2013 10: 12 New
    0
    in such a mask you suffocate
  16. sks1967sks
    sks1967sks 28 August 2013 12: 16 New
    +1
    in winter in this kit you can still hold on. in summer without air conditioning kirdyk. The Israelis in each tank have air conditioning. but with us I didn’t see air conditioners T72 and T80 without air conditioners
  17. Vtel
    Vtel 28 August 2013 13: 14 New
    0
    The set provides protection against exposure to an open flame for at least 25s.

    Is it a lot or a little? Question to the tankers.
    1. ICT
      ICT 28 August 2013 19: 18 New
      0
      I’m not a tanker (now I intersect a little with firefighters), I’ll say this even a lot, longer it’s a set of higher protection. (This time is just an open flame test, just a suit burned with a gas burner)
  18. The comment was deleted.