What is the reason for the unresolved main question left to us as a legacy of the Yeltsin liberal era? No, this question is not the privatization of Russia by oligarchs in 90-x. The main question is why, with the presence of such a demographic resource as 25 millions of not only Russian-speaking, but ethnically Russian compatriots, not to mention even compatriots - representatives of other indigenous peoples of Russia, a banal copy of the European strategy for replenishing population losses was chosen - poorly educated and alien to us culturally, mentally and religiously labor migrants?
The question is delicate, and therefore I will try to speculate on this topic without a doubt, not to mention the "good" and "bad" guys. Say at once: 25 millions - this is a very, very conditional figure. As well as tens of millions of illegal, semi-legal and just unread Central Asian migrants in our open spaces. In our digital, computer age, people, for some reason, have never learned to consider such a valuable resource. Moreover, out of the 25 of millions of Russians who remained totally according to the data of the last Soviet census of the 1989 of the year on the territory of the independent post-Soviet national republics, some have already managed to return to Russia with their own efforts after the 91-year. There is no exact data here either, I confess. About 9 million? More less? Nobody knows for sure.
Elegantly interethnic and politically correct disguised, but certainly an important benefit, designed to stimulate fertility in the Russian regions of the country: “From this year, in most regions of Russia, a new allowance has been introduced for 3 and subsequent children. Its size is not less than the subsistence minimum of the baby in the subject (from 5 to 13 thousand rubles, depending on the region). It will be paid before the onset of the 3 age of the baby. 50 regions, where the birth rate is lower than the average for Russia (and on average 1,7 is the number of children per woman), receive a grant from the federal budget to pay this benefit. Many regions that are prosperous in terms of fertility have also introduced such a benefit - at their own expense ... However, in the 18 regions (where everything is okay with the birth rate) there is no such benefit. These are the republics of Adygea, Altai, Buryatia, Dagestan, Ingushetia, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkess, Yakutia, North Ossetia, Tatarstan, Tyva, Chechnya. As well as the Krasnoyarsk Territory, Astrakhan Region, Moscow, Nenets, Chukotka and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Districts.
The case is good and important. Another good thing is to stop, forgive, the reduction of foreign adoption of Russian children.
And yet it’s all good. Because at least, all of the above is a manifestation of the interest of our state in solving demographic problems - once. And most importantly - in solving first of all the problems of the most unfavorable in this regard part of the population of Russia. The overwhelming part of it is a component of 80 with a percent tail.
Let's go further. If Russia is still interested in what we calculated indirectly, in increasing Russian and Russian cultural civilization close to the majority of the population and the same labor resources as well as draft, mobilization and other resources, then why are we year after year indifferently we observe how our initial huge resource of the Russian population, left as a suitcase without a handle, is rapidly diminishing on the platform of perestroika? Why do we, for decades already, not make any serious, meaningful efforts to return him to the homeland, which has become impoverished by people?
No, a lot of words have been said over the years. But we look at the numbers. At the exact, this time, numbers:
“- Are there general statistics, how many people have used this program for all the years of its implementation?
- K.Romodanovsky: We moved about 135 thousands order ”.
Statistical data on the ethnic composition of immigrants are not kept, but in the media one could meet the private opinions of various officials of the FMS or the Ministry of Regional Development, which indicate that the Russians and Slavs used the state resettlement program to use about 60 percent. The rest are representatives of the titular nations of the independent post-Soviet republics; by the way, we have already been reflecting on this topic quite recently. But these are those who returned to Russia precisely because of the state program to facilitate the voluntary resettlement of compatriots in Russia. As you know, on their own, at their own expense and at their own peril, more Russian people returned to the country by an order of magnitude, but there was no accounting at all, or simply no one provides reliable data. So, 135 thousand people. Of these, 60-70 percent are representatives of the Russian people or other indigenous peoples of the Russian Federation. "It will be enough"!
But it is good. Without the state program in general, many of our compatriots would have had one way out - in the loop, sorry for stating a sad post-Soviet reality. Plus, a gigantic apparatus has been created and worked out, actions for the resettlement of various ministries and departments have been coordinated - a matter of great importance and complexity for the largest country in the world. It’s a pity that even this meager streamlet actually stopped just when he had to, in the opinion of the authors of the new, indefinite state resettlement program, earn in full force. The current year is actually completely failed in terms of resettlement of compatriots. Let's wait and hope for the best.
But still, why for decades have we no longer been making all efforts to solve the most important problem - the reunification of the world's largest divided people - the Russian? Agree that this topic sounds more and more strong in society every year and is reflected in the media and in speeches and even decisions of senior government officials, but the result - 135 thousands - this is exactly the result of government efforts of the Russian Federation! The rest of the Russian repatriates did not actually receive any organized assistance from the state. But even out of these 135 “state” thousands of immigrants — a third are representatives of the title nations of other states. Moreover, here is fresh news: 21 June The State Duma adopted in the third, final, reading a bill aimed at facilitating the resettlement of compatriots from abroad. In accordance with the adopted amendments, participants in the program can obtain Russian citizenship in a simplified manner - without obtaining a residence permit, confirming the availability of a legal source of livelihood and checking the knowledge of the Russian language.
Now even it is not necessary to know the Russian language to the migrant, not to be Russian or Russian-cultural ... Once again the quote: “I instruct you to develop an accelerated procedure for granting Russian citizenship to our compatriots, native speakers of the Russian language and Russian culture” ... Let me remind you that this is from Putin’s instructions.
So why all the same in Russia do not need Russian? Why did the 135 of thousands of people return to Russia as a matter of state efforts, only some of whom, however large, are Russians and representatives of other indigenous peoples of the Russian Federation?
It seems to me that this is an ideological question. And this is not a reproach to the authorities, because our state ideology is banned constitutionally: Article 13
1. The Russian Federation recognizes ideological diversity.
2. No ideology can be established as a state or mandatory
And since we don’t have a state ideology, any ideological reproaches can’t be addressed to state authorities, right? So, there is an ideological question in this article, but there are no reproaches to power!
Why do we need mass resettlement of Russian compatriots of Russian origin, as well as representatives of other indigenous peoples of Russia? Let's remember who are these people? Who are the bulk of these 25 (?) By anyone not long ago recalculated millions? Of those who were abandoned by the new Russia. Thrown cynically and in a state of helplessness. If it was not about the state, then there is an article in the Criminal Code for such a crime, by the way. Do these people need representatives of the liberal, for example, part of our society? After all, our compatriots are mostly politically literate people. They all know and remember. They remember history our country, and what followed. They are well aware of the history of perestroika and who, when, whom he betrayed and what he sold. This is generally our compatriots' fad, in contrast to the rather apolitical Russians - 20 years these people (once I) had no choice but to study the details of their unwritten criminal case, in which all these millions act as victims.
These millions of potential Russian Russians are well aware, in their skin, that they are Russians! Even if they are Tatars or Jews, it doesn't matter! Russian compatriots (not emigrants, no), those who did not even think about giving up their homeland — Russia — they all know what Russophobia is and experience it for themselves with 20 for years. They all know what hatred is for Russia, whatever it is called - the Russian Empire, the USSR or the Russian Federation - from the states in which they are forced to stay ... All these millions of our Russian compatriots, that in the Baltic States, that in Central Asia, that in Ukraine, in the Caucasus, they are well aware of the true value of the “fraternal friendship of nations” and internationalism in the modern world.
Do we need all these millions of Russian compatriots to the Motherland, in the Constitution of which there are no indigenous peoples - neither Russian nor others? But still, the Russians of the Baltic States or Moldova know perfectly well the true price of “European values”, rights and freedoms, lifestyle, prices, health care and education systems, quality of products and working conditions, culture, imaginary political correctness and tolerance, up to juvenile justice and the impossibility Elementally do not agree to raise homosexuals from their children. They know the price of the “objectivity” of European advanced media and the cruelty of the banking credit system. They know the true value of fascism, Nazism, and our victory over them firsthand. Because Russophobia in Europe is tolerant, and protesting against the marches of the SS legions or the right to stolen citizenship, education, workplace or mother tongue is intolerant. They know what industry, ravaged by the old EU members, and the devastated agriculture of the new members are. They do not drool in Europe, as many good-natured Russians. They live in it! But they want to live in Russia. And most of all, unlike many Russians, they do not want Russia to become similar to the Europe in which they live now. You must agree that there is a slight contradiction in all this with some ideologies that still exist in Russia under the constitutional ban on ideology.
So who needs these millions of Russian people in Russia, deprived of European illusions? Socially active, culturally active, politically active. They are accustomed to work and demand too. Well, is it a labor and demographic resource compared to the millions of migrants from Central Asia, who also grew up in the post-Soviet era, with all the ensuing consequences?
But just about this, about the charms of Central Asia or the Caucasus, millions of Russian compatriots still left there will tell the Russians. If you come to live in Russia, of course. And about how they were loved fraternally during the civil wars. And about the way in which textbooks teach young people in fraternal Central Asian countries, what Russia and Russians are in these textbooks ... And what are the features of national corruption that are exported to Russia along with millions of migrant workers. And about the traditions of local ethnic crime, including the drug mafia, which applauds wide open to our borders and the complete lack of accounting and control. Again, some dissonance turns out, that's bad luck. It will be difficult, perhaps, to try to agitate Russians in the Russian media from the Baltic states for European values and the European way of life, and Russians from Central Asia for the benefits of labor migrants from Uzbekistan or Kyrgyzstan.
And the social and political activity of Russian compatriots for the most part is much higher than that of the majority of today's Russians. And most importantly, this activity is by no means liberal. Here such a scoundrel will come and ask something childish, from the side you know better ... For example, you say, dear Russians, that you can’t do without cheap, low-skilled labor from Central Asia? Do you know that in Russia only in various private security companies there are a million or more young, healthy, mostly with higher education, men? And they are stupidly looking at monitors or walking around with batons, forgetting about their education and normal work? And this is despite the fact that there are as many police officers in Russia as soldiers serve in the army. So explain why chopy if there is a police? Or vice versa? Why should there be a private security structure next to the police officer? Or one gets a salary and serves, or another. But someone is clearly superfluous. And he will ask, but where does the salary of private security services of the trading network come from? Yeah, from the mark-up on the goods. And the salary of the railway guard? Yeah, from the ticket fees! So it's robbery!
And many, many questions arise for every immigrant compatriot who has just arrived in Russia. Including the device of the state in all areas. There is something to compare with - for the better and for the worse. Indeed, very often, what we plan to introduce as advanced European experience has, in fact, long since failed with a bang in Europe. Or America, ”will add a compatriot of foreign countries who has returned to Russia ...
People who have lost their illusions are not needed by the sellers of illusions - this is the main problem of the repatriation of Russians, which has not begun.