Military Review

"Rat King" or how we eat each other

"Rat King" or how we eat each otherThe situation in Russia has been created by applying the technology known as the “rat king”. The task of this technology is to destroy key nodes, invisible foundations and clips of social construction. Create an atmosphere of fragmentation, when everyone is for himself and there is no “own” concept. To achieve this, you need to break the morality. An indicator of broken morality is behavior when one betrays one's own.

The essence of this technology is very clearly revealed by the example of rats. These animals are primarily known for their incredible survival. The basis of such vitality is social cohesion. Rats are incredibly social animals. Together they go "on business", help each other, protect, if possible, take the wounded with them. Rats feel like a single organism and behave as a single organism. They quickly exchange information, quickly warn about danger, transfer skills of protection. There is no individual benefit in such behavior. The defense mechanism has a moral nature.

One of the most effective ways to combat rats is based on the destruction of protection. Since protection has a basis for morality, the method is ultimately based on the destruction of morality. Everyone can not break morality. You can break a loner, and then not immediately. They break down gradually. For this, conditions are created where rational logic becomes crucial. The main thing is to force to make the first step - the action, which before that is under absolute taboo.

This is done as follows. They take a large and strong rat, they starve it for a long time, and then they throw a rat in the cage just to kill it. After some hesitation, she devours her dead fellow. Rational logic suggests: it is no longer a brother, it is food. He does not care, but I need to survive. Means, it is necessary to eat.

The second time the bar of immorality rises higher. A dead animal is thrown into the cage. The new "food" though almost dead, but still alive. Again, rational logic suggests a solution. He will die anyway, but I need to live. And the rat again eats his own, now practically alive.

For the third time in a cage they throw quite a living and healthy "food", a weak rat. A strong rat again turns on the rational logic algorithm. There is still nothing, she tells herself. What's the use if we both die? Let the strongest survive. And the strongest survive.

Note that the rat took less and less time to make a decision each time. At the same time, the level of immorality of every new devouring was increasing. After a while, the rat did not think at all. She treated her compatriots as food. No sooner had she been thrown into the cage by a new rat, she immediately attacked her and devoured her. From the moment when she did not think at all, whether to eat or not to eat, her morality was broken. Then it was released back into society, from where they were taken in due time. It was already not the rat. It was already a creature with no signs of morality. In its actions, it was guided only by the logic of selfishness. But others did not know this. They took it for their own and completely trusted.

Very quickly the creature, resembling a rat, came to the idea: why should we look for food somewhere, if it is round, warm and fresh. Rational logic determined the nature of the action. Carnivorous chose an unsuspecting victim and devoured her.

Very soon he came to the conclusion that the best option is not to openly attack and devour, but to do it secretly from society. The next time, under one pretext or another, this rat lured its victim to a secluded place and devoured it.

When the rat community had no doubt that a wolf in sheep's clothing was among them, rats left this place. And, left in a hundred cases out of a hundred. Animals seemed to be afraid of poisoning the fluids of the transformed rat. They were afraid to become the same. Instinctively felt: if their consciousness absorbs new attitudes, there will be a society without brakes, a society of traitors, a consumer society. The atmosphere of immorality will destroy the mechanism of social protection and all will die.

The question arises: why did the rat community leave, why could not the "king" be destroyed? In this behavior, too, has a profound meaning. Collective mind, which in this case can be considered an instinct, counted that the elimination will be attended by the strongest individuals, the elite of society. Who knows what will happen to them when they bite their teeth into the living flesh of an immoral fellow. Will not his infectiousness be infected?
Even rats do not want to live in a civil society built on constant war with each other, tearing the one into the plural. Rats are smarter than humans. Fairly fearing that the rational logic of egoism will catch the rat elite, they go elsewhere.

If we fantasize and imagine that society has not abandoned the immoral fellow, but has remained with him, it is easy to assume that he would infect the elite with his rational logic. Also, I would think of how to do this step-by-step and imperceptibly, in full accordance with the logic. Instead of one "rat king" would appear a whole cast of such "mutants". Without principles, they would quickly defeat the traditional elite. Then we would find a way to give the new order the status of justice and legality. If we completely let go of the reins of fantasy, logic leads us to the formation of a democratic society. The members of the new society would themselves choose those who will eat this very society.

The rat saves from such a transformation the absence of freedom in human understanding. The absence of such a powerful intelligence, as in humans. They are guided by instinct. Instinct determines the main value of society is not food and not even the life of an individual rat, but morality. This is the foundation on which any social structure is built. For the sake of its integrity, they leave from the source of infection. While preserving the foundation, the rats retain themselves as a single society with the traditional scale of values, ultimately remaining as a species.

Human society does not have such an instinct. But it is also based on morality. If you remove this foundation, the whole construction quickly turns into a mountain of garbage, which begins to rub yourself to the state of powder, that is, when there is nowhere else to be smaller. To rub into powder means to cut off the roots, traditions, way of life and, most importantly, to nullify the moral foundations. For society, the last stage of crushing is the moment when it turns into no more than unrelated individuals. There is an atomized society, human dust, building material for a new world order.

Do you want to get an image of the processes going on at the world level? Look at the table behind which you are sitting. There are different items from different materials. Each object is like a prototype of each people. Objects are original and not connectable. While they are intact, it is impossible to create something of them. But if all of them, and a ceramic ashtray, and plastic, and paper, grind into dust and mix, will get a homogeneous mass. Then this mushy mass - under the press, and pressure will create something fundamentally new. It can be anything, any configuration, the characteristics of which even hard to guess.

The destruction of human society is carried out according to the technology of the "rat king". The whole blow is concentrated on the destruction of morality. His notions are burned out in all ways.
The consumer society teaches: there are no ones in nature. All strangers, everything is potential food. The most optimal food is those who are nearby and consider themselves your loved ones. And he does not suspect that you really are a rat king. He believes, and you reap it.

Such "rat kings" are becoming more and more in modern society. These are the most terrible predators. They unite in groups, treating compatriots as cattle (food). Having discovered the "truth" that one can build one's happiness on someone else's misfortune, they first acted on the forehead - they "devoured" the people openly. Then they realized that the best option is to devour beautiful high words under the veil.

From the screens streamed streams of promises and high-flown words about freedom and equality. Initially, the "kings" were not going to fulfill the promised. For them it was only a means to lure "food". They were torn to key knots of a society that under a covering of beautiful words to guzzle the. Every year they gained strength, became stronger, more resourceful and dangerous. Their main danger is that they do not externally differ from healthy members of society. They have learned to camouflage themselves so that they look better than their honest fellows. But if you do not listen to words, but look at things, it's easy to see the essence of these creatures.

All the power of their mind and will is concentrated in a narrow selfish sector. They forgot how to think in terms of society and the state. They think only of themselves and their brood. They feed on their brethren in the same way as that rattle. They are many, they have incredibly bred, and their number continues to grow. They divided into small and large, breaking the country into hunting grounds, hunting and feeding places.

Small "rats", who are struggling in the criminal sector, reasoned - here lies a drunk, in his pocket money. Anyway, someone will take it. If so, why not me? And he took it slowly. Then he took it from the half-drunk. The explanation was different: he still drink, and I need money for the right things. And then he came to the idea: if everyone does not have enough money, everyone lives badly, then let the strongest survive. Then he looked for the victim, beat on the head and robbed. In the absence of morality, there is nothing to object to such logic.

In business, logic first led to the idea that a person can be fired, thrown out into the street. The course of thought is clear: if I do not throw it out, I'll burst, and eventually it will still be on the street. And I'm with him. If he is there anyway, let it be better without me. And fired.

The second stage: let it work, but you can not pay a salary. Otherwise I'll burst, and everyone will be on the street. And so the enterprise will remain. And conscious delayed payments began.

The third stage: for example, an entrepreneur consciously began to make products harmful to health. If I think about the fate of strangers, I’ll go broke. Let them think about themselves. For him, the confreres were nothing more than warm, live meat, which itself crawls in its mouth.

Politicians talked the same way. The first scrapping, eating a corpse, is a promise that it is unrealistic to fulfill it. Logic: if you do not promise with three boxes, you will not be chosen. Choose another, worse than you, who promises that his mouth will utter. Since in any case, society will be deceived, but in one case you will be among the fools, and in the second case among the elect, let there be a second option.

An analogue of the second stage of the breaking of morality, devouring a half-dead fellow, is the trade in places in its party. The logic is also clear, we need money for the elections. If you build yourself a "high school student", the money will take competitors. As a result, someone will take the money anyway, and in any case will be selected. Since it is inevitable, let it be better if I take it than someone.

The third stage, the devouring of a living and healthy fellow, is the lobbying of laws that are detrimental to society. The logic is the same. If you refuse to participate in the direct robbery of society, it will be robbed by others. The cannibalistic law will still be pushed, and if so, what difference does it make through whom it will be done? Better let through me.

Today, the political public sector is a bunch of "rats" of the last stage. They have nothing sacred, nothing personal, only business. And this process can not stop. He will improve, obeying rational logic.

Public officials, too, with the help of rational logic gradually broken morality. At first, many were shy when they were offered money. Soviet installations, that it is mean, still worked. Then they called the bribe in another word, which removed the reflex to the word “bribe”, and the process started. Nobody took the bribe now. Now "rolled away", "brought" and "sawed". These were no longer thieves, but respected members of society using the “window of opportunity”. The most terrible thing happened - by default and behind the scenes in the eyes of society it was legalized. A man could trade his honor. The society entrusted him with a general cash desk, and he distributed it to predators for a bribe. A decent woman would reject an offer for money to engage in sex. Consumer society officials selling public goods sank below the body trading women. She even trades her, and these strangers. In general, it was called the "business approach to life."

At a certain stage, they even went so far as to officially admit: they say that in the administrative sector there was a market with its own rules and prices. If so, why not legitimize it? Simply put, a proposal was made to legalize embezzlement and corruption, as well as prostitution. Like, everyone knows that it is! At that time, the legalization of all three vices was rejected, but the process of decomposition is underway, everything changes ... Practice shows: the phenomenon that has arisen, if it has roots in society and nothing can withstand it, one day it will be legalized. In the foreseeable future, if nothing prevents the ongoing processes, we will see what we cannot imagine today. Everything will be sold and bought. What cannot be sold will disappear. For example, conscience, because it evaporates at the time of sale. The first stage of breaking the morality of civil servants was offering a bribe in the form of gratitude for legal, but, for example, accelerated work. Then they offered to “eat half-dead”. This was expressed in the implementation of ambiguous orders. For example, to break through the budget of financing of any school, and to take a rollback from the allocated amount. The logic is the same - you refuse, another will agree. And here you will earn money yourself, and benefit for children. The third stage is “eating the living and healthy.” Under a specious excuse, it is proposed to steal, for example, money for the sick.

Outwardly, the scheme is, as a rule, very pious, the mosquito of the nose does not undermine. But knowledgeable people understood everything. And again the same logic - you will not take it, another will prompt. Better you won't do it to anyone, they will drank the budget, and you will remain a fool. “Rat kings”, having passed all the circles of logic, have been released into society. They understand their people as food. Meals they liked, and they themselves take the initiative. Appetites are growing, technology is improving, “rats” are grouped together, between which competition begins. To be understood, members of these groups do not consider accomplices for their own. There can be no such people there. These are partners that help each other devour their brethren. As soon as the partner weakened, he was immediately devoured by his former partners. No, not even the former. Devoured and devoured continue to be partners. I even began to cultivate a new morality, like, nothing to be offended at me, it is my fault that I relaxed, I just took advantage. Nothing personal, just business! New conditions generate new logic.

Partnership comes down to devouring the weak, whoever this weak one is, even though his brother. "Rats" remained lifelong partners, until his death. If a weakened partner, who had gathered to feast on his fellows, had a pretty bitten time to escape, he would begin to denounce the "rat kings", and carried the rubbish out of the hut. So he hoped to recover in the same place. Someone succeeded, and he was again taken "into the cage", as if nothing had happened. Well, think about it, you wanted to devour me, but I did not give up. Now we sit together and think about how to devour anyone, and we look one after another if the partner has not weakened or started eating. A constraining factor is the strength of the partner and his same willingness to devour you. The picture we have drawn is only a pale reflection of the current mores. As long as people take the words about liberty, happiness and equality as a coin, while they “work” with the electorate, go to elections or participate in the “orange” revolutions, they, without knowing it, create a system that produces “rat kings”. Some people today devour others. In the forehead or by deception, technology is secondary here. The main thing is direct cannibalism. Yes, those who are at the top, do not personally smear in blood. It is at the lower level of the "rats" that the direct robbery of the brethren goes.

At the top, indirect cannibalism occurs, which is also cannibalism. And on such a scale that the bottom and never dreamed of. The money received by the methods described above is the essence of another's grief, suffering, death. If the "rats" are shiny with fat, then someone has lost his life. It only seems that the weak separated only with wallets. No, these processes lead to the physical death of the weakest members of society. It is not difficult to verify this by looking at the dynamics of death and fertility.

Russia is dying under the rule of "rat kings". You cannot blame people for not linking corruption, corruption and unprincipledness with personal grief, personal problems. Too long cause-effect chain is obtained. Intuitively, they realize that they are being fooled, but that's where and how ... For that, an elite is needed in order for the strong to protect the weak. The situation needs to be urgently corrected by introducing a law on the responsibility of managers. There is no liability without punishment! And, of course, sifting administrative officials according to the presence of conscience and the human system of the psyche.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimir_61
    Vladimir_61 29 May 2013 15: 42
    "" For this, the elite is needed, so that the strong protect the weak. The situation needs to be urgently corrected by introducing a law on the responsibility of managers. There is no responsibility without a predetermined punishment! And, of course, sift the managers-officials according to the presence of conscience and the human structure of the psyche. ""

    Very intelligible. Plus article.
    1. S_mirnov
      S_mirnov 29 May 2013 17: 36
      "The situation needs to be urgently corrected by introducing a law on the responsibility of managers."
      so everything has already been invented, here it is this law,
      only it is kept in an information vacuum, because power this law as a sickle in a causal place.
      1. Yarosvet
        Yarosvet 29 May 2013 18: 44
        Quote: S_mirnov
        so everything has already been invented, here it is this law,
        only it is kept in an information vacuum, because power this law as a sickle in a causal place.

        And they’re not just keeping in a vacuum - they were banned, such as such demands are extremist.
        1. Sergh
          Sergh 29 May 2013 21: 55
          Quote: S_mirnov
          so everything has already been invented, here it is this law

          A "modest" agitator has turned up! Without soap in the well ... are you climbing? Your "comrade" Y. Mukhin with his law, this is a specific foreign misconception, a deprived extremist, his mother .... With Navalny and Nemtsov, he runs around Bolotny and splashes agitation about the overthrow of the government, where, together with "agents", he comes up with murky laws to cloud the brains of the people on any suitable basis. It is not without reason that it is spilled from everywhere, and its publications and its "party" are banned. In short, another vyperdysh to stir up the confusion and its law is complete, which invites the old woman to write her opinion report on the election to a particular party or leader, this is all to create a crowd and a queue in mass gatherings, where you can manipulate and to campaign, and just to lead the crowd to disorder.
          I have long understood your licking, quiet and unobtrusive agitation on this resource, with a periodic nod of your head, but slowly and stubbornly push your slush, without indicating the source!
          1. S_mirnov
            S_mirnov 30 May 2013 00: 43
            It would seem a simple law that everyone understands. And how scum burns, to blisters!
            1. Sergh
              Sergh 30 May 2013 04: 27
              Quote: S_mirnov
              It would seem a simple law that everyone understands. And how scum burns, to blisters!

              Hey, you, "partisan", put glasses on Kovpak, give him to read it, if you have forgotten the alphabet, you troublemaker. Some snot and tears on your marsh site, some "offenders" gathered, but of them not a single infection at the machine or on the combine did not work, in one word, get out! Nasr..l I’m on you, just don’t blame yourself a lot, like: "... everyone understands ...", your swamp plague, maybe understandable, but if your writer Y. Mukhin and in the tail and in the mane e ... t, it means for the cause, soon they will put you in line, pisun.
              1. S_mirnov
                S_mirnov 30 May 2013 09: 21
                Yes, very hot! laughing
    2. Sirocco
      Sirocco 29 May 2013 18: 32
      Quote: Vladimir_61
      And, of course, sift the managers-officials according to the presence of conscience and the human structure of the psyche. ""

      What kind of conscience do you speak with managers? No her. One chatter that has already sickened everyone. For example, they build a pig farm, installers sign in two sheets, 1. a sheet is 9 tyrov. 2. This is 20 tyrov. I think it’s not worth explaining why businessmen do this. BUT, why are silent, tax, and power. By the way, this complex is already running the drain, well, our Trojan businessmen are not used to paying nominally. The poor are all baked about themselves. And not about the people and the motherland.
    3. AlNikolaich
      AlNikolaich 29 May 2013 20: 47
      Quote: Vladimir_61
      "" For this, the elite is needed, so that the strong protect the weak. The situation needs to be urgently corrected by introducing a law on the responsibility of managers. There is no responsibility without a predetermined punishment! And, of course, sift the managers-officials according to the presence of conscience and the human structure of the psyche. ""

      There is no elite in Russia! Being an elite is a heavy burden and a huge responsibility! People are afraid, they are afraid of becoming an elite! But in the end, in the country bydocracy! And entities that are close to power and management cannot be allowed into the power structures! Under pain of death! And then they write here about the rat king ... The rat king (and, in fact, the rat wolf) is a predator!
      And parasites are joking in the country! Feel the difference...
      1. Vladimir_61
        Vladimir_61 29 May 2013 21: 42
        Quote: AlNikolaich
        Feel the difference...

        Dear, quote from the above article. If you think about the meaning, right: you need an elite that is not there right now. In general, I agree with you. Add: and predators are not uncommon
  2. JonnyT
    JonnyT 29 May 2013 16: 05
    An interesting approach of the author! I agree in many ways.
    The example of rats is certainly instructive, but still, thank God is still driven by reason, not instincts
    1. True
      True 29 May 2013 17: 01
      "Rational logic dictates: this is no longer a fellow, this is food. He does not care, but I need to survive. So, I have to eat."
    2. fisherman
      fisherman 29 May 2013 21: 33
      yes, it is reason :)

      in fact, this article is a short transcription of F.M.Dostevsky's novel - "" ...

      or a Biblical story about two brothers - Abel and Cain ...

      it is a civilization of the human mind ...
      1. fisherman
        fisherman 29 May 2013 21: 34
        get it, the name of the novel was stabbed :)

    3. Atlon
      Atlon 29 May 2013 21: 52
      Quote: JonnyT
      An interesting approach of the author! I agree in many ways.

      The author wrote everything correctly, and very interesting. I read about rat-catchers as a child, that's how the rat-catchers were taken out on ships. But at some point in the article, the author "skewed". Therefore, I did not put a plus or a minus. What is the essence of the bias ... Of course, officials and corruption are our sore subject. But to be completely honest, we need to raise the question of the morality of society as a whole! Well, our society is not divided into rats of officials, and an electorate in white clothes. There's no such thing! Otherwise, I agree. As for morality, this should be done at the level of the family, education from an early age. All officials came from the people. The position of an official does not imply an instant loss of morality. It is acquired.
      1. yak69
        yak69 30 May 2013 12: 48
        Quote: Atlon
        All officials came out of the people.

        Here, I agree. We offer and give bribes, ordinary citizens of Russia. Someone on the road (for traffic violations), someone in the offices (for all kinds of relief, acceleration, etc.). And if we assume a situation where citizens do not give bribes and insistently and consistently demand that the official comply with the Law (even if they know in advance that the official can refuse, tarnish, etc.) and EVERY citizen does that, then there will simply be no corruption as a phenomenon . And corruption is not only a bribe to an official. I would attribute to this phenomenon all unrighteous social and social acts:
        - the meat was not reported to the meatballs;
        -Manufacturer on ingredients saved;
        - the seller issued an expired product for fresh, hung out;
        -the teacher formally teaches children;
        - a doctor formally treats people;
        - the locksmith did not tighten the nut or did the job poorly;
        - the yard janitor didn’t get home, etc. etc.
        Look around you, WE are citizens of the Russian Federation and we are creating that breeding ground for bribe-takers and embezzlers. Responsibility for all of us, as for society as a whole. Somewhere "greased", somewhere "closed his eyes" to the violation, somewhere he stole.
        Therefore, the words about
        Quote: Atlon
        morality, you need to do this at the family level, education from an early age.

        this is precisely the very foundation opposing any destructive influences.
        The author and article are a big plus!
        The really existing technology of Western special services is described simply and clearly - I fully confirm.
        1. Atlon
          Atlon 30 May 2013 13: 54
          Quote: yak69
          Here, I agree. We offer and give bribes, ordinary citizens of Russia.

          Finally! I thought I couldn't wait for an adequate assessment of the situation! How many minuses have picked up, trying to hammer the same into "truth-tellers". Everyone is shouting "corruption!", And they themselves are slowly "buying" preferences for themselves in order to bypass the "competitor." Whether in business or in everyday life. And here, as with the author: Well, I will not give, he will give another. And I'll stay with my nose! So let me be better! That's how we live ... We feed the dragon ourselves, and we ourselves shout how "bloodthirsty" he is.
          1. yak69
            yak69 30 May 2013 21: 32
            Quote: Atlon
            How many minuses have picked up, trying to hammer the same into "truth-tellers".

            Are you afraid of cons? You have a margin of safety, what a whole army general laughing

  3. Sergey_K
    Sergey_K 29 May 2013 16: 06
    “You can't blame people for not being able to connect corruption, corruption and unprincipledness with personal grief, personal problems. The chain of cause and effect is too long. They intuitively guess that they are being fooled, but here's where and how ... elite, so that the strong protect the weak. The situation needs to be urgently corrected by introducing a law on the responsibility of managers. There is no responsibility without a predetermined punishment! And, of course, to sift the managers-officials according to the presence of conscience and the human psyche. "
    - You can blame and need. Corruption is the root of all evil, absolutely any good undertaking is corrupted and leveled.
    - Three stages, this is not a long chain. No need to keep people for sheep, everyone has long known and sees everything. But two principles work here. The first is that if I get there, I will also grab my piece. Second - do not touch me, but I do not touch you.
    - And what kind of measure of conscience is this? Or will we measure the diameter of the skull? "liability law ..." is a utopia. There are laws about theft, etc., they are quite enough.

    Society is hurt after the collapse of the USSR, but it either cleans itself or dies. Nobody wants to die - most likely self-cleaning.
    1. Atlon
      Atlon 29 May 2013 22: 24
      Quote: Sergey_K
      Nobody wants to die - most likely self-cleaning.

      Doesn't want to ... But everyone thinks: "I suppose it will carry me!". And about self-purification - utopia ... Corruption exists as long as there is a SOCIETY itself. This is a public manifestation, and it will not go anywhere. You can only reduce the level to an acceptable level, and nothing more.
  4. pamero
    pamero 29 May 2013 16: 13
    everything is pretty clear. article is correct.
  5. IRBIS
    IRBIS 29 May 2013 16: 14
    Author - "+"! The only pity is that he chose rats to cover the problem. I felt hurt for the rat that lives with me - my rat is the smartest and most grateful animal, unlike the people who were associated with it.
    1. screw cutter
      screw cutter 29 May 2013 17: 49
      "The more I communicate with dogs, the less desire to communicate with people."
    2. builder
      builder 29 May 2013 19: 43
      It's all about education or training wink
    3. 3 inches.
      3 inches. 30 May 2013 12: 02
      You don’t have it in the pack. Yes, and there is no need to take care of food.
  6. Lech from ZATULINKI
    Lech from ZATULINKI 29 May 2013 16: 15

    Juvenile justice, various sects, financial swindlers of all stripes, various perverts of various kinds - all this gadushnik from the PANDORA box opened during perestroika creeps into our society. I think this is not all the charms of the DEMOCRATIC WORLD and we all will have to find ways to fight and confront THIS THREATS about which before Perestroika we had no idea.
    I believe that our PEOPLE will be able to survive in this struggle for survival - it shows ALL OUR HISTORY OF OUR Fathers and Grandfathers.
    1. fisherman
      fisherman 29 May 2013 21: 41
      just don't think that I want to confuse or scare you, but this "Pandora's box" was opened long before us ...

      novel by F.M. Dostoevsky "And ..."

      Abel and Cain ...

      or for example:

      ““ And all this newborn horde of people, instantly ascended to an unattainable height, millions of times greater than the sizes of desires available to her understanding, never thinking about anything “social”, morally devastated in relation to the recent past, mentally devastated in relation to the future ... - alas, I could not invent anything either in terms of breadth of scope, or in terms of whimsicality, or even less in terms of grace ... "Buy!" - this is what she brought into society. Buy someone else's wife, buy a ballet dancer (there was a case that a St. Petersburg merchant bought half a ballet dancer, since she was already half bought), buy the bosses, buy electors - in a word, nothing but buy them. " presence forces normal people, that is, “people with great moral requirements, to reduce these requirements to a minimum,” because “now is not the time for the manifestation of your highly educated thoughts and goals related to these thoughts ... great knowledge and great moral and even, generally speaking, neat human relations can and should even be postponed until another time ... until this pressure of the deathly burden of life ends. ”For that early Russian bourgeois spread“ in a living human society the smell of a cold corpse ”(essay“ Bourgeois ”).

      A marvelous portrait and how well preserved! Like this is a modern photo. And how subtly the oppression was noticed, which was experienced by the surrounding people, completely independent of the concrete “bourgeois”, but only because of its mere presence.

      The cult of money is ugly in itself; it is a permanent generator of crime at all levels, beginning with adolescence. Money deadens everything around itself, for the way of professing this faith and worship is universal corruption.

      "flying from one century to another ..."
  7. Hellriker
    Hellriker 29 May 2013 16: 24
    Strong! The article made me think a lot, because I had never suspected that everything was so bad.
  8. sergo0000
    sergo0000 29 May 2013 16: 29
    Great article! Bravo maestro! +++ Everything on the shelves from the world of animals, which as more and more convinced better and more moral people! good
    1. fisherman
      fisherman 29 May 2013 21: 42
      Woe from the mind (Griboedov) ... The fruits of enlightenment (Tolstoy) ... (Dostoevsky)

      -I will one day wake up, and around - a different world:

      I will wake up one day, and the world around is different:
      Bright, pure, infinitely beautiful
      And on a high throne - Queen Love,
      And for less I do not agree.

      Under the crystal bridge - rivers of clear water
      And no one has power over flowers
      And not a tree of happiness, but happiness gardens,
      And for less I do not agree.

      Will be a great friend for animals and birds
      Champion of ancient Greek fables,
      And there will be no trace of embittered faces,
      And for less I do not agree.

      He still believes in silly dreams.
      Sorry, I'm not involved in these dreams.
      They have to go, I have to go and you also go,
      And for less I do not agree. (G. L.)
  9. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 29 May 2013 16: 32
    The article is scary, but relevant and instructive. Rats cannot rule the world!
  10. Net
    Net 29 May 2013 16: 36
    Unlike rats, we have nowhere to go, so the "kings" will have to be bitten.
    1. fisherman
      fisherman 29 May 2013 21: 44
      feature film - "Kill the Dragon"

      this is if you want to see what happens in the end ...
  11. omsbon
    omsbon 29 May 2013 16: 47
    I liked the article very much! (+++)
    Great comparison with rats. I remembered the crooked face of Gozman, as if there was something rat in him.
  12. matross
    matross 29 May 2013 16: 47
    The article is a definite plus. A view of the moral health of society, which, by the way, we rarely seriously discuss, from an interesting angle and very imaginative. But the recipe in the resume is weak - "pass the law".
    And one more consideration - weren't there always "rats", in all human societies? Only more or less. And when less - then why. Maybe there are recipes for "persecuting rodents" to look for and adopt. The main thing is not to be late, otherwise the planet is small - there is nowhere to run - you will have to sacrifice your principles (the principles of "normal rats") and devour their own kind, who consider themselves kings!
    1. screw cutter
      screw cutter 29 May 2013 17: 54
      It seems to me that there is such a recipe, it’s only harsh, and surviving rats still water the author with slop.
    2. fisherman
      fisherman 29 May 2013 21: 47
      the right question, were, more precisely, it always was, because this is the essence of the human civilization of the mind ...

      I gave examples a little higher ...
      1. taynik
        taynik 30 May 2013 17: 12
        The theory is correct, 100% is applicable to rats, only Zausha is somehow crookedly drawn to humans. I can’t understand where, but not everything fits together. Therefore, it smacks of propaganda.
        The recipe for humans here is simple: if you adhere to the theory of the author and want to purify, then you must gobble up the producer of rat kings, and then only the kings themselves. But I'm afraid we can not reach the manufacturer. And the main producer (puppeteer) is not one person, but a bunch of people, and a secret bunch. Who are you guess yourself.
        And the article in the criminal code should be one and short, understandable to all without further explanation and comments from Skuratov. I suggest this: for cunning - shooting! all!
  13. Vtel
    Vtel 29 May 2013 16: 55
    Rightly fearing that the rat elite will become infected with the rational logic of egoism, they go to another place.

    We Russians will not go anywhere - we are at home, but our "rat elite", a little smelled, sho they want to "eat" - that is to say, put them in a "flower bed", then they immediately "leave", who to their original homeland in Israel , and who in the hotbed of dermocracy - Aglia - London. An article to the point - about our liberal elite - +!
    1. fisherman
      fisherman 29 May 2013 21: 48
      "the way of life shakes - they bury God" (B. Pasternak)

      "neoliberalism is another re-edition of Bolshevism" (J. Stiglitz)
  14. Kolyan
    Kolyan 29 May 2013 17: 07
    There is such a dock. film "The Rat King".
  15. Orik
    Orik 29 May 2013 17: 13
    The article is good, but I would not blame only the "elite". You see such examples at the level of ordinary fellow citizens. The virus of selfishness is terrible in itself, regardless of whether you are a king or a plowman. They eat at work, in their personal life for a warm place, for a prize, out of envy. What am I talking about? Oh, yes, about SOCIETY, he who reveres and understands ...
  16. Begemot
    Begemot 29 May 2013 17: 46
    Article plus. Everything is just like that. Especially about lobbying cannibalistic laws. Touching with our legislation I am always surprised to what extent our deputies hate their people. Yes, they do not hide, remember the blog of MP Isaev on the publication of MK on prostitution in the State Duma.
  17. Apollo
    Apollo 29 May 2013 17: 48
    After reading the article, first of all, I was interested in why the author chose the rat as an image. I think this is not accidental.

    1. Each person associates himself with any of the animals, I immediately want to make a reservation in a good understanding. The animal world and the human environment are closely interconnected with each other. Hence the frequent use of Mother nature.
    2. In my understanding, a rat is a very vile animal and, what is most surprising, adapts itself to everything. Throughout the history of mankind, rats not only did not die out, they even adapted and mutate.
    3.If our gluttonous officials are taken into account, they just remind me of rats, all of them are few, give me more.
    4. Rats reproduce quickly in terms of speed comparable with the number of officials. The number does not decrease, on the contrary, increases every year.
    5. What is the use of rats is the same use of officials. Both of these pests.
    6.And finally I will post the info for those who are interested
    Rats move their eyes in opposite directions

    The discovery belongs to scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics Institute of Biological Cybernetics. Using a miniature high-speed camera, the researchers tracked the behavior of experimental rats and revealed an interesting feature: during movement, these animals move their eyes in opposite directions, both horizontal and vertical. Each eye moves in the opposite direction to the rodent’s head ..........

    “People move their eyes in the same direction that their head moves. Both of our eyes always look in the same direction and follow the same object. Rat eyes almost always look in different directions ", Says lead author of the study, Jason Kerr.

    Well, just like officials laughing
  18. Umnichka
    Umnichka 29 May 2013 18: 05
    Better and easier to meet. A huge plus. Again, the only question is who? Need a very strong moral personality. I used to denounce Stalin according to fragmentary ones (specially edited and filtered by Khrushchevism and not perceiving the dangers of Brezhnevschina - sorry for the slang, so shorter), now I’ll go to church to pray to the Lord to give us such a Person, it’s only written that I would ask the elite in full ! In terms of danger, I would like people to understand - the situation is absolutely no less dangerous than the war against Nazism. Just Nazism - their advanced detachment, did not work in the forehead from the outside ... Now they climbed from the inside. I can’t quickly find a synonym - I want to burn Gorbachev and Yeltsin in fiery hell. I really hope that we confine ourselves to these two ...
  19. fisherman
    fisherman 29 May 2013 18: 35
    We were given freedom, only we understood it in FREEDOM OF TRADE, then Freedom IN TRAFFICKING IN TRADE, because it’s easier to make money ... morality dies, then culture dies ... Consumer culture, communication culture, perception of the beautiful ... (once, we make money) ... then there’s only one thing -lower intelligence, each for himself and ... .. the complete decomposition of society ...
    1. fisherman
      fisherman 29 May 2013 21: 55
      increase in intelligence, to a cynical size ...
  20. Yarosvet
    Yarosvet 29 May 2013 19: 31
    The article is absolutely correct, but I want to add a couple of points:

    1 The described system has always been characteristic of organized crime - now in the country's politics, in essence, it’s not parties, influence groups and clans that operate, but legitimized organized crime groups.

    2 Described in the article in the form of a mass phenomenon is possible only when there is no real direct threat from the outside, that is, when the "rats" have agreed with a potential adversary and there is no need to fear an open attack from the outside.
  21. Sirius-2
    Sirius-2 29 May 2013 19: 34
    Interesting article. There is something to think about. A law on the responsibility of officials alone will not solve the problem. All of humanity is now infected with the "rat king" virus. People, unlike rats, cannot leave the territory. But in terms of intellect, a person is still more complicated than rats, which means he can find another solution to the problem. Here a whole ideology is needed as immunity. But this is my personal opinion.
  22. knn54
    knn54 29 May 2013 19: 34
    The article is very strong, without reservations.
    -Orik: After all, you see similar examples at the level of ordinary fellow citizens.
    The worldwide practice of withdrawing moral principles and, first of all, compassion. TODAY, even a person with a conscience can completely lose it over time if he realizes that he is not risking anything by eating his own kind. It should be done as in Georgia, where a bribe-taker risks not only ending up in prison for a long time, but also losing ALL of his property, which is WHOLEly entered in the "Unified Property Register".
    After all, even rats do not want to live in a society where there is a constant war with each other. "The Rat King" is a road to nowhere.
    We still have a chance. Duty, honor, homeland, friendship, love, the ability to sacrifice, and much more that so far distinguishes us from rats.
  23. dddym
    dddym 29 May 2013 20: 08
    Bravo to the author! Ingenious! The author of the article itself approved and proved that the irrational is higher than rationalism. Razio - regressively in the essence itself, for any ratio strives for entropy. For in the beginning was the word and the word was not irrational! Let's be irrational - let's resist ration. First in the heart and then in society. A huge plus article!
    1. dddym
      dddym 29 May 2013 21: 01
      Well, the first rats with minuses appeared - well, you dust-dust!
  24. poquello
    poquello 29 May 2013 20: 26
    ". The situation needs to be urgently corrected by introducing a law on the responsibility of managers. There is no responsibility without a predetermined punishment!"

    I agree with this, the rest is far-fetched. Everything is much more complicated.
  25. Tverichanka
    Tverichanka 29 May 2013 20: 37
    It is interesting how the author works. It means that the whole mass of rats does not "get infected", they just leave. And if they kill the "rat king", they will become like him. The question is what we need to leave our land in order to not to be "infected" from rats? I strongly disagree! Dost, dust should be sprinkled on them all, and not space for life to be freed. And yet it is not correct to draw parallels between people and rats. Yesterday was on the channel "Russia" in the program "Spets.cor." 12 outposts in Tajikistan. Yes, there is no price for such men as they are! And why should they give in to the rats? Well, duds!
  26. PValery53
    PValery53 29 May 2013 20: 40
    Amazingly accurate parallels between rats and criminal officials! The adoption of the new Law is unlikely to break this vicious circle. But truly the People’s Court will gradually straighten things for the better. After all, nowadays mass messages about rotten officials are coming and going, and there’s almost no reaction to this! They invite the people themselves to deal with villains?! .. Not otherwise!
  27. dddym
    dddym 29 May 2013 20: 45
    We are not rats, but society is similar - we have nowhere to go, which means you are right - dust! The author is right in the metaphor! The metaphor of an ordinary walkie-talkie is not measured.
  28. Semurg
    Semurg 29 May 2013 21: 15
    Probably there is no need to compare the deputy corps, officials, political parties with rats and turn them into rat kings. This article is interesting but causes the reader nigelism in relation to officials, parties and deputies, but these are all structures of the state and therefore nigelism to the state. it sounds like a call to change all officials, deputies, etc., it’s good if we have no blood like rats, but we don’t have any sharp changes without blood. I think we need to step by step change the rules of political and state life without sudden movements.
  29. Andrey_K
    Andrey_K 29 May 2013 21: 23
    Means to divide people have long been introduced, especially the courts.
    Yes, the courts.
    Remember the classics: "how Ivan Nikiforovich fell out with Ivan Ivanovich."
    Gogol clearly described how a person degrades when he has the opportunity to sue his neighbor.
    Were the best friends - became the worst enemies.
    Anyone who has ever sued his neighbors will understand how this happens.
    He will never make peace with his neighbor, and he will also harbor anger at the state.
    The fact that some kind of stranger (possibly dishonest or stupid or evil) - the judge decides your fate, and you can not do anything about it - this is one of the sources of destruction of society.
    Russia did not fall apart under the blows of the Bolsheviks — even earlier it had been undermined by its judicial system, introduced from the West.
    In this system, the peasant did not shine against the rich man - this then gave rise to class hatred ... well, at least he contributed his part to its formation.

    It is necessary to cancel all civil courts, and all possible damage from the fact that someone did something to someone should be assigned to insurance organizations.
    In Soviet times, the courts were more humane, therefore, relations between people were kinder.
  30. Mite27
    Mite27 29 May 2013 21: 57
    Our society lives according to the camp-thieves, without even realizing it.
  31. Per se.
    Per se. 29 May 2013 22: 15
    Rats have where to go, but we can only get away from this gangster capitalism, which has no worthy future due to its initial immorality. The death of the Soviet Union is a loss for our entire civilization, which, based on the "values" of consumerism, selfishness and lack of spirituality, is increasingly beginning to turn into Sodom and Gomorrah.
  32. reichsmarshal
    reichsmarshal 29 May 2013 23: 36
    Article minus. We had a society based on Orthodoxy, then there was a society based on communism - and where are they? They collapsed. And not because someone wanted this (even 3 weeks before the October Revolution, almost no one in the country knew about the Bolsheviks), but because the system "based on conscience" (according to the author's logic) was not needed by anyone. The same thing happened in 1991 - no one was "for" the collapse of the Union ... but who rushed to defend it with arms in hand?
    Conclusion: we must build a state based on forceful interaction: arm all the people to the teeth, give EVERYONE an opportunity to kill for their own sake and their ideals. If half as a result of the outbreak of civil war, this cannot be avoided anyway! From time to time, the tree of freedom needs to be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots (M. Robespierre). But after 50-70 years of chaos, we (or rather, our grandchildren) will receive such a state, which will suit not 30-40% or even 60-70%, but 99,9% of the population. Such a state will indeed be an EMPIRE on a solid foundation and will be able to declare itself, causing not laughter or fear, but genuine respect.
  33. konvalval
    konvalval 29 May 2013 23: 55
    An interesting analogy. In many ways the author is right, but not in everything.
  34. Atlon
    Atlon 30 May 2013 00: 00
    Quote: reichsmarshal
    They collapsed. And not because someone wanted it

    EXACTLY wanted. World Zionism.

    Quote: reichsmarshal
    The same thing happened in 1991 - no one was in favor of the collapse of the Union.

    Were for. Again, Zionism with the Naglosaks.

    Quote: reichsmarshal
    Conclusion: we must build a state based on forceful interaction: arm all the people to the teeth, give EVERYONE an opportunity to kill for their own sake and their ideals. If half as a result of the outbreak of civil war, this cannot be avoided anyway!

    And it was. USA is an example. So what?

    Quote: reichsmarshal
    From time to time, the tree of freedom needs to be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots (M. Robespierre).

    He was poured with his blood, then a tree ... Have you heard of the superpower France? Me not...

    Quote: reichsmarshal
    But after 50-70 years of chaos, we (or rather, our grandchildren) will receive such a state that will suit not 30-40% or even 60-70%, but 99,9% of the population

    More precisely, there will NOT be any of your grandchildren!

    Quote: reichsmarshal
    Such a state will indeed be an EMPIRE on a solid foundation and will be able to declare itself, causing not laughter or fear, but genuine respect.

    Again. There is such a state, USA. And what does it cause?
    1. reichsmarshal
      reichsmarshal 30 May 2013 22: 31
      Zionism with the Naglosaks

      Aha, aha, and also mutant aliens from the hellish dimension XYZ! Anti-state activity leads to the downfall of only that state, which was initially devoid of internal strength! The conspiracy theory against Russia is like blaming bacteria for getting dysentery. But common sense dictates that you also need to wash your hands before eating!
      And it was. USA is an example. So what?

      And the fact that the United States, no matter how we hate them (I note, rightly), is such a state that normal people want. Everyone goes to the USA, and not to Russia.
      Have you heard of France superpower? Me not...

      very sad. Napoleon, apparently, did not impress you. Forgive me that I am not impressed by the Suvorov-Kutuzovs with their serfdom, which they defended. In general, the term "superpower" refers to the 20th century. But France, a republic-empire, was quite suitable for this term.
      More precisely, there will NOT be any of your grandchildren!

      Our grandchildren will definitely not be in the current state.
      And what does it cause?

      Respect for people who value strength and freedom. And those who shed crocodile tears over "Russia We Lost" hardly have any value at all for their respect: it is they who bear much more responsibility for "pros ... livesepolymers"
  35. Kolyan
    Kolyan 30 May 2013 05: 35
    "Rat King" or how we eat each other

    That's for sure. Instead of smashing half of Moscow after an unfair sentence to Agafonov’s murderer ...
    Some even say that he doesn’t care - Agafonov de was an attacker and it’s good that he was killed. Underpants.
  36. svskor80
    svskor80 30 May 2013 05: 45
    The question is what to do? We cannot get up and leave everyone (like rats). The severity of punishment should be increased, the death penalty and confiscation of all property of a corrupt official should be introduced. But this should not be done selectively, but for everyone.
  37. dmb
    dmb 30 May 2013 10: 04
    The allegory is not bad, but lately there are more and more articles that blame only officials for all the troubles of our Motherland. They are certainly not a gift, but is it really better for a teacher who evaluates a student based on the amount of gratitude or a doctor who prescribes an expensive medicine and indicates that pharmacy with which he has a good relationship? In my opinion, it is worse. For it is they who lay the foundations of morality. I'm not even talking about the support of the Patronymic - businessmen. It is not a sin to interrupt the expiration dates of the goods, not to pay taxes, to save on the fire alarm. Here is an official who discovered a mess and took a bribe for it instead of a well-deserved punishment, this bastard to the nail, and a businessman he suffers from these evil things for his homeland. I would also like to remind you that at the present time the children of these very businessmen are in the overwhelming majority of officials (especially in something decisive). And not because they are smarter and more capable of management, but because the popes thus protect their capital, acquired "in an exclusively righteous way." Well, again, it is necessary to "recapture" the grandmother spent on the education of the dear child and his placement in a grain position.
    1. dddym
      dddym 30 May 2013 10: 21
      The teacher is the same bad if he requires money, but who created this situation? Teacher or what? Businessman gives a bribe. Is he that good? The giver and the bro are both to blame! And equally! Both the teacher is a bribe taker and the businessman is a feeder. And the system itself, created today - cannot be honest by definition - the system needs to be changed, because power must be popular and not purchased. And now we have a domineering menu in a political cafe.
      1. fisherman
        fisherman 30 May 2013 11: 32
        in Ukraine they exchanged Kuchma for Yushchenko, then Yushchenko for Yanukovych ...

        nothing has changed at all ...

        they naive also thought that the SYSTEM is the top, but it turned out ...
  38. Nayhas
    Nayhas 30 May 2013 10: 39
    Strong, very. But the author forgot to mention the countries in which there are practically no rat kings in power, because there officials (potential rat kings) are controlled by society, the change of power does not allow rat kings to poison the environment, because it makes no sense to become a rat king if you can be expelled. But here we have become a rat king (everyone notes this resemblance to a rat), you can not be afraid for your future, the community of rat kings don’t eat each other (see Serdyukov), for this there are ordinary individuals ... But the rat king taught history poorly ...
  39. SAVA555.IVANOV
    SAVA555.IVANOV 30 May 2013 11: 51
    An article about "garbage" who devour their fellows by slipping and encouraging drugs, any "authorities", indulging certain nations, pulling them into corruption schemes and making the life of their fellows unbearable and hopeless.
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. Grbear
    Grbear 30 May 2013 11: 56
    Allegory, as a literary device, is very effective. But this is just a statement of the problem. Solutions that are acceptable to society have been around for a long time. One of them is the expulsion from society of a person who professes alien principles (democracy has nothing to do with it - this is sanitation). Another is the material responsibility of a person in power. The criterion for the activity of a statesman is changes in the area of ​​life he supervises. With a negative balance - dismissal and check of financial position "up to the seventh generation". The third is the defense of the institution of the family.

    Control over the state of affairs in society in a specific territory is, as it were, entrusted to the deputies, and therefore, whoever was elected, "he has you."

    In life, of course, everything is much more complicated, but there must be unshakable points of support, otherwise - "good intentions" and "castles in the air."