"Rat King" or how we eat each other
The situation in Russia has been created by applying the technology known as the “rat king”. The task of this technology is to destroy key nodes, invisible foundations and clips of social construction. Create an atmosphere of fragmentation, when everyone is for himself and there is no “own” concept. To achieve this, you need to break the morality. An indicator of broken morality is behavior when one betrays one's own.The essence of this technology is very clearly revealed by the example of rats. These animals are primarily known for their incredible survival. The basis of such vitality is social cohesion. Rats are incredibly social animals. Together they go "on business", help each other, protect, if possible, take the wounded with them. Rats feel like a single organism and behave as a single organism. They quickly exchange information, quickly warn about danger, transfer skills of protection. There is no individual benefit in such behavior. The defense mechanism has a moral nature.
One of the most effective ways to combat rats is based on the destruction of protection. Since protection has a basis for morality, the method is ultimately based on the destruction of morality. Everyone can not break morality. You can break a loner, and then not immediately. They break down gradually. For this, conditions are created where rational logic becomes crucial. The main thing is to force to make the first step - the action, which before that is under absolute taboo.
This is done as follows. They take a large and strong rat, they starve it for a long time, and then they throw a rat in the cage just to kill it. After some hesitation, she devours her dead fellow. Rational logic suggests: it is no longer a brother, it is food. He does not care, but I need to survive. Means, it is necessary to eat.
The second time the bar of immorality rises higher. A dead animal is thrown into the cage. The new "food" though almost dead, but still alive. Again, rational logic suggests a solution. He will die anyway, but I need to live. And the rat again eats his own, now practically alive.
For the third time in a cage they throw quite a living and healthy "food", a weak rat. A strong rat again turns on the rational logic algorithm. There is still nothing, she tells herself. What's the use if we both die? Let the strongest survive. And the strongest survive.
Note that the rat took less and less time to make a decision each time. At the same time, the level of immorality of every new devouring was increasing. After a while, the rat did not think at all. She treated her compatriots as food. No sooner had she been thrown into the cage by a new rat, she immediately attacked her and devoured her. From the moment when she did not think at all, whether to eat or not to eat, her morality was broken. Then it was released back into society, from where they were taken in due time. It was already not the rat. It was already a creature with no signs of morality. In its actions, it was guided only by the logic of selfishness. But others did not know this. They took it for their own and completely trusted.
Very quickly the creature, resembling a rat, came to the idea: why should we look for food somewhere, if it is round, warm and fresh. Rational logic determined the nature of the action. Carnivorous chose an unsuspecting victim and devoured her.
Very soon he came to the conclusion that the best option is not to openly attack and devour, but to do it secretly from society. The next time, under one pretext or another, this rat lured its victim to a secluded place and devoured it.
When the rat community had no doubt that a wolf in sheep's clothing was among them, rats left this place. And, left in a hundred cases out of a hundred. Animals seemed to be afraid of poisoning the fluids of the transformed rat. They were afraid to become the same. Instinctively felt: if their consciousness absorbs new attitudes, there will be a society without brakes, a society of traitors, a consumer society. The atmosphere of immorality will destroy the mechanism of social protection and all will die.
The question arises: why did the rat community leave, why could not the "king" be destroyed? In this behavior, too, has a profound meaning. Collective mind, which in this case can be considered an instinct, counted that the elimination will be attended by the strongest individuals, the elite of society. Who knows what will happen to them when they bite their teeth into the living flesh of an immoral fellow. Will not his infectiousness be infected?
Even rats do not want to live in a civil society built on constant war with each other, tearing the one into the plural. Rats are smarter than humans. Fairly fearing that the rational logic of egoism will catch the rat elite, they go elsewhere.
If we fantasize and imagine that society has not abandoned the immoral fellow, but has remained with him, it is easy to assume that he would infect the elite with his rational logic. Also, I would think of how to do this step-by-step and imperceptibly, in full accordance with the logic. Instead of one "rat king" would appear a whole cast of such "mutants". Without principles, they would quickly defeat the traditional elite. Then we would find a way to give the new order the status of justice and legality. If we completely let go of the reins of fantasy, logic leads us to the formation of a democratic society. The members of the new society would themselves choose those who will eat this very society.
The rat saves from such a transformation the absence of freedom in human understanding. The absence of such a powerful intelligence, as in humans. They are guided by instinct. Instinct determines the main value of society is not food and not even the life of an individual rat, but morality. This is the foundation on which any social structure is built. For the sake of its integrity, they leave from the source of infection. While preserving the foundation, the rats retain themselves as a single society with the traditional scale of values, ultimately remaining as a species.
Human society does not have such an instinct. But it is also based on morality. If you remove this foundation, the whole construction quickly turns into a mountain of garbage, which begins to rub yourself to the state of powder, that is, when there is nowhere else to be smaller. To rub into powder means to cut off the roots, traditions, way of life and, most importantly, to nullify the moral foundations. For society, the last stage of crushing is the moment when it turns into no more than unrelated individuals. There is an atomized society, human dust, building material for a new world order.
Do you want to get an image of the processes going on at the world level? Look at the table behind which you are sitting. There are different items from different materials. Each object is like a prototype of each people. Objects are original and not connectable. While they are intact, it is impossible to create something of them. But if all of them, and a ceramic ashtray, and plastic, and paper, grind into dust and mix, will get a homogeneous mass. Then this mushy mass - under the press, and pressure will create something fundamentally new. It can be anything, any configuration, the characteristics of which even hard to guess.
The destruction of human society is carried out according to the technology of the "rat king". The whole blow is concentrated on the destruction of morality. His notions are burned out in all ways.
The consumer society teaches: there are no ones in nature. All strangers, everything is potential food. The most optimal food is those who are nearby and consider themselves your loved ones. And he does not suspect that you really are a rat king. He believes, and you reap it.
Such "rat kings" are becoming more and more in modern society. These are the most terrible predators. They unite in groups, treating compatriots as cattle (food). Having discovered the "truth" that one can build one's happiness on someone else's misfortune, they first acted on the forehead - they "devoured" the people openly. Then they realized that the best option is to devour beautiful high words under the veil.
From the screens streamed streams of promises and high-flown words about freedom and equality. Initially, the "kings" were not going to fulfill the promised. For them it was only a means to lure "food". They were torn to key knots of a society that under a covering of beautiful words to guzzle the. Every year they gained strength, became stronger, more resourceful and dangerous. Their main danger is that they do not externally differ from healthy members of society. They have learned to camouflage themselves so that they look better than their honest fellows. But if you do not listen to words, but look at things, it's easy to see the essence of these creatures.
All the power of their mind and will is concentrated in a narrow selfish sector. They forgot how to think in terms of society and the state. They think only of themselves and their brood. They feed on their brethren in the same way as that rattle. They are many, they have incredibly bred, and their number continues to grow. They divided into small and large, breaking the country into hunting grounds, hunting and feeding places.
Small "rats", who are struggling in the criminal sector, reasoned - here lies a drunk, in his pocket money. Anyway, someone will take it. If so, why not me? And he took it slowly. Then he took it from the half-drunk. The explanation was different: he still drink, and I need money for the right things. And then he came to the idea: if everyone does not have enough money, everyone lives badly, then let the strongest survive. Then he looked for the victim, beat on the head and robbed. In the absence of morality, there is nothing to object to such logic.
In business, logic first led to the idea that a person can be fired, thrown out into the street. The course of thought is clear: if I do not throw it out, I'll burst, and eventually it will still be on the street. And I'm with him. If he is there anyway, let it be better without me. And fired.
The second stage: let it work, but you can not pay a salary. Otherwise I'll burst, and everyone will be on the street. And so the enterprise will remain. And conscious delayed payments began.
The third stage: for example, an entrepreneur consciously began to make products harmful to health. If I think about the fate of strangers, I’ll go broke. Let them think about themselves. For him, the confreres were nothing more than warm, live meat, which itself crawls in its mouth.
Politicians talked the same way. The first scrapping, eating a corpse, is a promise that it is unrealistic to fulfill it. Logic: if you do not promise with three boxes, you will not be chosen. Choose another, worse than you, who promises that his mouth will utter. Since in any case, society will be deceived, but in one case you will be among the fools, and in the second case among the elect, let there be a second option.
An analogue of the second stage of the breaking of morality, devouring a half-dead fellow, is the trade in places in its party. The logic is also clear, we need money for the elections. If you build yourself a "high school student", the money will take competitors. As a result, someone will take the money anyway, and in any case will be selected. Since it is inevitable, let it be better if I take it than someone.
The third stage, the devouring of a living and healthy fellow, is the lobbying of laws that are detrimental to society. The logic is the same. If you refuse to participate in the direct robbery of society, it will be robbed by others. The cannibalistic law will still be pushed, and if so, what difference does it make through whom it will be done? Better let through me.
Today, the political public sector is a bunch of "rats" of the last stage. They have nothing sacred, nothing personal, only business. And this process can not stop. He will improve, obeying rational logic.
Public officials, too, with the help of rational logic gradually broken morality. At first, many were shy when they were offered money. Soviet installations, that it is mean, still worked. Then they called the bribe in another word, which removed the reflex to the word “bribe”, and the process started. Nobody took the bribe now. Now "rolled away", "brought" and "sawed". These were no longer thieves, but respected members of society using the “window of opportunity”. The most terrible thing happened - by default and behind the scenes in the eyes of society it was legalized. A man could trade his honor. The society entrusted him with a general cash desk, and he distributed it to predators for a bribe. A decent woman would reject an offer for money to engage in sex. Consumer society officials selling public goods sank below the body trading women. She even trades her, and these strangers. In general, it was called the "business approach to life."
At a certain stage, they even went so far as to officially admit: they say that in the administrative sector there was a market with its own rules and prices. If so, why not legitimize it? Simply put, a proposal was made to legalize embezzlement and corruption, as well as prostitution. Like, everyone knows that it is! At that time, the legalization of all three vices was rejected, but the process of decomposition is underway, everything changes ... Practice shows: the phenomenon that has arisen, if it has roots in society and nothing can withstand it, one day it will be legalized. In the foreseeable future, if nothing prevents the ongoing processes, we will see what we cannot imagine today. Everything will be sold and bought. What cannot be sold will disappear. For example, conscience, because it evaporates at the time of sale. The first stage of breaking the morality of civil servants was offering a bribe in the form of gratitude for legal, but, for example, accelerated work. Then they offered to “eat half-dead”. This was expressed in the implementation of ambiguous orders. For example, to break through the budget of financing of any school, and to take a rollback from the allocated amount. The logic is the same - you refuse, another will agree. And here you will earn money yourself, and benefit for children. The third stage is “eating the living and healthy.” Under a specious excuse, it is proposed to steal, for example, money for the sick.
Outwardly, the scheme is, as a rule, very pious, the mosquito of the nose does not undermine. But knowledgeable people understood everything. And again the same logic - you will not take it, another will prompt. Better you won't do it to anyone, they will drank the budget, and you will remain a fool. “Rat kings”, having passed all the circles of logic, have been released into society. They understand their people as food. Meals they liked, and they themselves take the initiative. Appetites are growing, technology is improving, “rats” are grouped together, between which competition begins. To be understood, members of these groups do not consider accomplices for their own. There can be no such people there. These are partners that help each other devour their brethren. As soon as the partner weakened, he was immediately devoured by his former partners. No, not even the former. Devoured and devoured continue to be partners. I even began to cultivate a new morality, like, nothing to be offended at me, it is my fault that I relaxed, I just took advantage. Nothing personal, just business! New conditions generate new logic.
Partnership comes down to devouring the weak, whoever this weak one is, even though his brother. "Rats" remained lifelong partners, until his death. If a weakened partner, who had gathered to feast on his fellows, had a pretty bitten time to escape, he would begin to denounce the "rat kings", and carried the rubbish out of the hut. So he hoped to recover in the same place. Someone succeeded, and he was again taken "into the cage", as if nothing had happened. Well, think about it, you wanted to devour me, but I did not give up. Now we sit together and think about how to devour anyone, and we look one after another if the partner has not weakened or started eating. A constraining factor is the strength of the partner and his same willingness to devour you. The picture we have drawn is only a pale reflection of the current mores. As long as people take the words about liberty, happiness and equality as a coin, while they “work” with the electorate, go to elections or participate in the “orange” revolutions, they, without knowing it, create a system that produces “rat kings”. Some people today devour others. In the forehead or by deception, technology is secondary here. The main thing is direct cannibalism. Yes, those who are at the top, do not personally smear in blood. It is at the lower level of the "rats" that the direct robbery of the brethren goes.
At the top, indirect cannibalism occurs, which is also cannibalism. And on such a scale that the bottom and never dreamed of. The money received by the methods described above is the essence of another's grief, suffering, death. If the "rats" are shiny with fat, then someone has lost his life. It only seems that the weak separated only with wallets. No, these processes lead to the physical death of the weakest members of society. It is not difficult to verify this by looking at the dynamics of death and fertility.
Russia is dying under the rule of "rat kings". You cannot blame people for not linking corruption, corruption and unprincipledness with personal grief, personal problems. Too long cause-effect chain is obtained. Intuitively, they realize that they are being fooled, but that's where and how ... For that, an elite is needed in order for the strong to protect the weak. The situation needs to be urgently corrected by introducing a law on the responsibility of managers. There is no liability without punishment! And, of course, sifting administrative officials according to the presence of conscience and the human system of the psyche.
Information