Military Review

They can not share the "inheritance" Kudrin

48
The other day, the “main” one again proved himself, and, as many people believe (even in the highest echelons of power), the country's only economist, Aleksey Kudrin. He said that the ruling party needs to take full responsibility for the current economic stagnation. Like, 2-3% growth of the economy, gentlemen of United Russia, on your conscience. According to Kudrin, the departure of economic policy in the country does not correspond to plans for the modernization of the Russian economy.




Immediately after these words, the very "gentlemen of United Russia", through the mouth of the chief observer of party values ​​(and the party, it turns out, has them) Andrei Isayev said that Alexei Leonidovich was fundamentally wrong. They also said that Kudrin allows himself to be cynical in general, because he should be responsible for the stagnation, because for many years he, being Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister, did not give them (United Russia) money for modernizing economic leaps.

An interesting correspondence squabble, isn't it ... Its main meaning for us and you - the average citizens of Russia - is that both the former authorities and the current authorities finally finally almost unanimously declared that there were economic problems in the country, and even applied the term of the sample of the Brezhnev era - stagnation. About the decline in economic growth before the statements of Kudin and Isaev, we, as it were, guessed ourselves ... It was suggested by statistics. But in our country one thing is statistics, and another thing is the unwitting confirmation of these statistics by those who, one way or another, should be involved in the development of the country's economy.

Now it turns out that the problem was voiced, but after that for some reason they did not start working to bring the economy out of a stagnant state, but began to look for the guilty. Yes, we know well these guilty. You can at least by name, but the list is too long to get.

And it’s quite “wonderful” that Kudrin calls United States guilty, and United Russia calls Guilty guilty. Doesn't it come to their mind that they are flesh of flesh? .. Yes, of course it comes, but only personal ambitions and interests in this case are above the interests of the Russian people, for which all these bureaucratic hordes must work. And if it is higher, then the search for the switchmen begins. The main thing, it turns out, is to wipe the dirt from your suit, and at the same time throw it over into another's suit. Apparently, neither one nor the other have enough spirit to admit that the current economy is their collective brainchild, and if the “father” and “mother” brainchild turned out to be not the most intelligent and beautiful, then it is foolish to make claims to each other ...

Actually, the accusations go in a mode: you are in power now - you answer, and the answer: you yourself were in power - it means you are the first to answer. Well, this is no longer a policy, but, excuse me, a kindergarten.

By and large, all these gentlemen, who staged the game of judges "guilty - not guilty", need to be assembled in one room, put at the table and not released until the unpromising mutual claims are exhausted, and a real plan of withdrawal of the Russian economy from the rather unintelligible state in which it is now located. And if such a plan is not presented, then you can find others. As you know, we have no irreplaceable ones, especially if we take into account the current direction of economic policy.

Well, in fact: the official forecast of economic growth for the next year is within 2,6%. Once again: 2,6% ... For the first quarter of this year, the economy has grown by 1,6%. Not that nothing at all, but almost nothing. Even in the 2009 crisis year, it was better. What is it? A new crisis or is it the consequences of flaws in dealing with the previous crisis? In any case, such growth is clearly not enough to overcome the crisis ridges.

Of course, you can again look for the best comparisons for yourself with the economies of other countries: with Cyprus or Greece, for example, where, they say, there is a total recession in general, and we have some kind of growth, but growth. But so in that and salt that Russia is not Cyprus and not Greece. One resource base of our country is such that it is clearly inappropriate to talk about any difficulties in the energy sector or the manufacturing sector. The same Greeks with Cypriots from this question will clearly look at us and say: we would have your problems ... And, indeed, it is even scary to imagine what would happen to our financial system, if, God forbid, we would have such to put it mildly, the modest resource potentials that the listed European Union gentlemen have.

And on this background, our financiers allow themselves not to look for ways to achieve economic growth, but they are engaged in the most natural trolling - well, we, they say, as if the opposition ... And the ruling party against this background also gives out "pearls" ... Take at least Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, who, while in Sochi, also allowed himself to characterize the state of the Russian economic system. According to Medvedev, our economy, quote: "mediocre." And here is another quote from the Prime Minister regarding the situation in the country's financial system:
I really would not want to be such as youth slang is used to say, “sour”
.

What, however, exact economic terms are chosen ... The economy is “mediocre”, but not quite “sour”. It is strange that Dmitry Anatolyevich, like Deputy Isaev, did not recall Kudrin. But it would be completely in a single party spirit: they say, if anything, then all the questions to the former finance minister are for a long time out of the Government, but we, you see, cannot get rid of “his legacy” in any way.

And if you put aside all these mutual accusations of Russian politicians to each other, try to take a serious look at the Russian economy, then you need to determine the reasons for stagnation. One of its reasons is that the government has run out of economic incentives. In limbo is a small business. Against this background, the legislative base is almost completely absent, which will help Russia to join the WTO without any particular problems. We have been trying to explain for so long that joining the World Trade Organization is good, but for some reason even after joining no real legislative changes in this regard have been created. And according to this: our agricultural products start losing even on the domestic market of imported products, our transport companies are also pressed by foreign competitors, not everything is in order with the introduction of metallurgical products to the world markets, we are trying to dictate prices for our gas ... Why doesn’t are the barriers built? Why are there almost no restrictions for the implementation of imports, seriously beating on domestic producers? Why we do not put any of the competitors in place?

One gets the impression that neither the Government nor the legislators have answers to these questions yet. And Kudrin, come and be pleased ...
Author:
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 21 May 2013 07: 06 New
    22
    1. What was the growth of the economy under Kudrin? If Putin hadn’t dragged this G. ... with a capital letter into the studio and started to PR there, if the media hadn’t shown this swampy loser on TV, then Kudryashka had long been forgotten how dust had been wiped off last week.
    2. With regard to the personality of Isaev, while such people are in United Russia, her rating will fall. And I give 100%, as soon as he is kicked out of the ranks, he will melt next to Sobchak and yell about democracy. There is no more rotten person in united Russia.
    3. As long as those who received diplomas in the west get into economic positions, our entire economy will dance according to the laws of the West.
    1. Denis
      Denis 21 May 2013 07: 30 New
      +9
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      What about the personality of Isaev

      Here it is to the very point. It’s also interesting what the Dvorkovichi’s government is doing there ...
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 21 May 2013 07: 40 New
        +7
        Quote: Denis
        It’s also interesting what the Dvorkovichi’s government is doing there ...

        "Works" only for which state, there is a big question.
        1. Denis
          Denis 21 May 2013 08: 09 New
          +5
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          "Works" only for which state, there is a big question.

          It turns out that the king makes a suite ..
          1. ole
            ole 21 May 2013 11: 51 New
            +1
            Quote: Denis
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            "Works" only for which state, there is a big question.

            It turns out that the king makes a suite ..


            not only does but also has it without retinue anywhere, in short it turns out to manage poorly - "the steering wheel machine is not heard, it’s understandable Russian, but if there were a foreign car there would be beauty"
        2. nickname 1 and 2
          nickname 1 and 2 21 May 2013 09: 37 New
          +2
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Denis
          It’s also interesting what the Dvorkovichi’s government is doing there ...

          "Works" only for which state, there is a big question.


          The most “knowledgeable” and the most fussy ones are from HSE!
          A mosquito in the reeds will pickle = HSE with comments - this peak is not just a peak!
          But Glazyev is “building” the union state, the TS is the basis: the regulatory framework! Putin has a team!

          In my opinion: ALL THESE ANIMS = ANY IS NOT SIMPLY SUCH AS THEY WANT A BEAR! Ie closer to the feeder! It’s old, true, but in the new = it’s not important that you blather, it’s important that they hear you! and see. So - use.!
          Those. all are eager for power!
          1. elmir15
            elmir15 21 May 2013 11: 28 New
            +5
            Kudrin should not be allowed to speak at all, all that he does is harm Russia. Kudrin is the second Chubais.
        3. Denis
          Denis 21 May 2013 11: 28 New
          +3
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          "Works" only for which state, there is a big question.

          Last night, security of the President of the Russian Federation tried not to let Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich into the residence of Bocharov Stream in Sochi. According to Regnum, the official managed to get through the security post only after a call to Dmitry Medvedev.

          The Volvo car, in which were Arkady Dvorkovich, Prime Minister’s spokeswoman Natalya Timakova and protocol head Marina Entaltseva, arrived at the gates of the residence 10 minutes before Dmitry Medvedev’s motorcade. However, they did not let the car in, as the vice-premier of the Russian government was not on the lists.
      2. Vrungel78
        Vrungel78 21 May 2013 09: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: Denis
        It’s also interesting what the Dvorkovichi’s government is doing there ...

        This is an intimate secret
        1. scrack
          scrack 21 May 2013 21: 51 New
          0
          World Libertarian Ambassador
      3. baltika-18
        baltika-18 21 May 2013 11: 42 New
        +4
        Quote: Denis
        Here it is to the very point. It’s also interesting what the Dvorkovichi’s government is doing there ..

        By the way, for fans of Fedorov.
        The party "Free Russia", the ideology developer was Fedorov, and one of the organizers was Mikhail Dvorkovich, brother of the notorious Arkady.
        The fact that Mikhail is one of the advisers and associates of the infamous businessman Polonsky says a lot.
        One of the reasons why I do not trust Fedorov.
      4. Zeus
        Zeus 21 May 2013 12: 23 New
        +1
        It’s also interesting what the Dvorkovichi’s government is doing there ...

        Systematically destroying our economy.
    2. Vadivak
      Vadivak 21 May 2013 08: 18 New
      +6
      Quote: ...
      Kudrin generally allows himself cynical remarks, because he should be responsible for stagnation, since for many years, being the Minister of Finance and the Deputy Prime Minister, he did not give them (United Russia) money for modernization economic leaps.


      Kudrin, like all a simple pawn, just fulfilled the orders of the main United Russia party - the author of the "Putin Plan" of the party leader,

      - quote from the speech of the Secretary of the Presidium of the General Council of the United Russia Party Vyacheslav Volodin:

      In the socio-economic sphere, this is accumulation of social justice in a market economy. (Marx rests after a brain break)



      1. baltika-18
        baltika-18 21 May 2013 13: 28 New
        +3
        Quote: Vadivak
        In the socio-economic sphere, this is the accumulation of social justice in a market economy

        This is the pearl. Parnish is also tongue-tied in addition.
        I’m wondering how I was going to accumulate social justice. Here would be to listen to his thoughts on this subject. what
    3. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 21 May 2013 09: 26 New
      +4
      Not everything is written completely in this review, The main core is omitted here, after all, the ministers themselves do not make decisions on the long-term solution of problems in the country. For such purposes an entire Gaidar Academy was created. Economists at the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences spoke about this problem in a box even when Mr. Medvedev was President, And that they listened to them so they took note, And the economists of another academy are developing and preparing decisions because many experts are from there, I was always surprised by our authorities, because we have a lot of high-level specialists, but we don’t hear them at the top or say so displeasure, By the way, in April, I watched a program about China on TVC and was simply amazed, many CHINA experts were involved in it, I was amazed at the attitude to this country and most importantly, the arguments of these gentlemen, After all, they did not even talk about experience of the development of this country, they were not interested in one thing as fortunetellers when the country collapses under the problems of internal life, Imagine, They are not interested in how this the trana develops no they were interested in when everything collapses and it’s specialists, I’m annoyed by something else how can they occupy their posts if they carry this, That’s how many things and decisions that are made by us are made clear to them they don’t care about the experience of others, it’s sad program views
    4. vezunchik
      vezunchik 21 May 2013 17: 01 New
      0
      The West is trying to revive the corpse of Kudrin - but this is nonsense, he has already outlived his own!
      And what is the difference between Kudrin, Chubais Nemtsov and Edrossa ????
      1. igor.borov775
        igor.borov775 21 May 2013 17: 32 New
        0
        Do not mix these gentlemen, they are different, Kudrin did a lot for the USA, he spent tremendous energy saving the dollar, thanks to him the Yankees passed the crisis with minimal losses, there is no talk of us at all, it is thanks to him that huge resources of many were used countries with losses for themselves, It was with his assistance that the twenty and the BRICS were created, China disposed of green paper best of all, He invested just think about almost a trillion in the new economy with the latest technology, and the rest how it turned out depended on the powers that be, the Yankees would be grateful to him he took the trouble away from AMERICA, throwing AMERICA’s problems to everyone,
  2. DPN
    DPN 21 May 2013 07: 36 New
    +1
    Why don't we put any of the competitors in place?
    In all likelihood, the country is led along the path of Peter the Great, their Lomonosovs to the backyards, and the Westerners to the front. Something is inaudible for Glazyev, somewhere in Putin's backsides, and Kudrin and Chubais are really not replaceable in the West, they learned to ruin Russia.
    Therefore, there is no one to put competitors in their place. Yes and; golden parachutes; give out to no one will give out to no one.
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 21 May 2013 08: 25 New
      +5
      Quote: DPN
      In all likelihood, the country is led along the path of Peter the Great.


      God forbid, one of Peter's first reforms was to shave men, and in Russia, a squashed erysipelas was considered a sign of pederasty, well, Russian men did not want to be homosexuals like Europeans, so no, I reformed all one
  3. krasin
    krasin 21 May 2013 07: 36 New
    0
    Putin invited Kudrin to work in the government, he hesitates as a girl of marriageable age. It's about the country, about Russia, about your homeland. I don’t agree with Medvedev’s actions — he went away, but now Putin invited people, you need me, he just smiled. I can’t do such things, step over and work, for the sake of Russia.
    Although he is an outstanding economist, he is not a gift as a person! (To put it mildly)
    1. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 21 May 2013 09: 34 New
      0
      There isn’t even a present, If his management policy was a big mistake, who will remember this, No, he wants to be the main thing in the government for less, and he thinks he is an invisible opposition, they still can’t see it under a microscope, This is such a game for the people
    2. Middle-brother
      Middle-brother 21 May 2013 11: 06 New
      +1
      Quote: krasin
      Although he is an outstanding economist

      What is outstanding in it? Remember, for example, the crisis of 2008 of the year, remember the Stabilization Fund
    3. vadimN
      vadimN 21 May 2013 11: 10 New
      +6
      Quote: krasin
      Although he is an outstanding economist


      Kudrin is an outstanding economist !? Excuse me, my friend ... How did he "stand out"? The fact that he was recognized as the best economist in Russia still does not say anything.

      Who recognized? - His western colleagues and patrons.
      What is it recognized for? - For the fact that at a time when it was necessary to pour money into the native Russian economy, he, under the guise of creating a stabilization fund, diverted this money to Western banks. Read the official statistics, in which the funds of the stabilization fund were invested. The lion's share - in the so-called "securities" of the United States. That is, Kudrin’s “outstandingness” is that he, as an obedient footman of the Bilderberg club, diligently supported our economy with our money, helping it stay afloat and not drown in its debts.
      The fact that Putin is trying to reanimate this politico-economic smelly corpse, first of all makes you wonder who Putin works for ... He always and stably distinguished by "ability" to pick up a team. Is it a coincidence? I'm starting to doubt.
  4. treskoed
    treskoed 21 May 2013 07: 55 New
    +3
    The logical result of taxiing "average sour"!
  5. DEDUCHKA
    DEDUCHKA 21 May 2013 08: 08 New
    +6
    But the Chubais, Dvorkovichi, Shuvalovs are smiling and continue to build up their family capital. As long as there is gas and oil, the government will mask its actions under all sorts of Skolkovo, investing huge amounts of money there, which, to put it mildly, are being spent improperly. Money is not really invested either in the economy or in agriculture. And the results of accession to the WTO are already visible, especially our agricultural producers.
  6. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 21 May 2013 08: 30 New
    +7
    I can imagine if Kudrin becomes the prime minister, social programs will be pulled over two nodes. Instead of production growth, there will be a regime of severe economy. What will come of it? look at Greece.
    1. treskoed
      treskoed 21 May 2013 08: 35 New
      +9
      Moreover, the reserves will work in the USA and Europe (the best finance minister in the world)!
    2. My address
      My address 21 May 2013 23: 10 New
      0
      Vladimir! I think the same. Please watch my comm. from 22ch 26min.
      Sv, Al-dr.
    3. Constantine
      Constantine 22 May 2013 01: 59 New
      0
      I do not think that he will be made prime minister. If the West praises him, then something is wrong and Putin knows and understands this. Putin himself focused on this in a straight line, not by chance, in my opinion.
  7. zambo
    zambo 21 May 2013 08: 43 New
    10
    As my uncle (a clever male professor at a military school) said about Kudrin back in 2003: "And I would personally shoot this pro-Western" comrade "in the nose ..." And he justified why. All his predictions about Kudrin came true.
    1. not good
      not good 21 May 2013 09: 34 New
      0
      Well, I didn’t shoot ...
      1. zambo
        zambo 21 May 2013 15: 12 New
        0
        Well guarded ...
  8. Igoriok222
    Igoriok222 21 May 2013 08: 45 New
    +4
    With such an energy potential you need to go 10%! To clean the ranks of the "reformers", maybe the situation will change.
  9. afire
    afire 21 May 2013 08: 59 New
    +8
    Yesterday in the news they showed Dima, but it’s some kind of horror, and the Lebanese sat nearby nodded at his smart chatter.
    Yes you burn poor in hell! And Vladimir Vladimirovich until the end of the summer (although it will take a long time - in the coming weeks!) Is simply obliged to remove from the posts these pretzels, which are average ones say about the country's economy, which occupies a quarter of the planet. homegrown woodpecker. I hate it!
    I will remind him of the time, the change of which he apparently alone considers correct, of the ministers not of rubles, of a complete misunderstanding of what is happening (with the exception of lobbying, and this is the only thing his team is engaged in).
    Well WHY is he still there ??! it's a pest! How long will the GDP pretend that everything is normal?
    1. vadimN
      vadimN 21 May 2013 12: 29 New
      +3
      Quote: afire
      Well WHY is he still there ??! it's a pest! How long will the GDP pretend that everything is normal?


      Ha...! But what, GDP is not from the same team ??? The main pest.
  10. waisson
    waisson 21 May 2013 09: 10 New
    +1
    in general, as a minister who has stained himself or a higher official, I think they’ve been ordered not to politics, but to the development of abandoned virgin lands or raising livestock in a particular region
  11. T-130
    T-130 21 May 2013 09: 10 New
    +2
    To the count of this drone!
  12. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 21 May 2013 09: 15 New
    +8
    How much can I shuffle a greasy deck, and even a speckled one fool
  13. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 21 May 2013 09: 29 New
    0
    Oh, Kudrin stirs up water (and very subtly) ... who is behind him is the question ??? I do not believe him a very slippery type ..
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 21 May 2013 09: 36 New
      +4
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Oh, Kudrin stirs up water (and very subtle) ... who is behind him is the question ??

      And you do not even know the truth?
  14. Kovrovsky
    Kovrovsky 21 May 2013 09: 35 New
    +1
    Quote: Denis
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    What about the personality of Isaev

    Here it is to the very point. It’s also interesting what the Dvorkovichi’s government is doing there ...


    He has already stopped letting Putin unobtrusively! At this pace, and Medvedev will be under the doors!
  15. Vrungel78
    Vrungel78 21 May 2013 09: 47 New
    +5
    By and large, all of these gentlemen who made the game of judges “guilty - not guilty” must be gathered in one room, put at the table and not released until the hopeless mutual claims run out
    ... until all uranium is recovered am
    1. folds
      folds 21 May 2013 14: 11 New
      +1
      and they’ll get it - remove the snow, all, there is a lot of it in Siberia :)
  16. orff
    orff 21 May 2013 10: 00 New
    +6
    Sergey Glazyev: “Kudrin is an opponent of the development of our economy”

    "... this is an example of such a linear mechanistic thinking of a person who does not understand how the modern economy works. In the view of the monetarists, to whom he belongs, the economy is a set of ethereal economic agents, each of which maximizes profit, knows everything, lives in in a state of complete free competition and cannot imagine what new technologies are. Monetarists for some reason naively believe that if prices rise in one place, then they necessarily fall in another place. This reasoning, which is ridiculous from the point of view of reality, is based on the idea of ​​economics as the equilibrium state of soulless economic agents.If you have no scientific and technological progress, no monopolies, and everyone knows everything, then really, the more you give money to the economy, the higher the price, because the economy is full equilibrium, all profits are zero.
    Therefore, the scholasticism of our monetarists, including Alexei, reminds me very much of the political economy of socialism. Both are divorced from reality. Both have the goal of apologetics of the policies of certain people. In the Soviet Union, the apologetics of political economy was to justify the entire system of state planning as the best and most effective. But the theory of market equilibrium and monetarism as its most superficial and radical version was justified by the state’s non-interference in economic processes. That is, it is the apologetics of oligarchic capital. How to explain the views of an economist? We must first see whose interests these views reflect. The views of our monetarists reflect the interests of large oligarchic capital. "
  17. yanus
    yanus 21 May 2013 10: 42 New
    -4
    Again a super-mega analytic article. In Russia, stagnation ... Horror ...
    the author, however, forgot that a significant share of our economy is raw materials. And we take this raw material oddly enough to the damned Europe. And it’s not that stagnation, there’s practically a recession.
    Here the author needs to put together a bunch of gyrus and trace the logical chain:
    In Europe, recession / stagnation + almost defaults of some countries -> production falls in Europe -> Europe needs less raw materials -> raw materials prices creep down -> we multiply the reduced prices for the reduced amount of raw materials purchased -> the fall in Russia's incomes -> slowdown in GDP growth and economy as a whole -> stagnation.
    No, well, Kudrin the bastard is to blame. And the Jews, necessarily the Jews. Without the Jews, no way.
  18. k220150
    k220150 21 May 2013 10: 53 New
    +1
    There are smart people ..., well, YOU understand. Kudrin is definitely not one of the first. He is an economist, do not tell my slippers! Just look at him! A copy to illustrate the Lombroso system.
  19. Ustas
    Ustas 21 May 2013 13: 21 New
    +3
    One gets the impression that so far neither the Government nor the legislators have answers to these questions.

    And there will be no answer so far, such as Kudrin, Medvedev, Isaev, etc., will be in power.
    "You are not my brother!" movie "Brother"
  20. Tektor
    Tektor 21 May 2013 13: 31 New
    +2
    The problem is that the previous engine of the economy (oil and gas, metals and other resources of low redistribution) has slowed down yet, while the other (entrepreneurship) has not yet been turned on: the climate is not the same. Now they are looking for the possibility of its accelerated launch, they are looking for "incentives". The stump is clear, we need to reduce taxes and the corruption component, but what if the budget is on taxes? Moreover, the budget should always grow at an indecent rate (about 10% per year) in order to cope with the schedule of 20 tricks for the military-industrial complex! Clear goals are indispensable. And where to get them? At one time, Stalin solved a similar problem, and decided. But his methods do not suit us right now. True, he had one idea that we can adapt to our economy: a method of increasing efficiency. But to do this is not easy: we need bright heads ...
  21. sxn278619
    sxn278619 21 May 2013 14: 03 New
    +2
    It has long been known what needs to be done even in the conditions of our capitalism - competent import substitution with the tightening of those regulations (WTO) will allow you to have 7% per year in the next 10 years.
  22. luka095
    luka095 21 May 2013 18: 27 New
    +1
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    While those who received diplomas in the west are getting into economic positions, our entire economy will dance according to the laws of the West.

    And not only according to the laws of the West, but, most importantly, in his interests!
    Kudrin’s “unsinkability”, Putin’s invocation of power again, Medvedev’s comments (behaving like a daffodil) say only one thing - what was the course in the economy, this will remain. And modernization is more talk.
  23. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 21 May 2013 19: 09 New
    +1
    <<<< for some reason, even after accession (to the WTO), no real legislative progress in this regard (the creation of an appropriate legislative base) has been created. And according to this: our agricultural products begin to lose even in the domestic market of imported products, our transport companies are also pressed by foreign competitors, not everything is in order with the release of metallurgical products to the world markets, they are trying to dictate the prices of our gas ... Why not are barriers lined up? Why are there almost no restrictions on the implementation of imports that seriously hit domestic producers? Why are we not putting any of the competitors in place? >>>>
    This can only be explained by the fact that SO was conceived by the West and their liberal economic lobby in Russia - to PULL in unprepared Russia into the WTO as quickly as possible and while it will create a legislative framework designed to ensure the Russian economy’s seamless entry into the WTO, and with this our liberals not only DO NOT HURRY, but, it seems, are NOT GOING TO do it, the Russian economy under the WTO will "sour" until it finally degrades to the joy of the above gentlemen!
  24. Cheloveck
    Cheloveck 21 May 2013 19: 21 New
    +1
    And if you put aside all these mutual accusations of Russian politicians to each other, try to take a serious look at the Russian economy, then you need to determine the reasons for stagnation. One of its reasons is that the government has run out of economic incentives. In limbo is a small business. Against this background, the legislative base is almost completely absent, which will help Russia to join the WTO without any particular problems. We have been trying to explain for so long that joining the World Trade Organization is good, but for some reason even after joining no real legislative changes in this regard have been created. And according to this: our agricultural products start losing even on the domestic market of imported products, our transport companies are also pressed by foreign competitors, not everything is in order with the introduction of metallurgical products to the world markets, we are trying to dictate prices for our gas ... Why doesn’t are the barriers built? Why are there almost no restrictions for the implementation of imports, seriously beating on domestic producers? Why we do not put any of the competitors in place?
    Hmm, rhetorical questions, you need to understand?
    More or less thinkers foresaw these results back in those days when they were actively formed public opinion hung noodles on the ears.
    All in the same direction of finishing the domestic manufacturer, which is laid down in the 92nd, only a little more subtly.
  25. varov14
    varov14 21 May 2013 19: 43 New
    +1
    This mu..k was silent, would be in a rag, what he was doing as Minister of Finance. It’s time for the Central Bank to return to the bosom of the state, it’s enough to take an example from America, we print the wrong currency, not the Fed. And we keep something else’s currency in someone else’s bank, although those who make these stupid decisions do not earn it, in 12 years you could trigger a new industrial revolution.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. spirit
    spirit 21 May 2013 21: 58 New
    +1
    as Medvedev said in response to criticism:
    I'm a novice politician)))
    you think you’ve made a mistake, with whom it’s never happened)))) maybe you’ll be lucky with 10 ministers (for the benefit of friends and relatives)
    I’m afraid of this method (well, if he doesn’t get a new one) 11 the minister will be small, yellow and narrow-eyed)
  28. My address
    My address 21 May 2013 22: 26 New
    0
    In the photo, Kudrin, apparently, two weeks after meeting with the “admirer” of his economic talent? Hematomas are gone, but the teeth will not return.
    Now seriously. Who prevented him from making a simple focus. Buy for our gold exchange, given in the United States, the production line but at least something and give it to the state enterprise. Give away for free. In addition, the cost price and price will immediately become minimal due to the fact that there is no need to justify the cost of equipment (depreciation is zero). The people with a bang takes its own and spits on imports. The currency of the country begins to work for the country, as it should be.
    The given example is simplified, but fundamentally possible. There are other ways to turn around the economy, through the issue of securities. Do you think I and others on the forum are smart, but Kudrin is a moron? Not. He is a good financier, but not for Russia. I wonder why he praises the GDP? Kudrin is not even a Balsack Gobsek, he died a beggar on his millions. This one wants Russia to die, giving millions to his uncle.
    1. Sergey_K
      Sergey_K 21 May 2013 23: 39 New
      +1
      Quote: My address
      In the photo, Kudrin, apparently, two weeks after meeting with the “admirer” of his economic talent? Hematomas are gone, but the teeth will not return.
      Now seriously. Who prevented him from making a simple focus. Buy for our gold exchange, given in the United States, the production line but at least something and give it to the state enterprise. Give away for free. In addition, the cost price and price will immediately become minimal due to the fact that there is no need to justify the cost of equipment (depreciation is zero). The people with a bang takes its own and spits on imports. The currency of the country begins to work for the country, as it should be.
      The given example is simplified, but fundamentally possible. There are other ways to turn around the economy, through the issue of securities. Do you think I and others on the forum are smart, but Kudrin is a moron? Not. He is a good financier, but not for Russia. I wonder why he praises the GDP? Kudrin is not even a Balsack Gobsek, he died a beggar on his millions. This one wants Russia to die, giving millions to his uncle.

      Oh, if there was such a miracle line ...