Revealed the secret of provocation in the American Boston
Unfortunately, not all runners crossed the finish line. Three hours later, after the first athletes reached the finish line, an explosion thundered, after a few seconds - the second.
This is a terrorist attack map.
The moment of both explosions was captured in this photo.
After the sad 11 date of September 2001, when the World Trade Center skyscrapers were destroyed in a terrorist attack in New York and about 3000 people died, there were no more terrorist attacks in the USA!
And now, after 12 years, the first case. Eyewitnesses of the event and millions of viewers around the world immediately realized that this terrorist act, despite its many times smaller scale, was in its own way extraordinary and significant. Why? Now you will understand.
If I had been at the scene of the FBI investigators, then first of all I would try to find out WHAT EXPLODED in Boston ???
Initially, the population was given the following version of the incident: “According to the police, two powerful improvised explosive devices worked. It is possible that they were hidden in the trash cans. According to the latest data, as a result of the explosions, three people died, including an eight-year-old boy, 176 people were injured, the state of 17 is assessed as critical. ” Source: http://rus.ruvr.ru/2013_04_16/Obama-vistupil-s-obrashheniem-k-nacii-v-svjazi-so-vzrivami-v-Bostone/
Later, another official version appeared: “The explosive devices powered by the marathon in Boston were in six-liter pressure cookers placed, in turn, in bags, foreign media reported, citing a source familiar with the investigation. The explosive contained pieces of metal, nails and bearings. According to him, the law enforcement agencies still do not know how the explosive was activated, according to Interfax. At the same time, according to the CNN channel, investigators concluded that the terrorists probably used time bombs. ” Source: http://rus.ruvr.ru/2013_04_16/Organizatori-terakta-v-Bostone-razmestili-vzrivchatku-v-skorovarkah/
Now let's find out what really exploded in American Boston?
This picture captures the moment of the first charge detonation. Finishing board shows the exact time of fire.
Here we see that the burning process has already been completed, and a large column of smoke has risen to the sky. A marathon runner in a red T-shirt managed to run around 5 meters during this time. It is clearly seen that the ejection of fire and smoke occurred in the immediate vicinity of the wall of the building or exited from inside it.
What exploded here or what was burning ???
Backpack with 6-liter pressure cooker, which the terrorists turned into a bomb?
Trash can?
Let's find out.
In the photo below - the first explosion. This is Boylston Street.
Obvious damage has a building located on the left. Fragments of broken windows, lying outside the house, eloquently indicate that the process of explosion or burning was going on inside the building. The laws of physics say: when something explodes, fragments fly from the epicenter of the explosion to the periphery. Therefore, in our case there are only two options for explaining what happened:
1. The explosion occurred inside the building;
2. The pyrotechnic device was located not inside the building, but inside the window frame, and an explosion occurred in the space between windows of a large window block with the inscription “Lens Crafters”.
We look at the scene of the incident. It was made from the balcony of the building, one of the windows of which turned out to be blown up.
The picture reflects what happened on the site in front of the house approximately 3-5 minutes after the explosion, when the column of smoke emanating from the destroyed window had already dispersed.
On the right, we see a light cloud of smoke in the midst of people, and on the left, fragments of a ruined window block with the inscription “Lens Crafters” in the center.
What continues to smoke is clearly not connected in any way with broken glass.
If an explosion had occurred at the point of smoke, all or almost all fragments from broken windows would have been inside the building. These are the elementary laws of physics. When the blast wave comes from the epicenter of the explosion, it carries all objects with it. If an explosion had occurred where smoke is now visible, then 90% of the glasses would be inside the building. And they, as we see, are outside the building. This is particularly noticeable in the bottom photo.
We look now at the photo below. This is a different perspective. As a photographer, I was struck first of all by the reflection of the police in the left half-broken window. The window in the building is ordinary - it has two rows of glass. If there is a through hole in the right frame, then only the outer glass turned out to be embossed in the left frame. The second, the inner, turned out to be a whole !!! In it, the police and reflected in the mirror.
What does it say?
This says only one thing: there was no explosion inside the building. Otherwise, such a focus would not have happened. If the explosion was in the room, then all the windows would fly out at once. This picture proves (!) That the pyrotechnic charge was mounted between the glasses in the frame of the right window.
Inner glass in the left window could remain whole only in two cases:
1. If there was a blast wave, then it went to the butt of this glass, and it proceeded from the adjacent right window of the first floor.
2. There was no strong blast wave. The outer glass of the left window cracked and fell out from the intense heat emanating from the burning right window on the first floor.
Having such an obvious picture of the scattering of window glass fragments, it can be said that the space between the glasses in the lower right window was filled with pyrotechnic composition, which, when set on fire, gave a strong flame, but did not give a strong blast wave. This flame was so great that its heat caused the destruction of glass in the windows of the second floor. Also partially affected balcony on the third floor. What is clearly seen in this picture.
Thus, the picture of the incident is completely clear, and we can say that the first explosion in Boston could not be associated with the explosion of the 6-liter pressure cooker or with the explosion of the garbage can. The fire effect, captured by video cameras, gave a pyrotechnic charge of sufficiently high power installed inside the window frame labeled “Lens Crafters”. Fragments of window glass - irrefutable proof of this.
The Tsarnaev brothers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar, whom the US authorities were quick to declare responsible for the attack, could not do this in the presence of dozens and hundreds of people. And the protection of the event would not allow. This means that the pyrotechnic charge was laid inside the window in advance.
Consequently, we have reason to suspect the collusion of terrorists with the owners of the premises. After all, without their knowledge, who could have done this work?
A reasonable question arises: if the Tsarnaev brothers, who allegedly had bombs in their backpacks, could not do it, then who did it?
Personally, I noticed the presence in this attack of some Kabbalistics. We see the inscription on the window block “Lens Crafters”, and we know from the media that the guys who supposedly protected the marathon from terrorists were dressed in the form of a private security company Craft-international with a distinctive skull emblem and an inscription on the forehead Craft.
Is this a mere accident or intentional symbolism of Kabbalistic lovers ?!
Now let's find out what could create the effect of strong ground smoke at the explosion site No. 1 ?! The video, shown by CNN, clearly showed that the smoke coming from the building, where a powerful but short fire had occurred, quickly rose, and its color was light brown. On this frame you can also see where the center of secondary smoke was located. He was closer to the fence, about eight meters from the building. I marked it with a red circle. The center of secondary smoke gave a smoke of gray-blue color, which literally spread on the ground.
Judging by this photo, the source of secondary smoke was an ordinary army smoke bomb !!! She eventually gave all this smoke creeping along the ground.
What did the organizers of the terrorist act want to hide behind a smoke screen?
It seems that the smoke had to hide the technology of monstrous deception, which later could become some important "trump card" in the geopolitical game of the powerful. In this picture, we just see the work of smoke bombs. The red arrow indicates its location.
Now, friends, turn your mind on 100%!
If we assume that there was an explosion, then it could be only at the wall of the building. In this case, we have already established that the explosion site was a ground floor window.
If it exploded in such a way that someone had their legs (!) Blown off, then dozens of other people we see here should have torn off their legs. It is so?! However, here, at the site of the first explosion, the legs were cut off from only one person.
If you look closely at the photo above, then in the background in the smoke there is a noticeable person in a white jacket. Just below is the one who later turns out to be legless!
Here is the same frame, but at high magnification. It is clearly seen here that the future hero of all television News lies on his back, and above him conjure a mulatto woman and a man in dark glasses, whose head is hidden by a gray hood.
Here is the subsequent storyboard storyline.
From the side it may seem that a man, whose head is covered with a gray hood, and a mulatto woman are giving birth to a guy lying on his back. However, everything was much worse. Taking advantage of the smoke screen, they attached a dummy to it imitating severed legs. When this work was done, these two also began to portray the victims of the terrorist attack. Here they are in the center. This photo was taken from the opposite direction.
Behind the mulatto woman in a white sweater and a red jacket lies the one to whom the models of bloody feet were attached a minute ago. I marked its location on the frame with a red arrow. Please note that our legless "client" is already forgotten-forgotten. A man marked with a green marker, who has his back to us and holds a cowboy hat and an American flag in his hands, will soon accompany the poor guy when he is taken to a wheelchair. Pay attention to the girl indicated by the blue circle in the top picture. Now she will serve as a guide.
Here it is. And that was what was hiding (a man with his legs torn off) behind a dark-skinned mulatto in a white sweater and red jacket when she left this place.
This terrible picture saw the whole world.
The guy has no right leg, and his left leg below the knee is torn off, a bone sticks out of it! The knee of the left leg lies directly on the ground. If there was a right leg, then the left leg would lie on it. Once again I draw your attention: there is no RIGHT LEG !!! And in the bottom picture RIGHT LEG for some reason is! And, judging by the photograph, the lower third of the right leg is torn off, just above the ankle joint.
Compare yourself again.
But this tricks with the right foot does not end! In the photo below the knee of the right leg is gone again !!! Instead of the right knee, the bone now protrudes, and the knee joint, lower leg and leg together, have disappeared. By the way, pay attention, at what angle is the left leg sitting in a wheelchair. Judging by his face, this position does not cause him any difficulties. Try, friends, to sit yourself with healthy legs, and see how much is enough for you. For a person who has lost several liters of blood and received such a severe injury, it is physically impossible!
And our hero is absolutely vigorous, and, judging by his face, does not even remotely resemble a seriously injured person.
Whoever has not fully understood all these tricks, I explain: severed legs are dummies used by actors in Hollywood when making movies about the war.
A person who actually tears off one or even more than two legs will not grab his hands on a crippled limb. With such a severe injury, he should just lose consciousness from the painful shock and huge blood loss. This opinion was expressed by all the surgeons to whom I turned for advice. And one more discrepancy: so much crippled legs cannot be kept at a right angle. A terrible painful shock should relax all muscles.
On the Internet there is an amusing video taken with external surveillance cameras. It clearly shows how a hero with his legs torn off is transported down the street in a wheelchair in a sitting position (probably so that the spectacle is the most vivid, shocking and therefore memorable).
The camera recorded that the woman pushing the pram behind her suddenly raised her hand, and the whole sorrowful procession stopped.
What's the matter? It turns out that the wounded man literally fell off (!) The same hastily applied right leg, or rather, its props. The policeman was forced to squat in front of a man sitting in a gurney. He fitted the fallen off leg into place, after which the procession moved on. Obviously, it was after this intervention of the police officer that our hero lost his right leg and knee. Hollywood traditions, however!
And here is the video itself, where the policeman conjures over the alleged victims of the terrorist attack.
Do you see such a trick for the first time?
Here is another one for you. Consider it a test of ability to think.
Imagine that there are two victims: one has two legs torn off, the other has suffered injuries of moderate or even mild severity.
For their transportation are available:
1. Wheel chair;
2. Gurney, where the victim may lie.
Based on this data, who and where would you place ???
I would personally put a man with his legs torn off on a gurney, where he could lie. And I would put an injured person who has injuries of moderate or mild severity on a wheelchair, since there is nothing else at hand.
Now, attention, question!
Why at the explosion site # 1 in Boston everything was done against logic ?! The guy with his legs torn off was put in an uncomfortable for him on a wheelchair, and the mulatto woman next to him, who had never had injuries of even moderate severity before, was placed in a comfortable wheelchair ???
I hope you remember that it was she and the guy with the gray hood on her head who conjured earlier over Jeff Bauman, attaching him dummy legs.
Then on this lady was completely clean white blouse. Now, as we see, her blouse is literally smeared with something red, like blood.
So why, contrary to sanity, did the guy with his legs torn off end up in a wheelchair, and the dark-faced lady was in a bed with all the comforts ???
The answer to this question is obvious: Jeff Bauman had to see the whole world.
And finally, the third focus.
Here are two identical photos from Boston that have placed different newspapers. In the foreground we see a fair-haired girl, who seems to be in shock, sitting on the pope, and in the background, to the left, we see a man lying down, perhaps a woman, over whom a man in a red jacket bent. Pay attention to the injured legs. They are intact and have no visible damage.
Now look at the picture published in another newspaper. All the characters are the same, but the legs of the lying man already seem to be killed. And we see an open wound and an open fracture of the bones.
Photomontage?
And what else ?!
Here is a fragment of a photograph published in the first newspaper.
And now - in the second.
The falsification is obvious, and worked very roughly! At once two falsifications in one event, it, you see, bust!
On the very first day, the Americans themselves noticed this, and immediately appeared revelations on the Internet. Local bloggers very quickly identified a disabled guy who agreed to participate in this performance as a victim, who allegedly tore off his legs.
This is legless Nick Vogt! We recognized him! - began to write people on the Internet.
Do you think that the US administration and the FBI leadership were sitting quietly, and they didn’t have a heart when they saw that the people so easily expose them as criminals involved in this half-fake terrorist attack ?! Of course, no, they feverishly thought how beautiful it was for them to get out of this stories!
Soon the authorities controlled by the media provided other information to the people. The guy who was blown off by an explosion during the attack was not Nick Vogt. His name is Jeff Bauman! - Here he compare!
It really looks like!
Almost immediately, a photograph of Jeff Bauman appeared on the Internet, where it was clear that he was lying on a hospital bed. The picture, however, some not fresh. Apparently, it was filmed on a film camera. Does anyone use them now? In America? I can not believe it.
And here he is, three days after the amputation of both legs. Easily sitting on the fifth point, cheerful and even cheerful. And even distributes gifts to other patients.
Do you believe that this is possible? Me not! Because I know: even Christ could not perform such miracles!
And about the sad. Here is a photo from the site of the second explosion in Boston, which occurred at the same time, 15 on April 2013 of the year, 10 seconds after the first explosion. On the asphalt are visible numerous characteristic fragments and fragments left by a point explosive device. Judging by the radius of the fragments, the second explosion created a significant shock wave. In the center of the picture we see a guy stripped to the waist, bending over the body of a man, who also has torn wounds instead of legs. Where is this man now? Why don't we know his name? Where are his photos? Perhaps because there is no information about him, because it was a real victim of the terrorist attack. It is obvious that this person was absolutely not interested in the leadership of the United States and controlled by the media ...
Here, for comparison, another real victim from the site of the second explosion. There is no visible damage. The skin is of normal color, but the woman lies on the bed and is wearing an oxygen mask.
And our legless, having lost perhaps more than half of the blood, is sitting on a wheelchair at this time, has a rather peppy look and still manages to keep the remains of his legs in weight in a pose that resembles a gymnastic corner.
The question arises: why was all this props and all this monstrous deception required ?!
Why so much attention was drawn to the footless Jeff Bauman, and all the other victims of the terrorist attack in Boston who suffered from the second explosion, more powerful than the first, were almost immediately forgotten.
The media revealed this secret in just a few days.
The true organizers of the terrorist attack needed a valuable witness, the hero of the terrorist attack, who could identify (!) The terrorist. He had to recognize, of course, not the real terrorist, but only the one whom the US administration had prepared in advance for this role. The US administration really wanted this damned terrorist to be somehow connected with Russia and, at the same time, with Islamic radicals !!!
This was found in advance, as well as our legless actor. And not one. The terrorists were appointed brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, Chechens by nationality (Wow! That's cool! Chechens! Who does not know them!).
The brothers came to live in the US exactly 10 years ago, and there was already some bad glory behind them ... So they came up to this role perfectly.
According to the legend, which was soon voiced by the media, the main terrorist was installed when the FBI officers visited the person who lost both legs in the hospital. When Bauman allegedly woke up after the operation (18 or 19 of April), he told the FBI representatives everything he saw and remembered. This is how the story was told by the newspapers. “The athlete waited at the finish for his bride, she participated in the marathon for the first time. A man in dark glasses, in a jacket, with a hood over his head stood next to him. He looked at Bauman and put a backpack next to him, and then he disappeared. A few minutes later the explosion thundered. The marathon runner gave an accurate description of the terrorist as soon as he woke up after the operation. He asked for paper and a pen and wrote: “Bag, I saw a man, he looked right at me,” and described the exterior of the terrorist in as much detail as possible. Bauman’s testimony helped the FBI identify the suspect in the photographs. ”
The security services described the appearance of the terrorist as described by Bauman quickly identified with Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who came to see the marathon not alone, but along with his younger brother.
So the brothers Tsarnaev became terrorists.
But we already found out that it was not at all some backpack that caused the first explosion in Boston, but a window in the window block with the inscription “Lens Crafters”, between the glasses of which a sufficiently large pyrotechnic charge was laid!
What happened later, the whole world learned from the criminal news voiced by the American media.
19 April 2013, on Friday, in the suburbs of Boston, after stubborn persecution, accompanied by a shootout with police, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was detained. His older brother, 26-year-old Tamerlan, died during a special operation. The brothers put up desperate resistance to the police. According to the officers, they overtook Tamerlane first. He was wounded on the ground, and the police were ready to take him, but at that moment Johar moved him in an off-road vehicle. The injuries of Tsarnaev Sr. were fatal. Johar himself, probably at that moment was already wounded in the throat. He soon abandoned the car and tried to hide in a boat in the courtyard of one of the private houses. A day later, the owner of the boat, finding blood stains on it, called the police, which detained Johar.
In this story, there is no doubt that the elder Tsarnaev was killed immediately, because no one except his mother and relatives was alive to anyone, and the younger Tsarnaev was injured in the throat, so that he obviously could not utter a word in his protection.
One thing is clear from all this false history: this bloody provocation was directed against Chechnya, which is part of Russia.
It was also directed against the entire Muslim world, since the Tsarnaev brothers were Muslims.
In the United States, this provocation immediately gave rise to unhealthy anti-Russian and anti-Muslim sentiments among those who are not used to thinking with their heads, who are not learned and do not know how to analyze facts.
As soon as the media started talking about Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaevs (and it happened on 19 on April 2013 of the year, allegedly at the suggestion of legless Jeff Bauman, who described one of the terrorists), Sarah Palin spoke on American television, who in 2008 was a candidate for the highest state post in the United States from Republican the party that literally said: “We know that they are Muslims from the Czech Republic. I bet, I will express the opinion of many Americans, saying that I want to go there right now and teach these guys a lesson. And let's not stop at the Czech Republic, let's go through all the Arab countries! The Arabs must learn that it is impossible to come here like this and undermine everything. Let's fire a pair of nuclear missiles in Islamabad, burn Prague, then bomb the hell out of Tehran. We have to show them that we are serious. "
This fiery performance by Sarah Palin instantly shocked the public around the world. Here is how “Rossiyskaya Gazeta” commented it: “The intelligence level of this“ American politician ”, no doubt, goes off scale. She confused Chechnya with the Czech Republic, and then also decided that the Czech Republic is in the Arab world. But the most important thing, if you do not pay attention to all these blunders, it turns out that the ex-presidential candidate of the United States made a call to bomb Chechnya, which is an integral part of Russia. ” Source: http://www.rg.ru/2013/04/26/terakt.html
Here, friends, that may follow such provocations, and this is what they are for.
3 May 2013. Murmansk. Anton Blagin
Post scriptum
The great deception of the world community continues today.
The US leadership is now trying to accuse terrorism of Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s mother, referring to the audio recording provided by the leadership of the Russian FSB, where during the communication between the mother and one of her sons the call to jihad is allegedly heard. Now, on the basis of this audio recording, the American media are forcing a new hysteria.
Information