Military Review

By September of this year, peacekeeping units will be created in the Airborne Forces

32
By 1 this September, paratroop units of peacekeepers will be formed in all airborne units, the commander of the Russian Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Colonel-General Vladimir Shamanov told reporters today.


"In four divisions, we will have one battalion for 100 per cent staffed by contract military personnel who will be involved in UN peacekeeping operations and protecting the interests of our allies within the CSTO," the commander of the Airborne Forces explained.

"At the same time, the 31 Guards separate assault assault brigade stationed in Ulyanovsk, as the most air-conditioned unit of the Airborne Forces, will be ready to begin peacekeeping tasks already from 1 this June," he said.

According to Shamanov, the post of deputy commander for peacekeeping forces and the Collective Rapid Response Forces / KSOR / CSTO is being appointed in the command of the Airborne Forces to ensure the management of peacekeeping activities and the corresponding staff unit is formed.

Since 2009, the CSTO RRFR consists of two airborne units - the 98 Guards Airborne Division / g. Ivanovo / and 31-th Guards Separate Air Assault Brigade / g. Ulyanovsk. These formations are permanent participants of the training and combat activities conducted by the CSTO leadership as part of the CORF, including large-scale joint exercises in the territory of the allied states.

As the spokesman of the Airborne Forces Colonel Alexander Kucherenko, in September of this year, units of the 31-th Guards Separate Air Assault Brigade will participate in a joint exercise "Interaction-2013" with the CSTO RRF, which will be held in Belarus.
Originator:
http://www.itar-tass.com/c134/729576.html
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. vadimus
    vadimus 8 May 2013 07: 16 New
    +5
    Yes, it's time to create peacekeepers in the missile forces ...
    1. bask
      bask 8 May 2013 07: 23 New
      +3
      life
      By September of this year, peacekeeping units will be created in the Airborne Forces

      BETTER BY SEPTEMBER, rearm, one division of the Airborne Forces, DMD 4M. !!!!
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 8 May 2013 07: 37 New
        +1
        Quote: vadimus
        Yes, it's time to create peacekeepers in the missile forces ...

        That’s for sure, there’s a motorized rifle brigade, sharpened purely for peacekeeping missions, why should we even draw paratroopers?
        1. Refund_SSSR
          Refund_SSSR 8 May 2013 07: 41 New
          +2
          In the speed of fixing on the ground and the speed of deployment, there is still a difference, and hence the special tactical applicability.
          First, the Airborne Forces are fixed, and then the motorized arrows are pulled up.
          In Syria, such tactics would be very useful.
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets 8 May 2013 07: 56 New
            +2
            Quote: We refund_SSSR
            In the speed of fixing on the ground and the speed of deployment, there is still a difference, and hence the special tactical applicability.
            First, the Airborne Forces are fixed, and then the motorized arrows are pulled up.

            You mean combat tactics, and I mean peacekeeping missions. They, of course, also look like combat ones, but to put the Airborne Forces at the checkpoint is like using Peter the Great to fight piracy.
            1. Refund_SSSR
              Refund_SSSR 8 May 2013 08: 05 New
              +3
              Tomorrow they will say that Israel sent troops to Syria, how will the quick response be carried out? How is Yugoslavia walking across Europe for a week?
              Or within a few hours the landing will be deployed, and in a few hours the main key points and heights will be taken? (at the same time, these will be formally peacekeeping units, and not the troops of the Russian Federation)
              And after a week, motorized arrows will also be pulled up, after which cordons, etc. will be exhibited.
              Or do peace enforcement operations no longer play a role in duration? And if you recall 08.08.08?
              1. Vladimirets
                Vladimirets 8 May 2013 08: 08 New
                0
                Quote: We refund_SSSR
                Tomorrow they will say that Israel sent troops to Syria, how will the quick response be carried out? How is Yugoslavia walking across Europe? Within a week or within a few hours, the landing will be deployed and after a few more will the main key points and heights be mated?
                And after a week, motorized arrows will also be pulled up, after which cordons, etc. will be exhibited.
                Or do peace enforcement operations no longer play a role in duration? And if you recall 08.08.08?

                Do you see the difference between UN peacekeeping missions and military operations? 08.08.08 this was a war, actually.
                1. Refund_SSSR
                  Refund_SSSR 8 May 2013 08: 11 New
                  +1
                  08.08.08 I cited as an example the timing of hostilities in small territories and for the fact that you could estimate that by that time, while the motorized rifles are swelling, the whole action will be over and peacekeepers will not be needed.
                  Or is it hard to understand?
              2. Armata
                Armata 8 May 2013 08: 13 New
                +2
                Quote: We refund_SSSR
                Or within a week or within a few hours, the landing will be deployed, and in a few more will the main key points and heights be taken?
                These are not attack aircraft. Keyword PEACEKEEPERS. No need for them to land and gain a foothold. There is a political decision to introduce a peacekeeping contingent. They are delivered there by air and do not land and take over, namely, they take the warring parties away. So there are no paratroopers here.
                1. Refund_SSSR
                  Refund_SSSR 8 May 2013 08: 15 New
                  +2
                  Keywords - prompt response.
                  Quote: Mechanic
                  No need for them to land and gain a foothold.

                  Maybe they do not need weapons? Since it’s peacemakers from the word PEACEKEEPERS, then let them ride with white doves of the world in hand and give daisies to everyone?
                  1. Armata
                    Armata 8 May 2013 08: 29 New
                    +3
                    Quote: We refund_SSSR
                    Maybe they do not need weapons? Since it’s peacemakers from the word PEACEKEEPERS, then let them ride with white doves of the world in hand and give daisies to everyone?
                    No need to juggle. The task of the peacekeeping contingent is not to storm and seize, but to stand between the belligerents and pull them apart. The airborne forces have completely different tasks.
                    1. Refund_SSSR
                      Refund_SSSR 8 May 2013 08: 32 New
                      0
                      We learn the history of the use of peacekeeping forces.
                      I don’t intend to earn a textbook on tactical-tactical and tactical combinations, to any unknown personalities.
                      And I did not talk about clashes.hi
                      1. Armata
                        Armata 8 May 2013 09: 24 New
                        +1
                        Quote: We refund_SSSR
                        We learn the history of the use of peacekeeping forces.
                        I don’t intend to earn a textbook on tactical-tactical and tactical combinations, to any unknown personalities.
                        And I did not talk about clashes.
                        One water and no specifics.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                  2. Lopatov
                    Lopatov 8 May 2013 13: 02 New
                    -1
                    You are absolutely right. The specifics of the actions of peacekeepers are most similar to the specifics of the actions of the Internal Troops. Observation, protection of important objects, search of vehicles ... But the latter cannot be used for this by default.

                    Retraining Airborne units on this topic is a big stupid thing.
                2. Oboz
                  Oboz 11 May 2013 10: 34 New
                  0
                  I completely agree with you. The lessons and threats of what is happening in Syria. Plus a decision on military operations abroad. Another plus is peace enforcement.
              3. Retx
                Retx 8 May 2013 11: 34 New
                0
                And where to deliver them? Accidentally not at the airport on the territory of the conflicting parties? They will naturally be met there with flowers and an orchestra, like the Americans in Magadishu.
                In Pristina, some airborne forces were operating at the airport and for some reason they were fixed there. They probably forgot that they are PEACEKEEPERS.
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 8 May 2013 13: 08 New
                  0
                  You may not be aware, but peacekeepers appear in the war zone only with the full consent of the conflicting parties. After the ceasefire. And with guarantees of their safety.

                  The Americans in Mogadishu were not peacekeepers. It was a UN operational group that carried out direct military intervention.
            2. svp67
              svp67 8 May 2013 08: 16 New
              +1
              Quote: We refund_SSSR
              Tomorrow they will say that Israel sent troops to Syria, how will the quick response be carried out?
              Well, here the scenario has already been worked out - the UN "Security Council" is urgently meeting, a decision on recognizing Israel as the aggressor and a call to end hostilities are being pushed. While this "tegamotina" is going on, our large landing ships appear off the coast of Syria, with escort ships. After Israel stops its aggression, and it will do so, otherwise it will face big trouble, the UN Security Council makes a decision on the deployment of peacekeeping forces and their composition, here our BDK with the marines enter into action - landing, seizing a bridgehead, receiving " peacekeepers "...
              1. Refund_SSSR
                Refund_SSSR 8 May 2013 08: 20 New
                +4
                Was there a Russian contingent in Yugoslavia? Did they fulfill a peacekeeping mission? Sent forces after the UN resolution or without it?
                On the night of June 12, 1999, paratroopers of the Russian peacekeeping forces, ahead of NATO forces, entered the territory of Yugoslavia. With a march from Bosnia and Herzegovina, they occupied the Slatina airfield near Pristina, and a few hours later other foreign armies arrived there [76] [77] [78] [79]. Although the commander of NATO forces in Europe, American General Wesley Clark ordered the British General Michael Jackson, who commanded the group in the Balkans, to capture the airfield before the Russians [80], the British replied that he was not going to start the Third World War [80].
                And if ours were late? and was the speed factor decisive?
                Did peacekeepers capture key points or not?
                Guys with general shoulder straps, do you even know something about tactics? or did you come to chat like that?
                Yes, at least get angry!
              2. Akhtuba73
                Akhtuba73 8 May 2013 10: 37 New
                +3
                Quote: svp67
                Well, here the scenario has already been worked out - the UN "Security Council" urgently gathers, a decision on recognizing Israel as the aggressor is being pushed

                See fig, fantastic! So that Israel and the "aggressor" go to the Security Council? Before that Obama must join United Russia
                1. aksakal
                  aksakal 8 May 2013 10: 55 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Akhtuba73
                  See fig, fantastic! So that Israel and the "aggressor" go to the Security Council? Before that Obama must join United Russia

                  - they may not recognize the aggressor, but it will be very difficult for them to ignore the fact of the IDF conducting military operations on foreign territory of military operations. Well, they will take up legal casuistry, call Syria and Israel the conflicting parties, without accusing any one party of aggression and decide to introduce peacekeepers. An attack on peacekeepers is tantamount to declaring war on a country that introduces peacekeepers. As a matter of fact, the fact that Saakashvili killed the Russian peacekeepers in the conflict on 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX did not allow the West to peck Russia in the information war - through the killing of peacekeepers, Georgia became the aggressor, there is nothing to be done, in this rude work and the jamb of saakashvili in front of the West -)) )).
                  Therefore, the introduction of peacekeepers should not at all resemble an assault operation. On the contrary, one needs imposingness, calmness and emphasized leisurelyness when introducing peacekeepers into the area of ​​action of the conflicting parties. And they killed at least one peacekeeper - those who will come next - those will have the task of giving in the teeth, with the capture of heights and all that.
                  1. Akhtuba73
                    Akhtuba73 8 May 2013 11: 25 New
                    0
                    Quote: aksakal
                    Well, they will take up legal casuistry, call Syria and Israel the conflicting parties, without accusing any one party of aggression and decide to introduce peacekeepers.

                    Yes, the process is not fast, judging by the description. Plus, take into account the immense opposition of the "friends of Syria" in the Security Council. Turned inside out, turned into endless yap about terms and in addition bring in peacekeepers from the countries of the Arab League. And these are those bloodsuckers ...
        2. biglow
          biglow 8 May 2013 14: 48 New
          0
          when Israel meets with our peacekeepers, it will quickly change its mind about attacking Syria. It would be good to throw heavy weapons for a kit and it would be good ..
      2. Renat
        Renat 8 May 2013 08: 19 New
        0
        And this is to rustle in the ranks of the so-called fighters for freedom and democracy.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. Romn
    Romn 8 May 2013 07: 47 New
    0
    The very fact that such connections are being created with us is already pleasing, this is an open statement by the country on future actions in external conflicts and issues. And the fact that the airborne forces are also used correctly is the most prepared and mobile troops, the transfer of which can be carried out to any place!
  • tronin.maxim
    tronin.maxim 8 May 2013 07: 19 New
    +2
    Probably our peacekeeping military will bring about peace where democracy has come. lol
    1. d1m1drol
      d1m1drol 8 May 2013 09: 05 New
      +1
      minus for grammar, and so koment norms =)
  • Ruslan67
    Ruslan67 8 May 2013 07: 19 New
    +1
    I don’t know how in the host country, but among the multinational peacekeeping contingent, our guys will definitely restore order good Drunk Russian paratrooper with a stool. Not to be confused with Serdyukov !!! these are weapons of mass destruction am
    1. tronin.maxim
      tronin.maxim 8 May 2013 07: 22 New
      0
      Quote: Ruslan67
      Drunk Russian paratrooper with a stool. Not to be confused with Serdyukov !!! these are weapons of mass destruction

      That's for sure! And if it’s a holiday of landing, then everything, MULTI-COLORED, CLICK ON YOUR ANGLES!
      1. Refund_SSSR
        Refund_SSSR 8 May 2013 07: 46 New
        +1
        The main thing is not to let fountains laughing
    2. Ruslan67
      Ruslan67 8 May 2013 08: 19 New
      +3
      I don’t know what will happen next, but I looked at the number of minuses what It seems that a couple of liberals went to wash themselves after a night spent in hot f .. fie DISCUSSIONS !! in the course of reading and minusanula wassat Well, to each his own fool
  • demon ada
    demon ada 8 May 2013 07: 20 New
    +6
    Prepare for Syria ?????
    The time has come .
  • svp67
    svp67 8 May 2013 07: 21 New
    +2
    That is, Russia is preparing to more actively influence the development of events outside its borders. This is good, it is better to extinguish the "nasty" in the bud than to expect when it gains strength and falls on us ...
  • fenix57
    fenix57 8 May 2013 07: 38 New
    0
    As in ANY TROOPS, "BONE" must be specialists!
    Quote: demon ada
    Prepare for Syria ?????
    The time has come .

    There, everything must be eaten .... hi
  • waisson
    waisson 8 May 2013 07: 57 New
    0
    what do you rustle earlier in peacekeepers, scored in random order from all units of the Airborne Forces, sent to Ryazan where natural selection took place for several months, as well as medical examination and final exams. a full-time staffed unit. all countries are sent to the peacekeepers of the Airborne Forces. I didn’t see the battalion of seals or the police, but the tank battalion or the helicopter regiment, but this is different as the unitary international police
  • click80
    click80 8 May 2013 08: 00 New
    +3
    It is high time. Particularly pleased that the first will be 31 ATSBR, in which I had the honor to serve.
  • Ragnarek
    Ragnarek 8 May 2013 08: 05 New
    +1
    You can also paint a dove on Topol and call it "Peacemaker" in a foreign manner
  • JonnyT
    JonnyT 8 May 2013 08: 06 New
    +1
    Che again, someone else's shit will have to be removed ????
    The USA shit, and our peacekeepers will go ???
    It’s time for peacekeepers near the White House in Washington to be trampled - there are such undemocratic guys in suits sitting there
  • APASUS
    APASUS 8 May 2013 08: 08 New
    +1
    I wonder why transfer to the peacekeepers of the paratroopers?
    At their core, peacekeepers are observers, and the maximum that they can fulfill is the function of the police.
  • kagorta
    kagorta 8 May 2013 08: 08 New
    0
    Everyone has read about peacekeeping, but this is a phrase to avert eyes. The main thing is actions within the framework of the CSTO. And this is not to breed the warring parties, but to fight.
  • shinobi
    shinobi 8 May 2013 08: 17 New
    0
    They were going to get in somewhere, to indicate the presence and not the fact that in Syria, so to speak. It seems that somewhere something is brewing, it’s not possible to be near and away.
  • Ruslan_F38
    Ruslan_F38 8 May 2013 09: 48 New
    0
    It's time, especially considering the events in the Middle East!
  • Suhov
    Suhov 8 May 2013 09: 52 New
    +1
    By September of this year, the Airborne Forces will be created peacekeeping divisions

    Everything is good, but the name confuses:
    Peacekeepers, somehow imperceptibly, now they began to call those who around the world that they want to do something.
    wassat
  • antiaircrafter
    antiaircrafter 8 May 2013 10: 20 New
    +2
    Maybe under the cover of readiness for peacekeeping they simply secretly increase their combat readiness?
    If we have all the parts of constant readiness, now there will be parts of super-constant readiness wink
  • vitas
    vitas 8 May 2013 11: 20 New
    0
    You need to dress all the paratroopers like that !!!!!
  • kudwar68
    kudwar68 8 May 2013 11: 40 New
    +2
    The Airborne Forces were almost always the first peacekeepers in all the hot spots of the former USSR, and the fact that they are now creating on the basis of the landing brigades is generally interesting. For what...?
  • biglow
    biglow 8 May 2013 14: 44 New
    0
    peacekeeping units airborne sounds good good
  • Bashkaus
    Bashkaus 8 May 2013 19: 55 New
    0
    In general, there is already not even hidden preparation for the use of military units outside the Russian Federation.
    I suspect that the Furious is stirring up something.
    By June 1st, airborne peacekeepers will be ready, just think about it, operational highly trained units capable of taking key places in a matter of hours where far beyond the borders of the Russian Federation, with motorized rifles and marines this topic will not work.
    At the same time, we see that the Mediterranean squadron has been re-formed, by coincidence, now somewhere in the Indian Ocean is our Varangian, who, if something happens, will quickly reach Tartus
    In short, events are gaining momentum.
    I suspect that the tactics of awakening the Russian Federation are awakening as in Ossetia, Assad’s task is to hold out for several hours before the arrival of our troops, and then step aside and nervously smoke bamboo, while two adult uncles will agree on the concepts of the future fate of humanity ...
  • MRomanovich
    MRomanovich 8 May 2013 20: 01 New
    +1
    the appearance of peacekeepers-paratroopers is not just the creation of the next unit, it is more likely a statement, plus a clear hint for all the dirty tricks who now have to think and weigh their decisions for many times.