Pakistan Air Force Command openly declares its desire to develop cooperation with Russia - Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Air Force

49
In Pakistan, with great respect for the Russian military equipment. This opinion was expressed today in an interview with the correspondent. ITAR-TASS Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force of the Russian Federation, Lieutenant-General Viktor Bondarev. The Russian general visited the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on a working visit at the invitation of the Air Force commander of that country.



"The Russian aircraft, delivered to Pakistan, mainly the Mi-17 military transport helicopters, continue to successfully accomplish their tasks in full," Bondarev said. According to him, the Pakistani side appreciated all the advantages of Russian aircraft and helicopters. "Pakistanis are well aware of the situation, they have studied all the possibilities of our aircraft," he said. The commander also expressed confidence that "the issue of its acquisition by Pakistan will be further developed."

Pakistan represents a huge and promising market, Bondarev added. The delegation of this state plans to visit the International Aerospace Salon in Zhukovsky MAKS-2013 in August of this year, the commander-in-chief reported. Also, according to him, there are prospects for a positive solution to the question of the supply to Pakistan of Russian jet engines RD-93, which are equipped with JF-17 - the fighter of the Air Force of this South Asian country (in the picture).

"Representatives of the command of the Pakistani Air Force openly declare their desire to develop cooperation with Russia,” said Viktor Bondarev. “The Pakistanis are hoping for Russian military equipment, as well as for our assistance in training Air Force officers.” The commander noted that in the near future the study of the possibility of training Pakistani cadets in Russia, and vice versa, will begin. There will also be considered the prospect of internships for Russian and Pakistani officers in military schools of the two countries.

"Pakistanis have already invited us to participate as observers in the flight maneuvers held here," Bondarev added. "We are also going to invite our Pakistani colleagues to our command-staff and flight tactical exercises," he added.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    April 25 2013 06: 18
    All is good of course request . It remains to find out what Indians think about this.
    1. +11
      April 25 2013 06: 33
      they want to develop something, but the main client and ally is India, therefore, in addition to insignificant systems such as MI-17 helicopters and engines, there is no need to wait for deliveries of more serious systems

      pictured new MI-17 helicopters for the army of Pakistan
      1. +13
        April 25 2013 06: 42
        Quote: Rustam
        but the main client and ally is India

        I believe that our army is the main ally. Our poor army will not be our ally. All of this is sad.
    2. +25
      April 25 2013 06: 40
      And what do Russians think when Indians flood tenders in favor of NATO technology ??
      Here we can say only one thing: We should more often hint to our Hindu partners that if they want to cooperate, then we don’t need to poke us in the mud, so where it is not necessary, otherwise we can make concessions to Pakistan.
      1. StolzSS
        +5
        April 25 2013 06: 55
        I think the Russians think it would be necessary to look after Pakistan. And the Indians will be told they say that it’s profitable for you yourself that our officers would keep an eye on your neighbor. And the fact that the Indians don’t like that we sell dviglo for fighters, so we will also sell it to you instantly 35) Moreover, it doesn’t stick with rafals because the Indians of technology and even different buns from the Franks wanted to get together, but it’s kind of not growing together ... So we’ll wait We will see how it will spin up. This is a difficult Eastern delicate matter ....
      2. 0
        April 25 2013 07: 56
        And what do Russians think about Pakistan in general? Or money doesn’t smell?
      3. +1
        April 25 2013 07: 59
        Whoever wants to return to the USSR can be reminded of who is behind the thousands of deaths of Soviet troops in Afghanistan? Who trained the Mujahideen in their camps, supplied them with weapons? Or war is war, and business is business?
        1. +5
          April 25 2013 08: 08
          Yes, everything from the filing of the United States came from Pakistan. But is China's role in that war really much smaller than Pakistan? What about Iran? And nothing, we are trading with might and main.
        2. 0
          April 25 2013 09: 20
          State Department? O_o
          And I didn’t say anything about the United States, I mean Pakistan.
          1. +1
            April 25 2013 09: 41
            And I didn't write to you either. And the fact that the United States was helping Pakistan with might and main to "help" the Afghan spirits is an open secret.
            1. -1
              April 25 2013 10: 41
              See carefully where the comment is addressed.
        3. +2
          April 25 2013 11: 21
          Remember the Germans, and then the Poles.
      4. 0
        April 25 2013 10: 30
        Hindus fill up the tender? Lost, behave normally. No need to fall into crying Yaroslavna like the British.
    3. +4
      April 25 2013 08: 17
      After the US withdraws from Afghanistan, the latter will again hang on us, so it’s nice to make friendship with Pakistan. It was this factor that did not allow for more successful control of Afghanistan in the Afghan war.
      Hindus are already armed against Pakistan, it is time to restore balance, or China and the USA will restore it.
    4. +1
      April 25 2013 09: 00
      Quote: kagorta
      ... All this is good, of course. It remains to find out what Indians think about this ...

      They probably think that they bought American "turntables" in vain, it was necessary not to anger the Russians and buy the Mil and Kamov helicopters.
    5. +3
      April 25 2013 10: 23
      Hindus do not want to buy Migi, so why not shake off their packs. IMHO this would have brought a few migrants out of the crisis.
    6. Che
      Che
      0
      April 27 2013 08: 44
      Quote: kagorta
      All is good of course request . It remains to find out what Indians think about this.

      It is interesting that amers think about this, yes.
    7. 0
      April 28 2013 10: 56
      Quote: kagorta
      It remains to find out what Indians think about this.

      And no one does not think that this is an attempt by our side to remind India about who is who, but lately it has begun to refuse to conclude contracts with us a lot ....
    8. 0
      1 May 2013 12: 31
      and the Indians do not think they came and checked. realized that everything is serious
  2. OTAKE
    +12
    April 25 2013 06: 18
    At the confrontation between India and Pakistan, Russia can very well heat the money, that’s the beast himself flees to the catcher, now they will trample contracts from Pakistan, one wonders where the Paks get so much money for weapons? It seems that the country is not very rich
    1. 0
      April 25 2013 06: 30
      Quote: OTAKE
      At the confrontation between India and Pakistan, Russia can heat money very well

      and maybe lose contracts in India. I think the Indians will not really like Russian-Pakistani military cooperation.
      1. OTAKE
        +8
        April 25 2013 06: 52
        Quote: self-propelled
        Quote: OTAKE
        At the confrontation between India and Pakistan, Russia can heat money very well

        and maybe lose contracts in India. I think the Indians will not really like Russian-Pakistani military cooperation.

        Hindus also buy a lot of weapons in the West, and recent tenders are proof of this, so I think no one will be offended, especially if the Pakistanis pay in foreign currency rather than on credit
        1. +3
          April 25 2013 07: 24
          Quote: OTAKE
          Quote: self-propelled
          Quote: OTAKE
          At the confrontation between India and Pakistan, Russia can heat money very well

          and maybe lose contracts in India. I think the Indians will not really like Russian-Pakistani military cooperation.

          Hindus also buy a lot of weapons in the West, and recent tenders are proof of this, so I think no one will be offended, especially if the Pakistanis pay in foreign currency rather than on credit


          So Paki still cooperate with China on defense, India in this regard is more decent than China.
          1. Gemar
            +2
            April 25 2013 09: 16
            Quote: Speckled32
            So Paki still cooperate with China

            That's it! +++ drinks
            In general, I think that all the technologies that will get to Pakistan will be transferred to the PRC by the latter "out of friendship." So, apart from the RD-93, it is not recommended to sell anything to Pakistan, especially the MiG-35 (the PRC borrows technology from it for the J-31), the Su-35 (all avionics will move to the J-20) and 117 engines (China will copy them and will begin to put on the whole family of fakes Sukhoi + J-20).
      2. +2
        April 25 2013 07: 01
        nothing to lose there all the military equipment on ours tied
    2. +9
      April 25 2013 07: 42
      Greetings, OK! And many do so. Business is business. The United States, for example, supplies weapons to both Arabs and Israel. And Russia, in other cases, is not particularly picky: they supply Azerbaijan and Armenia, Peru and Ecuador. Yes, and the Indians do not really favor you lately. So take it while they give ..
      1. OTAKE
        +2
        April 25 2013 09: 13
        Quote: xetai9977
        Greetings, OK! And many do so. Business is business. The United States, for example, supplies weapons to both Arabs and Israel. And Russia, in other cases, is not particularly picky: they supply Azerbaijan and Armenia, Peru and Ecuador. Yes, and the Indians do not really favor you lately. So take it while they give ..

        Hello Rauf. Regarding the deliveries to Israel and the Arabs, I have just delivered weapons to Egypt and Israel as military aid for $ 2 billion, according to the Camp David Agreement, and the rest are purely buying for their money, the same Saudis, Emirates and the like Qatari. The UAE, for example, also buys the same BMP tornadoes from Russia, etc.
      2. Rioter
        0
        April 25 2013 10: 22
        Not really. The states supply weapons only to the "correct" Arabs who are not at war with Israel and have no desire to fight anymore. And to those who have not yet fought (Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon) the United States does not sell anything. The clashes of the Arabian monarchies and Israel were not and were not expected.
        1. OTAKE
          +1
          April 25 2013 11: 47
          Quote: Rioter
          Not really. The states supply weapons only to the "correct" Arabs who are not at war with Israel and have no desire to fight anymore. And to those who have not yet fought (Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon) the United States does not sell anything. The clashes of the Arabian monarchies and Israel were not and were not expected.

          Well, of course, they are arming for the sake of arming. Nobody is especially ready to fight seriously with Israel.
    3. +1
      April 25 2013 09: 32
      so as not to become a beggar like Afghanistan, the army should be kept in order ...
  3. +1
    April 25 2013 06: 19
    So it is necessary, to push more and more Americans out of the market. The main thing now is that the desire develops into real contracts, good luck in your endeavors!
    1. +3
      April 25 2013 06: 44
      Quote: Romn
      oust Americans more and more from the market

      At the moment, this is not realistic, and the best advertisement for our weapons is to provide their army in full abundance.
  4. +6
    April 25 2013 06: 26
    India's "subtle" hint - ... how about the 35s?
  5. 0
    April 25 2013 06: 50
    I believe that there is no difference to whom to sell if it is profitable from a commercial perspective, if only they would not turn against us. And India and Pakistan, and so fought against each other in most cases with our weapons.
  6. pinecone
    +2
    April 25 2013 07: 04
    One can see Pakistan’s desire to reduce its dependence on supplies of military equipment from China.
    1. +4
      April 25 2013 08: 20
      There is a desire to replace counterfeit products with the original.
  7. vladsolo56
    0
    April 25 2013 07: 12
    Cooperation in the military sphere with Pakistan will lead to a deterioration in relations with India, a strange policy? And then we wonder why India is increasingly looking to the West.
    1. +2
      April 25 2013 07: 35
      Quote: vladsolo56
      ... Cooperation in the military sphere with Pakistan will lead to a deterioration in relations with India, a strange policy? And then we wonder why India is increasingly looking to the West ...

      Let the Indians think what they want, the light has not converged on them in the region, or even recently they have become picky, they want to look at the West at the same time, let them look, squint only work ..
      There, in the region, by the way, there is China.
    2. +1
      April 25 2013 08: 09
      She even looks there without it.
  8. +4
    April 25 2013 07: 20
    Such a complex ally as Pakistan ........ oh well fuck ..!
    Better to deal with more predictable countries! Not having such a controversial religious situation inside the country. A country that rushes from China to the United States and itself resembles a barrel of gunpowder!
    They can buy a little, but they can quite quarrel us with India!
  9. +3
    April 25 2013 07: 24
    ... The Pakistan Air Force command openly declares its desire to develop cooperation with Russia - the commander of the Russian Air Force ...

    As if after such a statement it would not be "found out" with the help of the UN that Pakistan is an outcast country and the supply of weapons there is prohibited.
  10. 0
    April 25 2013 07: 24
    Quote: APASUS
    They can buy a little, but they can quite quarrel us with India!

    Right Maybe someone suggested ...
  11. +13
    April 25 2013 07: 47
    Quote: APASUS
    Better to deal with more predictable countries.

    While you will choose buyers, you will lose all customers. Arms trade is primarily a business. Those who are more faithful survive.
    1. 0
      April 25 2013 08: 12
      Well do not go too far. There will be something to offer worthwhile to buyers, and there will be trade. Another thing is that with packs you need to be more careful with the assortment. Some of the sold then may be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
    2. 0
      April 25 2013 10: 55
      I fully support politics by politics, and business by business. it would be nice if the Indians thought the same feel
    3. -1
      April 25 2013 18: 08
      Quote: xetai9977
      The arms trade is primarily a business. Those who are more cunning survive.

      That you just noticed is a business!
      The supply contract lasts for years and brings with it training, modernization, spare parts, maintenance and a political roof if you want !!
      And the winner is always the one who can provide a full range of services (why by the way are the Americans and the first on the market, although their weapons are very expensive)
      And not the one who doesn’t care who shoves! By the way, our neighbors sin.
    4. hermes
      +1
      April 28 2013 10: 51
      Exactly in the top ten!
  12. +2
    April 25 2013 08: 09
    "Also, according to him, there are prospects in a positive solution to the issue of deliveries to Pakistan of Russian jet engines RD-93, which is equipped with JF-17 - a fighter of the Air Force of this South Asian country (pictured)."
    Does he know that the Moscow Chernyshev Plant producing RD-93 is being closed?
  13. +1
    April 25 2013 08: 25
    The news is doubly good because if I’m not mistaken this is the former bourgeois market .... I wouldn’t spoil relations with India, although these comrades themselves are now increasingly looking to the west to buy their equipment
  14. +1
    April 25 2013 09: 23
    For thirty Pakistani shekels, spoiling the air of friendly India is simply mean. It’s not enough that they shot at our people and crap wherever they could.
  15. Krasnoyarsk
    +2
    April 25 2013 10: 20
    Hmm bargain, soon narrow-eyed and copy engines.
  16. MEWTWO
    +2
    April 25 2013 10: 36
    new drone by Lockheed Martin
  17. -2
    April 25 2013 11: 28
    Selling weapons to Pakistan, Russia will expand its influence in the region. And this region is oh so important right now in the light of the withdrawal of minke whales from Afghanistan.
    1. 0
      April 28 2013 20: 48
      Quote: Black Colonel
      Selling weapons to Pakistan, Russia will expand its influence in the region. And this region is oh so important right now in the light of the withdrawal of minke whales from Afghanistan.

      We imagine hemorrhoids on jo .. gain! In the face of the United States!
      They are the first to launch a boot in us ......... they say we support terrorism !!
  18. lilit.193
    0
    April 25 2013 14: 30
    He would have hopped this Pakistan to us, along with its Air Force and its command! Islamobad will not be of any use to us. He, just as he was our opponent in the region, will remain so. But relations with the Hindus and Bangladesh may spoil. They are not friends with Pakistan and may interpret this step not in our favor. And with China, too, they can go bad. Because China and Pakistan have long been friends and cooperate in the field of armaments, and we are climbing into the market that China itself claims to be. Here where not to throw only minuses.
    1. +1
      April 25 2013 14: 36
      The USSR supplied weapons to friends, "free of charge, that is, for free" (Owl from Winnie the Pooh). Right now there is no friendship, there is a coincidence of interests.
      1. lilit.193
        +1
        April 25 2013 15: 45
        Quote: Black Colonel
        Right now there is no friendship, there is a coincidence of interests.

        Then explain to me right now and where is our coincidence of interests with Pakistan? Or the divergence of these interests with the same India?
        1. lilit.193
          +2
          April 25 2013 18: 19
          In response, only a minus. But there is no explanation and most likely will not be.
        2. OTAKE
          +1
          April 26 2013 06: 26
          Quote: lilit.193
          Quote: Black Colonel
          Right now there is no friendship, there is a coincidence of interests.

          Then explain to me right now and where is our coincidence of interests with Pakistan? Or the divergence of these interests with the same India?

          Through Pakistan, you can influence the situation in Afghanistan, for example. It is India who has an interest in dealing with Russia, for it is being pumped up with weapons as opposed to China.
  19. hermes
    +1
    April 27 2013 14: 33
    They were friends with China?