"The Law of Vasilisa"
Recently, at a talk show dedicated to the public demand for a visa regime with the countries of Central Asia, already nicknamed the "Law of Vasilisa Galitsyna", I was unable to get my opponents to answer one fairly simple question. You keep saying that without the import of Central Asians, our economy will stop, I said. The monster who tore apart little Vasilisa worked, as we learned, as an advertising agent. To which category of "irreplaceable workers" should I equate him: to janitors or to nuclear physicists? Is an advertising agent a low-paid hard job that "Russians don't want to do"? Or is an advertising agent a super-complicated rare profession, for the sake of which it is natural and normal to "import brains"?We are deceived, deceived quite impudently. For a long time I have been observing, for example, the seizure of the minibus business. You will not see a compatriot in them while driving. Meanwhile, our "bombiles" complain that it is getting harder and harder to survive. Many of them would gladly transfer to minibuses. It is both more stable and more profitable, not to mention such a factor as the wear and tear of your own car. Who will call them? Who will let them?
In the spring, I admire the phenomenon brilliantly described by D. Zavolsky in the article "Shaitan-mower": the senseless and harmful to urban ecology cutting of grass by Central Asians in our yards.
Most of the work for migrants is simply imagined, taken from the ceiling.
Millions of people from Central Asia are imported into the country just like that, without the slightest need. At the same time, they can be drug addicts and drug dealers, they can have bunches of outlandish diseases unknown to us. This is not verified by anyone and does not disturb anyone. This is the reality, once again confirmed by the terrible case of Vasilisa Galitsyna.
Talk about the fact that the work of strikebreakers has never solved economic problems, about the fact that individual citizens-builders make money, and the main population suffers at the same time from an increase in crime - this is our wonderful yesterday. Part of the migrants, indeed, to all the detriment of us, continue to enrich the builders, but part (how big?) Does not even have this shaky justification for their presence.
The girl's death raises other questions as well. For example: what, in fact, is the Uzbek diaspora busy with now? Does she tear the shirt on her chest, does she scream that the monster "has neither nationality, nor religion"? But somehow not particularly, once she muttered something indistinctly in Tatarstan. And even five years ago, the scream would have been unimaginable. Now, thanks to the authorities for the migration policy, there are already too many of them to waste time on crocodile tears. A janitor in Moscow broke a boy's jaw for throwing a snowball. Do we understand or not that five years ago a janitor would have been more careful with a shovel? They feel like power. And they got rid of the janitor: he was lucky. The murderer and the maniac were not lucky, it is too expensive to excuse the maniac - for now. Wait: I think I said "maniac"?
Our psychiatrists are discussing a highly scientific debate, is pedophilia curable in principle? But they all, no doubt, agree that pedophilia is a deviation from the norm, a pathology. But this is in our world, the world of Christian genesis.
Not so long ago, the Internet was bypassed by another story about an Arab girl who died of injuries and blood loss on her wedding night. Nobody, of course, was punished. Also recently, I watched a TV show via the Internet in which a minor Arab "wife", with the support of a human rights activist, demanded a divorce. In Uzbekistan, there is less Internet - unfortunately for little "wives". There are places in the world where pedophilia is just a “variant of the norm”. Unfortunately for our population, a large part of the population of these places is moving to Russia. And after all, since our regulatory code does not match, visiting pedophiles are simply forced to kill, dismember and hide the bodies of their victims. We are still forced to hide.
I have no doubts that the examination recognizes this very Tashbaev as sane. He just behaved the way the invaders behave during the capture of cities.
What of the fact that the nature of the conduct of an aggressive war has changed, mutated under the conditions of the XNUMXst century? The war is going on, millions of hostile infidels invade the territory of the country every year. No assaults and sieges: the traitors themselves open the city gates for them. Vasilisa is a small victim of this war. If the visa regime does not pass, then the victim will not be the last one. That is, it will not be the last one in any case, even if the law is adopted tomorrow, and the day after tomorrow mass deportations will begin. This also has to be realized. The question of whether there will be victims is also our beautiful yesterday. Ours today: how many of them will there be?
Another lie reveals itself. How many times have we heard “demographics are falling, we need to give birth more”? If you raise, they say, more, and we will not carry the Uzbeks. The Galitsyn family has many children. It had seven children. Now there are six. In fact, no one is interested in the fact that Russians, in the reality that is being created today, give birth to a lot. In which case, their very conditions of being will "reduce" a little.
The adoption of the "law of Vasilisa Galitsyna" is a national security requirement. We must, we must do everything for it to be accepted.
Information