“We must stop saying one thing and doing another”: the head of the PRC accused the United States of hypocrisy

The United States pursues a policy based on duplicity. This was actually openly stated by the Chairman of the People's Republic of China (PRC), Xi Jinping, at a meeting with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. The American publication The Politico drew attention to the words of the Chinese leader.

During his meeting with Blinken, the Chinese leader said both countries should help each other, not harm each other. But the United States, according to Xi Jinping, is not honest in its policies.

We need to stop saying one thing and doing another.

- said the Chinese leader, criticizing the United States for its hypocritical policies.

Xi Jinping is dissatisfied with many actions of the American side. First, the United States officially views China as a potential adversary, and every year anti-Chinese rhetoric in Washington intensifies.

Secondly, the United States is trying to form a military-political alliance in the Asia-Pacific region, which could involve Japan, the Philippines and a number of other states. The anti-Chinese orientation of such an alliance is obvious.

Third, the United States continues to provide comprehensive support to Taiwan, including in the defense sector. At the same time, Washington has repeatedly stated in words that it adheres to the “one China” principle.

Finally, the American administration is trying to impede the rapid economic development of China, including by limiting the availability of a number of advanced technologies, as well as semiconductors, to Chinese companies. And recently, American politicians have begun to accuse China of not maintaining neutrality in the Ukrainian conflict, although the Western countries themselves did not observe any neutrality from the very beginning of hostilities, but openly took the side of the Kyiv regime.

Comments

[Thrifty]

Why did you smart guy even meet with this Blinkin? Also a policy of double standards!

[svp67]

Quote: Thrifty

Why did you smart guy even meet with this Blinkin?

Because China and the USA have VERY strong economic ties. And here you want it, you don’t want it, you have to somehow talk and come to an agreement.

[Victor Leningradets]

And here you want it, you don’t want it, you have to somehow talk and come to an agreement.

A food eater does not negotiate! The master's lackey arrived and whipped the slave.

[Montezuma]

Quote: Thrifty

Why did you smart guy even meet with this Blinkin? Also a policy of double standards!

Chairman Xi probably knows what he is doing. He won’t bend to the Americans, but he doesn’t need any aggravation of relations either. Almost seven hundred billion dollars in mutual trade turnover in 2023, the economy also plays a role in curbing emotions. But if the states become impudent, then China will simply be forced to take retaliatory measures.

[boriz]

Well, at least to determine the position out loud. China has finally chosen who he is with.
Otherwise it was not entirely clear.

[knn54]

...and think third.
They are not hypocrites, but “orphans” - no shame, no conscience.

[Lech from Android.]

Quote: Thrifty

Why did you smart guy even meet with this Blinkin? Also a policy of double standards!

China is connected with the United States economically, and Sinping cannot break off relations with the United States so easily.
Blinken understands this very well and will put all his might on Xi to break all relations with the Kremlin.
This is not the moment of truth yet.

[Ivan Ivanov]

It turns out that the United States can do this, even to the point of threatening its sovereignty, but China cannot. It's a one-way game.

[Ivan Ivanov_36]

The winner in such pressures is always the one who does not understand the consequences of his actions. But in the long run he always loses. The US sanctions policy is always self-torture.

[Egoza]

Quote: Lech from Android.

This is not the moment of truth yet.

Well, Comrade Xi at least spoke openly about it!

[Aerodrome]

Quote: Egoza

Quote: Lech from Android.

This is not the moment of truth yet.

Well, Comrade Xi at least spoke openly about it!

The dragon beats the eagle...

[Electrical]

China is connected with the United States economically, and Sinping cannot break off relations with the United States so easily.

It is not China that is connected to the United States, but the other way around. The United States produces nothing except weapons and cut paper. China will survive without the United States; it will still have the rest of the world. But the USA without China will be bare-assed. Especially if the Indians also organize dances with figs.

[Ivan Ivanov]

China itself needs to stop trying to convince the bastard with words and start doing something

[bath]

In diplomatic terms, this is not an attempt to convince someone, this is a characterization of the object, impatience, accusation.

[Arkady007]

Essentially nothing new. The USA did absolutely these actions in relation to the USSR and the Russian Federation.

[Ivan Ivanov]

And the answers we received were similar, everyone remembers how it ended

[Lech from Android.]

Quote: IvanIvanov

It turns out that the United States can do this, even to the point of threatening its sovereignty, but China cannot. It's a one-way game.

Yes... that's it for now.

[bone1]

Why did you meet with Blinkin? Why didn’t you send him to a known address?

[phrases]

It is absolutely necessary to get it into your head that any system consists of money and power, one feeds the other and vice versa. The population is a herd that needs to be sheared and occasionally fed, mainly with promises and propaganda in their favor. China does not stand out from this scheme at all, and it is very naive to expect that their authorities and capital will fit in for something other than their power and money. And chatter isn't worth a penny.

[evgen1221]

Well, if the Japanese were landed with patents for chips, then nothing will be able to land the Chinese because they themselves live from imports from there, and stop sending consumer goods and ayons to China, they will still have the whole world, but the West will not.

[alystan]

“We must stop saying one thing and doing another”: the head of the PRC accused the United States of hypocrisy

The worst thing is that they imagine themselves to be the masters of the world and teach others how to live and behave.
And this is precisely their talking shop in relation to others.
It doesn’t seem to concern them and they do as they please.
This is why they need to be face-down in one place.

[Aurelio]

Bravo Xi Jinping. . quando ci vuole ci vuole ed è meglio farsi capire e parlar chiaro.

[tralflot1832]

The negotiations took place in an honest, frank atmosphere. Blinkin, did you expect something else? Yelen poured poison abundantly on the ground for negotiations. Why does the West always blather when it flies from the PRC, they are like dogs barking from a safe distance. If you have a stick in your hands, of course .

[Alex777]

Chinese liaison commented:

1. The States have requested to limit the supply of anything from China to Russia. The response is a complete refusal, the supplies do not violate the laws of the two countries and are not subject to UN sanctions, and your American restrictions may only apply to transactions with the United States.

2. Dual-use products can be sold because there is no evidence that all of them are used in war. It’s elementary - if out of a thousand “night lights” three were bought by hunters, then this is not a supply for the army, but a household device for hunting, no problem. Otherwise, everyone needs to be sanctioned for everything, for example, Intel and Microsoft for using a laptop in war.

3. Blinken was blown away during the discussion and said that Europe can only worsen relations with you, China, because you support the threat to it (the American concept, “Europe must pay for the war against Russia, otherwise Russia sleeps and sees how If you want to capture Andorra, it’s not we who are ordering you to pay for our American weapons, but you yourself want”) - to which China said that Europe would worsen relations with China only under the influence of the United States, and that it needs to become a subject of world politics. And direct communication with European countries - and not with a branch of the State Department called Eurostructures - will continue.

4. There was a discussion on the South China Sea. By zero - China continues to allow civilian ships and warships of other countries to pass, but only when the latter notify about their route through the PRC’s foreign waters, the United States continues and will continue to lie “China has completely blocked the entire South China Sea, this is a violation of Freedom of Navigation , stupid commies want to put a fence around the sea, oh what is being done, little women.” The situation with the Philippines is unstable and literally on the edge - the Philippines is still inventing which reefs and islands are “originally Philippine”, spitting on all maps and treaties, the United States will fit in if necessary. In the event of any conflict with the victims, the continuation can also be anything.

5. Blinken demanded not to organize joint exercises with Russia and demonstration passages of the Russian and Chinese fleets between the Japanese islands. This increases tension, plus samurai have enuresis. Was sent, countries can carry out whatever they want in international waters, warning others in advance.

6. In the finale, Blinken decided to threaten that if China does not take measures against the Russian Federation (i.e. does not introduce its own restrictions), then the United States will do so against China. The answer I received was that any illegal actions would receive a comparable response.

7. Tiktok! I almost forgot the main thing, because the powerful hegemon has been fighting the application for idiots for seven years. So, if TikTok is squeezed out, and the key thing in the squeeze is the recommendation algorithm, then China reserves the right to retaliate by expropriating American IP and intellectual property. What can open such a Pandora's box that just ah. So the Final Fight with Tiktok, which was postponed until this spring, may still change a lot. Elections are in the fall, the dynamics of events are high.

[tralflot1832]

Alex 777. I studied the worthy response of the People's Republic of China. You know very well that shale oil comes with associated gas, and this is LNG. The USA is 1st in LNG exports. China is 1st in imports. Here we have something to work on. The USA has reached the ceiling in oil production at 13,4 million barrels per day, oil and gas workers howled from an overabundance of gas. I read on one Western resource. Mexico reduced oil exports to the United States, from 300-400 barrels per day, redirecting oil to its refineries. And then the miracle - Mexico's oil refinery suddenly there was a fire, like a technological accident, oil went to the USA. I don’t think this is a coincidence.

[Alex777]

Quote: tralflot1832

Mexico reduced oil exports to the United States, redirecting oil to its refineries by 300-400 barrels per day. And then, miraculously, Mexican refineries suddenly burst into flames, like technological accidents, and oil went to the USA. I don't think this is a coincidence.

100%

[Argon]

although the Western countries themselves did not observe any neutrality from the very beginning of hostilities, but openly took the side of the Kyiv regime.

what did I just read? Which one did you take? They planned and sponsored the Maidan! They pumped up and pumped up the Reich! They pushed Ukraine into war! The fact that GDP is ahead by several days or weeks does not mean that the United States only supports the Ukrainian Reich! The United States is directly to blame for the events in Ukraine since the 90s.

[Romanenko]

“We need to stop saying one thing and doing another”

Alas, this is the most important principle of Anglo-Saxonism and Judaism, that one stems from the other.
Perhaps we should just stop listening to them and declare a planetary, total vote of no confidence.
They cannot help but lie, this is the essence of their well-being and the meaning of their existence.