Survey data: more than half of Russians support the restoration of the death penalty

42
Survey data: more than half of Russians support the restoration of the death penalty

After the bloody terrorist attack in Krasnogorsk near Moscow, which, according to the latest data, killed 145 people and injured at least 550, the topic of lifting the moratorium on the death penalty as the highest punishment for particularly serious crimes is again being actively discussed in Russian society. Although the official position of the country's leadership and the majority of legislators remains the same, it is stated that at least there is no need to rush into this, many citizens of the Russian Federation insist on returning the relevant articles to the Criminal Code.

At the beginning of April, the Russian marketing agency Russian Field conducted a nationwide sociological survey using telephone calls on the topic of returning the death penalty to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Based on its results, it turned out that more than half of the respondents (53%) support this decision. 39 percent of Russians would not support the return of the death penalty. Another seven percent found it difficult to answer. A total of 1631 respondents were surveyed, the maximum error size with a 95% probability does not exceed 2,45%.





At the same time, the return of capital punishment through forced deprivation of life is most advocated by residents of small towns and rural settlements; men predominate among them. There is a high proportion of those who support the restoration of this punishment among active users of social networks and instant messengers. By age group, the least supporters of the death penalty are among young people 18–29 years old, the share of which is 60 percent. Among respondents over 60 years of age, 30% are against the death penalty, 63%, on the contrary, support its restoration. Notably, support for executions declines as monthly family income increases.

Most often, respondents believe that the death penalty is acceptable for pedophilia (57%), murder (56%) and terrorism (46%). Somewhat less frequently, respondents support the death penalty for rape (23%), serial murder (22%), theft and corruption (13%), high treason, espionage and desertion (13%).

Women are significantly more likely to support the introduction of the death penalty for pedophilia and murder, and men – for terrorism. The share of supporters of execution for murder increases from younger to older groups, and the share of supporters of execution for pedophilia is significantly higher in the group of 30-44 years old. From the less wealthy to the more wealthy, support for the introduction of execution for pedophilia increases, but support for execution for murder decreases. Respondents with higher education support the idea of ​​execution for pedophilia and terrorism more often than respondents without higher education, and both groups support the idea of ​​execution for murder equally often.



The death penalty in the Russian Federation as capital punishment ceased to operate on April 16, 1997 by decision of the Constitutional Court of Russia. Particularly serious crimes are punishable by life imprisonment, a decision on pardon for which can only be made by the president. At the same time, the norm on the death penalty remained in national legislation, which has less legal force than the Constitution. To return this type of punishment, a change in the country's Basic Law is required. Moreover, even in this case, those responsible for the terrorist attack in Crocus City Hall cannot be sentenced to death, since the law does not have retroactive effect.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    April 26 2024 11: 41
    Survey data: more than half of Russians support the restoration of the death penalty

    And what's the use?
    How many Russian citizens supported the pension reform? And they did it as the bourgeoisie needed...
    1. -6
      April 26 2024 11: 47
      Quote: ROSS 42
      How many Russian citizens supported the pension reform?

      What does pension reform have to do with the death penalty?
      As always, any reason to prick the authorities. Then let's talk about the childlessness tax.
      1. +7
        April 26 2024 11: 51
        Quote: Irokez
        What does pension reform have to do with the death penalty?

        Despite the fact that the opinion of the people in our country does not decide anything!!!
        Be it pension reform, be it the death penalty for certain types of crimes, be it the minimum wage, be it the living wage...
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +1
            April 26 2024 13: 54
            The essence of the problem of reinstating the death penalty in Russia is not fully revealed by the data of this opinion poll. Namely.

            It does not, as always, touch on the interethnic side, from where the roots of the evil of this problem in our country grow.

            I would like to know which Russians by nationality are for or against the death penalty and why?

            I would also like to know Over the last decade, how many Russians have actually become in Russia from foreign migrants from the CIS countries with a completely different national culture, labor qualifications, radical nationalism and Russophobia?
            After all, this circumstance definitely and MANDATORY influences the indicators of this opinion poll? How does it affect - in which direction?

            Otherwise, the results of this opinion poll reek of a liberal-pro-Western opinion poll conducted by sociologists using Western methodologies.

            There can be no trust in the results of such a “crude” - semi-scientific, scientifically unfounded - survey as a guide to action! And they will be contested in society - manipulatively blurred by actors (stakeholders-beneficiaries) - from different sides constantly!
            Those. There will be no unity in society in a multinational country, but this unity must be overwhelmingly in order to protect the national security of Russia!
            Otherwise, again the article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “On the death penalty” will end up in practice, just like Art. 282 of the Criminal Code only purely so-called. "Russian" article on the destruction of civil rights only of the Russian population of Russia!
            1. 0
              April 26 2024 14: 56
              Quote: Tatiana
              The essence of the problem of reinstating the death penalty in Russia is not fully revealed by the data of this opinion poll.

              The death penalty provides some justice for murderers and other defendants in serious crimes.
              After this there will be no amnesty, as happened with the defendants in the Tsapkov gang case...
          2. 0
            April 26 2024 14: 53
            Quote: Irokez
            You're a hardened commie

            I am not a born (not hardened) communist, but socialist ideas are more pleasant to me than wild speculation under the patronage of the state.
            Moreover, I do not vote for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and will not vote for the party of opportunists.
            At present, there is no leader and guide in the country that could unite Russian society with its program and ideas.
        2. -6
          April 26 2024 12: 48
          In this and many other cases, the people cannot understand the problems or reasons. The death penalty is not a panacea for crime, this has long been proven. The panacea may be the inevitability of punishment! And here we have problems! Errors in court proceedings are also possible. One innocent soul is not worth a hundred executed criminals.
      2. +8
        April 26 2024 12: 04
        The death penalty needs to be restored.
        Terrorists, serial killers, pedophiles, and corrupt officials deserve to be executed.
        Corrupt officials should be executed publicly, like in China. What has already come to this: ministers and their deputies are plundering the country. am
        1. +12
          April 26 2024 12: 10
          Quote: Bearded
          Corrupt officials should be executed publicly, like in China. What has already come to this: ministers and their deputies are plundering the country.

          First, parliamentary immunity must be abolished, otherwise there is no one to execute. winked
        2. -6
          April 26 2024 12: 28
          The death penalty needs to be restored.
          This punishment is not for the Russian Federation. In a place with terrorists who filmed their crimes, those who confessed to everything with a bag on their head or with a foreign object in the wrong place, the mentally ill who do not understand what is being hanged on them, etc. will go to the scaffold.
        3. 0
          April 26 2024 12: 50
          If they put you in prison for something you didn’t do and execute you, and in a few years you will be acquitted, will this make it easier for you and your family? Or are you insured against the mistakes of our intelligence services?
          1. +2
            April 26 2024 12: 58
            I won't be jailed.
            They will understand and forgive me because I am a Bearded Man. laughing lol wassat drinks good
            But seriously: you don’t need to deal with all sorts of bullshit (terrorism, extremism, pedophilia, serial murders, bribery, communication with all sorts of creepy people).
            There is no punishment without guilt. (C) Gleb Zheglov. good
            I work in the ministry. If a tool is missing at work, I bring it from home. I didn't steal a nail from work. The men at the front perform great feats, but in the rear I work overtime at the risk of my life.
            1. +1
              April 26 2024 13: 03
              I think you live in a different reality. If it were possible to say with one hundred percent certainty that someone is guilty, I am for the death penalty! But no one is immune from mistakes and setups! Don't hesitate!
              1. +4
                April 26 2024 13: 28
                Are the Burbacks who carried out the terrorist attack in Crocus guilty of mass murder of people? Not enough evidence? Is video recording of murders not enough?
                Timur and his team, who plundered the Defense Ministry during the Northern Military District, when the men at the front were advancing through minefields under drone attacks, are they guilty? Where does the team get such mansions and premium cars? And during mobilization, those mobilized bought uniforms at their own expense.
      3. +8
        April 26 2024 12: 36
        Quote: Irokez
        What does pension reform have to do with the death penalty?

        Looks like you just didn't understand
        The pension reform was cited simply as an example of the fact that the opinion of the people never played a decisive role in the adoption any solutions
        Any solution at all
        1. -4
          April 26 2024 13: 18
          Quote from sdivt
          the opinion of the people has never played a decisive role

          The opinion of the people has no legal power in ordinary polls. Moreover, it is important who conducts the survey, and there you can screw up anything. And the opinion of the people can fluctuate greatly due to emotions, and on this wave hotheads can introduce or repeal laws or regulations for their own benefit, which is why there is a Constitution, the Criminal Code and other normative documents written with a sober head and without emotions. And there are critics who consider themselves ideal, and the government chosen by the people as enemies, and therefore throw poop at any opportunity (they take shit into their mouth and spit).
          1. +2
            April 26 2024 15: 01
            Quote: Irokez
            The opinion of the people has no legal power in ordinary polls.

            This is true, which is why the results of the referendum on preserving the USSR were ignored...
            It remains to clarify how an ordinary question differs from a referendum and voting on issues...
  2. +13
    April 26 2024 11: 43
    Terrorists, fascists, rapists, embezzlers, traitors to the motherland, those who poison our children with drugs. definitely needs to be executed!
  3. +6
    April 26 2024 11: 45
    Well, firstly, there is clearly more support for the death penalty than is indicated here, and secondly, the Kremlin will deign to accept the opinion of the population as instructions for action and restore the death penalty??? Ha ha ha!!!!!
  4. +4
    April 26 2024 11: 46
    Notably, support for executions declines as monthly family income increases.
    . What is this talking about?
    One can guess/assume that wealth, wealth, was acquired through criminal means!
    It's logical.
    About the fact that the rich... are kinder, but you shouldn’t stutter so as not to anger the people.
  5. +2
    April 26 2024 11: 47
    The name of the agency is English. Is it a foreign agent? The results are too slippery and not convincing. The foreign order is felt.
  6. +3
    April 26 2024 11: 52
    "Russian marketing agency Russian Field" and do they know Russian well? Couldn't you come up with a name in Russian? Or are these foreign agents not yet registered?
    But what about the UAZ Patriot? couldn't write in Russian lol one word, patriot, which in this context has nothing patriotic.
  7. +2
    April 26 2024 11: 56
    You can test it on Timur and his team right now
    1. +4
      April 26 2024 12: 08
      You can test it on Timur and his team. am good
      The law has no retroactive effect?
      What about the retirement age and zeroing?
      The law - whatever the drawbar, where it turned - that's where it came out.
      Give Tereshkova a task: she will do everything in a week.
      1. 0
        April 26 2024 12: 23
        Quote: Bearded
        Give Tereshkova a task: she will do everything in a week.

        Don’t be naive, she only voices (reads) what they give her, everything is done and decided by others hi
        1. +2
          April 26 2024 12: 47
          Quote: Anatol Klim
          Don't be naive, she only voices (reads) ... others decide

          Why do you think the topic of the return of capital punishment suddenly began to emerge in many media (including VO, including), almost simultaneously? All these polls? Editors and authors, unrelated to each other, came up with the same idea at the same time?
          Amazing synchronicity, don't you think?
          I am sure that what you said about Tereshkova also applies to these publications
          In other words, the necessary “public opinion” is being formed in the country, unobtrusively and gradually.
          One can only guess who acts as conductors...
  8. +6
    April 26 2024 11: 58
    Interestingly, simple murder is 56%, and serial murder - 22% - i.e. By this logic, is it better to kill serially? belay recourse
  9. +6
    April 26 2024 11: 58
    With our level of corruption and law enforcement system, I would be afraid to introduce the death penalty.

    - Do you trust the police?
    - No.
    - Do you trust the court?
    - No.
    - Do you want to bring back the death penalty?
    - YES!
  10. 0
    April 26 2024 11: 59
    But I am against the death penalty, for rapists, maniacs, terrorists, etc., who qualify as execution, we need to create conditions for them that are simply unbearable and so that everyone can see the pain and despair of these nonhumans; by executing them we will only do a service, especially for the Islamists. There is also a ban on all human rights organizations.
    Will we support it? Yes, we will! But his relatives will know that he is suffering and will suffer for a long time!! Avoid suicide attempts! This is the punishment I think, and some idiots will wonder whether it is necessary to create something crazy.
    1. -2
      April 26 2024 12: 05
      Quote: salat
      But I am against the death penalty for rapists, maniacs, terrorists

      It is logical that instead of the death penalty they would be subject to experiments in closed clinics or research institutes - they deserve it.
    2. +3
      April 26 2024 12: 14
      I don't know, this is already called sadism, as for me. What you are writing about. The meaning of punishment should be either re-education or elimination of the problem.
      All this reasoning in the spirit of the Marquis De Sade with the rapture of the torment of the tormentors is already nonsense and irrational. A rabid dog is not tormented - it is eliminated so that it does not bite anyone else.

      Regarding the estimated penalty - rather against than for. But not by much.
      There are a lot of arguments here - the main argument “For” is that there is no benefit to anyone from the repentance of some serial cannibal pedophile. Keeping him alive for reasons of moralism is the same nonsense as savoring how he continues to go crazy in captivity. Some people are not just incorrigible - there is NO point in correcting them, they have already brought a cartload of dirt and pain into this world, this is their essence.
      Here you can only cut them off from society, treating this in a purely practical manner.
      The arguments “against” are not arguments of morality spherical in a vacuum, but arguments about the peculiarities of law enforcement. If there should be an insurance policy, it should be used in EXTREMELY limited and EXTREMELY unambiguously interpreted cases of DIRECT damage to the lives and health of people. That is, so that there are no “terrorists” with paper cups or angry letter writers, no matter what nasty things they write about the authorities, no matter what crazy things they call for.
      There is absolutely no guarantee that the practice of using the IC will not soon slide into reprisals against the opposition or bloody performances “for the edification of society” - our current “tablets” are by no means granite.
      1. 0
        April 26 2024 13: 01
        Quote: Knell Wardenheart
        idk, this is already called sadism

        Well, how can it be? Sadism, to me, means inflicting pain and enjoying it; these are the kind of criminals who are sadists, doing evil for their own pleasure.
        Quote: Knell Wardenheart
        The point of punishment should be either re-education or elimination of the problem.

        Well, they punish for many things and for all sorts of purposes. It seems to me that punishment is like a response to a person for his actions, and re-educating him is a matter of the future, but first, punishment as in childhood in a corner with peas, a belt on the butt, labor or deprivation of something.
        In the case of a dangerous individual for society, it makes sense to support him for life by spending money. Here, too, an alternative and choice can be provided with any benefit for the state: as a test subject somewhere with a high probability of death (thus worthy of death), the most dangerous work with a fatal outcome, but with a chance to survive, and the most inhumane thing to do with such non-humans is how to make them robots (avatars) that can be sent anywhere, but with benefit.
    3. +1
      April 26 2024 18: 14
      You are partly right. But there is a nuance, in fact, yes, life sentence is more painful for the criminal, and death solves his problem faster. But for society, life imprisonment is lost from consciousness quite quickly, but execution is a more pronounced punishment (for society it causes a more pronounced awareness of the irreversibility of severe punishment for serious criminals, and even more so awareness of others like them, who will think three times about the possible desire to commit such a crime)
  11. man
    +4
    April 26 2024 12: 09
    Survey data: more than half of Russians support the restoration of the death penalty
    Wow, what a surprise! smile
    I remembered the words of Yuri Polyakov in one of his works: “The Soviet Criminal Code was very simple. Stole - imprisoned, killed - died!” laughing Hmm... in the USSR in general there was a lot of fair positive things...
  12. +6
    April 26 2024 12: 28
    More than half...
    Hmm... One half expects to execute the other?!
    SC is a double-edged sword.
    Do we fully trust the system in whose hands it will end up?..
    Do we trust the investigation, prosecutors and courts?!
    By the way... a imbalance has arisen: the investigation and the prosecutors are representatives of the prosecution.
    Although, the role of prosecutors is to monitor compliance with the law by EVERYONE (including investigators).
    And anyone can sew a suit. If only he were a good person... (c)
  13. -5
    April 26 2024 12: 35
    Among respondents over 60 years of age, 30% are against the death penalty, 63%, on the contrary, support its restoration.


    Well, naturally, the old farts are all for it. they have already outlived their usefulness, and after them - even a fire.
  14. -2
    April 26 2024 13: 00
    Yes, I’m not a “Russian”... I have a different passport..
    (I live in temporarily occupied territory)
    but I support the death penalty!
  15. +1
    April 26 2024 14: 05
    Unfortunately, the shell-shocked Gorbachevites in power will not be impressed. To do this, the Gorbachevites themselves must be changed.
  16. GRR
    +1
    April 26 2024 15: 47
    Against the restoration of the death penalty. No one will be better off from this.
  17. 0
    April 27 2024 13: 03
    In my opinion, the state, especially in its current form, benefits from the existence of a layer of criminal elements in the full spectrum. And as a result, one cannot be too frightened by all sorts of inevitabilities and death penalties.
  18. +1
    April 28 2024 10: 40
    Why break spears in vain? The VMSZ will not be restored, because it is not profitable at the top, high-ranking officials do not want their corridor to end with a wall at some point.
  19. +1
    April 30 2024 01: 47
    Our lawyers are up to something! The article in the Criminal Code remained, not crossed out. Its action has simply been suspended. And therefore, to lift this suspension, it is not necessary to change the Constitution!