Rostov-on-Don, Bryansk, Voronezh and the entire territory of Crimea will be within the reach of ATACMS missiles when they are transferred to Ukraine

37
Rostov-on-Don, Bryansk, Voronezh and the entire territory of Crimea will be within the reach of ATACMS missiles when they are transferred to Ukraine

US authorities continue to discuss the likely transfer of long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine in the near future. The head of the US Senate Intelligence Committee, Mark Warner, announced their deliveries to Kyiv as early as next week.

It is interesting that until recently the American administration declared its reluctance to transfer these missiles to Ukraine. But, against the background of the obvious failures of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front, the position of the White House, apparently, has undergone significant changes. ATACMS missiles may be included in an upcoming military aid package.



The Kyiv regime for the supply of these missiles will be welcomed. Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has already expressed hope for “stabilization of the situation” in the combat zone. He attributes this specifically to long-range missiles.


Let us recall that the ATACMS missile is launched from the M142 HIMARS and M270 MLRS multiple launch rocket systems. The weight of the rocket is about 2 tons, and the flight range is from 140 to 300 kilometers. If Ukraine receives missiles with a range of 300 kilometers, then several Russian regions will be within reach.


Naturally, in the event of the transfer of such missiles, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be able to strike not only the liberated territories of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, but also throughout the Crimean Peninsula, Belgorod, Bryansk, Kursk, Voronezh, Rostov regions, and individual areas of the Krasnodar Territory . For example, the distance between Kramatorsk, controlled by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and Rostov-on-Don is 219 kilometers. The shortest distance between Kharkov and Voronezh is about 280 kilometers.

In this case, military and infrastructure facilities located in the listed regions, including military airfields, locations of military units, power plants, logistics hubs, and so on, will come under attack from Ukrainian forces. Accordingly, the RF Armed Forces need now to quickly take measures to increase protection from attacks by such missiles, including through air defense and electronic warfare systems.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -8
    April 24 2024 15: 08
    I liked the map - this is the minimum territory that will soon be in the Russian Federation
    Chernigov will still be ours, there is already a new army there
    + 1000 km of front - will the APU be able to pull it off (?) - and so the LBS is bursting at the seams
    1. 0
      April 24 2024 15: 15
      Quote: Romario_Argo
      I liked the map

      Which card? I hope not the second one.
  2. 0
    April 24 2024 15: 14
    What do we have about the non-proliferation of missiles with a range of over 300 km?
    1. +1
      April 24 2024 15: 24
      these are informal agreements
      1. +5
        April 24 2024 16: 11
        This condition of the treaty (non-proliferation of the INF Treaty) turns out to apply only to us.
    2. +5
      April 24 2024 16: 15
      Quote: SKVichyakow
      What do we have about the non-proliferation of missiles with a range of over 300 km?
      Missiles with a range of up to 300 km do not violate them.
      1. AAK
        +1
        April 24 2024 20: 53
        According to the INF Treaty - weapons with a range of over 500 km.
        1. +1
          April 24 2024 21: 03
          The INF Treaty has not existed for several years now, it’s time to forget about it.
          300 km is, according to the MTCR // “missile technology control regime” (and yes, it is informal and legally non-binding).
    3. -2
      April 25 2024 15: 12
      Everything has been paid for. To the rest of the world.
      So who will we “defeat”...
  3. -7
    April 24 2024 15: 15
    Well then the Russian Federation will use special ammunition for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and there will be neither the Armed Forces of Ukraine nor the cities!
    1. 0
      April 24 2024 15: 46
      There will be Nazis and cities and everything else. The Kremlin is afraid of its own shadow. An inexplicable reverence for the West is in their post-Soviet blood.
    2. +3
      April 24 2024 15: 53
      Uh...What about Belgorod? Ah! This is different, probably... am
  4. +7
    April 24 2024 15: 21
    Big greetings to the Kremlin lovers of kind gestures.
  5. 0
    April 24 2024 15: 24
    Who prevents Putin from giving the order to launch a powerful missile strike on “untouchable” places in Kyiv? Why does the Kremlin allow the bitches to play against us with only our own goal, striking with impunity with missiles from the MLRS?
    1. +1
      April 24 2024 15: 42
      In fact of the matter. We must move from targeted strikes to massive strikes along delivery routes, otherwise we will be tormented by “swallowing dust” by collecting attack fragments at our strategic facilities in a 300-kilometer zone. Just yesterday Shoigu said we will increase the number of strikes somewhat. It was necessary to increase the i.i.o.t. at least half a year ago.

      Why does the Kremlin allow the bitches to play against us with only one goal, our goal, striking with impunity with missiles from MLRS?

      Exactly. And the deliveries haven't arrived yet. In general, the Kremlin’s slow-wittedness has become quite severe.
      1. -2
        April 24 2024 15: 47
        As soon as these missiles arrived at our position for the first time, we should have created a unit x, the purpose of which would be to find and destroy ANY MLRS anywhere in the Ukraine! But, and until now no one has bothered with this issue!
        1. +1
          April 24 2024 15: 52
          I said it 2 years ago and now nothing has changed - the Kremlin acts either retroactively or “half a shot.” ​​Is it possible to change it (the manner), or are the chances like those of a hunchback?
      2. +9
        April 24 2024 16: 14
        Quote: IvanIvanov
        In general, the Kremlin’s slow-wittedness has become quite severe.

        This is not slow-wittedness. A quarter of a century of our power, SOMEONE IS ALL THE TIME INTERFERING from carrying out basic logical actions... This is such a cunning policy - to pretend that hard work is going on and at the same time not doing anything...
        * * *
        Just imagine a situation where, during the Second World War, a high-ranking enemy of the people would have been discovered surrounded by temporary detention facilities... But here we easily...
        1. +7
          April 24 2024 16: 45
          Wow, there is censorship here, the comment is deleted at once. It is obvious that with its slow thinking the Kremlin is setting the country up and if the problems are not sorted out, why is such power needed? We need people who can make tough decisions, carry them out, and ask for them.
      3. +3
        April 24 2024 18: 45
        If you want, I’ll answer you. Just no offense. “Because, gladiolus.” What is the difference between those sitting in Kyiv and those sitting in the Kremlin?.. Nothing, essentially.. The bosses of the mess. Both here and there. How are they personally can they fight each other?
      4. AAK
        +2
        April 24 2024 20: 57
        In the former Ukrainian SSR there is a popular saying - “bachyly eyes, scho kupuvaly”, but everyone is already tired of the slow-wittedness from Borovitsky Hill, but where did 87% of 73% come from, or...
    2. 0
      April 24 2024 15: 47
      Who is preventing Putin from giving the order to launch a powerful missile strike on “untouchable” places in Kyiv?

      Gorbachev’s convoluted convolutions and collective, to put it mildly, indecision.
    3. +6
      April 24 2024 16: 10
      Quote: Thrifty
      Who is preventing Putin from giving the order to launch a powerful missile strike on “untouchable” places in Kyiv?

      And who said that Putin stands for protecting the interests of the Russian people? He defends the interests of the bourgeoisie - that’s why he was installed.
      1. +2
        April 24 2024 16: 18
        In my opinion, he has a vinaigrette in his head of very specific interests and claims to state thinking. The result is an eternal confusion in actions, which does not give people a clear understanding of what we are doing and where we are going. It is unlikely that the bourgeoisie needs a war; they are all groaning from it, wriggled out of necessity. The citizens themselves, for the most part, do not understand what and why. Well, what are we talking about if even the TV network has hardly changed.
        1. -1
          April 24 2024 16: 23
          Quote: IvanIvanov
          The result is an eternal confusion in actions, which does not give people a clear understanding of what we are doing and where we are going.

          Just food for thought:
          1. +3
            April 24 2024 16: 47
            Well, okay, now he represents a new state, we need to fight for it properly, preferably not with our tongues, but we got involved in the war and stood up, it’s unclear who and why we were portraying.
  6. +2
    April 24 2024 16: 57
    If it doesn’t reach Rublyovka, then why should the Kremlin worry?
  7. -3
    April 24 2024 17: 42
    this will only increase the loss of territory 404
  8. +1
    April 24 2024 18: 21
    But, against the backdrop of obvious failures of the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the front

    Against the backdrop of obvious failures of the Kremlin. Corrected it a little
  9. +1
    April 24 2024 18: 50
    Why don’t ours deploy missiles somewhere in Cuba or Venezuela, and don’t keep ships off the coast of the States, visible from the shore?
    1. -2
      April 25 2024 15: 26
      Do cubes need it?
      briefly
  10. -1
    April 24 2024 21: 29
    So, as I understand it, “they waited”? Red lines ready? I don’t even know what to wish for the residents of our above-mentioned cities, because wishing for patience in such a situation is simply stupid.
  11. -1
    April 25 2024 00: 36
    This is what it means to sell your land.
    I hope the Kremlin people have sobered up, or the State Duma will continue to write petitions to Congress, simulating work and concern, fortunately the children are in Europe and beyond.
  12. +1
    April 25 2024 10: 48
    Cassette head. many civilian casualties. Are the Atacama missiles tasked with shaking up the Russian regime?
    1. 0
      April 25 2024 11: 35
      and how will the regime change????
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. +1
    April 25 2024 15: 14
    Escalation. This is what the Anglo-Saxons really want. If you don’t answer, they will give you longer-range missiles so that you can reach Moscow. Then maybe our rulers will wake up.
  15. -1
    April 25 2024 15: 18
    Another reason to wipe Bankovaya off the face of the earth, destroy the nuclear power plant’s TP, and also open a hunt for all Ukrainian officials: both civilian and military.
    .
    By the way, there were several materials that it was useless to destroy the TP; they were quickly restored. In fact, ours only bomb small transformers. Increasing multi-hundred-ton TPs at power plants are not touched.