Training before war: NATO escalates the situation in the Suwalki Gap

80
Training before war: NATO escalates the situation in the Suwalki Gap


Where it is thin, there it is torn


Corridors are all the rage right now. Of particular concern is the Zangezur corridor, which Azerbaijan very much wants to lead through the territory of Armenia to its exclave of the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic. The Armenian leadership, of course, is not satisfied with this option - Pashinyan declares a violation of the sovereignty of the republic. This disagreement has not yet led to a war between Baku and Yerevan, but it does not contribute to the improvement of relations either.



The toponym Suwalki Corridor sounds even more resonant - the real concentration of the fears of the NATO bloc. As during the time of Berlin’s “Checkpoint Charlie,” the potential enemy pulled considerable forces toward the corridor.

From open sources it is known that 40 thousand military personnel from the NATO rapid reaction force are located nearby. Fears of Russian armor forced the Polish 14th Anti-Tank Regiment, armed with Israeli Spike, to be kept near the Suwalki corridor.

Also in the game are more than one and a half thousand soldiers from a mixed American-Polish-British armored group stationed near the towns of Orzysz and Bemowo Piske. On the Lithuanian side, near the town of Ruklu, about two thousand military personnel from Germany, the Czech Republic, Norway and the Netherlands are stationed. And of course, the mechanized infantry brigade “Iron Wolf” is the largest combat unit of the Lithuanian army. No matter how funny it may sound.


The legend from Brussels about a possible situation in the Suwalki corridor is as follows.

Russia, inspired by victories in Ukraine, will decide to seriously worsen relations with the NATO bloc. With one jerk, the Russian Army overcomes a corridor only 100 kilometers long and blocks the Baltic countries. At the same time, a naval landing force lands on the island of Gotland, which logically completes the blockade of our sworn friends in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

NATO analysts even assessed the course of the fighting, noting that the terrain was inconvenient for offensive operations and at the same time successful for the defenders. But even in such an advantageous position, the Europeans’ fears have not gone away - now they are worried that if the Russians occupy the corridor, it will not be easy to knock them out.

NATO military officials believe that there is no question of any occupation of the former republics of the USSR - the Kremlin simply needs to assert leadership in the region and finally discredit the North Atlantic Alliance.

The scenario is as fantastic as it is real, but with a small caveat. Russia may be forced to take such tough steps. For example, an attempt to block transit to the Kaliningrad region through the Baltic states.

Which, in fact, is what Lithuania is currently doing, hindering the movement of trains in every possible way. At first they tried to limit the transport of sanctioned goods, and now they are making it as difficult as possible to pay for transit from Russian banks. The purpose of such movements does not have any military or political expediency, but is only subordinated to the desire to worsen the quality of life of Kaliningrad residents as much as possible.

But recently, events around the Suwalki corridor have been developing according to a new scenario, in which NATO is trying on the role of an aggressor.

"Defense" of the Suwalki corridor


Recently, the Baltic states have literally been mired in NATO exercises. This is happening at a time when, geopolitically, the Suwalki corridor has somewhat lost its significance for the alliance. With Sweden's entry into the alliance, it became easier to control the Baltic Sea, which means that the corridor ceased to be a thin place on the map of Europe.

But the potential enemy’s attention, on the contrary, only intensified. On April 21, the Brave Griffin exercises started in the Alytus, Lazdiyai and Varena regions of Lithuania, in which more than one and a half thousand NATO troops, and with them about two hundred armored vehicles, took part. Poles, Lithuanians, Americans and Portuguese will learn to fight Russia.

Brave Griffin is not an isolated event. The exercises open a whole series of maneuvers - Saber Strike, Grand Quadriga, Immediate Response and others. In total, more than ten events are expected, some of which will take place in parallel to each other.

The common name for NATO military games is Steadfast Defender-24. All of them, to one degree or another, relate to the security of the Suwalki corridor. Of course, to security - in the understanding of alliance activists.

Events unfold in accordance with the Orsha strategic plan, about which little is known. It was adopted in 2022 on the wave of anti-Russian hysteria, and the main figures in it are Polish and Lithuanian troops. If the nuances of “Orsha” are unknown, then there is no need to talk about any defensive nature - NATO is hatching plans for a blockade of the Kaliningrad region. And that's the minimum.

The occupation of the Russian exclave is considered as a maximum bonus. The hope, obviously, is for the “weakening” of the Russian Army and the reluctance of the military-political leadership to aggravate relations with the enemy to the point of direct war.

However, besides such suicidal thoughts, there are also alternative options for events.


The most harmless scenario involves a gradual build-up of hysteria in the region. NATO needs to visualize the enemy in the public eye, and the myth of the Suwalki Gap strike is perfect for this. On the one hand, “we came in peace and don’t want war,” on the other, “look what insidious plans the Russians are preparing.”

By moving large masses of equipment and personnel to the corridor, NATO is only increasing its military presence on the border of Russia and Belarus. This cannot be explained by anything other than preparation for war.

The problem of the Suwalki corridor will be discussed for a very long time, thus allowing the concept of strategic containment of Russia to be worked out, which, according to Brussels and Washington, is certainly seeking to spread its influence as far to the west as possible.


Lithuania is becoming particularly hysterical. During the Thunder Strike maneuvers, the military will not only practice the war with Russia, but will also involve the civilian population in the games. Local generals warn:

“10 thousand people from the active reserve will receive draft notices, 2,5 thousand will be mobilized for preparation, another 2 thousand will have to appear for personal data verification. Over 4 thousand active military personnel, as well as members of the Riflemen Union and representatives of local authorities, will also take part in the exercises.”

From April 22 to May 10, during the largest maneuvers in the last ten years, Lithuania will live under the laws of actual wartime.

Or another example.

Purely “defensive” exercises Brave Griffin include, in particular, the landing of combat units, rapid movements of large formations and landing.

If this is not preparation for an attack, then what is?
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 27 2024 05: 13
    If this is not preparation for an attack, then what is?

    Blockade and attack are slightly different terms... Isn't it?
    1. +6
      April 27 2024 05: 33
      It would be nice in the article to outline the accents in Russia’s military doctrine related to the blockade of Kaliningrad...
      1. +2
        April 27 2024 06: 50
        Russia and Belarus have already outlined their emphasis in response to the Orsha strategic plan: an attack on one of the allies is an attack on both. Old Man confirmed. In the event of an attack on Kaliningrad, Belarus will declare war on NATO. In the event of an attack on Belarus, Russia will declare war on NATO. At the request of Belarus, Russia has placed nuclear weapons on the territory of the country, which will be used in the event of war. Old Man will not wait for his strategic nuclear forces to be bombed. It will immediately launch a nuclear strike on Warsaw and other major cities in Poland. The losses of the Poles will amount to millions of human lives. Barbarossa won't work.
        To repeat the Ukrainian scenario, NATO will first have to exclude Tribaltic from its ranks. Otherwise, nuclear war. There will be no red lines.
        In the event of a blockade of Kaliningrad, it will have to be supplied by sea. A naval blockade is a casus belli. Nobody will allow a second blockade of Leningrad.
        1. 0
          April 27 2024 11: 55
          Incident belli... Yes, we understand this. But there is also an incident in the Kremlin itself. And statements that we are not going to fight with NATO. Nuclear weapons? So they can wage war on us with convertible weapons. Is this our territory and will we defend it? Just here is an example nearby - Bplgorodskaya, Bryansk and further on the list. And the fact is that we cannot resist NATO with conventional weapons. The forces are not equal
          1. -2
            April 27 2024 11: 58
            Before using strategic nuclear forces, it is necessary to test tactical nuclear weapons and the Tsar Bomb. This will greatly cool down hotheads and create panic among snickering Western citizens and politicians.
            1. +1
              April 27 2024 12: 00
              Yes, just carry out tests.. There is a testing ground. Maybe it will work. Otherwise they probably think it’s rusty..
              1. -1
                April 27 2024 12: 54
                Everything about them may already be rusty. The British's Trident almost fell on a submarine. This is what solid fuel rockets are like: they lose their properties over time.
            2. -1
              April 27 2024 22: 27
              In the Western information background, Russia is a bear with feet of clay, which has slipped into the Stone Age against the backdrop of sanctions, which is conducting unsuccessful military operations in Ukraine with outdated weapons, suffering colossal losses, and the Ukrainian army is bombing Belgorod, Bryansk, Kursk with Western weapons, destroying oil refineries in our south ... Therefore, no tests will make an impression on these ordinary people.
              As in the already classic:
              - Maybe we’ll get drunk?
              - We’ll definitely suck, but then...

              Maybe it's time? Provocative question, but...
          2. 0
            April 27 2024 20: 40
            I don't agree! In my opinion, on the contrary, the reliance on conventional weapons in the NATO strategy was not justified. The forces of the NATO countries are completely insufficient to conduct large-scale databases, as events in Ukraine show, and with all the nuclear weapons coming out, we will not hit the Belgorod and Smolensk regions, but Brussels and other Paris.
        2. +3
          April 27 2024 18: 01
          Quote: Bearded
          In the event of a blockade of Kaliningrad, it will have to be supplied by sea. A naval blockade is a casus belli.

          1. A blockade is a complete cessation of communications with a blocked object. Supply by sea is a BREAKTHROUGH of the blockade, which the blockading party is obliged to prevent. Termination of access to the KOR by land (Lithuania completely stops land and air communications) is not a blockade, because sea ​​communication remains.
          2. A naval blockade without a land blockade? And in general, ANNOUNCEMENT OF A BLOCKADE of any territory is an act of WAR! Then what kind of “incident” can we talk about?
          Quote: Bearded
          To repeat the Ukrainian scenario, NATO will first have to exclude Tribaltic from its ranks.
          NATO will not exclude tigers. The Poles and K* will be thrown to their defense, perhaps the Germans will fit in.
          There will be no repetition of the “Ukrainian scenario”: they are not relatives to us, but the most HISTORICAL ENEMIES! And they will be treated as enemies - without counting and without pity.
          And about the Suwalki corridor. The actions of the RAV during the Northern Military District showed that 10 km of the intestine would be shot through and through, even with cannon artillery. Well, then what is the great meaning of this?
          If the shortcomings do move, then Latvia will cease to exist as an independent state within a week. Next is Lithuania. Estonia will surrender on its own... This will ensure land access to the territory of the KOR. All this will happen with the news from NATO that the nuclear forces of the Russian Federation are being brought into Full BG. There may be several nuclear incidents in Europe. And then we’ll see who has the faster GZO and how high the tsunami is off the coast of the States.
          Much will depend on the position of the PRC, Iran and India.
          1. -1
            April 27 2024 18: 04
            Competently stated.
            Plusanul. good
          2. +3
            April 27 2024 22: 51
            . If the shortcomings do move, then Latvia will cease to exist as an independent state within a week. Next is Lithuania. Estonia will surrender on its own...

            Cough cough. Kyiv in three days, Grozny in one regiment, we’ve already heard something like that.

            But on the other hand, you are absolutely right. There is no problem of the Suwalki corridor, there is a problem of the Belarusian balcony. The current outline of the contact line is unprofitable for respected Western partners; they should have taken care of this much earlier. But the current staff of respected Western partners is not yet ready to discuss this problem. We'll see if there is any progress on this issue.
            1. -4
              April 29 2024 13: 30
              Kyiv was promised to you in three days by German generals, not ours. So put your sarcasm back where it was.
              1. -1
                April 29 2024 14: 32
                You're confused, my friend.

                In this context, they usually remember the head of the KNSH Milli, a great friend of the Soviet regime. I remember that in Solovyov’s show they planned to finish it before the evening.
                1. -1
                  April 30 2024 06: 49
                  Can you give me a link? Well, of course not, use the standard trick of liars - look for yourself, but I don’t have time!”
                  1. +1
                    April 30 2024 09: 29
                    On TV?

                    Sorry, I won't. Information hygiene considerations.
                    1. -1
                      April 30 2024 14: 14
                      Interesting draining method!
                      1. +1
                        April 30 2024 15: 50
                        Yes please, buddy.

                        If you say that the cunning plan was just that - to get a “contact line” instead of a border - and that was exactly what was presented to the public a little over 2 years ago, then I’m not going to convince you.
    2. -2
      April 27 2024 06: 33
      A blockade is a variant of military action.
    3. +4
      April 27 2024 07: 02
      Evgeny Fedorov, maybe we’ll end the military operations on the outskirts with Victory first, before entering into another war?!
      1. -3
        April 27 2024 13: 12
        This is not our will, but their (opponents’) decision. They are launching this operation in the hope of turning the situation around in Ukraine, they say we can’t handle two fronts. So it will not be possible to end military operations in Ukraine by the beginning of the war in Belarus without applying extremely unpopular decisions.
  2. -10
    April 27 2024 06: 00
    They’ll climb so hard, but let them play, why escalate it?! Moreover, the army is ready, tested, they should be afraid.
    1. -2
      April 27 2024 09: 38
      The army is ready, but the generals are chewing snot. They haven’t been able to deal with the Ukrainians for three years now, but here they are going to fight with NATO.
    2. +1
      April 27 2024 11: 57
      Damn, Lord...Are there really still people like that...Give me a saber? A toy one, from "Children's World"?
    3. +2
      April 27 2024 12: 08
      They’ll climb so hard, but let them play, why escalate it?! Moreover, the army is ready, tested, they should be afraid.

      Are you ready? Why then are we throwing our entire world into radios, equipment, drones, NVGs, armored vehicles, etc.? And how much equipment have you lost over the years? We'll get it, I'm telling you for sure!
      And in general, what kind of war is there when the deputy ministers of defense are raking in money from the budget with excavators. Who would voluntarily die for such power?
      1. -5
        April 27 2024 13: 35
        Who will go??? Every day 1700 people volunteer, as they tell us from government channels! And they will go and increase payments and they will fall like lemmings to a cliff
      2. -3
        April 29 2024 13: 32
        Dude, think about it, during the Second World War, people bought tanks and planes! So you still have room to pump!
    4. -1
      April 28 2024 13: 30
      If this is sarcasm, then I will applaud you, if you are serious, then fool
  3. 0
    April 27 2024 06: 05
    from a mixed American-Polish-British armored group
    Each creature has a pair and each fancies itself a winner.
    Poles, Lithuanians, Americans and Portuguese will learn to fight Russia
    It’s clear with the Poles and Lithuanians, the Americans are the first instigators, but the Portuguese, what have they lost there? But an attempt to blockade the Kaliningrad region, and even more so to close the Baltic for Russia, is a direct path to the start of a conflict.
  4. +1
    April 27 2024 06: 15
    Much has changed in the world. And only NATO remained the same as at the time of its creation. Not in numbers, but in focus. And among the presidents of the United States there were never our friends. There used to be such a consciousness. But over time, it began to dissolve. Presidents walked towards us, when the balance of power came. When we become completely different from Western countries, perhaps world harmony will come. That is, a peaceful state of opposites.
  5. -6
    April 27 2024 06: 22
    Thank you, Eugene!
    Kaliningrad has nothing to do with it. The truth lies on the surface, and the plan was called “ORSHA”.
    This is NATO’s preparation for a repeat of the Blitzkrieg in Belarus. Involve Belarus in battles near Kobrin, or somewhere else in the Brest region, and strike from the North and towards from the South, encircle and dissect our Belarusian group and reach the Dnieper, in fact, this artificial border between the Russian Federation and Belarus.
    The plan is successful, it just needs to be stuffed with troops and the Northern Group needs to be trained. The south doesn’t need to be taught anything; the flayers have more weapons and combat experience than any NATO country.
    The success of such an operation would dramatically change the balance of power in Europe and would lower our prestige to an all-time low. In this situation, we would be left without allies at all and would be forced to fulfill any demands of the collective West, including regarding the Kaliningrad region.
    That’s why Old Man has been hysterical lately. He feels that “Independent Belarus” will not survive such a war. Hence the attempt to scare everyone with the presence of nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus. In fact, this only aggravates the situation, further motivating S.V. Lavrov’s Western partners to take decisive and extremely cruel measures.
    Let me note: if Belarus were a republic within the Russian Federation, NATO would never even allow itself to dream about something like this.
    1. 0
      April 27 2024 07: 39
      Leave the hysterics to yourself. We don't have any hysterics here. If they attack, we will fight. That's the point.
      1. -10
        April 27 2024 07: 59
        We don't have any hysterics here. If they attack, we will fight. That's the point.

        What will you fight with? What will Russia send? Will he have time to send it?
        To do this, we need to mobilize and start coordinating now. And once coordination takes place and everything is ready - to forestall the enemy offensive and return yours and ours.
        Your leader’s hysteria is clearly visible, he will be smarter. He understands where everything is going, and most of all he is afraid of BETRAY. Experience shows that this is an element of all totalitarian regimes. Many of you (even 5% is a lot!) are ready to fit in with the European dreams. The Pole's map will help you!
        But as soon as they start bombing like adults, especially the BelNPP, you will have panic and hysteria. Spoiled by almost eight decades of peaceful life, it is not easy to plunge into war at once.
        Independent Belarus is your choice, just as long as it doesn’t end with joining the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
  6. -3
    April 27 2024 07: 43
    Circumstances of force majeure are gradually arising for us around the Kaliningrad region, the Suwalki corridor, and Belarus. Such a number of enemy troops and statements from the NATO bloc will force us to strike first, as in the Northern Military District. Old Man feels this like no one else. With the start of the exercises, Belarus and we need to bring our troops to the highest combat readiness and move them to combat positions. soldier
    1. -6
      April 27 2024 10: 33
      Such a number of enemy troops and statements from the NATO bloc will force us to strike first, as in the Northern Military District.

      Think sensibly, this is a minus for the security here, but a plus from me!
      Belarus, as a position, is disastrous for defense, but beneficial for attack. It's time to open this Baltic abscess and eliminate the NATO bridgehead. Return lands belonging to Russia and Belarus. Estonia - to the Leningrad region, Latvia - to the Pskov region, and Lithuania and Bialystok - to Belarus.
      A separate moment of restoration of the integrity of East Prussia - the land that swore allegiance to Russia in 1758, where it should be.
    2. 0
      April 28 2024 13: 25
      With the start of the exercises, Belarus and we need to bring our troops to the highest combat readiness and move them to combat positions.

      It’s just that there are barely enough troops there for a good parade, not to mention a war... And if Ukrainian UAVs calmly fly to St. Petersburg (yes, not only to it), it means that most of the air defense systems, along with personnel, have been transferred to the Northwestern Military District zone . How will you really try to scare the adversary? Bare butt?
      1. -2
        April 28 2024 13: 35
        Well, first of all, don’t frighten, but destroy with all available means. And not everyone is afraid like you to fight back the enemy at the right time. The SVO uses no more than 10% of the available equipment and weapons.
        Yes, we have problems with the number of personnel, but not fatally.
        1. +2
          April 28 2024 13: 37
          Yes, I also know that everything is fine with us on TV, and in general, we haven’t even started yet. Thanks for reminding me.
  7. 0
    April 27 2024 07: 49
    And we are crushing them with the “red line”. And we will win with concern.
  8. +3
    April 27 2024 07: 54
    For neither Kaliningrad is a threat of an Iskander attack on the rear of the EU. But they can and will blackmail you with a blockade. There are many options there....some loads will pass through, others will not....they can balance “on the brink”. The Russian Federation cannot bear a conventional war with NATO, therefore, we need to think here.
  9. -2
    April 27 2024 08: 43
    The corridors end in a wall, and the tunnels lead to the light.... (c)
    1. 0
      April 27 2024 09: 20
      This phrase is repeated by many people who have had a near-death experience: “the light at the end of the tunnel.” laughing
  10. +4
    April 27 2024 09: 34
    100 km of swamps and forests, even the laying of column tracks, not to mention the construction of railways and highways to the region, can become more expensive than the Crimean Bridge, and in terms of vulnerability with zero possibility of protection. A pointless event from all points of view. The question is different, if it were not for the impotence of our relevant services and structures, the presence of at least some kind of political will, then this issue could have been resolved long ago and crossed off the agenda, and the region would not be sitting in a transport blockade as it is now, with our bureaucrats swelling their cheeks who have long promised a terrible and decisive answer.
    As an option, a unilateral (of course, multilateral would be better, but our vertical is not “shmagla” to resolve such issues) declaration of a section of 100x2-5 km as a supranational territory, with the construction of non-intersecting national transit transport routes. The second way, more radical, and therefore not feasible under our decrepit “vertical”, which was implemented only under Stalin, who was so hated by them because of the awareness of his wretchedness. Namely, the immediate liquidation for eternity of these 3 under-formations, created by misunderstanding, with their division without any national identification between the Leningrad, Kaliningrad, Pskov regions and the Republic of Belarus, i.e. as the main historical heir of the Polish-Lithuanian principality, when replacing the relevant administrative authorities, etc.
  11. -1
    April 27 2024 09: 37
    they always shout about Russian aggression and that they themselves are forced to defend themselves, and from this it directly follows that they are going to attack themselves. According to the calculations of NATO and the Pentagon, Ukraine’s task was to weaken Russia and they themselves should strike at the same time at hour N. First, it is necessary to bring forces to the borders and at the same time send troops into Ukraine, which is what they are doing. The only question is when they consider themselves ready for an attack, and there is no doubt that it will be
  12. +1
    April 27 2024 10: 27
    The problem of the Suwalki corridor can be solved much simpler - bring to power in Lithuania a sane government that will act based on the interests of the country, and not NATO.
    1. +1
      April 27 2024 10: 38
      I agree with you. Why fight, strike first, or wait for the enemy to strike. It is necessary now to send reconnaissance groups into the Baltic states, transfer weapons, form partisan detachments, send your people into politics, organize mass unrest, etc. Everything is described in detail in the instructions of the MTR of both the United States and its allies. All that remains is to translate it into Russian, adapt it to the conditions and move on.
    2. -4
      April 27 2024 10: 44
      This is basically impossible. All small countries, especially those belonging to the EU and NATO, do not have subjectivity. As the Americans say: Theirs not to reasons why, theirs but to do and die!
      1. -2
        April 27 2024 11: 48
        That’s exactly why some kind of Maidan, like the “Rose Revolution,” is possible. A provocation on the border “a la Finland 1940” is a less acceptable option.
    3. +1
      April 28 2024 16: 35
      In modern conditions, and to a greater extent due to impotence, the wretchedness of the relevant services and structures, this is practically impossible. Skills, techniques, and most importantly, specialists were purposefully destroyed during the so-called. reforms.
      1. 0
        April 28 2024 21: 23
        Everything flows, everything changes. What seemed unreal yesterday is commonplace today. Yes, there is no need to push too hard. The territory is dying out and scattering at an accelerated pace.
        1. 0
          April 29 2024 09: 21
          T.b. with whom to work, then. All that remains are marginalized people and young people who have long been no longer ours and were brought up differently. Now the situation there and the attitude towards us is worse than in 39.
          1. 0
            April 29 2024 17: 25
            Do you think their youth are better than ours? I don’t know what the situation is there, but life shows that in a dispute between a refrigerator and a TV, the refrigerator always wins.
            1. 0
              April 30 2024 15: 56
              It looks like we are talking about nothing, b.b. there is no need to convince anyone of something and agitate for something before the holidays, my personal opinion was expressed, based on what I “see from the window” and having been involved in all this directly. As for young people, they are no better or worse, they are just different, brought up on different principles and morals. By the way, as an example, the same thing is happening in Serbia, which is still friendly and allied, the “Soviet” generation will die out, it will come to power and it will be a completely different Serbia, not the fact that it is allied. There are a lot of examples of how nations are reformatted in history, Nazi Germany in 7 years, the Outskirts in 8, and “more than 30 lapdogs are spudded with non-zero starting positions.” All this is happening purposefully and planned in the complete absence of opposition from our relevant services and structures, the helplessness, incompetence and banal incompetence of random people there, in cases of banal sabotage. I think further continuation of the discussion makes no sense, good luck.
  13. -2
    April 27 2024 10: 42
    Interesting situation. Blocking movement was not thought of by those who cut the borders, but now it is a normal thing. They are silent about the siege of enclaves. And the question of the corridor arose here. Can the fundamental question be raised - to liquidate what was created: Poland, Lithuania... and these Leninist Ukraine, Estonia and what else?
  14. +3
    April 27 2024 11: 14
    Once again I will repeat this at VO - we need to prepare to ensure that we can carry out about 100% of transit and cargo transportation to KO by sea. On land, the enemy has a lot of levers to constantly spoil our blood - these are levers of pressure and creating tension. At sea it will be much more difficult for him to do all this without direct and unambiguously interpreted confrontation.

    Our task here is not to unambiguously “swallow” the potential for spoiling us on land from the Baltic side - but to create conditions that will allow us to respond to such actions without “time pressure”, outside the time frames predicted by Western analytics.
    They can put this snare - but it is we who will decide when to activate this snare, not them.
    1. 0
      April 27 2024 11: 59
      I’m afraid to become a prophet, but Finland, Sweden and the Baltic states will introduce a naval blockade even before the hot phase of the war. They are already trying to ban us from transporting oil, and if they succeed, then everything else. An exception is humanitarian cargo after 100% inspection. That is, they will respond in a mirror way to the Grain Deal, beloved by our authorities.
      So, to own the sea you must own the coast.
      1. +4
        April 27 2024 12: 08
        A naval blockade, at least, is a clearly stated casus beli, with all that it implies. But on land, you can organize all sorts of nonsense - you can, for example, organize a rock collapse under a railway track. And then it takes a loooong time to fix it. It is possible to introduce new transit security rules and reduce transit at the border. In the process of this, you can “prolong” something, and then raise noise and stench, under this “temporarily limit traffic” and so on, there are stupidly a lot of options.
        They can be bullied and then various international authorities will begin to lazily roll out pieces of paper - and we will grind our teeth, count losses and prepare a “strike” in an environment of time pressure and under the hood of Western analytics.

        I think that the land direction now is an unacceptable vulnerability, it’s like the nostrils of a bull into which a ring is threaded - and the ring is now in the hands of our opponents..
        1. -3
          April 27 2024 12: 30
          The corridor is interesting only as a pretext for war. MI6 will organize a competent provocation and declare us aggressors. Today, after Istanbul, red lines, difficult regroupings and grain deals, few people believe in our decisive response in action and not in words. And after the loss of an entire squadron of surface ships, they are not really afraid. A parade on the Neva is one thing, but a battle in a closed sea with the dominance of an enemy who owns the coast, at sea and in the air, is very different. And using our main trump card - nuclear weapons - for these purposes is pointless.
          We need a well-planned operation of the Armed Forces of the Union State, which will definitely resolve the situation in our favor. But for this it is necessary to carry out real mobilization, provide weapons, and create groupings of troops. And the main thing is to forestall the enemy. Having lost the initiative, NATO usually falls into prostration and stops the lost campaign in order to prepare for revenge. So it is not too late to do everything necessary to win the coming war.
          1. +2
            April 28 2024 13: 15
            Preempt the enemy? Is it like 24.02.2022/XNUMX/XNUMX?
        2. +1
          April 28 2024 16: 46
          There are 1000+ ways to do this under the most plausible pretexts without bringing the issue to direct confrontation, in which, by the way, our chances are after the “fun and reckless reform” of the fleet with the massive sale of steamships to the bone, the destruction of shipbuilding and other “fun” of our nobility, so the chances of success are currently very doubtful. Moreover, taking into account the stage of formation of VO.
  15. +1
    April 27 2024 11: 52
    I would look at the situation much more broadly, although, of course, I agree with the author in many respects. I actually already wrote about this in my articles. In my opinion, the events on this isthmus are one of the puzzles in the big picture of the impending full-scale war between the eastern members of NATO and Russia. Here’s the thing, when we talk about the concept of “hybrid war,” we sometimes forget that it consists of two parts. And one of these parts is a “hot” war. And the longer such a hybrid war lasts, the less chance there is to rely only on one’s own “proxy forces”, the more difficult it is to control the war process.

    The Americans need a big war in eastern Europe, and, from their point of view, it should not be limited to Ukraine. In their opinion, it would even be very good if many NATO countries were directly drawn into the conflict. It’s even better if Russia is forced to use tactical nuclear weapons, and if it doesn’t, then the United States can do it themselves, using aerial bombs with tactical nuclear warheads, and then point it at Russia. Who will figure it out?

    For the Americans, this is a unique chance to solve a huge number of their problems in one fell swoop, sacrificing a small number of their soldiers, and what about the soldiers of the armies of other NATO countries - are they really people? They don't even think about them. Whether Finland and Sweden will burn in hellish fire, whether the Baltic countries will become craters, whether Poland will wash itself with millions of victims - all this does not matter to them. What matters is the growth of income from the military-industrial complex, strategic supplies, the bogging down of Russia in the war in Europe so that it cannot help China, the salvation of the power of the deep state within the United States and much more matters. The time of "cosmetic" wars is coming to an end - the stakes have risen greatly.
    1. +2
      April 27 2024 12: 48
      No, the destruction of Europe is not beneficial for the States, it is their main strategic ally (of course, it would be more correct to write - subordinate, but oh well). As soon as Europe is completely bogged down with us, the States are left alone with China and here they are not equal either in production or in the number of heads. And the main point is that in the event of a global and negative development of the database between Russia and NATO, Europe will not exist as some kind of sane force, Russia is as weakened as possible, and here - China automatically receives ALL our resources. For the States, this will be a complete disaster that will destroy them as an at least somewhat significant state.

      “Russia getting bogged down in a war in Europe so that it cannot help China,” - everything is the other way around, “yesterday” Blinken went to China and rudely demanded that they stop helping us, to which he was sent to the “Yang He River.” Yes

      With Ukraine, for some reason many have forgotten that the main enemy of the United States is China, and not Russia - even with its nuclear potential. Any war is a battle of economies; weapons are absolutely secondary here, because they depend on this very economy. Therefore, there will be no “NATO attack on Russia”. Yes, we are interesting to the States and China only as a source of resources. But - the global collision of the United States / NATO with nuclear Russia makes the winner in this entire geopolitical “game” - exclusively China. And the States understand this very well. China, in turn, understands perfectly well that in the event of a “complete weakening” of Russia, they will be left without resources, and as we remember, resources are the main engine of the economy. And therefore, China will not give “these resources” into the hands of the States - dooming itself to death.

      Therefore, there will be no global clash between NATO and Russia; today NATO is only about China, and the States do not intend to scatter NATO forces in the fields of Ukraine at all. Hence the pitiful crumbs that have been thrown at Kyiv for three years now.
      1. +3
        April 27 2024 13: 14
        I wouldn't overestimate China's power. Neither economic nor military. The PRC is undoubtedly a powerful economic power, but it has, how to put it, already begun to rapidly disintegrate. Just look at the younger generations of Chinese who prefer to take extra rest than to work like “Papa Carlo,” as their parents did, and even more so their grandparents. I’d rather keep silent about the children of their elite, who, despite the Chinese studying in detail the mistakes of the USSR (they even created a special research institute for this), are repeating the path of Vera Brezhneva en masse - and this is the road to absolute regression, this is the path to the collapse of society and, by the way , states. Finally, if we look at the Chinese educational system, if we look at a Chinese student under a magnifying glass, we will see a brilliant performer, but an extremely weak innovator, a new member of society devoid of initiative. It follows from this that the Chinese are very bad at creating anything, but good at copying, in this regard they are extremely dependent.

        As for the Chinese army, it is very numerous and well armed. Very well armed. The fleet is also strong, there are no words for that. However, I must note that China has an extremely long history of defeats and military failures. The modern army has so far shown itself exclusively in parades, but has not shown itself in any way in real combat operations. The fear of losing its flair of power is probably one of the reasons for the PRC's extremely indecisive actions towards Taiwan. Since the Chinese consider Taiwan their territory, then they should act more actively, and not beat themselves in the chest and emptyly threaten “monstrous” consequences. Therefore, the Chinese army, whose image took a long time to create and can easily be lost, is more a symbol than a real force (relatively, of course). Screaming loudly at parades is not yet combat experience.

        I believe the United States understands that Europe will have an extremely difficult time against Russia. But Russia will have a very hard time. Everything in this confrontation will depend on the Russian Federation. If she does not mess with the eastern members of NATO, then victory can be achieved with relatively small losses. Although the use of tactical atomic weapons by Russia will suit the United States. Western Europe will remain unharmed and will be able to help the United States in the fight against China, while at the same time being even more tied to the United States.

        At the moment, in the confrontation between the USA and China, I would bet on the USA.
      2. -2
        April 27 2024 13: 25
        About China, these are AUKUS, Canada, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Vietnam. Nor other henchmen from the Asia-Pacific region.
        And Europe is just right for us. The United States needs to deprive China of a profitable base in the Pacific Ocean, for which we are tied up in a war in Europe. So there is no point in hoping that they will not set Europe on fire.
      3. +2
        April 28 2024 13: 13
        Hence the pitiful crumbs that have been thrown at Kyiv for three years now.

        But these crumbs are more or less enough for them to be almost equal with us. And this is not surprising - because the quantity and nomenclature of what is transmitted are clearly verified to fulfill the main task - maintaining an approximate parity of the parties, so that “this music is eternal.” The United States is categorically not satisfied with a convincing and, most importantly, quick victory for either side, therefore, if the Russian Armed Forces are not taken out at all, there will again be delays in Congress in terms of allocating funds to Ukraine; if Russia’s offensive threatens the existence of Ukraine, then the transferred “crumbs” will immediately They will become bigger and more nutritious. Alas, the SVO has already turned into a party where both Ukraine and Russia are figures, and the players are in a completely different place. Now the main task of the players is to exhaust both sides of the conflict, drain their potential and resources against each other, make them more accommodating, in need of external arbiters, and deprive them of unnecessary, from their point of view, ambitions. And so far everything is working out.
        And we are still puffed up to resist all the evil nat, when “pathetic crumbs” are from their capabilities, and I’m not even talking about weapons, but about intelligence information transmitted online from Western satellites and AWACS aircraft.
        And in the US/West-China confrontation, have we chosen the right side? Were we offended by the fact that Russia was considered a raw materials appendage in the West? Who does China need us for? Do we want to be another center of power? Yeah, the success of import substitution seems to show our capabilities in this regard. And the ease with which China actually merged us (how many Chinese weapons were transferred to us?) says that our notorious “turn to the East” is nothing more than a tactical propaganda slogan.
    2. 0
      April 28 2024 16: 55
      It is very doubtful that because of the Baltic lap dogs, they will “get excited” to something serious, it will only be a reason for general squealing and new packages of sanctions. And when in this place there will be historical Russian toponyms, and they themselves will be in the form of districts within 3 regions of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus without any national mention, then everything will wither away by itself and will be included in a paragraph in the history textbooks.
  16. 0
    April 27 2024 13: 33
    The equipment in the photo on the splash screen is Polish.
  17. -2
    April 27 2024 13: 42
    Well, they conduct exercises and concentrate. Why is that sad for us? If they gather in one place, it’s easier to destroy them if they move. If it’s just to appease the crowds from the Baltic states, let them spend their motor resources and money on rides. Here, after all, the basis is a simple thing - NATO’s structures must justify their existence and funding. Therefore, even if the enemy did not exist, he would have been invented. On the other hand, that side is training - it’s good for us to be prepared for any options.
  18. +2
    April 27 2024 13: 43
    Well, our comprador bourgeoisie and the departed government not far from them are only increasing the transshipment of goods through the Baltic states. Recently there was news about the purchase of Russian grain by the Baltic states. They demand that we be angry at the attacks of the Balts, while they themselves earn money. Am I the only one who thinks we are going down different paths?
  19. -2
    April 27 2024 13: 45
    Each exercise is an opportunity to study the enemy's tactics, strengths and weaknesses.
  20. -2
    April 27 2024 15: 25
    Summarizing everything that has been written, don’t you think that in view of the accumulation of enemy troops at the borders of the Russian Federation and Belarus, the Government of the Russian Federation and Belarus needs to prepare an official statement (TASS is authorized to declare) about the unprecedented impudence of the aggressive North Atlantic Alliance, which has stood at the borders of our states with the intention of starting World War III ..This must be done immediately.
    1. +2
      April 27 2024 18: 36
      The government of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus needs to prepare an official statement (TASS is authorized to declare) about the unprecedented impudence of the aggressive North Atlantic Alliance, which has stood at the borders of our states with the intention of starting World War III... This must be done immediately


      There is already an answer to your proposal just above. I quote, if you didn’t read the comments carefully:
      avia12005
      (Yuri)
      Today, 07: 49
      And we are crushing them with the “red line”. And we will win with concern.

      And I’ll ask you personally, well, they made a statement, and what next? Are you expecting everyone to be scared? Or will they unanimously admit that they were wrong, admit their mistakes and become “white and fluffy,” like glamorous cats? Take off your rose-colored glasses and often use the place where you do your hair for what it is intended for - to think. Before you draw a line, it's important to make sure someone will notice.
  21. 0
    April 27 2024 19: 30
    Kaliningrad is a pain in Nato's ass
  22. +1
    April 27 2024 20: 06
    Just like in Soviet times, when cutting up territories based on the expediency of the moment was a common thing, they did not eliminate the Suwalki corridor so that Kaliningrad would have a land connection with the “mainland”. It was impossible not to understand that the Balts are a weak, unreliable link in the fraternal family of the peoples of the USSR and it is short-sighted to count on the road to Kaliningrad through the lands of the sprat-eaters.
  23. 0
    April 27 2024 22: 54
    Mir fällt bei all dem immer und immer wieder nur eine Militär-Weisheit ein:

    ANGRIFF ist die BESTE VERTEIDIGUNG...!!!!!

    Es ist ein unübersehbares Gesamt-Szenario in Sicht und das ist eindeutig ein bevorstehender Angriff der Nato an mehreren Fronten, um den endgültigen SIEG der russischen Föderation über die Bandera-Nazis in Kiew doch noch irgendwie abzuwenden...!!
    Will man den in Moskau wirklich erst warten, bis die Krim-Brücke und die Krim selbst erneut massiv und dieses mal vielleicht mit größerem Erfolg angegriffen wird...?!? Bitte nicht...!!!
  24. 0
    April 28 2024 12: 35
    For NATO, the most practical solution in order to secure the Suwalki corridor, and reduce the military significance of Kaliningrad to almost zero (turning it, essentially, into a version of Transnistria, only with access to the sea, but the Baltic is now the undivided possession of NATO) is to tear it away from Russia Belarus. And it is unlikely that the emphasis here is on external invasion, but rather on working with both local elites and the opposition. And I would not guarantee that this activity of theirs does not have a chance of success. There, it seems, we have placed our bets on Lukashenko alone, just as in Ukraine we relied on Yanukovych, and then on Medvedchuk. Option B, it seems, we did not consider and do not consider it necessary. And in a situation of internal conflict, especially betrayal (let’s say more diplomatically - reorientation, reformatting of multi-vector) of the elites, our nuclear weapons will turn from a deterrent factor into someone’s trophy.
  25. 0
    April 28 2024 17: 53
    An alliance with China, Korea and Iran is needed, a military alliance with commitments.
  26. 0
    1 May 2024 11: 22
    In the event of a threat to the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, we have the right to use nuclear weapons, first tactical ones against the nearest aggressor countries, where the main NATO military contingents are concentrated, and if this does not help, then strategic nuclear weapons, otherwise what is the point in them?
  27. 0
    1 May 2024 15: 26
    Ukrainians are fleeing to Geyropa and where will they run? America will not expose its ass, will not abandon it like the Afghans
  28. 0
    5 May 2024 17: 28
    There is a lot said here (in the comments of “regulars” of VO) about the doctrines of Russia... All previous and current Doctrines of Russia, regarding the protection of its own sovereignty and other “immunities”, are Byzantine, florid, vague in definitions, devoid of militant specifics, which allows the enemy, even such “poor” ones as the Baltic States, “run like adults” on all “international corners” and make quite eloquent “attacks” towards Russia... Russia has made and continues to make, in my opinion, unforgivable mistakes in relations with the West - not noticing and “forgiving” (and possibly by prior agreement of the parties), rather “incorrect” expressions and actions addressed to oneself, which require decisive action, including “body movements to change the shape of the speaker’s face.” The world has long become different. He has lost his bearings in the world of elementary decency, tact, good manners and understands only brute force, the inevitability of punishment and unpredictability, which makes him nervous and “plunge into persistent diarrhea,” which ultimately “returns” the remnants of his brain to the genetic a sense of “healthy vigilance,” which in modern diplomatic language is called respect for the sovereignty of the rights and dignity of the State in all the diversity of these concepts, without endlessly drawing “red lines” and expressing “the latest concerns” about this State... Russia can, of course, justify that She especially didn’t have the strength, time, and desire to have a corresponding “influence” on the West + the USA, due to her “busy integration” into the friendly family of capitalist states” for the last 30 years... And “ there were simply no people “focused” on this process (educating the West + USA to respect Russia) by definition... The new “boyars” were “cutting” Russia around the clock, and the population learned to live in a new paradigm called “liberal” democracy"... So we have “finished the game” with capitalist liberalism with a de-ideologized society, a “fifth column” within and with the persistent disrespect and deafness of the surrounding states... Thank our Lord for not allowing the collapse, along with the USSR, of the nuclear “ shield" of Russia... And with the specification of the Doctrine of the Defense of Russia - let's figure it out, there are prerequisites and certain hopes....