“No more delays”: Britain passed a bill to deport some migrants to Rwanda

Britain has passed a bill to deport some migrants to Rwanda. The head of the British government, Rishi Sunak, has been seeking this for a long time.

This message came from the Associated Press.

They said that a legislative initiative to resolve the migration issue was approved by the British Parliament. And a few hours earlier, Sunak said that he was ready to organize the first flights to send deported refugees to Africa as early as June.

This event was preceded by endless inconsistencies between the House of Lords and the House of Commons of the British Parliament, which created a kind of vicious circle that did not allow the issue to be resolved. The first proposed numerous amendments to the law, which the second refused to accept, so it returned the bill. This went on for about two years. As a result, tonight the House of Lords went along with the lower house of parliament, repealing its latest amendment, thereby creating the conditions for approval of the bill.

The impasse has been broken, but various human rights organizations are now protesting against the bill, calling it inhumane.

As for Rishi Sunak, he is determined to finish what he started. He hopes that the immediate implementation of the decision will stop the flow of illegal migrants sweeping Britain.

No more prevarication, no more delays

- said the British Prime Minister.

Comments

[Orange bigg]

The flag of Rwanda is similar to the flag of Ukraine. I think Ukrainians will like it in Rwanda. Zelensky made a mistake. He should have bought a castle not in the UK, but in Rwanda. They would kick him out of the castle in the UK as a migrant, and in Rwanda he would have to look for something for himself again. In short, these gentlemen threw Ze into the dust.

[bars042]

He doesn’t need the Turkish coast and he doesn’t need Africa.
He has a villa in Italy, in Egypt with his mother-in-law.
“I found the Zelenskys’ secret villa and was brutally killed”:
Read on WWW.KP.RU: https://www.kp.ru/daily/27598/4871396/why journalist Mohammed Al-Alawi was killed.

Italy:

[solar]

The flag of Rwanda is similar to the flag of Ukraine. I think Ukrainians will like it in Rwanda. Zelensky made a mistake.

This law has nothing to do with Ukrainians. It concerns illegal migrants.

[Nastia makarova]

nick all consulates are closed from the 24th))) so anyone who doesn’t have time will become illegal, although it might be better to go to Rwanda than to a trench under an hour-long yar

[Fitter65]

Quote from solar

This law has nothing to do with Ukrainians. It concerns illegal migrants.

Here, just past the basin, they began to develop this law just after the influx of Ukrainians, and adopted it because of the Ukrainians. So Welcome, independent and independent hulks to Rwanda...

[alystan]

The upper half (blue) looks more like the Kazakh flag.
There, even lower, there are two narrow stripes - yellow and dark green.
But if you “carefully” fold it and leave only the top two stripes visible, then this is already a ukroflag.
It reminded me of the recent “provocation” of the wife of the Russian ambassador during the presidential elections, when out of all the many colors of her scarf, only blue and yellow were visible on her.

[Good Evil]

Well, Sunak is doing the right thing! An example for our “legislators”!

[Orange bigg]

Will Sunak himself be sent to Rwanda after the law is passed?

[Joker62]

Will Sunak himself be sent to Rwanda after the law is passed?

Most likely they will send him to his historical homeland - India.

[alystan]

Sunak himself was born in England, his father in Kenya, and his mother in Tanganyika. In reality, he only has a historical connection with India. But I will express one more thought - they are not ethnic Hindus. His ancestors only came from there.

But the idea of ​​sending migrants to Africa was not initially his idea. And he takes the rap.

The British authorities have been making attempts to “get rid” of migrants for a long time; for several years they have been trying to persuade the migrants themselves to voluntarily leave England and go “home.” As an option, they offered this same Rwanda, with which serious negotiations were even held. But they never led to anything real. But the last meeting, literally at the end of last year, ended with the British Home Secretary signing a document on sending illegal immigrants who found themselves on British soil to Rwanda. At the same time, he stated that Rwanda has a good reputation as a country that treats refugees and migrants humanely and professionally (!?) The words sounded simply mocking, because it cannot be that a British politician is not aware of the world-famous “humane killings of people” "in Rwanda. But apparently the situation in Britain is really such that today official London is ready to send migrants anywhere, as long as the local authorities agree. Not giving a damn about any unsightly facts from the recent history of Rwanda...

London even managed to joyfully announce the opportunity to deport illegal immigrants to Rwanda and that 300 million pounds had already been transferred to Kigali for these purposes.

Only after this did some unexpected delays begin. First, our own bureaucracy intervened, and then the European Court of Human Rights, which considered this a violation of human rights. A little later, it suddenly became clear that the houses for migrants built in Rwanda with British money had long been sold into private hands.

Britain hastily began to look for new countries willing to accept their illegal immigrants. Most of the potential candidates in Latin America flatly refused. Neither Morocco, nor Tunisia, nor Namibia and Gambia expressed interest. But (!?) negotiations with Armenia, Côte d'Ivoire, Botswana and Costa Rica (CA) intensified. Even Ukraine almost made it onto the list...

Now everything seems to be back to normal... But for some reason it seems to me that someone or something will interfere with the shaves again.

[Nexcom]

The bolt cutter will rejoice when he learns about this.......

[AdAstra]

And yet comrade Boltorez was right

[Bolt cutter]

I’m more familiar with the local cuisine than the local know-it-alls . And human rights activists were crushed with money - there are few blacks willing to love for free.

[tralflot1832]

Bolt cutter, I have suspicions that Comrade Macoron will deport his illegal immigrants through England to Rwanda before the Olympics.

[Bolt cutter]

They feel good in France, they will scatter around Calais and Paris like cockroaches. If earlier they were swimming for a fat freebie, now they will trample somewhere else and won’t ask for macron.

[Comrade]

Quote: Bolt Cutter

If earlier they were swimming for a fat freebie, now they will trample somewhere else and won’t ask for macron.

Germany, as always, is number one in Europe for hospitality. Belgium, Norway and the rest of the Netherlands are breathing down her neck.

[Bolt cutter]

Why do animals from the shores of Belgium and France travel to England on inflatables, and not on buses to Germany and Holland?

[Comrade]

Quote: Bolt Cutter

Why do animals from the shores of Belgium and France travel to England on inflatables, and not on buses to Germany and Holland?

In England the food is better (for some reason).
The solution to the problem with illegal immigrants is to simply not pay benefits. In Poland they give you thirty zlotys, food and a bed, so there’s no problem there. Through Poland straight to Germany and beyond.
If the British followed the example of the Poles and the Baltic states, no one would sail to them.

[Bolt cutter]

Unfortunately, it doesn’t always work - even living illegally, in England, unlike Poland, you can save up money to survive. Crime, of course.

[Comrade]

Quote: Bolt Cutter

even living illegally, in England, unlike Poland, you can save up money to live on.

Undoubtedly. But if you stop paying benefits, the lion’s share of freeloaders will be cut off. The Negro will argue simply - in England they don’t pay, but on the mainland they do. So that's where I'll go.
There was no need to discuss anything for two years, to negotiate with anyone, just turn off the “benefits” option, and the blacks themselves would flee from England.

[I dare to_notice_]

Ah... I'm embarrassed to ask...
Comrade himself Rishi...to Rwanda too?

[Orange bigg]

There, half of Great Britain will have to move to Rwanda.

[I dare to_notice_]

There, half of Great Britain will have to move to Rwanda.
...where they belong.

[Orange bigg]

And let Zelensky be taken with them as President. He will go on business trips and get help for Rwanda. True, he will have to build a castle in Rwanda, but I think that over time he will work off these costs. Plant a poppy plantation in Rwanda for Zelensky.

[I dare to_notice_]

No.
It's better to let him be there... the crocodile will just eat him.

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

“Britain passed a bill to deport migrants to Rwanda” -

- Something similar has already happened - Madagascar plan - developed in the Third Reich (continuing the UK's Uganda Plan) a plan to deport Jews from Europe to the island of Madagascar...

[rocket757]

MALASSES! They do things in their usual manner.
If someone doesn’t understand, they will explain it differently.

[paul3390]

How could it be possible??? Quite democratic and tolerant? Wow... What about us? Isn’t it forbidden for us too? Then, is it possible to ask the venerable lords to convey this good news to our guarantor and the Duma? We would be extremely grateful...

[tralflot1832]

Rounda is far away, Rwanda is nearby. So it seems that upon deportation everyone is given £3. If I’m not mistaken, Rwanda is the homeland of gorillas.

[Comrade]

Quote: tralflot1832

So it seems that upon deportation everyone is given £3

He will waste his money and come back. This is what the gypsies did in the Czech Republic. The Czechs paid the gypsies who agreed to leave voluntarily. They took the money, left (the ticket was free) and returned a couple of weeks later. Gild my hand again!

[Knell wardenheart]

For what reason is Rwanda so “lucky”? Is there a population shortage there?

[Anatole Klim]

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

Is there a population shortage there?

There, Hutus were slaughtered under a million Tutsis in the 90s. They carved selflessly for 10 thousand a day, before that they bought a million machetes. Now the population seems to have recovered, but nationalities are banned, they are Rwandans. The economy is growing, there are a lot of young people, but specialists are needed.

[Crimean partisan 1974]

Well, that’s great...in view of the fact that few migrants want to move from a well-fed country. ...there will be a cauldron of discontent....you just need to heat this cauldron...by the way, from the seized assets of the Russian Federation, which the empire of lies is so diligently looking for

[Yuras_Belarus]

Sunak will not be deported anywhere, calm down, gentlemen of the sofa. He has a full British passport. Those with refugee certificates and a non-British passport will be unlucky.

[know]

Normal and correct. It seems that Ukraine is destined to become a place of deportation of migrants from all over Europe - since the demographic losses there are already irreparable and irreparable, and will continue to increase. There simply won’t be a population left to control the territory - men are dying, and the “patriots” who fled abroad to Nenka will definitely not return, they didn’t run for that, Putin has fulfilled their cherished dream - to end up in “this Europe”, and not even as dishwashers, farm laborers and not wipe the asses of elderly burghers, but sit on the necks of indigenous Europeans. And this reserve of blacks and Arabs right next to us is very bad, they will crawl towards us like cockroaches from unscrupulous neighbors. But the Ukrainian Nazis will survive and, in the absence of Ukrainians themselves, they will teach these blacks and Arabs to love Bandera and Shukhevych.

[Nastia makarova]

and who will pay benefits to blacks and Arabs, for example, like in Germany?

[Orange bigg]

. But the Ukrainian Nazis will survive and, in the absence of Ukrainians themselves, they will teach these blacks and Arabs to love Bandera and Shukhevych.

Rather, blacks and Arabs will love the surviving fans of Bandera and Shukhevych.

[rotmistr60]

Britain passed a bill to deport some migrants to Rwanda

Passing a law is one thing, but catching them and then forcibly deporting them is completely different. I doubt that there are those who want to leave Britain, where they were eager to overcome so many obstacles. And will this stop the flow of migrants rushing to England? The Lords oblige everyone to catch and deliver at least 10 migrants to the deportation point.

[awdrgy]

The island is small, they can handle it. It’s all the more offensive for our Russian girl..

[Bolt cutter]

More than half of the boatmen are Albanians and Moroccans, and they clearly don’t want to sail to Rwanda instead of England. If it was difficult to deport them before, now it is easier.

[Hitriy Zhuk]

on the deportation of some migrants to Rwanda

Can one country deport citizens of another country to a third country?

[awdrgy]

Maybe, if strength and means allow.

[Hitriy Zhuk]

Quote: awdrgy

Maybe, if strength and means allow.

This is understandable, but what is it like in terms of laws?

[awdrgy]

Laws are written for the people, if necessary, overnight, but paper generally endures.

[Yuras_Belarus]

Britain has concluded an agreement with Rwanda and several other countries: you accept whoever we send out, and for this we give you a little money.

[Bolt cutter]

The law was passed. A short comment.

[Hitriy Zhuk]

What I mean is that this clearly violates everything possible.
From morality and logic, to something international (after all, it’s one thing to deport to your homeland, and another thing, I don’t know where).
Roughly speaking, then you can deport, say, a Finn from Spratland to Honduras or to Australia (so what? Conveniently, they won’t come back, and they won’t come home either).

[Bolt cutter]

then you can deport

If Rwanda doesn’t mind (and everything is paid for there), then it’s possible.

From morality and logic, to international something there

Following the logic, illegal immigrants should be imprisoned for violating the law, and then deported. But due to something international, it’s difficult to do this there.

[Grossvater]

There is no crueler taskmaster than a former slave. I'm talking about their Sunak. How long ago were his fellow tribesmen tied to guns...