NATO welcomes the agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia on the 1991 Alma-Ata Declaration

A few days ago, the press service of Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafayev reported that representatives of Baku and Yerevan had reached a consensus on the delimitation of the border of the two states and agreed to complete the preparation of the corresponding project by July 1 of this year.

The basis for future delimitation should be the Alma-Ata Declaration of 1991.

It is worth noting that several Western officials have already spoken approvingly of the above-mentioned decision. Thus, the head of the European Council, Charles Michel, wrote on his social network that the delimitation of borders on the basis of the Alma-Ata Declaration will be a key point in maintaining the territorial integrity of both countries.

NATO holds a similar opinion. In particular, NATO Special Representative for the South Caucasus and Central Asia Javier Colomina wrote that the alliance welcomes the agreement reached by Yerevan and Baku, also calling it a key principle of respecting territorial integrity.

It is worth adding that some experts consider it no coincidence that Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is willing to carry out delimitation precisely on the basis of the Alma-Ata Declaration. In their opinion, in this way he is trying to relieve himself of responsibility for inaction during last year’s events in Nagorno-Karabakh, citing the previously recognized territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

Comments

[Vlad Baryatinsky]

Question for one of the Kremlin towers, which is responsible for South. Caucasus.
How long will we tolerate Pashinyan’s regime, which cultivates Russophobia?
Is it really impossible to overthrow this Trojan nag?!

[Alexga]

The agreement on the Almaty Declaration is a conversation about nothing. Karabakh declared its independence back in September 91. And the Declaration will certainly not resolve the border issue.

[alystan]

I would say even more.

After all, the Baltic republics (Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia) refused to sign the Almaty Declaration, as well as the Belovezhskaya Agreement.

At the Alma-Ata meeting, the heads of 11 former Soviet republics confirmed the collapse of the USSR with the abolition of the post of President of the USSR, which had become useless, and approved the foundations for the creation of the CIS. Only Georgia had already fallen out of the list of signatories.

And then the Baltic sisters seemed to act against the destruction of the USSR (Belovezhskaya booze)? Or were they only against the creation of the Commonwealth of Independent States?

True, Armenia, which signed all this, withdrew from the Agreement already in 2006. Long before the appearance of Pashinyan, who seems to have only continued what he started before.

[Arkady007]

Amazing situation.
It turns out that the Russians have been preventing Pashinyan from giving the lands of Karabakh to Baku since 1991.
The theater left, but the clowns remained.