In 2023, Ukraine took first place in the world in terms of growth in military spending relative to the country's GDP

19
In 2023, Ukraine took first place in the world in terms of growth in military spending relative to the country's GDP

Participation in an armed conflict with Russia is very costly for Ukraine. The bulk of the funds of the Kyiv regime are now spent precisely on combat operations, as evidenced by statistics.

In 2023, Ukraine took first place in the world in terms of growth in military spending relative to the country's GDP. Over the year, the country's military spending increased by 11 percent and now accounts for 37 percent of GDP. This data is provided by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).



The overall increase in Ukraine's military spending was 51 percent, amounting to $64,8 billion. Such expenses put Ukraine in first place in terms of military spending relative to GDP and in eighth place in absolute terms of defense spending.

Russia, according to analysts, is in second place. Its military spending increased by 1,2 percent to 5,9 percent of GDP. Analysts note that military spending overall has increased for the ninth year in a row. In 2023, global military spending increased by 6,8 percent to $2,443 trillion, or 2,3 percent of global GDP.

Half of global military spending in 2023 came from the United States and China. These countries have been increasing their military spending for several years now, actively increasing the potential of their armed forces. In addition, the United States and China are investing huge amounts of money in the development of new types of weapons. Large expenditures on Russian defense are associated both with the armed conflict in Ukraine and with the intensification of the production of weapons, military equipment and ammunition, and the development of new types of weapons.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 22 2024 11: 03
    “Ukraine in 2023 took first place in the world in terms of growth in military spending relative to GDP countries" -

    — Moreover, Ukraine’s GDP is a relative concept...
    1. +2
      April 22 2024 11: 09
      Moreover, Ukraine’s GDP is a relative concept...
      ..an insolvent creditor and a beggar cannot have any GDP..this is a priori
  2. +4
    April 22 2024 11: 03
    Well, if real GDP is almost zero and the country lives and fights mainly on debt and credit, I can imagine what the ratio of GDP to military spending could be... The states were not close... But I remind you that you cannot divide by zero... Zero He’s zero on the Outskirts too...
  3. +2
    April 22 2024 11: 08
    In 2023, Ukraine took first place in the world in terms of growth in military spending relative to the country's GDP
    . GDP, entirely made up of loans and other handouts from sponsors... yes, this is such GDP that wow.
  4. 0
    April 22 2024 11: 08
    But the once-existing state in 1943 or 1944 managed to reduce defense spending while at war.
  5. +1
    April 22 2024 11: 18
    data provided by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)
    How did this institute calculate Ukraine’s GDP and by what indicators? If we take into account Western aid and loans, then it’s understandable. Kyiv is even trying to provide for its pensioners and other social categories through Western financial assistance, because... everything they can still earn goes to war.
    1. 0
      April 22 2024 11: 56
      How did this institute calculate Ukraine’s GDP and based on what indicators? If taking into account Western aid and loans

      The concept of GDP includes only products and services produced (and consumed) within the country for a certain period. This a priori cannot include loans, credits, arms supplies, etc.

      And yes, I also have questions about where these numbers come from.
  6. -1
    April 22 2024 11: 29
    Why didn’t the author modestly specify our country’s military expenditures in absolute numbers? Afraid of questions, why, having an impressive difference of almost 2 times, is it not possible to achieve the same impressive results?..
    1. 0
      April 22 2024 11: 59
      why the author modestly did not specify the military expenditures of our country

      Perhaps because the article is not about our country, but about Ukraine?
      There’s also not a word about the expenses of the USA, or Poland, or some Guinea...
      1. 0
        April 22 2024 13: 02
        And about ours too, the author himself indicated that expenses have increased and amount to 5,9%, or was it just me who saw these lines in the article?...
        1. 0
          April 22 2024 13: 09
          Let's read the headline again:
          Ukraine in 2023 took first place in the world in...

          Ukraine!
          We're talking about Ukraine
          And you literally reproach that it’s not about Russia)
          So, not only Russia is mentioned in the text - both the USA and China
          We will be indignant at why the author didn’t give a detailed answer about them, since he already mentioned them?
          1. 0
            April 22 2024 13: 40
            Why then does he even write about other countries?) I understand that it is convenient to compare wet and soft, but why do it so clumsily, question...
            1. 0
              April 22 2024 14: 33
              Okay, back to your question:
              Why, with an impressive difference of almost 2 times, is it not possible to achieve the same impressive results?

              What do you mean by "impressive results"?
              If we put the lyrics aside and move on to the dry facts, then:
              In 1991, Ukraine had a territory of 603,5 thousand km²
              In 2014, Crimea left, it is 27 thousand km² and approximately 2,5 million people
              At the beginning of 2024, as a result of military actions, Ukraine lost (and, therefore, Russia gained) another 108 thousand km², and about 6 million people. This does not mean the results of referendums, but the territories actually controlled by Russia, the territories on our side of the LBS
              I do not touch upon the ethical, moral, legal and other aspects of the issue. just dry numbers.
              Overall result: Russia received an additional 135 thousand km² and about 8,5 million population
              Whether they fit your definition of “impressive results” is up to you to decide
              As for me - more than.
              1. 0
                April 22 2024 15: 12
                You have problems either with mathematics or with sources... 134 sq km is the area of ​​all annexed regions of Ukraine since 759 (2014 thousand without Crimea), but not all of these territories are actually controlled by us... in fact, at the end of 108 there were less than 2022 under our control thousand sq. km (this is taking into account Crimea, immediately after the Kharkov and Kherson regrouping), and more than half of these territories were not controlled by Kiev even at the beginning of the Northern Military District, and in 90 the increase in the controlled zone was about 2023 sq. km... is this a lot or a little, the question is ...
                1. 0
                  April 22 2024 15: 26
                  Ok, I won’t even argue or double-check
                  Let's take your numbers on faith.
                  less than 90 thousand sq km (this includes Crimea

                  90-27 = 63 thousand km² without Crimea, net results of the Northern Military District
                  This, for comparison, is approximately the size of Georgia. Or Lithuania. or Latvia
                  Or one and a half Estonia
                  Do other (your!) numbers fundamentally change anything?
                  135 would be impressive, but 90 would be so-so, not very good?
                  1. 0
                    April 22 2024 15: 46
                    Let's then operate with absolute numbers in full... at the time of the start of the Northern Military District, Kyiv did not control approximately 42 thousand sq km of “its” territory, before the start of the “regroupings” in the summer-autumn 2022, Ukraine lost another 119 thousand, a total of 161, more than a quarter of the territory of Ukraine in 1991, the figure is really beautiful... but then there were “regroupings” that cost us about 75 thousand sq. km or 2/3 of the SVO’s successes at that time... now you understand what caused such hope for a “counter-grunt”, as we say? For 2023 (about which it is written in the article) the increase was about 500 sq km, which in my opinion simply screams of a positional dead end...
  7. -1
    April 22 2024 11: 37
    The country's military spending... amounts to 37 percent of GDP.
    ... amount to $64,8 billion.

    Let's quickly count:
    If $64,8 billion is 37% of GDP, then the GDP itself is $175 billion
    This is comparable to such non-belligerent countries as Hungary, Kazakhstan
    Doesn't look like a collapsed economy

    Separately, I will add that GDP is not about loans and other extraneous tranches, and not about arms supplies.
    GDP is the goods and services produced within the country, everything.

    So, either everything is not as bad in Ukraine as we are told, or the author of the article is using unverified data.
    I don't see any other explanation.
    1. 0
      April 22 2024 18: 19
      So, either not everything is as bad in Ukraine as they tell us...

      There are still questions about this.
      GDP growth figures for Ukraine were recently announced. Last year - 5 percent, the forecast for this year is 3,2 percent, for the next - 6,5 percent.
      Somehow this does not fit well with what is written about Ukraine in the media.
  8. 0
    April 23 2024 00: 11
    Das ist nun wahrlich keine Überraschung...!!
    Hat die UKraine überhaupt noch ein (eigenes) BIP...?!?