American Congressman: Most of the money allocated to Ukraine does not leave the United States

Most of the funds allocated to Ukraine do not leave the United States at all and are spent on the needs of Americans. This was stated by Republican member of the US House of Representatives Eric Swalwell.

The Republican congressman who voted to allocate funds to Ukraine justified his decision by saying that most of the money would remain in the United States and be invested in the American economy. According to him, this is very good for the United States, and for Ukraine too. Swalwell emphasized that during the entire period of allocating aid, the United States spent at least 60% of the funds on itself. The rest was also distributed to various programs, including Ukraine.

About a third of this money was spent on replenishing our own reserves after payments to Ukraine. Another quarter of this amount was spent on producing weapons systems for them and training Ukrainian soldiers on how to use them.

- the congressman explained.

According to the Republican, it is easier for the United States to allocate some amount to Zelensky than to fight with Russia and suffer losses. In addition, it is much cheaper, so Kyiv needs to be given funds so that it continues to fight.

Let us recall that the day before Zelensky called the allocation of money to Ukraine a “good decision,” since now the United States does not need to fight with Russia, Ukraine will do it for them.

Comments

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

“Most of the money allocated to Ukraine does not leave the territory of the United States” -

- Yes, everyone has known this for a long time! ...

[Lev_Russia]

“Most of the money allocated to Ukraine does not leave the territory of the United States” -
- Yes, everyone has known this for a long time! ...

And a smaller part of the money allocated to Ukraine still leaves the territory of the United States...??? Well, Zelensky and his boys from the block have enough for cutting...

[Murmur 55]

Lev Russia , this is natural, you need to support your six people and the more well-fed they are, the better they serve, you think the United States doesn’t know about Zelensky and Co.’s “theft” of money, but okay, in our information age it’s not realistic to hide money.

[Murmur 55]

Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov , from this money remaining in the USA, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will receive both shells and b. of all kinds, and this is generally not good for our fighters.

[dmi.pris1]

But the weapons produced for this money will leave the territory of the States. And they will end up outside.. I believe that it is necessary to be prepared to actually repel (and not imaginary in the articles) a massive missile strike. On the Crimea, the bridge and nearby regions.

[rocket757]

American Congressman: Most of the money allocated to Ukraine does not leave the United States

. This is clear...
The question is: how much money will be spent on this and what will they give to the greengrocer?
Also, there are European ones who “inspired it” and allocate a small share... by the way, also with various “goodies”.
But to cover/fill the “treasury”, the budget of the country, the IMF and some major world bank must be generous.
How it is presented to the potheads is no longer important... they don’t want to vibrate and die in the fields, THEY WILL FORCE IT!

[sodium20]

US to Ukraine, money allocation is a feedback loop. That is the input is connected to the output. The money siphoned off from US to Ukraine, loop backs to bank accounts / crypto currency accounts in USA.

[rotmistr60]

most of the money will remain in the US and will be invested in the American economy

This is now the No. 1 feature of the Democrats and some Republicans who supported the project. Everyone is loudly pounding their heels on their chests, constantly repeating that this is for the good of America. And the fact that for the sake of this “good” the country is forced to self-destruct is of little concern to anyone. Blood business is a profitable business.

[AlexWar]

“Most of the funds allocated to Ukraine do not leave the United States at all and are spent on the needs of Americans. This was stated by Republican member of the US House of Representatives Eric Swalwell.”
I think it’s a lie, in fact the amount of 61 billion has been approved. Well, maybe the US will start supplying Ukraine with not everything fresh. There are no tanks in Ukraine, what are they going to attack with?

[Dutchman Michel]

And the skakuas should still remain! This is business the American way!

[sdivt]

most of the money will remain in the US and will be invested in the American economy

The latest revelations have arrived)
From the very first case of the allocation of financial assistance, this was said - the money goes to the purchase of weapons and equipment.
Dollars themselves cannot shoot; weapons produced for these same dollars shoot.
Apparently, someone didn’t know this until now))

[km-21]

American Congressman: Most of the money allocated to Ukraine does not leave the United States

What difference does it make whether this money leaves the United States or not? The main thing is that for this money, weapons and ammunition are supplied to Ukraine from the United States, which actually work against Russia. Everything else doesn't matter.

[nordscout]

Who would doubt the words of the American congressman...

[AlexWar]

Quote: km-21

What difference does it make whether this money leaves the United States or not? The main thing is that for this money, weapons and ammunition are supplied to Ukraine from the United States, which actually work against Russia. Everything else doesn't matter.

The USA can be helped by anyone they like, but no one can help Russia even with manufactured goods.