NYT: Russian drones in Ukraine cause damage to one of the symbols of US military power - the Abrams tank

36
NYT: Russian drones in Ukraine cause damage to one of the symbols of US military power - the Abrams tank

When preparing last year’s “counteroffensive,” the Kiev command relied heavily on Western armored vehicles, especially Tanks. However, it quickly became obvious that the vaunted German Leopards, and later the British Challengers, which were considered invulnerable until then, as well as other armored vehicles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, were quite routinely destroyed by Russian soldiers, sometimes even before they reached the front line.

The American M1 Abrams MBTs, which Kiev had long saved from being sent to the front, were no exception. At the moment, it is known for certain that five of the 31 American tanks that the Pentagon sent to Ukraine last fall were damaged. At least three more tanks received moderate damage. What is most unpleasant for both the Ukrainian Armed Forces and their NATO allies is that many Western vehicles were disabled by UAVs. According to Russian sources, the first Abrams was hit by a domestic FPV-drone "Piranha". The manufacturing company produces 300 of these UAVs per day, so there is enough for all the armored vehicles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and there will also be left for other purposes.





American journalist Lara Jakes, known for her Russophobic publications, on the pages of The New York Times tried to answer the question of how it is that very expensive and very modern Western tanks are vulnerable to “penny” drones of the Russian Armed Forces. So the price of a drone is about $500, while a Western tank destroyed with its help costs at least ten million. The German newspaper writes that up to two-thirds of all equipment losses on both sides of the conflict occur precisely from FPV drones, which are considered one of the cheapest.

Russian Drones in Ukraine, they cause fatal damage to one of the symbols of American military power - the M1 Abrams tank

— Jakes stated an offensive fact for the “best army in the world.”

According to the Dutch military analytics website Oryx, during the military conflict in Ukraine, a total of 796 Ukrainian Armed Forces tanks were destroyed, of which 30 were German Leopards. However, what upsets the author of the NYT article most of all is the loss of the American Abrams, which, as she writes, are considered “one of the most powerful in the world.” It turned out that Abrams are destroyed by exploding drones much more easily than some US military and experts initially assumed.

Experts explain this vulnerability of tanks by the fact that UAV strikes are delivered to the least protected rear part of the engine block, where the armor is thinnest. At the same time, the drones currently used by the Russian military in Ukraine are very accurate; it is not difficult for them to hit a clearly defined location of armored vehicles. Often, drones simply finish off stationary tanks that have already been damaged by other means of destruction.

The publication quotes Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, who shortly after the arrival of American tanks said in disappointment:

It's hard for me to say that they play the most important role on the battlefield.

That is why the Ukrainian president is begging the West to send more air defense systems to destroy, first of all, drones, the author of the article in the NYT summarizes.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 20 2024 14: 30
    The German newspaper writes that up to two-thirds of all equipment losses on both sides of the conflict occur precisely from FPV drones, which are considered one of the cheapest.
    Well, yes, in two years of “actual war” the means of destruction used have changed greatly. Now there are so many of these FPV drones, of different types, that whether they are hunting for a tank or for individual soldiers...
    1. +1
      April 20 2024 15: 26
      Now there are so many of these FPV drones, of different types, that whether they are hunting for a tank or for individual soldiers...

      Of course, it’s still a spectacle... And you can’t dodge it... You dodged one, the second one dives... No evacuation groups and no nurses - no one spares them either, and on both sides... Wars are becoming more and more cruel. ..
      1. +1
        April 20 2024 15: 34
        Colleague, any religious war was cruel. The only difference with the previous ones is that the means of destruction have become more advanced.
        Our enemy, in relation to us, has a “combined” war: military for one purpose and religious for the second.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      April 20 2024 16: 07
      The information has spread that the United States seems to be asking for the Abrams to be returned to the ass; they are creating a very negative opinion about the United States in the steppes of Ukraine.
      1. +2
        April 20 2024 17: 45
        Quote: NIKNN
        The information has spread that the United States seems to be asking for the Abrams to be returned to the ass; they are creating a very negative opinion about the United States in the steppes of Ukraine.

        Haven’t they given us the bill for the damaged Abrams, Bradleys and Patriots yet?
        1. +2
          April 21 2024 00: 35
          They “hope” that this will be included in the bill from the “frozen” 300 billion (they thought).
      2. +1
        April 20 2024 19: 38
        Yes, yes, it is in the ass that you need to return to them. laughing
  2. +1
    April 20 2024 14: 31
    Their Abrams, like the rest of the nation, is “exceptional”??? But “Piranha” didn’t even know.
    1. +1
      April 20 2024 14: 36
      The Piranha-13 is especially good with an 8 kg payload and a damage radius of up to 30 km.
      1. -2
        April 20 2024 16: 44
        Ghoul and Veles are also gifts.
    2. +4
      April 20 2024 14: 36
      Quote: marchcat
      Their Abrams, like the rest of the nation, is “exceptional”??? But “Piranha” didn’t even know.

      It seems as if the Abrams had no losses in Iraq... By the end of 2006, irrecoverable losses amounted to 34 tanks, and 530 were sent back to the United States for major repairs. How many in Ukraine?
      1. +1
        April 20 2024 14: 45
        Well, how many Abrams were transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces? 31 Abrams?
        1. +3
          April 20 2024 14: 48
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          Well, how many Abrams were transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces? 31 Abrams?

          What I mean is that no one considered them prodigies, especially after 2006, when their participation in hostilities was sharply reduced. The x.o.h.l.s inflated this, and ours, for some reason, picked it up...
  3. +9
    April 20 2024 14: 34
    One of the reasons why I, at one time, subscribed to Military Review was the desire to get acquainted with information filled with specifics, new knowledge, professionalism and current news.
    After reading this article, I ask, where is all this? Water mixed with water.
    Empty, uninteresting text...
    All this has been written about dozens of times before.
    1. +1
      April 20 2024 14: 46
      All this has been written about dozens of times before.
      ... this is the “news” section on VO, if you don’t like it, then choose other sections... there is a more professional analysis of the technology itself and the database... why did you wander into the “news” section? ...just for fun...an exercise in sarcasm
      1. +1
        April 20 2024 15: 06
        What is written in the article (ostensibly news), is that news? What's new in it? Maybe, for some who are not in the know, the performance characteristics are either "Piranha", and then it is from the online publication Sputnik (open data).
        "Minus", not mine.
        1. +1
          April 20 2024 15: 12
          What is written in the article (ostensibly news), is that news?
          ...I repeat for those who are deaf but can read....THE "NEWS" SECTION...in this section they post all sorts of garbage...for the sake of laughing...is that clear? and I repeat for those who do not pay attention to the text they read....you can find out in detail about the technology and database in other sections...but I don’t care about the cons...there are a lot of idiots here
      2. 0
        April 20 2024 15: 08
        And what news did you learn in this article?
        1. -2
          April 20 2024 15: 14
          And what news did you learn in this article?
          ...news about news with which you can yell
    2. +1
      April 20 2024 14: 48
      All this has been written about dozens of times before.

      Alas, this is a disease of all media. Both electronic and paper. The main thing is views and, accordingly, money.
      1. +1
        April 20 2024 15: 16
        The main thing is views and, accordingly, money.
        ...not really views...look at the amount of advertising on the right...this is exactly the income on VO...and indeed on all sites
  4. +3
    April 20 2024 14: 36
    At the beginning of the Northern Military District, no one could have imagined that cheap UAVs would become one of the decisive forces on the battlefield.
    And a combination of a reconnaissance UAV, an FPV drone and artillery can disrupt any attack by enemy equipment... not to mention the infantry.
    Now it is impossible to imagine a battlefield without UAVs of all types and purposes.
  5. -1
    April 20 2024 14: 39
    At the moment, it is known for certain that five out of 31 American tanks were damaged.
    ...that is, the remaining 26 pig-nosed dermocracy refuse to serve? somehow it’s not gender specific
  6. 0
    April 20 2024 14: 40
    — “Time passes, symbols change” ...
  7. +2
    April 20 2024 14: 53
    "... send air defense systems to destroy, first of all, drones."
    You see drones on the battlefield, and not weapons that hit the infrastructure on dill every night.
    What kind of means are there? Patriot? IRIS-T? Catching nets? "Kulemeti"?
    A stupid journalist, far from reality, lists well-known facts and draws appropriate conclusions.
    Yes, the fight against small but nasty UAVs is becoming one of the main components of the battle. This is clear even without the New York newspaper. But to effectively combat them, you don’t need super-expensive air defense systems.
    There is an urgent need to improve both technically and organizationally electronic warfare. So that they know when and where to turn it on, and when to urgently turn it off, etc.
    But we also need means to destroy the “birds”. Shells with remote detonation, fighter drones and, probably, powerful shotguns - grapeshots as the last line of defense. Air defense against tactical UAVs should be carried out by special units in a company, battalion, or regiment. And there is no need to delay this. Mobile groups in cars with machine guns or chargers to fight drones attacking our cities were organized only a couple of months ago, although the Ukrainian has had them for a long time
  8. +3
    April 20 2024 15: 20
    We need to write more about the damaged Abrams, show more photos and videos. This will be their best advertisement
  9. HAM
    0
    April 20 2024 15: 29
    What can only be said about “Abrams” - it’s hard to be a “god” .... and the states still have “gods” that people in the West pray to ... only dear ones ...
  10. 0
    April 20 2024 15: 35
    At the moment, it is known for certain that five out of 31 American tanks were damaged.
    It is known for certain about seven......
  11. 0
    April 20 2024 16: 02
    What kind of power is the "abrashka"? Yes, power.
  12. +1
    April 20 2024 16: 17
    According to the Dutch military analytics site Oryx, during the military conflict in Ukraine, a total of 796 Ukrainian Armed Forces tanks were destroyed

    WOW! As many as 796? And what do they write in this publication about the human losses of the Ukrovermacht? Probably 15-17 thousand? And those - along with the wounded?
    1. 0
      April 20 2024 18: 28
      Quote: Peter_Koldunov
      Probably 15-17 thousand? And those - along with the wounded

      They would write with pleasure, but the president has already announced thirty-one thousand losses.
  13. +1
    April 20 2024 18: 34
    Experts explain this vulnerability of tanks by the fact that UAV strikes are delivered to the least protected rear part of the engine block, where the armor is thinnest

    In other words, the cheap drones made on the knee do the same thing as the hyped high-tech Javelins - they simply hit from above, where the weakest defense is. Moreover, at a range of up to 30 km, instead of three and without dancing with a tambourine around the timely cooling of the matrix.
  14. +1
    April 20 2024 19: 47
    "...symbols of US military power - the Abrams tank..." - and who considers it a symbol of military power? Have the Americans convinced themselves of this and are going crazy? Where did he actually fight, and not shoot “guys in slippers”? So he came to war and raked.... symbol....
  15. 0
    April 20 2024 19: 50
    When preparing last year’s “counteroffensive,” the Kiev command relied heavily on Western armored vehicles, especially tanks.

    And in the coming “counter-offensive” they are relying on the F-16... request
  16. 0
    April 20 2024 21: 02
    The symbol of military power of any country is modern thermonuclear weapons and their means of delivery... And a tank, no matter how “cunningly crafted” it is, is a “consumable material” of the battlefield, nothing more.... Tanks, airplanes, their quality and quantity were decisive and decisive in the theater of operations in that last war... I agree that in local military operations a tank solves many problems, but the decisive “point” in any military conflict or in a “full-fledged” war will be delivered by modern tactical nuclear weapons or strategic nuclear weapons. The enemy’s assumption that thermonuclear weapons can be used against him is the most convincing factor in maintaining a genetic “sense of healthy vigilance” in the enemy, which cannot be compared with tank and aviation armadas in the form of the T-14 and SU-57. ...
  17. 0
    April 21 2024 14: 14
    CHINESE(!) drones cause damage to Russian and Western equipment. Yes, honestly.