"St. Louis Bible": the most illustrated Bible in the world

25
"St. Louis Bible": the most illustrated Bible in the world
It is possible that this is exactly what the knights looked like, and the King of Spain Alfonso X the Wise himself, who received the “St. Louis Bible” as a gift. Still from the television series "Sid Compeador". True, Sid himself and all the kings he served lived 200 years before the reign of Alfonso X, but progress in the field of weapons at that time was extremely slow. So this appearance of them is quite acceptable!


“Do not let this book of the law depart from your mouth; but study in it day and night, so that you do exactly everything that is written in it: then you will be successful in your ways and will act wisely.”
Joshua 1:18

Literature of the Middle Ages. Over time, the spread of literacy and an increase in the total number of books in medieval Europe led to the appearance of not only copies of ancient books, but also independent works that supplemented them. Moreover, at first these were again the same biblical texts, but with comments and explanations. This is how the so-called “biblical moralizing” appeared - books that, in addition to excerpts from biblical texts, included many illustrations and explanations, both to these texts themselves and to the illustrations that explained them. Well, the “richest” in terms of illustrations today is the “St. Louis Bible”, or, as it is also called, the “Rich Bible”, which is a moralizing on biblical themes in three volumes and containing as many as 4898 miniatures on its pages*.



On each page you can see various episodes of the Old and New Testaments. And then there are illustrations that explain them from the point of view of the religious morality of that time. Moreover, each passage is dedicated not to one, which would be quite logical, but to two miniatures at once. In the first, the event is depicted as such, but the second miniature explains this fragment of text in the light of church teaching. Moreover, all illustrations are accompanied by texts from the Bible and, in addition, brief comments about the relationship between the two “pictures”.


Page 58 of the “Toledo Bible” (this is another of the names of this manuscript). It depicts scenes from the book of Leviticus. Since the manuscript does not contain the complete text of the Bible, it is not a real Bible, despite its name. Most likely, this is some kind of teaching aid for the young king

We also know that it was compiled between 1226 and 1234 for King Louis IX of France (b. 1214) at the request of his mother Blanche of Castile. For the last eight centuries, the manuscript has been kept in the Cathedral of Toledo, with the exception of a fragment of eight leaves, which are in the Morgan Library and Museum in New York.

The first mention of this unique illuminated manuscript is contained in the will of the Spanish King Alfonso the Wise, dated January 10, 1284, which contains mention of “an illustrated Bible in three volumes, given to us by King Louis of France.” Moreover, the will clearly meant Louis IX, since Fernando III, Alfonso’s father, was his cousin, which implies close ties between the royal houses of France and Castile. After the death of the king, the Bible went to his son Sancho. Then in 1466 it was described by Gabriel Tetzel, a patrician from Nuremberg, and even later it was mentioned in the inventory of the treasures of Toledo Cathedral in 1539. It is interesting that by this time the so-called “Morgan fragment” had been removed from it, which became its kind of fourth volume.

The pages of the manuscript are laid out as follows: on each page there are two columns, each with four miniatures in medallions. The top miniature of each pair is an illustration of the text of the Old Testament, while the bottom one shows the reader an equivalent scene from the New Testament or a scene with some allegorical or mystical meaning of the Old Testament stories. In addition to the thumbnails, the page also has two narrow columns with text explaining the pictures.

The text columns are 25 mm wide, the medallion columns are 75 mm wide.

Interestingly, only one side of each sheet was used for illustrations and text, leaving the other side blank, doubling the workload and making this Bible extremely expensive. The colored sheets were arranged in spreads, that is, when it was opened, two colored pages were visible, and the next ones remained blank.

The miniatures were painted against a background of polished gold, and a very rich palette of colors was used: blue, green, red, yellow, gray, orange and sepia. It is interesting that the illustrators, in their miniatures from a monastic point of view and the Bible, largely critically examine their contemporary society, depicting its vices and virtues. And thanks to their efforts to reflect the life of their time as accurately as possible, we see his clothes today, and we can even get an idea of ​​some customs. In accordance with the spirit of the times, this Bible, like other moralizing works of this era, also contains many anti-Semitic miniatures.


The so-called “Miniature of Authorship”. There are no signatures of the authors or their names on it. But there is a picture of two monks working on a book, and a young king and queen

Now let's imagine how much work and skill the creators of this book had to put into drawing all these 4898 miniatures in the first place. After all, these are not just images of some individual biblical characters with captions, such as “God”, “Adam”, “Eve”, “Noah” and so on, but images with a recognizable plot, with meaning, designed for a visual impact on the reader or , or rather, the person looking at them. But with such a huge number of miniatures, by the way, executed on pages in a very small format, a very thoughtful selection of subjects for illustrations was required, that is, in modern language, a very competent art editor, or even an entire editorial council involved in the selection of illustrative material for this manuscript.


A page from the Morgan Fragment. The miniatures carefully depict scenes of the crucifixion of Christ along with two robbers. Despite the small size of the figures, their faces and clothes, everything is drawn out extremely carefully. At the same time, the text between the illustrations is very, very laconic

And here it should be noted that the “St. Louis Bible” is by no means something unique. It is part of four early morality Bibles created between 1220 and 1234. That is, all this editorial work carried out by the “creative teams” of monks, the creators of such books, took place not only in one monastery, but... in several. Because although they are all very similar to each other, they also differ in a number of interpretations, and, of course, in design. But this only means that, despite the complexity of creating and the high cost of such books, their “production” has, to some extent, already been put on stream. That is, there was a demand for them in society, and the creators of such morality books tried to satisfy it to the best of their ability.

* The first volume contains 1529 miniatures, the second - 1792, the third - 1520, and the fourth, from the Pierpont Morgan Library and Museum - 57!
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 25 2024 06: 16
    Thanks Vyacheslav Olegovich.
    The printing press is perhaps the most “productive” achievement of mankind.
    All the good days!
    1. +4
      April 25 2024 07: 19
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      the most “productive” achievement of humanity.

      Exactly! The beginning of the "information revolution".
    2. +3
      April 25 2024 07: 52
      The printing press, perhaps the most “productive” achievement of mankind
      But some of the classics of literature, on the contrary, hated Gutenberg because he invented typos! wink
      1. +4
        April 25 2024 08: 23
        This phrase is attributed to Victor Hugo.
        1. +2
          April 25 2024 11: 25
          This phrase is attributed to Victor Hugo
          Stanislaw Lem, Polish science fiction writer
      2. +5
        April 25 2024 08: 38
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        he invented typos!

        And before that there were mistakes...
        1. +5
          April 25 2024 11: 26
          Quote: Dutchman Michel
          he invented typos!
          Caliber
          And before that there were mistakes...

          Come on, hasn’t more than one stone carver made a mistake?
          The only thing is that even an ax won’t save you here. Although no matter how you look at it, history knows examples of heads being chopped off for less.
          Historical anecdote.
          At the review of the Baltic fleet, the imperial couple in the person of Alexander II and his wife take part in the parade. Looking at the cruiser Rurik passing by, Her Majesty, rubbing her husband’s hand in her ear, whispers how big this Belly Button is. The Emperor sadly looks around the formation of ships and the ship notices Izher’s transport and whispers in his wife’s ear, “darling, please don’t mention the name of the third boat from the end.”
          1. +3
            April 25 2024 18: 01
            Come on, hasn’t more than one stone carver made a mistake?
            Most likely, I was not mistaken. Imagine how much time it takes to knock out some symbol or runes on a stone with a chisel (or whatever else it is). Before hitting with a hammer, the ancient chronicler thought more than once. The same applies to book scribes in scriptoriums, where each letter was written in calligraphy.
          2. +1
            April 25 2024 22: 10
            Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
            the imperial couple represented by Alexander II and his wife

            The “Rurik” that was at the time of the Liberator is relatively small)))
        2. +3
          April 25 2024 18: 05
          And before that there were mistakes
          Carefully writing text with a pen does not mean clicking on the keyboard with your fingers or writing with a ballpoint pen. Excluded! wink
          1. +3
            April 25 2024 20: 38
            Quote: Dutchman Michel
            Carefully writing text with a pen does not mean clicking on the keyboard with your fingers or writing with a ballpoint pen. Excluded!

            But they were!
  2. +8
    April 25 2024 09: 25
    Still from the television series "Sid Compeador".
    I'll correct it. The series is called "Sid" (El Sid), and it's really good! The creators did not skimp on either the costumes or the extras. Perhaps one of the best productions about the Middle Ages that I have seen.
    Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -1
      April 25 2024 12: 39
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      Perhaps one of the best productions about the Middle Ages that I have seen.
      And do you have anything to compare with? Have you seen that same “Middle Ages” live somewhere? And if you haven’t seen it, how are you sure that at least something in the series “Sid” (El Sid) corresponds to reality?
      The problem is that you, like a huge number of others, especially “historians,” compare modern ideas about something ancient not with how it really happened there, because no one knows this, but with your opinion about how it could have happened there. occur, which is developed by digesting the mass of fiction read. Including dissertations - which are also a kind of fiction.
      1. +5
        April 25 2024 12: 52
        Quote: Seal
        The problem is that you, like a huge number of others, especially “historians,” compare modern ideas about something ancient not with how it really happened there, because no one knows this, but with your opinion about how it could have happened there. occur, which is developed by digesting the mass of fiction read. Including dissertations - which are also a kind of fiction.

        He compares this film with the Hollywood one, which was filmed there. We know exactly how it was “back then” and very well. There are effigies, there are miniatures from manuscripts. And if they match the costumes from the film, it is a good film in terms of historical setting. If they don’t match, then it’s “Hollywoodism.” Here on VO there were several of my articles on effigies. It tells in detail what significance they have for the study of history. By the way, I not only saw many of the effects in person, but also touched them. That is, it was close to what the masters who completed them saw!
        1. 0
          April 25 2024 22: 42
          In January I already wrote about fantasies about the oath of 842.
          The author imperatively states that:
          The text of the oath of 842 has survived to this day and became the first document in the history of Germany and France.

          Based on the context, it follows that supposedly a certain document has actually been preserved, on which there are someone’s living signatures or seals. But that's not true. A little digging into the topic shows that there is no document. It is stated that
          The text was preserved as part of the Latin-language work of the historian Nitgard “On the discord of the sons of Louis the Pious.” Nitgard was contemporary with the events described and wrote shortly after them

          So, at this stage we see that even according to the official version of history, the text of the oath was “preserved”, but not in the form of a document, but in the form in which a certain Nitgard wrote it down. I don’t know how it is for anyone, but I already associate this with the anecdote in which Abram tells Isaac that Chaliapin sings poorly and out of tune.
          But that's not all. If anyone thinks that the original manuscript of this Nitgard reached the times of historical materialism, then he is mistaken. It is stated that
          Nithard's work has come down to us in a single 10th-century manuscript, originating from the library of the Abbey of Saint-Médard in Soissons

          Oh, how can this be, because at the same time it is stated that Nitgard died back in the 9th century, in 844. And here is a manuscript from the XNUMXth century. How so ?
          By the way, we still need to figure out when this manuscript, which after all of the above, being of sound mind and solid memory, of course cannot be called either a document or a manuscript of Nitgard, but should be called a “manuscript of an unknown author”, ended up in the library of the Abbey of Saint-Médard in Soissons.
          After all, it is claimed that this is an abbey
          However, the abbey also had to endure a number of disasters. Around 884 it was sacked by the Normans[2]; in 886 it was attacked by the Vikings and later by the Hungarians. Paris gradually became the center of royal power, and Soissons, and with it the abbey, faded into the background. The monastery experienced a new flourishing in the XNUMXth century: it was rebuilt and a new temple was consecrated. Construction continues in the XNUMXth century

          That is, when the library appeared in the abbey is unknown, but according to the official version of history, no earlier than the 13th century.
          But, I repeat, for some reason what is written everywhere is what the author rewrote, namely
          The text of the oath of 842 has survived to this day and became the first document in the history of Germany and France.


          As Stanislav E. Lec said, if you remove all the lies from history, this does not mean at all that only the truth will remain - as a result, there may be nothing left at all
    3. +1
      April 29 2024 11: 44
      Good afternoon - The outlaw king is very good.
  3. +3
    April 25 2024 10: 31
    The miniature of the crucifixion of Christ was the clothing from the time when it was painted or from the time when it happened?
    I suspect that Christ and the thieves were dressed in “modern” clothes.
  4. +3
    April 25 2024 12: 07
    . at first these were again the same biblical texts, but with commentaries and explanations. This is how the so-called “biblical moralizing” appeared - books that, in addition to excerpts from biblical texts, included many illustrations and explanations, both to these texts themselves and to the illustrations that explained them.

    It turns out that all of Vyacheslav Olegovich’s articles on VO are the Bible, and the comments to them are “biblical moralizing” wassat )))
    Good day to all “moralizers”! )))
    The end of the work week is approaching, the winds sweep away time, carry its grains of sand somewhere to the north, and with them the atoms of life, revealing fatigue from everything crying
  5. +3
    April 25 2024 12: 31
    It is generally accepted that the first reference to this Bible (the St. Louis Bible) can be found in the second will of Alfonso the Wise, dated January 10, 1284. This will mentioned “an illustrated Bible in three volumes, given to us by King Louis of France.” The will was written in Spanish. The original was lost, but an early copy reads as follows: “E mandamos otrosi, que las dos biblias et tres libros de letra gruesa, cobiertas de plata, é la otra en tres libros estoriada que nos dió el rey Luis de Francia, é la nuestra tabla con las reliquias, e las coronas con las piedras é con los camafeos é sortijas, é otras nobles que perteneçen al Rey, que lo aya todo aquel que con derecho por nos heredare el nuestro señorío mayor de Castilla é León." After Alfonso's death, his wills were translated into Latin, and the original translations are still available.
    That is, the original will itself (written in Castigliano, probably, since there was no common Spanish language yet), in which, according to the author, this Bible was mentioned, as usual, it was not preserved. Only subsequent copies in Latin survive. How subsequent is the question.
  6. +3
    April 25 2024 12: 46
    The illustrations in this Bible are truly beautiful. I did some research and found some really interesting and beautiful medieval texts, and also found the Book of Hours of Amiens, which has a very specific shape: the shape of a lily. Chansonnier in the shape of a heart. Anne Boleyn's psalm is the smallest and most curious. Codex purpureus rossanensis, considered the most colorful, consists of 14 pages of drawings on sheets of purple-red color.
    1. +4
      April 25 2024 20: 42
      Quote from: Semovente7534
      The Book of Hours of Amiens, which has a very specific shape: the shape of a lily. Chansonnier in the shape of a heart.

      The article about the books of hours of the Middle Ages (before 1500) is ready. But there are several tens of thousands of them, and even the best ones are so numerous that even just listing them is hard work. Therefore, I wrote only about some of the most famous or, on the contrary, rare ones. Coming soon...
      1. +2
        April 26 2024 12: 24
        I wrote this simply to continue the discussion about the strange and special books of the Middle Ages.
        1. +2
          April 26 2024 15: 21
          Quote from: Semovente7534
          I wrote this simply to continue the discussion about the strange and special books of the Middle Ages.

          And THANK YOU for that!
  7. +3
    April 25 2024 16: 04
    Work on the Bible, interpretations, interpretations, councils, heresies and the fight against them, iconoclasm and the fight against it - the essence of that time, the Middle Ages. And such creativity in popularizing the Bible is like theater, cinema and several other types of art at once; only extraordinary and enthusiastic people could work on such a masterpiece for years, passing through all the comprehension of the texts in order to illustrate them.
  8. +1
    April 25 2024 21: 48
    Quote: kalibr
    We know exactly how it was “back then” and very well. There are effigies, there are miniatures from manuscripts.
    What manuscripts? I gave an analysis of this “St. Louis Bible”. This Bible does not have its own date of writing. It is impossible to date it based on its contents, because it is not a document, but a religious text. The characters depicted in the pictures of the Bible are, so to speak, “identified” on the basis of the personal feelings of historians. The name is also a convention, that is, an agreement among historians.
    Its entire connection to “that very time” is based on the fact that this Bible is mentioned in the will of Alfonso the Wise.
    And I already figured this out. I'll say it again.
    It is generally accepted that the first reference to this Bible (the St. Louis Bible) can be found in the second will of Alfonso the Wise, dated January 10, 1284. This will mentioned “an illustrated Bible in three volumes, given to us by King Louis of France.” The will was written in Spanish. The original was lost, but an early copy reads as follows: “E mandamos otrosi, que las dos biblias et tres libros de letra gruesa, cobiertas de plata, é la otra en tres libros estoriada que nos dió el rey Luis de Francia, é la nuestra tabla con las reliquias, e las coronas con las piedras é con los camafeos é sortijas, é otras nobles que perteneçen al Rey, que lo aya todo aquel que con derecho por nos heredare el nuestro señorío mayor de Castilla é León." After Alfonso's death, his wills were translated into Latin, and the original translations are still available.
    That is, the original will itself (written in Castigliano, probably, since there was no common Spanish language yet), in which, according to the author, this Bible was mentioned, as usual, has not been preserved. Only subsequent copies in Latin survive.
    Yes, historians, again based solely on their personal feelings, say that “The Testament of Alfonso the Wise was copied in Latin shortly after his death".
    But the question is - what does “soon” mean? A month later ? In a year ? After 10 years ? 100 years later ? In 200 years? This is unknown.
    Accordingly, it is unknown to what extent these copies of the will correspond to the original, if, of course, there was an original at all. And it is absolutely impossible to clearly determine when in one of the, so to speak, “copies” of the will of Alfonso the Wise, the first mention of the St. Louis Bible appeared.