A new bill on the total mobilization of Ukrainian citizens has been sent to Zelensky for signature

Ukraine is preparing for the entry into force of a new bill on total mobilization; the document remains to be signed only by Zelensky. Ukrainian media reported this.

The scandalous bill, adopted by deputies of the Verkhovna Rada under strong pressure from the authorities, according to Ukrainian resources, was sent for Zelensky’s signature. Prior to this, the document was signed by Rada Speaker Stefanchuk. It is expected that the bill will be signed within two weeks, after which it will come into force. Although a faster signing option is possible, since the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is rushing the authorities, announcing a large shortage of manpower on the front line.

As previously reported, at the first stage the Kiev junta plans to put at least 350-500 thousand new military personnel under arms. This is to compensate for losses and allow for brigade rotations. In the future, the number of mobilized should increase to one million; Zelensky is going on a “liberation” campaign to the 1991 borders. This is why additional funding from the United States is so important for Kyiv, because Ukraine does not have its own money to maintain such an army.

Meanwhile, as some more or less adequate Ukrainian public pages write, dissatisfaction with Zelensky and the new commander-in-chief Syrsky is brewing in the Ukrainian Armed Forces. One of the main reasons for this was the removal of the demobilization provision from the new bill. According to the Ukrainian military, even if demobilization would have taken place after 36 months, it would have given an illusory hope of returning home. Now the dry land people are deprived of this too.

Comments

[Vend]

Well, until the last Ukrainian, that means until the last. We didn't invent this.

[Dutchman Michel]

removal of the demobilization provision from the new bill

But the bill clearly covers the provision on burial

[Lev_Russia]

Ukraine is preparing for the entry into force of a new bill on total mobilization; the document remains to be signed only by Zelensky.

This one will sign everything now, well, at least out of fear for his chair and his life... Out of a sense of self-preservation... He has already cut off all the loose ends for himself to retreat a long time ago and now he is an ordinary puppet of the Anglo-Saxons... If they want to, they will cut the strings and abandon to be torn to pieces, and there are plenty of people who want to end this nit in Ukraine...

[reaper]

What do we have in connection with this event? How do you plan to keep such a horde of mobilized dry landers? Will our armed forces cope like last year?
I really hope so.

[Ivan Ivanov_36]

If there is no money, they will not mobilize anyone.

[Mouse]

stating a large shortage of manpower on the front line

It won’t take long for us to make them not living and not force....

[rotmistr60]

Zelensky is going on a “liberation” campaign to the 1991 borders

When you take a deep breath through your nostril, even this will not seem enough. Another incident will happen with the “liberation campaign,” but Ukrainians will be zealously gathered for destruction.

[dmi.pris1]

Total mobilization? In history, this was in the winter of 44-45 in Germany. They really scooped everyone out. Let's look at the population of Kyiv or Lvov. If the nightclubs are full, then everything is still to come..

[sdivt]

plans to put at least 350–500 thousand new military personnel under arms

Humanly speaking, of course, it’s a pity for each of them, but, by and large, this is their country, these are their laws, this is their president. So that's their problem.
I'm interested in another question.
If the number of personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine sharply increases by one and a half times (if not more), will this not be followed by the need to increase the number of personnel of the RF Armed Forces?

[Ivan Ivanov_36]

Well, they will recruit soldiers. Without air defense cover, without shells, without funding, you won’t fight for long. There will simply be a higher density of soldiers and a higher mortality rate. Not 300-500 losses per day, but 600-800.
This whole game is All-In on the river with two unpaired cards, a deuce and a seven.

[dmi.pris1]

What makes you think that they don’t have shells or funding? Maybe they lack something, military air defense, for example. Judging by what’s happening on the front line, they have enough weapons for defensive actions.

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

“As previously reported, at the first stage the Kiev junta plans to put at least 350-500 thousand new military personnel under arms” -

— As soon as the acting law President Zelensky will sign, will these 350-500 thousand themselves run “under the gun”?
(You need to get more “guns” for them somewhere) ...

[Yaro Polk]

the stinking drug addict will still make enemies with his 15-decimeter nosed carcass... after signing under this document)

[JÜRGEN WEGNER]

And how it was during the Second World War.

When was demobilization announced in the USSR?

Everyone there went to the end. Or is it not?

Strange guys in Ukraine. For example, there is a battle going on, and then demobilization is announced?

That's it, have you packed your belongings and gone home? So you need to convince that demobilization will be in a week.

That's it, our winners.

[sdivt]

Quote from JÜRGEN WEGNER

And how it was during the Second World War.
When was demobilization announced in the USSR?
Everyone there went to the end. Or is it not?

Are you now putting the USSR and today's Ukraine on the same level?
Seriously?

[JÜRGEN WEGNER]

Hi,
I didn't claim this. I’m talking about the general understanding of mobilization and dismissal from the ranks of the Armed Forces during hostilities.

[Ghost1]

Total mobilization is for the male population from the age of 18, but it is also planned to take it from the age of 24 or 25.
And who writes that they don’t have money and weapons for such a horde of people, but the West will scrape together both money and weapons for the sake of this matter.