What Norway is looking for in the Russian sector of the Barents Sea

31
What Norway is looking for in the Russian sector of the Barents Sea


It's the Arctic, baby!


The Norwegian Storting has not pleased Russia for a long time, and especially today. Already at the beginning of the year, its deputies overwhelmingly supported the government's proposal to allow exploration and test production in the deep-sea Norwegian sectors of the Barents, Greenland, Norwegian and North Seas.



The Arctic is a very complicated region in terms of rights to everything, from land and coastal property to marine resources. At the moment, we are talking about a vast shelf area of ​​281 thousand square meters. km. Moreover, it also includes part of the new Norwegian Barents sector, included in Norway.

Official Oslo managed to negotiate this sector from Moscow, thanks to the agreement signed in Murmansk in 2010 with the Russian Federation on the delimitation of maritime spaces in the Barents Basin and the Arctic Ocean (AOC)…

According to the profile Russian portal (December 2023), not only Norwegian, but also many Scandinavian business structures welcomed the mentioned government proposal and the decision of the Storting.” The first to do so was seabed mining startup Loke Marine Minerals, “backed by major investors such as Norwegian oil services company Technip FMC and Norwegian offshore group Wilhelmsen.

At the same time, since 2023, the Norwegian authorities have been calling on the kingdom’s oil companies to intensify plans to develop fields in the Barents Sea. In the same year, the Norwegian government held a license auction, during which 92 subsoil blocks on the country’s continental shelf were allocated for further exploration and development: 78 blocks in the Barents Sea and 14 in the Norwegian Sea.

Refuse transfer!


A report by the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) in 2023 reported huge deposits of natural resources on the Norwegian shelf, including the Barents Sea - not only oil and gas, but also millions of tons of copper, zinc, cobalt, rare earth metals (neodymium and the completely unique dysprosium – No. 66 in the periodic table).

Norway is striving to quickly “capitalize” the resources of the Barents sector, which has become Norwegian since 2010, in view of the aforementioned agreement signed with Russia. And this is no coincidence - in Russia, starting from 2022, a line has been drawn to suspend the validity of this document.

Thus, State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin in July 2022 instructed the Parliamentary Committee on International Affairs to “study the issue of denunciation or suspension” of the well-known agreement between Russia and Norway. Where they discussed, among other things, the delimitation of maritime spaces and cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean.

And the point is not only that, according to many Russian experts, about 100 thousand square meters. km of the Barents shelf water area was transferred to Norway without sufficient objective reasons. We must not forget that very large oil and gas resources are concentrated in this segment of the water area, not to mention the presence there of significant reserves of various fish resources.

In 2023, there was no official progress on this issue from the Russian side. And the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated in 2022 that this document is not subject to denunciation, because “this type of agreement is valid indefinitely.”

However, this statement is very controversial, since Norway partially revised, de jure or de facto, in the 50s, 80s and later its shelf borders with Iceland, Danish Greenland and the Faroe Islands on their initiative. In addition, as State Duma Vice Speaker Konstantin Kosachev notes,

“Every state, by virtue of its sovereignty, has the right to freely accede to any international treaty, terminate or suspend its participation in it: this is Art. 38–39 of the federal law “On international treaties of the Russian Federation”. Also, the effect of the agreement “can be suspended or terminated, citing a fundamental change in the circumstances that existed at the conclusion of the agreement: this is Art. 62 of the Vienna Convention of 1969 “On the Law of International Treaties”.

Unoccupied area


The section of the Barents Sea shelf, which Russia transferred to Norway in 2010 under an agreement on the delimitation of maritime spaces in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean, turned out to be an extremely rich oil and gas province. According to the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD), seismic exploration in subsequent years showed the presence of at least 1,9 billion barrels of hydrocarbons (15% of them oil) in the area that were economically exploitable.

These data are already available by the beginning of the 2020s. raised the estimate of Norway's recoverable offshore reserves by 11% to 18,7 billion barrels. And Oslo urgently needs new oil and gas resources. After all, their production, especially in the North Sea, is steadily declining due to the aging and depletion of previous deposits used since the mid-1970s - early 80s.

Production here fell to a 25-year low back in the mid-2010s. In this regard, “The southeast of the Barents Sea (up to 40% of this water area since 2010 is the Norwegian part... - Author’s note) is the most interesting of the new areas of the Norwegian continental shelf,” noted in an interview with the Barents Observer (Oslo) Geir Seljeseth, External Relations Manager, Norwegian Petroleum Association.


However, for Russia, they say, “the value of these resources is in doubt, since the labor and capital intensity of offshore production significantly exceeds the indicators for other Russian fields.”

A gift, but not for you!


Naturally, Norway’s receipt of such a significant gift cannot but be accompanied by opinions about the supposed unprofitability of ex-Russian oil and gas resources for the Russian Federation... The point is also that the expansion of the Norwegian Barents borders brings the military-political confrontation between NATO and Russia closer to the borders of Russia.

Moreover, in Norway, which is among the oldest members of NATO, the authorities have already made it clear that they are not against sending NATO “military advisers and instructors,” including Norwegian ones, to Ukraine. This factor must certainly be taken into account when finalizing the issue of the Barents agreement between Russia and Norway.

Meanwhile, in 1926–1932. Oslo's claims extended to almost the entire Barents waters and even to the Franz Josef Land archipelago. In 1932, a group of Norwegian “enthusiasts” installed Norwegian flags here instead of Soviet ones.

Moscow presented Oslo with an ultimatum, warning of a military operation to restore Soviet sovereignty in the archipelago. In Norway they decided not to take risks. And at international negotiations on maritime boundaries in the North Atlantic in 1932–1933. The USSR supported Norwegian sovereignty on the islands of Jan Mayen (east of Danish Iceland), Nadezhda and Bear (southeast of Spitsbergen).

Around the same period, Moscow recognized the sovereignty of Norway on Bouvet Island in the south Atlantic and in the adjacent waters. Oslo unexpectedly promptly “responded” by renouncing claims to the Franz Josef Archipelago and the adjacent part of the Barents Sea.

But, let us repeat, in 2010, Oslo’s claims in the western part of this basin - north of the Murmansk region - were crowned with success...
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +24
    April 18 2024 04: 50
    In the Kremlin, they are constantly stepping on the old rake of giving gifts to our enemies... Mr. Medvedev, this is your mistake... eliminate it yourself once you mess up.
    1. +21
      April 18 2024 06: 29
      Come on! A LADY can only scratch her tongue from the podium and spit in the direction of her enemies
      1. +9
        April 18 2024 07: 34
        Quote from: dmi.pris1
        The mayor of Murmansk Igor Morar, the daughter of the richest deputy of the region Viktor Saigin and the head of the exhibition center “Nuclear icebreaker “Lenin”” Alexander Timofeev, allegedly took possession of three cottages in the Norwegian Arctic near NATO facilities.

        That's what they write in Novye Izvestia.
        1. +5
          April 18 2024 07: 50
          So these are SVR agents?? belay
        2. +5
          April 18 2024 08: 56
          Civilian. And the coolest thing is that these cottages were rented by the military of Norway and NATO countries. There is a serious scandal in Norway, how is this possible - Russians are everywhere. bully And how many fishing bases have the Russians bought in northern Norway for sport fishing? New Izvestia doesn’t write? And in general, Kirkenes (Kirsanovka) is already a third Russian city.
      2. +9
        April 18 2024 11: 30
        Not true. negative Medvedev not only scratches, but also controls time through time zones, for which he is cast in granite for centuries as the Lord of Winter Time.
    2. +6
      April 18 2024 08: 18
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Mr. Medvedev, this is your mistake...fix it yourself once you mess up.


      This is more likely a party bug than a personal mistake). After all, the State Duma in 2011 approved the law on the ratification of this agreement, 311 deputies from United Russia voted for....and who was our party chairman from May 7, 2008 - May 26, 2012? Anyone who wants to can google it... so apparently there is a collective decision.
      1. +7
        April 18 2024 08: 33
        Aleksandr21(Alexander)
        I will supplement your comment with excerpts from works written by the poet Alexei Zhemchuzhnikov:

        “Having made the trek to nihilism
        And looking around, not without gloating,
        They went into patriotism
        And they set about embezzlement."
        (“Into an album of modern portraits”, 1890)

        “How did it happen to you one day,
        So, apparently, it will continue:
        Although not everyone robs a patriot,
        But no matter what the thief, he is a patriot.”
        (“The Tale of the Stupid Demon and the Wise Patriot”, 1883)
      2. +7
        April 18 2024 08: 49
        Quote: Aleksandr21
        This is more likely a party bug than a personal mistake)

        That's enough for you, my friend! When did the party vote against a proposal put forward “from above”? And LADIES in this chain are not yet the very top! wink
      3. +3
        April 18 2024 13: 18
        Quote: Aleksandr21
        After all, the State Duma in 2011 approved the law ratifying this agreement

        And it's not the only one...
        In 2004 - to China.
        https://lenta.ru/articles/2004/10/20/island/

        In 2010, Norway.
        https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/articles/2013/03/04/rossiya-podarila-norvegii-11-ee-shelfovyh-zapasov-uglevodorodov

        In 2013 - to Azerbaijan.
        http://www.iarex.ru/interviews/37995.html
        Azerbaijan was even given to residents. 2 villages of citizens of the Russian Federation.

        And each time there were the same excuses - "to settle long-standing territorial disputes and demarcate borders." "Our investments in the development of territories are too high", etc.

        Nedimon was “president” there only once. And then, we all know who really made the decisions.
    3. 0
      April 23 2024 13: 32
      It is clear that Medvedev will not and cannot correct anything in this “jamb”...

      But Russia will have to correct this “charity” by officially withdrawing from the Agreement (denunciation), and re-recognizing the status of these water areas as disputed. And, in the event that Oslo begins any “movements” in the water area with the task of exploration and production of energy resources on the shelf and fishing, answer DE FACTO, SYMMETRICALLY...

      Those. INTENSIVELY, DE FACTO, begin our own exploration and production of energy resources from the shelf, once again recognized by Russia as disputed.
      And, “if necessary,” in case of obstacles from the Norwegian Navy and Coast Guard, do this under the cover of the Northern Fleet of the Russian Navy...

      Norway has joined the illegal so-called. "sanctions" of the EU and NATO against Russia?.. Joined...

      . Do these “sanctions” PREVIOUSLY concluded conditions and guarantees for the placement of Russian sovereign assets illegally and unilaterally violate?.. Violate...

      Well, that means Russia has every right to unilaterally abandon its approaches to the agreements previously concluded with Oslo. Including agreements on the division of the shelf economic zone in the Barents Sea...
    4. 0
      April 29 2024 22: 42
      By the way, a request was made by a deputy to the fisheries supervision. They clearly answered that it would be economically beneficial for US to keep this part for ourselves. But no one is responsible for gifts here...
  2. +12
    April 18 2024 05: 15
    Yes, we have many “patriots” at the helm. Nobody argues, they first make a bunch of mistakes, and then when they are out of business they begin to be indignant on all sorts of patriotic Twitter and other networks. At the same time, everyone around is to blame except themselves. And this seems to be a feature of local capitalism, and of course, squandering the country for beads and a jar of herring has not gone away either... Capitalist patriotism is when the soul is warmed not so much by love for the homeland, as by accounts in various banks, and the sound of gold in your pockets, and the opportunity to brag about it to your neighbors.....
  3. +5
    April 18 2024 06: 18
    about 100 thousand sq. km of the Barents shelf water area was transferred to Norway without sufficient objective reasons
    So the question is, what were the country’s leadership thinking about then and what principles guided them? Did they receive something in return from the Norwegians, or perhaps national security was strengthened? Of course, it is difficult for an ordinary citizen to understand such intricate diplomatic steps, but in the end it’s a shame for the state.
  4. +7
    April 18 2024 06: 41
    Nowadays it is fashionable to spit at the Corn Man. Although in the 80s, when I visited Kerch, Yalta, and Sevastopol, I did not notice any difference; it was all the Soviet Union.
    But there were so many justifiers. when they presented "Kemskuvolos" to a NATO country.
  5. 0
    April 18 2024 07: 08
    Historically, none other than Pavel Pestel, executed in the Decembrist case, proposed that Russia annex Norway as an Atlantic outpost. 40 years have passed and the Traitor Tsar sold Alaska, sealing up our last free exit from the Arctic Ocean.
  6. +6
    April 18 2024 07: 42
    I did not find in the article the name of the person who handed over to Norway
    extensive shelf area of ​​281 thousand square meters. km.

    The article has no value without indicating specific names.
  7. 0
    April 18 2024 08: 34
    Listen to Volodin less in the morning. Does he want Spitsbergen to become a militarized zone without us? And let’s see about the large reserves in Medvedev’s zone. This year, Norway, having chartered a Chinese semi-submersible platform (self-propelled), began exploration work east of Medvezhiy in search of oil and gas. Let's see what they find. Under the USSR, Sevneftegazpromrazvedka studied everything there and found nothing significant there.
  8. +7
    April 18 2024 10: 47
    And the point is not only that, according to many Russian experts, about 100 thousand square meters. km of the Barents shelf water area was transferred to Norway without sufficient objective reasons

    Who conveyed this, well who? :) Probably the communists or maybe this damned Yeltsin legacy?-) 2010? Hmmm... a land dealer with a NATO member state? Beautiful.
    Where were these experts interesting in 2010? They probably went to school.
  9. +2
    April 18 2024 13: 02
    Both noted - the caliph for the hour (LADAMCHIK), and the permanent guarantor standing behind him. And both of them have devices for speaking and explaining everything. The only cooler thing is Saltykov-Shchedrin’s Organ - what if it’s not?
  10. +6
    April 18 2024 13: 12
    I think that Medvedev was not alone in making the decision to transfer the Barents shelf area.
    And they were transferred to Norway without sufficient objective reasons, that is, a reason to think about our rulers.
  11. -3
    April 18 2024 13: 30
    I have always been interested in the question - why do you need two authors to write such an empty article? The authors wrote a lot of nonsense, but not a word about the territorial dispute that had lasted since 1957 between Norway and the USSR, then between Norway and Russia, which ended in 2010 with the adoption of the Federal Law on the ratification of the treaty between the Russian Federation and the Kingdom of Norway on the delimitation of maritime spaces and cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean.
    1. +2
      April 19 2024 17: 21
      Do people really care what the dispute was like for almost half a century? It’s another matter to be indignant at the “squandering” of territories by the country’s leadership, especially if it’s LADIES. Just think of a half-century dispute, which can only be resolved through agreement, since it is a legal stalemate, and a forceful solution is impossible, since Norway is a NATO member. The main thing to throw down minuses is if someone is so smart that they delved into the history of the issue laughing

      The authors are also great:
      According to the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD), seismic exploration in subsequent years showed the presence of at least 1,9 billion barrels of hydrocarbons (15% of them oil) in the area that were economically exploitable.

      It doesn’t matter that seismic exploration only reveals promising structures for oil and gas, and hydrocarbon reserves and, moreover, composition (oil or gas) can only be determined by a direct method - drilling.
      In general, the authors decided that the main thing was to crow, and then at least not dawn.
      1. +1
        April 19 2024 21: 59
        Alas, the site is rapidly debilitating, and the site owners are at the head of this process.
        1. 0
          April 19 2024 23: 02
          Well, I’ve been on the site for a long time, and I’ve always had complaints about the materials. But we must pay tribute, the editors have principles, they allow everyone to speak, even obvious laymen, and they can comment almost without restrictions. Sometimes you want to use obscenities, of course, but here the editors also have principles laughing
          In general, I mean that the editors will not please everyone. But earlier discussions were somehow livelier, more interesting, that’s a fact...
  12. +3
    April 18 2024 23: 59
    Mr. Medvedev quietly sold the territory of the Barents Sea, and put the money in his personal pocket and hid it in the West. There is no other way to explain Medvedev’s actions. It is necessary to denounce this agreement, and initiate a criminal case against Medvedev for theft on an especially large scale, betrayal of the interests of Russia.
  13. 0
    April 19 2024 13: 46
    Unoccupied area

    A section of the Barents Sea shelf that Russia transferred to Norway in 2010

    Another “Kemskaya volost”... What is this habit of throwing away lands, is it a desire to please, or do those in power do such actions because of material gain for themselves?
    They, who distribute the land, did not look at the movie, and they had no one to say: “What, you son of a bitch, an impostor, are you squandering state-owned lands?! You won’t be able to stock up on any volosts like that”!!!???
    Now Alaska, now a section of the Barents Sea, now Crimea, now Donbass, now Russian lands that now belong to Kazakhstan...
  14. 0
    April 19 2024 19: 57
    Well, everything is as usual! We were deceived! We did not know! We are white and fluffy! Patience, one word. How tired of this! When will “our people” think about the interests of the Motherland more than their own? An age-old question that has no answer.
  15. 0
    April 19 2024 23: 08
    Diee Maxime muß unbedingt lauten:

    Mit Feind-Staaten - oder solchen die sich bestechen lassen um es zu werden - macht man keine Geschäfte!!!

    ANY Verträge mit Norwegen, Finnland und Schweden müssen sofort auf den Prüfstand und sofort
    gekündigt werden, wenn sie Russland, oder russische Interesssen negativ beeinflussen; Ohne Ausnahme!!!

    Und ich frage vorsorglich; Was ist mit der Türkei...?!? Kein anderes Land verkauft dem Bandera-Nazi-Regime in Kiew so viele gefährliche Kampfdrohnen wie der Familien-Clan von Erdogan, Drohnen mit denen nicht nur russische Soldaten, sondern auch Zivile Ziele angegriffen und Frauen und Kinder getötet werden...!!!

    Man kann mit so einem Land nicht wirklich "befreundet", ja nicht einmal tolerant umgehen...!!!
  16. 0
    April 20 2024 23: 26
    The Kremlin, apparently, pocketed crowns and disposed of the national treasure. Will they flog themselves now? I doubt. The authorities haven’t changed, they’re still sitting, castling chairs.
  17. 0
    April 22 2024 18: 19
    written amorphously
    After a fight, they do not wave their fists.

    P and M themselves gave this piece of territory, to put it bluntly. The wealth of which was known from the very beginning, fortunately the 21st century is in the yard.
    recall "straightening"? And no one over the hill will agree. Forceful solution? - no one needs a new non-war with NATO directly, and at sea.

    Responsible for the transfer? they are untouchable, even in the article about them no, no... no...
    So it’s better not to remember. You can nod at the monitor (sad joke)