Culture of the Middle Ages. The most ancient books in Europe

115
Culture of the Middle Ages. The most ancient books in Europe
Barbarians fight the Romans. Illustration by Angus McBride


In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was God.

Gospel of John 1:1

Culture and people. We begin the story about the culture of the Middle Ages (about which we have somewhat forgotten) from 476 AD - the period when the Western Roman Empire disappeared into oblivion. This was a severe blow to ancient culture, which was replaced by the culture of barbarians who migrated to Europe. However, the influence of Rome was so strong that they, these same barbarians, became very Latinized, began to speak “barbarian Latin”, and already at the beginning of the XNUMXth century accepted the Christian faith. Barbarian kingdoms arose in the former territory of the empire.



But in general, the culture was greatly degraded, many technologies were forgotten, and people’s lives became very simple. But although the Roman Empire in the West perished, the papacy, individual monasteries, as well as books written earlier, survived. First of all, we will talk about books.

As a rule, the books of that time were mainly translations of the Bible and Gospels, and they served the purpose of spreading the faith of Christ among the new pagan flock. These manuscripts were called codices.

Today, scientists know of 322 manuscripts with the texts of the New Testament, written in uncial script* only in Greek and dating back to the XNUMXrd–XNUMXth centuries. ad. That is, the “Dark Ages” in Europe were not really that dark, if during this time people continued to write and rewrite books.


Fragment of the Gospel of Luke (12:54–13:4). The Codex Alexandrina is one of the oldest manuscripts containing the text of the Bible, written in Greek and dating back to the XNUMXth century AD. British Library, London

And also magnificent and expensive manuscripts, made of purple-painted parchment and with text written in gold and silver on biblical themes, were created from the 4th to the 6th centuries, for example, in Northern Italy. And not in one place, but in different workshops, that is, the complex and expensive technique of creating such books was by no means forgotten!

But it was at this time that there were wars there, and power changed at least four times. The Goths of Odoacer, the Byzantines, the Lombards - whoever encroached on these lands, with the capture of cities and widespread robberies. But despite all this, apparently, wealthy customers for such books continued to exist, as did the conditions for the creation of such masterpieces.

It was only after the creation of the kingdom of the Lombards that the production of “purple codices” for some reason immediately stopped, and we don’t know the answer why.

One of the 25 “purple codices” that have come down to us is an Old Latin version of the Gospel, made in Italy in the 419th century. It is currently preserved in Brescia (hence the name "Codex from Brescia") in the Civic Library of Ceriniana (on display in the Museum of Christian Art). The manuscript contains XNUMX leaves, colored in purple, covered with silver and gold ink, and decorated with arches at the bottom of the sheet.

It is interesting that, judging by the verses of the monk-scribe Godescalc (8th century, designer of the “Godescalc Gospel”), the manuscripts on purple parchment also had some symbolic meaning:

The purple backgrounds here are covered with gold;
With the scarlet blood of the thundering one, the kingdom is opened to heaven;
The starry palace promises us the joys of heaven;
The word of the Lord shines solemnly in a bright radiance.
God's covenants, dressed in scarlet roses,
We are made to participate in the sacrament of His blood.
In light gold sparks and delicate silver shine
The mysterious white virginity of heaven descends upon us...

(Translation by O. A. Dobiash-Rozhdestvenskaya).


One of the pages of the Silver Code. The purple color of the parchment has changed its color over time, but the text written in silver ink is still clearly visible today. Uppsala University Library, Sweden

The “Silver Codex”, containing the text of all four Gospels, which was prepared for the Ostrogoth king Theodoric the Great at the beginning of the 6th century, was also written on purple parchment, and it was written in Gothic. Most likely, its creator (or creators) were familiar with the “Code from Brescia”, because they tried to make their code no worse, and they succeeded.


Page 7 of the Rossano Codex. Purple has changed its color over time. The miniatures depict the parable of the Good Samaritan. Diocesan Museum of Sacred Art of Rossano

Also among the luxurious “purple codices” is the “Rossano Gospel” (“Rossan Codex”) of the 336th century: the thin parchment is painted purple, and the text is written in gold and silver ink. It originally contained 188 sheets, but only XNUMX of them have survived to this day.


"The Book of Durrow". The beginning of the Gospel of Mark. Trinity College Library, Dublin

One of the ancient manuscripts of evangelical content that has survived to this day is the Book of Durrow (650–700). Moreover, it is also considered one of the oldest illuminated manuscripts of medieval Europe.

It is not known exactly where it was created. Both the island of Iona and Lindisfarne Abbey are named. Moreover, its special value lies not in its text itself, but in 12 intertwined initials (the first letter in the text), which are so large that they occupy most of the page and represent completely unique examples of illustration from a time so distant from us.

There are also five miniatures depicting the four Evangelists and John the Baptist, the size of a full page, and another six so-called carpet pages, entirely of ornaments alone.


Image of a man in the Book of Durrow. Trinity College Library, Dublin

The “carpet” pages are covered with amazingly complex Celtic designs, executed with amazing skill. I just can’t believe how you can draw all this so neatly and clearly with just your hands and hair brushes. Both gold and silver inks are widely used, and this is the first time they have been used for illuminated text.

And it is also important because it contains the text that formed the Roman Catholic Church, and it used it for more than 1 years. And remains the basis of the Bible for today's Christian church.


"Carpet Page" "Books from Durrow". Trinity College Library, Dublin

The Amiatinian Codex or Codex Amiatinus (late 7th - early 8th century) is considered the oldest handwritten Bible in Latin. And it was created by the monks of Monquirmouth-Jarrow Abbey in the kingdom of Northumbria, after which it was sent as a gift to the Pope.

It’s funny that this book weighs like a good sack of cement: 30–35 kg and contains 1 sheets of parchment, of which 040 have reached us.

Created at the end of the 7th - beginning of the 8th century, this manuscript is kept today in the Laurentian Library in Florence. The illustrations in it are bright and colorful.

There is a preface written in gold ink on purple paper, a luxury reserved only for the most important texts intended for emperors and popes. There are Covenant diagrams based on the works of St. Jerome and St. Augustine.


Thumbnail on page 5, which opens the text of the “Old Testament” in the Codex Amytianus. Depicts Ezra** as a monk-scribe. Laurentian Library, Florence

The Lindisfarne Gospel (c. 700–715) was produced on the “holy island” of Lindisfarne within the walls of St. Cuthbert's monastery and contains the four canonical Gospels of the New Testament. Written in Latin. And it also has carpet pages with Celtic crosses framed by fantastical birds, bird and animal designs, and bright half-page initials outlined in red dots.

Inscriptions in small print are visible between the lines on the pages. This is a translation of the Gospels in Old English, made in the 10th century by Bishop Aldred of Lindisfarne. This, by the way, is one of the first translations of the Gospels into English. The Lindisfarne Gospel is now kept in the British Library in London.


"Rug Page" from the Lindisfarne Gospel, preceding the text of the Gospel of Matthew. British Library, London

Next in time comes the Book of Kells.

The following is known about it: when the Vikings attacked the monastery of St. Cuthbert in 793, this book somehow miraculously survived, and it was transported “out of harm’s way” to Durham, in the northeast of England. That is, in 793 it was already written.

It is the Book of Kells that can be considered the most illuminated manuscript of the early Middle Ages. It was made by the efforts of many monks from the monastery of St. Columba on the island of Iona, but then, due to the constant threat from the Vikings, they transported it to the Monastery of Kells in Ireland.


A page from the Book of Kells with an image of Chi-Rho - a monogram of the name of Christ, consisting of the two initial Greek letters of his name - Χ (chi) and Ρ (rho), crossed together. Trinity College Library, Dublin

The book is exceptionally richly illuminated, that is, decorated with colorful ornaments and colored miniatures.

And here’s what’s interesting and still defies explanation: on the pages of this manuscript there are decorative elements that can only be seen with a magnifying glass with tenfold magnification. In particular, such ornamental elements can be seen on initial letters and in some illustrations. But at that time lenses with such magnification did not yet exist.

So how did all this come to be drawn?

If we ignore the aliens, the descendants of the Atlanteans and the “antediluvian civilization” that created a unique, although not preserved, technique, there is only one acceptable explanation: the artist who designed it was... shortsighted. So he worked in this microscopic technique, because he simply could not work in another!


"Book of Kells". Page 292. The beginning of the Gospel of John. Trinity College Library, Dublin

One can imagine what an impression the pages of this book made on the believers of that time, who were not spoiled by the bright and colorful images around them, when they had the opportunity to look at it. For them it was a real miracle, so it is not at all surprising that they believed in their holiness and the divine inspiration of the monks who created it.


Page with the text of the Book of Kells. Trinity College Library, Dublin

By the way, the adventures of the Book of Kells are reflected even in... modern animation!

In 2009, director Tomm Moore shot the full-length color cartoon “The Mystery of Kelle”, the plot of which centers on story rescue and completion of the Book of Kells at the beginning of the 9th century.

* Uncial – consisting entirely of capital letters. Commonly used in the 4th–8th centuries AD by Latin and Greek book scribes.

** Ezra - a biblical character from the Aaronic family, a pious and learned priest who lived in Babylon under King Artaxerxes. In the seventh year of his reign, he received permission to go to Jerusalem and take with him all the Jews who wanted to return to their homeland, as well as priests, Levites, singers, etc. 1 people went to accompany Ezra to Judea.
115 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    April 6 2024 04: 39
    “IN THE BEGINNING THERE WAS A WORD, IN THE END IT WILL, OF COURSE, NO LONGER BE. Of course, there are other interpretations of this complex subject, of which only one will suit us:
    IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD, AND IT WAS ENDLESS..."
    Yuri Koval "Suer Vier"
    1. +12
      April 6 2024 05: 03
      First there was the Word, but the words ran out,
      Sailors have already inhabited the Earth, -
      And they rushed along the gangplank up to the islands,
      For beauty's sake, calling them ships.

      Will science forgive us for this parallel,
      For freedom in interpreting theories, -
      And if at first there was a word on Earth,
      This is, of course, the word “sea”!
    2. +5
      April 6 2024 05: 06
      IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD, AND IT WAS ENDLESS
      It is with politicians and philosophers that it is endless, but with the Lord: “in the beginning was the Word and the Word was the Deed.” I don’t remember it verbatim, but something like that. The author has not yet mentioned the works of St. Augustine of the early 5th century and various barbaric “Truths” of about the same time
      1. +7
        April 6 2024 06: 05
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        various barbaric "Truths" of about the same time

        "Truths" were not books! You can’t put plum jam in a salad with seaweed.
        1. ANB
          +4
          April 6 2024 20: 40
          . You can’t put plum jam in a salad with seaweed.

          Why?
          The question has nothing to do with the phrase about truth and books.
          Purely a culinary question.
          Seaweed is not mixed with anything. Why can’t it be made with plum jam?
          :)
          1. +4
            April 6 2024 21: 44
            Quote: ANB
            Why can’t it be made with plum jam?

            Can. But it's not tasty! And “Pravda” is a DOCUMENT. There will be more about the documents, including the “truths” (there are several of them). Or do you prefer a simple list of all books known today?
            1. ANB
              +2
              April 6 2024 23: 15
              . Can. But it's not tasty!

              In fact, they even make jam from seaweed. So I'll look for a recipe or invent it myself. Can Tkemali be considered plum jam?

              Vyacheslav Olegovich, I specifically added that the question is culinary, not historical. :)
              I read comments on history. There are no less interesting things in them than in the article.
              1. +2
                April 7 2024 06: 06
                Quote: ANB
                There are no less interesting things in them than in the article.

                Without any doubt. I READ ALL of them too. But... I personally get 1-2 benefits. No more.
            2. ANB
              0
              April 9 2024 02: 16
              https://www.russianfood.com/recipes/recipe.php?rid=21055
              I found the recipe. This is plum and seaweed marmalade.
              I wrote that seaweed is a universal product. :)
      2. +3
        April 6 2024 06: 06
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        The author has not yet mentioned the works of St. Augustine of the early 5th century

        Chronological framework of the theme of the cycle 476-1500. Therefore, all codes are “before that”! are mentioned in the “mass”, but are not personally identified.
        1. +3
          April 6 2024 06: 48
          Chronological framework of the theme of the cycle 476-1500. Therefore, all codes are “before that”! are mentioned in the “mass”, but are not personally identified.
          Augustine lived at this time and even earlier. In addition, the figure is very noticeable and deserves a personal mention
          "Truths" were not books!
          What do you think it was? Notes on a piece of dirty paper?
          1. +3
            April 6 2024 08: 44
            Quote: Dutchman Michel
            Notes on a piece of dirty paper?

            That's it!
            1. +5
              April 6 2024 08: 56
              The oldest text of the monument, written in Vulgar Latin, was created at the beginning of the 65th century under King Clovis I and consisted of XNUMX chapters (“titles”). But we are talking about literature. And this is a DOCUMENT. There is a difference. You can’t lump everything in one material into one pile.
              1. +2
                April 6 2024 14: 45
                But we're talking about literature
                Before the Renaissance there was no literature. There were "documents" as you call them, and the Bible, but they were not literature. What then is literature?
                1. +3
                  April 6 2024 15: 04
                  Quote: Dutchman Michel
                  Before the Renaissance there was no literature.

                  Imagine it was. Open the text Medieval literature on the Internet and read it.
        2. +5
          April 6 2024 08: 26
          Quote: kalibr
          not personally identifiable

          But what about Jordan with its Getika? He also deserves a personal mention...
          1. +3
            April 6 2024 09: 00
            Quote: Luminman
            But what about the Jordan with its Getica?

            Why are you all reading so inattentively? We are talking about the territory of the Western Roman Empire. Jordan is the Eastern Roman Empire. More on this later...
            1. +3
              April 6 2024 09: 05
              Quote: kalibr
              Why are you all reading so inattentively? We are talking about the territory of the Western Roman Empire. Jordan is the Eastern Roman Empire

              But what about this? Please note that the text is written in Greek. As far as I know, no one wrote in Greek in the western part of the Empire...

              Fragment of the Gospel of Luke (12:54–13:4). The Codex Alexandrina is one of the oldest manuscripts containing the text of the Bible, written in Greek and dating back to the XNUMXth century AD. British Library, London
              1. +3
                April 6 2024 09: 16
                We are talking about biblical texts. And you propose to insert Jordan here?
                1. +3
                  April 6 2024 09: 19
                  Quote: kalibr
                  We are talking about biblical texts. And you propose to insert Jordan here?

                  Article title - Culture of the Middle Ages. The most ancient books in Europe. Do you only classify Testaments as books?
                  1. +1
                    April 6 2024 09: 32
                    Quote: Luminman
                    Do you only classify Testaments as books?

                    For now - yes. Then we will talk separately about the literature of Byzantium. Separately - legislative acts, chronicles, armorials, songbooks,... a lot of things. Naturally, something will be missed. There are many hundreds and thousands of books...
        3. +1
          April 6 2024 09: 06
          Chronological framework of the theme of the cycle 476-1500. Therefore, all codes are “before that”!

          The question is: does the origin of all these codes really fit into this chronological framework... Or is their creation actually in the 16th - 17th centuries? Just like many supposed lists of ancient literature that have come down to us...

          The same Silver Code - apparently has nothing to do with either Wulfila, or the Goths, or Theodoric...
          1. +2
            April 6 2024 09: 16
            Quote: paul3390
            as it appears

            Judging by what?
            1. +2
              April 6 2024 09: 20
              1. Manufacturing technology.
              2. Circumstances of the find.
              3. The language of the codex - it is extremely doubtful that it is Gothic.
              4. The essence of the code - Ulfila was actually an Arian. And there - no traces.
              5. Theodoric was also an Arian. Why did he order the Catholic Code?
              1. +2
                April 6 2024 09: 27
                Quote: paul3390
                Why did he order the Catholic Code?

                Out of curiosity!
                1. +2
                  April 6 2024 09: 31
                  Yeah... Can you imagine how much such a book cost at that time? In addition, Theodoric, like the rest of the German kings, pursued a policy of clear separation of subjects. Yes - we have one state, but we are Germanic-Arians, and you are Roman-Catholics. And there is no need to mix anything here. So it’s not very clear why he needs an expensive Catholic Code.
                  1. +1
                    April 6 2024 09: 34
                    Quote: paul3390
                    So it’s not very clear why he needs an expensive Catholic Code.

                    I'll have to look at everything there is according to the Silver Code...
                    1. +1
                      April 6 2024 09: 49
                      Well, then for starters... wink I can add more... drinks

                      https://new.chronologia.org/volume6/argenteus.html
                      1. +4
                        April 6 2024 09: 51
                        I won’t even read this! To argue with this brethren is to disrespect yourself.
                      2. +1
                        April 6 2024 09: 59
                        Your will. However - the facts are clear - the Silver Code raises a lot of doubts on all counts. Which ones don't take. And just because you don’t like certain authors, the essence doesn’t change, the questions remain.

                        If you don’t want this, I can look in my bookmarks for articles on the analysis of the supposedly Gothic language of the codex. About the impossibility of its manufacture purely technically. About what kind of writing Ulfilas invented and what he translated. Was he really a German Goth? About the theological aspects of the test. About the dubious circumstances of his discovery. And so on and so forth..

                        It’s just that in opuses like the ones I cited above, people put it all together and present it in simple language. What they want to prove with this is a completely different matter. It is not necessary to share their further delusional conclusions from all this.
                      3. +3
                        April 6 2024 10: 47
                        Quote: paul3390
                        It’s just that in opuses like the ones I cited above, people put it all together and present it in simple language. What they want to prove with this is a completely different matter. It is not necessary to share their further delusional conclusions from all this.

                        Other simplicity is worse than theft!
                      4. +1
                        April 6 2024 10: 55
                        Maybe.

                        Well, would you like to read, for example, about the activities of, say, Poggio Bracciolini? To whom we supposedly owe the lists of Vegetius, Marcus Manilius, Ammianus Marcellinus, Vitruvius, Petronius, Quintilian, “Silva” Statius and others. Like the complete manuscript of Lucretius “On the Nature of Things”...

                        Which were unknown before him. And what Poggio is - at the same time, he was a very educated person, had a very bright style and left a bunch of works of different genres ..

                        By the way, we owe the first copies of Tacitus to him..

                        And there are a lot of such examples. Bracciolini was by no means the only one.
                      5. +4
                        April 6 2024 15: 11
                        Quote: paul3390
                        To whom we supposedly owe the lists of Vegetius, Marcus Manilius, Ammianus Marcellinus, Vitruvius, Petronius, Quintilian, “Silva” Statius and others. Like the complete manuscript of Lucretius “On the Nature of Things”...

                        He probably didn’t even have time to go to the toilet, coming up with so many volumes. And he had a computer in his head... This is work for decades for dozens of scribes. It's like the chatter about Carter tampering with Tutankhamun's tomb. Why did he spend 5 years extracting the finds himself? And then I didn’t show 80%... They are still being studied. The point of a fake is to sell and quickly recoup costs. Otherwise it is not needed at all.
                      6. +2
                        April 6 2024 15: 29
                        Firstly, there was a whole circle of them there who were lovers of ancient antiquity, and the people were not poor.. Secondly, why do you measure all actions solely by money? History is full of examples of completely disinterested fraud, for various reasons... And in the early Renaissance there were simply dozens, if not hundreds, of such examples. Including those that were later admitted by the authors themselves. They were kind of curious whether it would work or not? The Poems of Ossian alone, published by Macpherson, were worth something...

                        Before the first printing press was operational in Italy in 1465, a few years later the history of literature registered the forgery of Latin authors.

                        In 1498, Annius de Viterbe published in Rome a collection of works by SEMPRONIUS, CATON and many others, which he allegedly found in Mantua, but in fact he himself composed.

                        In 1519, the French scientist de Boulogne forged two books by V. FLACC, and one of the remarkable humanist scientists, Sigonius, published in 1583 previously unknown passages from CICERO. This simulation was made with such skill that it was discovered only two centuries later, and even then by accident: a letter from Sigonius was found in which he confessed to the falsification.

                        In the same century, one of the first German humanists to introduce Germany to the Roman classics, Prolucius wrote the seventh book of OVID's Calendar Mythology. This hoax was partly caused by a scientific dispute about how many books this work of Ovid was divided into; Despite indications on behalf of the author that he had six books, some Renaissance scholars, based on compositional features, insisted that there should be twelve books.

                        The Dutchman Merula, the author of the "World History", repeatedly quoted long paragraphs from the manuscript of PISON and from the grammar of the times of Trajan, which never existed.

                        Franciscan Guevara published a philosophical novel he “found” in Florence, the hero of which is MARK AURELIUS. The historical novel was a success, but analysis revealed a hoax.

                        At the end of the 16th century, the issue of the spread of Christianity in Spain was poorly addressed. To fill the annoying gap, the Spanish monk Higuera, after much and difficult work, wrote a chronicle on behalf of the never-existing Roman historian FLAVIUS DEXTER.

                        In the 18th century, the Dutch scholar Hirkens published a tragedy under the name of LUCIUS VARA, supposedly a tragic poet of the Augustan era. Quite by accident, it was possible to establish that the Venetian Corrario published it in the 16th century on his own behalf, without trying to mislead anyone.

                        In 1800, the Spaniard Marchena amused himself by writing pornographic arguments in Latin. From them he fabricated a whole story and connected it with the text of Chapter XXII of Petroniev’s Satyricon. It is impossible to distinguish where Petronius ends and Marchena begins. He published his excerpt with Petronian text, indicating in the preface the imaginary location of the find.

                        This is not the only forgery of PETRONIUS's satyrs. A century before Marchen, the French officer Nodo published the “complete” Satyricon, supposedly “based on a thousand-year-old manuscript he bought from a Greek during the siege of Belgrade,” but no one had seen either this or the more ancient manuscripts of Petronius.

                        Also republished was CATULlus, forged in the 18th century by the Venetian poet Corradino, who allegedly found Catullus's list in Rome.

                        A 19th-century German student, Wagenfeld, allegedly translated from Greek into German the history of Phenicia, written by the Phoenician historian SANCHONIATHON and translated into Greek by PHILO of Byblos. The find made a huge impression, one of the professors gave a preface to the book, after which it was published, and when Wagenfeld was asked for the Greek manuscript, he refused to submit it.

                        In 1498, Eusebius Zilber published in Rome on behalf of BEROZUS, “a Babylonian priest who lived 250 years before Christ,” but “wrote in Greek,” an essay in Latin, “Five Books of Antiquities with Commentaries by John Anni.” The book went through several editions, and then turned out to be a forgery of the Dominican monk Giovanni Nanni from Viterboro. However, despite this, the legend of the existence of Berosus did not disappear, and in 1825 Richter in Leipzig published the book “The Extant Chaldean Stories of Berosus,” allegedly compiled from “mentions” about Berosus in the works of other authors (see [4] , pp. 659–660). It is surprising that, for example, academician. Turaev has no doubts about the existence of Beroz and believes that his work is “highly valuable for us” ([32], vol. 1, p. 20).

                        In the twenties of our century, “the German Schenis sold several fragments from classical texts to the Leipzig library. Among the others was a piece of paper from the works of PLAUTOUS, written in purple ink. The curators of the manuscript cabinet of the Berlin Academy of Sciences, completely confident in the authenticity of their purchase, praised it: “The beautiful handwriting bears all the features characteristic of a very long period. It is clear that this is a fragment of a luxurious book; the use of purple ink suggests that the book was in the library of a wealthy Roman, perhaps in the imperial library. We are confident that our fragment is part of a book created in Rome itself” ([55], p. 58). However, two years later there followed a scandalous revelation of all the manuscripts presented by Sheinis.
                      7. +1
                        April 6 2024 16: 46
                        Quote: paul3390
                        just dozens, if not hundreds.

                        Amazing! Write about it. You will have a great article. Why waste time on comments when you can make wonderful material out of them!!!
                      8. +3
                        April 6 2024 15: 45
                        in the 1665th century Muret, who sent Scaliger his own poems under the name of the forgotten Latin poets ATTIUS and TROBEUS. Even the historian J. Balzac created a fictional Latin poet. He included in an edition of Latin poems published in XNUMX one in praise of Nero, allegedly found by him on half-decayed parchment and attributed to an unknown contemporary of Nero. This poem was even included in anthologies of Latin poets until the forgery was discovered.

                        In 1729, Montesquieu published a French translation of a Greek poem in the spirit of Sappho, saying in the preface that these seven songs were written by an unknown poet who lived after Sappho, and he found them in the library of a Greek bishop. Montesquieu later admitted to the hoax.

                        In 1826, the Italian poet Leopardi forged two Greek odes in the style of Anacreon, allegedly written by hitherto unknown poets. He also published his second forgery - a translation of a Latin retelling of a Greek chronicle dedicated to the history of the church fathers and the description of Mount Sinai.

                        A famous forgery of ancient classics is the hoax of Pierre Louis, who invented the poetess BILITIS. He published her songs in Mercure de France, and in 1894 he published them as a separate edition. In the preface, Louis outlined the circumstances of his “discovery” of songs by an unknown Greek poetess of the 1908th century BC. and reported that a certain Dr. Heim even found her grave. Two German scientists - Ernst and Willamowitz-Müllendorff - immediately dedicated articles to the newly discovered poetess, and her name was included in the Dictionary of Writers by Laulier and Gidel. In the next edition of the Songs, Louis placed her portrait, for which the sculptor Laurent copied one of the terracottas of the Louvre. The success was enormous. Back in XNUMX, not everyone knew about the hoax, since that year he received a letter from an Athenian professor asking him to indicate where the originals of Bilitis' songs were kept.



                        What’s interesting is that there were a lot of fakes BEFORE the printing of books and the revival of interest in antiquities..

                        In the 9th century, Isidore of Seville presented almost a hundred epistles and decrees written by him on behalf of the "more ancient" Roman bishops, ranging from the "contemporaries to the apostles", together with several letters from supposed correspondents of imaginary popes and with the acts of hitherto unknown councils.

                        These famous decretals “... were accepted without any doubt... In the next century, the Abbot of Prum Repine made reference to them, and compilers of similar works continued to use them until the 7th century, when Gratian based them on his book “Decretum” , this extensive body of medieval ecclesiastical law, and what is built on this basis remains to this day” ([420], p. XNUMX).

                        “The falsity of these documents was easily proven by gross anachronisms and mistakes... The time of compilation of this book must be considered between the VI Paris Cathedral, which took place in 829, since the forger borrowed a lot from this cathedral, and the Quiersian Cathedral, which took place in 857, where these the decretals, they say, have already been cited as authoritative documents by Charles the Bald... now they generally think that they were written in Metz, and Ginkmar even says that this collection was brought from Spain by Riculf, who occupied the See of Metz from 787 to 814.” ([7], p. 418).


                        I’m not talking about countless church opuses, such as forged Logias, Scriptures, works of early theologians like Celsus, and other documents...
                      9. +2
                        April 6 2024 16: 50
                        Quote: paul3390
                        I'm already silent

                        No need to remain silent! Write an article. For example, I never paid attention to this aspect. It wasn’t interesting... And you, as I see, know a lot of things. Write... if you don’t want to write through your profile, I will provide you with mine. I will help with editing and submission for moderation. The entire fee will be yours...
                      10. +1
                        April 6 2024 16: 55
                        I wrote to you in a personal message...read it, please.
              2. +5
                April 6 2024 11: 35
                Quote: paul3390
                1. Manufacturing technology.
                2. Circumstances of the find

                Any artifact can fall under the points you specified, from the Sumerians to Lenin’s will...

                Quote: paul3390
                3. The language of the codex - it is extremely doubtful that it is Gothic

                Nobody knows what the Gothic language was. Sound recording equipment did not exist then, and only a few owned runes...

                Quote: paul3390
                4. The essence of the code - Ulfila was actually an Arian. And there - no traces

                This is merely a translation of the Scriptures from Greek into Gothic. This is what he is famous for...

                Quote: paul3390
                5. Theodoric was also an Arian. Why did he order the Catholic Code?

                This is an ordinary translation of Scripture without any connection to Christian movements. Commentaries on Scripture appeared later and are still appearing...
                1. +4
                  April 6 2024 11: 56
                  Quote: Luminman
                  Luminman
                  (luminman)

                  + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
                2. +2
                  April 6 2024 11: 59
                  1. Well - if Lenin’s will is written, say, with fullerene ink of the 21st century...
                  2. If no one knows, then why do they think that this is Gothic?? But there are a lot of Celtic roots with Germanic endings. Where could the Germanic Goths in the Black Sea region have picked this up, especially in this form?
                  3. Not really. If you are not lazy, read the literature on the difference between the Arian canon of Scripture and the Catholic one.
                  4. See point 3.
                  1. +3
                    April 6 2024 15: 10
                    Quote: paul3390
                    If you are not lazy, read the literature on the difference between the Arian canon of Scripture and the Catholic one

                    There is no difference. I'll bring you similar example from a later time. Martin Luther translated the Bible into a living and understandable vernacular German language. But that's not what he's famous for. And he is famous for the fact that he wrote comments on it and these comments led to the birth of a new religion - Protestantism...
                    1. +1
                      April 6 2024 15: 21
                      I won’t even argue - because in theology, especially early Christian theology, my knowledge is rather superficial. I'm just passing on what I read.
                    2. +1
                      April 6 2024 16: 57
                      Quote: Luminman
                      Martin Luther

                      By the way, I was at Luther's grave...
                      1. +1
                        April 6 2024 19: 40
                        Quote: kalibr
                        By the way, I was at Luther's grave...

                        His associate, Melanchthon, who contributed to the Reformation no less than Luther himself, is also buried nearby. I was in Leipzig, but laziness I wasn’t allowed to get to those places...
                      2. +1
                        April 6 2024 19: 56
                        Quote: Luminman
                        Melanchthon, who contributed no less to the Reformation than Luther himself.

                        This is how useful it is to communicate in VO. I've never even heard of such a person...
                  2. +2
                    April 6 2024 21: 09
                    Well - if Lenin's will is written, say, with fullerene ink of the 21st century...
                    Pavel, Anne Frank’s diary was written with a ballpoint pen, but nothing.
    3. +10
      April 6 2024 07: 10
      1. In the beginning there was a word, and the word was two bytes, but there was nothing else.
      2. And God separated one from zero, and saw that it was good.
      3. And God said: Let there be data, and it was so.
      4. And God said: let every data be collected in its place, and created floppy disks, and hard drives, and CDs.
      5. And God said: let there be computers, so that there will be somewhere to shove floppy disks, and hard drives, and compacts, and he created computers, and called them hard, and separated the hard from the software.
      ...
      https://anekdot.livejournal.com/2592502.html
      1. +3
        April 6 2024 11: 29
        . 2. And God separated one from zero, and saw that it was good.

        I can't resist, I agree hi )))
        Fluctuations are the basis of all changes.
      2. +3
        April 6 2024 16: 09
        In the beginning there was nothing, only complete symmetry, and free calibration
        flew over the waters.
        Then God separated the whole spin from the half-whole, and commanded the whole spin
        obey Bose statistics, and half-integer Fermi statistics. And he saw that
        it's good.

        And God separated gravity and placed its interaction constant lower than others
        constants, and ordered her to grovel at the micro level, but said that
        will exalt her above everyone, and she will command cosmology, for everything will be
        obey her. And gravity at the micro level crawled back to its place, and to this day
        resides there.

        And God separated the strong interaction from the electroweak interaction, and quarks from
        leptons, and ordered quarks to interact strongly and electroweakly, and
        leptons are only electroweakly. And he saw that it was good.
        And God broke the symmetry of the electroweak interaction to weak and
        electromagnetic, and the vector bosons acquired mass, but the photon did not. AND
        vector bosons became similar to fermions, and became proud, but they did not have
        law of conservation of the number of particles, because they were bosons, and therefore it became weak
        short-range interaction.
        And there was evening and there was morning: the era of the electroweak phase transition.
        Gluons had color, and were similar to quarks, and interacted
        between themselves strongly, and generated other gluons. And God saw that it was strong
        the interaction is asymptotically free, but at large distances it is linear,
        aki in the string model.
        And God commanded the quarks to gather in threes, and one and the antiode, and with
        gluons into other combinations, singlet in color, and closed them there
        confinement. And God called quarks three baryons, and one
        antiode mesons, and he saw that this was good.
        And there was evening and there was morning: the era of confinement.
        Mesons consisted of a quark and an antiquark, and did not have a baryon number, and
        decayed before radiation, but the baryons did not contain antiquarks, and
        decayed only to nucleons, and could not go further. And there were more baryons
        than antibaryons, and therefore there remained nucleons that did not annihilate.
        And the nucleons were combined due to a complex exchange interaction, derived
        from the strong one, and joined together in twos, threes, and fours. Four at a time
        alpha particles, it was best for them to combine.
        And God saw that a quarter of all nucleons combined into alpha particles
        mass, the rest remained free, and the remaining elements in trace
        quantities. And therefore there was enough fuel in the interstellar gas for nuclear
        reactions and lighting of stars. And he saw that it was good.
        And there was evening and there was morning: the era of primary nucleosynthesis.
        1. 0
          April 6 2024 16: 42
          . In the beginning there was nothing, only complete symmetry, and free calibration
          flew over the waters.

          Beautiful... Especially flying over the waters of free calibration good )))
        2. +1
          April 6 2024 16: 58
          Quote: bk0010
          And there was evening and there was morning: the era of primary nucleosynthesis.

          I'm amazed by the depth of your knowledge! You need to understand this and write this!!!
          1. +2
            April 6 2024 18: 15
            Quote: kalibr
            You need to understand this and write this!!!
            This is not mine, I don’t remember where I read it.
      3. ANB
        +3
        April 6 2024 22: 13
        . 1. In the beginning there was a word, and the word was two bytes, but there was nothing else.

        Fake!
        On ibm360 a word was 4 bytes, and 16-bit ibm pcs appeared later.
        This proves that this text was not composed in ancient times, but around the late 80s of the 20th century.
        :)
  2. +10
    April 6 2024 06: 01
    This is how history was rewritten. And now they are rewriting it to suit everyone’s interests.
    You can't rewrite physics or chemistry. An old joke on this topic:
    Gennady was a humanitarian and somehow climbed into the electrical panel.
    Therefore, there is not, but there was.
  3. +7
    April 6 2024 06: 27
    . from 476 AD - the period when the Western Roman Empire disappeared into oblivion

    .in general the culture was greatly degraded, there were many technologies have been forgotten, and people's lives became very simple. But although the Roman Empire in the West died, the papacy, individual monasteries, as well as books survived

    What about the Eastern Roman Empire? The same Byzantium with its capital Constantinople. After all, it was a continuation of the Roman Empire in its eastern provinces during the period of late antiquity, until almost the end of the Middle Ages. That is, ancient Roman technologies should not have been forgotten.
    I am sure that acquired human experience, culture, knowledge do not disappear anywhere and do not disappear without a trace. They, like energy, flow from one society to another, transform and enrich themselves along the way.
    1. +7
      April 6 2024 06: 57
      There are many stories associated with Ancient Rome, many books have been written, and a large number of films have been shot. Life there was in full swing. The same cannot be said about Byzantium. Byzantium is like a blank spot in our history. Has nothing really happened there in a thousand years? A question to the author and a wish to expand on this topic.
      1. +3
        April 6 2024 08: 46
        Quote: Stas157
        A question to the author and a wish to expand on this topic.

        As part of the consideration of THIS TOPIC, this will be discussed. And no more!
    2. +4
      April 6 2024 07: 25
      Quote: Stas157
      What about the Eastern Roman Empire? The same Byzantium with its capital Constantinople.

      This probably refers to the Western Empire, which was turned into cultural ruins by the barbarians...
      1. +4
        April 6 2024 08: 07
        Quote: Luminman
        This probably refers to the Western Empire, which was turned into cultural ruins by the barbarians...

        This is true. The article was about the Western Roman Empire. But after it there remained the Eastern Roman Empire, which was probably the custodian and continuer of ancient Latin traditions. I'm just guessing about this. But I would like clarity on this (and examples) from professional historians.
        1. +2
          April 6 2024 08: 36
          Quote: Stas157
          But after it there remained the Eastern Roman Empire, which was probably the custodian and continuer of ancient Latin traditions

          In my opinion, Byzantium spent its entire history fighting off barbarians and had no time for continuing and preserving Roman traditions. Although, of course, compared to the barbarians, it was a highly cultural state...
        2. +4
          April 6 2024 08: 51
          Quote: Stas157
          This is true. The article was about the Western Roman Empire.

          Thank God at least someone noticed...
        3. +5
          April 6 2024 09: 47
          But after it remained the Eastern Roman Empire

          Actually, this is an artificial structure from the Renaissance. The contemporaries themselves clearly knew that the Roman Empire was alive and thriving, and the Roman emperor was still sitting on the throne in Constantinople. They did not even suspect any type of fall of the Western Roman Empire.. For everything, the imperial edict was still extremely desirable.

          But when Charlemagne was officially crowned Emperor of the West, the dance with the tambourine ended. What caused a flurry of indignation in Constantinople - there can only be one emperor!! Yes - he can appoint a co-ruler, but not so brazenly without asking anyone to appoint him! But by that time the barbarians had completely lost their understanding of political decency...

          However, there was also an interesting moment. Empress Irina, sitting on the throne in Constantinople, is rumored to have invited Charles to marry her. After the breakdown of her son's marriage to Karl's daughter. Yes, he himself didn’t seem to mind - but they didn’t have time. Irina was overthrown.
    3. +2
      April 6 2024 08: 45
      Quote: Stas157
      What about the Eastern Roman Empire?

      Flies separately. Cutlets separately. Are you also proposing to lump everything into a heap?
    4. +3
      April 6 2024 11: 32
      . I am sure that acquired human experience, culture, knowledge do not disappear anywhere and do not disappear without a trace. They, like energy, flow from one society to another, transform and enrich themselves along the way.

      Hmm... Stas, yes, you are an optimist.
    5. +3
      April 6 2024 16: 19
      Quote: Stas157
      That is, ancient Roman technologies should not have been forgotten.
      You underestimate the depth of what happened. No one wanted to become an emperor, because there were no advantages, and they could be killed at any moment. Residents fled from the Roman Empire to the barbarians, because the exactions and constant civil wars got to everyone incredibly. The knowledge was not transferred as unnecessary (a village of 20 households does not need aqueducts, and the tribal militia does not care about the tactics of the legions - there is not enough numbers or armor, and there are no tasks requiring legions - there are too few people in the tribe). The inhabitants of Rome in the Middle Ages did not know that there was a great city where they lived. When they dug up ancient Rome, they went crazy. Everything was forgotten. Yes, somewhere far in the east there were remnants of its former greatness, but it was as difficult to get to them as it is now to reach the Moon.
      1. +5
        April 6 2024 17: 06
        . The inhabitants of Rome in the Middle Ages did not know that there was a great city where they lived.

        Reminded.
        The other day in some comment there was a photo.
        Library. Cinema. School. Factory. Everything is a beautiful Stalinist building. Ruins with fallen bricks, empty openings of windows and doors, everything is wrapped in plush, desolation. Abkhazia. In a hundred years, only the foundations will remain. No one will remember how it was, what life was like, what the culture was like. They don't remember anymore. Only in my memory do memories glimmer. I didn't think I'd make it.
      2. +1
        April 7 2024 19: 47
        Quote: bk0010
        The inhabitants of Rome in the Middle Ages did not know that there was a great city where they lived.
        And does this happen? They probably didn't read the books. Historical. But they didn’t yet have the Internet to enjoy the stories on History posted on VO wink
        Quote: bk0010
        When they dug up ancient Rome, they went crazy.
        Excuse me, who exactly went crazy and why? What was it and when was it dug up so that you could go crazy?
        1. 0
          April 7 2024 22: 19
          Quote: Seal
          Excuse me, who exactly went crazy and why?
          The Romans went nuts. From the fact that it turned out that they lived above the ancient city.
          Quote: Seal
          What was it and when was it dug up so that you could go crazy?
          Ruins of an ancient city.
          1. +1
            April 8 2024 07: 31
            Quote: bk0010
            The Romans went nuts. From the fact that it turned out that they lived above the ancient city.
            Is this statement of yours at least supported by anything? Well, maybe there is an article in some Roman or Italian newspaper like “Sensation!!! It turns out that the city of Rome stands on the ruins of an ancient city!!!
            Well, or at least a private letter from some Roman to someone on the other side of Italy or even abroad with the text: “Can you imagine, my friend Henry (Pedro, Protokakis ... another name), recently there were excavations on our street in Rome and dug up SOOOOO!!!, you better sit down....".
            Quote: bk0010
            Ruins of an ancient city.
            And, excuse me, the “ruins” were buried? By whom? And what exactly, in your opinion, was buried? The Colosseum, for example, right? Was he buried? Can you list what exactly you dug up?
            1. 0
              April 8 2024 21: 49
              Quote: Seal
              Is this statement of yours at least supported by anything?
              Tour guide.
              Quote: Seal
              And, excuse me, the “ruins” were buried?
              Mostly.
              Quote: Seal
              And what exactly, in your opinion, was buried?
              Come to Rome, they will show you a specially left archaeological site. There's a portico and statues. I don’t remember the exact one, something like area sacra di largo argentina, google it if you’re interested. The metro station near the center cannot be completed due to excavations.
              Quote: Seal
              The Colosseum, for example, right? Was he buried?
              No, it was not buried, so it was seriously damaged by those who dragged stones from it.
              1. 0
                April 8 2024 21: 56
                Here is a shot from my filming. And this is to pass the limit on the length of the text.
  4. +3
    April 6 2024 07: 20
    However, the influence of Rome was so strong that they, these same barbarians, became very Latinized, began to speak “barbarian Latin”, and already at the beginning of the 6th century accepted the Christian faith.

    Controversially Vyacheslav Olegovich. This is not even the average temperature in the hospital.
    For example, the Goths for the most part adopted Christianity back in the 4th century, the Franks at the end of the 5th century, and the Young Europeans, such as the Poles and Hungarians, in the 10th century. The latter are even later than us! By the way, among outsiders from Christian Europe there are probably Finns, Lithuanians, Latvians and Estonians.
    The most curious thing is that the incentive for the adoption of Christianity as a state religion in 90% was not its effectiveness, but under pressure or circumstances (in the form of Bavarian, Teutonic or Lebanese knights).
    1. +4
      April 6 2024 07: 58
      The Goths and the rest of the Germans were Arians. And they held on to it for a long time. Apparently - to emphasize their difference from the Roman population. Which led, among other things, to the collapse of all the early medieval barbarian kingdoms. Clovis turned out to be the most cunning - he immediately accepted Catholicism, thereby coming to an agreement with the Gallo-Roman nobility and, most importantly, with the church.

      The Germans accepted Christianity for an obvious reason - they actually sincerely wanted to become Romans. That is, to receive official approval from the Empire of their seizures and formally become the subject of the emperor. And if it were not for the stupidity of the administration of the late Western Roman emperors, we could well have seen a powerful renewed German-Roman Empire. In the end, did it succeed with the Gauls and Iberians and Illyrians?

      Of all the Germans, perhaps only the Rex of the Vandals, Geiserich, from the very beginning, wanted to stupidly chop off a fatter piece for himself and send everyone away... And he did succeed.
      1. +3
        April 6 2024 08: 32
        Quote: paul3390
        The Goths and the rest of the Germans were Arians
        Arianism, in contrast to classical Christianity with its triune god and others bells and whistles, was the religion most understandable to the barbarians. But not all Germans adhered to Arianism - the Crimean Goths professed Christianity according to the Nicene canons (Orthodoxy)...
        1. +5
          April 6 2024 08: 36
          No - it’s just that when the Germans adopted Christianity, it was the Arian version that was official in the Empire. At least - most of the emperors adhered to it, including Valentinian and his brother Valens.

          As for the type of presence of the so-called “Crimean Goths”, this is a completely separate question.
          1. +3
            April 6 2024 08: 41
            Quote: paul3390
            it was the Arian version that was official in the Empire

            By this time, Peter’s heir, aka the Pope, was already sitting in Rome, and he didn’t even want to hear about any Arianism...
            1. +3
              April 6 2024 08: 46
              Come on. Dad acquired at least some influence much later. Before that, he was just one of the bishops, albeit an influential one. But even his appointment was necessarily approved by the emperor in Constantinople. The papacy began to gain strength only after the alliance with the Franks of Clovis. And after that, in general, few people listened to him.

              What we will see later is the result of the deal between the pope and the Pipinids. Those who desperately needed legitimization of the seizure of the throne, and only the church could give it. But in the future, the cooperation turned out to be very useful for both parties, and off we went...
              1. +4
                April 6 2024 08: 53
                Quote: paul3390
                But even his appointment was necessarily approved by the emperor in Constantinople

                The Roman bishops began to squabble for power with the Patriarchs of Constantinople almost from the very foundation of Christianity, when there was almost no smell of Germans there! The theme of the squabble is supremacy over the Church!

                Quote: paul3390
                the result of a deal between the pope and the Pipinids. Who desperately needed to legitimize the seizure of the throne

                Yes, that's all true. But we must not forget that Clovis’s wife was a Christian according to Roman custom...
                1. +4
                  April 6 2024 09: 01
                  Yes, everyone there was squabbling among themselves. With no exceptions. Which does not negate the fact of the mandatory approval of the Roman bishop by the emperor. However, he also approved the patriarch in Constantinople.

                  Was. But the Merovingians somehow treated the Roman episcopate without much respect. In general, the wild idea that in their ancestral domains someone other than them could control something was alien to them. Including church affairs. The same Dagobert quite famously gutted the possessions of the church, and when appointing him to church positions, he was guided solely by his own interests.

                  But the Merovingians, who had sacred power in the eyes of the Germans, could afford it. But the impostors Pipinida are no longer there...
              2. +4
                April 6 2024 09: 02
                and off we go...
                Oh yes Pavel!
      2. +5
        April 6 2024 08: 49
        Quote: paul3390
        Clovis turned out to be the most cunning - he immediately accepted Catholicism, thereby coming to an agreement with the Gallo-Roman nobility and, most importantly, with the church.
        The Germans accepted Christianity for an obvious reason - they actually sincerely wanted to become Romans. That is, to receive official approval from the Empire of their seizures and formally become the subject of the emperor.

        +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
        1. +4
          April 6 2024 08: 56
          Actually, there was a great chance. When the Visigothic king Ataulf and the daughter of Theodosius the Great, sister of Emperor Honorius, Galla Placidia, had a son, Theodosius... Who could simultaneously lay claim to the crown of the Empire and the Visigothic king. The world could have become completely different... But he did not survive, Ataulf was killed, and the Visigoths decided that there was probably no point in getting involved with the Empire..
    2. +4
      April 6 2024 08: 48
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      the Goths for the most part adopted Christianity in the 4th century, the Franks at the end of the 5th century,

      Under whose influence?
      1. +5
        April 6 2024 09: 48
        Vyacheslav. Your articles are always informative and interesting. good . And about influence... Like Ilf and Petrov - “How much is opium for the people?” hi
        1. +3
          April 6 2024 09: 54
          Quote: bandabas
          Like Ilf and Petrov - “How much is opium for the people?”

          There is a wonderful film on this topic. "The Last Relic" (1985).
          1. +3
            April 6 2024 09: 55
            Thank you. Out of curiosity, I'll find it and take a look.
      2. +5
        April 6 2024 11: 01
        Under whose influence?

        As usual, under the influence of a clear political calculation of benefit. Turned out to be very true. The majority of rulers acting under the influence of sincere faith are not successful.
    3. +3
      April 6 2024 09: 44
      Latvians and Estonians.
      Good morning! The last pagans of Europe - Curonians - north-west Latvia. Subsequently, they became Latvians, having lost a lot in numbers due to their love for hiking in neighboring Sweden and a little for piracy. Something like this.
      1. +3
        April 6 2024 18: 38
        Hello Aoexey!
        The last pagans of Europe - Curonians - north-west Latvia.

        I was puzzled, if offhand, I think the last were the Laplanders (themselves). Their Christianization dragged on from the 15th to the 17th centuries. However, if we take Europe not as a “historical” one, but as a modern geographical concept, then the list of pagans is much longer: Mari, Mansi, Khanty, Nenets, Samoyed, etc.
  5. +4
    April 6 2024 07: 39
    Books are books, and “digitalization” will never completely replace them. hi
    1. +1
      April 6 2024 20: 52

      bandabas
      +4
      Today, 07: 39
      Books are books, and “digitalization” will never completely replace them. hi

      Yeah, maybe the stonecutter who carved the tablets of the pharaohs on the pyramids thought so too!
      For us, the very smell of the binding and the rustle of the sheets means something. Our children and grandchildren... are already facing big questions.
      1. 0
        April 10 2024 15: 09
        Vladislav. I re-read your comment again. I think it's up to us. It’s much easier to bookmark it, spit on your finger and re-read it without rummaging through your gadget. They tried to destroy the books by fire. Paper media will remain forever. Sincerely hi ! Unlike “digitals” (they’ll come up with something new). Failure, power surge - information flew away.
  6. +3
    April 6 2024 07: 47
    Judging by the history of the finds of most Codexes, there are strong doubts about their authenticity... In particular, the Silver Codex. This applies to both the circumstances of its acquisition and the manufacturing technology, language of the source, content, etc.

    The same can be said about many other supposedly medieval manuscripts.
  7. +2
    April 6 2024 11: 12
    . One can imagine what an impression the pages of this book made on the believers of that time, who were not spoiled by the bright and colorful images around them, when they had the opportunity to look at it. For them it was a real miracle...

    A comment in support of the article, and also in order to use the profile to refer more than once or twice to the marvelous pages of delightful books.
    I have a magnifying glass.
    Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich! hi
  8. +1
    April 6 2024 17: 44
    The “Silver Codex”, containing the text of all four Gospels, which was prepared for the Ostrogoth king Theodoric the Great at the beginning of the 6th century, was also written on purple parchment, and it was written in Gothic. Most likely, its creator (or creators) were familiar with the “Code from Brescia”, because they tried to make their code no worse, and they succeeded.
    The famous chemist, unfortunately for believers in the official version of History, became interested in this very History, Yaroslav Arkadyevich Kesler writes about purple parchment: “Silver nitrate was first obtained and studied by Johann Glauber in 1648-1660. He also carried out the so-called reaction for the first time.” silver mirror" between an aqueous solution of silver nitrate and "formic alcohol", i.e. formalin - an aqueous solution of formaldehyde.
    This allows writing in silver on purple parchment by applying text with an aqueous solution of silver nitrate and then reducing the silver with a solution of formaldehyde under certain conditions.
    Therefore, it is completely natural that the Codex Argenti (lat. CodeX ArgentI), i.e. The "Silver Codex" of Wulfila, a monument of Gothic script, written in silver on purple parchment with gold capital letters and dating back to the 1th century AD, was "discovered" precisely in 1665 by the monk F. Junius in Verdun Abbey near Cologne, since it began production could not have been earlier than 1650.
    The motives for making such a unique artifact are also clear: without it, the Habsburgs would have had to admit that at least in the 5th-10th centuries their ancestors were not only barbarians, but also pagan Goths, and by no means the most Christian emperors, continuously leading[quote][ /quote] his family, according to Cuspinian, from Julius Caesar through Constantine the Great (the first “Christian emperor”).
    That this codex is a fake, produced no earlier than the end of the 2001th century, was also proven by the German historian Uwe Topper, even without chemical technology (Uwe Topper .Falschungen der Geschichte.Herbig.Munchen, 65) (Kesler, XNUMX)
    Thus, all existing medieval manuscripts on purple parchment also date after 1650. A.I. Sobolevsky notes: “Purple parchment, with gold or silver writing, known in Greek manuscripts only from the XNUMXth to XNUMXth centuries” (Sobolevsky). Consequently, these manuscripts were written no earlier than the second half of the XNUMXth century and are artifacts.
    1. +1
      April 6 2024 20: 10
      Quote: Seal
      Consequently, these manuscripts were written no earlier than the second half of the 17th century and are artifacts.

      What does it mean? "They are artifacts." They are already artifacts. This is the first one. Second... How to deal with cross-referencing purple codes. Do you understand what I'm talking about? If there is a fake codex from 1650. then there cannot be a reference to it, say, 795? But they exist. So these links are also fake? But they are scattered among different congregations. And they do not come from one source. The forgers conspired and stuffed cross-references into different archives and libraries. But there are also links to these documents... for other years. That is, a forgery of the entire array of documents for a variety of years? But it would be impossible to hide such a large-scale “project” from the public. This kind of thing is well described by Orwell in 1984. But there the state + repressive apparatus is working on this. In the 17th century, such a project would have been impossible to implement by definition. Someone would have spilled the beans or simply sold a secret... So... one single denial means absolutely nothing. There could be other technologies, but you never know. You have to go through the ENTIRE CHAIN ​​of evidence, then it will be convincing.
      1. 0
        April 6 2024 23: 35
        Quote: kalibr
        If there is a fake codex from 1650. then there cannot be a reference to it, say, 795? But they exist. So these links are also fake? But they are scattered among different congregations. And they do not come from one source. The forgers conspired and stuffed cross-references into different archives and libraries. But there are also links to these documents... for other years.
        Historians are just like small children, terribly naive laughing Well, is it really not clear that if somewhere in the 17th century something popular appeared, and even more so sanctioned from the very top, and attributed to “extreme antiquity”, then there are many authors who specialize in writing something according to the section "antiquity", will they definitely use this fashionable novelty? And it makes no difference to them in what years this fashionable novelty is introduced. The main thing is not to cram into such a “document”, which the author is going to date to a time earlier than the one to which this fashionable novelty is officially attributed. hi
        1. +1
          April 7 2024 06: 03
          Are you completely stupid or inattentive? Cross-references are given to documents CREATED AT THAT TIME. It is impossible to fake the language, manner of presentation, and specific phraseology of the century with such precision. And most importantly, there are a lot of such documents. A LOT OF. I repeat. One document can be forged, I have no doubt. Two, three... but not tens. And besides, radiocarbon dating in 1998 confirmed the antiquity of the document. You are simply not familiar with the work of the archive and do not understand that it is almost impossible to “stuff” a document there.
          1. -1
            April 7 2024 15: 05
            Radiocarbon dating? Don't tell my slippers laughing This RU analysis can show anything. Sometimes it hits the mark. However, I explained this to you, but it didn’t feed the horse.
            Quote: kalibr
            It is impossible to fake the language, manner of presentation, and specific phraseology of the century with such precision.
            If you don’t know what’s possible, then don’t pretend to be a know-it-all.
            In one building, moreover, even in one hall there can be 5-6 people, each of whom specializes in a certain “ancient” time. And each of them can exactly repeat and even improve the manner of presentation, specificity, phraseology, and so on, which was defined for such and such a century by the first medieval author who undertook to develop this unplowed field before him.
            Quote: kalibr
            You are simply not familiar with the work of the archive and do not understand that it is almost impossible to “stuff” a document there.

            You're like little again laughing Well, who told you that you need to stuff something into the archives?
            I told And it makes no difference to them in what years this fashionable novelty is introduced. The main thing is not to cram into such a “document”, which the author is going to date to a time earlier than the one to which this fashionable novelty is officially attributed.
            Let me explain that if some author of the 17th century, having learned about the introduction of the Silver Code into use, decided to introduce it into his “historical narrative source,” which the author intends to attribute to the 9th or 10th century, then he will do this completely calmly . And this work with the mention of the Silver Code, attributed by the author to the ninth or tenth century, will end up in the archives later, a hundred or even two hundred years later.
            1. 0
              April 7 2024 15: 22
              Quote: Seal
              This RU analysis can show anything.

              It's enough for me that he satisfied the Swedes. Therefore, your opinion has no value.
              1. +1
                April 7 2024 15: 36
                During these two days, I re-read everything available about the Code, both in Russian and in English. And with all the desire to create a sensation, I cannot prove with evidence that this is a fake. Although for any historian such a discovery is very significant. I only succeeded in this once, and... I published so many materials. Shine!
                1. -1
                  April 7 2024 16: 59
                  I realized a long time ago (and have spoken about this many times) that there are no greater naive idealists than certified historians. Well, or their second hypostasis is that they are conscious, cynical money makers on the topic of History.
                  For a significant part of my life I have been involved in all kinds of investigations, I have seen a huge number of all kinds of people from among business managers, from hardened swindlers, then through novice scammers to people who are, in principle, honest, but being placed in difficult conditions (there are a huge number of options for conditions), have made some deviation from the Law and are now forced to hide this deviation from the inspectors. For a long time now, it has not been difficult for me to determine by eye where they are completely lying to me, where they are partially lying to me, where they are basically telling the truth, but are trying to mix a little lies into it, and so on and so forth.
                  Your pathetic complaints against me are strongly reminiscent of the grievances of girls of kindergarten or primary school age who angrily demand that the teacher punish Vovochka, who has the audacity to claim that children are not brought by the stork and that they are not found in cabbage and are not bought in special stores , and they take it out of the pussy. laughing laughing laughing
        2. 0
          April 7 2024 15: 32
          Quote: Seal
          Will they definitely use this fashionable novelty?

          What to use? In the inventory of palace property from the 6th century?
    2. +1
      April 6 2024 20: 12
      Quote: Seal
      The Habsburgs would have to admit that, at least in the 5th centuries, their ancestors were not only barbarians, but also pagan Goths, and by no means the most Christian emperors, continuously leading
      his family, according to Cuspinian, from Julius Caesar through Constantine the Great (the first “Christian emperor”).

      It was no longer important to anyone at that time. No one gave any importance to pedigrees anymore. Strength and wealth were recognized. The Habsburgs had this in full. Just like now... So why falsify any certificates? There is no point!
    3. +1
      April 6 2024 20: 17
      Quote: Seal
      Yaroslav Arkadyevich Kesler writes about purple parchment: “Silver nitrate was first obtained and studied by Johann Glauber in 1648-1660.

      And how does your wise chemist explain that the codex was bound before 1587, the codex was bound, and the sheets turned out to be mixed up... It is impossible to bind something that does not exist.
      1. +1
        April 6 2024 20: 20
        In 1998, the codex was subjected to radiocarbon analysis, and was precisely dated to the 9th century.[XNUMX] In addition, the earlier assumption that the manuscript was bound at least once in the XNUMXth century was confirmed. So screw your chemist. Let him not interfere where no one cares!
        1. 0
          April 8 2024 20: 17
          Silver mirror reaction and purple dye
          Alexey Safonov

          To carry out the “silver mirror” reaction, you must have silver nitrate AgNO3, ammonia solution NH4OH and any aldehyde R-COH, for example formic H-COH, or glucose, which also contains a COH group.
          The “silver mirror” reaction is carried out in two stages:

          1. It is necessary to obtain an ammonia solution of silver oxide [Ag(NH3)2]OH. To do this, take a 1% solution of silver nitrate and add a 25% aqueous solution of ammonia to it:
          2AgNO3 + 2NH3 + H2O = Ag2Ov + 2NH4NO3
          First, a precipitate of silver oxide Ag2O appears. The ammonia solution must be added until silver oxide Ag2O goes into solution in the form of a complex salt:
          Ag2O + 4NH3 + H2O = 2[Ag(NH3)2]OH
          2. To carry out the “silver mirror” reaction, an aldehyde is added to the solution of diammine silver hydroxide:
          2[Ag(NH3)2]OH + НСО = 2Agv + HCOONH4 + 3NH3 + H2O
          The resulting mixture is heated in a water bath to 70?C. An ammonia solution of silver oxide [Ag(NH3)2]OH oxidizes the aldehyde to an acid (in the form of its ammonium salt) to form free metallic silver. The reduced silver is deposited in a thin layer on the walls of the chemical vessel in which the reaction is carried out, and a silver mirror is obtained (Illustration 6).
          For more information about this, see Tollens Reaction - Silver Mirror Test
          http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/nat_Fak_IV/Organische_Chemie/Didaktik/Keusch/D-Tollens-e.htm

          To obtain purple dye you need aqua regia. (a mixture of concentrated nitric HNO3 and hydrochloric acids HCl in a ratio of 1:3), tin(II) chloride dihydrate SnCl2•2H2O and gold Au.
          The formation of the dye takes place in 3 phases:

          1. It is necessary to dissolve Au gold in a solution of “aqua regia”:
          Au + 4HCl + HNO3 = H[AuCl4] + NO + 2H2O
          Hydrogen tetrachloroaurate(III) is formed with the release of nitrogen oxide.

          2. Prepare a 1% solution of tin(II) oxide dihydrate SnCl2•2H2O. In order to prevent hydrolysis of tin, it is necessary to add a little hydrochloric acid HCl.

          3. A small solution of tin (II) chloride dihydrate SnCl4•2H2O is added to hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) H[AuCl2]:
          2H[AuCl4] + 2SnCl2 + 4HCl = 2Au + 3H2[SnCl6]
          At first the liquid turns yellow-brown, and after a few minutes a scarlet color appears. This is a colloidal solution of gold, the so-called “Cassian gold purple”, which was obtained in this way by Johann Glauber in 1659. Its color depends on the concentration of the reagents and takes on different shades - from scarlet to purple.
  9. 0
    April 7 2024 19: 31
    Quote: kalibr
    What to use? In the inventory of palace property from the 6th century?
    You continue to amaze me with your naivety. Just ask yourself a few questions: when and by whom was the inventory list of “palace property of the 6th century” compiled? Well, at least when was it first discovered and under what circumstances? For what purpose did someone need, after a thousand years, to compile an inventory list of property that had not existed for a long time? On what basis could this inventory list be compiled?
  10. 0
    April 7 2024 19: 41
    Quote: kalibr
    No one gave any importance to pedigrees anymore.
    in the mid-17th century, no one was interested in genealogies? Are you seriously ? Yes, in Rus' at that time the boyars tore each other’s beards and beat the king with their foreheads - and all because of localism.
    And during the period of the end of the Great Troubles, what was the main thing for someone to lay claim to the throne? Is it really wealth?
    And do you think that it was only here that this happened, and in “Europe” everything is supposed to be decorous and noble, no one was interested in the antiquity of the family?
  11. 0
    April 7 2024 19: 48
    Quote: bk0010
    In the beginning there was nothing, only complete symmetry, and free calibersheep
    flew over the waters.
    wink wink wink wink wink
  12. 0
    April 7 2024 20: 00
    Quote: kalibr
    The oldest text of the monument, written in Vulgar Latin, was created at the beginning of the 65th century under King Clovis I and consisted of XNUMX chapters (“titles”).
    True, the original of this document, as has become a tradition in History, disappeared at an unknown time. Moreover, it is not even known who has ever held this original in their hands. So far no one has confessed.
    The variants that have come down to us are later compilations and represent abbreviated or expanded (by means of “additions”) treatments of an ancient text that has disappeared into oblivion. Or maybe this ancient text, which disappeared in vain, never existed? And so to speak, the text of Salic Truth, written in the Renaissance, began to “multiply”? That’s why the original disappeared, because from the composition of the paper and ink one could understand that the text is not so ancient hi
    1. 0
      April 8 2024 20: 30
      Quote: Seal
      Maybe

      Everything for you is based on “maybe”. I see you are a fan of “conspiracy theory”. Well, congratulations, there is a “conspiracy of watchmakers”, “pilots”, “doctors”, you have discovered a “conspiracy of historians”. But you are scribbling your verses in vain. I don’t need to retell other people’s works. Get your own first. I have already written to you that in order to argue with me competently, you need to: complete a history course, graduate school in history, no matter what, work in archives and with documents, write and defend a dissertation, a Ph.D. Write several monographs for your doctoral dissertation... you may no longer need to defend it if there are such monographs. And only then, maybe I’ll listen to you, or rather, carefully read what you wrote. In the meantime, everything you write here costs me the price of toilet paper. So don't try. I suggested that you write an article. You are afraid and prefer to write comments. Well, you can’t stop a person from doing what he wants. So get busy...
  13. -1
    April 8 2024 21: 32
    Quote: kalibr
    You have discovered a "conspiracy of historians".
    Another nonsense. There is no “conspiracy of historians”. As I have noted many times, there is the greatest naivety of the huge mass of professional historians (95%) and the cynical earning of dough by the remaining 5 percent of professional historians.
    As I already said, the problem with historians is that they become historians without having previously mastered any normal profession, without having received a normal, preferably engineering, education.
    Having moved from school to university, history students have been respectfully and carefully memorizing the lectures of their teachers for more than 200 years. Any dissident students, so to speak, are washed away by the educational process in the first, second, or maximum third years.
    Where did those first professors who started teaching history get their “knowledge” from? Yes, from the amateurs who composed this History.
    The first real historians, well, not historians, but writers on the topic of history, are the 15th century. In Eastern Europe these are Jan Dlugosz and Matvey Miechowski. Based on their historical or, more correctly, pseudo-historical fantasies, Europe formed its opinion about us.
    Also, European opinion about us was shaped by a certain Baron Herberstein or someone else who wrote under this pseudonym.
    When Sweden needed to justify its rights to the “Kemsk volost”, Peter Petrey de Erlesund entered the arena, who “proved” that the Varangians, who are Swedes, were called to Rus'.
    Innocent Gisel, who was from East Prussia and belonged to the Socinian Church, summed it up. Gisel completed courses in history, theology and jurisprudence at the Lviv Jesuit College. And this Socinian Protestant, who studied at a Jesuit college and converted for some reason to Orthodoxy, composed and published a Synopsis in the printing house of the Kiev Pechersk Lavra in 1674. Which became the main textbook on the history of Rus' for almost 100 years.
    The histories of other European countries, and together with World History, were composed according to the same scheme.
    Ancient History, as I have said many times, is based on Daniel’s prophecy about four successive kingdoms. Well, on other biblical subjects. If the Jews suffered in Egypt, then there must be Egypt in History. That is, in History it was necessary to find a place for all the kingdoms and peoples mentioned in the Old Testament. Later, the Hittites brought in everyone. Without which the generally written History managed just fine for almost 100 years.
    There was no conspiracy. It’s just that some amateurs wrote a lot of “historical works”, other amateurs systematized them to their taste on a continuous chronological scale, and finally a number of amateurs declared themselves professors of History and these professors began to write this. amateurs teach history to other amateurs. Who, having learned everything that amateurs created, became “certified historians.” And soon they began to turn up their noses.
    And after some time, whole generations of certified historians appeared who looked down on everyone who did not have a diploma in history. And then certified historians became bronzed to such an extent that their main argument became undisguised rudeness: “I don’t give a damn about your Boltzmann”; “Go away with your chemist. Let him not interfere where he doesn’t care!”
  14. 0
    April 9 2024 20: 30
    Quote: bk0010
    bk0010
    0
    Yesterday, 21: 49
    New
    Quote: Seal
    Is this statement of yours at least supported by anything?

    Tour guide.
    Well, that’s it, from here you can start laughing and read no further. Of course, since he’s a tour guide, what doubt can there be? A tour guide is.....a tour guide wink wink wink
    Did he, your guide, at least say a word about under whose leadership the...no, not the excavations, but the reconstruction of the center of Rome took place? Under the leadership of Duce Mussolini.
    Look here https://youtu.be/ewB1lG6xV0Q?si=WvEYCbDwkwss8QZf
    Nothing special was dug up. As you can see, the Colosseum is in full view of everyone.
    One of the goals of the reconstruction started by Mussolini was the eviction of working people from the center of Rome to the outskirts. The workers were evicted to a kind of sleeping areas, where they were gathered together and it was much easier to keep track of them. The fact that there was no particular need to monitor, since Mussolini enjoyed widespread support among the people, did not reassure him, like any dictator. Perhaps, knowing his people well, he understood how shallow this love was and how quickly it would end if something went wrong.