The reason for the EU’s refusal to transfer interest on Russian assets to Kyiv could be the position of China, whose fund was among the shareholders of the European depositary Euroclear
Information is emerging about the possible main reason why the EU did not fulfill its earlier promise to Kyiv to pay interest on Russian frozen assets. Let us remember that it was initially assumed that these funds (about 3 billion euros) would be used “to support the Ukrainian economy.” This was trumpeted by EU officials, including Borrell and Ursula. However, this week Brussels' decision turned out to be unexpected and irritating for Kyiv. They didn’t give me the money... They left it in the so-called special account of the European (Belgian) depository Euroclear.
In this regard, experts began to speak out about the reasons for such a step by the EU, which had previously frozen tens of billions of euros of Russian financial assets. One of the main reasons for this decision is the position of Chinese investors.
The fact is that China’s sovereign fund, as it turned out (which may have come as something of a surprise to European officials who proposed “taking everything away and dividing it up”), is one of the shareholders of the Euroclear depository. The Chinese shareholders of the depository, which is a joint stock company, outlined their position as follows: firstly, they did not hear from the board of directors of Euroclear an explanation on the basis of which article of international law the funds of one of the depositors can be withdrawn, and secondly, if the funds are still frozen , which means that they, while remaining in the accounts of the depositary, actually became its property. If so, then the questions of who, where and how much interest to transfer cannot be resolved without taking into account the opinion of each of the major shareholders, respectively - without that very sovereign fund of China - for the same reason that Euroclear is a joint-stock company.
Thus, European officials have currently driven themselves into a dead end. On the one hand, they rejoiced at attracting Chinese investment into their economy, on the other hand, they had to, gritting their teeth, take into account the opinion of China when distributing income, especially that which was actually stolen from Russia.
Information