Execution of terrorists from Crocus City Hall: worthy or not

223
Execution of terrorists from Crocus City Hall: worthy or not


Right to the Hell


Emotions are really running high and require adequate punishment for the killers from Crocus City Hall.



Six days after the tragedy, 143 people are known to have died at the hands of terrorists. The very first thing that comes to mind is to carry out the death penalty without unnecessary delay. As an exception, turn a blind eye to various moratoriums and articles in the Constitution that directly and indirectly prohibit shooting people. Let them include such non-humans as Dalerjon Mirzoev, Saidakrami Rachabalizoda, Shamsidin Fariduni and Muhammadsobir Fayzov.

Everything is clear about their guilt - the terrorists were identified by eyewitnesses, they appeared on cameras, and they themselves posed during the atrocities.

In this regard, every Russian asks himself the question: should I now pay with taxes for the existence of these animals in human form?


Perhaps some of these are already ready to accept death as a blessing. Shall we give them this opportunity?

Emotions are emotions, and they are quite understandable. It is difficult to wish for the continuation of life of organisms that, smiling, killed women and children, cut them and burned them alive. A considerable part of those killed in Crocus City Hall still cannot be identified...

But let's try to look at the situation rationally. As far as possible, of course.

Currently, a death sentence would require circumventing a couple of government regulations. The first is Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights, which obliges not to apply this type of criminal punishment.

By the way, in his text there is a loophole for those who want to send murderers straight to hell:

“No one may be intentionally deprived of life except in execution of a sentence of death pronounced by a court for the commission of a crime for which the law provides for such punishment.”

That is, if you really want to, then you can.

Referring to documents related to the European Union has long become bad manners, so let’s leave this moratorium behind the scenes. They can be ignored if necessary.

But it will not be possible to neglect the Constitutional Court. Its decision since 2010 guarantees a person will not be subject to the death penalty under any circumstances.

Supporters of killing Crocus terrorists propose to revise federal legislation for their sake.

Isn't there a lot of honor for geeks?

The second aspect of the question is whether the death penalty will really be an adequate punishment for Dalerjon, Saidakrami, Shamsidin and Muhammadsobir?

But the point is not even the loss of some body fragments by individual organisms and harsh detention in the Bryansk forests, but what awaits the killers in the future. It is in Sweden that you can organize slaughterhouses and then chill in a hotel for the rest of your days, with the definite hope of being granted parole. We are talking about the Nazi Anders Breivik, who, by the way, was not imprisoned for life, but only “sentenced to 21 years, with the possibility of an unlimited extension.”

If we compare the costs of maintaining prisoners in special high security zones, then in Russia they spend about 300 times less every day than in Sweden and many other European countries. Life sentences are served in the notorious zones: “White Swan”, “Polar Owl”, “Snowflake”, “Mordovian Zone”, “Torbeevsky Central”, “Vologda Pyatak” and Sol-Iletsk prison, better known as the “Black Dolphin”.

In institutions, everything is in the best traditions - existence according to a strict schedule, the inability to sit down or lie down on a bunk until lights out, and moving around the area in the swallow position. If the rules say that from 14:00 to 17:00 you can listen to the radio while standing, then every day for the rest of your life it will be like that. There are rumors about lights burning in the cell XNUMX hours a day and a blanket ban over the head.

Some especially dangerous criminals significantly reduce their life sentences in such difficult conditions. In 2002, Salman Raduev died in “White Swan” after serving only a year of his life sentence, and in “Black Dolphin” in 2000, serial killer Sergei Maduev died. He was transferred to a special maximum security prison, but his health reserve was only enough for a month and a half.

Time will tell how long the four terrorists will last, but there is every reason to believe that they will definitely last several years - the age of the killers varies from 18 to 32 years. If they can survive longer, then they will experience rapid personality degradation with depersonalization, as well as “increased internal tension and aggressiveness, serious moral defects, persistent antisocial attitudes, emotional and social alienation.”

Simply put, Dalerjon, Saidakrami, Shamsidin and Muhammadsobir will go crazy. We can only wish that they adequately perceive the surrounding reality for as long as possible.

Прецедент


The death penalty for the four terrorists is dangerous not only as an overly humane punishment for non-humans, but also as a legal precedent.

After the execution of the Crocus City killer, prosecutors will have less and less reason to demand life imprisonment for especially dangerous criminals.

No, of course, some degenerate and pedophile deserves death, but who can rule out a miscarriage of justice?

There are plenty of examples of tragic investigative negligence. Alexander Kravchenko was shot for the actions of Chikatilo, Nikolai Terenya was executed for the “Vitebsk maniac” Mikhasevich, Georgy Khabarov died for the maniac Nikolai Fevilov. Over the past decades, forensic investigation and examination have made great progress, and this should, in theory, reduce errors. But no one has canceled the good old knocking of confessions out of suspects.

Or another example.

In 1961, capital punishment was applied to currency traders Rokotov, Faibishenko and Yakovlev, who under no circumstances deserved to be shot. By the way, the legal possibility of their execution appeared only after the decree “On strengthening criminal liability for violation of the rules of currency transactions,” which was adopted after the crimes were committed. The law did not have retroactive effect, but even less so, the three currency traders were shot.


"Vologda nickel". One of the options for placing terrorists in the coming years.

By allowing the execution of Dalerjon, Saidakrami, Shamsidin and Muhammadsobir, as well as, possibly, their accomplices, we are making two mistakes.

First, we deprive terrorists of the opportunity to experience all the delights of the Russian penitentiary system, which is strict but fair. “Black Dolphin” and similar objects were built precisely for such non-humans who can no longer be corrected. Therefore, these four must be sent to hell slowly, squeezing the life out of them drop by drop over the years.

The second possible mistake is the release of the genie with the “capital punishment”. The examples above with Khrushchev, who insisted on shooting currency traders in 1961, are a clear warning to this. Swinging the ax of justice has a high chance of cutting down the innocent.

What is definitely worth deciding on in the issue with terrorists is to completely ban all contracts with the outside world, as well as legislatively exclude even the theoretical option of early release.

We forgot about the third mistake, but it is much more complex and fundamental than the first two.

We are talking about the migration policy of the state, which needs, if not revolutionary, then very serious transformations. There is no point in cutting here from the shoulder, as in the case of the death penalty.
223 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    29 March 2024 04: 08
    Execution cannot be pardoned.
    1. +27
      29 March 2024 05: 32
      Execute. Cannot be pardoned.. These nonhumans should not live.
      1. +6
        29 March 2024 05: 34
        Quote: Crowe
        Execute. Cannot be pardoned

        The point is put where it needs to be...
        1. -1
          29 March 2024 07: 58
          Re-watch the cartoons “In the Land of Unlearned Lessons”, “The Adventures of the Comma and the Period”, because it tells you how to put punctuation marks correctly. And the period is placed in the wrong place, where the comma should be.
          1. +20
            29 March 2024 09: 43
            For the first time I disagree with Evgeniy Fedorov! Namely.

            The author does not take into account the fact that the talk about ABOLITION of the death penalty is now taking place during the period of the SVO in Russia - i.e. about wartime and the organization of the SECOND FRONT by the ENEMIES of the Russian Federation in the rear in Russia itself!!!
            And who told the author that the Russian Federation as a state - in ANY CASE (!) - will definitely exist FOREVER in its current form?! So that at the same time the Russian Federation can HISTORICALLY guarantee LIFE IMPRISONMENT for these terrorists FOREVER!!!
            By the way. They said the same thing about the USSR! Well, where is the USSR historically now with its socialist system! The same thing happened with the Russian Empire in 1917!
            Where does the author get such a non-dialectical-materialistic approach, a metaphysical-bourgeois pro-Western-colonial ideological approach to advocating for murderers and enemies of Russia?!

            TOTAL. For the first time, the author Fedorov revealed the devilish thoughts of pro-Western colonial-ideological morality in relation to the defense of the Abolition of the death penalty in Russia not in favor of NATIONAL SECURITY of our state - the Russian Federation.

            The author has little understanding of what exactly he is proposing regarding the historical existence of Russia itself as a SOVEREIGN state independent of the West.
            1. +9
              29 March 2024 10: 46
              No tiramisu or iPhones for them this time.
              Load alone.
              But those who brought them here are in a circle dance around their cells for life.
              And let the latter feed the former.
              And tactical nuclear charges under the complex, to prevent the entire warm company from being removed.

              So that the Russian Federation can HISTORICALLY
            2. +4
              30 March 2024 05: 02
              I am completely in favor of the death penalty for these people, since military operations are currently taking place on Russian territory, and they are enemies.
              I read about a possible vote on this in September.
              I also read how they dealt in places with those who killed children or were cruel to children or misbehaved with children. Quite recently there were such cases about which there are stories on the Internet. Their prison ended much earlier. That is, it turns out that fair punishment for these non-humans will come from those who will be next to them, and not from the state.
              1. +3
                April 1 2024 18: 24
                Quote: Reptiloid
                I'm all for the death penalty for these.

                Me too, but I would go even further. There should be death penalty for all terrorists.
                1. +3
                  April 1 2024 18: 55
                  Definitely for everyone! Because if people did not die, but were prevented, then this happened despite their actions
            3. +1
              April 3 2024 19: 54
              Tatiana. March 29, 2024 09:43. New. yours - "...The author does not understand well what exactly he is proposing regarding the historical existence of Russia itself as a SOVEREIGN state independent of the West..."

              Not only the use of VSSZ (the highest degree of social harm). but take into account the experience of the USA and China. Particularly distinguished ones, for example, terrorism. example Crocus - ...may be during rehabilitation were broadcast on TV.
              Only peek-a-boo can philosophize. that criminals will not be stopped by the fear of death. There are exceptions, but they are few...
      2. +19
        29 March 2024 05: 51
        I am for the death penalty. A few reasons.

        Non-humans who have a certain nationality have a different mentality. They are afraid of death. Wrong death. And this can stop many people.

        And - maintaining one nonhuman per day will cost, I think, a couple of thousand rubles. Multiply by decades. Just transfer money.
        1. +5
          29 March 2024 08: 07
          I suggested transferring their maintenance to relatives! Let them pay for food, security, etc., etc.! As for the death penalty, I think the moratorium should be abolished, but it cannot be applied to this beast, but so that the next people who want to kill Russians will think ten times about doing such a thing!
          1. +2
            29 March 2024 20: 27
            so that the next people who want to kill Russians will think ten times about doing such a thing!

            Yes, it seems that before people like them went one way, now it’s some kind of nonsense - they fled and then surrendered, and not “resisted and were liquidated”
            I think there, even without the death penalty, the Azerbaijani diaspora will be killed stupidly because the Agalarovs ruined their business
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              April 7 2024 21: 07
              alexoff. (Alexander). 29 March 2024 20:27. New - “...I think even without the death penalty, the Azerbaijani diaspora will be killed stupidly for the fact that the Agalarovs’ business was destroyed...”
              Quote from the strictly film "Voroshilovsky Shooter" - The father of one of the defendants came to the apartment of those detained for raping a girl. He began to ask the locals from the Ministry of Internal Affairs to give him his son. they say - “I’ll kill him AT HOME myself laughing ". The local opera (played by Sergei Garmash) replied: “...If I had known that THIS was true, I would have taken him to you myself.. No. "
              Do not make me laugh - in the “best” case, they will balance the debit with the credit. but most likely they will “enter” the position. bully ...I think so. hi
          2. +3
            30 March 2024 05: 22
            maintenance for relatives

            And not only this. Adult relatives must be recognized as accomplices of terrorists. And what do we hear? "They are good! crying Innocent! crying "
            How does the tongue turn to talk about good things after everything? The most disgusting thing. The phrase sounded. “They discovered diabetes. You can’t get treatment in Tajikistan. You have to go to Russia.” They left, lived for 20 or 30 years without returning. That is, in the Russian Federation, it means free insulin, a disability pension, other benefits for relatives, business, housing, and a young relative is preparing terrorism. What is the situation in the family? If you have lived here for so many years and raised an enemy of the Russian Federation. And screams "he's good crying "
        2. +8
          29 March 2024 16: 47
          I have 4 comments on the article. 1. Just by the way, Breivik was convicted of terrorism not in Sweden, but in Norway. 2. About the fact that life-sentenced prisoners go crazy. I saw “interviews” with prisoners who had already served 15 years. Well, yes, he was thin and his hair was falling off, but he answered the correspondent’s questions quite adequately. 3. While a person is alive, he lives in hope, “what if, what if.” 4. References to ancient times, that they allegedly shot innocent people, are inappropriate for minor reasons, especially in the age of cameras and the Internet, because we are talking about specific cases of mass terrorism - when the perpetrators are in front of the whole world. I consider Putin’s argument that the introduction of death sentences does not lead to a reduction in crime to be controversial, because you cannot get into the heads of those who were planning, but came to their senses. Therefore, I consider it immoral for the relatives of the victims to feed these degenerates with their taxes for the rest of their lives. That's why I'm in favor of execution.
      3. 0
        29 March 2024 08: 32
        Too easy death. In addition, they become martyrs for the faith for other radicals. Life sentence is essentially the same execution, only slow and painful. And for such an execution I am ready to pay not only taxes, but also pay extra!
        1. +11
          29 March 2024 10: 09
          What the hell are martyrs for the faith? These are the devils, in Russian - Satanists! Ask any Muslim about this, he will tell you. Satanists should not live, breathe air and spoil the face of this planet with their existence, therefore only the death penalty, preferably hanging, not shooting.
          1. +8
            29 March 2024 10: 24
            You also forgot about the stake on which such bad people sat for three or four days with all the “feelings”, then they died accordingly. That’s also a good way. And it will be a good lesson for other bad people for educational purposes. They won’t end up with the “Gurias”, and to Iblis (the devil). After the murder of our people, what kind of mercy, even in the form of life imprisonment, can we talk about?
          2. +2
            29 March 2024 10: 34
            Who was talking about Muslims? I wrote it clearly
            for other radicals
          3. 0
            30 March 2024 00: 31
            Ask any Muslim about this, he will tell you.

            Is that true for anyone?
        2. -1
          29 March 2024 21: 42
          You can't execute. But life in dungeons must be full of suffering and torment. Down with liberal humanism, prisons cannot be turned into resorts. Punishment must remain punishment. It is necessary to deny such people the right to complain and appeal to the prosecutor's office and human rights organizations.
        3. 0
          April 7 2024 21: 20
          Ady66. (Arkady). March 29, 2024 08:32. yours - "...In addition, they become martyrs for the faith for other radicals..."
          1. About yours - “...Death is too easy...” feel Why put it off!? Your choice - easy death:
          meet the train lying on the rails
          1st option head.

          2nd vpriant - put only your feet on the rails and “suffer” for the rest of my life. INyour choice. No further chatter! crying
          2. “...at the same time, for other radicals they become martyrs for the faith...” - these who committed murder on holy days. shaking and
          bought for pennies. will they become MARTYRS!?
      4. -2
        29 March 2024 15: 58
        Execution is too easy for them... let them live in torment for 5-7 years
      5. +4
        29 March 2024 18: 02
        Execute. Cannot be pardoned.. These nonhumans should not live.

        A shameful execution on the gallows, and even with publication, will cool the heads of many who want to help terrorists, especially Muslims. And our fools too.
        Grandfathers were right!
    2. +4
      29 March 2024 09: 19
      Yes, differently. Sentenced to life. But to announce to these bastards in a private setting that “at the numerous requests of the working people” they will be executed.
      And take them 2 times a week, either to be shot, or to the gallows, or in the oven. Place it against the wall, throw a loop, put it on the stretcher and fasten it. Well, and then into the camera.
      I don’t think that over time they will get wind of the setup. Before they die from stress. This will be a terrible punishment.
    3. +24
      29 March 2024 09: 31
      I believe that by talking about the death penalty, they are deliberately diverting away from the real culprits of what happened!
      The real culprits are those people who set up a village out of the country, those who organize a “helicopter” distribution of passports, those who from morning to morning pour into their ears from TV screens that the Russian economy cannot cope without “labor” migrants.
      And another question for the president, who stated that the purpose of this terrorist attack is to sow panic!
      What the hell is panic???
      Maybe the president was scared and panicked!
      But none of my friends are panicking! Everyone has only one feeling - anger!
      Anger at those who allowed this horde of savages into the country, at all these festivals of pilaf and national friendship from every iron!!!
      Judging by Putin's extreme statements, when he hears the slogan Russia for Russians, it causes him anxiety and concern! (((
      Yes, Russia is for Russians and for all those peoples and nationalities who live in Russia!!!
      And not for the wild hordes from the Pamir villages!
      And if this causes him concern, then let him live among these “hardworking” migrants, let him settle at least 10 thousand in Novo Ogorevo as a personal example, since there is enough room there for a larger number of his dearly beloved “also Russians”!

      Putin, where is Kherson?
      1. +3
        29 March 2024 10: 20
        Mmm ...
        The only question is - you don’t trust the authorities, but at the same time you demand the introduction of the death penalty - are you adequate?
        Or do you not understand how sharp a weapon you are offering to the authorities?
        The authorities can turn this weapon against you at any moment.
        How many "anti-Soviet conspiracies there were knocked out authorities at absolutely people's power in the USSR? What happened to Rokossovsky’s teeth and Korolev’s ribs? 4 million denunciations fell from the sky? How can this be ruled out now?
        And now we have capitalism...

        Regarding the death penalty, I have always been completely in favor of the death penalty for certain articles.
        But now, looking around, the death penalty is suspended for at least 5 years.
        1. +4
          29 March 2024 11: 20
          It seems to me that it’s time to think about their potential followers and relatives. Deportation of the entire family, all these numerous brothers, sisters, parents, children.
          So that these scumbags understand that they set up all their relatives and ruined their lives. IMHO it is much more humane and more effective than execution
        2. mz
          0
          29 March 2024 12: 37
          Quote: your1970

          What's wrong with Rokossovsky's teeth and Korolev's ribs?

          In the early 40s, Rokossovsky’s teeth were fine, if you look at his photo. He got metal crowns after the war. His teeth were knocked out “According to Rokossovsky’s great-granddaughter, who referred to the stories of the wife of Marshal Vasily Ivanovich Kazakov.” There is no other evidence or evidence. And there is a photo after the arrest.
          There is also no evidence about Korolev’s broken ribs. There is mention of a broken jaw. From a conversation between journalist Yaroslav Golovanov and S.P. Korolev’s wife:
          “- Did Sergei Pavlovich have a broken jaw? I asked Korolev's wife, Nina Ivanovna.
          “He never mentioned it,” she answered thoughtfully. “He really couldn’t open his mouth wide, and I remember that when he had to go to the dentist, he was always nervous...”
          This answer from Sergei Pavlovich’s wife does not confirm that his jaw was broken by evil and cruel security officers.”
          At the end of the 20s, Korolev himself was testing gliders and could well have broken his jaw there.
          1. -3
            29 March 2024 12: 47
            They persuaded them - they weren’t beaten or tortured. They just sat there and relaxed....
            1. mz
              0
              29 March 2024 12: 57
              Quote: your1970

              They persuaded them - they weren’t beaten or tortured. They just sat there and relaxed....

              I did not claim this, I answered the question in your comment, which indirectly (yes, yes, you did not claim here either) pointed to the torture of Korolev and Rokossovsky by bloody ghouls-chekists.
              1. -1
                29 March 2024 18: 41
                "which indirectly (yes, yes, you didn’t claim here either) pointed to the torture of Korolev and Rokossovsky bloody ghouls-chekists."
                - well, actually the Soviet government recognized them as such when they shot them. And then their Soviet power under Khrushchev and Brezhnev - NOT rehabilitated.
                The Soviet government knew more about everything than I did.
                1. 0
                  30 March 2024 00: 59
                  torture of Korolev and Rokossovsky by bloody ghouls-chekists."
                  - well, actually the Soviet government recognized them as such when they shot them. And then the Soviet government did NOT rehabilitate them under Khrushchev and Brezhnev.

                  I don’t know about Rokossovsky, but regarding Korolev, no one was shot.
                  Vyshinsky’s assistant, Mark Raginsky, who gave the sanction for Korolev’s arrest, died in 1991, professor, honored lawyer, etc.
                  The investigators in the Korolev case - Bykov (died in 1987) and Shestakov (died in 2009) - no one blamed them for the Korolev case, although in 1957 Korolev was rehabilitated.
                  1. 0
                    30 March 2024 11: 43
                    “I don’t know how according to Rokossovsky" - Zakovskogl was shot
          2. -2
            30 March 2024 00: 44
            Or he could have fallen off his bike... or he could have broken it in a crush on the tram... you can assume a lot of things. But: if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it is a duck, not a dove
          3. -2
            30 March 2024 01: 31
            In the early 40s, Rokossovsky’s teeth were fine, if you look at his photos.
            - You need to read books, not look at pictures. Diagnosis guesser from photographs, also for me. Such experts must be killed.
      2. +2
        29 March 2024 11: 14
        Quote: Andrey the Magnificent
        Yes, Russia is for Russians and for all those peoples and nationalities who live in Russia!!!

        I agree to all 100! good
      3. +7
        29 March 2024 11: 43
        I'll add more. Remember the wardrobe boy with the “Russian” name Islam. This boy was shown on all channels. No, don’t think anything bad, the boy really helped people leave the building.
        The trick is that besides this boy, there were about six others his age who also helped him leave the building. Do you know why they don't say anything about them? They are all Russian. We made it! Under Putin, being Russian in Russia is bad.
        1. -1
          29 March 2024 12: 02
          “This boy was shown on all channels” - I hope you remember that someone was running in front of the boy with a phone and filming everything around him? And then posted it?
          And around the rest there were no such people or they died...
          All the rest By the way, yesterday or the day before yesterday they showed it on TV - they were given something and talked about them.

          All channels showed the picture that people posted - and not their own filming. But for the sake of "kick" you didn't notice it
          1. +3
            29 March 2024 12: 17
            And you are probably delighted with Muslims. And just like your idol, you hate Russians.
            1. -4
              29 March 2024 12: 39
              And because you hate Muslims, will anything change? Or do we have those 360 terrorists convicted last year - without exception Tajiks?
              A Tajik flight engineer killed by a traitor and a traitor - was he defending Russia or Tajikistan in Ukraine?
              1. +5
                29 March 2024 13: 05
                It's not about hatred. Russia is my home, why do I need uninvited strangers who also want to be masters here.
                1. -3
                  29 March 2024 13: 24
                  Russia is my home, why do I need uninvited strangers who also want to be masters here.

                  Not a bad position. I understand it. Although it’s too primitive for me, but oh well.
                  But here’s a question for you: you fought for the Bolsheviks. How does this position fit in with the precepts of the classics? This is what Lenin said.
                  Aliens to you are the Russian bourgeoisie, even the small ones, even the small rural ones (those who have more than one cow). And also security forces of all stripes, from officers to what Lenin called gendarmes. And the poor and, above all, the workers of all countries, regardless of nationality and religion, are yours. That is, these Tajiks at construction sites MUST BE YOUR OWN, and the FSB special forces who were detained by their enemies.
                  1. +6
                    29 March 2024 14: 20
                    Somehow you are simplifying it. Not for the Bolsheviks, but for the Soviet Union.
                    How can there be our own people who don’t even speak Russian, but I listen to this all day long...
                    1. 0
                      29 March 2024 16: 34
                      Not for the Bolsheviks, but for the Soviet Union.

                      Well, no, we are all for the USSR, me and you and Putin.
                      And you are for the All-Union Communist Party of Belarus like Tatra.
                      Or I don’t understand you, maybe I’m dumb.

                      Regarding strangers, I think there is a consensus in this country.
                      If for some reason a certain number of foreigners came here and formed a community that does not want to accept OUR culture, customs, mentality, religion (that is, right according to the proverb with its own charter to the monastery), then this community should be removed from the country immediately after disappearance of the cause. That is, they built a bridge there, for example, let’s all go home.

                      And if the need to involve them is discussed, then this rule should be indisputable.
                      As far as I know, the Orans are now thinking about this.
                      1. +1
                        29 March 2024 18: 00
                        Putin believes that after Nicholas 2, there was immediately Yeltsin. I don’t agree with Tatra on everything, but I always support her.
                        We don't need strangers. If only they are deceiving and there are no longer 140 million in the country.
                    2. -4
                      29 March 2024 19: 42
                      Somehow you are simplifying it. Not for the Bolsheviks, but for the Soviet Union.
                      How can there be our own people who don’t even speak Russian, but I listen to this all day long...

                      - I adore you and people like you...
                      They hit themselves in the right chest with their left heel, shouting, “What a good USSR it was,” and then sweetly moan, “I want the USSR - but without chocks!!”
                      I can’t even imagine more Goebbelsism...
                      These moaners in the USSR they forget that Pushkin is a Negro by his great-grandfather, Lermontov is a Scot, Dzerzhinsky and Rokosovsky are Poles ( belay ), and Stalin and Beria in general"persons of Caucasian nationality."
                      1. -1
                        29 March 2024 20: 05
                        You approach people too simply. I'm not saying that the USSR was good. I’m just against being insulted. He is no longer there; the one who is gone is either good or not at all.
                        As for nationalities, if we don’t take extremes, then they were all Soviet.
                      2. -3
                        29 March 2024 22: 26
                        As for nationalities, if we don’t take extremes, then they were all Soviet. - that is, if now suddenly USSR v.2 and the Taj SSR are part of it, and Tajiks walk around your city because they are Soviet - then you are against this not do you mind?
                        Did I understand you correctly?
        2. +6
          29 March 2024 14: 54
          When they handed him the diploma, his mother, wrapped in a black scarf, stood behind him and his daddy at a respectful distance. All the same.
      4. +2
        29 March 2024 12: 54
        Judging by Putin's extreme statements, when he hears the slogan Russia for Russians, it causes him anxiety and concern! (

        And he calls it right. You yourself wrote why. Because not a comma, but half of the slogan was thrown out. Because it's right.
        Yes, Russia is for Russians and for all those peoples and nationalities who live in Russia!!!


        AND EVEN MORE CORRECTLY
        Russia for Russian citizens.
        Briefly and clearly.
        Not for migrant workers, not for foreign investors, not for globalist human rights activists, but for Russian citizens.
      5. +3
        29 March 2024 14: 24
        Quote: Andrey the Magnificent
        I believe that by talking about the death penalty, they are deliberately diverting away from the real culprits of what happened!

        How damn I agree with you! They just made a good whistle out of this death penalty and let off some steam! And now, friendly people’s slop is again pouring in all the media. They are not all the same, you can’t judge them all, and other tolerances. As sad as it is, NOTHING will change in migration policy, absolutely nothing. For that, again, like prayers they repeat about trust in the GDP of 80+% of Russians. am
    4. +1
      30 March 2024 01: 03
      I agree - just behead him.
    5. -1
      30 March 2024 11: 36
      Yes, let it be for life. The conditions will be such that they themselves will ask for death....
  2. +10
    29 March 2024 04: 08
    There is an option to bypass both the constitutional court and the constitution itself. Accuse these non-humans of crimes against humanity (in my inexperienced opinion, they committed crimes against humanity), and try them in an international court according to the Nuremberg precedent. Invite judges from countries that practice the death penalty - Belarus, China, India, Iran, the presiding judge is obviously from the Russian Federation. The prosecutor is Russian - and even Poklonskaya, she will look impressive and therefore more convincing. Let Tajikistan hire as many defenders for its citizens as they want and from where they want, and even from/from. Procedural standards are exactly like Nuremberg. A sentence of hanging is quite expected. And it doesn’t matter that in the Russian Federation execution is prescribed in law; Nazi criminals were hanged after the war, since this is exactly what is written in international law, which, when necessary, is placed above national law.
    And the execution procedure is based on the Iranian model. Bring the crane as close as possible to the crime scene, and little by little, it will work.
    1. +9
      29 March 2024 06: 14
      Why is it so difficult? Just lift the moratorium and execute. It is a great honor for them to collect something else international.
      1. -1
        29 March 2024 06: 16
        Quote: 123_123
        Just lift the moratorium and execute.
        Not easy. Even if the moratorium is lifted immediately, the cancellation does not have retroactive effect. Do you need the whining of liberals across the country and around the world?
        1. +8
          29 March 2024 08: 56
          yes, you complicate everything in the zone, anything can happen, you can accidentally jump from a shkonar to a mop with a point and hang there, you can dive into a bucket and drown, or you can just commit suicide on the doorframe, but there are ways, there is a carriage and it’s more difficult to solve the problem only with the operational unit
          1. man
            +1
            29 March 2024 10: 42
            Quote from Mazunga
            yes, you complicate everything in the zone, anything can happen, you can accidentally jump from a shkonar onto a mop with a point and hang there, you can dive into a bucket and drown

            Well, what if it doesn’t hit you right away, you have to worry about it. Or he breaks the mop, you won’t have enough mops. And who will then pull the mop out of it and wash it, it’s government property after all. What if he turns out to be a homosexual, and instead of punishment he gets a death buzz.
            I suggest just burning them alive, like they burned witches in the Middle Ages. Modest and tasteful fellow
            1. +2
              29 March 2024 13: 23
              Yes, I think he will have a lot of love))) the whole squad will love him and more than once there are enough right people there too
        2. 0
          29 March 2024 23: 38
          Quote: Nagan
          Quote: 123_123
          Just lift the moratorium and execute.
          Not easy. Even if the moratorium is lifted immediately, the cancellation does not have retroactive effect. Do you need the whining of liberals across the country and around the world?

          What do you mean - it doesn't? wink You are not confusing a court decision, even a Constitutional one, with criminal law. This Law establishes the terms of its action in space and time, and if you open it now, suddenly it turns out that everything is sunny there with the imposition of the death penalty, it is established for a number of offenses.
          The court's decision imposed a ban on the use of the death penalty at the current time, but this does not mean that it has a statute of limitations on the act until the ban is lifted - because the law is higher and it is valid. The ban (moratorium) in the form of a decision at the time before the consideration of the case on the merits in a criminal court will disappear - immediately a conviction can be made and punishment in accordance with the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in full.
          And, by the way, Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - on the abolition of the death penalty - Russia signed in 1997, but did not ratify, the author is burning.
    2. +1
      29 March 2024 12: 58
      Yes, this is also a completely legal solution.
      1. +1
        29 March 2024 13: 25
        not only legal, but also correct, it will be easy to kill a bullet, but here you will still have to earn death
  3. +6
    29 March 2024 04: 21
    I only know one thing: they shouldn’t die quickly. They didn't deserve this.
    1. 0
      29 March 2024 05: 36
      Waiting for death is worse than death itself. When they can come for you any day. And again about the “miscarriage of justice”... What kind of mistake can there be for something like this?
      1. 0
        29 March 2024 09: 03
        Will it be limited to these?
        1. 0
          29 March 2024 09: 31
          Tell me, have there been many miscarriages of justice on execution charges? I mean the period since the abolition of the death penalty, starting in the 60s? This measure was applied specifically for especially dangerous charges, and not for the notorious “spikelets”
          1. +3
            29 March 2024 09: 38
            How do you know if there is a miscarriage of justice? Open the statistics and look at the average% of acquittals: Europe/USA from 5 to 20%, Russia - less than 1%. There is no need to look at the Russian judicial system through rose-colored glasses; if you end up in a courthouse as an accused, the only question is the measure of restraint, and not whether you will be acquitted. And if the death penalty appears, I’m afraid to imagine how many people will go to the other world for slander, and how many for an envelope in the back room.
            1. +1
              29 March 2024 16: 11
              No, well, if you are from the diaspora, then they may well justify it. Examples of the sea. And if you are Russian, then yes, you will sit down. Again, we have some kind of trashy empire on the contrary, when will we stop stepping on this rake?
              And yes, officials also constantly get sent away, how can I forget.
            2. 0
              30 March 2024 00: 49
              Yes, there are a lot of examples in the modern history of the Russian Federation when a jury acquitted, but the prosecutor’s office lodged a protest and another court reconsidered. And he was found guilty... yes.
          2. +1
            29 March 2024 10: 29
            “This measure was strictly applied for especially dangerous offenses, and not for the notorious “spikelets” - at least 3 people were shot instead of other maniac killers.

            “for the notorious “spikelets” - everything was a little different from how it was described to us. The main task of Decree “7/8” was the fight against theft in transport - railway workers simply deliberately committed wrecks/accidents - in order to rob. With the introduction of “2/7”, the number of railway accidents and disasters decreased from 8 to 62 per year, and then to about 000. And throughout the war the figure was approximately the same, despite the bombings/saboteurs/mess.
            1. 0
              30 March 2024 01: 08
              The main objective of Decree "7/8" was to combat theft in transport

              I remember that Decree 7/8 did not favor Zheglov to Ruchechnik at all for the railway.
              1. -1
                30 March 2024 12: 46
                Decree 7/8 Zheglov did not favor Ruchechnik at all for the railway. -you noticed correctly - he "sewed" things. In general, this is his only unsuccessful role - thanks to his brilliant acting, everyone perceives a negative character as a positive one.
                And according to 7/8 - Ruchechnik, in principle, obviously did not fall under it. This is precisely what the authors emphasized - that Zheglov was “sew" affairs .
                The decree clearly states which thieves it applies:
                "Equate in value cargo by rail and water transport to state property and strengthen the security of these cargoes in every possible way.
                .....................
                II.
                1. Equate in value the property of collective farms and cooperatives (harvest in the fields, public reserves, livestock, cooperative warehouses and stores, etc.) to state property and strengthen in every possible way the protection of this property from theft."
                The Bolshoi Theater is 200% not railway or water transport, and certainly not collective farm property....
                I repeat - at the time of writing the book all knew perfectly well what the “grandfather’s decree” was about and perfectly understood the illegality of its application to Ruchechnik
      2. 0
        29 March 2024 12: 05
        Regarding miscarriages of justice: this is really a problem. Everything is really clear with these degenerates, but the decision to abolish the execution will not only depend on them. And fatal mistakes are possible there; the author even gave examples. So the issue is truly controversial, especially taking into account the conditions of detention on death row. True, the prospect of the death penalty would probably have a strong effect on mercenaries of all stripes.
  4. +12
    29 March 2024 04: 26
    But it will not be possible to neglect the Constitutional Court.

    This is probably a piece of humor
    No, of course, some degenerate and pedophile deserves death, but who can rule out a miscarriage of justice?

    The problem is that in our reality, a common miscarriage of justice is not only the imprisonment of the innocent, but also the pardoning of the guilty - for various reasons.
    Of the cases related to this, it is enough to recall “Azov”.
    So there is always a chance with the gift of iPhones and going to resorts.
    1. +3
      29 March 2024 12: 13
      But when a week ago I remembered about business jets and iPhones, I was insinuated.
      Everything is going as planned, now the interested parties will catch up and they will go home to “serve” their sentence.
  5. +7
    29 March 2024 05: 07
    Strongly disagree with the author.
    Fedorov, take the terrorists’ entire lives out of your own pocket.
    All the delights of our penal system are being nullified by human rights activists who demand human conveniences for these non-humans, regular food, a roof over their heads, medical care, newspapers, books to read... I’m sure they will be given other concessions like Breivik... he’s completely mad and crazy about impunity.
    The genie with the death penalty is Fedorov's fiction and fantasy... the death penalty can be postponed indefinitely... a year, 10 years, 20 years... let murderers, rapists, and terrorists suffer while waiting for it.
    The introduction of the death penalty has no effect on migrant policy...look at Saudi Arabia and the USA where the death penalty is officially permitted...so the author is blatantly lying here.
    As for the constitutional court, the problem can also be solved... it is enough to change its composition to more sane judges and it is necessary to remove lobbyists like Klishas from the State Duma who are cutting down at the root all the demands of our society... nothing good will happen as long as they sit there.
    1. +3
      29 March 2024 05: 53
      Come on! It’s not about Fedorov, but about those complete liberals who gave him this idea. And they have now turned into senile people. Old people in the Constitutional Court and the Kremlin
    2. +7
      29 March 2024 08: 38
      But this is a good idea - uncertainty about the enforcement date. I agree with this one hundred percent. Another thing would be to run the roulette every day, whether or not to carry it out. And let them know about it! And every day will be the last!
  6. +11
    29 March 2024 05: 24
    No, of course, some degenerate and pedophile deserves death, but who can rule out a miscarriage of justice?
    The people of Azov, who were also worthy of death, were simply exchanged, they weren’t even tried... Or the members of Tsapkov’s gang, who were pardoned, supposedly washed away their crimes that they committed against their own, they washed away with blood. But what about those who do not care about the safety of citizens and some entertainment centers burn even without terrorists? Or is it simply negligence in such cases?
  7. +10
    29 March 2024 05: 33
    the guarantor said; "We're not like that." So the topic is closed. hypothetically....was there life on Mars? the topic is more relevant.
  8. +10
    29 March 2024 05: 40
    Contradictions with the Constitutional Court are something far-fetched. They themselves led the cancer around the corner and now they don’t seem to know what to do.

    Reasoning “how not to destroy innocent people because of a mistake” is a complete mockery of common sense. Then it is necessary to ban surgery and all motor vehicles. Otherwise, as if due to a driver’s error, you won’t run into someone......

    The moratorium on executions can be lifted to a limited extent. For decisions of the Supreme Court and subject to the fulfillment of conditions that exclude abuse.

    There is actually no problem here, but there is someone’s very high interest.... Life imprisonment is convenient because you can then quietly release the convicted criminal into freedom....be it legal or not... . But if you were shot, then for sure even the biggest boss won’t save you.
  9. +10
    29 March 2024 05: 51
    In this case, a crime under the article terrorism requires severe penalties. A terrorist must know that he will not be able to stay in prison. Punishment must be as severe and swift as possible. From history, one can recall the military courts of Stolypin, when terrorism and especially serious crimes were tried and sentenced within 48 hours. Of course, there were excesses and they were later canceled, but they showed that the murders of government officials had sharply declined.
    1. +2
      29 March 2024 06: 10
      Of course there were excesses

      For example, the execution by a military court of a peasant, in front of whose eyes a Cossack killed his only five-year-old son, and he took revenge on him.
      1. 0
        29 March 2024 06: 21
        And what does the Cossack have to do with it? There are many other examples of violations of justice. The Bolsheviks generally burned out Cossack villages in order to destroy the Cossacks as a class.
        1. +2
          29 March 2024 06: 38
          And what does the Cossack have to do with it?

          Despite the fact that the Cossacks gladly performed punitive functions in relation to the peasantry.
          And what you write about about the Bolsheviks was a consequence: in retaliation, during the Civil War, peasants in gray overcoats did the same.

          PS I don’t justify this situation, especially since my ancestors are Black Sea Cossacks, but that’s why it’s historical truth: qui pro quo
          1. +2
            29 March 2024 06: 50
            That is, you recognize the genocide of the Cossacks, where neither old nor small were spared, and justify it with historical truth? Sorry, but according to modern concepts, this is genocide and terrorism, no matter for what reason.
            1. +4
              29 March 2024 06: 57
              Genocide (from the Greek γένος - clan, tribe and Latin caedo - I kill) is a form of mass violence, which the UN defines as actions committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, any national, ethnic, racial or religious group.
              The Cossacks have never been a separate ethnic group; they are part of the Russian people that took part in the Civil Class War.
              1. -2
                29 March 2024 07: 03
                This is a controversial issue. And there is no correct answer here. I believe that the Cossacks began to emerge as a separate ethnic group, but this was prevented by the Civil War with the project of the Soviet man. The war in Ukraine shows how part of one people can become a separate ethnic group: the Little Russians really became Ukrainians. Okay, all this is interesting, but not on the topic of the article.
                1. +1
                  29 March 2024 15: 17
                  Little Russians and Ukrainians are two names for the same nationality; Little Russians were an independent ethnic group even under the Russian Empire.
                2. +4
                  29 March 2024 15: 40
                  The formation of a separate ethnic group from them ended with their subordination to the Moscow Tsar.
                  1. 0
                    30 March 2024 01: 16
                    At the time of joining they were already a separate ethnic group. This runs through all the documents of that time.
            2. +2
              29 March 2024 07: 03
              In your opinion, if the Cossacks genocide the peasants, then it’s all the same. By the way, the red and white Cossacks hacked at each other for their sweet souls.
              It’s not like the Cossacks were genocided so much if films were made about them back in 1950. And you use perestroika myths.
              1. -4
                29 March 2024 07: 23
                Is this when the Cossacks genocide the peasants? Cossacks have always been held in high esteem as warriors and the support of Russia, but the Bolsheviks struck a vile blow from the rear, having previously ideologically disintegrated the officers at the front.
                1. +3
                  29 March 2024 07: 33
                  But you need to know history. In addition to the Bolsheviks, there were Mensheviks, Socialist Revolutionaries, Trudoviks, Cadets and 20 other parties, and it was not the Bolsheviks who overthrew the Tsar, and it was not only the Bolsheviks who were agitators at the fronts.
                  As for the support. then Bulavin and Nekrasov are also Cossacks.
                  1. -2
                    29 March 2024 07: 44
                    Thank you, I don’t complain about knowledge of history. It should be noted that it was the Bolsheviks who wanted Russia to lose the war. And this is only for one reason: there were no other opportunities to seize power. Whether it was right or not, let everyone decide for themselves.
                    1. +10
                      29 March 2024 10: 27
                      These are perestroika myths. Lenin did not want defeat for his country, but for the tsarist government, calling for this on revolutionaries in all countries for the success of revolutions, which happened in some countries. After the October Revolution, Lenin wrote: “We are defencists after October 25, 1917, we won the right to defend the fatherland. We do not defend secret treaties, we terminated them, we revealed them to the whole world, we defend the fatherland from the imperialists. We defend, we will win."
                    2. +5
                      29 March 2024 11: 35
                      You don’t know history, but the Black Hundred nonsense that was sold to you instead of history...

                      If all your Cossacks were liquidated, then who did Sholokhov write about???
                      1. +1
                        29 March 2024 15: 59
                        He described the period until the early 30s, just when active dispossession and decossackization began. By the 80-90s, there were almost no Cossacks in the places he described. There were a small number of their descendants who can only be called Cossacks conditionally. By that time, in the former Cossack farms, the greatly reduced population consisted of Russian Ukrainians and the grandchildren of those Cossacks... there were also Mari, Chechens, Ingush, and workers from Central Asia began to appear.
                    3. +3
                      29 March 2024 11: 45
                      And at the Parade on June 24, 1945 on Red Square, formations took place in the recognizable uniform of the Cossacks...

                      It’s another matter if these Cossacks are strangers to you, and that scum... that fought on Hitler’s side and tried to escape to the western zone of occupation is theirs... The same ones who were later extradited by the allies... If we’re talking about these " Cossack women" and shedding all sorts of tears for Skin, then...
                2. BAI
                  +5
                  29 March 2024 11: 32
                  but the Bolsheviks struck a vile blow from the rear, having previously ideologically disintegrated the officers at the front.

                  Learn history. The front was destroyed by Kerensky's company. The collapse started from him. What do the Bolsheviks have to do with it?
                3. +1
                  29 March 2024 14: 59
                  Always like this? Who and why did Peter the Great hang and exile? And then Ekaterina.
            3. +3
              29 March 2024 11: 41
              Quote: Glock-17
              That is, you recognize the genocide of the Cossacks, where neither old nor small were spared, and justify it with historical truth?

              Sholokhov described the civil war well in "Quiet Don". Among the Cossacks, first of all. What genocide are we talking about?
              PS This book should be included in the school curriculum. Like all the writer's works.
              1. +2
                29 March 2024 16: 02
                Do you think everything happened like that? They wouldn't let him write the truth
                1. +1
                  29 March 2024 16: 16
                  Quote: VZEM100
                  Do you think everything happened like that? They wouldn't let him write the truth

                  The truth about the Civil War is even worse.

                  Quote: VZEM100
                  He described the period until the early 30s, just when active dispossession and decossackization began.

                  This means that they have only heard about “Virgin Soil Upturned”. However!
                  "Cinema is the most important of the arts" V.I. Lenin.
                  As an example. "When the Cossacks Cry" Film based on the stories of M.A. Sholokhov. About what time? wink
                  1. +1
                    29 March 2024 16: 18
                    .............early 20s.
                    after the 30s of dispossession and collectivization, he had no one and nothing to write about
                    You know that they wanted to arrest him too, but he was lucky to be warned in time and as a result of an appeal to Stalin, the arrest did not take place.
                    1. +2
                      29 March 2024 16: 34
                      Quote: VZEM100
                      ...after the 30s of dispossession and collectivization, he no longer had anyone or anything to write about

                      Well, yes! No way, were the “mummers” at the Victory Parade?
                      More about “the most important of the arts.” I’ll throw it in - “Kuban COSSACKS”. That's what it's called. wink
                      1. +2
                        29 March 2024 16: 36
                        this is about the collective farm and not about the Cossacks
                      2. +1
                        29 March 2024 16: 37
                        wink
                        Quote: VZEM100
                        this is about the collective farm and not about the Cossacks

                        Quote: VZEM100
                        During my school years I read all of his major works.

                        A-and-and!!! Ah-ah-ah!
                        Reply
                      3. +1
                        29 March 2024 16: 39
                        In the summer of 84, I visited the village of Veshenskaya for the first time as a child, and he died in February, so I almost found him alive.
                      4. +1
                        29 March 2024 16: 42
                        what kind of Cossacks could there be under Soviet rule? she eliminated their foundations. it began under the kings and ended under her.
                      5. +1
                        29 March 2024 16: 52
                        Quote: VZEM100
                        what kind of Cossacks could there be under Soviet rule? she eliminated their foundations. it began under the kings and ended under her.

                        As a class, yes. Just like the nobles. As a memory for descendants, no.
                      6. 0
                        30 March 2024 00: 18
                        My great-grandfather told how the Orenburg Cossacks overnight turned into collective farmers. It was even forbidden to use the word Cossack.
                  2. +1
                    29 March 2024 16: 27
                    This means that they have only heard about “Virgin Soil Upturned”.

                    During my school years I read all of his major works.
                    1. +1
                      29 March 2024 16: 34
                      Quote: VZEM100
                      During my school years I read all of his major works.

                      A-and-and!!! Ah-ah-ah!
  10. +6
    29 March 2024 05: 59
    The first is Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights, which obliges not to apply this type of criminal punishment.
    Europe, conventions, protocols - it’s time to forget all this. Now more people are dying at the hands of Europe than have ever died since 1945.
  11. +4
    29 March 2024 06: 02
    We are talking about the migration policy of the state, which needs, if not revolutionary, then very serious transformations. There is no point in cutting here from the shoulder, as in the case of the death penalty.
    France and Marseille, you have more to come, wait.
  12. +3
    29 March 2024 06: 06
    We forgot about the third mistake, but it is much more complex and fundamental than the first two.

    what error? Nothing will change with her, for sure: they will make a little noise, make some noise, and again the process will go as usual.
    1. +3
      29 March 2024 06: 22
      hi If we’re talking about the death penalty, then it’s time to equate corruption with terrorism.” “I couldn’t stand it. After all, they steal! They steal a lot. I wanted to help you, citizens, judges.” (c)
      1. 0
        29 March 2024 06: 40
        hi
        In fact, we understand: this is a very serious and responsible conversation, and not “the cry of the article’s soul.”
        1. -3
          29 March 2024 06: 43
          and not “the cry of the article’s soul”
          And the article is a “cry from the soul” - blah, blah
  13. +11
    29 March 2024 06: 23
    Quote: Nagan
    Quote: 123_123
    Just lift the moratorium and execute.
    Not easy. Even if the moratorium is lifted immediately, the cancellation does not have retroactive effect. Do you need the whining of liberals across the country and around the world?

    Well, firstly, it is wrong and counterproductive to build public policy (and such an important decision, no doubt, affects it) looking back at the so-called. liberals and other groups around the world; secondly, do you think this will somehow affect the current situation? Larger sanctions will not be imposed.
  14. BAI
    +8
    29 March 2024 06: 24
    But it will not be possible to neglect the Constitutional Court. Its decision since 2010 guarantees a person will not be subject to the death penalty under any circumstances.

    1.Suspend the constitution. Execute the sentence.
    2. Find citizens of Belarus among the victims. Hand over to Belarusian court
    1. +1
      29 March 2024 12: 22
      There is a simpler solution:
      Hold a court hearing in the field, inviting all relatives of the victims, providing them with shovels and pitchforks for household work. Based on the results of the review, release the accused on the spot, leaving immediately and leaving the acquitted in the care of these relatives of the victims. They have pitchforks and shovels.
  15. +5
    29 March 2024 06: 28
    As I understand it, the purpose of this article is to execute these people and continue to import their fellow tribesmen. By the way, yes. Nobody wants to explain why amid this terrorist attack. the president pardoned Tsapkov.
    By the way, it would be interesting to see a video or at least a photo of these people walking and shooting. Or were the culprits planted on the crowd?
  16. 0
    29 March 2024 06: 44
    For these people, such a murder is a war against the infidels, and they are already internally ready to fly to heaven. Question: Do they need to provide a ticket for a fast train in that direction?
    1. +6
      29 March 2024 07: 02
      The terrorists from Crocus really want to live... watch the video of their arrest... they are not ready to fly to heaven.
    2. +6
      29 March 2024 08: 32
      Pavel, have you got something wrong? What kind of faith? They killed for money! Not a word was said about the “infidels”.
      1. +1
        29 March 2024 10: 36
        What is important to us now is not their fate, but how they are perceived by the Muslim community in Russia. Someone may consider them “martyrs for the faith” in the event of execution, but on the contrary, it would be necessary for them to appear as pitiful insignificant people. Due to demographic reasons, internal political conflicts on religious grounds tend to increase.
  17. +1
    29 March 2024 06: 45
    What do we have at the moment? A huge number of civilian casualties. The Crocus building after the fire. For some reason everyone turns away from the condition of this building. Can a good building suffer such damage after a fire? It resembles a structure after either an earthquake or after the explosion of a huge amount of explosives. Can four people cause such damage? As for the executions, this will be decided without us. Like many things that are being decided now.
    1. +1
      29 March 2024 15: 02
      They can if they get help...for example, the “owners” of this barn. Yesterday there was information that about 40 people died from gunshot wounds, the rest suffocated and burned.
  18. +6
    29 March 2024 06: 48
    As long as our supreme ruler rules, the execution will not be returned, and nothing will change, we wait for 6 years. And I agree with the author, death is simple, but the conditions of detention can be much worse and the desired death will come very quickly there, so why worry fellow
  19. +9
    29 March 2024 06: 50
    On the issue of miscarriage of justice. Theoretically, the option of the death penalty with a deferment of the sentence for 1-5 years, for example, is possible.
  20. +6
    29 March 2024 07: 00
    By the way, there is a lot in Yeltsin’s constitution that is unacceptable for the life of Russia today, especially in the near future. If now these terrorists cannot be executed with the death penalty due to confusion between the Constitution and the decision of the Constitutional Court, then the paragraph of the Constitution should be changed so that the death penalty can be applied to future terrorists, traitors to the Motherland, sadists, pedophiles and the like. After all, one should not think that this terrorist attack was the last. Unfortunately, Russia is becoming the No. 1 target for terrorists.
    We must also take into account that these terrorists, not executed but serving life sentences, will consider themselves media heroes. Visits of all kinds from high-ranking liberal “human rights activists” and “human rights activists” will begin. Even our own ones, not to mention Western ones. All sorts of journalists will be looking for ways to interview these terrorists. And who are they if not heroes in the media, albeit with the “anti” sign.
    On the other hand, looking at it, the media should make people aware of this and about those who are now serving life sentences and are begging for the death penalty for themselves. And not because their conscience gnaws at living, but because the conditions in prisons for those sentenced to life are unbearable. Hell every day and slowly, this is a thousand times worse than instant death... And then people in Russia may even agree to keep these murderers in such prisons so that they slowly die, rather than execute them instantly. By the way, this will be Christian. Their souls in Hell are also tormented for a long time and mercilessly, perhaps for an eternity, so the torment of their bodies for five years in earthly hell in prison until they die, it will even be very short and humane....
    As for all the “human rights fighters” who are already whining about whether there might be a “four” who fall under our care, the danger of these “human rights fighters” is akin to the same danger that came from the so-called “Committee of Soldiers’ Mothers”. If it hadn’t been dispersed in time, our army would have had “fun” today...
  21. +10
    29 March 2024 07: 06
    33 comments and no one mentioned that in this case it is not the death penalty itself that is needed, but namely hanging. Yes, you can even wrap it in pork skin during your lifetime.
    Do you remember how the peasants in Syria hit our hospital and what happened to them? They were found by the SOF, wrapped in pig skins and strangled. No one ever gave a damn about our doctors again. Do you want to eliminate Islamic terrorism? Do the same.
    And the Jews also bulldoze the houses of terrorists and their relatives.
    1. -2
      29 March 2024 15: 04
      This will cause even more hostility from the fanatics. It is necessary to gradually and firmly take the path of banning the construction of mosques, beards and headscarves, and any public religious propaganda. the same applies to churches
  22. +11
    29 March 2024 07: 12
    After Crocus, I didn’t imagine that in our country there would be anyone who would feel sorry for these terrorists. But there were some. They expressed their indignation at the cutting off of the ears. You can’t be like how we are better than terrorists if we have the same methods. Their guilt has not been proven, etc. By the way, one ardent zaputinist. I would like to remind those who forget how Azov residents sentenced to death were exchanged. Well, everyone knows that we are released on parole.
    Therefore, I am FOR the death penalty and immediately!!!
    1. +4
      29 March 2024 08: 44
      It's not a matter of pity or humanism... There is one French film with Jean Marais that clearly hints. Well done French!

      The saving grace of a life sentence for a well-connected person is that it can then not only be appealed.

      The prisoner can be replaced. And even his sentence can be served in parts by several people......he can “die in prison”, there are options and there is time to implement them.
      But nothing can save you from execution, even if you are the brother of the king himself
      1. -1
        29 March 2024 10: 35
        "The prisoner can be replaced.
        But nothing can save you from execution, even if you are the brother of the king himself" - who is stopping you from replacing BEFORE by execution?
        1. +2
          29 March 2024 16: 32
          You're right, It should be clarified: execution is an irreversible punishment, that’s the point. There is no way to compensate him for being shot.

          Here the author talks about the irreversibility of execution for an innocent person. But there is another side to this: for the guilty person, execution excludes the possibility of resorting to the help of patrons. Here, as they say: “and the dog is closed”
      2. +3
        29 March 2024 10: 36
        That's right, you're right. The shooting is irreversible. Otherwise, suddenly tomorrow the government will change and these Satanists will be amnestied and released. Or they will replace the life sentence with 20 years, you never know what can happen..
        1. -1
          29 March 2024 12: 05
          If power SO changes, then we will have very little time for them. The question will be about the existence of the country...
          1. -1
            29 March 2024 12: 16
            In the 20th century alone, the question of the existence of the country was raised three times, so for us this is a frequent occurrence.
            1. -1
              29 March 2024 12: 21
              And at the same time, the population was really worried - what about the prisoners with long sentences?
              1. +1
                29 March 2024 12: 26
                It doesn’t matter what worried the population then, what matters is what worries them now, and if a referendum is now held on the issue of lifting the moratorium on the death penalty, the majority will vote FOR.
        2. +2
          29 March 2024 15: 25
          Quote: Yuri Vasiliev
          Otherwise, suddenly tomorrow the government will change and these Satanists will be amnestied and released.

          More than a realistic option.
    2. -1
      29 March 2024 10: 33
      Well, everyone knows that in our country they are released on parole. - Parole is not applied under such articles....
      1. +1
        29 March 2024 10: 51
        Today it is not applied, but tomorrow some “humanist” will come to power and change the legislation.
        1. 0
          29 March 2024 11: 55
          If he comes such “humanist” - then the whole country will have so much fun that, in principle, it will still be. This will be the second coming of the EBN or the 1990s v.2....
  23. +4
    29 March 2024 08: 47
    They deserved to die; but we cannot change our Basic Law, that is, the Constitution, once every 5 years. There are many other ways to organize Hell on Earth for them, even without tightening the PLS regime. In addition, we need to tighten the immigration law so that everyone else who came here from Central Asia wants to come here; cursed them.
    1. +4
      29 March 2024 08: 57
      There is no need to change the entire Constitution; you can make as many amendments as you like, and this is done in all countries. The Constitution was established by the people for the people and no one makes an idol out of it. There are no official deadlines for how long you can change.

      When the boss needs it, he will do whatever he wants. When it is not necessary, insurmountable obstacles immediately arise. This is truly an unshakable law
    2. +8
      29 March 2024 09: 09
      "but we cannot change our Basic Law,"
      We can’t, but we change. EBN had its own Constitution, Putin had his own. And I’m sure whoever comes after Putin will also want theirs. Why? Because there is a lot of injustice in our laws. And they are aimed at protecting the interests not of the country and the people, but at protecting certain segments of the population, at the expense of the majority. And the people demand death for the murderers! And the people are against migrants! And if the government is for its people, it should pass laws in the interests of its people, and not the Tajik ones!
      1. 0
        29 March 2024 09: 38
        On what basis do you speak on behalf of the people? For example, I am against them being executed too softly, I am more bloodthirsty. Introduce mandatory torture for those who are in a special regime for terrorism and demonstrate online so that others can see what awaits them.
        1. +4
          29 March 2024 12: 32
          Victor Sergeev, are you a master of torture, will you go to work? If you were offered this? Can you? Or will you only enjoy it online?
    3. +4
      29 March 2024 10: 43
      The Constitution has not been changed for more than 30 years! It was written to us by American advisers under Yeltsin, it’s high time to change it! A different time has come and the conditions are different. The colonial Yeltsin constitution is already outdated and does not meet the interests of the country and people. The amendments that were made did not count; they did not affect the basic articles.
  24. +6
    29 March 2024 08: 54
    Of course they are WORTHY! They deserve it 100%. Why do we still have to pay money for their maintenance, treatment, etc.? They should be in the ground and preferably somewhere in a swamp or in a toilet, or even DISPOSED!
    1. 0
      29 March 2024 11: 39
      I will answer you with a paradox; prison means taxes to the treasury, it means jobs for locals. And as for treatment... If the question is properly raised, they will die within a year. It was possible to dispose of it during detention or in a camp for terrorists, but these four in particular; they are needed alive, they must sing like canaries.
  25. -1
    29 March 2024 09: 03
    It is not known what is worse - execution or life imprisonment. My opinion: the death penalty cannot be returned to Russia. Yes, there is law, there is justice, but at the current stage of development of our society, the probability of error is high. After the execution, who will go to the relatives with an apology, and with what person? If circumstances prove innocence are revealed. And so, after the trial, the terrorists will face an unenviable fate. In a couple of years, one will hang himself from boredom, the second will choke on saliva in his sleep. Something like this.
    1. +4
      29 March 2024 10: 51
      And what do you think is the probability of error in this case? There is more than enough evidence of the guilt of these scum. And only kill such nonhumans. And deal with their relatives.
  26. +6
    29 March 2024 09: 14
    Author, the question is not about their “dignity...” The question is not about choosing the type of EXECUTION. This is not an Execution. The question is DISPOSAL of this crap.
    This should become the NORM for this scum.
    Stop talking about the RETURN of recycling.
  27. +4
    29 March 2024 09: 17
    What a kind Author, however. And let the Author transfer all their salaries there so that they can be watered and fed at your expense, and part of my taxes that goes towards this will be returned to me? And stop feeding us stories about how bad life is for them there. They will then live, but 147 people will no longer be there, and these 147 relatives will feed them until their death. But in your opinion this is very fair, right Author? In general, we have a complete world through the looking glass, when someone needs it, they quickly change the constitution and the CC stands at attention without any “kyu”. And then immediately “ah-ay-ay, it’s impossible, this is the Constitution.”
    1. +3
      29 March 2024 12: 28
      And then immediately “ah-ay-ay, it’s impossible, this is the Constitution”
      Yeah, when they want to change it, my God, everyone is rushing about how useful it will be. And when they propose to change it, but don’t want to, they immediately refer to it... Oh, but you can’t, the Constitution, our sacred, spiritual bond, oh , but how can you change her? The KS will be offended, put her in a corner, and slap her on her head... laughing
  28. +5
    29 March 2024 09: 25
    You can't execute - because... a mistake is possible (the innocent person is executed), but kept in “special” conditions leading to personality degradation, bestiality, etc. the delights of “mistakes” humanely? - BRED author.
    All criminals must work for the benefit of society and support themselves at their own expense! If you don't work, you die.
    If you don’t want to work, go into medicine to test new drugs, practice complex operations, etc. And the creatures sentenced to life must become donors of spare parts for those who suffered at their hands.
  29. +1
    29 March 2024 09: 26
    Execution of terrorists
    The article is hype, like a moratorium, yesterday it was canceled. The Basmanny court will make a fair decision in accordance with current legislation. If they live to see the trial.
  30. +3
    29 March 2024 09: 30
    Due to the fact that not everyone understands what life (or rather existence) is
    sentenced to “life”, the presence of such a type of punishment as the death penalty by the state has a minimum preventive effect on the crime before the law under the relevant articles.
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. +4
    29 March 2024 09: 35
    Author, what the hell is the convention and the EU or CE? Russia is not a party to the convention and is not a member of the Council of Europe; I don’t want executions. There is only a moratorium, cancel and execute. But the execution is too lenient, you need to turn life into hell and demonstrate their existence live 24 hours a day, with beatings and torture. These are not people, they are worse than the rats they are testing on. By the way, you can make the content paid and give money to support non-humans.
  33. +5
    29 March 2024 09: 38
    Apparently, some defenders of terrorist victims are far superior to the terrorists themselves in terms of cruelty.
    1. +3
      29 March 2024 10: 13
      Reminds me of the fairy tale “How Ivanushka the Friend Went for a Miracle”, after the robbery of Marko Bogaty, he asks the servants what they would do if the thief was caught. Lots of suggestions. Some suggest hanging it on a hook, others something else. At the same time, everyone understands that all their proposals are not implemented
  34. -1
    29 March 2024 09: 41
    In this regard, every Russian asks himself the question: should I now pay with taxes for the existence of these animals in human form?


    Well, my taxes pay for the existence of a bureaucratic apparatus swollen to the point of obesity.

    A prisoner's sleep on a bunk will definitely be cheaper for me than a deputy's sleep in the Duma. Hai live.
    Although this, of course, can be called life extremely conditionally
  35. +2
    29 March 2024 10: 00
    Referring to their religiosity, they wanted to live. They did not become martyrs.
  36. +4
    29 March 2024 10: 13
    Everything can be decided, if only there is the will of those in power!
    There should be a death penalty.
    Those who are sentenced to life in a cell are in no hurry to commit suicide, but all because there is hope, what if they will pardon them, what if they allow them to atone with blood at the front, what if the state collapses.
    He writes about miscarriages of justice, well, let such criminal cases be considered by a separate panel of judges, and if the evidence is 1000% proven, then to the wall, and if there is no convincing evidence, then send the case for further investigation.
  37. +5
    29 March 2024 10: 17
    For some reason, the possibility of checking and punishing relatives of terrorists - both those living here, in Tajikistan, and in other places - is not being considered at all. It is unlikely that their relatives who live with us, or, even worse, have Russian passports, have a good attitude towards the country that has adopted them. It is enough to check the knowledge of the Russian language and send those who do not know, or those who do not know it well, to their own villages... It would be good to deal with the officials who are letting millions of migrants into the country who do not know the language and, especially, with those who are helping to obtain citizenship of our country .
  38. +5
    29 March 2024 10: 19
    It is necessary to punish relatives as much as possible, although this is not legally correct, but the main thing is to fight terrorist attacks in the future. For those who don’t know, cutting off an ear and eating it is from the same opera. This is where the old dispute between Zheglov and Sharapova comes out.
  39. +5
    29 March 2024 10: 32
    The meaning of the article: to understand and forgive. But essentially. Nazi criminal Hess lived in solitary confinement for 93 years. The author assumes that the terrorists in question will be tormented by their conscience and this will drive them crazy and they will continue to live and are supported by the state like crazy with our taxes. What if they don’t have a conscience like Hess? The author cites as an example the short life of Chechen terrorists. But they sat down sick and not at the same age as these Tajiks. The author fears that if there is a precedent for the use of the death penalty, then the courts will begin to pass such a sentence left and right and as evidence of the execution of innocent people instead of maniacs. But there are thousands of witnesses and video recordings, and they themselves confessed. My opinion: abolish the death penalty as a one-time exception and execute these terrorists by hanging.
    1. +3
      29 March 2024 12: 17
      My opinion: abolish the death penalty as a one-time exception and execute these terrorists by hanging.
      And do this several times. New terrorist attack, unfreeze, execute and freeze again, and so on again and again until the next time...
  40. +4
    29 March 2024 10: 33
    We are talking about the Nazi Anders Breivik

    I remember he demanded that his PS be replaced with a new modification, like it was already outdated and couldn’t handle new games.
  41. +2
    29 March 2024 10: 46
    The death penalty... Before making such decisions, it would not be a bad idea to understand the investigation.
    Interrogate the dudes in blue, you can cut off the ears so that they are more talkative, also with a picnic in more detail, where they were when they were not there, and so on
  42. +5
    29 March 2024 11: 16
    A standard avalanche of verbiage, scientific, and therefore most effective...
    Even the icon of liberals Dmitry Likhachev, having lived for 100 years in different states of “Russia”, after the terrorist attacks in Moscow, suddenly changed his opinion regarding the death penalty. And he is an academician (smart, that means), a victim of Stalinist repressions (motivated much further), a writer (an engineer of human souls). And then suddenly, faced with such a factor, I took it and changed MY (I have no doubt) opinion 180 degrees.
    And here we are being pointed at by Thomas: at Zorkin, at the Constitution, at the EU, and for some reason at Chikatilo...
    Our people are being destroyed (most of the dead are women 25-45 years old, and they nod like those Chinese dummies.
    If there are no people, there will be no judge Zorkin, the Constitution will revert to the status of the curious laws of King Hammurabi on a stone pillar in cuneiform, the EU - now I don’t understand what their promises to us are worth, and, accordingly, ours to them.
    So, whoever makes the Tablets of Moses out of all of the above is a false god. Or not ours, at least.
    1. +3
      29 March 2024 11: 52
      Don't call the Chinese fools. Who gave him 20 years?
  43. +3
    29 March 2024 11: 27
    As if execution would change anything...
    The authorities imported migrants in the millions, and continue to import them.
    The government needs to be changed to one that is at least not against the Russians
  44. 0
    29 March 2024 11: 35
    Death is too good for them. It is necessary that until the last of their days they worked hard, coughed up blood and died like creatures. And it is necessary, as in Israel - they destroy the houses of criminals and drive everyone out onto the street with a black mark. This will make everyone else think.
    1. +3
      29 March 2024 12: 20
      [B]
      And it is necessary, as in Israel - they destroy the houses of criminals and drive everyone out onto the street[
      / B]
      What if the apartment is shared? What does the owner have to do with it?
  45. -1
    29 March 2024 11: 50
    I am not going to comment on the laws of the Russian Federation as such. I just think living in despair is worse than dying, that's all.
  46. +3
    29 March 2024 12: 38
    And a little about the death penalty in one country, of course - in Laos, a visual, so to speak, illustration of Laotian morals (attached).

    And a little more about Laotian citizens who want the death penalty, but do not read the Laotian Criminal Code. And it is useful to read it, especially a Laotian may be surprised, for example, to learn what extremism and terrorism are now in Laos.

    Likewise, citizens of Laos could have guessed long ago that there is no problem for the Laotian state: if it is necessary for someone to die, “someone” will die.
  47. +6
    29 March 2024 12: 46
    In 1961, capital punishment was applied to currency traders Rokotov, Faibishenko and Yakovlev, who under no circumstances deserved to be shot.

    This is a typical condemnation of a historical event from a modern perspective, which is unacceptable.
    Has anyone forgotten that at that time there were 2 ways of human development? Socialist and capitalist. And socialism had every chance to win. And in this situation, the currency trader is the primary enemy, traitor and state traitor.
    Now you can buy a dollar or go buy bread, because there is no more socialism. And now, of course, the execution in 1961 is perceived as savagery. But then everything was different.
    1. +1
      30 March 2024 04: 13
      Socialism is generally social justice. What does currency have to do with it? Foreign exchange traders are enemies because they change currency at the wrong rate. I agree - it's unfair. Do you think it’s fair that the Volga-Don sailors received rubles, and the TorFlot sailors received foreign currency rubles? Do it the same for everyone, otherwise what kind of justice is this?
  48. 0
    29 March 2024 14: 59
    Lifetime! But at first it was unbearably painful to be mutilated so that it would be unbearable to stand, lie and sit. Don’t forget about their relatives, they should be deported to the 7th generation. It would be better to deport all the fellow tribesmen of these non-humans.
  49. +2
    29 March 2024 15: 09
    Quote: BABAY22
    And socialism had every chance to win.

    At the current level of people's consciousness, and even more so at that time, he had no chance. This is a matter of the distant future.
  50. +3
    29 March 2024 15: 28
    Supporters of killing Crocus terrorists propose to revise federal legislation for their sake. Isn't there a lot of honor for geeks?

    Well, there will always be such degenerates, so what, now they should be fed, supported and provided with medical services for life? After all, life imprisonment also provides for this!
    So it’s better to go “against the wall”.
    Firstly, when going after other people’s lives, every such scumbag must understand that he is putting his life at stake, as well as the well-being of his family and relatives.
    Secondly, isn’t lifelong maintenance “with a full package of services” too fat? Doesn’t anyone in our country need state help anymore? Calculate how much money will be spent on someone who is obliged to die quickly, even if not as painfully as possible. their victims suffered, burning alive in the fire, wounded and crushed by rubble, but let them die guaranteed and quickly, without waiting for God's Judgment.
    So I am for the death penalty, as the Supreme Measure of social protection of my fellow citizens. If you need to make changes to the Constitution, make them, I’m ready to vote “For”!
  51. +3
    29 March 2024 15: 34
    We have a more or less idea of ​​what terrorists are capable of. But we don’t always imagine what lawyers and humanists are capable of.
    Sentenced to life in prison for the murder and dismemberment of the victim, 63-year-old Anvar Masalimov was released on parole after 25 years in prison. Moskovsky Komsomolets writes about this, noting the creation of a dangerous precedent. The number of those sentenced to life imprisonment who may qualify for parole is now approaching half a thousand.

    Initially, Masalimov was recognized as a particularly dangerous repeat offender for repeated murder committed while intoxicated, and was sentenced to death. For several years he waited to be executed, but in 1998, President Boris Yeltsin, by decree, replaced his capital punishment with life imprisonment.

    At first, Masalimov was imprisoned in the Vologda Pyatak colony for life prisoners, then he was transferred to the Polar Owl prison in the village of Kharp, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug. From there he wrote complaints to the court. As a result, the indication that he was considered a dangerous repeat offender and aggravating circumstances were excluded from the sentence. The article was re-qualified from Art. 102 at station 103 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR, although the sentence remained lifelong.

    The publication notes that the Federal Penitentiary Service considers Masalimov’s release to be the result of reclassification of the sentence, and not parole, although some court documents indicate precisely the latter reason.

    Now Masalimov may be in Moscow. He was seen in the Church of St. Dmitry of Rostov. There he spoke of his intention to hire lawyers and sue the state in the hope of obtaining housing and compensation for excessively harsh punishment.
  52. +3
    29 March 2024 15: 42
    The question of the applicability of the death penalty is not as simple as the author Evgeniy Fedorov describes it.
    In living nature, natural selection operates, excluding from existence individuals and species that are not adapted to a specific existence.
    1. In society, a community of people, biological natural selection does not operate. But since in any society there are individuals = individuals who do not meet the requirements of the society itself, the death penalty arose in society as a condition for excluding such individuals = individuals from the existence. Moreover, the use of the death penalty excludes not only a given individual from existence, but also excludes this individual from procreation. In this sense, the death penalty is a mechanism of self-preservation and self-purification of society. One can only imagine in a nightmare what would happen to society if, through exclusion from existence, it did not free itself from robbers, rapists, and inhumans and allowed them to reproduce in their offspring and in their subsequent generations. Therefore, the question of applying the death penalty is not a question of creating conditions or “non-conditions” for the existence of reptiles in the zone, as the author considers, but this is a question of preserving society itself.
    2. Now there is a war in which Russia is fighting not just with Banderlog = neo-fascists, but with the entire “civilized” West. And in war - as in war, only the laws of war should apply. In this sense, saboteurs, looters, rapists, punitive forces, etc. should be subject to court martial and, as a last resort, mercilessly destroyed without trial or investigation on the spot. Therefore, any demand for respect for humanity towards humanoids and reptiles like those who attacked Crocus Hall is, to say the least, strange, no matter how this demand is justified. Moreover, in conditions when Russia is in a state of war, waging war with the entire West, compliance with such legal requirements as the operation of retroactive laws is as strange as, for example, the requirement to comply with socialist legality during the Second World War.
    1. +1
      29 March 2024 20: 05
      Quote: The Truth
      ...individuals who do not meet the requirements of society itself...the death penalty arose as a condition for excluding such individuals from the existence...
      Now there is a war... And in a war - as in a war, only the laws of war should apply... Therefore, any demand for observance of humanity towards humanoids and reptiles ... is at least strange, no matter how this demand is justified. Moreover, in conditions when Russia is in a state of war... compliance with such legal requirements as the operation of retroactive laws is as strange as, for example, the requirement to comply with socialist legality during the Second World War.

      I agree with everything except the last statement... During the Second World War, “compliance with socialist legality” was very carefully monitored and lawlessness was not allowed. It’s just that “socialist legalities” were an order of magnitude stricter than they are now.
      To introduce retroactive force of the law is already on the verge of lawlessness. It is urgently necessary to adopt appropriate laws on the death penalty so that the next terrorists, criminals and other ghouls will be rewarded in full.
  53. 0
    29 March 2024 16: 11
    A classic example of a shift in emphasis. Or jumping off topic. What difference does it make how they die? They may die and be sentenced to life in a few years. The most important thing is that the migration invasion continues. By the way, the death penalty will not stop religious fanatics from speaking at all. And the hordes of Asians spread and continue to spread throughout Russia. Unfortunately, everything is the same and the same.
  54. The comment was deleted.
  55. 0
    29 March 2024 17: 53
    Make a herbarium out of them using a rope with a loop, and when it is dried, give it to interested parties as a souvenir.
  56. +1
    29 March 2024 18: 29
    During military operations, when hundreds of people, both civilians and military, die a day, it is somehow strange to talk about mercy towards the killers of innocent unarmed people, including children. For such people, the only option is execution by hanging, or, as a last resort, public execution, so that there is no doubt that the state is unable to protect its citizens.
  57. 0
    29 March 2024 19: 38
    As the detention in the Black Dolphin is described, the death penalty is good for them.
    But we still need to film this stay and show it to correct those who have stepped on the wrong path.
    1. +1
      29 March 2024 20: 08
      Well, yes, the chicks suffered so much that the kebab couldn’t fit into their throats...
      1. +1
        29 March 2024 20: 33
        Tsapki did not sit in the Black Swan. Judging by the recollections of one inmate, special regime prisons go without barbecue.
  58. +2
    29 March 2024 19: 41
    The death penalty has long been a public demand. And the party that includes its return in its program, at least for the next 15 years, will win the elections to the Duma.

    And if you philosophize, dragging in here the historical stages of the country, then here is your answer.

    Nobody talks about the death penalty for political reasons - we are talking about criminal offenses and only about them, and the death penalty for murders with particular cruelty, incl. children is nothing more than a compromise between crime and punishment, between victim and criminal, between prosecution and defense!!!

    Everything else is from the evil one.

    It is not difficult to level out mistakes by postponing the execution of the death penalty for the nth period.
  59. The comment was deleted.
  60. +1
    29 March 2024 21: 32
    The title and the last sentence are enough. Stupid question, murky ending.
  61. 0
    29 March 2024 22: 07
    I don’t see the difference between execution and life imprisonment, but only under strict conditions. There would be something to argue about. As long as it's not about war.
  62. +3
    29 March 2024 23: 13
    Quote: Andriuha077
    No tiramisu or iPhones for them this time.
    Load alone.
    But those who brought them here are in a circle dance around their cells for life.
    And let the latter feed the former.


    That's right!
    But this is not enough.

    Their entire family, all their friends and girlfriends are welcome.
    Mow down this filthy seed, the way the Zionists know how and do it.

    Officials lobbying for the import of migrants, all kinds of Zatulintsy and Khusnulintsy people,
    oblige to begin the working day by visiting ALL the graves of the innocent victims of these infidels!
  63. +1
    29 March 2024 23: 49
    The steam of public indignation is blown off by discussing whether it is worth crushing 4 bedbugs out of the millions available.
  64. -1
    29 March 2024 23: 55
    Quote from realing
    How do you know if there is a miscarriage of justice? Open the statistics and look at the average% of acquittals: Europe/USA from 5 to 20%, Russia - less than 1%. There is no need to look at the Russian judicial system through rose-colored glasses; if you end up in a courthouse as an accused, the only question is the measure of restraint, and not whether you will be acquitted. And if the death penalty appears, I’m afraid to imagine how many people will go to the other world for slander, and how many for an envelope in the back room.

    Do you think it's interesting? hi In the existing criminal legal system of Russia there should be no acquittals at all; this is a defect in work. Because a specially trained person has been allocated to prepare documents for the trial, with judicial powers, whose activities are supervised by the prosecutor.
    Why do you only consider court acquittals? But if the refusal is taken out by a competent person before being aroused, where does this go in your comparative statistics? What about completed cases at the pre-trial stage? Well, when do they stop for lack of an event or corpus delicti?
    Are you counting percentages - can you refer to verifiable data or was it just picked out of your nose and smeared across the screen?
    1. -2
      30 March 2024 00: 33
      Quote: hhurik
      a specially trained person has been allocated to prepare documents for trial, and with judicial powers

      What kind of person is this, what is his name?
      1. +1
        30 March 2024 01: 55
        The investigator is called, and the prosecutor gives written consent to initiate a criminal case. And believe me, out of nowhere, or even with dubious and indirect evidence, they won’t even initiate a case, let alone risk sending it to court.
        So, cases come before the court with triple reinsurance.
        1. -1
          30 March 2024 02: 09
          Quote: faterdom
          The investigator is called

          Oh, that's it.

          Quote: faterdom
          And believe me, out of nowhere, or even with dubious and indirect evidence, they won’t even initiate a case, let alone risk sending it to court.

          I will not believe.
          1. +1
            30 March 2024 11: 16
            It’s up to you, in your community, others decide for you what to believe and what not to believe.
            I didn’t write the answer for you.
            I don’t know this question from internet blogs.
            1. +1
              30 March 2024 11: 47
              Quote: faterdom
              It’s up to you, in your community, others decide for you what to believe and what not to believe.

              I understand that in your perception, everyone who does not participate in the choral chanting is certainly a tsipso, but I will disappoint you - there are also just ordinary people here.
              1. 0
                30 March 2024 11: 57
                Don’t you take much responsibility for interpretation?
                You asked what kind of “special person” is preparing the case for consideration in court - I answered that he is called an investigator, and he initiates the case with the consent of the prosecutor.
                You don't believe me!
                If you don’t believe me, it’s your business, but why are you labeling me “crazy”?
                Honestly look in the mirror and you can see a sissy troll! "The most ordinary people, unknown age, gender and profession."
                It seems to me that you are very unusual.
                And I won’t waste any more time on you.
      2. 0
        30 March 2024 11: 16
        Investigator (inquiry officer) - look at the powers of the joke.
        Anything can happen.
        1. -1
          30 March 2024 11: 49
          Quote: hhurik
          Investigator (inquiry officer) - look at the powers of the joke.

          As a joke, the investigator is asked to solve crimes, so he cannot be impartial and is not a substitute for the court.
          1. +2
            30 March 2024 11: 55
            Apparently, you are terribly far from reality. wink
            Remember and pass it on to others: the investigator is not swayed by hangings (c)

            Termination of criminal prosecution of a suspect (accused) before trial is a judicial function, because the result does not differ from an acquittal. hi
            1. 0
              30 March 2024 11: 58
              Quote: hhurik
              Remember and pass it on to others: the investigator is not swayed by hangings (c)

              I take your word for it. What could we do without it?
              1. 0
                30 March 2024 12: 00
                You can trust me, don’t go to a fortune teller drinks
  65. 0
    30 March 2024 08: 31
    A significant number of articles on this resource receive feedback from its Russian users. In the interests of which management entity? I believe that the overwhelming number of commentators on articles on this resource are engaged in commenting to incite/provoke this feedback.
    The article begins with the words “emotions are really running high.” There is an opinion that the main cause of emotions is not knowing what to do in some conditions, in some situation. And emotions are regarded as a compensatory mechanism that makes up for the lack of information necessary to achieve a goal (satisfy a need). Fury compensates for the lack of information necessary to organize the fight. Fear is for organizing protection. Grief arises in conditions of an acute lack of information about the possibility of compensation for the loss. Lack of information that causes emotions can also lead to neuroses.
    And what emotions are manifested in the comments of interest to the unannounced subject of control?
  66. +1
    31 March 2024 23: 17
    There is no doubt that these scum deserve the cruelest death penalty. But I doubt that they will be subjected to at least shooting (or, moreover, a well-deserved quartering). No. After all, public opinion was rarely taken into account in Rus', and even more so now.
  67. +2
    April 1 2024 01: 28
    Geeks of all stripes knew and restrained themselves - this prevented many deaths of innocents
  68. +1
    April 1 2024 20: 57
    I don’t really care how these creatures feel when they’re sentenced to life. Any punishment also has the function of warning or intimidation, if you like. Even if one of the potential freaks refuses to carry out a terrorist attack out of fear, sentenced to the tower with his vile life, he saved a normal person from death. And we need to think about ways to make the execution public. So that the creatures don’t think that they will have a chance. Only the death penalty!
  69. 0
    April 2 2024 12: 15
    Since the author refers to the mistakes of the investigation and the judiciary when pronouncing and executing the sentence, then everything is resolved simply - for the mistake of the investigation, the prosecutor and the judge, they receive the same punishment that they passed and carried out. Everything is in line!!! And no concessions!!!
  70. 0
    April 4 2024 08: 55
    Execution must be deserved, and these are unworthy. For such people, I would change the law and introduce mandatory torture with live demonstration: Zone 2.
  71. 0
    April 7 2024 12: 08
    They will die happily, quietly from illness or something else, no one will remember