Ukrainian sources: For the first time, the Russian Aerospace Forces attacked an Ukrainian Armed Forces facility on the outskirts of Kharkov with aerial bombs with UMPB

23
Ukrainian sources: For the first time, the Russian Aerospace Forces attacked an Ukrainian Armed Forces facility on the outskirts of Kharkov with aerial bombs with UMPB

The Russian Aerospace Forces struck one of the military installations on the northern outskirts of Kharkov for the first time, presumably using a FAB-250 with a universal combat planning module (UMPB). Previously, aerial bombs of this type were not used to hit targets within the city limits, but airstrikes using adjustable aerial bombs were recorded in surrounding populated areas.

Ukrainian sources report two powerful explosions in the area of ​​the Cryotekhnika medical equipment enterprise, in the premises of which a temporary deployment point for militants of the Kyiv regime was allegedly set up. At the same time, the distance from the point of arrival of aerial bombs to the border with Russia is about 50 kilometers, and to the nearest LBS - about 100 km. It is unknown from which direction the blow was struck.

It is also assumed that guided bombs with UMPB D-30 SN were used to carry out the strikes. Previously, such a weapon was practically not used, but now cases of destruction of Ukrainian Armed Forces facilities in the near and middle zone from the line of combat contact by this weapon are increasingly being recorded.



As a warhead, the UMPB has a fairly powerful FAB-250 aerial bomb. The UMPB is equipped with a jet engine, which significantly increases the flight range compared to the UMPC. Presumably, the range of use of aerial bombs with this module can be from 50 to 70 kilometers.

The massive use of these high-precision and long-range aerial bombs could significantly facilitate the task of destroying Ukrainian army targets as part of a possible operation to liberate Kharkov.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    27 March 2024 19: 54
    However, one cannot get rid of this either. Monuments should also be erected, 10-20-50.
  2. +21
    27 March 2024 19: 56
    Soon the three-liter tanks will fly... wink ...here comes the song bully
    1. +24
      27 March 2024 20: 18
      Guys, destroy Kharkov! There were more nsciks there about 10 years ago than in Lviv in 1945.
      1. +15
        27 March 2024 20: 21
        Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
        Guys, destroy Kharkov! There were more nsciks there about 10 years ago than in Lviv in 1945.

        And how many people “disappeared” in the basements of the SBU!!! Until now, not all names have been clarified. Don't be sorry! Thunder!
      2. +6
        27 March 2024 21: 47
        Don’t forget about Kuev, everything is also needed to zero...
        1. +2
          28 March 2024 14: 54
          “...You will also have a squirrel, and you will also have a whistle...” You need to pull the LBS closer to the Dnieper, reach its line in order to bomb without high risk.
      3. +7
        28 March 2024 00: 58
        So that... everything would be fine in Kharkov! Lviv must be destroyed!
        1. +4
          28 March 2024 12: 04
          Do you seriously think so? In my opinion, for this we need to destroy London and Washington, but....
  3. +18
    27 March 2024 19: 57
    Congratulations! May God grant this not the last time to a terrorist country!
    It's time to open 3-9 liters from the cellars to restore order to independence!
    Tsipsota is resting in the park!
    1. +5
      27 March 2024 22: 40
      Well, at least one and a half rubles flew in bursts. Well, three rubles periodically. 5 and 9 are too heavy for front-line aviation.
      1. 0
        28 March 2024 01: 19
        Don’t worry, there are strategists who will definitely take on board from three rubles to 9 “liters” of excellent quality for the Nazis as a gift from the GDP!
  4. +8
    27 March 2024 20: 00
    Get hurt! The plan for additional burial in action without the approval of the Verkhovna Rada!
  5. +7
    27 March 2024 20: 05
    The past. The spotter, caught in the LHP on 09.01.15/XNUMX/XNUMX, turns in her own.
    1. +2
      27 March 2024 20: 20
      The thieves were already selling it in Magadan. They'll have fun..
  6. 0
    27 March 2024 20: 35
    Why haven’t they been used “for the first time” in Kharkov?
  7. +5
    27 March 2024 21: 53
    Apparently, they had crushed the air defense and now turned around. This makes me happy.
  8. +6
    27 March 2024 22: 01
    So far, Kharkov is a nightmare for Belgorod... For a month now... killed and wounded every day. With things like this, we will soon overtake Donetsk. Multiple launch rocket systems. projectiles are practically not intercepted
  9. +5
    27 March 2024 22: 44
    The place of creation of "Azov" - one of the most vile fascist formations of ukrov! Uproot the infection!
    1. 0
      29 March 2024 19: 59
      And also the patrimony of the scum Avakov. More bombs and missiles on targets.
  10. 0
    28 March 2024 01: 13
    FAB-250 with a universal combat planning module (UMPB).

    Presumably, the range of use of aerial bombs with this module can be from 50 to 70 kilometers.

    Is it somehow not enough for a bomb with UMBP!?
    The bomb is light, plus a jet engine and even wings! With a jet engine it should reach up to 80-95 km. rush. And 50-70 is just on the wings!
    1. +3
      28 March 2024 09: 44
      Quote: Alexey G
      Is it somehow not enough for a bomb with UMBP!?
      The bomb is light, plus a jet engine and even wings! With a jet engine it should reach up to 80-95 km. rush. And 50-70 is just on the wings!

      Maybe not everything should be known? If it flies 250 km, for example, why would the enemy know this?
  11. 0
    29 March 2024 08: 51
    Air bombs with UMPB D-30 SN!!!!
    But if after them there were FAB-3000, then it would be a HOLIDAY to the devils.
  12. 0
    29 March 2024 20: 01
    And this is just the beginning. We just need to minimize the risk of losing our bombers. After all, the SU-34, and even more so the TU-22M3, is much more expensive than Khryakov’s losses.