Source: The use of Invar-M1 missiles by Russian tanks in the Northern Military District makes it possible to destroy all armored vehicles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Western armored vehicles, including advertised ones Tanks, which is in service with the Ukrainian army, is effectively destroyed by Russian tank missiles. To date, not a single sample of NATO equipment has been able to withstand attacks from Russian missiles. An informed source spoke about this.

The Reflex-M guided weapon system, used by the crews of Russian T-72B3, T-80BVM and T-90M tanks in the special operation zone, easily penetrates Ukrainian armored vehicles, including Western models. The Invar-M/M1 guided missile included in the complex, due to its tandem cumulative warhead, penetrates up to 800 mm of armor behind the dynamic protection.

9M119M1 "Invar-M1" guided missiles are regularly used in combat operations in the Northern Military District zone. (...) the average armor penetration behind additional dynamic protection for these ammunition is about 800 millimeters. As a result, all armored vehicles of the Ukrainian troops, including NATO models, are pierced with these missiles in any projection, including tanks in the frontal projection

- leads RIA News source words.

It is also noted that in many cases of the use of Invar missiles against enemy tanks, the ammunition detonation occurs. In addition, the use of missiles makes it possible to hit long-term enemy firing points at a range of up to 5,5 km, while the effective range of Ukrainian Armed Forces tanks, including Western ones, against such targets does not exceed 2 - 2,5 km.

Comments

[kingnothing]

T73 - is there such a tank?

[SincerityX]

Probably a typo, although now you can’t be sure of anything, you never know what kind of crap they’ll get from the reserve, anything could be there, from the tarpaulin boots of the imperial army to flying saucers with death rays

[rotmistr60]

To date, not a single sample of NATO equipment has been able to withstand attacks from Russian missiles.

It shouldn't have been any other way. After all

The Invar-M/M1 missile, due to its tandem cumulative warhead, penetrates up to 800 mm of armor behind dynamic protection.

Thanks to our designers and military industry.

[BAT-MENT]

Attention question. How many tanks have such ammunition, how many crews can use these weapons?

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Batman, I like your formulation of the question. Stalinist style. Brief and clear. But firstly, they won’t tell us this (how much). Secondly, the main thing is that such weapons exist. Equipping them with aircraft is the business of the General Staff. There are no fools sitting there.

[rocket757]

There is no such thing as too much firepower on the battlefield.
It is clear that it was not and could not be an “easy walk” for foreign technology!!!
Foreign strategists preferred to forget that everyone who came to us with a sword immediately remained as manure... and our Cossacks watered horses in the fountains of many capitals and taught the garçons to run BISTRO, BISTRO!

[Byurer]

In fact, the Ukrainians have a similar ATGM “Kombat” for Soviet tanks, the question is in quantity. Although I have hardly seen any mention of the use of “Reflex”/”Invar”

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Burer

In fact, the Ukrainians have a similar ATGM “Kombat” for Soviet tanks, the question is in quantity. Although I have hardly seen any mention of the use of “Reflex”/”Invar”

For example, I have come across... And mentions of the use of "reflexes" in the North Military District... and even "battalion commanders" by high-ranking officers. By the way, I heard about the use of "battalion commanders" recently and once...

[Nikolaevich I]

PS By the way, the developers of "Kombat" proposed a project for a missile with a transverse arrangement of SFZ charges to destroy armor from the top... I'm not "against" something like this being tested on "reflexes"!

[Nikolaevich I]

Newer TOURS "Sokol-V" are also used in the Northern Military District...

[Netl]

Quote: Burer

I have almost never seen any mention of the use of "Reflex"/"Invar"

There are few references.

IMHO, the point here is not even the number of ATGMs, but the fact that the area of ​​​​use of such weapons has become too narrow. Tanks these days are mostly dismantled by oporniks from closed positions.

And here it is required that the following coincide at the same time:
1) The presence of enemy armored vehicles in direct visibility;
2) The distance must be strictly greater than the firing of a projectile, but within the range of the ATGM;
3) The enemy must not leave the guidance zone for a certain time, sufficient for aiming and approaching the missile.

Well, in order for us to see it, we also need to film the magnificence in decent quality.
We observe those infrequent cases when everything coincides.

[Roma 1977]

"Invars" are quite useful. The video has been posted online several times. Both against stationary targets and against armored vehicles.

[Romanenko]

It’s good to have a “long arm”; as a result, there is a lot of fried pork in boxes, but our guys are alive.
If only the rest of the artillery would move beyond 30, we have to reach the enemy from afar.

[eskela]

The Soviet school of tank building showed itself to be super T-80, T-90 will continue to be improved and produced. But the fate of the T-14 resembles the fate of the T-35.

[Alexey Lantukh]

In fact, direct fire from tank guns at other tanks at a distance of 4-5 km is very rare. Such open areas are mainly found only at training grounds. Basically, according to reviews from tankers, they shoot up to 2-3 km.

[Seal]

Quote: rocket757

and our Cossacks watered horses in the fountains of many capitals and taught the garçons to run BISTRO, BISTRO!

With all due respect to the Cossacks... this version is not serious.
The Historical Dictionary of the French Language, led by Alain Rey, talks about the chronological discrepancy between the “Russian” version and the period of the word’s appearance in the French language. In reality, the word bistro (or bistrot) was recorded in the French language almost three quarters of a century after the occupation of Paris by the troops of the anti-Napoleonic coalition. Some sources call it 1884. It would be strange that the French heard the Russian word “quickly” in 1814, then did not use this word for 70 years and then suddenly began to actively use it.
So where did the word bistro come from then?
The etymology of the word bistro is not clear enough. The Historical Dictionary of the French Language notes that local dialects have words that may be related to bistro. For example:
bistouille (or bistrouille) - low-quality alcohol, bad booze,
bistraud - servant, wine merchant,
bistre - a dirty, dark, smoky place.