Bridge destroyer: why Kyiv is so eager to get its hands on German TAURUS missiles

24
Bridge destroyer: why Kyiv is so eager to get its hands on German TAURUS missiles

Recently from news There are practically no discussions about Germany's likely supply of TAURUS air-launched cruise missiles to Ukraine. Despite the fact that Chancellor Olaf Scholz is actively “resisting” the transfer of the above-mentioned ammunition to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, we remember everything very well history with “Leopards”, which, after a similar “reluctance” of the head of the Federal Republic of Germany, appeared en masse in the zone where Russia was conducting the Northeast Military District.

Meanwhile, special interest in the Taurus arose after the scandalous leak of a conversation between German officers, where the attack on the Crimean Bridge with these cruise missiles was discussed. It is probably for this purpose that Kyiv is so actively asking Germany for these missiles.
Actually, this is not surprising, given the characteristics of the ammunition.



It's worth starting with the fact that Taurus is a joint Swedish-German development. At the same time, it is in service only with the armies of Germany and Spain.

The rocket has several modifications. But if we talk about probable deliveries to Ukraine and the reasoning of German officers about the attack on the Crimean Bridge, then, obviously, we are talking about TAURUS KEPD 350.

The number 350 in the name indicates the range of destruction of targets. However, according to some reports, the Germans managed to increase it to 500 km.

The rocket is propelled by a Williams International P8300-15 turbojet with a thrust of 6,67 kN. Typically, the output channels of the two air intakes are “curved” in such a way as to shield the engine turbine from detection by ground-based radars.

TAURUS is equipped with a combined satellite and inertial guidance system. At the same time, the TRN navigation system allows you to guide ammunition over difficult terrain, and the IBN subsystem allows you to adjust it based on digital map data.

However, the most remarkable thing about the German rocket is its MEPHISTO warhead, which weighs 481 kg.
Moreover, 81 of them are cumulative, and the remaining 400 are high-explosive charges.

It all works as follows. A laser range finder located in the nose of the missile determines the optimal distance for detonating the cumulative part and maximum impact on the target. Next comes the detonation of a high-explosive charge.

Typically, the shape of the latter is optimized for punching concrete and heavy rocks. At the same time, the PIMPF system with elements of artificial intelligence, which is equipped with the missile warhead, can be programmed for underground or air detonation.

Actually, this is why the TAURUS KEPD 350 is called the “bridge killer.” This also explains the reasoning of the German officers, as well as the frantic desire of the Kyiv authorities to get their hands on ammunition. Especially against the backdrop of the upcoming deliveries of F-16 fighters, which could become Taurus carriers.

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. YOU
    +1
    31 March 2024 21: 14
    Perhaps a good thing, and even very dangerous. This means that measures must be taken in advance for detection and destruction. The most effective way to destroy it all is in territory 404.
    1. +10
      31 March 2024 21: 37
      Quote: YOU
      Perhaps a good thing, and even very dangerous.

      Here you can do without “even”
      Quote: YOU
      The most effective way to destroy it all is in territory 404.

      It would be more effective if they rushed either in Germany itself or in Poland, in the logistics center where all the weapons coming to Ukraine are accumulated
      1. 0
        31 March 2024 22: 58
        It would be more effective if they rushed either in Germany itself or in Poland

        I have a hard time imagining how this can be done without starting World War III... Any strike by our missiles on storage sites in Poland or Germany will be regarded as an attack on them, which falls under Article 5 of NATO... And what next... ?? ? Are we sitting and waiting for a retaliatory strike or are we turning old Europe into ruins...??? It’s either or - I personally don’t see any other option...
        1. -2
          April 1 2024 00: 59
          And what about the next nuclear weapons that will be handed over to Ukraine? It's time to warn Germany - if we see missiles in Ukraine, then nuclear weapons and Germany minus
        2. 0
          April 1 2024 06: 27
          Quote: Lev_Russia
          I have a hard time imagining how this can be done without starting World War III...

          “Accidents” also happen, like at one time at the arsenal in Bulgaria... And how long has the Third World War been going on?
      2. -1
        31 March 2024 23: 15
        Quote: svp67
        It would be more effective if they rushed either in Germany itself or in Poland, in the logistics center where all the weapons coming to Ukraine are accumulated

        No one will attack the territory of NATO countries. It would be possible to quickly destroy their planes and trains with weapons in territory 404 - but they are afraid even of this, since today’s Russia cannot compete with NATO countries in conventional weapons, and somehow they do not want nuclear weapons. All that remains is the liquidation of all the highest bodies of the Pig Reich government, and the remnants will squabble or run away, but someone forbade this. But this could save millions of lives and a bunch of Russian resources and facilities. Then you still have to, but it will be too late.
        1. -2
          April 1 2024 00: 47
          Quote: running man
          No one will attack the territory of NATO countries.
          so if, figuratively speaking - "religion doesn't allow it" (!), then there is no need to scratch your tongue OUT LOUD (!), to the leadership of the country on behalf of its citizens!!! Yes ...
          Let them look carefully at one of the characters in the film "Route 60" (worthy of respect !!), whose motto was:
          - "say what you think,
          and think about what you’re saying!!”
          ,
          ...
          otherwise, they turn themselves and their own people into balabols / ridicule / windbags ...
          with red lines...
          ...
          and here one large salvo, for example, at the Ramstein base, after the first warning
          , at the time of the transfer of weapons to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, meant for EVERYONE (!), not just Europe:
          ..as in Butusov’s song (“Nautilus Pompilus") ...

          - Ivan Chelovekov, was a simple man, and just looked at the light,
          и “Yes” it was, the real “Yes”, and “No”, the real “No”.
          Yes
          1. 0
            April 1 2024 03: 14
            - “Say what you think, and think what you say!!”
            Yes, that's what I did. laughing And you? Were you too lazy to write all this nonsense?
        2. 0
          April 1 2024 06: 30
          Quote: running man
          No one will attack the territory of NATO countries.
          Yeah, and no one will destroy Nord Streams, it’s “shooting yourself in the foot”.... ))))). In Bulgaria, an arsenal where weapons were stored to be sent to Ukraine was destroyed “by accident”... It helped for a while
      3. -3
        April 1 2024 00: 34
        Quote: svp67
        It would be more effective if they rushed either in Germany itself or in Poland, in the logistics center where all the weapons coming to Ukraine are accumulated
        Yes
        ..
        it’s “Yes” (!) .., but that’s the trouble (!), ..
        that for the purposes of our SVO,
        dont clear: "WHAT?!", .. "who?!", "WHEN?!" ...
        and in the interests, - "For whom ?!" ...
        [/B]
        what request


        Quote: Lev_Russia
        I have a hard time imagining how this can be done without starting World War III... Any strike by our missiles on storage sites in Poland or Germany will be regarded as an attack on them, which falls under Article 5 of NATO... And what next... ?? ? Are we sitting and waiting for a retaliatory strike or are we turning old Europe into ruins...??? It’s either or - I personally don’t see any other option...
        recourse

        [b]even Leo couldn’t understand?!!
        there is a WAR going on, or it doesn't work ..?!!
        and WHO are the enemies, where to look for them?!!
        She gives us profit or brings death..?!!

        ... winked request

        please forgive the epigram[i][/i] ... hi
    2. +2
      31 March 2024 22: 33
      What are you talking about? It is much more effective to destroy them outside German territory. Then it will be difficult for other types of weapons to appear in territory 404.
      1. -1
        April 1 2024 00: 56
        Quote: mongol9999
        ..It is much more effective to destroy them outside German territory. Then it will be difficult for other types of weapons to appear in territory 404
        hi
        most likely will NOT be supplied AT ALL..!!! Yes
        and the fratricidal war will end quickly (!).
        For "Demons" themselves[i] [/ i] will leave our long-suffering land!!! left without support and funding... Yes
        But now there are a LOT of them here, and they interfere with the formation of adequate public opinion (!)... wink
    3. +1
      31 March 2024 23: 04
      -At the same time, 81 of them are cumulative, and the remaining 400 are high-explosive charges.
      The cumulative one undermines the “obstacle” - the road surface, and the high explosive one is the MAIN blow to the bridge support.
      This is the threat of the “German”. And the remaining characteristics are almost identical to the French and British products - an integrated guidance system, almost sonic speed, flight altitude of up to 50 m.
  2. +2
    31 March 2024 22: 03
    This missile is not currently available in Ukraine, because it was not possible to “cross” it with Soviet-made carriers. F-16s will appear, and German cruise missiles will appear.
    1. +1
      31 March 2024 22: 55
      Quote: belost79
      F-16s will appear, and German cruise missiles will appear.

      The German "Taurus" is not adapted to the F-16!!!
      If the Germans hand over the Taurus KEPD 350 to Ukraine, nothing good will come of it. One can only hope that Kiev has a problem with carriers, although this option is simply perfectly corrected by attracting “vacationers” from among veterans who can fly the same Tornado. All in all, not a very pleasant arrangement.
      Adaptation to SU 24 or SU27 is possible. How many are left?
      1. 0
        April 1 2024 11: 58
        Yes, by F-16 I mean Western-developed fighters. It would be possible to adapt to the Soviet ones, but apparently their number is minimal, the game is not worth the candle.
  3. +5
    31 March 2024 22: 43
    Quote: svp67
    It would be more effective if they rushed either in Germany itself

    This is the second year I’ve been writing that sabotage is needed on the territory of filthy countries. Massive, endless terror of their military industry. I'm probably writing nonsense...
    1. +1
      31 March 2024 23: 08
      Well, about the same “nonsense” as the destruction of ukrov bridges on the Dnieper.
      Or the breakdown of their power supply system during the coldest time of the year.
      Or the destruction of locomotives, locomotive depots and railway traction substations.
      You can’t voice this, it’s not humane...
  4. +3
    31 March 2024 22: 55
    Compared to Scalp and Storm Shadow, Taurus is like a Mercedes C Class and Renault Logan. Very serious missile defense and difficult for air defense. And its ability to determine the depth of the soil, sand, concrete and explode where necessary allows one missile to complete the mission 100%. For example, Chimars for similar purposes are used several at a time, 3-5 and even Scalps 2-3. Since individually they cannot dismantle obstacles in the form of walls, ceilings, and soil in such a way as to cause detonation of the main warhead at the optimal depth. Who remembers the recording of the conversation between Luftwafe officers, where they also discussed the required number of Taurus so as not only to damage the Bridge, as was already the case, but to actually make it unusable for months and agreed on a figure of 20-30, since the bridge is many kilometers away length and consists of hundreds of supports. But 20-30 damaged or destroyed supports in certain places will not allow for quick subjugation. What is dangerous about the Taurus for the bridge is its 80 kg cumulative warhead, which allows it to be inserted into the thickness of the foundation of the support under water as deeply as possible and the already damaged foundation of the support becomes a problem, and not an undermined span, as was the case with the truck. The Taurus, if the Germans delivered it today, would of course become a problem and most likely everyone would find a target. But since supplies, as always, will be limited to a couple of dozen, then given the entire volume of the war, Taurus will be a nuisance, but not a prodigy. Now, if a couple of thousand of them are dumped tomorrow, then 1000+ hit tactical points of the Russian troops 500 km from the front in a short time will cause an irreparable effect to the Russian group. I have written many times that against modern missile systems, which usually fly several meters above the ground, have a greatly reduced signature for radars, ground-based air defenses are very weak. Long-rangers do not see them, and even if the radar were thrown up like a cap to see them, the seeker of the missile defense system would not be able to see it against the background of the ground. Only the last frontiers remain, when the missile is seen too late, when it accelerates uphill, as we see in practice, Armor, Tors, and Machine guns are different. So, if now they suddenly decide to triple or tenfold the supply of Scalps and give them Taurus, then without air patrols, preferably aircraft with radars that can see the Kyrgyz Republic on the march, it will be impossible to fight back. The F-16 with an AFAR radar (since only the AFAR sees far and clearly objects several meters above the ground) is just a workhorse in the role of air defense/missile defense in all countries where it is used. Nothing is easier for an F-16 pilot than, after detecting a missile launcher on the march, to position itself behind it and fire a salvo from the cannon. In my opinion, the Black Sea Fleet should also have its own Su-35 units with such radars and ammunition for tracking missiles, anti-ship missiles, ground and surface drones, etc., at approaches of 100-200 km. But they don't even talk about it.
    1. 0
      April 1 2024 04: 12
      From the news - Germany has stopped producing Taurus.
      1. +1
        April 15 2024 21: 00
        Germany produces 3 mio cars per year. And other machines worth about a trillion € per year are exported only. The Taurus is certainly not a car, but arranging mass production of Taurus in the shortest possible time is not a problem at all for Germany, especially for the EU, if the need arises. All these things, such as deliveries and production, are decided from a purely peaceful, civilian structure, or structures, far from war. Officials, in short, are military-industrial complex concerns waiting for budgets, etc., etc. There are also politicians who have elections, electorates, political reasons, etc., etc. In fact, Ukraine could be overwhelmed with weapons, creating an advantage over the Russian Armed Forces without much weakening for itself. A good example is the Patriot air defense system, of which there are hundreds and thousands, but we steal them with a pipette.
  5. +1
    April 1 2024 01: 02
    If you get a yao, use it, otherwise sooner or later the enemy will use it.
  6. 0
    April 1 2024 04: 28
    At the same time, it is in service only with the armies of Germany and Spain.

    It is in service with South Korea. In 2013, a contract was signed for 170 missiles, and they were delivered from 2016. Each missile cost $1,8 million. In 2018, a contract was signed for the supply of another 90 missiles.
    The number 350 in the name indicates the range of destruction of targets. However, according to some reports, the Germans managed to increase it to 500 km.

    Back in the 2013 delivery to South Korea, the range was indicated as 500 km.
    The Taurus is carried by the F-15K.
  7. 0
    April 1 2024 17: 58
    Not a bad kayak, but it seems that the price for this object is inflated beyond all measure.