The Rise and Fall of the Kingdom of Kongo

20
The Rise and Fall of the Kingdom of Kongo

Between the Congo River and the Atlantic Ocean lies the Kingdom of Kongo. It dominated Central Africa for several centuries thanks to its political system and economy. Let's take a look at the exciting history Congo

How did Congo come about?


The kingdom appeared at the end of the 14th century. Before this, there were several weak kingdoms here.



The ancestor of the kingdom is considered to be the kingdom of Vungu, which was located in the north of the Congo River. Vungu expanded and entered into an alliance with Mpemba, another state. Over the years, both kingdoms expanded under a single ruler.

Over time, thanks to alliances and conquests, the territory of the state expanded, and the entire region ended up under one name and one king. The kingdom of Kongo appeared with its capital Mbanza.

Congo began the process of expanding its territory through military conquest. This expansion reached its peak in the 240th and XNUMXth centuries, when the kingdom controlled XNUMX km of the Atlantic coastline.

Flag of the Congo in the 17th century
Flag of the Congo in the 17th century

Slave trade


With a population of more than 2 million, the kingdom faces the daunting task of feeding its citizens. The territory of the Congo was famous for ivory, copper, salt, and cattle were bred here. The kingdom traded these resources and stayed afloat.

The expansion of the Congo was also caused by underground human trafficking. They looked for them or after various wars and clashes they took prisoners and sold them all to the Europeans. The slave trade is a source of wealth and power. The kingdom had permanent markets in different cities. Each of them worked on certain days of the week, where slaves were sold, often brought from the northern coast of the Congo River.

Slaves were paid in local currency, Nzimbu shells. They were originally brought from the coastal city of Luanda. At first they measured the approximate cost of goods, and only then they began to use them as money for payment. You could buy anything with shells, and they were stored in special pots with a capacity of 40, 100, 250, 400 and 500 pieces.

A chicken cost about 100 shells, and a goat about 2 shells. People were the most expensive: the price of a slave was about 000 shells, and a slave - 20 shells. Oh, and once upon a time in childhood, leaves were a bargaining chip for us. I think my parents would be happy if I could buy a frozen chicken for 000 leaves.

Kings of the Congo


The kingdom was ruled by Nkani, as the king was called there. The state was divided into regions, each of which was governed by a governor appointed by the Nkani. Under the authority of the governor were local officials who collected tribute. In general, it is somewhat reminiscent of our current administrative system.

Taxes were paid not in shells, but in ivory, millet, palm wine and animal skins, which were collected from the chiefs and taken to the capital for the king. They took it once a year, and it was a special ceremony where the most powerful people of the Congo gathered, ate, got drunk and praised the king.

The tribute system was a two-way street. From local officials - gifts, from the king - favor (military protection and pleasant gifts: luxurious clothes, gourmet food). Of course, this did not reach those who actually paid taxes. Everything remained with the officials. The payment of tribute was believed to be a “divine favor,” since the king was supposedly appointed by the gods, had a direct connection with the spirit world, and was considered a guardian who protected the people from adversity. But this protection only works for those who pay taxes.

The government also had about 12 elders - advisers to the king. They were chosen from the most influential families. The key positions in the government were occupied, if translated into modern language, by the chief tax inspector and his staff, the head of justice, who headed something like a police force, and an official who managed something like a post office. The king also had an army, which consisted of slaves and numbered from 16 to 000 people in the 20th century. There were also free people (mostly artisans and farmers) and slaves, prisoners of war and debtors.

European influence


The first clashes with European countries in Africa were accompanied by violence, because the Europeans wanted to enslave the population, profit from it, and also gain land. At the end of the 15th century, when the Portuguese colonized several islands near the Congo, the Congolese came into contact with them. Portugal was one of the players in the slave trade, so it was beneficial for it to be friends with the Congo, which supplied Europeans with slaves.

Portuguese audience with the King of Congo
Portuguese audience with the King of Congo

From the Congolese - slaves, from the Portuguese - luxury goods (from mirrors to cotton and silk). Fearing that such luxury would lead to uprisings, the king strictly controlled its consumption and allowed only aristocrats to use it.

Missionaries arrived with the traders, and some of the kings of the Congo gladly accepted Christianity. The first to do this was Afonso I, king from 1506 to 1543. Catholicism is not only a faith. He was associated with flamboyant ceremonies and wealthy Europeans. Thanks to this, royal authority increased in the eyes of the people. After Afonso's conversion, Catholicism became official and the capital was renamed São Salvador, reflecting Portuguese influence. Afterwards, Afonso founded something like Congolese Catholicism, building churches from taxes and royal assets.

Afonso 1
Afonso I

People are attached to their traditions and culture, faith, so it is quite difficult to convert them to Catholicism. Afonso, in order to avoid drastic changes, created his own version of Christianity, and European missionaries helped him. In the Congo, Catholic teachings and traditions were combined with local ones. In the Congo, Christianity equaled wealth, so only the elite were encouraged to convert. This gave the aristocrats another way to increase class inequality.

In addition to religion and wealth, technical knowledge came to the Congo. They also brought in corn and tobacco. Of course, Portugal did not do this out of nobility. The Europeans wanted to Westernize the kingdom so that it would be easier to trade with it and use it as a starting point for the colonization of the mainland.

It is logical that this relationship was ordered to live long. The Portuguese were not particularly adept at hiding their true motives, and conflicts began due to their interference. The kings of the Congo were happy to cooperate with Portugal as long as it was useful. The situation turned sour when the Portuguese killed the king, staged raids, and stole slaves. At the same time, Portugal wanted to seize the copper mines, establish its own laws and completely convert everyone to Catholicism.

If the Congo could build warships, they would be able to dislodge the Portuguese and trade directly with Europe. Portugal did not trust Congo, and neither did she. The Portuguese realized that the kingdom was seeking to destroy them, and the kings realized that Portuguese influence was undermining their authority.

Sunset Congo


From the middle of the 16th century, affairs of the Congo quickly went downhill. The Portuguese, tired of kings who protected their interests, went south. Later this confrontation led to military conflicts.

Without Portugal's money, the kings began to have problems. The upper classes were accustomed to luxury, and the lower classes were tired of the high taxes they paid to please the tastes of the elite. The king's power was falling, and the governors were turning away from him. Why would they remain loyal to the king and pay tribute if they could cooperate directly with European traders, who were only increasing every year? Even though the Portuguese went south, the Spaniards and Dutch arrived, with whom trade was no worse.

Things changed in the kingdom in the mid-16th century when a group of warriors attacked from the south and began to take over. Instead of resisting, tired, dissatisfied and over-taxed, the Congolese rebelled and sided with the invaders. The royal family fled to the island, thanks to which they remained alive.

Now the Congo was torn apart by civil wars between various factions that wanted power. The kingdom fell into decay, and its neighbors became interested. Several interventions led to the complete sack of the capital in 1678.

By the beginning of the 18th century, the kingdom had almost disintegrated, and the region was divided among themselves by traders who formed alliances. The kings still remained, but they had no real power, and the Congo was in real chaos for a couple of centuries.

Only at the beginning of the 1960th century were the Portuguese able to include this state as part of their colony of Angola, and in XNUMX the Congo gained independence.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    29 March 2024 04: 55
    The ancestor of the kingdom is considered to be the kingdom of Vungu, which was located in the north of the Congo River. Vungu expanded entered into an alliance with Mpemba, another state. Over the years, both kingdoms expanded under a single ruler.

    Over time, thanks to alliances and conquests, the territory of the state expanded, and the entire region ended up under one name and one king. The kingdom of Kongo appeared with its capital Mbanza.

    Congo began the process of [b]expansion[/b] of territory through military conquest. This extension reached its peak in the 240th–XNUMXth centuries, when the kingdom controlled XNUMX km of the Atlantic coast.

    For ten paragraphs, 4 words “will expand” is not a lot. Gogol must be rolling over in his grave. Eh, but we thought rich and powerful...
    Good day to everyone, success and prosperity!
    1. +2
      29 March 2024 09: 16
      Yes, Pushkin would have turned over here too. There are enough errors in such a small comment:

      Indecent - together;
      Probably - there are commas on both sides;
      There is no need for a comma before "4 words".

      I know that my comment will be downvoted, because everywhere here they often take the side of the readers) but oh well. Look after yourself first, and then correct others)
      1. +6
        29 March 2024 14: 43
        Don't confuse comments with text. You have time to proofread and correct, and the regularity of the articles hints that you are getting paid for them.
        And if this is work, at least try to do it well.
        1. -6
          29 March 2024 17: 05
          Wait. It turns out that you can make mistakes in the comments?) Personally, you won’t find them anywhere with me. Yes, there may be typos. But not mistakes. Because I believe that a person should write and speak competently in his native language. At school, like many others, I was taught to write correctly. But for some reason many of those who studied in Soviet times are not.
          1. +1
            30 March 2024 08: 19
            Quote: LOKOmen93
            Because I believe that a person should write correctly

            I have to disappoint you. As a writer you are extremely helpless. And the repetitions that my colleague pointed out are in this sense a very characteristic marker.
            But that's not so bad. After all, not everyone can be Dostoevsky. As a historian, you are also far from Tarle, but at the same time you are painfully proud and cannot stand criticism.
            Quote: LOKOmen93
            But not mistakes.

            Oh really. Who wrote this?
            Between the Congo River and the Atlantic Ocean located kingdom of Kongo.

            Right now located? In present time?
            1. Msi
              +3
              30 March 2024 17: 21
              As a writer you are extremely helpless

              You are being harsh with the author...
              A chaotic article, of course, and not very informative.
      2. -2
        30 March 2024 13: 12
        Why will they be downvoted? On the contrary, plus
      3. +1
        30 March 2024 18: 08
        Quote: LOKOmen93
        . Look after yourself first, and then correct others)
        In the last paragraph of the article not precision...
        Congo with its capital Kinshasa (aka Belgian Congo capital Boma) became independent 30 June 1960
        Angola (a colony of Portugal) became independent November 11, 1975
        hi
  2. +1
    29 March 2024 05: 56
    Northern coast of the Congo? How is that? The right and left banks were cancelled? The upper reaches, the lower reaches too? This is now probably the western and eastern banks. Let’s not judge strictly, the author used Congolese sources, translated, got tired.
    1. -2
      30 March 2024 13: 13
      Well, the Jordan has a west bank...
      1. +2
        30 March 2024 18: 36
        There is, because like the Jordan, it flows from North to South.. And look at the map where the Congo originates and where it flows and determine the eastern and western banks. Roughly speaking, it flows from east to west, well, this is very rough.
        1. -2
          30 March 2024 19: 23
          Why doesn't Congo have rights to the northern shore? What kind of discrimination? Smells like Zionism, my friend.
  3. +5
    29 March 2024 08: 20
    It brought me to tears, because I remembered my childhood, a history textbook for the 4th grade. Approximately the same level of presentation of the material.
    1. +5
      29 March 2024 10: 26
      I really liked the 4th grade textbook called Stories on the History of the USSR, the presentation there is better than in the article.
  4. +3
    29 March 2024 08: 34
    An instructive story about what friendship with Western partners leads to in three acts:
    1. Act one "African Mordor":
    With a population of more than 2 million, the kingdom faces the daunting task of feeding its citizens. The territory of the Congo was famous for ivory, copper, salt, and cattle were bred here. The kingdom traded these resources and stayed afloat.

    2. Act two “Propaganda of Western values”:
    Missionaries arrived with the traders, and some of the kings of the Congo gladly accepted Christianity. The first to do this was Afonso I, king from 1506 to 1543. Catholicism is not only a faith. He was associated with flamboyant ceremonies and wealthy Europeans.

    3. Act three “Triumph of Democracy”:
    The numerous wars that the Portuguese imposed on the Congo during the 17th century, united with the Yaga, led the kingdom to final decline and disintegration into warring destinies.
    Following the defeat of the Congolese king António I by the Portuguese army at the Battle of Ambuila, the Congo from 1665 to 1709 was engulfed in civil war between the rival Quimpanzu and Kinlaza houses and numerous smaller groups. By the end of the war, the Kongo capital was destroyed in 1678 and many Bakongo were sold into slavery.

    hi
  5. +2
    29 March 2024 10: 22
    I liked the Wiki article about the Kingdom of Kongo better than this one.
  6. +4
    29 March 2024 18: 18
    Dear author! The primitive content of an article in the style of “Stories from history for preschoolers, downers and dummies” is not very interesting reading. But some of your articles are quite interesting. So you can? Value your audience.
  7. +4
    30 March 2024 00: 02
    Missionaries arrived with the traders, and some of the kings of the Congo gladly accepted Christianity. The first to do this was Afonso I, king from 1506 to 1543.

    The first officially Christian monarch of Equatorial Africa was the ruler of the medieval Kingdom of Kongo, Nzinga Nkuvu (Joan Kongo I). Ruled between 1470 and 1509.
    The author should write to Murzilka and not to adult publications.
  8. +5
    30 March 2024 00: 39
    The author of the article could provide at least a few maps Kingdom of Kongo...
    Ideally, show a map of the cor. Congo at every stage of the development of the State, from dawn to dusk...
    Below are some core cards. Congo and one general map of Africa before colonial times.
    hi
  9. 0
    30 March 2024 04: 46
    And why is there no mention of English influence on the slave trade? But under the British, the flow of slaves to America increased exponentially compared to the time of Portuguese rule.