Isabella of Castile, Torquemada and the “Black Spanish Legend”

47
Isabella of Castile, Torquemada and the “Black Spanish Legend”
Isabella la Catolica, monument in Medina del Campo


It's time to continue the story about Isabella I of Castile and talk about her activities as Queen of Castile and Leon (from 1474), Aragon, Valencia and Sicily, Countess of Barcelona (from 1479). And we will have to start with stories establishment of the Tribunal of the Holy Office of the Inquisition.



Founding of the Inquisition in Castile and Leon



Coat of arms of the Spanish Inquisition


One of the banners of the Spanish Inquisition, 17th century

On the walls of Spanish palaces you can often see three letters “I” woven into an ornament - they mean: Isabella, Spain, Inquisition.

Where did it all start?

In 1477, the Sicilian inquisitor Philippe de Barberis came to Isabella and Ferdinand with a request to confirm the privilege of appropriating a third of the property of convicted heretics (Sicily at that time was dependent on the kingdom of Aragon). It was de Barberis who advised the restoration of the inquisitorial courts in Aragon and the establishment of them in Castile and Leon.

This proposal was supported by the papal nuncio Nicolo Franco. It turned out that he was also approved by local church hierarchs who wanted to investigate the degree of sincerity of the conversion of the Jews and Moors. But the decisive one was the opinion of Torquemada, who stated that most conversos retain the faith of their ancestors and only pretend to be “good Christians.”


Monumento a Isabel la Catolica, Madrid: Isabella, Ferdinad and Torquemada

Isabella officially turned to Pope Sixtus IV with a request for permission to found her own Inquisition in Castile.


Pope Sixtus IV in the portrait of Jos van Ghent and Pedro Berruguete; he went down in history as the commissioner of the painting of the Vatican Chapel (now known to everyone as the Sistine Chapel)

On November 1, 1478, this pontiff issued the bull Sincerae devotionis, in which the Catholic kings were allowed to establish their own inquisitorial body, the members of which were appointed by the Catholic kings. These were to be "archbishops and bishops or other ecclesiastical dignitaries, renowned for their wisdom and virtue... not less than forty years of age and of impeccable conduct, masters or bachelors of divinity, doctors or licentiates of canon law."

Isabella and Ferdinand had the right to appoint and dismiss inquisitors, which the Vatican did not like much later, but it was too late. When, at the beginning of 1482, the same Sixtus IV himself appointed 7 Dominican inquisitors to Castile, he received a cold answer:

“Trust us to take care of this matter.”

The first inquisition fires were lit on January 6, 1481, when six people were executed, and a total of 298 that year. Such executions became known as “auto da fé” - literally translated from Portuguese - “act of faith.” . Initially, this was not the name for the execution itself, but for the solemn ceremony of announcing the verdicts of the Inquisition court.


Procession of priests in front of the autodaf, engraving

Residents of the cities were notified in advance about the upcoming burning of heretics, here is the text of one of these posters:

“The inhabitants of the city of Madrid are hereby informed that the sacred court of the Inquisition of the city and kingdom of Toledo will solemnly perform a general auto-da-fé on Sunday, June 30th of this year, and that all those who, in one way or another, will take part in the commission or will be present at the said auto-da-fé, will benefit from all the spiritual graces that the Roman high priest has at his disposal.”

The Spanish historian Jean Seville wrote that the auto-da-fé was

“a great religious and popular holiday, which included prayer, mass, sermon, demonstration of the faith of those gathered, announcement of sentences, expression of repentance of those sentenced.”

“Book auto-da-fés” were also held—the burning of works “infected with the errors of Judaism or imbued with witchcraft, magic, sorcery and other superstitions.”

Juan Antonio Llorente, who at the end of the 18th century was the secretary of the Tribunal of the Inquisition in Madrid, argues that, as a rule, these were “excesses on the ground”, where overzealous inquisitors:

“Not only did they not conform to either the papal bull or the royal decrees, they even neglected the appeal to the diocesan bishop. The Council of the Inquisition decided everything on its own, following the assessments of theologians called qualifiers, who, in general, were biased people. "

It is curious that the heroes of Cervantes’ famous novel “Don Quixote” also staged such an amateur “auto-da-fe” (quote from the first volume, written in 1605):

“The priest and the barber the next morning... asked his niece for the key to the room in which the books were kept, which were the source of all her uncle’s troubles.
The young girl happily complied with their request, took out the key to the library and unlocked it.
The housekeeper also entered there after the visitors, but suddenly spat fiercely and immediately ran back. A minute later she returned with a bowl filled with water and said to the priest:
“Here, my father, sprinkle this entire room with holy water.” Perhaps, then the unclean wizards who have hidden themselves in the books will not do us any harm when we begin to destroy them.
The priest fulfilled her request, and then asked the barber to give him books one by one to look through, so as not to burn useful books along with harmful ones.
There were more than a hundred books, large and small, and all in good bindings.
“Please don’t spare any of them,” said the niece. “They’re all no good.” In my opinion, they should be thrown out of the window into the yard without any disassembly and a good fire should be made of them there. This will be the best.
The housekeeper was of the same opinion; but the priest wanted to know at least the names of the books, and therefore insisted on their revision.”

The Supreme Tribunal of the Holy Inquisition in Castile (Supremo Tribunal de la Santa Inquisition) was established on August 2, 1483, it was ruled by the General (Grand, Supreme) Inquisitor of the Kingdom of Castile, who became Tommaso Torquemada.

On October 14 of the same year, Aragon was transferred to his jurisdiction, and then (in 1486) Catalonia and Valencia. The property of the convicted went in equal parts to the royal treasury, the Pope and those conducting the investigation - as a result, the inquisitors turned out to be financially interested in convicting as many suspects as possible.

There were even cases of posthumous condemnation of rich people who could no longer refute the accusations or defend their honor: the deceased rich man was declared a heretic, the corpse was torn out of the grave and burned, his property was confiscated. The heirs were glad if they were not accused of aiding and abetting.

As a result, it was Torquemada, as Inquisitor General of the kingdom, who financed many state projects.

But why did Isabella and Ferdinand decide to persecute their subjects religiously?

Usually, within the framework of the notorious “black legend,” all explanations come down to “obscurantism,” obscurantism and religious intolerance, supposedly characteristic not only of the Catholic kings and Torquemada, but also of all their subjects. IN first article An engraving depicting a “typical Spaniard” has already been cited:


Check out another one:


In fact, as already noted in first article, it was about the actual creation of a new state, which is now known to everyone as Spain. And it was decided to unite disparate territories on the basis of the principle “One faith, one law, one king.”

Charles IX acted in exactly the same way in France, under whom, after the events of St. Bartholomew’s Night, about 200 thousand Huguenots fled from the country. And Louis XIV, who published the Edict of Fontainebleau on October 18, 1685, according to which the Protestant religion was completely prohibited, pastors were expelled abroad, the property of Huguenot emigrants was subject to confiscation - after this, more than 200 thousand people left the country in a few weeks.

French historian and anthropologist Christian Duverge wrote:

“Ferdinand and Isabella were challenged: they had to unite the country, fragmented by the contradictory course of history and medieval political organization. Isabella made a simple decision: religion will become the cement of Spain’s unity. ”

The Spanish historian Jean Sevilla wrote about Torquemada and the persecution of the Jews:

“Torquemada is not a product of Catholicism: it is the fruit of national history... The expulsion of the Jews - no matter how shocking it may seem to us - did not arise from racist logic: it was an act that was aimed at completing the religious unification of Spain... Catholic kings acted like all European kings rulers of that time, based on the principle: “One faith, one law, one king.”

And here is what he says about the “Muslim problem”:

“During the Reconquista, Muslims remained on Christian territory. There were 30 thousand of them in Aragon, 50 thousand in the kingdom of Valencia (it depended on the Aragonese crown), 25 thousand in Castile. In 1492, the fall of Granada increased to 200 thousand the number of Moors who found themselves under the jurisdiction of Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand... in order to achieve the spiritual unity of Spain, with the support of the Church, the Catholic kings pursued a policy of conversion...
Just as it failed with the Jews, the policy of assimilation through mass conversion to Christianity failed with the Muslims. It is impossible to rape the mind: no one will renounce their culture and their faith under duress. This is a great lesson.
However, to judge only Christian Spain for this is to make a big mistake. In that era, not a single Muslim country was tolerant of Christians on its territory. The situation is exactly the same in the 21st century in a large number of Muslim countries.”

There was cruelty and there were abuses. But Lion Feuchtwanger, who remained objective, wrote about that time:

"The Spaniards
Inquisition to lose
They didn’t want at all, for
She gave them God...
And they are with stubborn faith
Stupidly, earnestly, submissively
They held on to her the same way
As for your monarch."

Many have probably heard the biting phrase of the Mexican writer Carlos Fuentes (his years of life were 1928–2012):

"Spain banished sensuality from the Moors and intellect from the Jews."

But this is just his personal (and unsubstantiated) opinion.

The reign of the Catholic kings and their successors, on the contrary, became the Golden Age of Spain, the beginning of which is counted from the end of the Reconquista and the discovery of America (1492), and it ended in the period between the end of the Thirty Years' War (1648) and the beginning of the War of the Spanish Succession (1700).

At this time, in Spain, among others, lived and worked not only Cervantes and Lope de Vega, but also Pedro Calderon de la Barca, Hernando de Acuña, Baltasar Gracian, Francisco de Queveda, and Guillen de Castro, recognized as classics of Spanish literature. Not only Velazquez, El Greco and Murillo, but also Luis de Morales, José de Ribera, Francisco Pacheco, Antonio Palamino, José Antolines, Alonso Cano, Juan Martinez Montañans. Francisco de Vitoria laid the foundations of international law. Having heard these names, only an absolutely ignorant person can talk about the decline of Spanish culture.

The most powerful monarchs not only of Europe, but of the whole world were the grandson of Isabella and Ferdinand, Charles I of Castile and Aragon, also the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, and her great-grandson Philip II. It was Charles V who financed the famous expedition of Magellan; the power of this monarch extended to Spain, Portugal, part of Italy, the German principalities of the Holy Roman Empire, the Philippines, and vast territories in America.

The weakening of Spain has nothing to do with the expulsion of the Jews and Moors; it has other reasons.

We are again dealing with the notorious and extremely tenacious “black Spanish legend,” which began to be created in England and the Netherlands only in the 1778th century. This is what some of its creators wrote about the same Torquemada and the Spanish inquisitors. For example, Jean Baptiste Delisle de Sales in XNUMX in the book “Philosophy of Nature”:

"The Dominican, who called himself Torquemada, boasted that he condemned one hundred thousand people and burned six thousand people at the stake: in order to reward this great inquisitor for his zeal, he was made a cardinal."

Antonio Lopez de Fonseca argued in Politics Purified of Liberal Illusions (1838):

“The Tribunal of the Inquisition at Torquemada, during the reign of Ferdinand and Isabella, from 1481 to 1498, exterminated 10 people at the stake; executed the images of 220 people, and sentenced 6 people to galleys and imprisonment.”

Maximilian Schöll writes in 1831:

“Torquemada died in 1498; It was estimated that during the eighteen years of his inquisitorial reign, 8 people were burned, 800 were burned as images or after their death, and 6 suffered the punishment of disgrace, confiscation of property, life imprisonment and dismissal from office.

(In fact, Torquemada was Grand Inquisitor for 15 years).

Friedrich Schiller, History of the Revolt in the Netherlands against Spanish Rule:

“For thirteen to fourteen years, the Spanish Inquisition conducted 100 thousand processes, sentenced 6 thousand heretics to be burned, and converted 50 thousand people to Christianity.”

The above-mentioned Juan Antonio Llorente, secretary of the Inquisition Tribunal in Madrid, gives more modest figures. He reports that under Torquemada, 8 people were burned alive, instead of the other 800 who were convicted in absentia, their straw effigies were burned, 6 people were arrested and tortured.

But British historian Henry Kamen, in his 1997 book “The Spanish Inquisition,” claims that in only 1,9% of the 49 cases he examined, the accused was handed over to secular authorities for execution. In other cases, the defendants either received another punishment (fine, penance, obligation of pilgrimage) or were acquitted. Agree that the figures cited by Kamen are somehow not very impressive.

Nothing beyond the usual cruelty of that era happened in Spain under the Catholic kings. The Spanish inquisitors hunted mainly hypocritically baptized Jews (tornadidos - “shifters”) and Arabs (moriscos, Moriscos, that is, “Moorish”).

In other countries, the main enemies of the church were witches (and only secondarily various heretics). The infamous guide to finding them, “The Hammer of the Witches,” was written not by the Spaniards, but by the Germans Heinrich Institoris and Jacob Sprenger and published in 1487 in the German city of Speyer (Isabella the Catholic was 36 years old at that time).

"The Witches' Hammer" is now called "the most shameful and obscene book in the entire history of Western civilization" and by some - "a manual on sexual psychopathology." A typical quote: “Where there are many women, there are many witches” - and in some villages in Germany there are no women left at all.


"Witches Hammer"


Heinrich Kramer, illustration for “The Witches Hammer”

The record holders for the number of tortures applied to the accused (56 types) were not the Spaniards, but the Germans, who also came up with a number of “innovative” tools, for example, the “Maid of Nuremberg” - an iron cabinet with sharp nails inside.


The Nuremberg maiden

The world record for the simultaneous burning of condemned people belongs to German Protestants from the Saxon city of Quedlinburg, where 1589 people were executed on one day in 133.

Modern historians estimate the total number of victims of witchcraft trials outside Spain to be 150–200 thousand people. The Bishop of Würzburg alone, Philipp-Adolf von Ehrenberg, burned 209 people, including 25 children. Among those sentenced to execution were the most beautiful girl in the city and a student who, to his misfortune, knew too many foreign languages. In Fulda, judge Balthasar Voss burned 700 “witches and sorcerers” and very much regretted that it was not possible to bring this number to 1.

One of the priests of the city of Bonn at the beginning of the 17th century reported to Count Werner von Salm:

“It seems that half the city is involved: professors, students, pastors, canons, vicars and monks have already been arrested and burned... The chancellor and his wife and the wife of his personal secretary have already been captured and executed. On the Nativity of the Most Holy Theotokos, a pupil of the prince-bishop, a nineteen-year-old girl known for her piety and piety, was executed... 3-4 year old children are declared lovers of the devil. Students and boys of noble birth aged 9–14 are burned. In conclusion, I will say that things are in such a terrible state that no one knows who to talk to and cooperate with.”


The witch statue in Herschlitz (North Saxony) is a memorial to the victims of the witch hunts between 1560–1640.

In Calvinist Switzerland, about 1542 “witches” were burned in 500.

In Protestant Sweden in 1669, 86 women and 15 children were sentenced to death for “witchcraft.” Another 56 children were sentenced to caning: 36 were driven through the line of soldiers with rods and then had their hands lashed once a week for a year. 20 others had their hands beaten with rods on three subsequent Sundays. In Swedish churches, prayers of gratitude were offered for a long time on this occasion for the salvation of the country from the devil.

In Norway, under the considered very “progressive” King Christian IV, 2 women were burned in the city of Vardø with a population of about 000 people.


Burning chair at the Burnt Witches Memorial in Vardø, Norway

In Scotland, under James (James) VI Stuart (the son of Mary Stuart, also the English King James I), about 4 thousand women were executed on charges of witchcraft.


Monument of Alice Nutter, one of the women burned under Jacob I in England

In England there was only one lawyer, Matthew Hopkins, in 1645–1646. achieved the execution of 68 “witches”. Already at the end of the 1692th century - in 1693–200. In the small American Puritan town of Salem, about 19 people were arrested on charges of witchcraft. Of these, 1 were hanged, XNUMX was crushed to death with stones, four died in prison, seven were convicted but received a reprieve, one woman, who was kept in prison for a long time without trial, was eventually sold into slavery for debts, one girl went crazy . At the same time, two dogs were also killed as henchmen of the witches. The reason is the unsubstantiated slander of several little girls, who later admitted that they did it “for fun.”

In Spain, this was impossible to imagine - there were clear and understandable rules - by observing them, there was no particular fear of the visit of the inquisitors. Which, moreover, in their actions were limited by the instructions developed by Torquemada, and he believed that it was necessary to fight sin, and not sinners, and demanded that judges “not fall into anger” and “remember mercy.”

In the German principalities, as already written above, there were no rules at all, each bishop tried the accused at his own discretion, and there was no hope for an acquittal.

However, of course, there were abuses in the territories subject to the Catholic kings; no one denies them. The inquisitor of Aragon, Pedro Arbues, especially distinguished himself then, who turned out to be a passionate lover of chess, and, according to legend, organized colorful costume games in which the role of the figures was played by those condemned to execution: the “eaten” heretic was killed by the executioner, the survivors were sent to “purification by fire.”


Wilhelm von Kaulbach. Pedro de Arbuez condemns the family of a heretic to death

Pedro Arbuez went everywhere with a large guard, wore chain mail under his cassock, and a steel helmet under his cap, but on September 15, 1485 he was killed in the church.


Bartolome Esteban Murillo "The Assassination of the Inquisitor Pedro de Arbuez"

In 1661, Pope Alexander VII recognized him as a martyr, and Pius IX canonized him in 1867.

After the death of Arbuez, Isabella became personally concerned about the safety of her teacher and confessor: by her order, Torquemada was now guarded by 200 infantry and 50 horsemen. They say that he was burdened by such a large retinue.

In the last years of his life, Torquemada spent in a monastery and almost did not visit the royal palace. The Catholic kings themselves came to him, Isabella visited him especially often. He died on September 16, 1498 and was buried in the chapel of the monastery of St. Thomas (Thomas).

Edict of granada


On March 31, 1492, the famous El Decreto de la Alhambra (Edicto de Granada) was published, which was no longer about investigating the activities of conversos, but about expelling from the territory of the united kingdoms those Jews who did not want to be baptized.


Edict of Alhambra by Ferdinand and Isabella, March 31, 1492

Jews were ordered to leave Spain before the end of July 1492; they were allowed to take with them

“to take back your property... on the condition that neither gold, nor silver, nor minted coins, nor other items prohibited by the laws of the kingdom (precious stones, pearls) will be taken away.”

It must be said that Torquemada, Isabella and Ferdinand were confident that the vast majority of Jews (among whom there were many high-ranking officials and simply very rich people) would convert to Christianity and remain in the state.

The mass emigration of the Jews was an unpleasant surprise; Isabella and Ferdinand were even going to soften the terms of the Edict of Granada, especially since Isaac ben Yehuda was a royal tax farmer in Castile and a trusted adviser to the Catholic kings, a former treasurer of the King of Portugal, who received nobility and the right to be called Don Abravanel, on behalf of the Jewish The community offered the monarchs 30 thousand ducats “for state needs,” an obligation for all Jews to live in separate quarters from Christians, and even agreement to ban certain professions.

The deal was prevented by Torquemada, who said:

“Judas Iscariot sold his master for thirty pieces of silver. And your Majesties are now ready to sell it for thirty thousand coins. "

Then he threw a crucifix on the table, saying:

"Our crucified Savior is depicted here, for him you will receive several more silver coins."


The appeal of the Jews to Isabella and Ferdinand, the monarchs are ready to listen, but Torquemada is already making a prohibitive gesture.

And here’s what this episode looks like in the painting “The Expulsion of the Jews from Spain” by Emilio Sala y Frances (Prado Museum):


But after the expulsion of the Jews - in 1492, Isabella's husband Ferdinand published a letter to the emigrants, in which he called on them to be baptized and return to their homes.

В first article It has already been said that the expulsion of Jews in Europe was not uncommon and almost commonplace. They were expelled from France in 1080, 1147, 1306, 1394 and 1591, from England - in 1188, 1198, 1290 and 1510, from Hungary - in 1360, from Poland - in 1407.

Europeans were then surprised only by the nature of the deportation in the territory subject to the Catholic kings. Always and everywhere, Jews were expelled on the grounds that they were Jews - that is, on the basis of nationality. They were expelled from the united kingdoms because they were Jews - that is, for reasons of a purely religious nature.

Priests and government officials were sent to the Jewish quarters to persuade the Jews to convert to Christianity and remain in the country, preserving their property and position in society.

As a result, from 50 to 150 thousand Jews chose baptism, the rest left the country and became known as “Sephardim” (from “Sfarad” - Spain).

It is curious that the rabbis then ordered weddings for all children over 12 years old - so that no one would be lonely in a foreign land. Some of the Jews (including the above-mentioned Isaac ben Yehuda) went to Naples, from where they were also expelled for several years - in 1510–1511. Some headed to North Africa, where many were robbed by Arabs and Berbers. Others reached Palestine, where the Safed community appeared.

A large group of Jews emigrated to Portugal, but already in 1498 they were expelled from there, since only on such conditions the daughter of Isabella the Catholic Maria of Aragon agreed to marry King Manuel I.

The luckiest of all were those Jews who accepted the offer of the eighth Ottoman Sultan Bayezid II, who ordered Admiral Kemal Reis to accept the Sephardim on his ships and deliver them to the territory of the empire. These Jews settled in Istanbul, Edirne, Thessaloniki, Izmir, Manisa, Bursa, Gelibol, Amasya and some other cities.


Sultan Bayazid II

A young Sephardi also found himself in Edirne, who, having converted to Islam, took the name Sinan ad-Din Yusuf and entered the ship of Khair ad-Din Barbarossa, the famous pirate who became one of the best admirals of the Ottoman Empire. He soon became widely known as Sinan Pasha, the admiral of a corsair squadron with a crew of up to 6 thousand people, and placed a six-pointed star on his flag.


Sinan Pasha

But he was especially glorified in 1541 by the defense of Algeria from the huge expeditionary army of Charles V (grandson of Isabella the Catholic and son of Juana the Mad), which included the famous Hernan Cortes. At first, the Spanish squadron was pretty battered by a terrible storm, and then Sinan’s subordinates literally threw the Christians into the sea, taking three thousand people prisoner.

At that time, 2 thousand Jews lived in Algeria, who for a long time celebrated this defeat of the Spaniards with a three-day fast, turning into a holiday. And Sinan was appointed commander of the Ottoman fleet Indian Ocean. This position was “inherited” by his son, Sefer Pasha, who in 1560 defeated the Portuguese squadron of Admiral Cristvo Pereira Homen.

Over time, Sephardim also settled in Navarre, Vizcaya, central and northern France, Austria, England and the Netherlands.


Emigration of Jews from Spain, map

The descendants of the Sephardim were the philosopher Boruch Spinoza, the economist David Ricardo, the impressionist artist Camille Pizarro and the British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, who, by the way, once arrogantly declared in the House of Lords:

“When the ancestors of my esteemed opponent were savages on an unknown island, my ancestors were priests in the Temple of Jerusalem.”

Sephardim were invariably at enmity with other Jews who settled in Central and Eastern Europe - Ashkenazim: they considered them (and many still consider them) “second-class Jews.”


Sephardic and Ashkenazi

It is known that in the Sephardic synagogues of Amsterdam and London back in the 18th century, only Sephardim were allowed to sit; Ashkenazim stood, and behind a partition. Marriages between Sephardim and Ashkenazis were also categorically discouraged. And these two groups of Jews spoke different languages: Sephardim - Ladino, Ashkenazi - Yiddish.

By the way, there is another rather large group of Jews who have an even less “prestigious” status - “Mizrahi”, these are immigrants from Asia and Africa of non-Spanish origin - Jews of Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Iran and India.

Currently, between one and a half and two million descendants of those Jews who were expelled by Catholic kings in the 15th century live in the world. In modern Spain, they have the right to obtain citizenship through a simplified procedure: this requires providing either a link to some historical document or a notarized certificate from the leader of a recognized Sephardic Jewish community.

The Moors (Mudejars) who did not want to be baptized were expelled from Castile after the death of Isabella and Torquemada - in 1502. And since then, the Moors who converted to Christianity in Castile began to be called Moriscos (“Moorish”), in Valencia and Catalonia - Saracens, but in Aragon they retained their former name.

We have already noted that Isabella and Ferdinand were concerned about the problems of the unity of the country they created - Spain. Their fears were not unfounded, as the Moorish uprising (Alpujar War) in the former Emirate of Granada in 1568 confirmed. It was suppressed only in 1571.

The final decision on the fate of the Moriscos was made by King Philip III, the great-great-grandson of Isabella I of Castile and the great-grandson of the above-mentioned Mary of Aragon. He signed the edict expelling the Moriscos from the country on April 9, 1609. This document was similar to the Edict of Granada of 1492, but had a significant difference: it was allowed to remove small children from Morisco families, who were handed over to Catholic priests for education.

In the next article we will continue and finish the story about Queen Isabella I of Castile. Let's talk about the conquest of Granada, Columbus's expedition, the last years of the life of the Catholic Queen.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    14 March 2024 05: 20
    Quote: Ryzhov V. A.
    On the walls of Spanish palaces you can often see three letters “I” woven into an ornament - they mean: Isabella, Spain, Inquisition
    Of these words, the letter “I” is only found in Isabella and Inquisition. Spain is spelled Espana (with a tilde on top of the "n"). Or did the author mean the Cyrillic alphabet, which makes up the Spanish alphabet? NB Please do not consider this as nitpicking wink
    1. +4
      14 March 2024 07: 47
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      Of the above words, the letter “I” is only found in Isabella and the Inquisition

      I remember how in elementary school we interpreted the Nazi swastika as four letters. Г, connected together and representing Hitler, Goering, Goebbels and Himmler...
  2. +5
    14 March 2024 05: 50
    Valerie's work is amazing, I'll finish reading it on the subway!!
  3. +5
    14 March 2024 06: 06
    If I'm not confusing anything, the last execution at the stake was in "enlightened" Switzerland, in 1782.
    Just in case, the owner handed over the servant who became pregnant from him to the Inquisition.
    Watch your hands: in “wild, bast” Russia Lomonosov has already died twenty years ago, and in cultish Europe an unfortunate woman is sent to the stake.
    And yes, women in Germany are scary as mortal sin!
    1. +7
      14 March 2024 06: 39
      Quote: Grossvater
      Watch your hands: in “wild, bast” Russia Lomonosov has already died twenty years ago, and in cultish Europe an unfortunate woman is sent to the stake
      You have gone too far into the historical past. There are more recent examples. Follow my hands too: the slave trade in the colonies, Aloizych’s childish showdowns with the Jews in the Third Reich, the white man’s burden in England, or rather in their possessions, the Crowe law in the USA, the South, all strewn with “whites only” signs, apartheid in South Africa, etc. This is quite a normal practice for all “common people” and “human rights fighters” wink
    2. 0
      14 March 2024 20: 55
      ...in “wild, bast” Russia, Lomonosov has already died twenty years ago, and in cultish Europe the unfortunate woman is sent to the stake.

      The trick with the hands is not entirely successful.
      From Anna Ioanovna’s resolution on the case of captain-lieutenant A. Voznitsin and the Jew Borukh Leibov:
      “They themselves, Voznitsyn, in accepting the Jewish faith, and the Jew Borukh Leibov, in turning him into Judaism through his noticeable admonitions, themselves were guilty; and for this purpose, they should not be investigated for anything else, so that this ungodly business would not continue further and such blasphemer Voznitsyn and the convert The Jew Borukh did not dare to seduce others into Judaism: for the sake of such ungodly guilt... both shall be executed by death, burned"

      Russia, 1738 year.
  4. +1
    14 March 2024 06: 41
    Quote: Dutchman Michel
    slave trade in the colonies,

    winked Well... The slave trade was still somewhat earlier than the end of the 18th century, about which I generally wrote. Yes, for accuracy.
    1. +1
      14 March 2024 08: 24
      Quote: Grossvater
      The slave trade was still somewhat earlier than the end of the 18th century
      It ended only in the second half of the 19th century, when the British began to detain slave ships in the Atlantic
      1. +1
        14 March 2024 23: 18
        well, serfs also ended in the mid-19th century
  5. +7
    14 March 2024 07: 29
    a young Sephardi who, having converted to Islam, took the name Sinan ad-Din Yusuf and entered the ship of Khair ad-Din Barbarossa, the famous pirate

    It’s so interesting: Sinan’s family did not want to be baptized, but accepted Islam with great pleasure?
    1. +3
      14 March 2024 08: 48
      Sinan’s family did not want to be baptized, but accepted Islam with great pleasure?

      For the obvious reason - there was no Inquisition in the Ottoman Empire. This means that it was possible to convert to Islam formally, while actually continuing to practice Judaism. In Spain, with Christianity, such behavior was, to put it mildly, fraught...
      1. +2
        14 March 2024 09: 14
        Quote: paul3390
        This means that it was possible to accept Islam formally, while actually continuing to profess Judaism

        Nobody formally accepts Islam! Remember the popular expression: if you accept Islam, you will lose foreskin, and you come out of it - head...
        1. +2
          14 March 2024 09: 45
          Oh, come on! In the absence of centralized church control, who will check this? It’s impossible to count how many of these there are in the Middle East alone. Avon - at least read about the activities of the Druze..
          1. +1
            14 March 2024 15: 59
            Quote: paul3390
            In the absence of centralized church control, who will check this?

            There is an environment, for example, neighbors. Your practices other than Islam will not remain unknown. In a week or a year, you will still be identified...
            1. +1
              14 March 2024 16: 25
              Tell this to the Druze.. Or the Ismailis.. Or the Yezidis.. Or - yes, you can choose for yourself, they have been encrypted there for centuries.. Quite successfully, since they are still alive to this day.
        2. +1
          14 March 2024 17: 14
          Quote: Luminman
          if you convert to Islam, you lose your foreskin,

          And the poor Jews have nothing to lose... request
      2. +1
        14 March 2024 11: 07
        Quote: paul3390
        This means that it was possible to accept Islam formally, while in fact continuing to profess Judaism.
        What for? Traditional Islam is tolerant of Christians and Jews. Unless you save money on taxes
        1. +1
          14 March 2024 11: 46
          Unless you save money on taxes

          Well, you know everything yourself... wink

          There is one more aspect - some very profitable positions among the Ottomans could only be occupied by Muslims.. As in Spain - Christians..
      3. +1
        14 March 2024 23: 44
        Quote: paul3390

        For the obvious reason - there was no Inquisition in the Ottoman Empire. This means that it was possible to convert to Islam formally, while actually continuing to practice Judaism. .

        But it was possible to truly accept it without fear of being dispossessed by the inquisitors.
        And then it turns out - “Madam, we’ve run out of Converse, where can we get money? You can’t attract people of other faiths for heresy.. - Let them be baptized, and then we’ll dispossess them. And if they don’t want to? We’ll kick them out, and leave the money in the country.”
        But something went wrong... I’m exaggerating, of course, but any non-domestic violence has only economic roots.
  6. +3
    14 March 2024 07: 44
    “For thirteen to fourteen years, the Spanish Inquisition conducted 100 thousand trials, sentenced 6 thousand heretics to burning

    It should be noted here that the Inquisition itself did not punish anyone, it simply broke the wand in its hand delivered a verdict heretic. And dirty work on lighting fires and passing sentences persons of worldly origin were already engaged, based on the laws of a particular state...
  7. +8
    14 March 2024 07: 50
    What a delight, it turns out that fewer heretics were burned in Spain than in Europe as a whole. What a blessing the Inquisition brought for all European countries, including Spain, and the burning of heretics and books is simply a celebration of the human soul, it’s so fun! Songs, dancing, general joy that holds the nation together. smile
    1. VLR
      +3
      14 March 2024 08: 26
      Such intolerance is a sign of the youth of peoples and the civilization they create. Even adolescence with its characteristic maximalism. In all nations we see something similar, only in slightly different forms, different “colors” and different degrees of expression. And when (as now) sins condemned by the holy books, like sodomy, are declared virtues in Europe and people are encouraged to be proud of them at gay parades - this is old age and senile insanity.
      1. +4
        14 March 2024 09: 16
        Such intolerance is a sign of the youth of peoples and the civilization they create
        Ah, youth, youth, how it tends to make mistakes. “Well, by accident, well, jokingly, They have lost their way! So they are a child of nature, Even if it’s bad, it’s a child!” (c)
      2. -1
        14 March 2024 11: 16
        You are comparing the incomparable. People do not die from homosexuality, unlike executions.
        1. +4
          14 March 2024 11: 48
          People do not die from homosexuality, unlike executions.

          But alas, people are not born from connections between adherents of homosexuality and transgenderism. Voluntary refusal to procreate. Road to nowhere.
          1. -3
            14 March 2024 11: 49
            The main thing for a person is self-development, personal happiness, and not the presence of children.
            1. +5
              14 March 2024 11: 53
              Children are also about self-development, the hope that they will be able to do what their parents failed to do. Maybe in the same field of activity - like Mozart, whose father was also a musician. Or maybe - completely different, as in the case of the son of the merchant Stanislavsky.
            2. +3
              14 March 2024 23: 53
              Quote: Kronos
              The main thing for a person is self-development, personal happiness, and not the presence of children.

              The main thing for a person is to have the opportunity to be born.
        2. 0
          April 17 2024 08: 54
          Quote: Kronos
          You are comparing the incomparable. People do not die from homosexuality, unlike executions.

          Entire nations are dying from it.
    2. +5
      14 March 2024 10: 48
      Quote: parusnik
      What a delight, it turns out that fewer heretics were burned in Spain than in Europe as a whole.
      Here, of course, overall a good and interesting article, but it’s a little lame. Bruno was burned by the inquisitor fathers, Galileo was almost burned, and in quite Protestant Prussia, Copernicus lived to be 70 years old
      1. +4
        14 March 2024 11: 32
        Yes, the Inquisition brought happiness and joy, it organized such holidays for several hundred years, and then it got tired of the monotony, picnics, theaters took its place, the youth of peoples began to develop into maturity. Mature peoples began to teach younger people how to live. smile
        1. +3
          14 March 2024 17: 19
          Quote: parusnik
          The Inquisition brought happiness and joy, organized such holidays for several hundred years, and then

          Calvin came and generally banned all holidays... but he burned his opponents, but somehow boringly, without a spark tongue
          1. +1
            14 March 2024 19: 03
            Calvin came
            The main one left the auto-da-fé, arranged everything modestly, in a business-like manner, that kind of work. They burned it according to their local priestly traditions.
      2. +3
        14 March 2024 11: 40
        J. Bruno was accused of denying the fundamental tenets of Christianity (for example, he called Moses and the apostles of Christ and Christ himself magicians) and of wanting to found the “New Philosophy” sect, and for 7 whole years he was persuaded to renounce heresy. They claim that there is not a word about his scientific views in the investigation materials.
  8. +4
    14 March 2024 08: 46
    The classics of Marxism rightly put economics at the forefront of human relations. Also in this matter - the Spanish monarchs, not only Ferdinand and Isabella, were guided not only and not so much by religious motives. For some reason, the article practically does not reveal precisely the economic aspect of the activities of the Jewish community of Spain, starting with the Visigoths, and why the Spanish authorities always reacted so sharply to it..
  9. +1
    14 March 2024 09: 31
    Another great article about the reign of Isabella I and the political and military situation in Spain at that time. Who were the Sephardim, Spanish Jews? Unlike the 99th century Germans, the XNUMXth century Berbers, the XNUMXth century Gypsies or other minor documented migrations, there is no recorded or documented evidence of Jewish immigration to the peninsula, so we must note that Judaism, like Christianity, is an Eastern religion that spread to Iberian Peninsula during the Roman Empire. Thus, Spanish and Portuguese Jews are residents of the peninsula who converted to Judaism, and not descendants of immigrants from the eastern Mediterranean. There may have been a few Jewish families who came to the country during the Roman Empire, but XNUMX% of the Jews were Latin Americans who accepted this religion as they accepted other Eastern religions, Christianity, Mithraism, etc., abandoning the old religions based on the old Indo-European pantheon, Belenos, Taran, Vindonia, etc., as the Romans did, which, according to some, was the reason for the collapse of their empire. As for the "Black Legend", which is still preserved, it was a crude attempt to disguise a missionary, not a predatory empire like the Portuguese, Dutch or English. No matter how you look at it, even despite the enormous injustices, in law and practice the Spanish Empire was much more favorable to the indigenous population or resettled Africans. Compare this with the Belgian horror of the XNUMXth century, and the Spaniards of the late XNUMXth century will seem much more humane.
    1. +4
      14 March 2024 09: 32
      "but 99% of the Jews were Hispanic", obviously what I meant to say was "Spanish-Roman".
    2. +6
      14 March 2024 10: 40
      Quote from Carlos Sala
      the Spaniards of the late 15th century will seem much more humane to you
      So humane that there was no indigenous population of the Caribbean islands left at all. However, after the conquest of America, the people there were not divided according to racial principles and there was no “white man’s burden.” In this respect, the Spaniards are more humane than the British
      1. VLR
        -2
        14 March 2024 10: 52
        The natives of the Caribbean islands were not killed - they died from epidemics of unfamiliar diseases, most notably smallpox. The island of Hispaniola, Haiti, was particularly affected. And the Spaniards did not give “humanitarian aid” in the form of blankets for smallpox patients (like the Anglo-Saxons in North America) to the Indians. However, the Indians suffered from syphilis, which before the era of antibiotics was a terrible disease; people went crazy, lost mobility, and became disabled. Additionally, mercury-based drugs destroyed the body of the sick. The Indians also generously provided the Europeans with cocaine and tobacco.
        But the Caribbean is an exception - in Mexico, descendants of Indians and mestizos now make up the absolute majority of the country's population. Unlike the USA and Canada
        1. VLR
          +4
          14 March 2024 10: 59
          By the way, B. Martynov, head of the department of international relations and foreign policy of Russia at MGIMO, wrote:
          “The era of great geographical discoveries has begun. If the Spaniards had not come, someone else would have come. And it is not known what would have been worse for the Aztecs. In Latin America today there are many Indians and mestizos left, but in North America, where the British came, we do not see anything like that. Families went there at once to seize lands, clearing them of the local population, as if from wild animals.”
        2. +2
          14 March 2024 11: 01
          Quote: VlR
          The natives of the Caribbean islands were not killed - they died from epidemics of unfamiliar diseases, most notably smallpox
          There were also unfamiliar diseases brought by the Spaniards, but there is also evidence of las Casas. As for the mainland, by that time the Spaniards had moderated their ardor a little, and the Indians also accepted Christianity and became subjects of the Spanish monarchy. The appearance of new races and mixed populations in Latin America indicates that the Spaniards were not such monsters (not in the first years of the Conquest)
          1. VLR
            0
            14 March 2024 11: 12
            The Dominican Bartolomé de las Casas was an enemy of Cortes and one of the creators of two legends: the “black” one about the Spanish conquistadors, and the “white” one about the “noble Indians.” It was he who proposed using not Indians, but blacks as slaves. The blacks turned out to be tougher and more obedient than the Indians, they cost a penny - African tribal leaders gladly sold their weaker and less fortunate neighbors to European and American merchants, who barely had time to adjust the ships. However, the less fortunate blacks depend on how you look at them. Descendants of slaves from the United States now need to be taken to Africa on excursions so that they can see how the descendants of those who sold their ancestors into slavery live now. And they compared it with how they themselves live in the USA now.
            1. 0
              14 March 2024 11: 20
              Quote: VlR
              It was he who proposed using not Indians, but blacks as slaves
              That's why I suggested that:
              1. The Indians became subjects of the crown, and therefore could not be slaves. Isabella also said this
              2. All Indians were exterminated (or died from disease)
              Quote: VlR
              Casas was an enemy of Cortes and one of the creators of two legends: the “black” one about the Spanish conquistadors, and the “white” one about the “noble Indians”
              This is all Spanish propaganda that wants to whitewash early years Conquests. The extermination of Indians on the islands was written about not only in the USSR, but also in foreign monographs. I can’t give a link to them, I read it a long time ago
              1. VLR
                +1
                14 March 2024 11: 30
                Spanish propaganda that wants to whitewash the first years of the Conquest

                Everything is relative. For example, the first bishop of Mexico, Juan de Zumárraga, founded the first educational institution for Indian children, the first printing house and the first hospitals - this did not even occur to the British in North America.
                Vasco de Quiroga, bishop of the province of Michoacan, founded the city of Irapuato, created self-governing Indian communities, establishing a 6-hour working day and equal distribution of products. Using his own funds, he purchased seeds of cultivated plants unknown to the Indians in Europe, and also brought banana seedlings from Santo Domingo. He organized training for his students in crafts unknown to them until then.
                What do you think of “bloody Cortez”? He banned the work of women and children under the age of 12, determined that the working day should end an hour before sunset, and introduced a day off on Sunday and a lunch break. On his initiative, wheat, rice, oats, grapes, cabbage, turnips, onions and carrots were brought to Mexico.
                1. +1
                  14 March 2024 11: 54
                  Quote: VlR
                  For example, the first bishop of Mexico, Juan de Zumárraga, founded the first educational institution
                  That's all true. I only spoke about the very first years of the Conquest, when no one took the Indians into account
        3. +1
          14 March 2024 11: 05
          Quote: VlR
          But the Caribbean is an exception - in Mexico, descendants of Indians and mestizos now make up the absolute majority of the country's population. Unlike the USA and Canada
          Well, in quantitative terms, there were much fewer Indians in these countries than in Latin and South America. And before Columbus.
  10. +5
    14 March 2024 17: 37
    In any process of conquest, excesses occur. Do not forget that the Spaniards, despite the technological gap in terms of weapons, were only a handful. Not only against the empires or peoples they encountered, but also against the allies with whom they entered into an alliance, they had to show great firmness, because their lives hung in the balance. We are talking about peoples who still made large numbers of human sacrifices, ate human flesh, and built pyramids or wells with thousands of skulls. There is convincing archaeological evidence for this. Any sign of weakness on the part of the Spaniards would lead to a chilling death. The Spaniards brought almost no women with them, and a new world of misceneration arose; not that the Anglo-Saxons didn't miscene too, as the overwhelming patrilineal ancestry of African Americans in the United States shows. The difference was that the Spaniards considered them children, while the Anglo-Saxons did not recognize them as such. This was undoubtedly influenced by Catholic culture. The Spanish expansion was monarchical and missionary, an expansion of the Catholic faith. The expansion of Spanish-European civilization in the broadest sense of the word. It was not a typical predatory metropolis/colony of the Western Empire, which was based on trade, because Spain had no traders and did not attach importance to it. 90% of the gold from the Indies went to support the army, which fought with Protestants, Anglicans, Calvinists, etc., and, of course, with the Turks, throughout Europe. They were also spent on magnificent religious buildings, cathedrals and monasteries. The Spanish economy was very weak and Spain was much less populated than France, Italy, Britain or Germany. If it survived so long in the XNUMXth century, it was only because of its land army - the tercios - and the naval Armada, which provided guarantees, and also because of a kind of messianic faith born of a long struggle with Islam.