"Controlled fall" Air suicide club or victims of special services
This happened ten years ago. The plane crash that occurred on March 8, 2014 still haunts many people. On that day, a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200 disappeared from air traffic controllers' radars on flight MH 370 from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.
There were 227 passengers and 12 crew members on board. Despite large-scale search work that lasted four years, involving a significant number of specialists and modern equipment, the crash site has still not been found. But the picture of what happened and the cause of the tragedy seem to be beyond doubt among experts.
Two-Face Lubitz
About 38 minutes after takeoff, the plane was contacted for the last time by air traffic control as it flew over the South China Sea. Within minutes, the aircraft disappeared from civil radar, deviated from its planned course and headed west over the Malay Peninsula and Andaman Sea before falling out of range.
Later satellite data showed the Boeing was flying southwest over the Indian Ocean. Experts concluded that the crash occurred after the plane ran out of fuel and the engines caught fire - first the left one, and 15 minutes later the right one. The airliner fell into the Indian Ocean at high speed, which may indicate an uncontrolled crash.
The first pilot, Zachariah Ahmad Shah, was recognized as the culprit of the tragedy. Suffering from depression caused by separation from his wife, the pilot deliberately deviated from the route and thus took his own life.
A year later, an Airbus A320 of Germanwings, a subsidiary of Lufthansa, crashed in the Alps while flying from Barcelona to Dusseldorf. The culprit is considered to be the co-pilot of the A320, 28-year-old German citizen Andreas Lubitz, who also suffered from depression, which also pushed him to suicide. Lubitz locked himself in the cockpit and directed the plane downward until it crashed into a mountain.
Interesting coincidences, isn't it?
But let's put it aside for now history Malaysian Boeing to take a closer look at the progress of the investigation into the crash of the German Airbus.
What you immediately notice is that the decoding of the flight recorders and the analysis of the data received, the processing of information and the clarification of the picture of the incident were carried out at a truly Stakhanov pace.
All regulations, procedures, rules were thrown aside for the frenetic race. As a result, less than two days had passed before the authorities established and announced the cause of the crash of the airliner, the sequence of events that led to the tragedy, and named its direct culprit - co-pilot Andreas Lubitz. It was as if someone really wanted the hype around the disaster to die down as soon as possible.
However, are the motives that forced the Germanwings pilot to commit such a terrible crime so obvious?
The image of Lubitz formed by the mass media consists of two halves - light and dark. On the one hand, according to acquaintances, residents of his hometown of Montabaur, members of the flying club where he began flying, he is a modest, friendly, sympathetic guy who dreamed of the sky from a young age and achieved his goal.
On the other hand, Lubitz is a complete sociopath with suicidal tendencies, a patient of psychiatric hospitals and a regular in psychoanalysts' offices. Meanwhile, the very fact of turning to psychiatrists is more likely an argument against the version of suicide than for it.
British specialist Cristobal Owens conducted a study that showed that people who feel depressed and suicidal rarely seek help from specialists. According to Japanese doctors, almost 70% of suicides did not consult a doctor about their psychological problems.
It is also noteworthy that all media reports indicating the pilot’s mental inadequacy were published with reference to anonymous sources - “persons close to the investigation,” unnamed Lufthansa employees or unknown representatives of medical institutions. “Ex-fiancée” and “mother of a classmate,” who so successfully supported the version of depression, are the same mysterious anonymous names.
In the stories about the dark side of Andreas Lubitz, the only real people are expert psychoanalysts who have never seen the pilot, but readily reproduce the standard Freudian educational program in relation to his personality.
On the other hand: everyone who spoke more or less favorably about Lubitz are real people, their names, place of residence, and occupation are known.
As soon as specific sources appear in the media information about the Lubitz case, the topic of suicide immediately fades. Thus, the University Hospital of Düsseldorf reported that the treatment Lubitz received there was not associated with depression. Nevertheless, a strong image of the Germanwings pilot as a psychopathic individual who deliberately destroyed the plane and its passengers was firmly established in the public consciousness.
Chronicle of deferred death
In the Western media sphere, Lubitz's innocence has been defended exclusively by bloggers, such as Stockholm lawyer Henning Witte and retired US military officer Gordon Duff, who insist that the pilot acted under external control. Some proponents of this view recalled the 2004 Hollywood film The Manchurian Candidate, starring Meryl Streep and Denzel Washington, as reproducing a model that may have led to the deaths of passengers and crew of the Airbus A320.
In the center of the plot of the film is a candidate for vice president of the United States, into whose brain a chip is implanted, the key to controlling which is held by a certain transnational corporation. The film is a remake of the early 60s film, which in turn is based on the 1959 novel by Richard Condon. It must be said that by this time the CIA had already been working for several years in the field of monitoring brain activity as part of the MK Ultra program.
However, in order to decide the fate of the Germanwings flight Barcelona - Düsseldorf, it would hardly have needed a complex conglomerate of genetic engineering, neurosurgery and NLP technologies from the 2004 Hollywood film, or something similar. There is a much less exotic and practice-tested method - post-hypnotic suggestion, that is, “delayed hypnosis” or “ideodynamic effect.”
With it, the patient completes the task given to him after some pre-agreed period: an hour or two, or several days, although in science there is a description of a case when the suggested action was carried out exactly a year after the session.
The founder of experimental psychology, Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920), was the first to describe the “hypnosomnambulistic state” in which the memory of suggestion is hidden behind the threshold of consciousness and for the time being does not bother the person, but at the appointed hour the suggested information appears automatically, forcing the suggested person to perform complex acts of behavior and lead to goals without the participation of consciousness.
For example, Wundt's student, the Belgian psychologist Joseph Delboeuf, repeatedly suggested to those hypnotized to perform a certain action after 1 minutes and almost always observed punctual execution of the task, even on the part of those who were not able to accurately determine the time.
It is obvious that delayed hypnosis is not a “Newton binomial”, not a fantasy of conspiracy theorists, and not a mysterious esoteric practice, but a well-known medical method that has been actively used by specialists since the second half of the 19th century. It is equally obvious that since then, research in this area has not stopped; the technique of post-hypnosis has constantly become more complex and improved, including as a way to remotely control a person’s consciousness.
So what really happened on the fateful Germanwings flight?
As follows from the transcript of the conversations in the A320 pilots’ office, communication between the aircraft commander and his assistant up to a certain point was quite ordinary. Lubitz's behavior changes radically at approximately 10:27 a.m. after the commander announces that he is going to go to the toilet and asks Lubitz to begin preparations for landing in Düsseldorf.
Shortly after this, a chair is heard moving back and the door clicking. The commander leaves the cockpit. At 10:30 the plane begins to lose altitude. At the same time, Lubitz does not utter a word; the recording only records his even breathing.
This most “even breathing”, it seems, struck the decryptors and investigators: the “juicy” detail got on the pages of the press. For someone - very inappropriate. Because it actually negates the version of suicide.
The fact is that among the somatovegetative disorders characteristic of a potential suicide experiencing a psychological crisis, experts note intermittent breathing and frequent sighs.
And further.
A person who maintains even breathing until the last seconds of life in the cockpit of an airplane falling from a height of 11,5 kilometers can only be in two states - deep sleep or hypnotic trance. But the pilot did not sleep, as he continued to control. This means we are dealing with the second option.
The words of the commander that he was going out into the cockpit, or the click of the door lock, triggered the mechanism provided by the hypnotic effect of “anchoring”, serving as a trigger, a signal, after which the pilot entered a trance and began to carry out the program embedded in him.
And very little was required of him: lock the door, change the autopilot settings and direct the plane to the ground. While in a trance, Lubitz was not aware of what was happening around him, and therefore could not respond to external stimuli: the commander’s call to open the door, dispatcher requests, warnings from on-board systems about the possibility of a collision.
Call out of nowhere
Now let’s move forward from 2015 a year ago - to March 2014, and from a new angle we will look at the Malaysian Boeing disaster and the behavior of Zachariah Ahmad Shah.
Who was the suicidal killer with 30 years of flying experience and an impeccable record?
Zachary and his wife Faiza were considered an exemplary family; they had three children, the youngest was twenty, so by the time of the tragedy they were all already accomplished people. The investigation also established that Zachary's family had no financial problems. They lived in their own house in a fashionable area of the Malaysian capital.
And suddenly…
“He was going to kill himself. Unfortunately, he killed all the passengers along with himself. This was done on purpose."
– Larry Vance, the former head of the Transport Safety Bureau of Canada, categorically states. And he is not alone. This point of view is intensively replicated by journalists. There was even a sentimental version that Shah made a detour over his home state of Penang to say goodbye to home.
Lost in the stream of similar comments was an ABC News interview with Asuad Khan, the brother-in-law of the Boeing commander, who said that the 53-year-old pilot “had a good life” and suicide was not the reason the plane veered off course. His testimony about the interrogations of the pilot’s widow Faiza Shah and their maid by Malaysian police officers is also interesting.
“[The police asked the women] How was your husband feeling? Is he depressed? Either he has a problem with something, or they have some problem [in the marriage]. All kinds of questions, [including about] his mental state. But he was a normal person. I don't think he was crazy."
– Asuad Khan said.
It turns out that the police showed up at the house of Zacharia Ahmad Shah with a ready-made version and looked for confirmation of it, including in his personal life.
An interesting statement was made in February 2020 by Tony Abbott, who was Prime Minister of Australia at the time of the crash:
“I was very clear that senior officials in the Malaysian government thought from the very beginning that it was a suicide of the pilot.”
Where does such hasty confidence come from?
In May 2021, the British The Daily Mail reported on a study by engineer Richard Godfrey, according to whom Zachariah Ahmad Shah did everything possible to make it difficult for investigators to establish the crash site. The expert pointed out that the aircraft’s trajectory is tracked by the Weak Signal Propagation radio system, which operates using “electronic track cables.”
The missing Boeing crossed eight such “cables” over the Indian Ocean. Godfrey is confident that Shah had knowledge of the system's operating schedule and knew that the radars would not function at night on weekends.
Strange. Let's say a person decides to commit suicide. Let's say he doesn't care about passengers and his colleagues. But why wait seven hours until the fuel runs out to implement your plan? Why was such a bizarre flight path chosen? Why such careful preparation in order to hide the place of the fall?
It appears that the key detail in this case is a telephone conversation that Shah had with an unknown woman a few minutes before takeoff, while he was in the cockpit. What if the unknown person told Shah some new information that completely threw him off balance and pushed him to make a fatal choice?
However, such a development of events is in no way compatible with the cool, calculating behavior of the pilot in the next few hours. And most importantly: it turned out that the phone number was issued using forged documents. Why go to great lengths to convey a personal message. This means that the call had some special purpose, and the caller had good reasons to remain anonymous.
But if we remember the history of the Barcelona-Dusseldorf flight, much of the case of the Malaysian airliner becomes clear.
The unknown woman gave Shah a code word (or phrase), which triggered the program, which, obviously, was laid down in the process of hypnotic suggestion. So it was not Shah who calculated everything in advance, but everything was calculated for him, and the pilot only punctually carried out the task that was instilled in him - a rather difficult one.
At first, his behavior does not stand out until the 38th minute of the flight, when he ends his communication with Malaysian controllers and begins to abruptly change course.
The Canadian Vance mentioned above believes that the Boeing pilot put on an oxygen mask and then depressurized the plane's cabin so that passengers and other crew members lost consciousness. After that, nothing and no one could stop him from working out the program. Like Lubitz until the last minutes, Shah was active, as evidenced by a series of changes in flight paths.
In fact, in both cases we have an ideal “clean” murder. No evidence, no witnesses.
The only “minus” is the lack of motive. But this vulnerable moment is easily eliminated with the help of the version of mental instability that pushed the pilots to commit suicide, which, with the help of the mass media, easily becomes an irrefutable fact. And oddities in behavior and reasons for depression after the fact can be found in almost every person. There would be a desire.
Most likely, the death of two planes was the work of one of the world's leading intelligence services, and these operations, apparently, did not imply any specific consequences. It was just an experiment, an experience necessary to develop a promising manipulative technology.
At the same time, the described plane crashes are probably just the tip of the iceberg; other experiments using post-hypnosis are disguised as “ordinary” crimes, road accidents, accidents that are mentioned in passing in criminal chronicles, and for the most part do not even get there.
Information