The basing points of the Caspian Flotilla are equipped with the latest underwater surveillance systems.

48
The basing points of the Caspian Flotilla are equipped with the latest underwater surveillance systems.
In the water areas of the bases of the naval formations of the Caspian flotilla The construction of sonar detection and tracking stations for underwater objects was completed.

At present, the trial operation of these complexes has begun, during which the specialists of the manufacturer carry out adjustment and adjustment of the equipment. At the same time, servicemen master the work at the stations under the guidance of experienced instructors who arrived from the enterprise.

The main purpose of the stations is the automated detection of underwater targets and objects with the determination of their current coordinates and location. Software and tracking systems allow classification of detected objects depending on the size and their automatic tracking with the calculation of the route.

The commissioning of this equipment will allow the flotilla’s forces to be provided in a timely and reliable manner with comprehensive information about the situation in the Caspian Sea and in the basal areas of ships.
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    2 February 2013 11: 43
    In the light of recent events in the world, strengthening borders has become very important!
    1. +5
      2 February 2013 11: 50
      Something like that, apparently put:
      Configuration No. 1 (on the picture) is a compact noise finder designed to detect low-noise submarines at distances of at least 3 kilometers. Surface targets, including combat boats and rubber boats under the engine - at distances of up to 40 kilometers, which is very important, given the known limitations in their timely detection by other means, say, using radar.

      Configuration No. 1 provides automatic classification, determination of the course, speed of the target, transmission of information about the detected target to the coastal (object) control point.

      The system has autonomous and cable options; it is anchored at depths:

      - the first - up to 1500 meters;

      - the second - up to 300 meters.

      A set of 8 products allows you to control the border with a length of up to 40 kilometers, and from 20 - up to 100. The communication range with the exposed product is up to 60 km. Removal of cable modifications from the coast (control post) can reach 40 km.

      For the stand-alone version, remote control via a / a channel is provided, the communication range is up to 10 km (possible from any object having a g / a communication channel).

      The continuous operation of the cable version is 20 years. Autonomous requires recharging the batteries after 6 months of operation, while the station allows for the purpose of preserving the batteries to be turned off and then turned on again via the control channel.
      1. +5
        2 February 2013 11: 51
        And here is a diagram not of an autonomous, but of a cable version.
        1. 0
          3 February 2013 21: 18
          Igor, do not rule out the installation of an ASG in the waters to combat PDSS, such as MG-4, which I had to work on (I hope they will be newer). I don’t see any reason to listen to the submarine in the Caspian; they can handle the boats and radars.
      2. Oleg Rosskiyy
        0
        3 February 2013 20: 52
        zanoza,
        An analogue of American "Quakers".
    2. +9
      2 February 2013 11: 52
      Something very rapidly all the fleet's efforts are going to the Caspian. Oh, not good. Let's think what options can be?
      Offhand: 1. We plan to support Armenia and will threaten Azerbaijan. 2.We will support America in the attack on Iran. 3. We will support Iran, and strengthen our positions against the Amer bases and their allies in Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.
      4. We plan to send all the nafuy, and when they start to ruffle Iran, we will occupy all the deposits that we liked.
      What other options?
      1. +5
        2 February 2013 12: 05
        Botanologist,
        Personally, I would choose the fourth laughing drinks
        1. 0
          2 February 2013 15: 11
          old rocket man

          drinks . Well, I also tend to this, although it is unlikely. Rather, Azerbaijan and Iran.
      2. +2
        2 February 2013 12: 09
        Botanologist,

        1. Hold the North Caucasus.
        2. Support Kazakhstan
        3. Make Ashgabat more flexible with Baku.
        4. Participate in a future section of Iran.
        1. +2
          2 February 2013 15: 17
          Civil

          Well, it's easier to keep the North Caucasus from the Black Sea, at least to polish it. From the Caspian Sea it is inconvenient, and even with small artillery ships of the Buyan series.
          Kazakhstan ... and what is there. Only if we protect their crafts in the case of a shecher. However, it makes sense.
      3. itkul
        0
        2 February 2013 12: 24
        Quote: Botanologist
        We plan to support Armenia and will threaten Azerbaijan


        I do not think that we will threaten Azerbaijan, otherwise we would not have appointed the commander of the flagship of the Caspian flotilla of the ship "Tatarstan", ethnic Azeri Miriev Vusal Muzoffar-Ogly

        http://structure.mil.ru/structure/forces/type/navy/kasp/flagship/leader.htm
      4. itkul
        +1
        2 February 2013 12: 30
        Quote: Botanologist
        We plan to support Armenia and will threaten Azerbaijan


        I do not think that we will threaten Azerbaijan. Otherwise, we would not have appointed the commander of the flagship of the Caspian flotilla of the Tatarstan ship, ethnic Azeri Miriev Vusal Muzoffar-Ogly

        http://structure.mil.ru/structure/forces/type/navy/kasp/flagship/leader.htm
        1. 0
          2 February 2013 12: 40
          itkul,


          Do you think it will not fulfill the order?
          1. itkul
            +1
            2 February 2013 13: 24
            Quote: Civil
            Do you think it will not fulfill the order?


            I think there will be no such order, against Azerbaijan
        2. 0
          2 February 2013 15: 21
          I do not think that we will threaten Azerbaijan

          Yes, I believe that we should not greatly spoil relations with Azerbaijan. If he guarantees the fight against muslims (I mean Salafis), this is enough to live peacefully.
      5. 0
        2 February 2013 13: 12
        Just working out a warning system. If you have not noticed, then industry representatives are engaged in adjusting the system. And this means that the system is in trial operation. After mining in the Caspian Sea, the remaining navies will be equipped
      6. wax
        0
        2 February 2013 21: 49
        We intend to clearly observe our interests in the Caspian, as With the collapse of the USSR, in this large puddle many people wished to fish.
        The strategic importance of the Caspian lies not only in the volume of hydrocarbon reserves, but even more in the location - it is located between the main current and promising markets for oil and oil products (Europe and Asia), on the one hand, as well as between today's main suppliers of liquid fuel (Middle and the Middle East, North Africa, Russia) to the markets of the Eastern Hemisphere, on the other.
      7. w.ebdo.g
        0
        2 February 2013 23: 00
        option number 5 - to explain to the amers that the Caspian is ours personally and it makes no sense to build the Caspian gas pipeline nabuko)))
      8. 0
        3 February 2013 10: 39
        Rather, the third. Iran is more important to us than "friendship" with the West and America.
    3. +1
      2 February 2013 21: 41
      Right. It is necessary to have not only ears, but also "tentacles", plus a "harpoon". In short, we must be prepared for all the surprises of our unreliable neighbors.
  2. +1
    2 February 2013 11: 44
    Great, you need to have not only teeth, but eyes and ears in order to hear and see the approach of the enemy !!!
  3. 0
    2 February 2013 11: 47
    Underwater tracking equipment, it seems that the Americans didn’t get pierced when our submarine surfaced off their shores ?!
  4. anchonsha
    +1
    2 February 2013 11: 49
    Yes, the Caspian is becoming a troubled place, and therefore it is necessary to get ahead of events and do everything possible for the normal operation of not only the fleet, but also the coastal infrastructure of ships based. and their interactions. We now have everything for this.
  5. +2
    2 February 2013 12: 02
    Fine, but what about the detection of combat swimmers? Can she do it?
    Who is in the know, tell me.
    1. +1
      2 February 2013 12: 23
      for this we’ll launch white sharks in the Caspian –– they will eat them
      1. 0
        2 February 2013 12: 56
        for this we’ll launch white sharks in the Caspian –– they will eat them

        Here we do not need these fish ... they will devour all sturgeons and beluga.
        1. 0
          2 February 2013 13: 07
          and poachers will catch
      2. vsa-xnumx
        0
        2 February 2013 13: 40
        for this we’ll launch white sharks in the Caspian –– they will eat them


        +++++! Well done! I haven’t laughed like that for a long time! good
    2. +9
      2 February 2013 12: 37
      Quote: Old Rocketman
      But what about the detection of fighting swimmers? Can it be? Who is in the know, tell me.

      Good health, Igor! HYDROACOUSTIC STATION FOR DETECTION OF SUBMARINE SWIMMERS-DIVERSANTS “PALLADA”

      Designed to protect a surface ship from underwater sabotage forces and means (PDSS) when attempting an unauthorized invasion of a protected area. It performs the functions of detecting PDSS (including swimmers moving with the help of flippers or using underwater means of movement) classification and tracking them. Information on the current coordinates and direction of movement of targets is given to the forces and means of response and weapons of suppression MPSS. The station is used while the ship is parked in the roads and at basing points. It can be used to protect approaches from the water to coastal structures, terminals and other critical facilities. The station can be equipped with one antenna or, if necessary, expand the protected area with two antennas.
      swimming on fins (Re=0.1 m) 250-300 m
      using underwater means of propulsion (Re=0.2 m) up to 400 m
      Coordinate accuracy
      in range 2% of scale
      heading angle 2 degrees
      "Dead zone" no more than 10 m
      Power consumption
      version with one antenna 500 VA
      version with two antennas 700 VA
      Continuous operation time 120 h
      Time to put the station on alert 5 minutes
      Number of 1 Operators
      Antenna weight 75 kg
      1. +2
        2 February 2013 12: 53
        Tersky,
        Thank you, Victor, and you can’t get sick. The answer is comprehensive hi
  6. +5
    2 February 2013 12: 16
    Quote: Old Rocketman
    Fine, but what about the detection of combat swimmers? Can she do it?


    There really is a security system for a private security company:
    The hydro-acoustic device of perimeter protection is intended for the organization of underwater borders of protection. The device detects the penetration of swimmers who violate the perimeters of protected areas (UPR-09F UPR-11F) located on the shore of freshwater or marine water areas, as well as coastal shallow areas, water intakes, drains and the issuance of official (alarm) notices for technical means of security alarms.
    Its parameters:
    Target Auto Detection Range:
    - underwater swimmers on flippers, not less 350-150
    - underwater swimmers on vehicles, not less 450 -150
    Probability of target detection 0,95
    Error of determination of coordinates by distance / by angle, no more than 2 m. / 2 °
    Overview in the horizontal plane by modules (from 1 to 6) in the sector: from 60 ° to 360 ° 30 °
    The thickness of the controlled water layer from the surface to 40 m to 20 m
    VSU removal distance from APN 5 km 1 km
    The depth of the water area at the installation site of the remote part 2 - 60 m from 1,5 to 40 m
    The number of VSUs served by one set of APNs from 1 to 4 from 1 to 4
    The main technical characteristics are provided with:
    - disturbance of the water surface in the water area
    - current velocity at the installation site of VSU
    up to 3 points
    up to 2 knots
    EMC level 3 class
    Supply voltage ~ 220 V
    Power consumption, no more than 300 W 150 W
    Mean time between failures, at least 36000 hours
    Average service life, at least 10 years
    Warranty period 3 years
    Weight VSU, max. (with anchor device) no more than 300 kg 15 kg

    Maybe there are similar developments for the Navy
    1. Dima67
      0
      2 February 2013 12: 34
      Damn, I’m living in Astrakhan with my family.
      1. 0
        2 February 2013 12: 57
        Damn, I’m living in Astrakhan with my family.

        Hello fellow countrymen. If anything, we will fight off the adversary in one trench! soldier
        1. Dima67
          +1
          2 February 2013 13: 09
          Hi. Pindo .... Sy will not work. Ice cream will end then how do they fight?
    2. +2
      2 February 2013 12: 41
      Quote: zanoza
      There really is a security system for a private security company:

      Greetings, colleague! good do not consider plagiarism, did not read all the comments to the end, hastened with an answer, we will count my post as an addition to yours drinks
      1. +1
        2 February 2013 13: 09
        Quote: Tersky
        complement to your drinks


        Here is my "joint", didn't answer the namesake, and issued separate postSo drinks for that.
        1. +2
          2 February 2013 14: 15
          Quote: zanoza
          issued a separate post

          Well then for your post a separate TOAST drinks !!!
    3. +2
      2 February 2013 12: 55
      zanoza,
      And you, namesake, thank you hi
  7. +2
    2 February 2013 12: 44
    What is the point of scanning something? They threw smart mines in the area and warned.
    Swam past, and she asks you ............... did not answer well, sorry !!
  8. ivinyukhin
    0
    2 February 2013 12: 49
    We will rejoice when it all works.
  9. KamikadZzzE1959
    0
    2 February 2013 13: 08
    I wonder who it decided to acquire submarines there. Well, not Turkmenistan. Did Iran decide to muddy the water in the Caspian? It’s better for him now not to jerk in our direction
  10. niklev65
    0
    2 February 2013 13: 19
    That's right, I believe that all modern and promising developments should be run in the Caspian! It seems to be like better protection from espionage and somehow more compact. Everything is profitable in one word ...
  11. Dima67
    0
    2 February 2013 13: 22
    I’m off topic. But just amers at least someone else won the war
  12. andsavichev2012
    0
    2 February 2013 13: 33
    Comrades, why such a system in the Caspian Lake ??? Catch Turkmen p / l ??? fellow
  13. +1
    2 February 2013 14: 31
    hello to you all
    a little off topic but:
    The Ministry of Defense abandoned the idea of ​​constantly basing the air group of long-range fighter-interceptors MiG-31 on Novaya Zemlya. A senior source in the commander-in-chief of the Air Force told Izvestia that the proposal to Sergei Shoigu had been prepared at the end of last year and was now approved by the minister.



    “The proposal was made after a comprehensive analysis by our specialists,” the source said.

    According to him, the former leadership of the Ministry of Defense decided to transfer the air group to the Novaya Zemlya airfield last fall as part of the development of a common concept for the defense of the Arctic.
    http://izvestia.ru
  14. SEM
    SEM
    0
    2 February 2013 15: 40
    Any systems introduced to protect the borders of the homeland are only a plus, especially in such a tense region, whether anyone likes it or not, but this is inevitability that must be approached very seriously since the development of the event can be very unfavorable for Russia as a whole. The Caspian Sea and the Black Sea judging by the events and the frequent appearance of NATO ships they are very interested in and this is understandable why !!!
  15. evil
    +1
    2 February 2013 15: 41
    Where did the submarine come from in the Caspian ???
    1. SEM
      SEM
      0
      2 February 2013 15: 54
      Well, besides submarines there can be minisubmarins used for sabotage, espionage and counter-gangs, or combat swimmers, for example.
    2. Dima67
      0
      2 February 2013 15: 54
      I don’t know how it is now, but under the USSR, Iran had several babies on the Caspian. And we also had only very small ones. I was alone in Baku before the collapse of the union in the KKF base, but it seemed I was not in working condition.
  16. 0
    2 February 2013 17: 28
    It’s time for the Caspians to strengthen
  17. 0
    2 February 2013 17: 47
    In addition to submarines, underwater drones are now available.
  18. 0
    3 February 2013 13: 46
    Now this region is very hectic. And the mess around Iran will be, and pretty soon. No wonder so much effort has been made in the Middle East. So we need to look more seriously at the Caspian.
  19. Edgar
    0
    3 February 2013 16: 14
    great thing! I hope all the bases of the Russian Navy are equipped with similar equipment
  20. 0
    3 February 2013 21: 13
    During perestroika (be it wrong!) He was on a business trip in the capital of the free state of Azerbaijan - Baku. There are a lot of impressions, but one of the most terrible - a beautiful sandy beach littered with stellar sturdy heads! Indeed, now the same thing is happening on our territory. It would be nice to put sonars with sets of ZPU-4 on our shore (I won’t say where - guess for yourself).