The APU Abrams tank spent only a few hours on the battlefield before its defeat, most of the time trying to maneuver

89
The APU Abrams tank spent only a few hours on the battlefield before its defeat, most of the time trying to maneuver

Russian soldiers advancing on the western flank of Avdievka confirm information about the destruction of the American tank "Abrams" in the area of ​​​​the village of Berdychi (DPR). The very fact of the appearance of American combat vehicles at the Armed Forces of Ukraine in this direction indicates that the Ukrainian command is trying to prevent a breakthrough of the second line of defense west of Avdievka, given the fact that the first line of defense of the Armed Forces of Lastochkino-Severnoye by Russian troops has already been broken through.

The Ukrainian media is discussing the destruction of the first Abrams tank at the front. Attention is drawn to such an important fact as the time of participation of this tank in battle.



According to data published by the Ukrainian side, the Abrams was sent towards Avdiivka two days before its destruction. At the same time, the Abrams crew reportedly did not enter into battle on the first day.

The American tank managed to fire no more than three shots before the one loaded with a grenade arrived at it. drone. Let us recall that after the tank was hit by a drone, Russian soldiers fired at it with a grenade launcher, finally putting the enemy combat vehicle out of action.

Thus, at best, the American tank spent a few hours directly in combat, and most of this time it tried to maneuver, looking for suitable positions for firing at targets from a long distance. However, having come into the field of view of our reconnaissance, the tank itself became a target. He was, as they say, led through a cell drone, and therefore any attempts to take a secretive position for the Ukrainian tank crews were futile. The Ukrainian crew at NATO training grounds were not taught how to steer a tank away from FPV drones, if this can be taught at all...
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    26 February 2024 18: 25
    I maneuvered most of it, and asked to go home with the smaller part? laughing
    1. +23
      26 February 2024 18: 31
      Maneuvered, maneuvered, but failed to maneuver...
      1. +7
        26 February 2024 18: 34
        The American tank managed to fire no more than three shots.....

        I hope no one managed to crawl out.
        1. +9
          26 February 2024 18: 53
          You can also compare the cost and quantity of FPV drones with the cost and quantity of Abrams M1A2 to clarify the prospects for American tanks transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Riding around in open space on a tank for a long time in the current conditions is, in principle, suicide. Moreover, now you can’t really ride a tank even at night - Thermal imagers are installed on FPV drones.
          1. +25
            26 February 2024 18: 55
            Abrasha rode for 2 years and fought for 20 minutes wassat.....but according to the plan of the General Staff of the Ukrovermacht, the Russians were supposed to run away when they saw the Abrams, but something went wrong wassat
            1. +9
              26 February 2024 18: 59
              News for today.

              The first batches of “Ghoul” FPV drones with thermal imagers were sent to the Northern Military District zone. They will also add machine vision, a representative of the manufacturer told TASS.

              He noted that the first priority is to improve rapid frequency changes to bypass electronic warfare dome protection.

              “In the future, and not so distant, there will be machine vision, so that the drone can be aimed and fly independently to the target,” said the agency’s interlocutor.

              The Ghoul drone appeared in the Northern Military District zone in May 2023. He destroyed boats with landing forces on the Dnieper, fortifications, dugouts and enemy strongholds. The drone is used in all areas of special military operations, and has proven itself positively.
            2. +20
              26 February 2024 19: 03
              These wrong Russians, when they saw Abrams, were terribly happy, they almost fought over who would cover first....
              1. +9
                26 February 2024 21: 06
                Well, a prize was announced for him, that’s why there’s such a stir. The men will earn money, the drones will be bribed, and the next one will be fried. good
                1. +3
                  26 February 2024 23: 56
                  Quote: Al Manah
                  Well, a prize was announced for him, that’s why there’s such a stir. The men will earn money, the drones will be bribed, and the next one will be fried.


                  Russian business.
                2. +1
                  27 February 2024 01: 56
                  Quote: Al Manah
                  Well, a prize was announced for him, that’s why there’s such a stir. The men will earn money

                  An unprecedented prize has been promised for "Abrams" - 10 million rubles! The guys made good money. laughing good They had been waiting for them at the front for too long, so Okhlobystin got impatient and raised the bonus to 10 million. And if you manage to capture it as a trophy. fellow To the exhibition ...
                  1. +1
                    27 February 2024 07: 26
                    An Abrams in Berdychi was shot down by an FPV drone operator with the call sign “Rassvet”; he shot it down with the same drone. The UAV platoon in which he serves is commanded by a fighter with the call sign “Kolovrat”.
                    https://voenhronika.ru/publ/vojna_na_ukraine/27_02_2024_avdeevka_rossijskaja_armija_zacepilas_za_okrainy_orlovki_vsu_sdajutsja_v_plen_ili_begut_karta_boevykh_dejstvij_na_ukraine_16_video/60-1-0-15000
            3. -7
              26 February 2024 19: 32
              But according to the plan of the General Staff of the Ukrovermacht, the Russians were supposed to run away when they saw the Abrams, but something went wrong
              It’s just that there was no court division there, and everyone else, especially from the DPR and LPR militias, has no respect for foreigners.
            4. +4
              26 February 2024 19: 52
              Quote: Black
              Something went wrong

              something like that,
              Following the burnt Abrams tank, the Russian army destroyed the Swedish Archer self-propelled gun for the first time
              Source: https://rusvesna.su/news/1708965367
              1. +2
                26 February 2024 21: 00
                And “Luchnik” also had no luck with the maneuver.
              2. +3
                27 February 2024 02: 09
                poquello
                (poquello)
                +3
                Yesterday, 19: 52
                New
                Quote: Black
                Something went wrong

                something like that,
                Following the burnt Abrams tank, the Russian army destroyed the Swedish Archer self-propelled gun for the first time
                Source: https://rusvesna.su/news/1708965367
                Merikatos iron burns well! goodThat's why it's iron to burn! But some are here expOrds, like the warriors in the nose, with snot)) filled Abrash with emotion, just like their murks. And now he is silent, like a fish on ice! laughing
            5. +3
              27 February 2024 00: 34
              Quote: Black
              But according to the plan of the General Staff of the Ukrovermacht, the Russians were supposed to run away when they saw the Abrams, but something went wrong

              Or maybe they ran away from laughter, when he was shot down, the torch gave away. “Invincible” is a child prodigy!
          2. -1
            26 February 2024 19: 05
            Quote from: neworange88
            You can also compare the cost and quantity of FPV drones with the cost and quantity of Abrams M1A2 to clarify the prospects for American tanks transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

            to be precise, they handed over the Abrams M1A1 of the first generations, this is still not A2 at all, although I think A2 would not have left FPV, but the price of the first A1 and A2 is completely different..
            1. 0
              26 February 2024 19: 07
              I think it was an Abrams M1A2.
              1. +1
                26 February 2024 19: 10
                Quote from: neworange88
                I think it was an Abrams M1A2.

                M1A2 - they were not transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, they were given A1 from storage, manufactured in the 80s, and something was changed there a little... up to A2, only in the US Army itself, just a few years ago, all A1s were upgraded
                1. +1
                  26 February 2024 19: 12
                  Well, maybe.

                  TTX "ABRAMS"
                  US main tank (modification M1)

                  Weight - 54 tons
                  Engine power - 1500 hp. strength

                  Armament: 120 mm cannon, 1 12,7 mm machine gun, and 2 7,62 mm machine guns.

                  Crew - 4 person

                  Export price - $6-8,5 million (depending on modification)

                  WHAT IS KILLED?
                  The price of an FPV drone is $500-700.

                  The price of a shot from a grenade launcher is from $120, from a portable anti-tank system - up to $25 thousand.


                  https://www.kp.ru/daily/27571/4896264/
                  1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +2
              26 February 2024 21: 01
              But also not at the price of “geranium”, the can yielded them to Zee.
          3. +1
            26 February 2024 19: 54
            You can also compare the cost and quantity of FPV drones with the cost and quantity of Abrams M1A2

            For American business, every destroyed tank means ordering a new, even more expensive one.
        2. +4
          26 February 2024 19: 02
          Judging by the picture, the lancet hit the turret's ammunition load, followed by the ignition of gunpowder, the tank was disabled
          1. 0
            26 February 2024 19: 56
            The tank is repairable. Either finish off or trophy. You can't forget.
          2. +4
            26 February 2024 20: 30
            Birdhouse, they didn’t weld it on top. What for? This is Abrams - he is immortal.
          3. +3
            26 February 2024 20: 40
            Now the supporters of “I didn’t throw the tower!!!” will come running.
            Although how did it help him?... request
            1. -3
              27 February 2024 00: 39
              Such a small thing as a surviving crew and a high probability of returning to duty after repairs. It’s just that they like to use the word “destroyed” anywhere, although in most cases the word “struck” into such and such units is appropriate, immobilized. It was as if the Armata was also created with an eye to the fact that even if the turret was demolished, the crew would be able to leave the vehicle after the shelling without being burned.
              1. Mwg
                0
                27 February 2024 08: 25
                Judging by the column of flame standing above the tank, the likelihood of this particular tank returning to service is extremely low.
                1. 0
                  27 February 2024 19: 57
                  So this is not from the section - impossible. During June-August 2023, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost 22 Leo2s in battles (while using about 80 units in battles), but 18 were able to be put into service, that is, 4 are irretrievable. Maybe streams of kuma fell into the Abrams's firefighting tank in Iraq, but due to the fact that there was nothing to burn there, nothing burned, and besides, the fire extinguishing system of the Abrams and Leo2 is very powerful and sharp, which often saves the day. Let me remind you of the destruction of Leo2 in the fall of 2023, where either a drone or the Lancet hit at an angle, which touched the turret niche with the ammunition from behind and hit the rear of the turret, resulting in a powerful directed detonation of the ammunition and penetration into the ammunition, which immediately led to a fire. Judging by the open hatches, the crew left the tank, after which they brought up the drone and threw a thermal bar into the hatch, as usually happened with damaged Abrams in Iraq and Yemen. So the BO is burning. And this is still a difference from how in more than 70% of cases T-64 tanks and their descendants behave when the godfather hits the BO, from below in the form of an anti-tank mine and from other sides in the form of an anti-tank missile. Even if now they don’t take a full BC for battle, but only the one that fits in the AZ, we still often see the complete destruction of a tank, with the turret being thrown, since due to the more than 2 times smaller volume of BC, there is a chance of hitting something dangerous higher. To argue with the fact that MBTs like Leo2 and Abrams protect the crew many times better, in my opinion, makes no sense today and would seem obvious to everyone.
                  1. Mwg
                    0
                    28 February 2024 18: 01
                    I found this article by accident, read it:
                    https://dzen.ru/a/Zd4VWdKxYD-YcDuZ?from_site=mail
        3. +5
          26 February 2024 19: 17
          But now we should put it in front of the US Embassy in Moscow - as a “subtle” hint at the fate of America in the event of a conflict with Russia!
      2. +4
        26 February 2024 18: 58
        The United States and its Abramas maneuvered in such a way, trying not to be knocked out in the northeastern military district, that these maneuvers are the beginning of the end of their invincible best and invulnerable tank in the world. Although they had burned in other parts of the planet before, they didn’t want them to blaze in Russia. Prestige, however, is falling. Russian weapons beat their Abramas - symbolically.
        1. +5
          26 February 2024 19: 02
          I wonder if they found the body of Arkashka Babchenko in Abras?...maybe he was driving it to Red Square?, but...he didn’t get there a little, he was tired laughing
          1. +1
            26 February 2024 19: 20
            It was so blazing there that even if Arkashka had been there, he would have burned to hell.
          2. +2
            26 February 2024 21: 03
            The kerosene has probably run out or the filters are clogged.
    2. +1
      26 February 2024 19: 14
      He didn’t maneuver, but “tried to maneuver,” as the note says. That is, apparently, he was stuck in the mud... request
      1. +1
        26 February 2024 19: 25
        He searched, he searched, and they found him.
  2. +17
    26 February 2024 18: 26
    The account is open, the video is blazing noticeably.
    Glory to the Russian army.
    1. +2
      26 February 2024 21: 03
      Quote: AndreyKam_Z
      The account is open, the video is blazing noticeably.

      At the beginning of 2023, Russian businessman, actor and director Ivan Okhlobystin stated in his blog on the Zen platform that unnamed Russian businessmen were ready to pay 10 million rubles for each destroyed or knocked out Abrams tank. We are waiting for the names of the winners and continued successful hunting! drinks
  3. +19
    26 February 2024 18: 26
    The American tank managed to fire no more than three shots before a drone equipped with a grenade arrived at it.

    Like a cockroach with a slipper...
    1. +16
      26 February 2024 18: 32
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      The American tank managed to fire no more than three shots before a drone equipped with a grenade arrived at it.

      Like a cockroach with a slipper...

      You are evil, Vasily.
      The Ukrainians had a high and pure DREAM about a child prodigy... And you - with a slipper!
      How to live in such prose?...
      lol
      1. +5
        26 February 2024 18: 46
        Yes, they have these dreams... or dreams... if you count from the javelin... they get rich with thoughts...
      2. +4
        26 February 2024 18: 58
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        How to live in such prose?

        Alexey! hi Not just prose...
        H-hlu p-s sent “super tanks” as a gift
        The euphoria among the Yankees was short-lived
        And as Aunt Sonya from Moldovanka said:
        Shaw doesn’t feel sorry for the burned-out Abramka
        1. +1
          27 February 2024 11: 55
          Not in "prose" but "in pose" wink They have been living “in a pose” for a long time, like others in the “garden”...
      3. +1
        26 February 2024 19: 04
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        The Ukrainians had a high and pure DREAM about a child prodigy... And you - with a slipper!

        good
      4. +2
        26 February 2024 19: 06
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        You are evil, Vasily.

        Yes!
      5. +3
        26 February 2024 21: 06
        It's time to grow up. Third year of the war. Almost all the prodigies have already been sorted out: from the Javelin and Bayraktar to the Abrams, and they are still waiting for a miracle.
  4. +9
    26 February 2024 18: 26
    Well, that's it..Kirdyk to you, Tsars..) Well done our guys! Do we have graduates of tank universities? It would be interesting to know their opinion about this “device”.
    1. +5
      26 February 2024 18: 33
      Karachun to you, Tseriteli (c)
  5. +3
    26 February 2024 18: 27
    It could also be unmanned, as an option to check how long it will live. However, no one doubted that the Abrashs were not immortal.
    1. +4
      26 February 2024 18: 33
      If you listen to the Ukrainians, every Western prodigy is invincible and unkillable. Typically, Americans evaluate their weapons more realistically.
    2. +3
      26 February 2024 18: 51
      And apparently the Terminator fired three shots. There is no automatic loader there.
      1. +9
        26 February 2024 19: 44
        There is no automatic loader there.
        Eat. Eats bananas
  6. +12
    26 February 2024 18: 27
    September 26 - Did you ask or threatened the Black Sea?
    1. +3
      26 February 2024 18: 29
      The “red line” drawn by Austin was successfully overcome by our anti-tank crews. They didn’t even notice. soldier
    2. +2
      26 February 2024 18: 58
      ,,, A repetition of the situation with German leopards is unacceptable when they were hunted, I saw these calls. Play by the rules,,,
      Lloyd Austin
      How does it feel to play by the rules? Give the green light to Abrams to the front line? And be allowed to shoot at Russian positions? You hegemons, explain your rules.
      He occupies a high post, but he speaks such nonsense.
      1. +1
        26 February 2024 19: 11
        It was IA Panorama, a sarcasm joke from ours.
  7. +8
    26 February 2024 18: 28
    They have already started yelling that this is a Moscow stuffing and a fake, tomorrow the owner Khakhlyatsky will refute everything.
  8. BAI
    +10
    26 February 2024 18: 28
    Everything is in circles. At the first meeting between the Abrams and the T-72, they were also given a hard time. 3 on 3. 2:1 in our favor
  9. +7
    26 February 2024 18: 29
    Strangely different. Neither a “visor” nor an electronic warfare system on such an expensive “toy”. Although I came across images of the M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle from the Ukrainian Armed Forces brigade (47th), with such complexes
    1. +4
      26 February 2024 18: 37
      Strangely different. Neither a “visor” nor an electronic warfare system on such an expensive “toy”.

      It’s hard to say about electronic warfare, it’s not visible.
      There are two options for visors:
      they didn’t plan to use the first one, they wrote that the US actually tried to take them away, and they sent Prizhalo to fight as is.
      The second one writes that Zelensky “annoyed” Biden in this way. (personally I doubt it)
      1. +8
        26 February 2024 20: 52
        Quote: AndreyKam_Z
        It’s hard to say about electronic warfare, it’s not visible.

        Just the opposite. Everything is perfectly visible. A drone hangs above him, filming from all angles and poses. And he is neither awake nor in the spirit. If there were electronic warfare, the drone would go dark and there would be no video.
    2. +4
      26 February 2024 18: 42
      Quote: svp67
      Strangely different. Neither a “visor” nor an electronic warfare system on such an expensive “toy”. Although I came across images of the M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle from the Ukrainian Armed Forces brigade (47th), with such complexes

      Perhaps they planned to use it only in the rear and did not bother with protection request
  10. +7
    26 February 2024 18: 34
    It’s unlikely that the Armed Forces themselves considered him a super duper prodigy... maybe some completely pan-headed person could, but those who have been in the fields for a long time no longer believe in anyone or anything...
  11. +3
    26 February 2024 18: 41
    Congratulations! The infection is burning, the infection is burning! To the soldiers at the front - thank you and take care of yourself!
  12. +2
    26 February 2024 18: 43
    . The Ukrainian Armed Forces Abrams tank spent only a few hours on the battlefield until it was defeated, most of the time trying to maneuver

    How have the Berdychis themselves not rolled out in pursuit of the Abrams? They could have been captured by accident. wassat
    Although that may have been the case request
    If they took out a grenade launcher, either he came close to us, or our people followed him what
  13. DDR
    +3
    26 February 2024 18: 43
    Well, as they say, with a start, God forbid not the last wink
  14. +1
    26 February 2024 18: 44
    You're lying! It can not be ! Super duper Abrams are invincible and blah blah blah.... It was just a mock-up! Hey, little guys, can you confirm what I wrote?
  15. +1
    26 February 2024 18: 45
    There shouldn’t be “barbecues” on the Abrams; they spoil the export potential. A debunked tank can be destroyed by a drone costing a couple of $1000!? The "barbecue" on the tower is a terrible blow to the image of American tank building.
    1. 0
      26 February 2024 19: 01
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Abrams should not have barbecues; they spoil the export potential

      Well, how will Ukrainians fight without a barbecue if there are more vodkas than shells?
      1. +2
        26 February 2024 19: 06
        Quote: carpenter
        Well, like Ukrainians, they will fight without a barbecue
        The owner said you can’t install a “barbecue” on the roof, which means you can’t. If you want barbecue, get into the Abrams microwave with the “Grill” function, but you can’t have a barbecue - it spoils the export look.
  16. 0
    26 February 2024 18: 45
    I wanted to, but I didn’t want to! ) It happens. laughing
    1. -1
      26 February 2024 18: 52
      Quote: Father of Pope Carlo
      I wanted to, but I didn’t want to! )

      Khokhl wanted it, but didn’t want it, but he wanted the Russians and the wrong “Abram”. There is mourning in Ukraine (three days).
  17. +4
    26 February 2024 18: 47
    Even faster than the “leopard” was made. winked Like a show-off boxer in the ring, he didn’t jump for long, got a nickel and a knockout. winked
    1. K_4
      +3
      26 February 2024 18: 54
      In my opinion, Leoperds will also be stronger.
  18. +5
    26 February 2024 18: 50
    Russian soldiers advancing on the western flank of Avdievka confirm information about the destruction of an American Abrams tank.

    It is clear that any piece of hardware burns, but how nice it is when an American Abraham burns. I’ll take 200 grams of Russian and salted mushroom with Cayon pepper. Beauty!
  19. +2
    26 February 2024 18: 52
    Yes, plus the IMR at its base did not suffer for long. F16 is next.
  20. +1
    26 February 2024 18: 56
    Maneuvered, maneuvered, but didn’t steer clear. Ugh, damn it, I didn’t say it. With initiative, in general. fellow
  21. +1
    26 February 2024 19: 04
    Now ukrov has only one hope - the f-16. The only Ukrainian Armed Forces weapon with a zero in the “destroyed” column
  22. +1
    26 February 2024 19: 08
    The APU Abrams tank spent only a few hours on the battlefield before its defeat, most of the time trying to maneuver

    Ukropithecus rolled out a wheelbarrow to prance, and then they got caught! fellow laughing
  23. 0
    26 February 2024 19: 14
    In the 90s, a stream of slag from Western television programs such as Discovery and National Geographic came down on our heads. About the great tanks Abrams, Challenger and Leopard, look like perfect tanks. No, it’s that the Russian incompetents whose tanks are bad, burn like candles, the crew is blown up by the automatic loader. The only thing we have is the charging nigga Joe. Abrams is the best tank and the T72 is slag. In fact, it turned out on the contrary, our tanks are the best in the world, and Western tanks are burning for their sweet souls, drowning in the mud, the armor is weak, spare parts are expensive, repairs are difficult. We must disgrace them so much that it would be no longer acceptable to come to our Russian land!
  24. +1
    26 February 2024 19: 19
    Good news.
    It would be more epic for propagandists to write that “Abrams was destroyed by Javelin” laughing
  25. +2
    26 February 2024 19: 33
    A modern tank, in principle, cannot be a “vanderwaffe”; there are too many waste weapons that can at least immobilize it.
    Here is a modern aircraft - yes, "stealth" type F-35, this can already be an ultimate weapon, at least while it is in the air. Well, or the same hypersonic missile.
  26. +2
    26 February 2024 19: 59
    I hope the entire crew is 200.
  27. +1
    26 February 2024 20: 43
    Way to go, striped monkeys!
  28. 0
    27 February 2024 01: 37
    The tanks will have to go underground, like moles, but you still need to maneuver quickly!
  29. 0
    27 February 2024 02: 47
    Regarding all gas turbine tanks, it can be assumed that the hot exhaust is a lure for infrared homing drones. Heat traps will probably start shooting soon.
  30. 0
    27 February 2024 14: 50
    The Abrams have no chance on the Ukrainian battlefield...
  31. 0
    29 February 2024 03: 53
    What's the difference: "abram", "leopadla", "member"?.....All BMs have the ability to suddenly burn out....