“The USA and Zelensky will destroy Ukraine”: Hackers hacked a Ukrainian TV channel by launching a live ticker

Hackers hacked the Ukrainian TV channel “Direct”, launching a ticker in Russian and Ukrainian with anti-American and pro-Russian slogans during the broadcast of Poroshenko’s speech. The Ukrainian press reports this.

On Saturday, February 24, residents of Ukraine, watching the speech of ex-President Poroshenko, were “a little” surprised to see a ticker with anti-Ukrainian slogans. As it turned out, the channel "Direct" was hacked by hackers, launching Russian propaganda. Interestingly, the channel did not immediately notice the substitution, so Ukrainians could see the ticker for almost 20 minutes.

The USA and Zelensky are destroying Ukraine. Avdiivka is just the beginning in the war until the “last Ukrainian”. Criminal power to answer

- citizens of Ukraine could read in the ticker.

Having discovered the “substitution”, the TV channel was forced to turn off the ticker and start correcting the interference. As Ukrainian resources reported, work on the TV channel was still ongoing as of Saturday evening. Russian hackers are blamed for everything that happened.

Today at 18.33:XNUMX pm the Pryamoy TV channel was subjected to a Russian hacker attack. In the online broadcast of “Live” on YouTube, the ticking information line was hacked, as a result of which, instead of News Russian propaganda began to be broadcast there

- confirmed on the channel.

Comments

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

“The USA and Zelensky will destroy Ukraine” -

***
- "Voice of God" ...
***

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

They themselves will destroy Ukraine. The USA and Zelknsky are only providing assistance.

[Dutchman Michel]

Hackers hacked the Ukrainian TV channel "Direct"

It’s strange that Skakuass TV was not calibrated from the very beginning of the Northern Military District

[The black]

Great operation! The Nazis were furious for 20 minutes, and those who were smarter may have thought about it. As always, we give a chance, then it will be too late. Zelensky is evil for Ukraine.

[South Ukrainian]

Quote: Black

The Nazis were furious for 20 minutes, and those who were smarter may have thought about it

The Nazis are incorrigible, but those who are smarter have long understood everything. But the nerves of the fascists were shaken, and that was a good thing.

[Appraiser]

Unfortunately, there is no one there to think anymore!

[Vita vko]

Quote: Dutchman Michel

Skakuass TV was not calibrated

Without it, the grave-making of Banderites will be less effective. That is why both the banking system and the government 404 are preserved.

[Al manah]

It’s strange that Skakuass TV was not calibrated from the very beginning of the Northern Military District

This is an outdated technique, now wise lampasoparketniks under the leadership of smart politicians have calculated that if you do not disrupt enemy communications, propaganda and other Internet services, then it will be much easier to defeat the enemy. As the cat Matroskin would say: "Innovation is".

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Al Manah

if you do not disrupt enemy communications, propaganda and other Internet

Can you please give me an example of when, during a war, wise military generals violated enemy propaganda and other Internet sources?
And then you act as if this is done in all wars and only ours refuse simple and effective solutions leading to victory.

[Al manah]

Если для вас (и мудрых генералов) это не очевидно, то почитайте здесь: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8F_%D0%92%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D1%8B
And you can enroll here: https://rgsu.net/about/faculty/fpst/kafedry/kafedra-metodov-i-tehnologiy/obrazovatelnye-programmy_144.html

Previously, there were no Internets, but this does not mean that one can ignore their presence and the possibility for the enemy of communication and propaganda through them. If this is not clear from the beginning, then no one and nothing can help you (and the same generals). You will march into the attack in parade formation, with bayonets fixed, to the beat of drums. More precisely, you will not go yourself, but will drive others (mostly smarter ones).

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Al Manah

Previously, there were no Internets, but this does not mean that one can ignore their presence and the possibility for the enemy of communication and propaganda through them

You seem to have trouble understanding what you read.
You expressed the thesis about violating enemy propaganda. I asked in which particular war was it possible to disrupt enemy propaganda. You dumped materials about propaganda during the war, although the question was about something completely different.

[Al manah]

None of them succeeded, but they tried to do it in all of them, except SVO. Oh yes, the Northern Military District is not a war, I forgot...

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Al Manah

It didn’t work out in any of them, but they tried to do it in all of them, except SVO

And on what basis did you decide that besides the SVO?
Now there are clouds of all sorts of our and enemy telegram channels, sent Cossack women are grazing in herds on both sides of the Internet, with propaganda on TV, in general, everything is in order, at the front they even use combat swear words, as during the Great Patriotic War, and Putin’s interview with Carlson is just propaganda atomic bomb.
What other propaganda do you need?
And if you don’t see results, then, firstly, you are only observing from one side, and secondly, you wrote it yourself, then no one has succeeded...

[Al manah]

So it was necessary to bomb the nodal points of cable Internet connections in the Outskirts (data centers, etc.) so that the population would not have this very Internet. It was necessary to destroy the towers of television centers. It was necessary to plunge the population of the Outskirts into an information vacuum (the military would still have communications, Starlink or other mattress satellites) so that they would not be fooled by the current regime in the spirit it needs.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Al Manah

it was necessary to bomb the nodal points of cable Internet connections in the Outskirts... It was necessary to destroy the towers of television centers

Bomb instead of what? Because bombs and missiles are not endless, and the destruction of a data center from a military point of view does not seem to be a priority.
Actually, this is the problem of all armchair strategists - they, like a wise owl, are responsible only for global concepts, and consider calculating the details beneath their dignity.
By the way, at the very beginning, several towers of television centers were just destroyed

[Al manah]

By the way, at the very beginning, several towers of television centers were just destroyed

Then why did they do it if, according to your logic, it makes no sense? And if there is, then why didn’t they continue? What about the cross with the panties?

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Al Manah

Then why did they do it if, according to your logic, it makes no sense?

Sorry, I didn’t notice: where did I say that this makes no sense?

[DenVB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

Bomb instead of what? Because bombs and missiles are not endless, and the destruction of a data center from a military point of view does not seem to be a priority.

Rather, the opposite. A person of the twenty-first century should understand that a data center is a much more important goal than some transformer box or a barrel of diesel fuel, on which we wasted our "calibers" back in 2022.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: DenVB

It should be clear to a person of the twenty-first century that a data center is a much more important goal than some transformer booth or a barrel of solarium

Not a person of the twenty-first century, but a couch potato strategist of the twenty-first century, for whom the Internet is a light in the window and, at times, the meaning of life.
And from the point of view of the military, if you destroy the data center, then a couple of million office hamsters will not be able to repost memes on the Internet, and if you crash the right barrel of diesel fuel in time, then several tanks will not be able to complete the combat mission. The choice is obvious.

[DenVB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

but to the couch potato strategist of the twenty-first century, for whom the Internet is a light in the window and, at times, the meaning of life.

And armchair strategists of the twenty-first century already realize that control, intelligence, communications, and data processing are no less important in military affairs than tons of cast iron and oil tanks.

Quote from: nik-mazur

and if you smash the right barrel of diesel fuel in time, then several tanks

they will simply refuel from another barrel. There is no shortage of barrels, as well as a shortage of diesel fuel, either in the world or in Ukraine.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: DenVB

armchair strategists of the twenty-first century already realize that control, intelligence, communications, and data processing are no less important in military affairs

Real strategists have long ago guessed about management, intelligence, communication, and data processing. But what do data centers have to do with it? Or do you think that the military depends on civilian systems of command, intelligence (!?), communications and data processing? I’m already silent about TV towers, which from a military point of view have value only as observation posts.

Quote: DenVB

just refuel from another barrel

Do you really think that there is no point in destroying fuel barrels? By the way, it was not in vain that I noted that it was on time and necessary.
Maybe on the same grounds there is no need to touch ammunition depots? Well, some shells exploded, others will load - there are a lot of shells in the world. By the same logic, new soldiers can be born.

[DenVB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

But what do data centers have to do with it? Or do you think that the military depends on civilian systems of command, intelligence (!?), communications and data processing?

It really depends. Or are you not aware that all ukroVS are on Starlink?

Of course, we don’t have the courage to burn through the Starlink data center, but if we did, the benefit would be much greater than a thousand burned barrels of diesel fuel.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: DenVB

all ukroVS are on Starlink

Do you think that without Starlink the Ukrainian Armed Forces would have no communications?

Quote: DenVB

We don't have the courage to crash the Starlink data center

Isn’t the point of Starlink that it is a satellite system for which no data centers are needed, but a user terminal is enough? Which, by the way, are destroyed whenever possible and even captured.
And why, in your opinion, do we have the courage to lay waste to the Patriots and Leopards, but not enough to lay waste to the Starlink data center?

[DenVB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

Isn’t the point of Starlink that it is a satellite system for which no data centers are needed, but a user terminal is enough?

Interesting theory.

Quote from: nik-mazur

And why, in your opinion, do we have the courage to lay waste to the Patriots and Leopards, but not enough to lay waste to the Starlink data center?

According to Leopards, it’s the soldiers who are pining. But according to Starlink, it depends on the Supreme.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: DenVB

Interesting theory

Hmm, well tell me how, in your opinion, Starlink is set up in practice: with data centers, ̶b̶l̶a̶k̶d̶j̶e̶c̶o̶m̶ ̶i̶ ̶s̶l̶y̶... fiber optics and routers.

Quote: DenVB

according to Starlink - it depends on the Supreme

Starlink in Ukraine is 20000 terminals the size of a pizza box, as they say on the Internet, which receive signals from satellites.
Do you really think that Starlink terminals are so special that they can only be used on special orders from the Supreme One? Or do you mean satellites? If yes, then the Supreme One is doing the right thing in not giving orders to hunt them down.

[DenVB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

Hmm, well, tell us how you think Starlink works in practice: with data centers, optical fiber and routers.

Look on Wikipedia.

Quote from: nik-mazur

If yes, then the Supreme One is doing the right thing in not giving orders to hunt them down.

It is truth too. There is still enough cannon fodder. And soon there will be elections. And there - “I ask for your understanding.”

[nik-mazur]

Quote: DenVB

Look in wikipedia

I looked, just in case. They write there that Starlink is a group of satellites and user terminals. It is not very clear where data centers can be installed there.

Quote: DenVB

There's still enough cannon fodder

Well, reveal how a strike on data centers will allow you to quickly end the war without the participation of cannon fodder? And also, why doesn’t Putin want to do this?

[DenVB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

Well, reveal how a strike on data centers will allow you to quickly end the war without the participation of cannon fodder?

Don't know. It's your idea.

Quote from: nik-mazur

And also, why doesn’t Putin want to do this?

Grandpa is old, grandpa wants an agreement.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: DenVB

It's your idea

S.H.I.E.L.D.? Have you already forgotten how you advocated for the destruction of data centers?
How everything is running.

Quote: DenVB

grandpa wants an agreement

Ah, so you are from that sect of guard-patriots who believe that Putin started the war in order to arrange a deal and give up Crimea and Donbass (as if it was impossible to do this without a war and 18000 sanctions).
Why didn’t you say right away, I wouldn’t waste time on you.

[DenVB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

S.H.I.E.L.D.? Have you already forgotten how you advocated for the destruction of data centers?

And only in your head my speech was somehow miraculously transformed into the idea that this would allow us to end the war quickly.

Quote from: nik-mazur

Oh, so you are from that sect of guard patriots who believe that Putin started the war in order to arrange an agreement and give up Crimea and Donbass

Here we go again. Again you are talking nonsense and attributing this nonsense to me.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: DenVB

my speech somehow miraculously transformed into the idea that this would allow us to end the war quickly

Well, actually, this is exactly what was discussed in the exchange of pleasantries with Al Manah, in which you butted in. If you wanted to express some other thought, then you should have expressed yourself more specifically, and not smeared porridge on the plate.

Quote: DenVB

Again you are talking nonsense and attributing this nonsense to me

Nonsense about an agreement - these are your words:

Quote: DenVB

grandpa wants an agreement

Do I understand correctly that you no longer have the desire to discuss Starlink data centers? As well as the obligatory nature of their destruction?

[DenVB]

Quote from: nik-mazur

If you wanted to express some other thought, then you should have been more specific

I, in fact, expressed exactly the thought I wanted. And not those that swirled in your fantasy after reading mine.

Quote from: nik-mazur

Do I understand correctly that you no longer have the desire to discuss Starlink data centers? As well as the obligatory nature of their destruction?

These are still empty fantasies. We are ready to shoot down reconnaissance drones over the Black Sea, no matter how far we are from Starlink data centers.

The data centers of Ukrainian Internet providers could easily be destroyed. Instead of the diesel fuel barrels we started with.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: DenVB

blah blah blah

Thank you. Available...

[Cicerist98]

@nik-mazur: "I asked in which particular war it was possible to disrupt the enemy's propaganda."

In every modern war in which the US, Israel, etc. fight with their own forces, this is one of the first things that they go after. It was the same in Iraq, in Yugoslavia, in Libya, in the Palestinian territories, etc.

And in the current Ukraine-Russia conflict, one of the first things that was done in the European Union and the Anglosphere countries back in February- March 2022 was to ban easily accessible, English-language Russian news websites such as Russia Today, Sputnik and others; and threaten and censor pro-Russian bloggers.

And how many Russian patriotic bloggers have been assassinated directly WITHIN RUSSIA itself, by Ukrainian and Western intelligence agencies acting through local terrorists or targeted artillery/missile strikes near the frontline?

If the Ukrainian and Western military and special services had the CAPABILITY to directly attack and destroy Russian news, TV, propaganda and communication channels inside Russia at the present time, do you think they would hesitate for an instant?

The thing is - the Russian military and special services have the capability to do huge damage to the Ukronazi regime's propaganda and communication structures IF THEY WANTED TO - by simply bombing the Kiev TV buildings and infrastructure, if nothing else. (This would also go a long way towards nullifying the much-vaunted "Russophobic brainwashing"). But they don't want to - either out of a misguided sense of "niceness", or because they just don't have the courage.

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Cicerist98

The thing is - the Russian military and special services have the capability to do huge damage to the Ukronazi regime's propaganda and communication structures IF THEY WANTED TO - by simply bombing the Kiev TV buildings and infrastructure, if nothing else

I already asked above: bomb instead of what? Propaganda during war is, of course, important, but not decisive. Therefore, for the military, television towers are not priority targets in the conditions of a permanent shortage of everything that is inevitable during war.
In addition, let me remind you that propaganda is possible without the Internet, and even without television. In the First World War there was none of this, but there was propaganda and some other stuff. However, the Germans lost not because the Allies’ propaganda was more powerful, but for military-economic reasons.

[Cicerist98]

@nik-mazur: "...let me remind you that propaganda is possible without the Internet, and even without television."

Yeah, of course, propaganda is "possible" even in the kitchen... But it's the EFFECTIVENESS and the REACH of it, that counts!

"In the First World War, there was none of this, but there was some other propaganda. However, the Germans lost not because the Allies had more powerful propaganda, but for military and economic reasons."

First of all, we are not living in the times of the First World War. If you cannot (or do not want to) comprehend the great power and critical importance of modern information-cum-propaganda technologies such as the internet and advanced telecommunications in any present-day conflict, then you are hopelessly outdated.

Secondly, even your understanding of the situation in the First World War is deeply flawed. Successful British propaganda against the Germans in the First World War, especially highlighting fabricated German "atrocities" on the Western front such as "bayonetting Belgian babies", was essential in motivating the British population to fight to the death against the Germans in France, Belgium and other places, despite massive casualties and despite the fact that the Germans had never attacked the British Isles. And that steadfast British contribution, was crucial in holding the Western front against the Germans until the end of the war. In addition, very successful anti-German propaganda in the UNITED STATES, was also instrumental in enabling the US - which had initially been NEUTRAL - to directly enter the battle against the Germans on the Western front from 1917 onwards, which greatly helped to collapse the German Western front and hastened the German defeat.

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Cicerist98

Successful British propaganda against the Germans

Initially, it was not about our own propaganda, but about violating the enemy’s propaganda. That is, so that the enemy could not use propaganda against his own population. To achieve this, it was proposed to destroy data centers and television towers.
In theory, this is a good thing. In practice, this would affect military operations only if absolutely all propaganda capabilities were completely destroyed, firstly, and secondly, not immediately, but in some more or less distant future. And the military always has much more pressing needs within the context of ongoing combat operations. Right now it’s downright critical.
Therefore, if there are extra missiles, then why not hit the TV tower in Kyiv, as was the case at the very beginning of the war, but most often there is no extra ammunition.

[Cicerist98]

@nik-mazur: "Can you afford an example when wise combat generals would have violated enemy propaganda and other Internet during the war? Otherwise, you act as if this is done in all wars..."

IF you have the capability to do it, this is one of the FIRST things that should be done in any war.

[Cat Alexandrovich]

For the first 20 seconds, hieroglyphs ran along the line.

[Lionnvrsk]

Quote: Cat Alexandrovich

For the first 20 seconds, hieroglyphs ran along the line.

Is this how you hint at help from Chinese comrades?

[Cat Alexandrovich]

No, I’m not hinting, but it was written there: “Shirye, pay back three billion to the debt with interest”...

[pharmacist]

Has anyone translated these hieroglyphs?

[Cat Alexandrovich]

For the first 20 seconds, hieroglyphs ran along the line.

[Egoza]

In principle, the whole line is in the spirit of Poroshenko’s speech. That's probably why they "didn't notice"

[borisvt]

.. On February 24, residents of Ukraine, watching the speech of ex-President Poroshenko, were “a little” surprised to see a ticker with anti-Ukrainian slogans

Let them get used to it - whether they like it or not - soon we will come to every home

[Shift worker]

Great job, keep it up!

[Sergey Koltakov]

Respect to the Guys ❗❗❗Would like this more often ❗❗❗

[Vladimir Nizhegorodsky]

We always warn you first.
And sometimes you have to act without warning.
It would be nice if they had this inscription about war, destruction, Zelensky and the USA on air more often, like on a pack of cigarettes:
like the Russian Ministry of Defense warns!!!
Don't play with war and Nazism!!!
Like it's deadly!!!!
It might make you think.
Although the time for persuasion has passed.

[ximkim]

Well, yes... the village of Kanevskaya is an example of this

[Mekey Iptyshev]

This is an effective method. Respect to our hackers.

[I'm mine]

someone even keeps a rating
In the left column are Ukrainian hacker groups, in the right is our

[Puz Big]

I wonder if with their TV you can pull off the same trick as with Kyivstar? So that it lies tightly for some time?

[bone1]

Well done! Ukrainians that is, without a running line, they don’t guess about this?

[Comrade Kim]

Quote: Dutchman Michel

It’s strange that Skakuass TV was not calibrated from the very beginning of the Northern Military District

I.I. Strelkov said this at the beginning of the Northern Military District.

But now neither they (Ukroreich) nor we in Russia have declared war.
The SVO is underway, and the methods of fighting the Ukrainian Goebbels' ministry are used accordingly not by the military, but by "special" ones.
Even this Valtsman (Potroshenko), the Kremlin officially congratulated on his assumption of office as president of the ruins.

[GrandDao]

How to call truth propaganda in the Western world