Who are the Petliurists

51
Who are the Petliurists
Head Ataman Simon Petlyura (center) and Colonel Yevgeny Konovalets (right behind Petlyura) take the oath of Sich Riflemen. Starokonstantinov, summer 1919.


The fall of Skoropadsky's state


Skoropadsky's Ukrainian state was supported only by German bayonets ("Vulgar operetta" by Skoropadsky"; "We will be just a bedding for other nations"). His dream of a state with firm power, with people fluent in both Ukrainian and Russian, with its own army and strong industry, in alliance with White Russia, was unrealistic. Another mirage.



The people of Little Russia were split into several parties, each with its own ideal. Some dreamed of communism, others of a “Ukrainian nation”, free from Reds, Jews (as the Jews were called - Author's note) and Muscovites. Still others stood for White Russia - united and indivisible, and joined the ranks of the White Army. The fourth, led by Father Makhno, dreamed of complete freedom. The fifth simply robbed and gathered entire bandit armies.

In November 1818, Germany capitulated, the Germans began evacuating their army from the Little Russian provinces. Skoropadsky's state was left without a patron. But I didn’t have time to find new ones. The hetman tried to come to an agreement with Ataman Krasnov and Denikin, and through him with the Entente, but did not have time. With a manifesto of November 14, Skoropadsky proclaimed Ukraine an integral part of the future non-Bolshevik Russian Federation.

On the same day, leaders of the dissolved Central Rada at a secret meeting in Kyiv decided to rebel against the hetman and restore the UPR (Ukrainian People's Republic). A Directory was elected to lead the uprising, headed by Vladimir Vinnychenko, who was already the head of the UPR government. Commander-in-Chief (Chief Ataman of the Army and fleet) former Minister of War of the UPR Symon Petlyura was appointed. The Petliurists raised an uprising, which was supported by numerous gangs and part of Skoropadsky’s own army.

Within a month, Petliura's troops overthrew the hetman's regime. On December 14, 1918, Skoropadsky signed a manifesto renouncing power and fled Kyiv along with the departing German troops.

The Petliurists occupied Kyiv and massacred Russian officers. Several thousand people became victims of Ukrainian nationalists. At the same time, throughout the country, nationalists robbed and slaughtered Jews. Thus, the bandits of Petliura’s ataman Semesenko massacred half a thousand Jews in Vinnitsa and one and a half thousand in Proskurov.

“In the carriage is the Directory, under the carriage is the territory”


The power of the Petliurites in Kyiv lasted only a month and a half. During this time, the city only managed to change the signs on stores from Russian to Ukrainian.

Formally, all of Little Russia was under the authority of the Directory; in fact, its power did not extend beyond the boundaries of large cities and railway junctions. There has been no power in Little Russia since the collapse of the Russian Empire. Even the iron and disciplined Austro-German army, which occupied the Western Russian provinces, did not have enough strength to control the vast territory. Only cities, railways, important points and punitive raids on hostile territory in order to seize valuable resources, provisions, fodder, and punish rebellious natives.

The leaders of the Central Rada were able to raise 200–300 thousand people to overthrow the Hetmanate. However, they did not have an idea that would unite everyone and competent managers to create a new state. Most of their forces are simply gangs. After the victory, they returned to the villages to realize their victory, engaged in robbery, dividing up the land, and destroying the landowners' estates and enterprises that still survived or were restored under the hetman. Jews were slaughtered. They were also joined by simple anarchists who did not recognize any authority.

There was also a powerful “red”, pro-Soviet part of the rebel movement. Red partisans who fought with the Hetman and German troops. They took an active part in the overthrow of the Hetmanate. Local Bolsheviks, various “independent” Social Democrats, Socialist-Revolutionary “Borotbists” adjoining them. They mainly controlled the local administrative apparatus and enjoyed the support of the rural population.

The officer cadres whom the Hetmanate recruited to form the Ukrainian army openly opposed the Bolsheviks and the Reds.

An interesting fact is that the national army was formed on the basis of Russian officer and non-commissioned officer personnel. Everything happened again after 1991, when a new Ukrainian army was created on the basis and personnel of the Soviet army. Therefore, the basic school of the current Ukrainian army is Soviet.

However, the Directory could only count on a small part of the officers, on small detachments of “free Cossacks” and Galician “Sich Riflemen”. Most of the officers looked at the White Army with sympathy.


Armored train "Sich Strelets"

Zoological nationalism and banditry


Having no support among the people, the Directory of Vinnychenko and Petlyura tried to maintain its dictatorship with the help of terror and propaganda of the most animal nationalism, chauvinism.

Petlyura’s directive to the Inspector General of the UPR Army noted:

"I know that
1) some commanders use the Moscow language outside of service,
2) our language is not used in family life,
3) at parties organized by army units, the wives of commanders chat loudly in the same Moscow language, insulting our sense of dignity and thereby making a depressing impression on the Cossacks,
4) there are commanders who do not consider it impossible for themselves to loudly declare their sympathy for Russia, etc.”

The Petliura press widely propagated the ideas of a “Great Ukraine”. Plans were proposed for the eviction of all Russians (that is, those who had not renounced their Russian origin), and the restoration of the “natural” borders of Ukraine from the Carpathians to the Don and from the Black Sea to the Vistula. The territories of Voronezh, Kursk, Novorossiysk provinces, Stavropol Territory, Don, Kuban, Bessarabia, and part of Poland were included in Ukraine. The Petliurites wanted to get colonies in Siberia, the Far East and Turkestan.

In the territories controlled by the Petliurists, anti-Semitism flourished. The number of Jewish pogroms increased sharply. According to various sources, Petliurists killed 50–60 thousand Jews.

Ordinary banditry flourished. Various atamans and batki, who were formally subordinate to the Directory, considered themselves the real masters of their feeding territories. Numerous gangs with their atamans formally recognized Petliura as their Chief Ataman, and under the Ukrainian yellow-blue flag they expropriated the property of Jews, landowners, the bourgeoisie, and wealthy Cossacks (kulaks) in their favor. Large indemnities were imposed on the surviving Jews.

Ukraine was divided into feeding territories by the gangs of atamans Grigoriev in the Kherson region, Tyutyunnik, Volokh, Struk, Sokolovsky, Bozhko in the Sich, the “red death smoke” of Angel in the Chernihiv region, the “black death smoke” of Hutsol in Volyn, the gang of ataman Marusya Nikiforova and other less famous ones.

Ataman Angel, whose detachment was called the “Red Smokehouse of Death” for the red hoods on their caps, staged a major pogrom in Zhitomir. Vinnichenko demanded that the ataman be shot, but Petliura did not want to sacrifice such a valuable personnel. Ataman Zeleny (Terpilo) formed the Dnieper flotilla in the Obukhov and Trypillya region, robbed river transport and practically paralyzed traffic on the Dnieper.

When Ukraine became “independent” in 1991, the activities of such characters began to be glorified. Streets were named in their honor, monuments were erected, films were made, etc. It is obvious that the villagers who lived in the area of ​​their activity experienced something and suffered when the wealthy segments of the population were robbed. But in general, the activities of their gangs finished off the already badly destroyed economy of Little Russia.

From a region flourishing under the rule of the Russian tsars, the outskirts of Ukraine again turned into a Wild Field with the law of the strong (a rifle gives birth to power), with a completely destroyed economy, infrastructure and culture. The population switched to subsistence farming, fortunately there was such an opportunity.

Dissenters


The Directory was also noted for its active support of those priests who decided to break with the Orthodox Church and create an “independent” Ukrainian church. The schismatics translated the divine service into “Ukrainian language.” Taras Shevchenko was declared a “holy prophet”, the days of his birth and death (February 25 and 26 according to the old style) were included in the number of church holidays. They decided to punish ridicule of the “Mova” with expulsion from the church.

The independent priests did not forget themselves. The compulsory daily wearing of cassocks was abolished and it was allowed to wear any clothes one wishes; the mandatory wearing of long hair and beards was abolished; divorces, second and third marriages were allowed; the privileges of monasticism were abolished, white clergy could occupy episcopal sees, etc.

In this way, story - not a teacher, but an overseer: she doesn’t teach anything, but only punishes for not knowing the lessons (V. O. Klyuchevsky). Everything that destroyed Little Russia after 1917 was largely repeated after 1991.


Simon Petliura (1879–1926), chief ataman of the army and navy of the UPR in 1920
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    21 February 2024 04: 45
    Everything that destroyed Little Russia after 1917 was largely repeated after 1991.
    The trend, however ....
    1. 0
      21 February 2024 08: 47
      Damn place. If you look back at the history of the Kievan period of Rus', there are many analogies.
  2. 0
    21 February 2024 05: 03
    The Directory was also noted for its active support of those priests who decided to break up with the Orthodox Church and create an “independent” Ukrainian Church. The schismatics translated the divine service into “Ukrainian” mov»
    Well, it’s enough to push religion on your own and call the dialect “mova” and there you go. You can make money from everything this way, and this is the basis of all such transformations. In Austria, the German language and everyone says in unison that it is another nation, but here openly one people is divided by the foreign term “nation”.
    1. +2
      21 February 2024 05: 19
      Quote: venaya
      In Austria the language is German and everyone says in unison that it’s a different nation

      This is what neighbors who fear a united Germany say. Austrians think differently
      1. 0
        21 February 2024 05: 24
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        Austrians think differently
        This happened only after 1945 thanks to unbridled propaganda, and before that they still remembered their past, even the Venetian one. Vienna, after all, was at first a Venetian city, like Venice too, by the way.
        1. +3
          21 February 2024 05: 38
          Quote: venaya
          and before that they still remembered their past

          They all had the same past, the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation, which lasted for about 800 years
          1. -2
            21 February 2024 06: 25
            Quote: Dutchman Michel
            They all had the same past
            And before all sorts of empires there, they were simply Veneti.
            1. +5
              21 February 2024 07: 53
              Quote: venaya
              And before all sorts of empires there, they were simply Veneti

              Before the creation of the empire they were Bavarians and Alemanni. And the Veneti are a Slavic people
              1. -2
                21 February 2024 08: 34
                Quote: Dutchman Michel
                Veneti are a Slavic people
                I looked at who lived in the provinces of Longobardia and Veneto, Veneto. So, before the Crimean War, they were part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire with the German state. language and after the seizure of these territories by the Sardinian kingdom with the active participation of Napoleon III, they switched to their native Venetian language and only after the fascist B. Mussolini came to power they were finally accustomed to the Italian language that came from nowhere. Even the Prussian Lusatians still speak the Venetian language. This is all their native language. There are still plenty of Venetians everywhere, although many already speak the more fashionable German language. In Longobardia, there are generally long-haired Longobards, they say that they arrived there from the northeast, perhaps the Scythians produce small Lamborghini Lamborghini cars, but for some reason they are called Italians even though they are really long-haired Veneti.
                1. kaa
                  0
                  22 February 2024 06: 48
                  Well, the Lombards are definitely a Germanic tribe, that northeast is much further north, the mouth of the Elbe. One of the barbarian peoples who grabbed a piece of the Roman Empire in the 5th-6th century.
                  1. -2
                    22 February 2024 07: 27
                    Quote from kaa
                    .. Lombards for sure Germanic tribe, that northeast is much further north, the mouth of the Elbe. One of barbarian peopleswho grabbed a piece Roman Empire in the 5th-6th century
                    Give at least some more or less sober definition of the concepts themselves - “Germanic tribe”, “barbarian tribe”, and in general, based on what documents, that the Roman Empire existed in the 5th-6th centuries? Did you read this in children's fairy-tale books in grades 5-6 or do you have real evidence of assumptions that are so fantastic in all respects? Let me remind you that a certain “German Empire” arose only in 1871, and this empire was organized by Prussia, that is, it should be the Prussian Empire, but they are trying to impose some new “German language” in which this empire is already called “Deutschland” ". Well, where, where did these Germans come from if this word came from the English language and was brazenly imposed in the Russian language in the Republic of Ingushetia. Well, think about why you use words whose meaning is not known to either Russian-speaking people or German people, I suspect that you do too! Please throw out foreign words that no one understands, at least from your vocabulary, and remember that in the Berlin area there lived some Prussians, or Russes, or even Venetians (Russian-speaking or Veneto-speaking “Puddlers” still live in Prussia - check).
                    And these stories about the Roman Empire in the 5th-6th centuries were invented only in the XNUMXth century. You live now in the XNUMXst century and still continue to believe in fairy tales for young children and do not want to be critical of those that have long since gone rotten fairy tales After all, it is not possible to prove these tales with documents, either to you or to anyone at all. And what I write has already been documented today.
                    1. kaa
                      0
                      22 February 2024 07: 32
                      So be it, throw your “documentary” here. (Do not offer Veles’s book)
                      1. -2
                        22 February 2024 07: 38
                        Quote from kaa
                        Don’t offer Veles’ book
                        On what basis???
                        Why do you need all this? Have you already read and translated “Veles’s book” or are you just using gossip? As far as I understand, this topic is not at all interesting to you, therefore, continue to wander in your delusions further, and you can contact me only on specific questions, but you and I are not interested in this at all, and I will answer other people.
                      2. kaa
                        0
                        22 February 2024 07: 45
                        Friend, don't jump off so easily. What does "not interesting" mean? I was deeply interested, and you are like a hare in the bushes. Maybe you don’t even have “documents”...
                      3. -1
                        22 February 2024 07: 52
                        Quote from kaa
                        Friend ...
                        Yes, you are not my friend, you haven’t opened Veles’s book, haven’t read it, and haven’t even translated it. And what should I take from you after this? Why the hell do I need students who have an aversion to real sources, hate facts and stubbornly believe the glitches of inferior individuals of unknown origin?
                      4. kaa
                        0
                        22 February 2024 07: 55
                        You shouldn't be doing that, my friend. Maybe I have this little book in the library next to the Iliad, and here you are pretending to be an idiot. Eh, I wanted to learn something new, but I came across a retrophobe...
                      5. kaa
                        0
                        22 February 2024 08: 59
                        Is the canteen closed?
                        Oh, how I guessed right with the book...
                        lol
    2. -1
      21 February 2024 09: 00
      Quote: venaya
      In Austria the language is German and everyone says in unison that it’s a different nation
      At the same time, Austria in German is an Eastern country, that is, the same outskirts. However, it is a different nation, even with the German language.
      1. -3
        21 February 2024 09: 39
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        Austria in German, Eastern country, that is, the same outskirts. However, it is a different nation, even with the German language.
        Rather, Österreich = “Eastern Empire” with the capital Vienna, that is, the territory of life of the Veneti, who, like in Venice, speak their native Venetian language; German once became the state language there. But in Venice and Longobardy they still continue to speak their native Venetian. And the outskirts are everywhere in darkness, they are everywhere and all around, and in order to create another “nation” I think that someone needs to fork out the money, and there will be more than enough people willing to make extra money on this, in abundance.
        1. +1
          21 February 2024 10: 45
          Quote: venaya
          More like Österreich

          More likely, Ostmark (Eastern Mark). Border territory that protected the southern German lands from the attacks of the Slavs, Avars and Magyars.
          1. -1
            21 February 2024 18: 44
            Quote: Dutchman Michel
            Quote: venaya
            Rather Austria

            Rather Ostmark (Eastern brand). Border territory that protected the southern German lands from the attacks of the Slavs, Avars and Magyars.
            And where do you get all this from? Everywhere I see only the term Austria - where a very clear term is clearly visible rich, and we remember that for some time Vienna was the capital of Das österrichisch-ungarische Reich = Austro-Hungarian Empire, check in any dictionary, refer to your sources, otherwise I will assume that you just came up with the term Ostmark! I see that you are here on the site recently and have published a publication that 3 years ago archaeologists recorded a battle in the area of ​​today's Berlin where people of the autochthonous haplogroup (genus) R500a1 stopped the invaders of the haplogroup (genus) R1b1, as I understand it, you call it a vague non-Russian term "Germans" ". Explain at least what it means, otherwise my teeth on this term have already set on edge and I will soon not be able to stand it and give my own well-founded and very unpleasant translation. The fact that Vienna is the capital of the Veneti was written back in the 1th century, where did some “Germans” come from there?
            1. +1
              21 February 2024 18: 58
              Quote: venaya
              term Ostmark you just came up with

              I think you will find Ostmark in your school history textbook. I just don’t remember which class. Start learning history here wink wink
              1. -1
                21 February 2024 19: 08
                Quote: Dutchman Michel
                I think you will find Ostmark in a school textbook on history. .. Start studying history from there
                And next time you will advise me to look for a term that was just invented out of nowhere in preschool textbook??? Is it still difficult for you to even get information from an electronic translator? Here I already have every right to define you as a person who has not yet graduated from school and therefore is still not accustomed to using completely adult sources. And the fact that you appeared on this site not long ago may well indicate that you are still young.
        2. 0
          22 February 2024 12: 07
          He stood at the origins of the revival of the great Venetian nation, and possibly the empire. He made them remember their great past, trampled upon by vile conquerors! Sacred knowledge, transferred to the chosen one, was used for the benefit of the great people, and those who doubted it were cast into the abyss of ignorance and oblivion. And his humble name is written in the tablets of the ancient power!

          Why speculate on the topic of the great migration of peoples??? Well, there are genetic descendants of Western Slavs (who, according to some sources, came from the Wends) so what?
          1. 0
            22 February 2024 13: 56
            Quote: awdrgy
            .. there are genetic descendants of Western Slavs (who, according to some sources, came from the Wends) so what?
            Why do they still speak their native Venetian language, and what relation can they have to certain “Germans” at a time when a certain “Germany” in English appears only in 1871 and is called “Deutschland” in German. Where are some “Germans” here and what does this frankly vague term mean? Who can tell me what such a term might mean if the state. the language is German, then from the point of view of the Russian language they will be Germans and their country should be called “Nemetchina” as in all languages ​​of the “Slavic” language group, including even Ukrainian. I’m trying to find out on what basis the Veneto residents of Vienna are called Austrians and for some reason the residents of Venice are Italians, although the Italian state arose only in 1861. Can you answer this?
            1. 0
              29 February 2024 09: 55
              Of course, it’s easy. On the grounds that at the moment their life is not bad. And they don’t look for good from good. They will feel sad in a few years, and then perhaps they will need to stir up something. Some will remember that they are Cro-Magnons, others that they are Neanderthals... In general, they will figure it out somehow.
              1. 0
                29 February 2024 10: 08
                Quote: awdrgy
                At the moment, their life is not bad. But they do not seek good from good. They will become sad in a few years, and then, perhaps, they will need to stir up something. Some will remember that they are Cro-Magnons, others that they are Neanderthals... In general, they will figure it out somehow.
                Even without the foreigners who annoyed them, they know very well that they are not some kind of “Italians” invented by someone and prefer to speak not in state. languages ​​such as German or Italian and in their own, native Venetian language, that is, the language of their ancestors. But in Vienna they no longer speak their native language, but the occupation, state language, which has nothing to do with the native language of their ancestors.
                1. 0
                  29 February 2024 11: 34
                  But what kind of Venetian??! - This is Cro-Magnon, they used to exist!!!))
      2. -1
        21 February 2024 19: 43
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        Austria in German, Eastern country,
        I beg you, please tell me, by Christ God, where did you get this translation from: “Österrich" = "Eastern country"??? After all, country in German is "Das Country" as in many languages ​​and you can easily check this, examples - Holland = "Holland", Iceland = "Island", WenLandia, oh Finland = "Finland", oh in Finnish (in the language of the Karelian tribe) = "Suomi", etc. , you can check. And only Denmark = "Dansk" in Danish and in English and in German = "Denmark". It looks like we need to check all kinds of textbooks for such endless ideological sabotage.
        1. +2
          21 February 2024 19: 58
          Quote: venaya
          I beg you, please tell me, by Christ God, where did you get this translation from: “Österreich” = “Eastern country”???

          Last read in amateur
          https://diletant.media/articles/25661782/
          During the time of Charlemagne, the Eastern March (mark - “border land”) - Marchia Austriaca - was formed in the Danube region. From Austriaca came the Russian Austria. Österreich (from Old High German Ostarrichi) - “eastern country”, since Austria in the 9th century was part of the Frankish Empire in the east of the state.
          1. -2
            21 February 2024 20: 50
            Quote: Stirbjorn
            Österreich (from Old High German Ostarrichi) - “eastern country”, since Austria in the 9th century was part of the Frankish Empire in the east of the state.
            Thanks for this very strange link, I need to check everything here where such information came from. Even on this site it was written that the “German language” first appeared in 1531-0 thanks to the Protestant Martin Luther and his translation of the Bible into a previously unknown and naturally new language, apparently coming to those places from far away, which confirms that the second book is on this language was released only in 1574, that is, this language at that time was probably only known by dozens of people. The German language, like Latin with its dialects, was spread through religious “enlightenment”, by the way, for these purposes we used “ancient Greek”, which no one still speaks even in a certain “Greece” that appeared in the 1830s and whose inhabitants until They still consider themselves Hellenes in the old fashioned way and their country Hellas, but now they speak a completely new and fresh modern Greek language. So the information that you provided here can be safely attributed simply to unsubstantiated narratives invented by the Vatican services or something similar, now often called TsIPSO. I remind you that, according to numerous and many years of research, the entire current “Germany” arose only in 1871, and the Russian language was completely banned there only in 1914, and then in connection with the attack of the Republic of Ingushetia. And here on the site, many wrote that the names of rivers, lakes, mountains, villages and cities, even in today’s “Germany,” still have Russian-language roots. Even today there is quite a lot of information about this. I note that what I write here is very consonant with the topic of this article, it is possible that you can agree with this.
          2. kaa
            +1
            22 February 2024 06: 56
            Wait a little, he will also classify Charlemagne as a Slav...
            1. 0
              22 February 2024 08: 42
              Quote from kaa
              Wait a little, he will also classify Charlemagne as a Slav...
              Yes, I already realized that things are heading towards dolboslaviya, with the Veneti, Etruscans and other Slavic-Aryan Vedas. That's why I won't get involved in the discussion anymore. lol
  3. +2
    21 February 2024 05: 42
    oath to the Sich Riflemen

    Typo or incomplete translation from Ukrainian?
  4. +5
    21 February 2024 06: 04
    Who are the Petliurists
    So who are the Petliurists? Their social base, etc. There is no answer in the article.
  5. Des
    +3
    21 February 2024 06: 13
    From the author’s article: “In the territories controlled by the Petliurists, anti-Semitism flourished. The number of Jewish pogroms increased sharply. According to various sources, the Petliurists killed 50–60 thousand Jews.” And the Jews forgave them for this.
    1. +4
      21 February 2024 07: 54
      Quote: Des
      And the Jews forgave them for it

      In Ukraine, even now, a Jew is in charge, who will give the German Nazis a hundred-point head start
    2. +2
      21 February 2024 08: 49
      Well, how so? Today they are taking revenge.
  6. +4
    21 February 2024 06: 17
    in the article you can see confirmation of my thoughts under yesterday’s commentary on the article about Bohdan Khmelnytsky that Taras Shevchenko was not some kind of beacon of friendship between peoples, but was an ardent Russophobe and anti-Semite, which is why he was adored by both the Petliurites and then the OUNites and Banderaites. He still reads it now. If you read his poem “Haydamaky”, it’s just an ode to Ukrainians famously chopping off the heads of Muscovites, Jews and Poles. Well, in his poem “Katerina” it is difficult to find more hatred for Russians than in Shevchenko. And since the poem “Katerina” ends with a scene about a poor kobzar, that is, about the son of Katerina, who was betrayed, deceived and driven to suicide, and the monster Muscovite did not recognize his son, then it becomes clear why the Russophobes dubbed Shevchenko himself a “kobzar” - they say Shevchenko is the embodiment of a sufferer from the “damned Muscovites”.
    If also in the light of today’s article, since it is about the writer and Petlyura, then in Bulgakov’s novel “The White Guard” Colonel Bolbotun, this is the prototype of Colonel Bolbochan who was actually shot by Petlyura.
    1. +2
      21 February 2024 09: 26
      If you read his poem “Haydamaky”, it’s just an ode to Ukrainians famously chopping off the heads of Muscovites, Jews and Poles. Well, in his poem “Katerina” it is difficult to find more hatred for Russians than in Shevchenko.

      I would like to ask, have you read these works yourself? Judging by this
      And since the poem “Katerina” ends with a scene about a poor kobzar, that is, about the son of Katerina, whom he betrayed, deceived and drove to suicide and did not recognize his son monster moskal , then it becomes clear

      then it becomes clear that you didn’t read it.
      The Moskal in “Katerina” is not “someone of Russian nationality.” This is a soldier. In Ukraine, the 25-year conscription conscription was popularly called “shaved into a Muscovite” (because the newly minted recruit served the Russian crown). In this particular case, it is not nationality.
      1. +1
        21 February 2024 12: 08
        you are writing lies. Throughout his entire work, Shevchenko called Russians “Muscovites” with hatred towards them a hundred times, but his works were not always about soldiers, recruits or war. Shevchenko called Russians Russians only twice in his work (which means he knew the word “Russian”), but even then he characterizes Russians with the word “Russians” as bearers of the Jewish principle. That is, greedy and dirty infidels...
        And what difference does it make if he called the Russian Ivan in “Katerina” a Muscovite, or would he call the Russian Ivan in “Katerina” Russian. Anyway, the whole point of this poem is what nonhumans these Russian Muscovites are.
        1. 0
          21 February 2024 12: 39
          you are writing lies.

          Oh really? And which part of my comment is not true?
          Anyway, the whole point of this poem is

          here in these lines
          This is what they do in the world
          people themselves are people!
          This one is knitted, that one is cut,
          he is destroying himself...
          For what? Lord knows!
          Look, the light is wide,
          there's just nowhere to shelter
          lonely people.
  7. +6
    21 February 2024 10: 48
    Jews (that's what the Jews were called - Author's note)
    And this is how they are still called in Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and for some reason no one faints because of this...
    The power of the Petliurites in Kyiv lasted only a month and a half. During this time, the city only managed to change the signs on stores from Russian to Ukrainian.
    Better than Bulgakov, no one told about this
  8. +2
    21 February 2024 12: 34
    Dzerzhinsky, after the liberation of Ukraine from the Belopoles, wrote to Lenin that the entire intelligentsia was Ukrainian, Pro-Petliura, and how did this happen in three years? From 1917 to 1920, given the lack of the Internet, and television and radio...
  9. +1
    21 February 2024 13: 12
    Article, plus.
    A small inaccuracy, namely, Petliura could not take the oath of the Sich Riflemen in the summer of 1919 in Starokonstantinov (as indicated in the photo), all Petliura’s Starokonstantinov events, very stormy, took place in November-December 1919.
  10. +2
    21 February 2024 13: 17
    Both Pan-Ataman Petlyura and Father Bandera are now turning over in their graves in horror over who became their ideological “heirs.” And they became killed
    people of the Ukrainian party, economic and Komsomol nomenclature, workers of Soviet republican ministries and departments, law enforcement agencies, industrial administration
    enterprises and infrastructure organizations that made “political” decisions in the Ukrainian SSR until 1991, and, of course, the Jewish mafia. Where would we be without her? That is, everyone whom the “lords-atamans” considered the FIRST ENEMIES of independent Ukraine became their IDEAL heirs! And what they, in Soviet times, disposed of and managed, through the launch of mechanisms and tools for privatization and corporatization of property, they began to OWN. And through private market-valuable property, through assets and capital associated with it, they received bourgeois capitalist power. And even Jews, as those who suffered most from Ukrainian Nazism, as new property owners, financial usurers and trade speculators, became “cynical Judeo-Banderists”! This is what greed leads to. And the simple, ordinary population of Ukraine was simply cruelly and cynically robbed, robbed, allowed to be robbed and robbed by predators and swindlers from all over the world, and then “sent into retirement”! Just like we did in the 90s and 2000s(. And the BIG QUESTION is why the authorities in the Russian Federation systematically recognized and legitimized all their “Bandera regimes, starting from 2004, collaborated with them, had joint businesses. And that’s all these “processes” of independence were launched, first of all, from Moscow and Leningrad, and only then they were “picked up” by the capitals and authorities of the “national” republics...
  11. +2
    21 February 2024 21: 51
    Funny article. the author tries to draw parallels between those years and today. I have nothing against it, but why isn’t a word said about how the Bolsheviks managed to solve those terrible problems? How they were able to suppress all that chaos and why people followed them. Keep quiet about this. An excellent explanation for this was given by an eyewitness and participant in those events, Mikhail Afanasyevich Bugakov. Even the ardent hater of the Bolsheviks, Turbin Sr., is forced to admit: The people are not with us, the people are against us. What the current Russian government cannot boast of is that it has brought the situation to a bloody meat grinder where it could have been solved surgically.
    1. 0
      22 February 2024 06: 37
      Korchagin, Pavel Andreevich!
    2. 0
      28 February 2024 00: 18
      The Bolsheviks were followed by the urban proletarian poor and the peasantry. Farm Ukraine, predominantly middle peasant and kulak, reacted to the Reds either expectantly or with hostility. The strength of the Bolsheviks was in less disunity (than other political movements) and a clearer sense of purpose. And by that time military force was already on their side. And strength, as you know, breaks straw. Those who did not follow this power were then forced to submit to it, or left the lists of those living in this world.
  12. 0
    April 14 2024 19: 21
    Who are the Petliurists? To put it simply and more popularly: a political movement in Ukraine during the time of the Civil War of 1918–1920, of blessed memory, based on aggressive Ukrainian bourgeois nationalism, which, in turn, was implicated in rabid Russophobia. In fact, it was an expression of the interests of the Little Russian bourgeoisie and nationalist-minded intelligentsia that came to power, who did not have any specific political and economic program, and, accordingly, did not have the support of the majority of the population (despite the presence of their own army). As in the ditties sung by the population at that time: “There is a carriage at the Kiev station, the directory sits in it. And she looks out the window with longing - after all, her entire territory is under the carriage!
  13. 0
    April 14 2024 19: 40
    Interesting fact. In post-Soviet Ukraine (after the circulation of a temporary currency - coupons) there appeared its own monetary unit - the hryvnia. For those who don’t know: at first these were well-made banknotes in denominations from 1 to 100 hryvnia. Then, as inflation progressed, bills of 200, 500 and, finally, 1000 hryvnia appeared. But the point is not in the dignity of paper money, but in its design. As decoration, they depicted the most outstanding personalities of Ukraine: from Vladimir the Great to Vladimir Vernadsky. But Symon Petlyura (despite his current praise in all Ukrainian media) is not among them. Or is he not an outstanding personality, or is everything still ahead, and his portrait will be decorated with a 1 hryvnia banknote after some kind of hyper-inflation? laughing