The West and Russia: the attraction of a country with an unpredictable history

40
The West and Russia: the attraction of a country with an unpredictable history

The novel “One Hundred Years of Solitude” by the Colombian writer Gabriel García Márquez is called by many, not without reason, the best of the 20th century. Generation after generation of the Buendia clan flashes before the reader, and the fate of each hero is permeated with an irresistible feeling of loneliness.

But what is a hundred years? For a family this is a decent amount of time, but for the country? Well, just a few moments in a thousand years stories. So the history of Russia’s loneliness in its confrontation with the West goes back at least five hundred years. Not even just loneliness, but the confrontation between our and Western civilizations.



Intervention


And we can consider this confrontation starting with the Ruriks or Vladimir the Baptist, or even with Ivan the Terrible. By the way, it was then that the first sanctions were introduced against our country. But we will return to the distant past, and first let us remember that the most severe aggravation of the anti-Russian pandemic occurred in the collective West in 1917 - at its very end.

Russia has been growing and strengthening for many centuries; the country even emerged from wars as a stronger state. And Europe, beaten by Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great, Suvorov, and then under Napoleon, came out with anger and was waiting for the moment when it could bite us more painfully.

The time for the next invasion came at the beginning of the twentieth century, even before the end of the world massacre. First World War. Immediately after October 1917, the Civil War and foreign intervention began. Almost all of Europe at this difficult time for Russia decided to try to finish off the fallen empire and grab as many territories from it as possible.


By the way, the countries of the East also took part in the intervention, which is almost never talked about today. But Japan and even China, which was absolutely impotent at that time, also decided to keep up with the Europeans in dividing the “Russian pie.”

The samurai wanted to tear away the Far Eastern territories from Russia, planning to create a buffer state there under their protectorate. By October 1918, the number of Japanese troops in Russia reached 72 thousand people.

China wanted to establish its control over the Chinese Eastern Railway and set up opium poppy plantations in our border territories. For comparison: during the Time of Troubles, only the Swedes and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth set their sights on the Russian lands, although what was happening then in the south and east was generally shrouded in darkness.

The Entente powers immediately after October refused to recognize the Workers' and Peasants' Government of Russia, and the Peace Decree was assessed as a violation of the terms of the 1914 treaty between Russia and the Entente powers. And already in December, Great Britain and France entered into an agreement on the areas of future operations of British and French troops on the territory of our country.

The British zone included the Caucasus, the Trans-Caspian territory and the Cossack regions, and the French zone included Bessarabia, Ukraine and Crimea. The Entente included Siberia and the Far East in the region of interests of Japan and the United States.

The Entente was preparing an intervention in the southern and eastern regions of the country, providing not only for the suppression of the revolution, but also for the colonization of Russia. Even then, the economic blockade of the country began. Let us recall that at this time the Soviet government was seeking Russia’s withdrawal from the First World War.

Decree of peace and “obscene peace”


In the Decree on Peace, Lenin's Council of People's Commissars appealed to the warring powers to immediately conclude a just peace without annexations and indemnities. On December 9, 1917, peace negotiations began in Brest-Litovsk. Already on January 27 (February 9), the delegations of Germany and its allies signed a separate peace with the government of the Ukrainian People's Republic (UNR) in Brest-Litovsk.

The Germans called this world “grain”: in exchange for military assistance against the Soviet troops, the UPR undertook to supply Germany and Austria-Hungary with a million tons of grain, 50 thousand tons of cattle, eggs, lard, sugar, hemp, manganese ore, etc.

The head of the Soviet delegation, Trotsky, then officially notified the negotiating partners that Russia did not recognize separate agreements between the Central Powers and the Central Rada. Trotsky’s legendary, but essentially clever formula: “we will stop the war, but we will not sign peace” became a response to the German ultimatum. The negotiations were interrupted on January 28 (February 10), and the peace was signed not by Trotsky, but by Joffe.

But already on February 18, the Austro-German troops launched an offensive in the northern direction, which later developed into a general offensive in the entire zone from the Baltic to the Black Sea. Rumors spread about the approach of “huge German hordes,” and long before the enemy appeared, cities and stations were left without a fight.


For example, an advanced detachment of German motorcyclists entered Pskov and... occupied the big city. On February 21, 1918, the Council of People's Commissars adopted the decree-appeal “The Socialist Fatherland is in Danger!” From “soviets and revolutionary organizations” it was required "Defend every position to the last drop of blood."

On February 23, Lenin was given a German ultimatum, which was given 48 hours to accept. It read:

“Soviet Russia must recognize the independence of Courland, Livonia, Estland, Ukraine, Finland, withdraw troops from their territories, transfer provinces in Anatolia to the Ottoman Empire, completely demobilize the army, disarm the navy, grant Germany most favored nation rights in trade until 1925, allow duty-free exports ore and other raw materials to Germany.”

At this time, the Soviets did not have the opportunity to provide a worthy rebuff or carry out a counteroffensive. On March 3, in Brest-Litovsk, a peace treaty was signed between Soviet Russia, on the one hand, and Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Bulgaria, on the other.

Lenin himself called the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk “obscene.” And this is still a good definition for the agreement, according to which the country lost 90% of coal, 73% of iron ore, 54% of industry, and the outlines of its western borders returned to the era of Boris Godunov. But already on November 3, 1918, in connection with the revolution in Germany, Soviet Russia denounced, or rather, simply annulled both the treaty and additional agreements to it.

But the intervention continued


On August 3, 1918, the US War Department gave the order to send military personnel to Vladivostok. Note that American forces in the Far East amounted to about ten thousand soldiers and officers. And the number of Japanese troops in Russia by October 1918 reached 72 thousand people, troops of other countries - 28 thousand people. These forces occupied Primorye, Amur region and Transbaikalia. And later northern Sakhalin.

Evidence of the cruelty of the American military against the local population is easy to find in the Russian Historical Archive of the Far East, where the “Acts on the tortured and executed peasants in the Olginsky district in 1918–1920” have been preserved. In Japan, in 2017, letters from Japanese soldier Waiti Tanabe, who was in Siberia from 1918 to 1920, were published. Tanabe writes about the actions of his commander:

“It was decided to burn everyone who joined the extremists,”

that is, to the red ones.

And indeed, according to him, in only one village, Ivanovka, all the houses and 300 residents were burned. Japan, during its participation in the intervention, removed from the occupied lands everything that it could confiscate and, of course, seized all the best fishing grounds on the Pacific coast.

The question of the fate of part of Russia’s gold reserves, transferred by the White Guards to Japan “for safekeeping,” still remains unresolved. The Americans exported timber, furs, and gold from the Far East.

After the defeat of Kolchak's troops, foreign intervention in Russia lost its meaning. By the winter of 1920, all American troops had left Siberia. Japan only withdrew its troops from Vladivostok in October 1922.

But who else took part in the intervention?


Among the countries participating in the intervention were, for example, 4 thousand Australian soldiers stationed in Arkhangelsk and Murmansk. Canada also sent 500 of its artillerymen and approximately four thousand soldiers to Siberia. Even India stationed its expeditionary battalions in Transcaucasia.

Truly, this was no longer an “invasion of twelve languages,” as during the war with Napoleon, but simply “all the flags are visiting us” with the most bloodthirsty intentions. In addition, among the interventionists were residents of European colonies.


Alexander Vertinsky described the French intervention in Odessa interestingly:

“Some exotic African troops peacefully walked along the streets of this beautiful seaside city: blacks, Algerians, Moroccans, brought by the occupying French from hot and distant countries - indifferent, carefree, poorly understanding what was going on. They did not know how to fight and did not want to. They went shopping, bought all sorts of rubbish and cackled, talking in a guttural language.”

Soviet-Polish war


The last to be thrown against Soviet Russia were the Poles, to whom independence was promised by the Provisional Government, and given personally by the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, Lenin, who by decree renounced the treaties on the division of Poland. But the then leader of Poland, Pilsudski, was impatient to revive the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth within the borders of 1772.

He hoped to regain control over the Ukrainian, Belarusian and Lithuanian lands. Landlord Poland - this “last dog of the Entente” was ripe for an offensive only at the end of April 2020, when, with the consent of Petlyura, Polish troops captured Kyiv.


However, the Red Army forced the Poles to leave the “mother of Russian cities.” At the end of July, the Red Army occupied Bialystok, Grodno, and Vilnius, and Tukhachevsky’s troops rushed to Warsaw. The key moment of the entire war was the Battle of Warsaw in August 1920. The Poles managed to repel the Reds - the well-known “Miracle on the Vistula” happened (They performed the "Miracle on the Vistula").

The export of the revolution failed, and in the fall of 1920 military operations were stopped. Under the terms of the peace treaty, Poland gained independence, and borders were established: Poland received territories east of the Curzon Line - western Belarus and Ukraine. How many years have passed since then?

And Japan still dreams of getting our territorial waters for its fishermen, capturing Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, and Poland wants to regain Western Ukraine and Western Belarus! Truly, nothing changes in the world!

Old, old sanctions


At the height of the Civil War, on October 10, 1919, sanctions against Russia were imposed on the initiative of US Secretary of State R. Lansing by the United States and, of course, its American satellites: Great Britain and France. Sanctions were introduced because they realized that it was not possible to overthrow Soviet power by military force.

The then British Prime Minister D. Lloyd George stated:

“The idea of ​​suppressing Bolshevism by military force is pure madness... and relying on them (Denikin, Kolchak, Czechs and Poles) means building on quick sand.”

Then our enemies bet on the opportunity to win by organizing a famine and cutting off food supplies to Soviet Russia.

The economic blockade continued until January 16, 1920, when the Entente decided to ease sanctions and trade transactions with the “Russian people” were allowed. The sanctions were finally lifted in 1925. At the same time, the United States received the main benefit from the sanctions. Thus, imports of American goods in 1925 were the largest and exceeded European ones.

By the end of the 20s of the last century, about 800 large American companies were already suppliers of products. However, only in July 1935 was the first agreement on trade relations between the USSR and the USA signed. In the 1930s, the USSR became one of the largest importers of American machinery and equipment. The reason for the US turn to the USSR is clear - the Great Depression in the States (1929–1939).


But let's go back to 1925.

This year, new sanctions were introduced - the so-called “golden blockade”. The formal reason for it was the curtailment of the NEP and the termination of existing concession agreements. As a result, the USA, Great Britain, France and a number of other Western countries refused to trade with the USSR for gold and demanded that Russia pay for the equipment sold in oil, grain, and timber. Since 1930, it was possible to buy technology and equipment only for grain.

According to a well-founded assessment of a number of historians and publicists, all this was done with the aim of stimulating protest sentiments among the population of the USSR. The drought of 1931 worsened the situation, destroying a significant part of the harvest, and it was impossible to purchase food in the West precisely because of the gold blockade. The result of this sanctions policy was the famine in the USSR of 1932-1933, which went down in history as the “Holodomor”.

It was only after 1934 that gold began to be accepted as a means of payment again. The next sanctions against the USSR were introduced in 1939 due to the outbreak of the Soviet-Finnish war. But due to the outbreak of World War II, these sanctions were of a demonstration nature. The total turnover of Soviet foreign trade increased from 271,4 million rubles in 1939 to 485,2 million rubles in 1940.

After Nazi Germany attacked the USSR on June 22, 1941, anti-Soviet sanctions were simply not introduced. The USA, Britain and France wanted to crush the German military potential with the help of the USSR and at the same time weaken the Union, which was waging its war of liberation.

But immediately after the end of World War II, the Cold War era began. And sanctions as a tool of influence on a potential enemy have again become in demand.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    19 February 2024 05: 54
    Author, can you tell me whose support the interventionists enjoyed or who the interventionists supported, besides Petlyura in Ukraine..
    1. +8
      19 February 2024 06: 14
      Quote: parusnik
      Can you tell me whose support the interventionists enjoyed?

      smile So. ity.. They all (from the British and the French, to the Japanese and Americans) pursued exclusively their own interests. Is not their ..and this they supported.. various “Volunteer” military formations.. whose leaders promised them all the riches of Russia.. for a hundred years to come.. .
    2. +5
      19 February 2024 07: 09
      Quote: parusnik
      Author, can you tell me whose support the interventionists enjoyed or who the interventionists supported, besides Petlyura in Ukraine..

      Apart from?....And you read on the Internet about the Paris Conference of the Entente countries in December 1917. It clearly states which forces were given funding and why.....that's who got down to business, they supported him...

      And Germany did the same with its satellites. The Denikinites even had a representative office in Berlin, and Denikin himself was buried in the USA in 1947 as commander-in-chief of the allied army... And then reburied in Moscow. I hope it’s clear who supported and supports whom??
      It is not difficult to understand, because all white armies were created in occupied territories.
  2. +5
    19 February 2024 06: 20
    It is interesting that today the actions of the Bolsheviks of that time are often remembered and spoken of, which seem erroneous, dubious or completely wrong.
    But there is no assessment about the events of the 90s.
    If after the revolution there was a “obscene peace,” as Lenin himself said, then what then in the 90s.
    1. +4
      19 February 2024 07: 28
      In the 90s it was all the same. And the Belovezhskaya Treaty was signed not far from Brest.
      And now the North Military District is a continuation of the Civil War in Ukraine.

      The Red Army drove out the Petliurites of the UPR and the Deninikinites and the Poles, took Kyiv twice and liberated Crimea from the Wrangelites. They forgot history, so it repeats itself, like a forgotten lesson... They played with the movie images of “white patriots”, and they were resurrected... these are the Syrskys, Zaluzhnys and others...
      1. +1
        19 February 2024 11: 49
        Quote: ivan2022
        ... They played with the movie images of “white patriots”, and they were resurrected....these are the Syrskys, Zaluzhnys and others...

        But in addition to these film images, words from songs and humor were also embodied...
        Gaidar steps ahead!

        He who was nothing will become everything!

        ...the decaying West...We should rot like this...

        And here it is am it came true! At its most intense feel sight!
  3. Msi
    +4
    19 February 2024 08: 18
    As a result, the USA, Great Britain, France and a number of other Western countries refused to trade with the USSR for gold and demanded that Russia pay for the equipment sold in oil, grain, and timber. Since 1930, it was possible to buy technology and equipment only for grain.

    Curiously, I didn't know. Overall I liked the article.
    And so. Well, thank you to the Bolsheviks (and the people for supporting the Bolsheviks) for saving Russia in those hard years...
    1. 0
      19 February 2024 11: 39
      Overall I liked the article.

      It’s interesting that the beginning of the article, about the great Colombian writer Gabriel García Márquez, evoked completely different associations in me!
      Gabriel García Márquez, Colombian writer, publisher and politician, Nobel Prize 1982, Neustadt Prize 1972, 2012 in Russia, was celebrated as the Year of García Márquez. He was awarded the Order of Honor, in addition to this he has awards from different countries --- Mexico, Chile, France, Cuba. He died on April 17, 2014, at the age of 88. He is called a representative of magical realism. I have read different books by this writer. (But not 100 years of solitude!) I myself don’t understand the words “magical realism,” but the grotesque, the accumulation of some terrifying inconsistencies in events, the exaggeration often reminded me of events from Russian history.
    2. +1
      19 February 2024 12: 42
      According to the statistical collection “Foreign Trade of the USSR for 20 years 1918-1937.” in 1930, the volume of grain exports amounted to 4765 thousand tons. in the amount of 882404 rubles; timber – 7422 thousand tons. in the amount of 743461 rubles; furs - 3155 tons worth 336559 rubles; petroleum products – 4712 thousand tons. in the amount of 687888 rubles. These were the main export items, and there were also supplies of ore, coal and other materials.

      For 1932 exported grain - 1730 thousand tons, timber - 5689 thousand tons, furs - 3107 tons, petroleum products - 469781 thousand tons, coal - 920 thousand tons, manganese ore - 416 thousand tons, iron ore – 342 thousand tons, flax – 82,5 thousand tons.

      From 1931 to 1934, more than 260 tons of gold were exported from the USSR.
    3. AAK
      -2
      19 February 2024 21: 59
      I would say differently - “thank you” to the Bolsheviks for bringing the Russian Empire to the “hard years” and creating the Soviet Union on such conditions in which all sorts of nationalities initially parasitized the RSFSR and the BSSR (the Ukrainian SSR, in terms of the balance of subsidies/own profits, came out to approximately 0), and then, having ripped out enterprises built with Russian money from the economic system of the Union, they also crap on Russia during the collapse and continue to crap now...
      1. Msi
        +4
        19 February 2024 22: 16
        I would say it differently

        Everyone is strong in hindsight... Take it, do it better... try it.
  4. +7
    19 February 2024 08: 33
    The competition between the two systems produced more than just the Cold War. In this competition, ordinary people acquired social guarantees. This cannot happen when all countries in the world exist with the same social system. Only opposites can build world harmony. Aristotle wrote about this. But we have somehow forgotten this.
    1. +6
      19 February 2024 10: 01
      Hegel seems to have written about the unity and struggle of opposites, but Aristotle wrote in his “Politics” that the art of housekeeping should be separated from the art of personal enrichment.But in the modern world, on the contrary, everything is built on this.....with us, whoever is rich has power, and whoever is not is a beggar.... Marx and Aristotle were not oligarchs....like fools, not understanding what any man understands... . .
  5. +8
    19 February 2024 08: 43
    So the history of Russia’s loneliness in its confrontation with the West goes back at least five hundred years. Not even just loneliness, but the confrontation between our and Western civilizations.
    Is this an example of Orwellian doublethink? Or another victim of the Unified State Exam? Peter 1 especially resisted.
    And Europe, beaten by Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great, Suvorov, and then under Napoleon, came out with anger and was waiting for the moment when it could bite us more painfully.
    Is this why Ivan the Terrible hired the Danes, led by Rode, as his fleet? Peter went to Europe to study crafts and fought in alliance with Denmark, Poland (Saxony) and Prussia against the Swedes?! And Suvorov with the Austrians (Prince of Coburg) against the Turks?! What nonsense, sorry.
    1. +1
      19 February 2024 09: 27
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      Is this why Ivan the Terrible hired the Danes, led by Rode, as his fleet? Peter went to Europe to study crafts and fought in alliance with Denmark, Poland (Saxony) and Prussia against the Swedes?! And Suvorov with the Austrians (Prince of Coburg) against the Turks?! What nonsense, sorry.

      Many have forgotten that Russia is a European country with European culture, history, faith, and future. And Russia has a future, no matter how the European turn to the East is taking place. The turn to the east occurs in trade... But not in the mind.
    2. +1
      19 February 2024 16: 20
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      Is this an example of Orwellian doublethink? Or another victim of the Unified State Exam?

      She's an artist. She sees it that way request
      And in general: “Don’t shoot the pianist” laughing
  6. +12
    19 February 2024 09: 33
    For centuries, Mother Russia was surrounded by enemies who constantly tried to capture and rob it, which is why it only became healthier and passion grew in size - apparently, it built its defense correctly.

    Ivan the Terrible fought with the West, without even suspecting it, since Astrakhan and Kazan are in the east. Orwell is partly right - the East is the West, and the West is the East. We don't accept Kipling.

    Peter the Great opened a window to Europe, introduced European dresses, shaved beards and generally tried to make Russia a European power, apparently just for defense against this very Europe.

    In the 18th and 19th centuries, high society spoke French - probably to mislead the enemy.

    The Bolsheviks took advanced European teachings and tried to use it to build their country, also most likely for camouflage, in fact it was a cunning move in the fight against the West.

    Only in the 90s of the last century did the enemies palm us off with anti-people authorities (all the authorities before and after that were, of course, people’s), which misled the people - they say that we are part of a common civilization.

    But now everything has been fixed, our eyes have opened wide, we finally realized that it is time to close the gates and the enemy will not enter our fortress, which has been besieged for many hundreds of years.

    Now let’s heal!
    1. +5
      19 February 2024 09: 46
      Quote: S.Z.
      But now everything has been fixed, our eyes have opened wide, we finally realized that it is time to close the gates and the enemy will not enter our fortress, which has been besieged for many hundreds of years.
      All this grace is described in Sorokin’s novel “The Day of the Oprichnik.” This is where the fighters against the West and lovers of all kinds of bonds are dragging us.
      1. -1
        19 February 2024 12: 36
        Why novels? There is a living example - the DPRK.
        1. +2
          19 February 2024 13: 35
          Quote: Kmon
          Why novels? There is a living example - the DPRK.
          Sorokin describes the national flavor - with a wall in the West and an economy according to the principle, we give China resources, he gives us goods. Everything else is our bond, in the form of conciliarity, Orthodoxy, etc. But in 2006 it was published
  7. +4
    19 February 2024 10: 42
    Another clumsy attempt to pull the owl of propaganda onto the globe of history. And when the author tries to attach Rurik to the “confrontation of civilizations,” it becomes clear that she has the most distant concept of history, but clearly strives to “fluctuate along with the party line.”
    1. +2
      19 February 2024 16: 25
      Quote: Dekabrist
      And when the author tries to attach Rurik to the “confrontation of civilizations”

      But won’t he be a Tatar-Mongol? laughing
  8. +2
    19 February 2024 11: 21
    We have no fewer predictors of history and the “great future” than in Judea of ​​biblical times, prophet sits on prophet... Everything is OK here.... But the past is really not predictable.
  9. +5
    19 February 2024 12: 16
    A. Kozyreva! From which Soviet troops did the UPR try to defend itself in December 1917 by concluding an agreement with Germany? Did Medinsky have a story going on? I no longer wanted to read the paid opus.
  10. 0
    19 February 2024 12: 19
    All the same, the NEP began to be curtailed in 1928, and not in 1925. So that is not why the “golden sanctions” were adopted. But simply because I really wanted to shit. By the way, from a historical point of view, it is simply amazing how everything coincided in 1929: the collapse in the States, the abolition of the NEP in the USSR and the beginning of the first five-year plan with an emphasis on industrialization with the priority of American companies.
    Even goosebumps...
  11. +7
    19 February 2024 12: 45
    They like to kick the USSR, just now in Irkutsk, a rally was held in honor of the memory of Kolchak, and in order to raise the “fighting spirit”, they remember the successes of the USSR... The author, for reference, the RSFSR, and later the USSR, was under a diplomatic blockade, many countries they just didn’t see it on the map..
    1. +3
      19 February 2024 13: 38
      So Kolchak is a criminal, no one rehabilitated him, and the meeting was probably approved by the authorities.
      1. +1
        19 February 2024 16: 05
        and the meeting was probably approved by the authorities.
        no police were seen...
  12. +3
    19 February 2024 14: 53
    Stop “playing” at the “noble” White Guard. All their slogans are about “United and indivisible Russia”. This is for complete idiots. The reality is that only the Bolsheviks (with all the pros and cons in their activities) saved Russia. And they created a superpower, the Great Soviet Union. The fact that a bunch of complete “brilliant” degenerates and traitors destroyed it, to the applause of a duped electorate, is another story. The one who “sinks” for the monarchy, the White Guard, etc. - this is either a corrupt character or an enemy.
    1. +2
      19 February 2024 16: 07
      The one who “sinks” for the monarchy, the White Guard, etc. - this is either a corrupt character or an enemy.
      Those who “drown” consider themselves patriots..
      1. +7
        19 February 2024 17: 01
        Judge by their deeds. Under the monarchy, some people will become counts, princes, noblemen, etc. (But these positions are already almost filled). Others are the disenfranchised tax-paying population (which is approximately 85% of the population). Those who belong to the first group are a bunch of complete “brilliant” degenerates and traitors. And those supporters of the monarchy who belong to the second group are hollow beaks. Who believe in the kindest monarch, similar to the fairy-tale Tsar Berendey. But it won't be like that. Under the monarch there must be counts, princes, high-ranking nobles and further down the list. They need to be fed very well. And who will feed them? Taxable population.
      2. 0
        19 February 2024 18: 58
        Gabriel García Márquez describes very well how a new ruler needs to form his elite
  13. BAI
    +3
    19 February 2024 16: 15
    4 thousand Australian soldiers stationed in Arkhangelsk and Murmansk. Canada also sent 500 of its artillerymen and approximately four thousand soldiers to Siberia. Even India stationed its expeditionary battalions in Transcaucasia.
    these are all English troops
  14. -1
    19 February 2024 16: 54
    In the South, the territory of Russia during the Time of Troubles was as far as Astrakhan, without the North Caucasus, in the East it reached the Ob
  15. +3
    19 February 2024 17: 24
    The title of the article does not correspond to its content.
    It is more appropriate to talk about the force of attraction from the West that acted on the citizens of the USSR earlier, and is now acting on the Russians.
    There is something to talk about, it will always be topical and relevant.
    A higher standard of living, the opportunity to purchase more goods with a salary.
    It’s still not easy to compete here for a combination of reasons.
    A higher quality of life is more complex and multifaceted here. But here you can compete.
    But this is where the desire to compete and improve is not visible.
    For example, our roads are simply devilishly inconvenient and dangerous. And, judging by our regional city, in the field of road construction the principle of “one step forward and two steps back” is observed.
    Another example, they created the “State Services” portal, and in response they were allowed to call 5-6 times a day with advertising from mobile operators, dentists, banks and who knows who. Also on the principle of “one step forward and two back.”
    I wish I could find out who has so bewitched us, and especially our leaders, that the simplest activities that can significantly improve the quality of life are banned and are not implemented under any circumstances.
  16. +2
    19 February 2024 18: 09
    50 thousand tons of cattle,
    laughing
  17. +2
    19 February 2024 21: 03
    In my opinion, it is somewhat straightforward and emotional. During the time of Rurik, the West Slavic tribal unions were not enemies of the East Slavs, some were even, perhaps, related. Over time, with the advent of Catholicism and Germanization, relations changed.
    During the time of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the princes of the Moscow Principality still remembered their kinship with the princes of the Lithuanian Principality and the Russian Voivodeship within Poland.
    With Peter 1, close contacts with the military of European countries began. Many different Germans, from Prussians to Scots, served faithfully in the Russian army. They wrote their names in the history of Russia.
    Russian and European troops fought shoulder to shoulder against Bonaparte. So there were different moments in the history of relations between Russia and Europe.
    And regarding the “export of revolution” to Poland: Poland was as much a part of the Republic of Ingushetia as the Tambov region. Moreover, one of the most revolutionary-minded. But the revolutionary movement in Poland and Finland (and the Baltic states) was brutally suppressed by the tsarist generals - the White Guards Pilsudski and Mannerheim, with the active help of the occupation forces; many revolutionaries from there took an active part in defending the revolution in central Russia. So, in my opinion, it is not correct to talk about “exporting revolution” to Poland.
  18. +1
    19 February 2024 21: 27
    I will vote for Shuvalov, for his palace, for his dogs, so that his Shuvalov highness will fly and transport his dogs for vaccinations at my expense. There is nothing more important than the Shuvalov dog. All and uniformly, all together, the whole society together let’s say - remove, damned Westerners, sanctions from our Shuvalov, a faithful servant of Russia, return vaccinations to his dogs. We will give everything for his dogs, we work for this, to keep his dog fed, to pay for planes and vaccinations. And don’t you dare disappoint the master, we are slaves, and he is the master. This is why the USSR was destroyed, this is why they did everything
  19. ada
    -1
    22 February 2024 04: 15
    ... So the history of Russia’s loneliness in its confrontation with the West goes back at least five hundred years. Not even just loneliness, but the confrontation between our and Western civilizations.
    ...
    This is not history, this is a physical magnitude of the multidirectionality of the habitat that imposes its information mask on the inhabitant of these lands from generation to generation and these civilizations are irreconcilable, even a stone there knows that it is a stone on this side and lives with this thought until it is abraded into dust, but also she remembers everything.
  20. 0
    25 February 2024 07: 02
    The Bolsheviks saved Russia!