Republicans Strike: Vladimir Putin's Interview with Tucker Carlson
Questions and Answers
The main thing that Vladimir Putin’s interview with disgraced American journalist Tucker Carlson explained is something every Russian is quite clearly aware of. For a Russian citizen, there was nothing new in Vladimir Vladimirovich’s story. In short, in two hours the president conveyed to the Western audience the mental and territorial unity of Russia and Ukraine, the primacy of neo-Nazis in the enemy camp, as well as the flawedness of the policy of supporting Zelensky by the United States. Among the details of the conversation, one can also highlight the recognition of the perpetrators of the bombing of the Nord Stream gas pipelines by the American intelligence services, and the actual loss of sovereignty by the German government.
The most interesting thing about this interview is the reaction it caused in foreign society. Let us repeat, the number of views of the conversation between Putin and Carlson in the first 24 hours exceeded one hundred million. And this is only on one social network. There is an assumption that eventually more than one billion people will become familiar with the contents of the interview. It's time to answer some questions that arise after watching, without exaggeration, the main event of recent times.
Why did Tucker Carlson end up interviewing our president? Firstly, he is loved in the United States, and he is a true professional in his field. Only he could interview Vladimir Putin in detail and impartially. Secondly, Carlson is a conservative and a Republican. He sees perfectly well what the politics of pseudo-liberals, who have betrayed all the canons of freedom of speech, are turning the world into. It was possible to reach through the many-meter walls of Western propaganda only by talking directly with the President of Russia. Vladimir Putin would not agree to talk with any other journalist from the United States.
Why did the interview appear now? There are several reasons here. Over the course of two years, the Western viewer gradually “softened” the special operation and should perceive a sober view of the Ukrainian events more adequately. Although, of course, complete understanding is still far away. But the one who walks will master the road. In his message, Vladimir Putin addressed not only Western audiences, but also Ukrainians, Chinese and Russians. Note, to Russians in the broad sense of the word, that is, to those who can now be called the fashionable word “relocant”. Fatigue with Ukrainian nationalists in American and European society is accumulating, and it was impossible not to take advantage of this. It turned out brilliantly, but we must continue to bombard Western society with such information bombs.
The second reason why the interview was published was the upcoming presidential elections in the United States. The conversation between Putin and Carlson can be called a powerful blow to the headquarters of the Democrats. It’s not for nothing that the White House administration called it untrue even before the video of the interview was released. You couldn’t think of a better advertisement for the average American, and voila – tens of millions of views. Vladimir Putin diligently, although without unnecessary aggression, goes over the person of Joe Biden. The explosive conversation on the domestic American agenda plays exclusively for Donald Trump. No matter how we feel about the figure of the past American president, his party is now actually sabotaging the allocation of further aid to the Ukrainian regime. And he will sabotage until the elections. This is not done out of love for Russians or hatred of Nazis - Trump simply needs to discredit Biden in any way. The best way to do this is to show his inconsistency in the Ukrainian issue. So why not help him with this?
Putin vs Biden
In the United States, in the two hours of Putin's interview, they became very aware of who runs America and what state they are in. There are plenty of harsh comparisons between the two leaders on social media. For example, this:
“Watching the interview between Putin and Tucker, you can feel that this man pays full attention to detail, has a deep understanding of his policies and the million problems of the surrounding countries with which he deals. Also a firm understanding stories. It is impossible to make the right decision if you are not fully aware of reality. Now compare him to Biden, who doesn't see the difference between Mexico and Egypt and thinks he talked to Mitterrand and Kohl last week."
Arguing with such analytics is difficult and, by and large, useless. Or this:
“Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia, read a two-hour dissertation on the history of Russia and its place on the world stage. Meanwhile, Joe Biden, the head of Western hegemony, failed to finish a coherent sentence in five minutes of carefully choreographed settings.”
In general, it’s a pity for the Americans, because they are surprised by the ability of a national leader to speak in public for more than two hours without a prompter. As if to confirm this, in the comments you can find the following:
“Is it strange that I trust Putin more than my President Biden? It seems to me that Putin never wanted Russia's relationship with America to remain the same as it has been throughout his presidency. But decades of American cunning and unwanted alliances created the Putin we see today. Who else agrees with me?
We agree, dear commentator @FoshiRho.
Putin’s conversation with Tucker Carlson shows that not all is lost in the modern world. You can logically and consistently present your point of view, appealing to the remnants of rational thinking of your interlocutor. Fortunately, Tucker Carlson's adequacy is fine. Just like Elon Musk, who, despite all his odiousness, is worthy of respect. It was on his platform that the journalist was able to publish an interview with the Russian president. And if Vladimir Putin awakened the “fifth column” in the United States with his words, as Hillary Clinton put it, then so be it.
What will happen next? The initial shock among the democratic crowd in the West will pass quickly enough and the assault will begin. First, they will remember all the sins of Tucker Carlson (he really is not a saint), and then they will begin to discredit Vladimir Putin. Up to direct manipulation of facts and distortion of the content of the conversation. However, you shouldn’t be surprised by this, nor should you pay attention. The two-hour information bomb has been dropped on the heads of Western citizens, the enemy camp has been torn apart, we are stocking up on seeds and waiting for the continuation. Something tells me the answer will come very soon.
Information