Lessons from the strike in Shakhty
Since January 15, there has been a strike at the Khimpek plant in the city of Shakhty, Rostov region of the Russian Federation. Workers from Uzbekistan and Tajikistan went on strike. Quite unexpected for modern Russia news, since we don’t have to observe strikes, we are such a patient people. And suddenly boom! Strike!
And who started it? The same migrants whose power we are told about from almost every newspaper. But the authorities don’t even itch about this, except that Bastrykin from time to time organizes temporary actions designed to at least slightly cool the degree of long-suffering of the people.
If all this had happened in peacetime, this news would probably have been blown out of proportion, and we would have simply enjoyed the grandiosity of our officials. But the time is different now, not peaceful. And we should look at this situation based on the principle of “who benefits.”
It is no secret that the influx of “hardworking migrants” and their offspring has caused a sharply negative attitude towards them from the indigenous population. Both legal and illegal (of which there are many more), they consider Russia their land, on which Sharia law should be established, and therefore the laws of Russia are not binding for them. So they rob, rape, kill in the streets just because we are not Islamists (not to be confused with Muslims).
It’s not the influx itself that’s frightening, but the fact that they have become require! And they demand not only as guests, but they began to feel like masters of the Russian land!
In the case in Shakhty, the fact that these “owners” came from Great Britain adds a special piquancy. Here we see the open arrogance of the Anglo-Saxons, who are accustomed to having someone pull chestnuts out of the fire for them. As I already said, we live in the period of the Northern Military District, and it would be a sin for the Anglo-Saxons not to use anyone just to destroy Russia. We must remember that the true goal of the Anglo-Saxons, since the time of Ivan the Terrible, was to destroy Russia and turn it into their colony.
It is strange that law enforcement officers did not try to find the real instigators of the strike. After all, according to Donskoy Textile LLC (Khimpek brand), the incident was explained as follows:
Not every Russian receives such salaries.
And in general, it should be noted that for a long time now migrants have been going not to where there is demand for low-paid professions - janitors and so on - but to where the salaries are very high. They do not want to settle in Chechnya or Dagestan; they are drawn like a magnet to Moscow, Leningrad and other cities where there is an offer of jobs with high salaries.
It is hardly worth assuming that a certain competitor is behind the incident in Shakhty. Here we should perceive this either as an attempt to rake the heat with the wrong hands, to harm Russia on the part of the Anglo-Saxons, or as a desire of the pro-Islamist lobby to escalate the situation until the authorities make concessions to it.
It must be admitted that there are reasons for this.
Almost every day we witness that the crimes of migrants are hushed up, that they are given much shorter sentences than representatives of the indigenous population, that the impudence of newcomers is approaching a critical point.
The incident in Nizhny Tagil is clear evidence of this. I cannot find a logical explanation for the fact that migrant crimes are discussed with representatives of diasporas. By what right, may I ask?
But if we remember that in the Chechen Republic the norms and laws of Sharia have been almost openly introduced, where it is allowed to beat people under investigation and declare this a feat, where the head of the republic openly threatens with physical violence those who do not please him, then there is nothing to be surprised at.
I will not cite all the cases of the dominance of the pro-Islamist lobby (again, please do not confuse them with Muslims); anyone can easily find them on the Internet. I want to return to the question: who benefits?
After much reflection, I came to the conclusion that this is primarily beneficial to those oligarchic circles that are concerned only with their own profit, and therefore put the interests of their pocket above the interests of the Motherland. Moreover, their thirst for profit coincides with the interests of the united West!
How much have you heard about the oligarchs purchasing something for the SVO? I did not hear. But Roma Abramovich bought iPhones for mercenaries who killed Russian soldiers, and he didn’t get anything for it. A classic example of the political shortsightedness of the authorities.
But is it worth simplifying, reducing everything to banal profit?
Of course no. There will always and everywhere be a whole complex of reasons, but in this situation, the trigger is precisely the connivance of the authorities on the issue of concessions to migration. Only a tough force approach, coupled with a change in migration policy along the lines of Qatar or the UAE, can stop the consequences. Because if you give slack once, then they will take advantage of it a second time, and a third time. No wonder the chief imam of the Moscow Cathedral Mosque, Ildar Alyautdinov, said at the Uzbek conference:
Russia must remain a country where faiths coexist peacefully with each other and the principle prevails: a guest is always a guest, no matter how warmly he is greeted.
And the momentary benefits of relaxation and indulgence for migrants will certainly lead to bad consequences. The lesson of the strike must be learned!
Information