Cavalier Chetardie, “particular friend” of Elizaveta Petrovna

36
Cavalier Chetardie, “particular friend” of Elizaveta Petrovna

One of the most famous French diplomats in our country is Jacques-Joachim Trotti, Marquis de la Chetardie, whose life spanned the first half of the 18th century. This is due to his activities in St. Petersburg, where he played a large role in preparing the coup d’etat, after which power in the country was seized by the daughter of Peter I, Elizabeth.

Valentin Pikul wrote about Shetardy; he became the hero of several films and TV series. This, for example, is how viewers of the famous film “Midshipmen, Forward” (1987) saw him - a typical Frenchman, according to director S. Druzhinina:




She probably would have been happy to invite Boyarsky to play the role of Shetardy, but he was already involved in this film.

This is how the Marquis Chétardy appears before us in the TV series “Catherine” (2014), starring Patrick Roullier Rollin:


And here's what he really looked like:


At the same time, Chétardie can by no means be called a successful diplomat - he is, rather, a failure: his allies the Swedes lost the war, and he failed the main mission to destroy the alliance between Russia and Austria concluded in 1726.

We will talk about Shetardy in this article.

Marquis Chetardie before arriving in St. Petersburg


Jacques-Joachim Trotti de la Chetardie's father was an aristocrat from a "good family" of Italian origin. About the mother of the future diplomat, a representative of the ancient but already impoverished Languedoc family of Montale-Villebreuil, Saint-Simon wrote:

“Built like a goddess, tall, beautiful, stupid, but courteous, always causing a lot of talk about herself, very wasteful and very arrogant.”

The hero of the article was born on January 3, 1705. His father died before his birth, and his mother soon entered into a second marriage. Her chosen one was the Bavarian nobleman Monasterol, who quickly squandered his fortune and then shot himself, leaving the family with a lot of debt. The young Marquis de Chetardy began his service as a lieutenant in one of the royal regiments, rose to the rank of colonel, but soon chose a military career over a diplomatic one.

Before his appointment to St. Petersburg, he managed to visit London and Amsterdam, from 1731 to 1739 he represented his king in Berlin, where he earned a reputation as a deft diplomat and a witty interlocutor, capable of maintaining a pleasant conversation for everyone on any topic. There is a well-known letter from the heir to the Prussian throne (the future Frederick the Great), in which he joyfully informs his correspondent:

“The Marquis is coming next week, there will be something to treat himself to.”

Since, due to his duty, he had to deal with issues of succession to the vacant Polish throne, in Paris he began to be considered an expert in Russian affairs. In the War of the Polish Succession (1733–1735), Russia, Austria and Saxony became the opponents of France, Spain and the Kingdom of Sardinia.

It was then that Russian and French troops met in battle for the first time near Danzig, and this clash ended in the defeat of the French. Stanislav Leszczynski, the father-in-law of Louis XV, who claimed the Polish throne, was forced to flee. After the defeat in this war, the French finally paid close attention to the rapidly developing Russian state. The quintessence of what we saw can be considered the words of Louis XV:

“An alliance with Russia is necessary to make it more convenient to act against Russia... From within Russia itself, and to the detriment of Russia. I don’t like this country, about which we knew nothing for a long time, and when we found out, it suddenly became clear that this particular country was capable of disrupting the balance of all of Europe.”

Russia not only entered the arena of big European politics, but at the same time, as expected, found itself on the side of more prudent historical enemies of France, primarily Austria, but also Prussia and England. Prince Anton Ulrich, chosen as the husband of Anna Ioannovna's niece, was the nephew of the Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI and King George II of England, the brother of the famous Prussian commander Ferdinand of Brunswick.


Anna Leopoldovna and Anton Ulrich

The son of Anton Ulrich and Anna Leopoldovna was to become the Russian emperor.


Colonel of the Semyonovsky regiment John Antonovich on the engraving by L. Leopold, 1740

On the other hand, Russia was an opponent of the traditional allies of the French kingdom - Sweden, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Ottoman Empire. The system of “European balance” carefully built by the French was coming apart at the seams, and therefore it was decided to try to organize in our country, as they would say now, a “color revolution” - to replace the current rulers with French puppets. The most promising candidate seemed to be Princess Elizabeth, the daughter of Peter I and his favorite Martha Skavronskaya (not yet Catherine I).

The wedding of Peter and Catherine took place in 1712 - three years after the birth of Elizabeth. And therefore, both daughters of this couple - the eldest Anna and the younger Elizabeth were considered illegitimate, but were “crowned” during the coronation ceremony of Catherine in 1724 (they simply walked around the lectern with their mother).


Louis Caravaque. Portrait of Anna Petrovna and Elizaveta Petrovna, 1717

Elizabeth was known as a woman of very “free morals” and extremely frivolous; she was not interested in politics, and, as many in Paris thought, if she came to power she had to play the role of an obedient doll. The brilliant gentleman Marquis de Chetardy was sent to St. Petersburg to intrigue in favor of Elizabeth.

The first appearance of Chetardie in Russia


Shetardy went to St. Petersburg not alone, but with a very impressive retinue, which included 12 secretaries, 6 chaplains, 50 footmen and, most importantly, the famous chef Barido, who revealed the innermost secrets of French cuisine to the Russian aristocrats and became a real guru of the high art of gastronomy and serving. He made a large fortune from his consultations and supplies of necessary accessories (including artificial flowers for decorating dining tables).

He was also supported by a battery of 50 thousand bottles of champagne: it was thanks to Chétardie and Barideau that this drink displaced Hungarian wines from the St. Petersburg palaces and mansions, which until recently, under Catherine I, consumed up to a third of the empire’s budget. Since then, the money of Russian nobles began to enrich French winemakers.

In general, on the front of glamor and all kinds of show-off, Chetardie won a complete and unconditional victory. Things were much worse in the political direction.

The “German party” in St. Petersburg had very strong positions, and it was not going to give them up. However, as we know, Paris loves winners (Paris aime les vainqueurs, a phrase attributed to Henry IV). And Shetardy decided to take an active part in the promising pro-Elizabethan conspiracy, especially since there were very smart allies in St. Petersburg - the Swedish ambassador Eric Mathias Nolken and the physician Johann Hermann Lestok. And the regent Anna Leopoldovna, who was a very kind, trusting and criminally careless woman, decided to play giveaway with the conspirators.

But Elizabeth herself didn’t really want to occupy the Russian throne, because Anna Leopoldovna always treated her very well. So, in December 1740, in honor of the princess’s birthday, she paid off her debts for a huge amount of 40 thousand rubles, gave herself an expensive gold bracelet, and on behalf of the baby emperor - a snuff box decorated with diamonds.

Moreover, she ordered to find and return to St. Petersburg Elizabeth’s lover, Alexei Shubin, exiled to Kamchatka. Elizabeth did not have any political program that needed to be implemented, so there was no particular point in “getting into trouble” - after all, in case of failure, the best she could count on was exile to the provinces under strict supervision or tonsure in some a privileged monastery for noble people.

And therefore, Elizabeth Lestok had to be driven to the throne almost with a stick, and the Preobrazhenians had to carry it on their shoulders to seize power. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves and tell you about everything in order.

Conspiracy of ambassadors and Lestock


In Sweden, which had recently suffered defeat in the Northern War, revanchist sentiments, carefully supported by France, did not fade away. Two parties fought for influence at the royal court. Supporters of the first, who wanted to start a new war, were called “battle hats.” They contemptuously called their opponents from the “peace party” “nightcaps.”

The war party won, and in 1742 Sweden began the so-called “Russian War of Hat” - hattarnas ryska krig. The Swedes then demanded a revision of the terms of the Nystadt Peace and the return of the Baltic lands. The Russian troops were commanded by the Irishman Peter Lassi. He arrived in Russia under Peter I, and his first battle was the unfortunate battle of Narva.

Later, Lassi served well and honestly received ranks and awards. However, his finest hour came during the reign of Anna Ioannovna, when in the war against the Ottoman Empire, with his victories, he and Minich washed away the shame of the Prut campaign of Peter I. The “War of the Hat” took place in Finland, the Swedes suffered defeat after defeat and, despairing of defeating the Russians at Vyborg or Gelsinfors, decided to strike Russia in St. Petersburg.

They considered Elizabeth the weak link. A special manifesto stated that Sweden was the defender of the rights of the daughter of Peter the Great. And the Swedes accused Anna Leopoldovna’s government of “foreign oppression and inhuman tyranny... of the Russian nation.”

The Swedish envoy Erik Mathias Nolcken and the French ambassador Chétardy came into contact with Elizabeth, who, in exchange for financial subsidies, willingly agreed to satisfy all their demands.

Looking ahead, let's say that after Russia's victory in 1743, Elizabeth retracted her words - because the winners in St. Petersburg were loved no less than in Paris, and the vanquished were no less despised. And not a single politician in the world, being in his right mind, fulfills promises made to the losing side.

The liaison between the ambassadors and Elizabeth was the princess’s personal physician, Johann Herman (Armand) Lestocq, who in Shetardie’s reports was described as an agent “brave friend” and himself received a “pension” of 15 thousand livres from the French treasury.

Very soon all the threads of the conspiracy were in Lestocq's hands. It was he who made this princess empress - and then went into exile for 13 years: both male and female monarchs “know how to be grateful.”


G.K. Groot. Portrait of Johann Hermann Lestock

Lestocq came from a family of French Protestants who emigrated to Hanover. Here his father received the position of court surgeon under the local duke. The salary was small, the family could not afford to educate his son at the university, and therefore the father himself taught the future conspirator in medical sciences.

For some time, Lestocq served as a surgeon in one of the French regiments, and in 1713 he offered his services to the agents of Peter I, who were recruiting specialists in Europe to work in Russia. Lestok knew how to please people, and in 1716–1717. was among the people who accompanied Peter I and Catherine on their journey through Europe. During this trip, he became friends with Pavel Yaguzhinsky and the court marshal Dmitry Shepelev.

Lestocq's court career ended in April 1719 after a conflict with the Tsar's favorite jester Lacoste (Jan d'Acosta, it was Peter who gave him the deserted Sommers Island in the Gulf of Finland, and with it the jester title of "Samoyed King"). The tsar sided with Lacoste, and Lestocq was sent into exile - though not to Siberia, but to Kazan. He returned to St. Petersburg after Catherine I ascended the throne.

The new empress appointed him as personal physician to her daughter Elizabeth. Having become closely acquainted with this frivolous princess, Lestoc realized that she would not achieve anything with her own mind, she needed to take her affairs into her own hands. It was he who wrote a denunciation against Elizabeth’s lover Alexei Shubin, mentioned above, because he believed that this relationship was harmful to the princess.

In fact, is it proper for the Grand Duchess to write such poetry to some ensign, even from the Semenovsky regiment?

“I can’t put out the fire in my own urine.
My heart aches, but what can I do to help?
That it’s always apart and boring without you.
It would be better not to know you, than to always suffer like this for you.”

Lestok at this time had a reputation as a useful (but also dangerous) man with his wit. It is known that with his witticisms that quickly spread in the world, he (not without compensation) acted in favor of the Bestuzhev clan, Artemy Volynsky and even Princess Anna, Elizabeth’s sister. There is a letter from Anna Petrovna in which she asks Elizabeth:

“Perhaps, give my slavish (!) bow to Lestoc and thank him for the encouragement of his mercy, and also ask him if he talks so much about Grishka and Marfushka.”

Shetardy arrived in Russia after the death of Anna Ioannovna and the arrest of Biron. The Swedish envoy Nolken at this time was looking for an opportunity to strike the Russian army from St. Petersburg - it was he who first established contact with Elizabeth.

Shetardy quickly joined in the intrigue. And Lestocq decided that the time had come for decisive action: his ward was to become the Russian empress. Moreover, the resignation of Field Marshal Minich weakened Anna Leopoldovna’s position in the guards regiments, and the cheerful and generous Princess Elizabeth was very popular in them. However, the preparation of the conspiracy was noticed by people loyal to Anna, who made desperate attempts to save both her and the young emperor.

Anna was warned by the experienced politician Osterman, who received information about the conspiracy from English agents in St. Petersburg. Moritz Linard, the regent's favorite man, strongly advised that Elizabeth be sent to a monastery and the Chetardies expelled from the country. The Austrian envoy Marquis de Bott wrote to her:

“You are on the edge of an abyss. For God's sake, save yourself, save the emperor."

Chief Marshal Reinhold Gustav Löwenwolde handed over a note warning of a conspiracy in favor of Elizabeth. After reading it, Anna said:

“Ask Count Lowenwolde if he has gone mad? All this is empty gossip, I myself know better than anyone that we have nothing to fear from princesses.

She directly forbade her Generalissimo husband, who also received warnings from all sides about the conspiracy, to set up pickets in the streets, declaring that she did not see any threat.

Finally, a Russian agent in Silesia sent a letter detailing the plot and the role Lestocq played in it. After reading it, on November 23, 1741, Anna Leopoldovna nevertheless decided to talk to Elizabeth. She didn’t understand people well, and the princess easily managed to convince her of her innocence.

The regent also additionally played along with the conspirators, literally the next day after the conversation with Elizabeth (November 24, 1741) she gave the order to the guard regiments of St. Petersburg to prepare for the march to Finland. And these were no longer the veterans of Peter I, but the depraved “janissaries”, who in the capital were mainly engaged in brawls and revelry. They didn’t want to fight, and therefore they were ready to support anyone - just not to leave St. Petersburg with its cozy brothels and taverns. And the entire first company of the Preobrazhensky Regiment had long been fed by Elizabeth with Swedish and French money.

Lestocq believed that there was no time to hesitate; there was no time to coordinate actions with Shetardy and Nolken; he decided to act independently. However, Elizabeth hesitated and could not make a decision.

And then Lestok brought the princess a drawing he had personally written, in which she was depicted as a lady on a playing card. On one side, Elizabeth sat with a scepter in her hand and a crown on her head, and he himself with St. Andrew’s ribbon on the steps of the throne. On the other hand, the princess was depicted with a shorn head (a hint of a monastery), and he was depicted on a wheel. The inscription on the painting read:

“Today is this or tomorrow is something else.”

Elizabeth gave up and relied on her doctor for everything.

In the next article we will continue our story, talk about the “night strike” of Johann Lestocq and the further fate of the gentleman Chetardie.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    5 February 2024 05: 52
    He was also supported by a battery of 50 thousand bottles of champagne
    And the historian K. Valishevsky counted 16 bottles as part of his diplomatic luggage..
    1. +6
      5 February 2024 06: 32
      Quote: parusnik
      He was also supported by a battery of 50 thousand bottles of champagne
      And the historian K. Valishevsky counted 16 bottles as part of his diplomatic luggage..

      The road from Paris is not close, it’s shrinking and all that, and then there’s glass containers…. drinks
      Good morning Alexey!
      Thank you Valery for this morning’s article, comrades, have a successful day!
      1. +4
        5 February 2024 06: 40
        Good morning!
        shrinkage and all that, and then there’s glass containers...
        Do you think the wine reproduced itself? They took 16 with them, but brought 800? Did you buy containers along the way? I immediately remember the movie “Bluff”, for which Felix was imprisoned.. smile
        1. +6
          5 February 2024 07: 35
          What bothers you? Suppose we loaded 50 thousand bottles in Paris, but
          The road from Paris is not close
          , offering Chétardy and his people Polish swill is just an insult,
          shrinkage and all that, and then there’s glass containers

          In St. Petersburg they counted 16800 bottles.
          1. +2
            5 February 2024 07: 43
            Quote: vet
            What bothers you? Suppose we loaded 50 thousand bottles in Paris, but
            The road from Paris is not close
            , offering Chétardy and his people Polish swill is just an insult,
            shrinkage and all that, and then there’s glass containers

            In St. Petersburg they counted 16800 bottles.

            That is, 33200 (thirty-three thousand two hundred) bottles were drunk along the way? Wow...
            1. +5
              5 February 2024 08: 47
              Apparently, gifts along the way should also be included in the “shrinkage”: one elector received half a thousand bottles, another, a third, and we also met hospitable bishops along the way.
            2. +4
              5 February 2024 11: 10
              Quote from Kojote21
              That is, 33200 (thirty-three thousand two hundred) bottles were drunk along the way? Wow...

          2. +1
            5 February 2024 07: 50
            Quote: vet
            offer Chétardie and his men Polish swill

            Why didn’t they think of drinking German swill? In the same Bavaria? Didn't you realize? request
            1. +4
              5 February 2024 08: 48
              Not the entire road passed through Bavaria. And even there in roadside taverns it’s unlikely that they bothered too much with quality
      2. +5
        5 February 2024 07: 03
        Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
        Quote: parusnik
        He was also supported by a battery of 50 thousand bottles of champagne
        And the historian K. Valishevsky counted 16 bottles as part of his diplomatic luggage..

        The road from Paris is not close, it’s shrinking and all that, and then there’s glass containers…. drinks
        Good morning Alexey!
        Thank you Valery for this morning’s article, comrades, have a successful day!

        Good morning Vlad! hi
        Same to you!

        Thank you very much Valery for the article, I look forward to the continuation! hi
  2. +4
    5 February 2024 05: 58
    The main thing when remembering Elizabeth is not to forget about the dresses and the fact that she did not believe that England was an island, well, in general, re-read Pikul again.
    It was sarcasm.
    1. +4
      5 February 2024 06: 40
      Quote: Cartalon
      The main thing when remembering Elizabeth is not to forget about the dresses and the fact that she did not believe that England was an island, well, in general, re-read Pikul again.
      It was sarcasm.

      She was not prepared to become an empress...
      1. +3
        5 February 2024 06: 52
        She was being prepared for the crown of France and she was well educated, at least she knew Latin
        1. +4
          5 February 2024 07: 01
          Quote: Cartalon
          She was being prepared for the crown of France and she was well educated, at least she knew Latin

          What am I talking about? About the fact that she was not prepared for this, so that she becomes the Russian empress.
        2. VLR
          +4
          5 February 2024 09: 30
          she was well educated

          It is impossible to say the same about Elizabeth. The character is not the same and the abilities are not the same. Yes, and she was not required to conduct intelligent conversations in social salons; they expected that in bed she would whisper the necessary words in the king’s ear and try to raise the heir in a pro-Russian spirit. Her sister Anna (mother of Peter III), who died early, was smart. Under Peter II, she was a member of the Supreme Privy Council! But after the representative of another branch of the Romanov dynasty, Anna Ioannovna, came to power, her husband, the Duke of Holstein, was strongly “advised” to go to Kiel as quickly as possible.
          1. +1
            5 February 2024 10: 10
            Well, knowing at least 5 languages ​​clearly speaks of Elizabeth’s stupidity, I tell you again, write novels about misfits, you will do great, A historian must be objective or at least pretend to be, this is not required of a fantasy writer.
            1. VLR
              +5
              5 February 2024 10: 18
              And you read what foreign contemporaries write about Elizabeth. For example, the same Chetardy:
              “Elizabeth needs peace only in order to use money for her pleasures, and not for war, her main desire is to change four dresses in a day, and therefore see admiration and servility around her. The thought of the slightest activity frightens and angers her.”

              But more on that in the next article.
              “Elizabeth was a cheerful queen, she sings and has fun, but there is no order”
              - this is a general opinion expressed back in the 19th century by A.K. Tolstoy, and no one was indignant or accused the poet of slander.
              Some knowledge of languages ​​was drilled into Elizabeth, but it did not add intelligence and did not correct her frivolous character. .
              1. +8
                5 February 2024 12: 20
                Quote: VlR
                what foreign contemporaries write about Elizabeth. For example, the same Chetardie:

                Valery, excuse me, but did he write this before he was kicked out of Russia or after? feel
                Quote: VlR
                but it didn’t make me any smarter

                Well, she definitely wasn’t a fool. And she knew how to surround herself with smart workers. Or at least don't push me away
                Quote: VlR
                frivolous character

                Everything was fine there with the character. Elizabeth, for all her shortcomings, understood people and did not suffer from slobbering. Remember the fate of the same Lestocq or those involved in the “women’s revolt”. Out of tongue, whip and exile to the shores of the Pacific Ocean. It's okay that we're talking about ladies.
                1. VLR
                  +4
                  5 February 2024 12: 25
                  what foreign contemporaries write about Elizabeth. For example, the same Chetardie:

                  Valery, excuse me, but did he write this before he was kicked out of Russia or after?

                  This is from a letter from Chetardy to Paris during his second stay in St. Petersburg. And there were others similar. It was on such letters that Bestuzhev-Ryumin, who organized the “black office,” caught him - as many as 69 sheets with Elizabeth’s “characteristics” were collected and provided to her. But more on that in the next article.
                  As for “she understood people” - the fact that for 16 years under Elizabeth the drunkard and bribe-taker Bestuzhev-Ryumin ruled the country with his completely failed “system of Peter the Great” completely refutes this thesis.
                  1. +4
                    5 February 2024 13: 37
                    Quote: VlR
                    This is from a letter from Chetardy to Paris during his second stay in St. Petersburg.

                    That is, after the first failure and immediately before the second....
                    Sorry, but this characterizes not so much Elizabeth as Chétardie himself)))
                    Quote: VlR
                    As for “she understood people” - the fact that for 16 years under Elizabeth the drunkard and bribe-taker Bestuzhev-Ryumin ruled the country with his completely failed “system of Peter the Great” completely refutes this thesis.

                    You are simply partial to Bestuzhev)
                    but besides him there were the Shuvalov brothers, Razumovsky
                    Quote: VlR
                    This is not statesmanship, but fear and cruelty.

                    It’s a strange thing, when you like someone, you instantly find this very “statesman”, although there is no smell of him there. When it’s the other way around, you can’t see it point blank))) But, in general, when I remembered the “Woman’s Revolt” I had something completely different in mind
                    This is an indicator of having character and the ability to act when necessary. What was completely missing from Anna Leopoldovna, whom you so valued))
                    1. VLR
                      +1
                      7 February 2024 09: 09
                      That is, after the first failure and immediately before the second....

                      There was no first failure: on the contrary, success and triumph, Chetardie left for Paris, favored by Elizabeth who had come to power
                      1. +1
                        7 February 2024 10: 47
                        Quote: VlR
                        There was no first failure after all.

                        That is, Sweden returned what was lost in the Nystad Peace?
                        I really didn't know...
                        Quote: VlR
                        Chetardie left for Paris, favored by Elizabeth who came to power

                        Did de Fleury send him for this?
                        Valery, let's get straight to it. Chetardie was a failure, and therefore his value judgments should be treated with some caution
                      2. VLR
                        +1
                        7 February 2024 10: 58
                        At the very beginning of the article I called Shetardy a loser. But his first trip to St. Petersburg ended simply brilliantly for him personally. By the way, he tried to help the Swedes and negotiated a truce for them, but they themselves violated it a month later, so it’s their own fault, Chetardy has nothing to do with it
                      3. +1
                        7 February 2024 11: 09
                        Quote: VlR
                        At the very beginning of the article I called Shetardy a loser.

                        But at the same time they did not hesitate to refer to his opinion about Elizabeth... feel
                        Quote: VlR
                        But his first trip to St. Petersburg ended simply brilliantly for him personally.

                        Stop! stop And what is his merit in this?
                        The coup actually happened without his participation. But Elizabeth wanted friendship with France and generously distributed advances.
                        And then, one should not confuse personal sheep with state ones (Prisoner of the Caucasus). For him this is luck, but for the task entrusted to him, what?
                        And with such a benevolent attitude of the empress, he (okay, not he alone) the Franks managed to bring the relationship to a break. Bravo!
                        Again, the Swedes violated the truce, they didn’t violate it... No one would return the Baltic states to them!
                2. VLR
                  +3
                  5 February 2024 12: 45
                  Out of tongue, whip and exile to the shores of the Pacific Ocean. Even though we are talking about ladies.

                  This is not statesmanship, but fear and cruelty. Elizabeth was so afraid of a new conspiracy that she tried not to sleep in the same room twice in a row. And in general she was afraid to sleep at night - hence her endless balls that lasted until the morning.
        3. +4
          5 February 2024 10: 12
          Quote: Cartalon
          she was well educated, at least she knew Latin

          She knew French for sure. Actually, the gallomania of the Russian aristocracy began precisely with her.
          And so... well, taking into account the fact that women at that time were often not given education at all feel
    2. VLR
      +3
      5 February 2024 09: 12
      We simply won’t have time to get to the testimony of academician Jacob Shtelin (Elizabeth left behind about 15 thousand dresses, 2 chests of silk stockings and more than 25 thousand pairs of shoes) - the story about Shetardie will end.
  3. +5
    5 February 2024 07: 32
    the winners in St. Petersburg were loved no less than in Paris, and the vanquished were no less despised.

    I remember the promises of non-expansion of NATO to the east, which the “partners” forgot about immediately after Yeltsin and the gop company drunkenly destroyed the USSR
    1. +3
      5 February 2024 07: 38
      Quote: vet
      the winners in St. Petersburg were loved no less than in Paris, and the vanquished were no less despised.

      I remember the promises of non-expansion of NATO to the east, which the “partners” forgot about immediately after Yeltsin and the gop company drunkenly destroyed the USSR

      No matter how regrettable it may be, promising does not mean fulfilling...
    2. +2
      5 February 2024 09: 57
      ...if I were drunk...
      Such countries, either drunk or “somehow by accident,” do not fall apart...
  4. +6
    5 February 2024 07: 52
    An excellent article, the only thing missing from it is midshipmen. And Chetardie, who is not particularly remembered in the history of France, is not even named after the port taverns, let alone the streets.
  5. +8
    5 February 2024 10: 08
    Valery, did you yourself understand what you wrote?)))
    and that's why it was decided to try to organize in our country, as they would say now, a “color revolution” – replace the current rulers with French puppets. The most promising candidate seemed to be Princess Elizabeth, the daughter of Peter I and his favorite Martha Skavronskaya (not yet Catherine I).

    Do you want to say that the desire to place little Lisa on the throne appeared during Peter’s lifetime? lol
    Very soon all the threads of the conspiracy were in Lestocq's hands. It was he who made this princess empress - and then went into exile for 13 years: both male and female monarchs “know how to be grateful.”

    Everything seems to be so, but there is a small nuance.
    Lestok received every rank and honor conceivable for his position. Count title (Holy Roman Empire). Position of life physician and director of the Medical Office. The rank of actual privy councilor, etc. and so on.
    But he didn’t even think about calming down and continued to intrigue. He received support not only from the Franks, but also from the Prussians. In 1744, Bestuzhev firmly besieged him, but Elizabeth, remembering her previous merits, pardoned the former physician. But, as they say in Mother Rus', hunchbacks are corrected with graves. And Jean Armand threw himself into a new conspiracy... with a slightly predictable result.
    In general, “later” is almost nine years of continuous intrigue. So who is his doctor?
    1. ANB
      +2
      5 February 2024 20: 55
      . daughters of Peter I and his favorite Martha Skavronskaya (not yet Catherine I).

      I will stand up for the author. I think what this phrase means is that moment of birth Elizabeth, Martha was not yet Catherine the first. And she wasn’t Peter’s wife yet.
      1. VLR
        +2
        5 February 2024 21: 25
        at the time of Elizabeth's birth, Martha was not yet Catherine the first. And she wasn’t Peter’s wife yet

        That’s right, it’s even strange that someone could understand otherwise. Martha was already Catherine (she was baptized), but in the eyes of everyone around her she remained an ordinary mistress with illegitimate daughters. She officially married Peter in 1712. And she was crowned only in 1724, which Peter immediately regretted, since her relationship with Willem Mons was revealed. Forgave shortly before his death.
        1. ANB
          +3
          5 February 2024 21: 46
          If I write code documentation myself, I give it to someone else to read. And if it is not clear, then I add clarification phrases to the text. Sometimes it happens that everything seems to be clear to you, because it’s on topic. But not so much for the other person.
      2. +1
        6 February 2024 11: 16
        Quote: ANB
        I think this phrase means that at the time of Elizabeth’s birth, Martha was not yet Catherine the first

        From the above passage this is not at all obvious)))
        In any case, when de Fleury came up with this combination, Elizabeth was quite a princess and even one of the contenders for his king’s wife. Daughter of the king and queen.