"Izvestia" summer 1919

37
"Izvestia" summer 1919


“You poke into the White, you poke into the Black, into the Caspian, into the Baltic,
- wherever the ship goes, the end of the ride.
Stands the mistress of the seas, bulldog Britain.
From all ends of the blockade the ring and the guns are staring us in the face.”

"Fine". V. Mayakovsky

Unknown Wars. We continue to publish materials from the “Unknown Wars” series, and today we continue the topic: the events of the summer of 1919 in the materials of the Izvestia newspaper. The newspaper was very large in format, and it contained a lot of information. However, certain thematic areas in it were constant. In particular, the section “Latest News”, in which they published news from all over the country and from abroad, which were received by telegraph.




And here are the events of June 14-15, for example, that the Izvestia newspaper wrote about:


And this is already news from August...


These short information blocks should also be classified as news. We received them through ROSTA (Russian Telegraph Agency under the All-Russian Central Executive Committee)

From the very beginning of the civil war in Russia, a section “In the camp of the counter-revolution” appeared in Izvestia, and it was regularly updated with news.


Material from June 1, 1919


Beginning of August. But such materials were published in almost every issue of this newspaper.


Truly, newspapers must be read! Not in any textbooks stories I have not seen any mention of someone throwing a bomb at Ataman Semyonov. But it turns out they abandoned...


The message about the battles for Ufa directly visibly echoes the second episode of the film “Red Square” (1970), in my opinion, perhaps the best Soviet film about the Civil War. In one of the reviews I read that this is “a masterpiece out of tune with its era", and we can completely agree with this!


Very interesting material that explains why in the Civil War, despite all their efforts, the whites were not destined to defeat the reds. The whole question was about the land and the old and new relationship to it...

But on the Don the Reds had serious problems with the Cossacks. The fact is that the Cossacks en masse supported the anti-Bolshevik forces. And it is clear that the most severe measures were taken against him. The policy of the Soviet government towards the Cossacks was reflected in a secret circular letter from the Organizing Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) to the party organizations of the Don and the Urals dated January 24, 1919, according to which it was assumed

“to carry out merciless mass terror against all Cossacks who took any direct or indirect part in the fight against Soviet power.”

And with regard to the rich Cossacks, their total destruction was planned. And the vagueness of the main wording of the document made it possible to interpret it very broadly, which, among other things, also opened the way to settling personal scores. It was assumed that there would be an equalization of Cossacks and non-residents and a mass resettlement of the peasant poor from Central Russia to Cossack lands. That is, it was a policy of forced de-Cossackization, which naturally pushed most of the Cossacks into the arms of the White Guards.


A large article was published in Izvestia about the difficult situation on the Don. Part 1

On March 16, 1919, at the plenum of the Central Committee of the RCP (b), they nevertheless decided to suspend this resolution, but it had already fallen into the hands of the whites. It was published in the White Guard press in April 1919, and needless to say how much it helped discredit the Soviet order and caused a massive influx of Cossacks into the White Army.


Part 2

Moreover, despite the decision of the Central Committee of the RCP (b), the Don Bureau of the RCP (b) continued the previous terrorist line. Thus, in the decision of the Donburo of April 21, 1919 it was stated that “the existence of the Don Cossacks... faces the proletarian government with the constant threat of counter-revolutionary actions", What

“poses as an urgent task the question of the complete, rapid and decisive destruction of the Cossacks as a special everyday economic group, the destruction of their economic foundations, the physical destruction of the Cossack officials and officers, in general all the top of the Cossacks, actively counter-revolutionary, the dispersion and neutralization of ordinary Cossacks and the formal liquidation of the Cossacks. »

It got to the point that in some places even the word “Cossack” itself was prohibited from being spoken out loud!


Part 3

True, there were those among the Bolsheviks who understood the futility of such actions. In particular, V. A. Antonov-Ovseenko wrote on July 18, 1919 in his letter to the Central Committee:

“You did not take into account the full strength of the Cossack traditions on the Don and Kuban. You decided to go ahead. Comrade [H.G.] Rakovsky told me that you decided to eradicate the Cossacks, introducing the poor from the center to the Cossack lands, destroying every shadow of Cossack privileges. You did not take into account the balance of forces, you did not try to reach an agreement with the working Cossacks. You sent your armies on a campaign under a banner that caused an almost universal uprising against us on the Don and an almost universal rise of the Kuban people. This is the main reason for our temporary defeat in the south, and this reason was created by you.”

And all this happened, by the way, because of excessive haste. There was no need to rush into exterminating the Cossacks. They would not have left it anywhere after the final victory of Soviet power. It is not without reason that it is said that in all matters one must hurry slowly. But in this case this wise rule was forgotten.


Therefore, it is no wonder that the Cossacks dealt very cruelly with the communists who fell into their hands, since it was in them that they saw the cause of all their troubles

Readers of VO once complained that in this series little was written “about the atrocities of the whites,” but in fact, until the summer of 1919, although they actually wrote about them, but... less than now. And then one material after another began to appear.


Here is one of the materials on this topic. It is not clear why those flogged with rods were smeared with sour milk. Maybe some of the VO readers know? I would understand if they were then sprinkled with salt, as the ancient Egyptians did. But sour milk... it’s unclear


Here is another ROSTA material on the same topic...


And further…


And monuments were erected to the workers who died at the hands of the Czechoslovaks and speeches were given at the same time

Also in the summer of 1919, Izvestia published a large amount of material about kulaks, and placed it in the “Controversy” section. Like, the editors don’t agree with the author on everything, but let him speak out.


The whole thing didn’t even fit into the lens... But in general, you can understand what this material is talking about


Continuation of the material about fists


But this is extremely interesting material, compiled on the basis of peasant letters to the newspaper. By the way, one of the cornerstones of PR is feedback from the audience in order to take their interests into account in a timely and correct manner!


And these are “peasant letters”. It’s very interesting what’s written here about the middle peasant Mikhailov...


Continuation of the material about the middle peasant Mikhailov...


Well, this is a note based on Kaganovich’s report about how peasants are deceiving their native Soviet power. Moreover, the peasants seem to be loyal to her. And what? They got the land, what more could they want? Free travel abroad? Ha ha!


In addition to external enemies, Soviet Russia had a lot of enemies within. And they constantly conspired, which Izvestia also reported...


One of these conspiracies ended in a mutiny at the Krasnaya Gorka fort. What the newspaper reported in its article dated June 17. However, there is very little information about this historical fact in the newspaper. Therefore, we will try to cover this event in as much detail as possible in a special material, which is currently being prepared by one of the readers and authors of our site

To be continued ...
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    23 January 2024 03: 19
    It was a cruel time...
    1. +1
      23 January 2024 06: 12
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      It was a cruel time...

      Yes, really... Bagritsky noticed great: the soldier kills, the raven eats the free meat lying on the ground, a source of possible infections.
      1. +2
        23 January 2024 13: 29
        Quote: kalibr
        great Bagritsky noticed: the soldier kills, the raven eats the free meat lying on the ground

        Bagritsky’s train of thought is difficult to understand....... a commonwealth arises, a crow with a fighter,Well, then a new life, according to Bagritsky, rises from the bloody earth, from the bones. And, understand here as you want.
        The Civil War, of course, put the brains of many on one side, both red and white, and poets.
  2. +4
    23 January 2024 04: 50
    About the Cossacks. I wonder how Sholokhov would have portrayed the Cossacks and, accordingly, the Bolsheviks, if the Bolsheviks had lost in the struggle for Soviet power? I understand - if only ... but the call and need to write is in the writer’s genes and he cannot refuse it by any means ...
    About "Izvestia" of 1919. In 1919, Izvestia was no longer the newspaper of the Petrograd Central Executive Committee and the Council of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies, but Izvestia of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of the Council of Peasants, Workers, Soldiers and Cossacks' Deputies. The Cossacks were still privileged as a separate class. And what happened to these Cossacks, but after 25 years they were already enthusiastically reading their own newspapers, for example, “Bulletin of the Cossacks” with the preamble - “We, the Cossacks, place ourselves and all our forces at the disposal of the Fuhrer to fight against our common enemy and etc.
    How Russia survived these difficult times is simply incomprehensible!
    1. +10
      23 January 2024 05: 50
      Do you think that if the Whites had won, Sholokhov would have been able to write something complimentary about the Bolsheviks? In any case, he might have been able to show his talent by writing his work, but only with the presence of the image of the Bolsheviks as villains. If the Whites had won, the terror could have been worse than Stalin’s repression, the age-old hatred of the rich for those who encroached on their property is known; there is ample evidence of this; just look at what the haves did after suppressing certain uprisings of the have-nots in various periods of the historical process.
    2. +5
      23 January 2024 09: 32
      Sholokhov, if the Whites had won, he would not have written anything... From the word at all...
      1. +5
        23 January 2024 10: 04
        Quote: kor1vet1974
        Sholokhov, if the Whites had won, he would not have written anything... From the word at all...

        I absolutely agree.
        He would have been a clerk for some rich man in Kuban (at best) or become an alcoholic very quickly (at worst).
        1. +3
          23 January 2024 13: 35
          Sholokhov, when registering at the labor exchange, was asked: profession? Answered: machine gunner...They would chop them down with swords or shoot them or hang them
    3. +1
      24 January 2024 01: 24
      but the call and need to write is in the writer’s genes and he can’t refuse it by any means...

      Your hint is understood... wink
  3. +5
    23 January 2024 08: 46
    Very interesting material that explains why in the Civil War, despite all their efforts, the whites were not destined to defeat the reds. The whole question was about the land and the old and new relationship to it...

    And the author of this material is no less interesting - Alexander Grigorievich Goykhbarg, professor at Moscow State University and author of the Civil Code of the RSFSR of 1922. He also translated Kautsky’s works into Russian, including his correspondence with Engels, which Sharikov read.
    This... what's her name... correspondence between Engels and this... what's his name - the devil... with Kautsky
  4. +6
    23 January 2024 10: 32
    The material is interesting, but for understanding the essence of that time it is somewhat one-sided in the sense that there is nothing to compare with. Requires printing on the white side. At least the materials of the same Investigative Commission. Therefore, the presentation of material by the Reds can hardly be considered completely truthful. The Reds clearly outplayed the Whites in terms of agitation and propaganda.
    For those who are interested in the topic, I can suggest *Red Terror during the Civil War. Based on materials from the Special Investigative Commission to investigate the atrocities of the Bolsheviks* Moscow, Terra-Book Club, 2004.
    The collection *Red Terror through the eyes of eyewitnesses* Moscow, Iris-Press, 2009 is very interesting to study.
    And by the way... In *Essays on the Russian Time of Troubles* A.I. Denikin has a whole section called *The moral character of the army. Black pages*
    ...The armies gradually became mired in big and small sins, which cast a thick shadow on the bright appearance of the liberation movement...
    I think studying the issue from both sides will give a more truthful picture of those events.
    1. +7
      23 January 2024 13: 35
      [quote=Alexander Kuksin]
      Alexander! The purpose of the cycle was announced in the first material and it does not aim to compare anything with anything. The goal is to show what information about the events of the Civil War our fellow citizens in the past and all could have received from the Izvestia newspaper. I do not have access to White Guard newspapers.
      1. 0
        23 January 2024 23: 43
        Melgunov also collected excerpts from Soviet newspapers! ;))
        1. 0
          24 January 2024 07: 56
          Quote: Alexander Kuksin
          Melgunov also collected excerpts from Soviet newspapers!

          Alexander! I don't collect clippings. I read them. That's why the series is moving slowly. To also have a general idea. And individual scans for VO are “squeezes”. The most typical.
    2. +1
      24 January 2024 15: 23
      Quote: Alexander Kuksin
      The material is interesting, but for understanding the essence of that time it is somewhat one-sided in the sense that there is nothing to compare with. Requires printing on the white side. At least the materials of the same Investigative Commission. Therefore, the presentation of material by the Reds can hardly be considered completely truthful. The Reds clearly outplayed the Whites in terms of agitation and propaganda.
      For those who are interested in the topic, I can suggest *Red Terror during the Civil War.


      You can open M. Gorky’s article “On the Russian Peasantry,” published in Berlin in 1922. It’s about both the Reds and the Whites. You can also open "Taras Bulba" - Gogol.
      But what do you mean by the word “essence”? Atrocities on both sides are not the “essence” at all, simply because they are a consequence of the mores of a society in which both the ancestors of the whites and the ancestors of the reds lived for centuries. It couldn't have been any other way.

      But if the “essence” is the logic of events, then you need to read about the December 1917 Paris Conference of the Entente countries, at which Russia was divided into zones of responsibility and funding was opened for the creation of governments and armies fighting against the RSFSR. The essence is as simple as an orange: all white armies were formed in territories occupied either by the Entente or Germany and its allies.
      1. 0
        24 January 2024 18: 23
        1. Of course, there were atrocities on both sides, but only the Reds introduced this into state policy.
        2. It was also the case that the Entente countries divided the country into zones of responsibility. But the point is, there were interventionists on both sides in approximately equal numbers. Only the Reds called them international divisions. And the Entente never engaged in formations of white armies. Especially in the territories of Russia. By and large, the Entente did not benefit from victory, both Red and White. That’s why she helped both the Reds and the Whites.
        As an example... The failure of Yudenich's attack on Petrograd had various reasons. But one of them was that the Bolsheviks asked Germany to use captured German artillerymen and Germany agreed.
        In general, work with the material *Meeting on the Princes' Islands*. They reflect the role of the Entente very well. It's on the Internet.
  5. -1
    23 January 2024 12: 12
    As they said in the USSR, there are two main newspapers, Izvestia and Pravda. Only there was no truth in Izvestia, and no news in Pravda!
    1. +2
      23 January 2024 12: 53
      I heard another joke from the times of the USSR.

      Announcement at the Soyuzpechat kiosk.
      There is no truth, Soviet Russia has been sold, only Labor remains.
      1. BAI
        +2
        23 January 2024 12: 59
        only Labor left

        for 3 kopecks
        1. +1
          24 January 2024 10: 22
          Let me clarify. For 2 kopecks. The newspaper Trud cost 2 kopecks. Pravda cost 3 kopecks
      2. +2
        23 January 2024 13: 39
        Soviet Russia sold
        Full version.. There is no truth and there never will be, Soviet Russia is sold, what remains is Labor for 3 kopecks.. And what is actually wrong with this joke? And it is currently relevant...
        1. 0
          24 January 2024 23: 30
          The full version begins: “Today there is news? There is no news. Okay, there is truth.. (hereinafter in the text).
    2. +3
      23 January 2024 13: 41
      And now, they say, the following: there are no factories, no enterprises, just continuous television...
      1. +1
        24 January 2024 07: 38
        “And now, they say, the next thing is, there are no factories, no enterprises, just continuous television..”

        Well, that’s what they said then too.

        - When will communism come?
        - When the TV is connected to the refrigerator.
    3. +1
      23 January 2024 14: 37
      Quote: RusGr
      Only there was no truth in Izvestia, and no news in Pravda!

      And if Napoleon had the newspaper Pravda, then no one would have known about Waterloo wink
      1. +3
        23 January 2024 17: 04
        “And if Napoleon had the newspaper Pravda, then no one would have known about Waterloo.”

        Napoleon worked well with the press and no one from the press found out about Waterloo. He closed several dozen newspapers (or even hundreds), leaving only 4. I think I took this from Tarle.

        The guards fled near Waterloo, it was all over...
        1. +1
          23 January 2024 18: 32
          Quote: S.Z.
          "And if Napoleon had the newspaper Pravda,

          This is a quote from an old Soviet joke wink
    4. 0
      24 January 2024 21: 47
      Quote: RusGr
      Only there was no truth in Izvestia, and no news in Pravda!

      When I read messages in Pravda about the war in Vietnam, Cambodia, and the Middle East, based on the article I could immediately draw a conclusion about the state of affairs. Now, when I read reports after 1991 from the war in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Ukraine, and Gaza, it is very difficult to understand even where the front line is and where it is moving. Although acquaintances who had sources of information in Afghanistan already six months before the US withdrawal from Afghanistan assured that the police, border service and customs were actually openly subordinate to the Taliban and carried out their duties only with the permission of the Taliban, that is, the collapse of state power had already occurred. That is, the level of information for the common man in Pravda was much higher than it is now in the mass media.
  6. +4
    23 January 2024 12: 55
    Judging by the information, there was more freedom of speech in 1919 than today, but less propaganda.
    1. +5
      23 January 2024 13: 16
      Quote: S.Z.
      Judging by the information, there was more freedom of speech in 1919 than today, but less propaganda.

      Surprisingly, yes, it happened! You noticed correctly.
    2. 0
      23 January 2024 13: 49
      That year didn't last long.... Then it ended with strict censorship of the party's power!
      1. +3
        23 January 2024 14: 06
        Quote: RusGr
        Then it ended with strict censorship of the party power!

        But not before 1929, although, yes, they were moving towards this. But gradually.
        1. +3
          23 January 2024 17: 05
          Now too - gradually.
  7. +4
    23 January 2024 13: 59
    As comrade said later in 19. Stalin, “we can have two parties in our country, one in power, the other in prison!”
  8. ANB
    +1
    23 January 2024 22: 00
    . mutiny at Fort Krasnaya Gorka. What the newspaper reported in its article dated June 17. However, there is very little information about this historical fact in the newspaper. Therefore, we will try to cover this event in as much detail as possible in a special material, which is currently being prepared by one of the readers and authors of our site

    Ooooh. I'll be looking forward to it.
    I always wanted to see the Red Hill and Gray Horse forts in person. And also the city of Krasnoflotsk. (Krasnoflotsk was the final station of one of the lines from the Baltic station. I had to go along the neighboring one to Kalishche).
    And one day I was taken there for a month. I was very surprised. :) Not at all like the forts of Kronstadt.
    I'll wait for the article and photos. We weren't allowed to film there.
  9. 0
    24 January 2024 10: 18
    The note from Minsk interestingly says “in Lithuania”. That's how it is!
  10. 0
    April 3 2024 14: 02
    Such a country was destroyed. Surely the Englishwoman screwed up with the First World War and the revolution. Russia developed by leaps and bounds. 20 years of peace, as Stolypin said, and we would live in another country. The situation repeats itself: war, terrorism, murders of officials, revolutionaries, etc. Surely even then all these essayists, socialists, communists, cadets and Octobrists were fed from abroad. Nobody needed a strong Russia. And the system itself then had a number of strong defects, so it was not difficult to overthrow it. There was no strong, strong-willed person then who would have harshly shot all this white and red husk, essentially the 5th column. The country is at war - and these bitches are putting a spoke in its wheels. Bodrov Jr. said correctly, after the war, judge as you want, when a country is at war, be at one with it.