The British Foreign Secretary said that the United States allegedly caused great damage to the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine without the loss of American soldiers.

During the Ukrainian armed conflict, the United States of America allegedly managed to inflict very large-scale damage to the combat potential of the Russian army, without losing a single American soldier. This statement was made by British Foreign Secretary David Cameron during the “Ukrainian breakfast” in Davos.

In reality, Cameron is clearly trying to pass off wishful thinking. Firstly, American citizens in Ukraine died, and more than once, only as mercenaries of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The exact number of American citizens killed in Ukraine is unknown. In addition, the American army is also faced with indirect consequences of the Ukrainian conflict - for example, weapons that the United States and other Western countries previously supplied to Ukraine are being used against it in the Middle East.

Secondly, the Ukrainian counter-offensive ended in failure and now the West no longer knows how to correct the situation. Thirdly, Russia retains a huge military potential, since the Strategic Missile Forces (RVSN), most of the Aerospace Forces (VKS) and the Navy were not involved in the conflict fleet (Navy) Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

Finally, Ukraine itself suffered colossal losses - and not only in the personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but also in the economy and demography. But with his statement, Cameron shows that the fate of the Ukrainian state and people is completely indifferent to him and other Western politicians. The West views Ukraine’s support in the conflict with Russia only as an investment in the confrontation with our country, and nothing more.

Comments

[carpenter]

managed to inflict very large-scale damage to the combat potential of the Russian army, without losing a single American soldier

He's right about the American soldiers, but otherwise not...

[Aerodrome]

Quote: carpenter

managed to inflict very large-scale damage to the combat potential of the Russian army, without losing a single American soldier

He's right about the American soldiers, but otherwise not...

Yes, they showed the carcasses...

[carpenter]

Quote: Aerodrome

He's right about the American soldiers, but otherwise not...

Yes, they showed the carcasses...

These are mercenaries and "geese", but not soldiers.

[Montezuma]

Quote: carpenter

managed to inflict very large-scale damage to the combat potential of the Russian army, without losing a single American soldier

He's right about the American soldiers, but otherwise not...

I’m not entirely right about the losses among the American military (volunteers, plus advisers). But the most interesting thing is that he didn’t say a word about what damage was done to the Ukrovermacht. Or did the sheriff lose the natives, as usual, on the side?

[carpenter]

Quote: Montezuma

Or did the sheriff lose the natives, as usual, on the side?

The owners do not count the dead slaves.

[zloybond]

In reality, Cameron is clearly trying to pass off wishful thinking.

- in fact, he confirmed that the USA and Britain are waging war against us. One can say that they are already counting the losses inflicted on Russia, and Russia still has not even expelled their filthy ambassadors.

[Rt Rt]

The razors will say anything to cajole the amers, it’s cheap PR, just like the razors themselves are cheap

[Optimus Prime]

“The British Foreign Secretary said that the United States allegedly caused great damage to the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine without the loss of American soldiers.”

A very wise way to ruin countries without direct participation. The American people can be forever proud of this. Who is next after Ukraine?

[NakedMan]

Until we run out of countries willing to become cannon fodder for worthless promises. But as the scammers say: “The sucker is not a mammoth, he will not die out.”

[Paragraph]

The Ukrainians fought for everyone. They are destined to do so.

[Trapp1st]

The British Foreign Secretary said that the United States allegedly caused great damage to the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine without the loss of American soldiers.

And he tells the truth... This is rare.

the Strategic Missile Forces (RVSN), most of the Aerospace Forces (VKS) and the Navy (Navy) were not involved

Against this background, the attempts of the author of the article to continue to bully look sad and funny at the same time.

[runway-1]

You can’t say it more precisely; unfortunately that's how it is...

[opuonmed]

Well, don’t US and European soldiers die? no they don't die! Europe and the USA transfer weapons transfer!
for the transfer of weapons to the USA and Europe, something will happen????????? As I understand, for two years now there is nothing or something will happen for the transfer of weapons to the USA and Europe?????

[rotmistr60]

During the Ukrainian armed conflict, the United States of America allegedly managed to inflict very large-scale damage to the combat potential of the Russian army, without losing a single American soldier

He lies like an Englishman breathes. How many American military advisers (senior officers) and instructors suddenly died of heart attacks or were involved in car accidents? And this is without mentioning American mercenaries and other trash from the United States.

[Amateur]

American military advisors (senior officers) and instructors suddenly died of heart attacks or were involved in car accidents?

And even the US Secretary of Defense had his scrotum cut off...

[Prokop_Pork]

From such words, the residents of Urin probably peed themselves with happiness. What a great appreciation for their achievements.

[K-50]

The British Foreign Secretary said that the United States allegedly caused great damage to the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine without the loss of American soldiers.

The soldiers may not have died, although I doubt it; too many “instructors” gave up there. The officers were also not killed badly, considering how many times flying aircraft with high-ranking officers on board “fell” somewhere, during exercises and in other cases of “unexpected” death.
As they say, nothing was foreshadowed , and here it is as always.

[Эльдорадо]

Two ships and a submarine were destroyed. And there’s a lot more we don’t know. And all this without the loss of American soldiers!

[Olesya Lesya]

Submarine under repair. How is your toilet-cheeked fleet doing?

[cpls22]

Thanks to their “efforts,” the Russian Armed Forces are carrying out real modernization and gaining real combat experience.

[75 Sergey]

Unfortunately, this is so, but no conclusions were drawn, they gave a kick and flew away, but these fat-assed ones are still in their cushy places.

[mocnijogurt]

It was great damage to Russia done by US, on the very first day of war - it is a shame, but it is what it is, there is no turning back now. Something like this was expected for more then some 15 years, at least I read some Russian analyst what will happen after Syria (they were right about every detail). It seems that Russia was postponing attack on herself by every move they made in the past, and they are doing that for quite some time (20 years). Is it Russia prepared for final conflict without using nukes ? It remains to be seen, we certainly hope so

[75 Sergey]

Translation from the guy above
It was a huge damage that US caused to Russia on the very first day of the war - it’s a shame, but that’s the way it is, there’s no turning back now. Something like this has been expected for more than 15 years, at least I read from some Russian analysts what will happen after Syria (they were right in all the details). It appears that Russia has been putting off attacking themselves with every move they have made in the past, and they have been doing this for quite some time (20 years). Is Russia ready for a final conflict without the use of nuclear weapons? That remains to be seen, we certainly hope so

[Ivan№One]

what does "allegedly" mean?
do we have any losses? "big" anyway
how many Americans were killed in these battles? 3 mercenaries? or 4?

[I dare to_notice_]

"The British Foreign Secretary said that the United States allegedly caused great damage to the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine"
Well...I wouldn't use the word "allegedly".
Here's the "official" infographic for this morning.
If this is not “great damage”, then what is it?..
Russia in Ukraine is not at war with dill, but with all “world imperialism.”
It won’t be easy, but... we saw something cooler...

[Montezuma]

Quote: I dare_notice_

Here's the "official" infographic for this morning.
If this is not “great damage”, then what is it?..

UkroSMI is, of course, a very reliable source of information. As truthful as the UkroPVO reports about downed Russian missiles.

[I dare to_notice_]

Possible.
But after such a statement, leader, you are simply obliged to provide data from a reliable source.
Well, or at least the one you trust.
I'm really interested in comparing.
I'm waiting.

[I dare to_notice_]

Not...
The minus doesn't work.
The man said, the man does not minus, but lays out an argument.
I didn’t pull you by the tongue.
Who do you trust?

[I dare to_notice_]

Eloquent silence...
I'm no longer interested in you.

[Olesya Lesya]

Something is not enough at all. On other ukrosmi, I saw even more. You need it like a drug addict: 12 planes every day

[opuonmed]

Well, this is their opinion, but what is the Kremlin’s opinion?

[Tagan]

Quote: carpenter

managed to inflict very large-scale damage to the combat potential of the Russian army, without losing a single American soldier

He's right about the American soldiers, but otherwise not...

And he’s also wrong about American soldiers. Another thing is that they are being buried less than we would like.

[Osiris]

We can agree with this conclusion - the Yankees succeeded. We need to answer elsewhere...

[75 Sergey]

So maybe he’s talking about the attack on the Il-22, the situation with the A-50 is generally unclear, it seems to be intact... but there are doubts.
But the shooting could not have come from Ukraine.

[Ghost1]

Well, as if there is nothing new here, they are causing harm by someone else’s hands. No matter how much we talk about Western mercenaries, in fact NATO is fighting with the hands of Ukrainians. Therefore, they will not retreat quickly while everyone has someone to fight.

[bear cub]

This is very much wishful thinking on the part of the author, especially since there is a lot of truth in this statement. Mercenaries are not regular soldiers, they wanted to earn money and die, this is their decision, but I would not consider them soldiers. The military potential of the United States was practically not undermined; they did not lose a single aircraft or even one of the few tanks transferred. And they have thousands of F-16s and Abrams in the deserts.

[borisb]

unfortunately that is the truth .. but only because of Zelensky..

[Uprun]

Well, this is not news, when ours squeezed Little Russia, Crimea and Moldova from the Turks, not a single American soldier was injured.

[Ross xnumx]

The British Foreign Secretary said that the United States allegedly caused great damage to the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine no loss of American soldiers

This is how we saw it in Vietnam. How the coffins floated and flew to the USA, and how the howl arose.
The Anglo-Saxons are a vile formation that should not expect mercy!

[Vladimir M]

Of course, this man got excited about “very large-scale damage to the combat potential of the Russian army.” And he lied about “not losing a single American soldier” - there were losses of both American and British soldiers.... But it’s worth admitting that the Anglo-Saxons know how to fight with someone else’s hands and, moreover, skillfully.

[Fizorg]

Next: until the last outskirts resident

[sdivt]

Quote: I dare_notice_

Russia in Ukraine is not at war with dill, but with all “world imperialism”

You live in a vacuum, or what?
Or do you perceive these one-off batches of F-16s or Abrams as the entire arsenal of military equipment of this very “world imperialism”?
How many F-16s are in NATO service? Under 3 thousand sides. How much did Ukraine receive? Five, if I'm not mistaken?
How many Abrams were given to Ukraine? About 50, right? The Americans alone have about 2500 of these Abrams (various modifications) in service, and about 2000 more are in storage.
And so on for each type of weapon. Literally for everyone.
Stop talking nonsense about world imperialism. Today they prefer to pay off with money, it’s easier. Plus, this is another way to earn money.
And they haven’t even started fighting yet. I hope they don't start.

[I dare to_notice_]

Do not even hope.
Will start.
They always started and now they won’t hesitate.

[your1970]

Quote from sdivt

How many Abrams were given to Ukraine? About 50, right? The Americans alone have about 2500 of these Abrams (various modifications) in service, and about 2000 more are in storage.

What about the Challengers?
Rumor has it that there are fewer of them left in the Army of Naglov than there are tanks in Bovington, no??

[Sergey_С0710]

Well, he’s right - why try to put on a good face when playing for a C...
The Americans do not suffer losses - the author of the article should not identify mercenaries with regulars (this is like comparing a finger with another part of the body).
Russia is suffering serious losses in people and this is a fact! and the Amers frankly don’t give a damn about the Ukrainians - the West will fight with pleasure until the last Ukrainian!
The tension of forces and resources in Russia is now colossal - and naturally, many economic programs have been closed or reduced - now the main task is to increase the volume of the military-industrial complex and food and import substitution, which of course will be a big plus in the long run.
But for now this is a burden on the budget and this is noticeable in how the tax burden for businesses increases, for example, or the rise in tariffs and prices.
We must admit that the very fact of the start of the war is due to the fact that the West outplayed us and left us no choice.
In the current situation, non-standard solutions are needed so as not to play by the rules of the West.

[Jacques sekavar]

V.V. Putin spoke about the minimum required number of 200 million.
The size of the workforce has always been a big problem, and after the outbreak of the war, another 300 different specialists of working age were withdrawn from the economy, which aggravated the personnel problem critically.
The former owner of the PMC, Vagner Prigozhin, said that during the assault on just one Bakhmut, 20 soldiers of his army were killed, and in two years there were and will be so many such Bakhmuts and Mariupols.
V.V. Putin spoke about losses in the ratio of 1 to 5 - 1 to 7. If the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, according to various sources, range from 200 to 000 thousand, then we can estimate irrecoverable losses and loss of ability to work due to injury.
The damage is enormous, and it will be even worse if the army has to storm not Mariupol and Bakhmut, but Kharkov and Odessa, as various theorists and housewives are calling for, who have not donated a single ruble to support the army, the popular front or other volunteer organizations.
Therefore, the Russian Federation showed interest in completing the North Military District through negotiations in Minsk and Constantinople, making peace with Ukraine on compromise terms in which, as V.V. Putin said, the number of military personnel and military equipment, locations of deployments and other issues were spelled out.

[Berendey]

What kind of “..reconciliation with Ukraine on compromise terms” are we talking about? There can be only one compromise - replacing Zelensky’s execution with his hanging. But only. As for the rest, no compromise, only complete capitulation of Ukraine. Putin mentioned only one of our many demands - demilitarization, i.e. what, what and how many weapons the defeated side may have.

[bone1]

He’s right, only by Russian he means Ukrainians

[Archivist Vasya]

The West views Ukraine’s support in the conflict with Russia only as an investment in the confrontation with our country, and nothing more.

This is correctly noted, no one counts mercenaries as losses, so the Americans did not lose their soldiers, equipment - yes, but they don’t feel sorry for it. But the damage they inflicted on us was very serious, only stupid jingoists and a narrow-minded author can think otherwise...

[Vasily12]

We only fought a battle in Ukraine, albeit a long one. The war and the main battle are ahead, get ready to find yourself at the bottom of the ocean, the devil’s spawn cursed by all the gods.

[AlexWar]

In fact, Russia gained good experience from this war. Now even the missiles have begun to change. Because the old ones didn't hit so well. Rocket parameters are doubled. So Ukraine will soon have more powerful weapons.
I don’t think that Russia really lost anything, Russia didn’t send any conscripts, we still have a lot of arrogant young people.

[AlexWar]

Russia gave Tajiks passports, now they are sending them back to their own.
Who is sent to SVO? At first, those who served, they were entitled to, then apparently those who retired and about 30, 250 thousand were called up, now the recruitment is from those who want

[Jsem_CZEKO68]

Přesně napsáno, životy Ukrajinců pro Camerona nic neznamenají!

[Jsem_CZEKO68]

Well written, the lives of Ukrainians mean nothing to Cameron!

[Don Analyst]

If we Russians had outmaneuvered the Anglo-Saxons with our minds, then he would have been wrong. And since the strangulation of Paul 1, the Anglo-Saxons, with their cunning, have constantly forced Russia to sacrifice
the lives of their citizens.
That’s why they behave so boldly and brazenly to this day, because they get away with all their machinations...

[g0ryachevnn]

unfortunately this is so, and there will still be many offensives on both sides, no one is going to end this massacre, it was started for the wrong reason

[Yaroslav the Wise]

Not an article, but a fairy tale!!! And the Strategic Missile Forces are not involved, and the Aerospace Forces are not working at full strength, and the Navy is not involved.
Well, the Strategic Missile Forces are not about the Northern Military District at all. The Aerospace Forces is not operating at full strength because Ukraine has some kind of air defense. And carpet bombing is not about Russia! Navy? What Navy are we talking about? About the Pacific or Baltic? Oh! about Black Sea! Well, everything there is generally sad and sad.

So Cameron is right. Even if not everywhere and not in everything, but in the main thing he is right: the United States is defeating Russia without losing a single soldier. Mercenaries don't count at all. These are the kind of people in America that no one considers to be people there. And the so-called instructors... Well, their death is not critical.