How Crimean predators ravaged Rus' and tried to revive the Golden Horde

30
How Crimean predators ravaged Rus' and tried to revive the Golden Horde
Crimean Tatar horseman in an engraving by the Flemish engraver Abraham de Bruin


Crimean predators


The Russian state, led by Emperor Vasily III, led the Ten Years' War with Lithuanian Rus to victory, intending to take not only Smolensk (Three sieges of Smolensk), but Vitebsk, Polotsk and Kyiv. However, the war had to be waged not only on the western front, but also on the southern, against the Crimea.



The Crimean Khan Mengli-Girey (was the Crimean Tsar several times, first took the throne in 1467, reigned until 1515), who for a long time was an ally of the great sovereign of Moscow Ivan III Vasilyevich, grew old, was ill and lost the threads of rule. His sons fought for power, needed money, and Lithuanian diplomats gave it, promising an annual tribute of 15 thousand zlotys if the Crimeans attacked the Russian kingdom.

On the other hand, slave traders acquired great power in Crimea. The Ottomans and Tatars in the Sublime Porte themselves were almost not involved in the slave trade; for a warrior this trade was considered shameful. People (yasyr, from the Turkish esir - “prisoner of war, captive”) were caught and handed over to traders. And since ancient times, Arabs, Greeks, Jews and Armenians have been merchants.

In Crimea, since the times of the Khazaria, this black trade has been monopolized by the Jewish community. She was connected with other Jewish communities in the Ottoman Empire, Central Asia, Persia, the Mediterranean countries and Western Europe. The slave trade has long been one of the most profitable “businesses”, along with the drug trade. Therefore, slave traders encouraged attacks by Crimean troops on Lithuanian, Muscovite Rus', and Poland. White Slavic slaves and children were always at a premium.

Perekop has become the largest wholesale market. Here merchants bought yasir-full from warriors. In the Cafe, “living goods” were resold and transported to different destinations. The Crimean Khanate itself has changed a lot. Previously, the basis of the economy was production - cattle breeding, farming and gardening. Now the economy has become almost entirely parasitic, appropriating. During large campaigns, almost all men went for yasir. A narrow specialization of the Crimean Khanate developed. Without this, the Crimeans could no longer exist. Everyone depended on the money of slave traders - princes, princes, viziers, murzas, courtiers and warriors.

In Lithuanian Rus, the Ukrainian outskirts of Poland, due to large-scale invasions and raids, which the lords were unable to counter with a developed border line of defense (batches, guard fortresses, Cossacks), the border areas literally became a human desert. Rich, fertile lands turned into a Wild Field. There was noticeably less prey, so the Crimean predators decided to switch to Muscovite Rus'. Here the interests of the Polish king and the Grand Duke of Lithuania Sigismund, slave traders and Crimean princes coincided.


Jozef Brandt. "Recapturing the Yasyr"

Threat from the South


Already during the life of Mengli-Girey, the corrals of the Crimean princes began to disturb the Ryazan, Seversky, Chernigov and Tula lands. In 1507, the kalga (heir to the throne) Mehmed-Girey, the eldest son and co-ruler of Mengli-Girey, led a raid on Moscow lands. The Crimean Tatars invaded the southern Russian lands and ravaged the surroundings of Kozelsk and Belev. Russian governors repelled the Tatars from the banks of the river. Oki and recaptured the captured full.

In May 1512, the sons of the Crimean king Akhmed-Girey and Burnash-Girey attacked the southern Russian lands, where they ravaged the environs of Belev, Odoev, Vorotynsk, Aleksin, taking away many people. Russian regiments pursued the enemy, but the Tatar princes successfully escaped. In June 1512, Tsarevich Akhmed-Girey launched a new raid on the Moscow outskirts of Ukraine. The Crimeans broke into the Seversk land, where they ravaged the outskirts of Putivl, Starodub and Bryansk.

In July 1512, Kalga Mehmed made his third campaign against the southern Russian lands and invaded the Ryazan region. The Crimeans managed to devastate only the outskirts of the Ryazan land. The Moscow governors, pursuing the enemy, followed the Tatars across the Don to Tikhaya Sosna, but were unable to catch up with the enemy. In October of the same 1512, the fourth raid on Russian lands took place. On October 6, Tsarevich Burnash-Girey and his army suddenly approached Ryazan. The Crimean Tatars captured the fort and ravaged the Ryazan settlement. However, the Russian garrison repelled all enemy attacks. Three days later, the Tatars with a large number of troops left for the steppe.

In June 1513, the Crimeans devastated the environs of Bryansk, Putivl and Starodub. In the fall of 1513, Kalga Mehmed, at the head of a large Tatar horde, launched a raid on the Seversk land. Auxiliary detachments of Lithuanian governors took part in the campaign. The Seversky appanage princes, with the support of the Moscow governors, repelled the enemy invasion. In March 1515, Kalga Mehmed-Girey carried out a new campaign against the southern Russian possessions. The Crimean Horde invaded Severshchina, where the Tatars, together with the Lithuanian governors, unsuccessfully besieged the cities of Chernigov, Novgorod-Seversky and Starodub, capturing a large number of prisoners.

In April 1515, the old Crimean Khan Mengli-Girey died. The throne was taken by Mehmed-Girey. He behaved impudently and arrogantly. He announced that Crimea is the heir to the Golden Horde. He tried to unite the former uluses of the Horde and turn Lithuanian and Muscovite Rus' into tributaries. During this period, during the Kazakh invasion, the Nogai Horde was defeated. Many Nogai princes recognized their dependence on the Crimean king and moved with their people to the western bank of the Volga. Later, the Nogais returned to their ulus, but for some time they were subordinate to the Crimean Horde.

His younger brother Akhmed-Girey, who relied on his ulus centered in Ochakov, rebelled against Mengli. Akhmet tried to establish connections with Moscow and Istanbul. But in the end, the older brother defeated the rebel. Ahmed was killed.

Mehmed-Girey demanded that Tsar Vasily Ivanovich pay tribute and return to Lithuania not only Smolensk, but also Bryansk, Starodub, Novgorod-Seversky. Putivl. Crimean troops trampled the southern Russian lands almost every year. The Nogai Horde and Lithuanians joined the Crimeans. Evstafiy Dashkovich also acted with them, uniting detachments of free Cossacks.

Russian governors repelled most of these raids. The intelligence was good. The border cities were strong; the Crimeans did not know how to storm fortresses. Moscow governors quickly assembled regiments and drove out the enemy. It happened that they dispersed enemy hordes that did not want to engage in a proper battle, and rescued prisoners.

The alliance with Crimea often backfired on Lithuania itself. If in Muscovite Rus' they did not take yasyr, or they took little, then the Tatars went to neighboring Lithuanian Rus'. They robbed and burned villages and took people away. At the same time, they also took money for the march to Moscow.

However, it was difficult for Moscow to fight on two fronts. Large forces had to be sent every year to cover the southern borders. This did not allow us to concentrate on the Lithuanian front and achieve decisive success.


The main routes for transporting yasyr (full) from Southern Rus'.

Diplomacy during the Ten Years' War


At that time, the Russian kingdom had good relations with the Ottoman Empire; there was nothing to divide yet. Therefore, the Russians repeatedly complained to Constantinople about the Crimeans. Sultans Selim and Suleiman, who replaced him, sent orders to Bakhchisarai to stop the raids. But there was no point. The Crimean Tsar blamed everything on the willfulness of the princes and Murzas. And it was beneficial for him to fight with Moscow. In addition, in fact, he could no longer simply change the essence of the predatory Crimean kingdom. One day, in a reply to the Sultan, he simply admitted this:

“If I don’t go to the Wallachian, Lithuanian and Moscow lands, then how will I and my people live?”

Other powers began to intervene in the protracted war. The Lithuanians were helped by Poland, Czech and Hungarian relatives of King Sigismund. Russia was also looking for allies to create a second front for Poland. Moscow tried to conclude an alliance with Denmark.

At this time, Sweden left the Kalmar Union with Denmark. Kalmar Union 1397–1523 - the unification of Denmark, Norway (with Iceland) and Sweden (with Finland) in a personal union under the supreme authority of the Danish kings. The Danish king Christian II tried to bring Sweden back under his control. The Russian kingdom and Denmark entered into an alliance against Sweden. But Christian was overthrown by his own subjects, and he fled to Germany.

Another ally of Moscow was the Teutonic Order. The knights wanted to throw off vassalage from Poland. Master Albrecht of Brandenburg turned to Muscovite Rus'. In February 1517, the first envoy of the order, Dietrich Schonberg, arrived in Moscow and conducted active negotiations with representatives of the great sovereign. They culminated in the conclusion of the first international treaty between Russia and the Teutonic Order. The treaty of union was signed on March 10, 1517. Moscow's envoys repeatedly appeared on the lands of the order, helped the knights financially, and gave money to recruit mercenaries.

In December 1519, the war between the Teutonic Order and Poland began. However, it quickly became clear that the knights had already lost their former combat potential. In 1521 a truce was signed. In 1525, the Peace of Krakow was signed, according to which most of the Teutonic Order was secularized and declared a vassal Duchy of Prussia to Poland. Grand Master Albrecht of Brandenburg-Ansbach became the first Duke of Prussia. The Teutonic Order, which elected a new master, continued to exist, but no longer played any significant role.


Albrecht of Brandenburg-Ansbach exchanges diplomats with Basil III. Facial chronicle vault

Moscow is offered Constantinople and the Polish-Lithuanian kingdom


Moscow also remembered the long-standing anti-Polish alliance with the German Emperor Maximilian. An embassy was sent to the Holy Roman Emperor. Maximilan formally agreed with Moscow’s arguments that the Jagiellons had become too strong and dangerous. The emperor agreed to renew the alliance. Diplomat Sigismund von Herberstein was sent to Russia for negotiations.

In fact, Maximilian had no intention of supporting either Russia or Poland. He wanted to use them for war with the powerful Sublime Porte. Herberstein's goal was to persuade Tsar Vasily III to make peace with Lithuania in order to jointly fight the Turks. But the Lithuanians demanded the return of Smolensk, and Herberstein supported them. And Vasily responded with a decisive refusal.

The Roman throne traditionally took the side of Russia's opponents. Pope Leo X of the Medici clan organized magnificent celebrations and illuminations in Rome on the occasion of the victory of the Lithuanian regiments near Orsha. In Western Europe, at the instigation of Lithuania, this victory was inflated in every possible way. Also, Pope Leo tried his best to convince the Teutonic Order not to fight with Poland. However, when it became clear that the Moscow regiments were taking over, the Lithuanians were running out of steam, there was no money for the war, and the gentry were in no hurry to leave their family estates, the Pope and Emperor Maximilian urgently became concerned with peacekeeping. Moscow was called for prudence, convinced to give up Smolensk, and frightened by the Ottoman threat.

To push Moscow into an alliance with Lithuania and a war with Turkey, Pope Leo even promised to recognize the rights of Emperor Basil to Constantinople and promised to crown him a “Christian emperor.” Moscow was also given hints about Lithuanian Rus. They say that Sigismund has no heirs, when he dies, Vasily can nominate himself and receive Lithuania along with Poland. The Pope unequivocally vouched for Vasily Ivanovich's victory. This required a “trifle” - to unite the Russian Church with the Catholic Church.

Moscow did not like this, and they answered unequivocally that in matters of faith they do not need intermediaries.

Thus, the then collective West and its think tank, Rome, once again tried to push through cultural and informational sabotage. Subordinate Russian Orthodoxy to the papal throne. They promised a lot. In essence, Rus' was supposed to become the cultural periphery of Europe. With the gradual loss of its originality, the death of Russian civilization.

In fact, Pope Leo and Maximilian lied. They wanted to deceive Moscow by tempting them with the Polish-Lithuanian crown. In fact, they were hastily looking for a bride for King Sigismund so that he would not be left without an heir. In 1518 they betrothed the Milanese princess Bona Sforza to him. She gave birth to an heir - Sigismund Augustus. It was brought to Poland by the same Baron Herberstein, who was a mediator in the Russian-Lithuanian negotiations. The Sforza family supplied mercenaries throughout Europe and was fabulously rich. Bona brought a large dowry, which allowed Poland to continue the war and take over the Teutonic Order.


Meeting of Grand Duke Vasily III with the emperor's ambassadors near Mozhaisk (19th century engraving). A. I. Charlemagne

Invasion of the Crimean-Kazan horde


Meanwhile, the situation on the southeastern borders worsened. In December 1518, the childless Kazan Khan Muhammad-Amin, a protege of Moscow, died. In the spring of 1519, the great sovereign Vasily III placed his protege, Kasimov's prince Shah-Ali, on the khan's throne in Kazan.

The Kazan Murzas, opponents of the pro-Russian party, organized a conspiracy against Shah Ali. They asked the Crimean king to send his brother to Kazan. He sent his brother with a detachment. In the spring of 1521, Shah Ali was overthrown and fled to Russia. Sahib-Girey was elevated to the Kazan throne.

Immediately, before Moscow came to its senses, the Crimean and Kazan hordes invaded Russian lands. The Nogais, Lithuanian troops, and Dashkovich’s Cossacks, who were sent by the Polish king, also took part. The Grand Duke hastily assembled an army, entrusting command to his brother Andrei Staritsky and Dmitry Belsky. But they commanded very poorly, the regiments were positioned poorly and were the first to flee when the enemy attacked. The Russian regiments were defeated, settled in fortresses, the Crimeans and Kazan people united near Kolomna and marched on Moscow. The pogrom in Rus' was terrible (Crimean tornado. How the Crimean and Kazan hordes destroyed Moscow Russia).

Tsar Vasily left for Volokolamsk to gather a new army. The regiments were recalled from the Lithuanian front. The steppe inhabitants besieged Moscow, the khans stopped in the royal village of Vorobyovo, admiring the city of Moscow from the heights. Those who approached the fortress were repulsed by artillery. But the city was not ready for a siege; there was little gunpowder and food.

The boyars sent a delegation with gifts from the gods to the Crimean king. The Tatars also could not besiege the city. This could lead to large losses, lack of time and room for maneuver. And at this time the Russian sovereign could approach with an army. So Mehmed took the gifts and led the horde away. He was also given a letter stating that Vasily recognizes himself as a tributary of Crimea.

On the way back, the Tatars tried to take Ryazan, but were defeated. During the battle, the Ryazan governor Khabar Simsky captured the royal charter. Meanwhile, the royal regiments rushed to the rescue of Ryazan. The Tatars retreated, but took away a huge full. The price of slaves in the markets fell sharply.

Because of the attacks of Crimea, Moscow had to abandon the idea of ​​a decisive victory over Lithuania (The invasion of the Crimean-Kazan horde saved Lithuania from complete defeat). Negotiations began. The condition of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was deplorable. It was completely devastated by the war. On September 14, 1522, a truce was concluded in Moscow for five years, according to which the Smolensk lands remained with Russia, but it renounced its claims to Kyiv, Polotsk and Vitebsk.

The collapse of hopes for the revival of the Golden Horde


Meanwhile, Crimea reached the peak of its power. King Mehmed, with the support of the Nogais, captured Astrakhan. He proclaimed his eldest son and kalga Bakhadyr-Girey here as the new khan. The three Tatar kingdoms united and the Nogai Horde was subordinated. It seemed that the Golden Horde was being revived. But the power of the Crimean kingdom turned out to be an illusion.

The Nogai princes, who feared the growth of Mehmed's power and coveted the Astrakhan spoils, formed a conspiracy. The arrogant Crimean Khan disbanded his army and remained in Astrakhan with a small squad. The Crimean Khan and his heir Bakhadyr were lured out of the city by the Nogai Murzas and massacred along with their retinue and guards. Then the Nogais made a surprise attack on the Crimean Horde, defeated and robbed it. Only two of the khan’s sons, Gazy and Baba Giray, were able to escape. The dream of restoring the Golden Horde was buried.

Moscow is establishing order on its eastern borders. When the Kazan Tsar Sahib-Girey learned about the capture of Astrakhan, he ordered the execution of Ambassador Vasily Yuryevich Bushma Podzhogin, who was in his captivity, and Russian merchants, which caused serious discontent in Moscow. In September 1523, a new campaign against Kazan began. The ship's army reached Kazan and, having ravaged the shores and surrounding areas, returned back. The horse army, having reached Sviyaga, defeated a large Kazan detachment. While these troops distracted the attention of the Tatars, the Russians built the Vasil-Gorod (Vasilsursk) fortress at the mouth of the Sura. The fortress became an outpost for a further attack on Kazan.

Sahib-Girey asked for help from Crimea and Turkey, but did not receive it. In the spring of 1524, the Grand Duke of Moscow Vasily III Ivanovich organized a new big campaign against the Kazan Khanate. The Kazan Tsar fled to Crimea. The Kazan people put his nephew Safu-Girey on the table. The Russian army besieged Kazan, but could not take it. After the departure of the Russian troops, the Nogai attacked the Kazan kingdom. Kazan made peace with Moscow. Safa-Girey recognized himself as a vassal of the great sovereign Vasily.


Grand Duke Vasily III Ivanovich. Source: Grand-ducal and royal hunting in Rus', volume 1, 1896
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    19 January 2024 04: 20
    The Crimeans, Nogais and others drank a lot of blood, and there is nothing to say about the slave trade, how many people over the centuries were captivated and sold, only God knows, a figure calculated by someone of 5-6 million caught my eye, but how accurate this number is unknown, so, another fortune telling.
  2. +11
    19 January 2024 07: 20
    To tell the truth, those Great People of Russia who first conquered the Crimean Khanate and then annexed Crimea to Russia are not sufficiently appreciated. Over the course of a couple of centuries, to endure about a hundred large raids by the Crimean Tatars is not because the rulers of that time did not worry about the fate of the people being driven away and the fate of the cities being ravaged. It’s just that at that time Russia was still weak, and there were a lot of enemies around. We had just sorted things out from the Golden Horde when the Poles, Lithuanians, Kazan Tatars, and now the Crimean Tatars jumped up. Truly Great are those sovereigns and princes who overcame all this and presented the Great Empire to their descendants on the altar of Russian history.
    1. -2
      19 January 2024 18: 29
      I apologize wildly, but can you tell me what is meant by the concept “... the Golden Horde was sorted out...”. What kind of “horde” is this?
      What kind of ethnic group, what territory did it occupy, what language did it speak and how did it live?
      And what does the word “...Russia...” mean at that time? And then - what does it mean “... Russia was still weak...” - in general, what and whose weakness was expressed?
  3. +6
    19 January 2024 07: 58
    Moscow is establishing order on its eastern borders. When the Kazan Tsar Sahib-Girey learned about the capture of Astrakhan, he ordered the execution of the ambassador Vasily Yuryevich Bushma Podzhogin, who was in his captivity, and the Russian merchants,

    There's something I didn't understand here. What is the connection between the restoration of order in Moscow, the internal chaos of the Horde and the execution of the Russian ambassador and merchants.
  4. +5
    19 January 2024 08: 24
    And the Jews are to blame for everything, so it turns out, according to the author’s opinion.
    And when before that the Slavs themselves caught and sold into slavery not only people from neighboring lands, but also fellow tribesmen, and Russian merchants took them to Byzantium, and were the Jews to blame? Or is it human greed, which has no borders or nationalities?
    1. +2
      19 January 2024 08: 58
      Quote: svp67
      ..they themselves caught and sold into slavery not only people from neighboring lands, but also fellow tribesmen and Russian merchants took them to Byzantium..
      It’s interesting after all... How did you manage to determine the nationality of the slave traders? Was it really possible that visiting merchants were forbidden to trade in Rus', and where then are there numerous examples of inscriptions, at least in Arabic and also in numerous other languages?
      1. +4
        19 January 2024 09: 09
        Quote: venaya
        How did you manage to determine the nationality of the slave traders?

        Yes, because the treaties between Rus' and Byzantium stipulated duties or the absence thereof on specific goods. And then the Prince’s trusted people, in this case his senior warriors, were engaged in trade with Byzantium.
        1. +4
          19 January 2024 09: 55
          Quote: svp67
          .. then the Prince’s trusted people were engaged in trade with Byzantium ..
          Any military action requires enormous funding and entrusting such a delicate matter as trade to outright amateurs (senior combatants) is simply inappropriate. Here I remember the parable about Rothschild the Elder: when journalists declared him the king of the Ashkenazis, he answered quite laconically and precisely that he was not the king of the Jews, but simply jew of kings !
    2. +1
      19 January 2024 09: 33
      Jews were always engaged in trade, and not in arable farming; if there was supply and demand for slaves, then they were engaged in the slave trade; among the Greeks and Armenians, trade was also highly developed, because many did not have a native land, and the Jews had no native land at all.
    3. -1
      19 January 2024 14: 51
      The article says that it was the Jews who were engaged in the Russian slave trade and not a word about greed. There is no need to put the dirty tricks of the creatures on your healthy head.
  5. +2
    19 January 2024 09: 41
    How do historians explain such a strange picture:
    1 from the south come to Rus' for slaves. This means there is a demand for them there.
    2 why didn’t Rus' need slaves? Why didn’t Rus' go south for slaves?
    3 They came from the south for slaves. The invaders were defeated. So take them as slaves and sell them where there is demand?
    1. +8
      19 January 2024 10: 01
      Quote: Valery Mamai
      Why didn’t Rus' need slaves? Why didn’t Rus' go south for slaves?
      Yes, because in such weather conditions as there were in Rus', no forms of slavery in Rus' are economically profitable; free people here always provided greater income. By the way, even in the north, in Siberia and Scandinavia, serfdom never existed, perhaps for this very reason.
      1. -1
        20 January 2024 18: 20
        So yes, slavery is not profitable for us, but we are talking about the sale of captured enemies. And no one refused to replenish the treasury by any means, but for some reason we refused, or these documents are in the archives but they spoil the image of noble Rus' and are therefore undesirable, and in those ancient times, selling prisoners you didn’t need was commonplace, from there it changed with time into a routine prisoner exchange.
    2. +6
      19 January 2024 10: 01
      I'm not a historian, but I'll try to answer.
      2 why didn’t Rus' need slaves?

      It's probably a matter of climate. In winter there is no need for a slave. There is no farming, a slave is not needed for hunting. As a result, except for crafts and some hard year-round work, a slave is not suitable.
      They came from the south for slaves. The invaders were defeated. So take them as slaves and sell them where there is demand?

      This is what happened, and again, taking into account the climate, this had to be done quickly, while the weather was warm and there was plenty of food.
    3. +2
      19 January 2024 11: 04
      Because Rus' is a bright place. What slaves? Of course, there was always nastiness and over time it became more and more. So now there is no Rus'...
    4. -1
      11 March 2024 19: 09
      Why does Rus' need other slaves if it had its own?
  6. +7
    19 January 2024 10: 46
    Rich, fertile lands turned into a Wild Field.
    Rather, the Wild Field turned into fertile lands when RI conquered these lands.
  7. +2
    19 January 2024 15: 13
    Thank you for the article. I read it with interest.
  8. +1
    19 January 2024 15: 57
    "Crimean predators"...
    Do you think they became herbivores after their faces were punched????
    And they are not predators - PARASITES.
    And the summary is one thing - to drive them out.
  9. 0
    19 January 2024 23: 51
    It’s the same thing, making heroes out of these Vasilievs, despite the fact that they were related to the paleologists. There was enough disagreement within Moscow and Novgorod at that time. The governors, who developed lands from Siberia to the Urals, played an important role in protecting the northern lands.
  10. +1
    20 January 2024 00: 22
    On the other hand, slave traders acquired great power in Crimea. The Ottomans and Tatars in the Sublime Porte themselves were almost not involved in the slave trade; for a warrior this trade was considered shameful. People (yasyr, from the Turkish esir - “prisoner of war, captive”) were caught and handed over to traders. And since ancient times, Arabs, Greeks, Jews and Armenians have been merchants.
    I didn’t meet any Arabs, but the rest lit up. And some more often than others.
    From the Resolutions of the Stoglavy Council of 1551.
    Chapter 72. On the Atonement of the Prisoners.
    Whom the Tsar's ambassadors will ransom in the hordes both in Constantinople and in the Crimea... and all those captives will be redeemed from the Tsar's treasury. And which Orthodox Christians are brought into captivity, having repaid Greeks and Turks, Armenians or other guests, having been in Moscow, will want to take them with them again, otherwise they won’t be given, and for that they will stand strong; Yes, pay them back from the Tsar’s treasury. (...)

    "A.A. Novoselsky. The struggle of the Moscow state with the Tatars in the first half of the 1948th century. M.-L., 208. P. XNUMX
    "On July 10 [1631], the Moscow envoys in Crimea Voeikov and Zverev learned that a Russian full had been brought to Bakhchisarai for sale overseas. The interpreter and clerk brought Andrei Lazarev, a village Cossack from Ryazhsk, to the camp, who said that he was captured by the Tatars (there were 500 Nogais and 80 Crimeans) in Petrovskaya Sloboda; the whole population was 75 people; of this number, the Crimeans got 25 people. The Tsar (the Tsar in this case is the Crimean Khan - my footnote) chose “head duties” 5 people: a boyar's son, two stanitsa Cossacks and two wives. They were brought to Bakhchisarai and brought before the Tsar; the Tsar questioned them and chose a ryashenka wife, Lyubavka, for his yard, and He gave the rest to the Armenians for sale overseas. The envoys immediately sent to speak to the king about this and demanded the return of the full load; their neighbor denied them this: “This never happened before, that I am full of giving for free.” However, the envoys defended A. Lazarev, despite the demands of the Armenians, and took him with them to Rus'."
    The envoys defended the village Cossack from Ryazhsk. But the rest is full, the Armenians took it to sell overseas.
    Here [17, p. 7].Shamray V.S. Historical background to the issue of yasirs in the North Caucasus and the Kuban region. B.m. B.g. pp. 6, 7."
    “The slave trade, practiced in the region for centuries, gave rise to the emergence of intermediaries in the form of merchants, for whom the trade in slaves turned into a special trade. In Avaria, some of the slaves were sold to eastern merchants through buyers in Derbent, Tarki, Aksai... According to pre-revolutionary authors, “... This kind of trade The Armenians were intensively engaged in this trade, who did not abandon this trade even with the advent of the Russians in the Caucasus. Taking advantage of their position, they helped the mountaineers to steal people within our borders, receiving for this an appropriate reward from the mountaineers, and then helped the Russian Government in negotiations with the mountaineers about the ransom of the same prisoners - also not without compensation, or they ransomed them themselves in order to resell them to the Russians ... "

    From the notes of the prefect of Caffa, Dominican Emiddio Dotelli D'Ascoli: “Description of the Black Sea and Tataria”, 1634.
    However, travel to Tana is very difficult due to the numerous shoals located there, which do not allow large ships, much less galleys, to pass through; Moreover, the sea is very narrow and with any storm, even a small one, ships are thrown ashore or run aground. In addition, Moscow Cossacks are watching the ships and guarding the passages and, although the owners diligently find out exactly when the Cossacks sailed to the Black Sea, it nevertheless very often happens that ships involuntarily fall into their hands, being subjected to plunder and slavery; the Turks (Tourchi) are killed, Christians are given a ransom, unless they themselves bought slaves; in this case they are killed mercilessly, as was the case last year with many Armenians. There is no doubt that Tana would benefit indefinitely if a recess was dug from there to go to the Volga; in this case it would be possible to earn a lot of money.
  11. 0
    20 January 2024 15: 15
    Quote: Asiat-S
    I apologize wildly, but can you tell me what is meant by the concept “... the Golden Horde was sorted out...”. What kind of “horde” is this?
    What kind of ethnic group, what territory did it occupy, what language did it speak and how did it live?
    And what does the word “...Russia...” mean at that time? And then - what does it mean “... Russia was still weak...” - in general, what and whose weakness was expressed?
    Sorry, but the forum will not replace your high school course... You should have listened to the teacher.
  12. 0
    20 January 2024 18: 15
    In my opinion, it is in these places (Kazan, Kalmykia, Astrakhan, Crimea, Ukraine) that one should look for the origins and end of the so-called Tatar-Mongol yoke. Why? To go conquer and rob, you need to know your neighbors well, so as not to snatch the people yourself, and know what exactly you want to take home, and have lived long enough to know the inner workings of your neighbors. Man is designed in such a way that he wants to spend his wealth here and now during his life, and not later when he returns as an old man from a hike 10000 miles away, which already limits the search circle to his closest neighbors (don’t forget geography and climate). To go rob you need to have an army, and half of them stay at home to guard the women and children, and this already hints at the presence of a state. The Tatar-Mongol campaign against Europe (at least they know their neighbors where they are going, they live nearby, they have the strength and army for the campaign). Hence the conclusion that the yoke lived for quite a long time near Russia and knew us well, just as we knew them. They took advantage of the weakness and enslaved us for a while, until they themselves degenerated or one of their neighbors already visited them, which we took advantage of by removing the yoke from ourselves . In the same place, treasures in treasures must be looked for in marketable quantities of that era (and they exist - isolated finds in Asia, rather like isolated gifts along the caravan routes went there. Also in language and culture (peoples are cut out at the roots, assimilated with stronger states, migrate due to natural disasters and so on, hence the guess that the hordes did not necessarily come from Mongolia.
  13. 0
    20 January 2024 21: 27
    Thus, the then collective West and its think tank, Rome, once again tried to push through cultural and informational sabotage. Subordinate Russian Orthodoxy to the papal throne. They promised a lot. In essence, Rus' was supposed to become the cultural periphery of Europe. With the gradual loss of its originality, the death of Russian civilization.

    Personal opinion, but without this paragraph the article would not have become worse.
  14. -1
    21 January 2024 10: 13
    Vasily III is the great ruler of Russia, undeservedly forgotten.
    And the article is pseudo-historical, written for the sake of such emotions:
    "Crimean predators"...
    Do you think they became herbivores after their faces were punched????
    And they are not predators - PARASITES.
    And the summary is one thing - to drive them out.

    The author successfully incites hatred.
    People sold in Crimea were resettled free of charge to warmer climes, where legally the position of a slave was better than that of a serf, which became the descendants of those who were not driven into slavery.
    And the attached map indicates the routes that were formed even before Rus' and the Horde. Roughly speaking, these are watersheds.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      23 January 2024 23: 49
      By the way, yes. Why was the slave trade in the Black Sea region almost completely monopolized by Armenians, Greeks, and Jews? Yes, because the Tatars and Turks could have big problems with prisoners. The most obvious problem is that a prisoner can declare at any time that he wants to convert to Islam. In this case, that's it, drain the water. Especially if the mullah heard. And if you didn’t hear, then someone will still report it. And then the Muslim who bought this captive will be forced not only to release him, but to provide him with everything necessary for life, at least for the first time. Who needs this?
      And one more moment. Even if the prisoner remained a Christian, in Crimea he was supposed to be released after seven years.
      But for Armenians, Greeks and Jews, these laws were optional.
      But out of harm's way, the captives were still taken overseas for sale.... alas, often to Christian countries.
      1. -1
        23 January 2024 23: 59
        It is logical that slaves were traded not only
        Armenians, Greeks, Jews
        , but Orthodox Bulgarians, Romanians and Eastern Slavs. Which Abrahamic religion prohibited human trafficking?
        1. +1
          24 January 2024 23: 23
          Again. I cited evidence in which one or another people from those listed above appeared. Right here
          On the other hand, slave traders acquired great power in Crimea. The Ottomans and Tatars in the Sublime Porte themselves were almost not involved in the slave trade; for a warrior this trade was considered shameful. People (yasyr, from the Turkish esir - “prisoner of war, captive”) were caught and handed over to traders. And since ancient times, Arabs, Greeks, Jews and Armenians have been merchants.

          Sorry, but Romanians and Bulgarians were not listed, firstly, and secondly, I did not come across evidence about Romanians and Bulgarians.
          If you want to post it, post it. I will add them to my collection. hi
          1. -1
            26 January 2024 13: 13
            A priori, all nations captured and sold (exchanged) prisoners.
            Perhaps on the Crimean shores such retail outlets were assigned by the Crimean rulers to the local pre-Horde communities that you write about. If the Bulgarians, Romanians and others did not own real estate in Crimea, then they simply could not engage in this business, and where they occupied a convenient place on their Black Sea coast, they had their own gesheft.
            However, whose power in Crimea is presented to that, forgive my French... The Ottomans or independent Crimean khans took fees, taxes and levies from slave traders. That is, the rulers of Crimea cared about the prosperity of the slave trade.
            To your ethical version about the indecency of human trafficking in the Ottoman Empire, I will add an economic one, although pecunia non olet.
            Formally, non-Muslims did not pay jizya (property tax for non-Muslims) for slaves, but Muslims paid zakat (property tax for the faithful) for both houses and slaves, as part of their property. If slaves are kept for sale, then there are a lot of them in the asset, and the business tax is higher for Muslims.
  15. 0
    April 12 2024 13: 10
    The article is interesting, everyone is free to draw their own conclusions after reading it. I made the following conclusion for myself: the psychotypes of the peoples mentioned in the article have not changed at all over the past centuries... Without reference specifically to the slave trade...